It doesn’t show on Amazon UK do you know when it will be available?

@@CurleeToesAppreciate the interest, but I'm afraid not. It's common for Dell to hold Alienware flagships like this as exclusives on their own site for a few months before supplying to additonal retailers.

It doesn’t show on Amazon Canada do you know when it will be available?

@@orvilleswearing334 Afraid not. As usual for flagship Alienware monitors it'll be available from Dell directly for a little bit before reaching Amazon.

I ordered mine from Dell on March 21st coming April 16th :)

Yes, it is true. Maybe if this channel were more funny, it would be more popular (I don’t mind the presentation; for me, it’s excellent), but most people demand excitement, a lot of entertainment.

@@socialreport2836 also not everyone has 1 hour to watch a video about monitor on the channel they see for the first time.

Yup, I make content I enjoy in the style I like and don't chase the algorithm. This does reduce the potential audience (monitors + very detailed and long videos = a niche within a niche), but it is sustainable and I appreciate the community I generate from it here. 🙂

No disrespect there is still one guy and in my opinion he is the most accurate reviewer on yt for tv’s and monitors search for it. HDTVTest 👍🏼 still this is also an great review

Indeed the best Monitor channel on KZfaq. I love the way everything is described in detail. That's why im i'm subscribed since years.

Great to see, glad you appreciate all the information. 😄

so, have you subscribed or not?

Is that only in DP? HDMI 2.1 isn't detecting gsync in Nvidia control panel.

Lol the fuck. I'm a little jealous but I have been gaming on it since it came out

Glad you liked it!

I haven't observed anything OLED-specific of that nature so I'm not sure what you're describing there. Vertical banding could be related to high frequency low amplitude oscillation of the backlight. Or just vertical banding due to alternating darker and somewhat brighter shades and there being less perceived blur to mask eye movement on an OLED. Or possibly you're describing a DSE (Dirty Screen Effect) phenomenon which IS quite common though not unique to OLED - and as covered in the conclusion not an issue on this one.

vrr isn't that present only with g-sync enabled?

@@urkent4463VRR = Variable Refresh Rate. So G-SYNC is an example of that, yes.

@@PCMonitors Sorry for the late response. I was referring to poor uniformity on dark colors such as a 5% gray field. Most OLED TVs and monitors will show darker or lighter gray streaks running up and down the screen instead of a uniform gray across the whole panel. Such uniformity issues become very obvious when panning camera in many dark games like the examples I listed. This OLED issue is rarely mentioned by anyone but HDTVtest and Rtings. Hopefully more awareness will push display manufacturers to improve in this area. Thanks.

@@jackw9568So that's DSE, which I do assess and where applicable (some VA and OLED models) cover and demonstrate. I didn't have an issue with it on my unit, as mentioned in the conclusion. 1:09:07.

Yeah, custom resolutions are complicated due to DSC. Which is why Nvidia Control Panel doesn't even allow creation of them on monitors like this with DSC active. But if you use CRU or an alternative means to create them there will be restrictions.

@@PCMonitors ah ok, thanks! For nvidia gpus, you can actually activate the old Image Sharpening menu instead of the new Image Scaling. It requires a small edit in the registry. This older technique also comes with Lanczos as the scaling filter, so it's pretty great. Does this perhaps work instead? I never had a DSC monitor so I unfortunately can't test :/

It has been very slightly improved, but as a previous owner of the AW3423DW I can't say the difference is at all dramatic. I did some side by side testing and the screen surface looked extremely similar in most cases and I'd say the size difference accounted for a lot of screen surface behaviour difference I might've observed.

@PCMonitors thank you for your input! The raised blacks drove me insane since I was unable to control my room's ambient light, so I ended up selling my AW3423DWF. Also have you noticed the qd oled TVs tend to perform quite a bit better compared to the monitor versions with this issue?

I don't have experience with the TV side, but the panel technology and lack of outer polarizer is the same and based on testing from RTINGS etc. it seems to suffer to the same degree. It could be more about the size and curvature of the screen.

What about the 27 version or 32 msi?

