Defense says jurors had ‘agreement’ to find Karen Read ‘not guilty’ of murder charge

No video

Defense says jurors had ‘agreement’ to find Karen Read ‘not guilty’ of murder charge

Рет қаралды 3,680

26 күн бұрын

Lawyers for Karen Read filed a motion to dismiss two of the three criminal charges that she faces in connection with the death of her Boston police officer boyfriend John O’Keefe.
Read the full story: www.boston25news.com/news/loc...

Пікірлер: 43

@RatTerminator 23 күн бұрын

Guilty murder 2 🤬

@kgraham5820 23 күн бұрын

Old Bev needs to get on this!! She either dropped the ball, or done this bs on purpose! I trust her about as much as I do JM, which is ZERO. The jury SHOULD HAVE BEEN HEARD and they still should!! IF their decision was NOT GUILTY, it should be respected!!!

@Fazzel 24 күн бұрын

A 4th juror has now come forward to say they were in agreement "Not Guilty" on the murder charge.

@catherinetierney4834 23 күн бұрын

@@Fazzel ok yet the defense team has no names no jurors have come forward… so believe the defense attorneys who will do and say whatever they need to in order to get their client free

@OctoberGirl1009 23 күн бұрын

@@catherinetierney4834 these jurors reached out to the defense!

@cookieramlall9178 23 күн бұрын

What a waste of money for the city another publicity stunt😮

@MLA56 21 күн бұрын

IF they all said Not Guilty on Count #3, they COULDN'T say she was Guilty on Count #2. I suspect the "intoxicated" part of Charge #2 is what led to confusion. OR the Jury was FIXED somehow. By "stacking" the jury, which means dismissing jurors thought to be leaning toward Acquittal and replacing them with pro-prosecution jurors. This was done by Defense manipulation in the OJ Simpson trial back in 1995. THIS TIME, it required the Judge and the Clerk. OR someone "got to" one or more jurors. Keep in mind that these Jurors weren't sequestered during the trial NOR during Deliberation. It'd also include the BLATANT Jury Intimidation during Closing Arguments. NO ETHICAL JUDGE would've allowed it.

@catherinetierney4834 23 күн бұрын

They have so much insider info …‘not !! Stop buying this crap

@georgewashington3555 24 күн бұрын

New Microdots : Judge & DA in Karen Read Case Directly Linked

@joyh3086 25 күн бұрын

The saga continues…

@stevenlotti5539 25 күн бұрын

The DEFENSE attorneys should have clarified the status of ALL the charges that the jury were deliberating.

@danielarafalt2144 25 күн бұрын

First and foremost, though, this would have been the job of the judge.

@blueyedevil3479 24 күн бұрын

They attempted to… the judge said her instructions were sufficient and proceeded without heading the defense request

@OctoberGirl1009 24 күн бұрын

It’s up the judge!

@lindawade4ok639 24 күн бұрын

Are you kidding did you watch this trial because the judge hated the defense and wouldn't let them clarify those charges, or how to fill out the form. This has to be one of the most horrific judges I've ever seen in my life in action

@joanneyoung1081 24 күн бұрын

That was a strange ; the verdict sounded the jury was a hung jury on all charges wasn’t the foreman suppose to have explained the count in detail. Not sure myself. The biggest charge was eliminated. We did not know that til much later.

@georgewashington3555 25 күн бұрын

These dirty people if they did not think of Blaming Karen read.. they would of picked on Lucky as a victim of their false Blaming. Lucky the Plow driver.

@EC-dz3fb 25 күн бұрын

"would 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲."

@zigfriedsmother 25 күн бұрын

@@EC-dz3fb”would of” is a satisfactory colloquialism.

@EC-dz3fb 24 күн бұрын

@@zigfriedsmother Not at all, as "would've" is the correct contracted form of "would" and "have." Although "would've" and "would of" are phonetically similar, they're vastly different parts of speech.

@zigfriedsmother 16 күн бұрын

@@EC-dz3fb ah yes, the beauty of the colloquialism…no rules