faster wave frequency, and faster data throughput, yes

@@executive it is called higher frequency not faster

@@devrim-oguz and what is the frequency, smartass?

@@executive he is talking about the speed of light

@@devrim-oguz he is talking about 5G

The human body is electric. What does these frequencies that you cannot see do to your body and mind? Do you really trust those who make money off of our ignorance?

Did he try to sell you a tinfoil hat? 🙂

So cute that the 🇺🇸 is how much bigger than your country? A little logic & critical thinking every now & again is a useful thing.

@@dshepherd107 So you believe that the US has such abysmal internet service because it’s “big”? Critical thinking is important, but it’s useless when it’s not based on the facts. I’m not talking about providing service somewhere in the Mid-west; even WITHIN major US cities, coverage is spotty, outdated and slow. Inside the city limits of Los Angeles, for example, it is common to have no coverage at all (let alone 5G)! Providers still advertise with “no dropped calls”. That’s insane. Every square meter of Europe has “coverage” of 4G or better. Major cities all have 5G. Average speeds are double those in the States. No matter who your provider is, your phone will work anywhere and everywhere with no roaming fees. And an unlimited data and calls monthly fee for your phone will set you back about $20. (If 5gb is enough for you, it will cost about $5 a month!) There isn’t even a WORD for “dropped calls” in German. And, as I said, Korea already has had 5G for nearly 5 years. So has Japan and China. My download AND upload speeds are over 500Mbps. And in major cities like Seoul (“only” 18 million inhabitants), every floor of every building, including basements and underground parking lots, has 5G. But seriously, if it makes you feel better to believe that being so darn “big” is your problem, be my guest. I think it’s adorable.

so bruh y’all driving tractors n all with that? or are you the ‘elite’ of your nation?

@@wolf-bass Such Decadence.

Yep. The U.S. seems to be moving backward is some areas too...like for women's rights. Very sad.

That depends on the frequency band used. 5G can use any band that 4G or 3G uses, but also includes higher frequency C band and mmWaves. Coverage on the lower bands would be similar to 4G on those bands, but the higher frequencies, particularly mmWave, would have shorter distances. On the other hand, they're better for areas with higher user density.

@@James_Knott thank you for your answear!

What?

I don't think they would have spent this much money on it, if nobody needed it

5G works very differently to wifi

@@devrim-oguz similar ghertz range no?

In a world of robots and autonomous cars.. it will be needed

@@gerardparker4220 artificial intelligence does not need high latency networking. What that kind of Ghtz is incidentally good for is passive excitation of rfid circuits. Long story short, you could send out a 5G pulse and then get an echo back from each device connected to the network. Using triangulation you could be located through walls etc to a high accuracy range. A lot of items we own have rfid tags.