@@mjregan88 I only have experience with the 32 inch AW, forgive me

Yeah it's difficult to compare the X27 with the OLEDs because their strengths are in very different areas. Bright scene HDR performance is definitely better on the X27. But the colour reproduciton, responsiveness and HDR performance where darker shades dominate is much better on the QD-OLEDs. The differences between the QD-OLEDs themselves are far subtler and I'd generally recommend going with the one that's cheapest in your region. So far they all look pretty solid.

I think this monitor gives a very nice experience even if you just consider it limited to 120Hz. And that's what you'd get on the PS5. There aren't any models coming out this year that would provide a superior experience, really.

Thanks for the quick reply I will pick one up soon.

I bought a 4080 super when it came out to push this thing.

No, won't be looking at that model. Just this one and the MSI version planned for now.

You're missing it, the review isn't! It's even timestamped.

Yes. 'FreeSync Premium Pro' is just a confusing AMD-specific certification which sometimes involves its own 'HDR pipeline' - this just makes a few tweaks to the HDR experience (not usually good ones). You do NOT need FreeSync Premium Pro or even any specific FreeSync certification to use HDR + VRR with an AMD GPU, so your experience will be similar to an Nvidia user here.

How do you find those scenes with the 'DisplayHDR True Black 400' style setting(s)? The ABL behaviour is there due to power limitations with the technology, it's not going to change with a firmware update. The 'DisplayHDR True Black 400' mode is more accurate with its PQ tracking and will show what the panel can technically do in terms of brightness in such scenes. If you still find things too dim that's truly the ABL behaviour you're observing, if not then it's because of the over-dimming of mid-tones with the 'HDR Peak 1000' setting.

Yes, OLEDs have very little perceived blur from the pixel response element to mask a natural 'juddering' you'd see from such frame rates. Whether this is actually bothersome or not is very subjective, though. Probably have to see for yourself, I wouldn't give up on the QD-OLED experience based on something you may not have an issue with.

@@PCMonitorsThanks, yea i think i would order from a place with a gooood return policy, haha.

Yeah, both models have distinct strengths in HDR. I can't guarantee no 'burn-in' for heavy productivity usage, either. Though I use QD-OLEDs myself (AW3423DW for a few years, now swapped to this one) without issue, including for a fair bit of productivity. I make sure the screens turns off (via Windows power management) after 3 minutes of inactivity and I use a dark taskbar and desktop theme, but don't take additional precuations - aside from making sure it runs the scheduled cleaning cycles. I treat it largely like I would an LCD. I personally think it's worth the risk given the warranty coverage and obvious strengths in other areas.

Thank you! I really think your reviews are the best btw. People can make a fully informed decision to buy or not any particular display based only on your review because of the amount of detail and thoughtfulness you put into them, consistently covering and clearly demonstrating all possible considerations (rather than just transmitting overall impressions). Consumers need this level of detail before forking out such amounts of money for devices that are meant to be used on a daily basis and for a significant amount of time. Keep up the brilliant work!

Thanks - I appreciate the feedback and glad to see the detailed reviews are helpful!

Did you replace the PG32UQX?

@@DrakonR No, I use it for work as well as gaming, I would not be comfortable yet working on an OLED for hours on end as I do on the PG32UQX, I would be too scared of burn in. Also I own an LG C1 which I use as a second monitor so, for games that would look poorly on the PG32UQX because of blooming, I can always switch to the C1. So it would not make much sense at the moment for my use case, not to mention financially. And there is always the brightness of the PG32UQX which is fantastic, like bright daylight scenes in HDR feel like you are actually outdoors.

If that's their estimate that's their estimate. It entirely depends when you order and how their demand and supply curves are shaping out. Mine came slightly before estimated, but I ordered it as soon as it was available.

I noticed it in much the same way with HDMI 2.1, though testing with that was quite brief. I will test this again more exensively when I get a chance.

I have now tested this extensively and can confirm VRR flickering was no different using HDMI 2.1 vs. DP 1.4. The monitor is only 'G-SYNC Compatible certified' via DP - which makes no difference to how it performs, but means the technology is only active by default via DP. It's possible somebody was using HDMI 2.1 without actually activating VRR and thought it was active, if they observed a significant difference in (or indeed no) VRR flickering.

​@@PCMonitorsthanks for following up. Have you noticed if limiting the refresh rate to 120 helps with flicker? Might be an option if playing a single player game where you can't max out the refresh rate anyway.

