Full episode: kzfaq.infobvMwjT1Vu-g Support our work with a donation: muslimskeptic.com/contribute/

Allah states "had he", which means he didnt.

the audacity of a christian using the phrase "logical thinking"

He says we are not logical but he believes 3 in 1.

Problem with his argument is also that basically he is telling us to believe in the Quran.

Guy is from David Wood school , man these Christians are really funny

Kaffir don't believe in Muhammad SAW as a prophet, but used Qur'an verses to debunk Islam. So ironic...

Everyone knows very little and yet everyone suddenly is an expert on Islam

Christians need to understand that the Quran is read by contexts not Verse the like the Bible

This argument is aslo easily refuted with a simple question. Did the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, die from a severed aorta? The answer is no. These young fools are so arrogant, instead of spending their youth learning, they spend it thinking they already know.

Bro got browed!

Barak Allahu feek Brother Daniel for defending the Deen from these conniving kuffar.

The death of the prophet ﷺ did not occur suddenly, hence it does not fall under the intention of the verse 1. The surah is makki, and the prophet ﷺ died almost two decades later. 2. The poison was given by the Jew in khaybar, 7th year after hijrah The prophet died in the 11th year after hijrah. So again, it wasn't a sudden death, nor can you definitively say it was the poison that actually killed the prophet... Some scholars have said that Allah wanted to grant the prophet the status of martyrdom, hence the pain of the poison resurfaced The quran says that the jews killed prophets. Similarly, they tried to kill our prophet ﷺ. They tried to poison him. They managed to kill one sahabi by the poison. The prophet ﷺ lived for 3 years after the attempted poisoning, and at the time of death he felt as if the pain from the poison resurfaced. The verse on the other hand implies a sudden death if the prophet lied upon Allah; a seizing by the hand, a sudden cutting of the aorta. Hence it's clear that the verse of the quran in no way belies the prophethood of muhammad ﷺ

full life of 63 years ~1400 years ago, protected from assasins, enemies and mistakes - Allahumma salli 'ala Muhammad.

Paul is the liar while Muhammad (SAW) is the truthful

From what I've read from tafsir of scholars, Al-Wateen (the life-line artery) refers to a specific part of the Aorta that if it were to be cut, the person would almost immediately die (E.g ascending aorta), while Abhar is not specific, so it can refer to the abdominal aorta or the thoracic aorta.

I stopped taking Christian apologists seriously a long time ago, but it’s still nice to see videos like this for pure entertainment

now I think none arabs criticizing islam are worse than arab ones

Surfer dude just got cowabungaed

Calm down BRAAA whats up BRAAAA hahahaha i am dead

that was a full blown humiliation

it’s so simple, how can he be a false prophets but also prophesied exactly how he would die?!

They put this "argument" a lot. They all seem to "learn" from the same source. May Allah bless you Daniel. They also use a lot the verse 39 : 4.

Another point is that this is an instant punishment had the prophet lied The lie would be followed by instant death as a punishment The prophet died a natural death of senile age after he delivered the whole message

Even if it’s true than the prophet is a real prophet and the Quran is a revelation

Daniel l love you man

First of all does anyone know of any poison, a natural poison considering this is the desert of Arabia which has a catalogue of poisonous plants, that has such an extreme physical effect that it severs, again "severs" as in cutting in half, the aorta?

He is the most prominent ignorant! Thanks Daniel!

قوله تعالى ( و لو تقول علينا ) هنا حرف ( لو ) هو حرف امتناع الامتناع فيكون معنى الكلام ( لو أن محمداً تقول علينا لأهلكناه و لكنه لم يفعل ذلك فلم يجب حينئذ معاقبته ) ، هذا أولاً ، و ثانياً العقوبة ليست هي قطع الوتين ( الموت ) لأن الموت في حد ذاته ليس عقوبة و لكن العقوبة هي ( لأخذنا منه باليمين ) أي لحرمناه من النبوة و الرسالة و الوحي ، و هذا لم يحدث بل أتم الله تعالى الرسالة و أكمل الدين قبل وفاة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم و كذلك فتأييد الله تعالى لنبيه لم ينقطع عنه حتى وفاته صلى الله عليه وسلم.

I remember hearing this argument some years ago, and it caused me some doubts. Alhamdulillah i came across Bassams article and it all made sense.

