MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 2016 View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/8-01F16 Instructor: Prof. Deepto Chakrabarty License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms More courses at ocw.mit.edu
Пікірлер: 13
@cjaoun232403 жыл бұрын
Amazing course. I enjoyed watching every single second of the playlist. Thank you MIT!
@Postermaestro3 жыл бұрын
Great series!
@DavidMcMahon1007 ай бұрын
Very clear presentation!
@brainstormingsharing13093 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@fm749010 ай бұрын
Why should angular momentum be conserved? Angular momentum is conserved when the net torque is zero, but in this case we have a non-zero torque due to gravity
@Jess-eh6pl8 ай бұрын
The force of gravity is applied at the center of mass. As a result, it does not apply any torque, since the lever arm is zero.
@sandy-kd8ff5 ай бұрын
@@Jess-eh6plhow the lever aram can be zero
@stephanfernand11632 ай бұрын
for the two vertical axes, the angular momentum is conserved, but for the horizontal axis, the magnitude is conserved, but the direction is modified by gravity
@ScientistRenzo3 жыл бұрын
Oh my god I did it
@standowner69792 жыл бұрын
Congratulations. Now you can proceed to higher...
@jnhrtmn5 жыл бұрын
The spin axis has nothing to do with it. Tilting a spin plane starts the effect by creating a momentum exchange at the fulcrum created in the tilting plane. There is no motion allowed at the fulcrum, and it cleans out momentum on each side. The fulcrum axis is the key to the effect, because it creates opposing forces to start precession, then precession is itself a second tilting effect combined with the original input tilt. This causes the fulcrum axis to migrate with the combined tilting effect, and this causes the fulcrum axis to rotate closer to the initial input tilt, and this produces forces that oppose the initial input tilt. Drop the math and think about it. Follow the actual input components of momentum. Rotational momentum is set, and does not change by tilting it.
@vishwasshankar39294 жыл бұрын
Sorry I could'nt follow. Can you explain the fulcrum axis part?
@jnhrtmn4 жыл бұрын
@@vishwasshankar3929 I was going to merely describe it, but I recently developed the math that describes it as well. It is a paper that needs political momentum before it will get published. Angular momentum is a perfect analogy, but it is wrong, so an alternative right answer is not going to turn heads very easily. Everyone knows how a paradigm shift is supposed to be difficult, but they have no experience with it. This is your chance. I don't expect you to see it. It has been 15 years of trying to get scientists to see that a conservation law is not causal -it is a mnemonic device. Describing something with math does not mean that you understand it. But, if you can see my explanation, it is a mechanism and not a mnemonic device. The paper is here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3587972 SSRN is an Elsevier site. They wouldn't publish my paper, but they invited me to post it as a shared unfinished work on their SSRN site. Sometimes the paper is hard to find. Search SSRN.com for Hartman gyroscope, if you don't trust the link.