This movie is underrated?

Black Dot no🤷🏾‍♂️

Black Dot well of course dummy. And it’s one of my favs 😂

@@aaronbell89 nice attempt at an insult. Try to think of a better one. Don't hurt yourself trying.

Black Dot insult? I wasn’t insulting anyone. Matter of fact I wasn’t even talking to you to begin with. I was talking to the person who originally made the post. You just invited yourself to say something 🙄

DUH, it's a Robert Zemeckis movies

I work with VFX, and besides the obvious evolution in this almost three decades, the way we would do it today is almost the same. We would shoot her with a blue cap and separately shoot just her head and then put it all together. But Today we would make the twisted neck in 3d.

Yeah but today it would look cheap and fake compared to using practical effects. Look at star was original vs prequels. The special effects were better in the original because those were actual real life practical effects with some computer generated to compliment it. Where as the prequels were all CGI. They really did a great job here.

I just watched this again today and man it still looks pretty dang good! I feel like they still don’t get it right in current movies. A good example is in Infinity War when Bruce Banner pops his head out of the Hulk Buster suit and yells “you all are screwed”

I guess a sequel could work. Showing that they could never die. No matter what they do. It'll be nice to see what they're doing this day😂

They’re saying it is with Lady Gaga as Meryl 🤔

A head. Literally

IIRC everything before she comes into focus is a CGI double.

They were planning on using an animatronic double before they settled on the CGI. It looked even more creepy!

Same

Absolutely the same! Dialogues are brilliant! "NOW a warning?!"😂😂😂

Those ages aren’t old! Of course they looked good. Shesh, what are you? In your 20s?

Wow. They looked so great!

Those ages aren’t old and people should still look great

Isabella was actually 71 years old. She just looked 39.

@@michelegraham1181 3....9? 29!

The worst lie told

Duh, it's a Robert Zemeckis movie

Eh, it would not get done because some remake would seem more profitable

CGIs are supposed to be like a "flavor" or "spice" to enhance movies. The problem nowadays is that Hollywood treats CGI as if it's the "meal" itself. If they did this movie today I think they would have relied on the effects TOO much--neglecting other aspects of film like good character development, well-written dialogue, etc..

Yeah, so amazing

Sounds tedious af

@@MaxOakland It was incredibly tedious, but also very satisfying to see how (eventually) everything comes together.

Some reason visual effects back then was better

​@@tonystark559bcos nowadays unlimited possibilites with cgi kills the ideas, creativity. if everything is possible, you arent creative. if u have limits, you are (have to be) creative, and can cause the result amazing (this is true for ALL areas of human acts). The second most important is reflecting the real world physics in CGI (movement, dynamics,speed etc). That time visual masters had the knowing of real world buildups and behaviours of interactions betweens objects. nowadays cgi masters mostly tottaly dont understand the real world physics, we can see this in the 2000's years in every scifi movies, how badly physiscs was used by these masters....im calling this syndrome "idiot shrek-like scenes", where objects/characters has idiot movements, idiot appearance, idiot interactions (there are few exceptions, like TED with mark whalberg, the bear is realy good)

DUH. It's a Robert Zemeckis movie

Bob Zemeckis was an executive producer of the series!

Knew it sounded familiar!

Old comment but the movie was supposed to run under the Tales from the Crypt brand before they dropped the connection. It feels very much like a very long high quality episode of tales from the crypt.

dUh . These film makers don't bs around when making movies. Robert Zemeckis, James Cameron and Steven Spielberg.

I imagine it's one of those things where you say _"I enjoyed it, but I wouldn't want to do it again."_

Remember brandi love?

Me too.. it’s just so good!

I would argue how it "devolved".....Death Becomes Her looks as though it could have been released today and the visuals are incredible for 30yrs old . Superior to a lot of the shit coming outta Hollywood today!

Brandi love, old version.

yes we believe unknown rumour but not real video

too bad she's that lazy

Right, I thought i was the only one thinking of that. They need to do a part two. But they will probably use to much cgi

Disagree. I like the movie as is.

The ending showed the mistake that Helen And Madeline made while Ernest finally was free and even tho he wished that he would operate again, he still loves his life after 50 years old

@@Darlvua The difference between a *full life* and *living forever*

@@dnasty312 you are so right!

the movie is just.... bad, you know, they create a bunch of conflicts and just leave it, nothing solved (or badly solved) at the end of the movie, zero character development, it watchable mostly because of terrific cast and great comedic scenes.