I loved that too. I can hear people now, my INS was great and updated, and still missed with dumb bombs! hahahaha

"Good enough for military work."

Agreed! So much for avoiding civilian casualties. Oh and not having the 'moving map with TSD' at EA launch is just ridiculous! I have bought two of RAZBAM's modules, and those are the last two I will ever buy.

@@tonyascaso6254 I agree that this limitation is going to force me to work harder and smarter within the limits of the initial release. Do you need a WSO ?

man i can drop bombs more precisely in m2k😁

Hornet and Viper do not have the high resolution radar modes that the Strike Eagle has.

@@SpecialistBR Correct, however ED's implementation is still rudimentary, and missing a lot of features that the real jets have - I'm just asking for that to be fleshed out.

Agree 100% . The Doppler Beam Sharpening in expanded modes still need a lot of work. Especially when compared with media that’s readily available to compare it with.

@@mitchelloswald6840 curious if you're aware of how hard it is to maintain the core engine such that all of these modules can compatibly fly together in the same server? Versus how much time it takes to implement just one module.

@@EbonySeraphim At some point that becomes a bit of a cop out argument. ED makes a framework for which 3rd parties would have to adhere to for a module to open in the SIM. It would be really inefficient if they constantly had to duplicate work. Multicrew for example is a thing after being made a core element to the SIM. FLIR modeling was jacked up and fixed as a general API that all modules could use. When a bunch of things need to share some very similar functions, you do the bulk of that work once, and the differences are variable. The person you're responding to is talking about a element that would be computed locally, and applies nearly equally to more than one module. Remember ED has some supposed super large single player fanbase. It irks me that things like NCTR tables not being updated years after a module has been released. Clouds still don't block IR. It been 2 years since clouds have been synced in MP. There are still long standing bugs in the FC3 modules. Some of which were carried over from FC2 because they reuse code. Like WPs are broken in FC3 modules if you respawn without reslotting. It's been a thing for like 10 years. I'm not saying its "easy" but its not exactly super hard, because code is clearly being reused where it makes sense for the good and the bad. Having jets just be compatible in the same space it probably like 85% free.

Well I bought f-15E I am waiting I NEED İT!!!!

Soon…. ;)

2 weeks dude!

2 weeks

@@Loopyllu365 actually? I was just joking

no release date , its gona be random released apparently xD

might be April 12th...

@@BaxterCash highly doubt it ? what makes u say this

@@Cheiff117 Because the next DCS update date is scheduled for April 12, but there is no evidence that 15E will be released, and if we miss it, we will have to wait at least another month

@@BaxterCash It was not April 12th

Take your time. By the time it's released it will be fall or later. Just in time for Christmas! lol Of course I jest, but I wish they would just release it. If they're still working on it this late in the game, then they have come across serious issues that are keeping it from release. Not good. We shall see. I have no hope though. I bet we have the Sinai map or the new Channel map before this is released...

@@valuedhumanoid6574 Im from the future, we now have the "Channel map"

14 days :D jk ;)

Thats a long counting...

@@rama7267 One day more waiting is one day less to release 🤝

​@@colinrickatson6320 14 days... 14 weeks... it's the same for me, I've transcended time 🤽‍♂

Just like the F-16 ? This is far beyong any kind of simulation the F-16 has

My decade ago suggestion for ED was that DCS World would have a mission planning table/room. In single player you would be above a table with the paper maps, and you could click the whole map to first get in the area, as in pre-set map grid would be. Then you would need to choose the best fit map for your purposes, as the target might be on the edge of the predefined map. Anyways, you would have then that piece of map on table. You would have the latest intelligence reports side of the screen. Like target coordinate or other intelligence like road of column. The building, satellite photos, the recon flight pod photos. And you would place your unit symbols on the piece of map, you would draw your flight plan on the map, you would mark the targets and have the photos for it. Then you would save the flight plan as a mission, with chosen time of day, have the proper radio frequencies, callsigns and all. Give it to the HQ that would then place all that on the strategic map overlaid with all other missions, flights and their times and progress. So you example need to know if the friendly flights are going to go near you somewhere. That way you would nicely know yourself that at 1550 time the friendly flight should be passing 50 NM of your target area, just 5 min before you. So you know that if you get something in radar or RWR at the time that it is possibly that one. In multiplayer you would do mission planning with your wingman/WSO/ROW and flight. You would then after submitting plan, see all other players missions on the strategic map, and you would know what is going to happen. You would not be allowed to take-off without flight plan, with at least few sensible waypoints and sensible flight time in the area, with proper callsign, frequency and all. So you can't just take-off and randomly head to some direction and try to just kill someone randomly. With proper AI, you would need to get AI accept your mission, so it will not allow conflicting missions on same target area, issue warnings if there is conflict of operation area, there is no enough ingelligence information (AI overflied recon flights) and so on. And AI would automatically generate proper missions like that with all the information, so in quick missions you could just jump in, check the available missions or on-going missions by AI, and jump either in plane that AI is currently flying or accept pre-done missions and jump in time of its start, while whole world is dynamically evolving around you. Like in Falcon or Enemy Engaged simulators.