The ending 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Jazakillahu khairan brother Daniel for your logical response to these scumbags 😅

Thanks for mentioning that interesting website.just to add: we can read the text as saying, that the prophet would be seized by his right hand(he’d have his right hand seized) and he didn’t + if he had his aorta cut, then he’d just pass away directly, without having the time to say that I’m abt to pass away

Dang.. he embarrassed himself.. life time recovery brow.. 😂

JazakaAllah Khair..

...wait..so he believes that the Qur'aan is a revelation from God? That's what it looks like because he uses it as proof against the Prophet peace be upon Him. How would God send a prophet who lies? What's the point of sending a liar to deliver a message? But, if he believes that Muhammad peace be upon Him wrote the Qur'aan, how can the Prophet incriminate himself so blatantly, and how can he predict his own cause of death so precisely (according to what he claims was the cause of the death)?!

بارك الله فيك وجزاك الله خير الجزاء أخي دانيال.

So one hand he wants to prove that the Prophet Salla Allahu alaihi wa sallam is lying ma'adha Allah, which basically him saying that the Quran is not the truth from Allah, and then using a verse from the revelation that is false (according to him) to prove his point.. how lame!

1500 years and nobody can find a single error or contradiction.

This argument was popularised by David Wood and older than his rеtаrded kids.

Maybe bring Bassam Zawadi one day to your show? I'm subbed to his newsletter.

i challenge any muslim to find out what happend to his eye brows hahhaahahahahaha

1. Allah has commanded the Prophet ﷺ to convey the message and Allah promised to protect him in doing so i.e until it's completion. "O Messenger, announce that which has been revealed to you from your Lord, and if you do not, then you have not conveyed His message. And Allāh will protect you from the people. Indeed, Allāh does not guide the disbelieving people." (5:67) 2. Allah indeed saved the Prophet from dying before the completion of Islam. While Al-Barra R.A died immediately after being poisoned at the same time. The poison normally should've cut the "al-wateen" (immediate death) not "al-abhar" which mean it was not affected as it should which also directly destroy the argument. 3. The prophet ﷺ did not die before the completion of Quran. Therefore, the "aorta" argument is baseless. In conclusion, fear Allah. The Quran is a true reminder. Those who are disbelief will be in hellfire. May Allah guide us and have mercy upon us to be entered His paradise without reckoning.

Alhumdulillah summa Alhumdulillah I was so relieved that brother gave him a authentic and logical answer!

He claimed that the verse in the Quran wouldn’t be meant in a literal sense. And that’s a dishonest presumption and very common for the people of innovation (either from the Muslims or all Christians and Jews). The Arabic language is taken in a liters sense except there are indications in earlier Arabic sources that an expression is not to be taken literally or could be taken metaphorically. But the standard position is to take the statement literally.

Brother Daniel may Allah bless u even more

I am a Bengali. So, we have this word 'যন্ত্রপাতি' (Jontropati) which we use for both Heavy Machineries and Light Tools (Like Hammer and such). Thing is, Heavy machineries and Tools are very different things, yet, we use the same word. It's not weird. This is a such case. The English language didn't have that word, so both are expressed as aorta. Very simple. I am saying this because christians will probably get frustrated at this point and say something like, "you moslems are making excuses!". No matter how much you cope, a valid explanation is a valid explanation.

JazakAllah'u khairan brother

Which poison specifically affects the aorta?

I have studied Arabic for 8 years and English for 14 years. I would like to mention that most of the translations aren't accurate. Most of them are because of the fact that there aren't many words in English that conveys the full meaning of the words in Arabic. But...a few of them are because of the interpreters themselves who use the wrong words and there are other words which are better to use.

4:20 i lost it there 🤣🤣💔💔

‘Guy with perfect eyebrows’…😂 love it when Daniel throws in some wit as a side dish.

Daniel, you are savage. Brooo Brow😂

First of all, there is inherent negation in the ayahs he is mentioning. It's like "If you had stolen the money I would have punished you". This means subject didn't stole the money. Secondly, ayahs are revealed in Makkah, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was poisoned in 7th years after the hijra during battle of Khyaber and Allah punished Prophet Muhammad 3 years after that. What a logic!

I feel like that was his first time ever reading the word aorta because what was that pronunciation 😭

one would only have to ask who delivered that very revelation to immediately figure out the irrelevance of this stupid question.

Another way to look at it is . If you believe Allah promise in the Quran to bunish the prophet Muhammad if he told lies in the name of Allah. And then saying according to the hadeth that the prophet died as in the way of punishment as in the Quran. Doesn't that mean that the Quran said the Truth. And as such if the Quran is true then the prophet Muhammad wasn't a false prophet.