@@lsik231l VRR flickering is reduced if fluctuations are reduced. So if limiting your refresh rate does that then great. But if your frame rate doesn't pass 120fps either way, it won't make a difference.

​@PCMonitors great! Really appreciate you investing your time on this! I recently got the monitor and so far really do love it. I ended up using DP as I found using hdmi caused random artifacting that I read was a problem but only if refresh rate was set at 240hz. 120hz eliminated artifacting at least with my monitor.

It will be quite the upgrade when the time comes!

It should give a very similar experience, both technologies use Adaptive-Sync and the certification is just marketing.

Yes, it's the brightness of white and any deeper shade will have a lower brightness. That's the maximum brightness that any shade will appear on the monitor (it's the same way on any monitor, regardless of panel technology). Games won't necessarily look 50% dimmer, though, because perceived brightness involves a lot more than just measured white luminance. For example the screen surface and exceptional consistency plus exceptional contrast of this model works in its favour to enhance perceived brightness, in the right lighting.

@@PCMonitors Thanks for the clarification. I thought maybe ABL would make the difference between a white rectangle and the sky a bit smaller, but I guess those new OLEDs don't use ABL anymore. When I got the AOC Q27G3XMN (mostly due to your review), I realized I like ~70% brightness for daytime gaming, which is ~400 nits white-rectangle brightness. I tried setting 45% brightness to simulate a QD-OLED (I used a light meter app to estimate that 45% brightness puts out about 250 nits on white) and while I can see everything just fine, I find the image much duller and less lifelike. I am flabbergasted by this, because I've always pooh-poohed high brightness on displays for ergonomic reasons. Turns out what's too bright for desktop use can be too dim for gaming/video use!

You should watch the review, at least the conclusion.

Appreciate the interest, but no plans to review the ASUS I'm afraid. Will be reviewing the MSI version (which is better value than the ASUS in the US) and don't intend to review 3 models using the same panel, especially when performance seems so similar in most respects.

@@PCMonitorsokay, a man can dream. I was thinking about pg32ucdm since there is a graphite layer and fully passive heatsink - it could be better in the hdr due to not that aggressive abl and by having some extra brightness in the sdt mode. Thank you for your hard work.

@@ALFGamingTVYou're welcome! According to Monitors Unboxed and TFT Central testing, the ABL behaviour for HDR is very similar. But yes as usual for ASUS OLEDs with 'Uniform Brightness' enabled more stable brightness for SDR. The MSI is also passively cooled (graphene film), though they don't market as aggressively as ASUS. 🙂

Is this the best oled for text clarity? I need an oled that I can do productivity on . How is the MSI?

I don't know if its the BEST but I have absolutely no issues running it for like 50% of the time I'm just doing text based stuff and thats with zero work arounds of effort apart from using windows high contrast mode which is amazing on oled and a must to do I also have an AMOLED panel for my laptop and have zero issues with it either @@mjregan88

the only time you notice it is when your doing like browsing or office stuff and its actuall nice cause you don't burn your eyes out when some app/website that doesn't have dark mode lights up DLAA and a low or off ansio looks best imo

I was actually asking the same question. I use LG g3

Tough to say for sure, but I suspect the closer viewing distance will help provide a suitable perceived brightness and 'pop' which won't disappoint compared to your TV.

​@@PCMonitors thanks for the reply. Are the color gamut/volume on these monitors also worse compared to tvs? I wonder why. They have gen 3 qd oled panels while tvs only have the gen 2.

@@vmd1293The tuning seems to be slightly different, perhaps. DCI-P3 is similar, ~99% for both. Adobe RGB and Rec. 2020 is also slightly lower on this one compared to the PG49WCDM I looked at. Visually there's very little difference you'd notice, though. Different software and devices can measure a slightly different gamut, but all of the QD-OLEDs (TVs or monitors) are ~80 - 85% Rec. 2020 so within fairly similar range really.

This is covered in the review.

Honestly - it makes no difference to the experience, it's just a certification used for marketing purposes. Actually sometimes being 'FreeSync Premium Pro' certified can be a negative as it sometimes causes the monitor to use a separate and usually worse-calibrated HDR pipeline.

As noted in the video, it's very subjective and depends on the scenario and how much for frame rate is fluctuating. I don't find it bothersome - I do on some VA models for example where it's stronger and I'd sometimes even want to disable VRR simply because of the flickering.