yepper this all is explained so janky as well. not a fan of the ins drift either. im not flying for real life. its a game. but ya the mission planner is lacking big time

These are called Suites. The modeled version is Suite 4+

Yes. Drift was set to be extra high/fast. For education purposes. IRL you get the much less drift, like about 1 NM per hour (or what it is in reality). So when you come to final leg, your designation doesn't really move anymore because drifting would be so negligent.

You can access all this from the front seat! Having a WSO will only make the tasks easier with workload

I was wondering that too, because plenty of other modules just use a single nav fix point enroute. But I think he mentioned why: you're not sure you're going to be able to see the fix point, so have a few for redundancy? And I think you want to do it early, on the inbound steerpoints , and not around the target site, so you're not overloaded with tasks on the attack.

@Inf yes indeed I also asked on the DCS forum and the guys over there said the same 😊

@@Sirrah81 ah good, glad we're both sorted out :)

2023

Q4 2024

two weeks /s

was released a few months ago, where you been??

You guys are awful haha

Yes. Adding secondary reflections is also experimented.

Desert Storm was pre-GPS when it comes to the F-15E.

I mean if someone starts taking down satellites you might need some backups to function without GPS.

​@@auqanova ofc, it's good to have as backup (even though I suspect jamming of GPS is much more likely than someone reaching ALL the way out to the GPS satellites to poke then :P - They are FAAAAR away).

@@Chwibon I intentionally typed 30 years to "miss" desert storm. :P Still, I am interested in an SME's take on this. And I hope we can turn off EGI in the ME for the 15. so we don't have to turn off ALL GPS in a mission to get the "old school" 15 vibe.

@@Jarlerus The Strike Eagle got EGI in the late 90s, just around Allied Force and not the entire fleet at once. That being said, a pre EGI jet has a ton of nuanced differences that you can't fully replicate like this. So this is a good way to simulate a training sortie where the real crew would practice for a no GPS environment. GPS jamming is highly localized and directional and the antenna is on the top of the aircraft so it's shielded, plus it has a ton of countermeasures for that anyway.

it appears off to me as well

i was gonna say it looks off by 180 lol

Fixed now ;)

@@Chwibon glad to hear I wasn't hallucinating. Figured better to point out now in case it wasn't caught

two weeks

not likely.

120Ds are still classified.

🤣

@@vikingcat794 I mean, they could at least do the spring pressure, trim and proper neutral point placement... I'll use my base software to add other effects, but still... Not much hope looking back at their other modules, but stil, no harm in asking, eh?

2 weeks

You can set the mode to GPS in the jet. You can see when he goes into the UFC when he jumps in the jet he's switching of the EGI mode

@@oppotato5440 ya i guess im just confused is all it all seems like alot in a video need to tinker myself with it

In what way?

Patience. For every one of you who's gonna be okay with missing features there's gonna be 20 of others that will shout it should have been left in the oven for longer. It's always better to get a more complete product.

You mean release the module

@@mauricefuchs7921 thx maurice

If it's not ready yet, why? Practice define patience, let them at least get it to a state they wanted it in first. You think people want it early, but you'll see the amount of moaning wegen they release it. ;)

@@tomaszwota1465 b Because we paid for it nearly 3 months ago.....

@@ianhaffenden8536 No one forced you to do that! You'd pay like what, 7 bucks more if you bought it with 20% off on launch? ^^

😂

How did they butcher it lol, what are you talking about

@@oppotato5440 the bombs missing their target at the end anyways by like 3 miles

@@GorbZZ thats the beauty of it, it isnt perfect. dumb bombs from 20000

@@GorbZZ have you ever tried CCRP bombing with dumb bombs? If you have you would already know. You should give it a try, it is really hard.