Good Job Brother

JazakaLahu khayr ya akhii faadil.

I previously talked about this subject with JW, referencing the same Surah and Hadith in a discussion ten years back. This method is utilized for people who are not adept in reading the Quran or lack expertise in both Arabic and English. While it's simple for bilingual individuals, it might pose challenges for those with less mastery in multiple languages.

السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ Assalamu’alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh

Please do a debate against sam shamoun. that dude brings up similar idiotic arguments but no one is catching him.

I never understand why this people exist as if we stole their land,houses,ethnicity and... oops that already been done by certain people that claim that they are the chosen people.

In a glance I can easily see that aorta has been written over something using a text editor 😂😂

Mashallah brother.

This will be a bit technical but, the first thing that debunk this argument is you cannot base a mutawatir narration which is Quran, on ahad (all the narrations other than mutawatir) narration, which is aformentioned hadith in the video😂. These guys know nothing about Arabic or Quran or hadiths but they really think that they are debunking the whole religion with just these ignorant arguments🤣😂😭. What an arrogance!

Had he... But he didn't....

Whenever you hear the words "I challenge any Muslim to answer..." it is an immediate pavlovian reaction moment where you roll your eyes/shake your head and inevitably wait for the slap on the forehead moment about to come. A'Sabr ya rab.

david wood used the exact same arguement ages ago

GUYS GUYS GUYS HE DEBUNKED ISLAM LOOOOLLLLLLLL such high IQ argument 🤣🤣🤣🤣

This argument was made by hammer time and 'Farid responds' debunked it years ago

mashallah. thanks for the video.

Christians come up with the most childish amateur arguments to troll Islam challenge: IMPOSSIBLE.

A christian talks about logical 😮!!!

That mimicking got me 😂😂😂😂

بارك الله فيك و جزاك خير الدنيا و الآخرة اللهم آمين يارب العالمين

So he accepts the Quran as an authority or what?

if he read well and was interested in understanding the Koran as well as his interest in his beautician, we would have heard nonsense

i like how relaxed u ar. turning what, to me, is a bitter argument to counter, into something comedic and fun. Masha'Allah

Moreover the word used in Qur'an is in past tense .. meaning if that was the case it we would have surely done that... Not will do this in the end

To every non-Muslim who feels they have an amazing argument that totally debunks islam in its entirety. A Islamic scholar from the Middle Ages probably wrote a detailed refutation of it a long time ago. Peace

Please, Ustath Daniel, more refuting, less mocking of physical appearance. It's a bad influence on your viewers and I've always seen commenters who go out of their way to ridicule somebody's look or way of speech.

Bruhhh this was funny especially the ending and as usual I learned how to defend! Thanks ❤

SubhaanALLah.... I can't believe how desperate some Christians are with there stupidity in trying to disprove what's always Right, i think that's why they all end up disgracing themselves. I pray to God to open your heart so that you all can see Light

Without lies Christianity dies

Btw the term that is used for "cut" is also different

Excellent response BRO 😅😅😅😅

why do these christians hide in a direct confrontation? -doglogic got annihilated by uthman on a wrong interpretation of corinthians verse after his master sam shamoun ran away from sheikh uthman. and eventually he was so embarrased from this interpretation that he brang up the consciousness argument to cover up his doglogic embarrasment. -sam shamoun acts tough online and even when some muslim agree to have a debate, he posts lies that "i destroyed a muslim" like heck he did nothing. he did the same with you and he eventually became quiet after you embarrassed him the 3rd time by pinging him to have a debate.

BrOooO 😂😂

People be saying "I'm not attacking your religion" yet tone and sentence said otherwise. I can't belive it's so predictable with so many people😅

"obviously not in a literal sense" Where does he get the idea from that that is not literal? I think because in christianity they choose and pick what is metaphorical and what not that they also think this applies to the quran?

I think it's a little too much to attack his appearance, it's not like he's being derogatory, he's just pointing something out as a disbeliever. I think the condescending comments are uncalled for. Allahu Alam

Brother Daniel You don't need to make fun of his appearance to refute his argument his argument based on ignorant of the Arabic language

Pls share the details of mentioned scholar( Usthad bassem.....)

Jazakallah khair brother Daniyal 😂

That ustaz daniel’s surfer hippie dude talks on point 😂😂😂

Subscribed well done 👍

who would ever take someone like him seriously! people these days.

GOTEEM Ustadh

daniel knows how to cook, god bless with that ending hahah