@@PCMonitors I see. Thank you.

When you say "a comparison" - in what context? If you mean based on a synthetic test (like the VRR flickering test or the way RTINGS tests this) then don't put too much weight into that. It's a very artificial testing scenario and VRR flickering can vary in intensity and how potentially noticeable it can be depending on the exact fluctuations occuring. I found it slightly less noticeable during normal gameplay in various scenes on this model compared to various WOLED models I've tested, but I wouldn't say it's a huge difference... It can also vary between individual models - so either way I can't claim QD-OLED > WOLED for VRR flickering. In my experience talking to people who have tested or used various OLED monitors, VRR flickering is generally just something you're sensitive to and will notice (regardless of which OLED you're looking at) or you won't. Or you might notice it and not find it bothersome. The only model I've used which I'd say has any real edge in this respect for 'normal gaming' is the AW3423DW and that's because of some compensation performed by the G-SYNC module. But for some people even that level of VRR flickering is annoying.

@@PCMonitors kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prp8d9WHss3eqoU.html

Interesting. As I said it depends on the exact model so I don't think it's right to bundle together "QD-OLED" and "WOLED" but rather consider the model itself. I also find cameras poor at reflecting what your eyes see in terms of flickering. I've observed very similar situations on Cyberpunk where the camera will detect very small gamma changes which aren't observed by eye. And even in the VRR flickering test it's picking up fluctuations at parts of the gradient or in ways your eyes just don't perceive flicker. I'd also stress that the monitors in that video you posted are set up very differently - the poster of the video states in a comment: "Samsung was in its sRGB clamp mode, I had to put the WOLED in FPS preset to raise gamma so it doesn't look so dark on camera. The FPS preset doesn't clamp to sRGB so its oversaturated." Nonetheless, I still got the impression they generally observed stronger VRR flicker on the QD-OLED he tested than on the WOLED (though I don't know how close his calibration was when he observed them and how much of this he was just modifying for the sake of the video). Now I don't know if the Samsung G80SD is just particularly poor in this respect, but the pretty much constant low level flickering detected by the camera may not be observed at all by eye. It's usually the sudden and more significant brightness fluctuations ('obvious flicker') which is more troublesome and I tend to notice that more on WOLED models than on the AW3225QF. That certainly doesn't mean all QD-OLEDs vs. all WOLED models and depending on sensitivity to flickering and your room lighting, smaller and more frequent fluctuations could be an issue. Either way, I will be more careful in future reviews to try not to generalise the VRR flicker levels of QD-OLED vs WOLED or perpetuate those kinds of thoughts. Going back to the AW3225QF, I doubt there will be many people who would find it fine for VRR flickering but find a 240Hz WOLED obnoxious in that respect. Nor the other way around. Edit: Further thoughts shared here - forum.pcmonitors.info/topic/qd-oled-vs-woled-vrr-flickering/.

Don't believe it is, seems to be a current US only promotion.

I want to know as well

Nothing too spectacular. Windows 11 PC with RTX 3090 GPU, i7 12700K, 32GB RAM.

I don't personally find bright-dominant scenes overwhelming on Mini LED solutions which will raise brightness much more than on this model. Even there the whole scene is not at a high brightness, it's just certain sections of it. Because of the contrast you could also argue that smaller bright highlights (which QD-OLED presents with very high brightness) surrounded by darkness are more impactful or potentially uncomfortable to look at. Everyone has their own sensitivity to brightness though, I think multiple options with different brightness levels is the best approach. I don't like the representation of HDR on models like the EX2780Q without local dimming (or with very ineffective local dimming) because the whole scene is flooded and everything is raised up more than it should be, not just the brightest elements. I don't think the experience is really comparable to a 'proper' HDR experience even if just considering viewing comfort.

@@PCMonitorsinteresting, i have no reference to actual hdr monitors, apart from my evo oled tv, so i can't comment on that. however, i ordered the aw3225qf as soon as i finished your review :) can't wait to finally have a look at content in 4k and hdr when on the computer *_*

Per the review the reasonably subtle curve was not a particular issue for me either way, but it's subjective.

Back up a bit and you'll see I was showing and talking about 2560 x 1440 (QHD) which is not the native resolution of the monitor. So what I'm saying is when the AW3225QF is running 2560 x 1440, it's softer than a monitor that has a native resolution of 2560 x 1440 and is the same size.

@@PCMonitorsso if i was to buy this, you could set in game resolution to 1440p?

@@bledarrm7976Sure, it will run up to the monitors highest resolution, so anything the game supports up to that. There are differences in performance for different resolutions though.

@@PCMonitorsi mean a 1440p Video does look better on 4k than on 1440p. thats for shure 1440p pixel density in particular resolution is a joke to 4k

I wouldn't hold your breath for that. It's inherent to OLED panels and it seems no manufacurer (panel or monitor) has worked out how to do this.

Does what mean that? 3840 x 2160 @240Hz via DP is specifically shown at the beginning of the 'Refresh Rates & Scaling' section: 2:40

@@PCMonitors i'm sorry for not being clear enough. The sentence at 3:03 "if you use hdmi you get up to 240hz" sounds to me as if you cant get 240hz on dp. Sorry for that one sir. Just wanna make sure before i buy something :D

It's a long video, it's easy to miss or misinterpret bits so no worries.

If you ask nicely.

@@PCMonitors please :)

Here you go, enjoy! backiee.com/wallpaper/nature/54336

It was fine with our RTX 3090, not sure what the issue would be (if there is one). Maybe something Dell needs to work out with Nvidia if so. But PC users can use DP 1.4 without issue anyway, so I don't see the problem.

Assuming you're actually running at 540fps, the ASUS should have an edge overall because of much lower perceived blur due to eye movement. Might be some transitions where the OLED would have an edge simply due to the visually instantaneous pixel responses vs. slightly below optimal for some transitions on the ASUS, though.

@@PCMonitors any plans to review the dual mode 4k @ 240hz and 1080p @ 480hz oled lg monitor that releases next month ?

@@ployth9000 Probably not as it's an LG and they don't have a functional UK PR department. Can't really justify purchasing that one myself at the moment.

@@PCMonitors ok well what about the samsung odyssey neo g9 57 I have been waiting for either you tftcentral or monitors unboxed to review it I have been using it and enjoying it but would be nice to see more people reviewing it.

@@ployth9000 Same applies to Samsung I'm afraid, not easy to work with. And that's beyond the size limit of screen I'd generally consider reviewing.

You might be used to bright monitors and may need to adjust to a more limited brightness level. Or try to. It's also worth working on room lighting if you can, perhaps that's too bright.

What made you get that over 32 or the 27 MSI?

It depends how stable the frame rate is, not specifically how low it is. The main problem you'd notice there would be if it frequently dips below and rises above the LFC boundary (so it's dipping below perhaps 55fps and rising above that).

@@PCMonitors Thanks for replying, exciting times for pc monitors ahead

"Desktop" is just another preset of the monitor, briefly covered in the "Best Settings" video - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hJ6bY5aLssWmpo0.html. Dell Display Manager isn't specific to this model and not covered in these videos. Though is briefly touched upon in the OSD video - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kL-WfLyHmbLVgX0.htmlsi=hxjHUHA95SX39SG_&t=1406.

@@PCMonitors hmmmmm. I guess im looking for deep dive summary table of nits and color accuracy like you did for creator and standard as it relates to your PC settings. Like comparing your findings for the creator mode and Hdr with leaving standard and toggling display settings in PC settings (brightness, HDR on/off ICC changing system profiles). On Display manager side. I would like to see if application mode and dynamic sync works with this model.

@chevonpetgrave4991 Right, you're looking for something reviewers don't realistically have time or inclination to cover. It's not practical or particularly useful to take measurements using every preset - they typically make a few (sometimes undesirable) changes to the image or are so similar to the standard or default setting that they aren't worth exploring. The presets I focus on are selected for good reason. The impact of the full native colour gamut and how it impacts the image, which is extremely important, is explored in the review. As are the characteristics of the only SDR presets which don't use that gamut (Creator Mode colour space settings). Display Manager is software which is available for a range of monitors and isn't a core aspect of the monitor itself or its performance.

Totally get that. I guess I waskibg conversafionally not for a reviee video. In testing the viability of these for a color managed editing workflow that depends on high contrast ratios high peek brightness and specific black levels which this monitor checks off at a reasonable price. Just wanted to pick your brain on what I would be getting myself into workflow wise. Fom my research on another dell monitor ultrasharp series I envision using the Dell Display Manager to control auto sync icc profiles with the system. Making sure any monitor profile is sycned with what the system is outputting is critical for working in davinci resolve. I do it manually (first from my system settings and then have to do the same on display osd) on my lame monitor now. But ben q and dell have series that will match the counterpart automatically when you either switch on the osd end or system settings end. Additionally based on the application you’re in you can even switch as you open a new app to jump into a new color space and sync all in one move (open the application). I was going to go the ultra sharp rout for price for features but saw that this monitor does oled and hdr. At first i was like. Oh thats a gaming monitor it probalby doesnt have that capability to work with display manager. But when i saw in the spec sheet that it is compatible, i stsrted to wonder what is possible. That’s where im coming from for some contex😂.

Yeah, that makes sense. Well it definitely works with Dell Display Manager and as far as I'm aware associated features should work. The ICC profile switching section of DDM was shown in the OSD video, it's definitely accessible.

Yes, I agree and that's a good point. I actually recorded a piece where I said it was exaggerated on the video. And you can see this odd 'pincushion' effect in the centre. But I edited this out (didn't mean to cut so much from the edit of that section).

It isn't in the UK and Europe. Not sure why they priced it as they did in the US, but it is what it is.

Because it's "cool" and the kids love it! But as I say in the review, it's pretty subtle. Draws you in a little bit, can aid immersion slightly. But personally agree the curves are best kept to ultrawides. On 16:9 they're either subtle and have limited effect (like this) but could still be annoying to some on the desktop... Or they can be too steep and annoying a lot of the time.

@@PCMonitors thanks for the answer... this is my first pass on the review... I'll see it a second time and there may be other questions :D

agree, (subtle) curves have their place, but not on a 32" (imo). I will say I am on a 42 C2 and I *definitely* miss the slight curve my old 34" ultrawide had...

I would say by 99% i am sure this was done by dellineware in 32 inch format for marketing purpose only. To stand above the crowd and having +1 reason to sell it as a gamer monitor. It is good thing since you have a lot to chose from -like the chosen one pg32ucdm, but if you can get this for 800-900$ compared to 1300$ asus, with 3 years advanced warranty, i would say curve in not important then 😂

Could still give a really nice experience. Basically as shown but limited to 120Hz maximum (and generally lower frame rates - depends on game). So a lot of excellent image quality characteristics to enjoy, still.

VRR flickering is covered in the review and I share my subjective impressions. And it is indeed subjective - you may or may not find it bothersome. It depends on the exact scene and fluctuations occuring, the room lighting, monitor brightness and your sensitivity to flickering.

@@TheSpiral01 They use an artificial 'torture-test' style of testing which is a poor representation of what you can expect in real world scenarios. I find VRR flickeirng more obvious for WOLED than QD-OLED in general, it just seems more intense to me for some reason.

Which wallpaper?

No, as covered in the review it doesn't.

@@PCMonitorsdamn what a shame

Would depend on pricing in your region and your preference for the curve and aesthetics, really. They're both excellent performers.

@@PCMonitors in Germany 1499 Euro for Asus Rog

Alienware for the better warranty

Very much the same as in games, which are explored in great subjective detail here. That's under SDR at least - refer to the HDR section for discussion on 'Dolby Vision' vs 'HDR 10' as it applies to movies.

@@PCMonitors What if streaming movies like very compressed, F2 Movies for instance ? I can only find Alienware 4k OLED monitor. No Samsung and LG.

The monitor doesn't "filter" the content in any special way. Unlike TVs monitors don't include 'denoise' filters etc... So it entirely depends on the content. You still benefit from the exceptional contrast and colour performance, even if you see some compression artifacts in places. The gamma tracking on the monitor is good and it masks these artifacts 'appropriately' with the '2.2' standard in mind. It also offers alternative gamma settings if you wish to mask them more.

@@PCMonitors Ok noted. What is the difference between this alienware 4k OLED as oppose to TV 4k OLED for movies in general ?

The TV can add a lot of processing and filtering (per my previous reply), the monitor shows things more as intended. But both monitors and TVs have various settings that can be configured to make things more or less "as intended".

As I said, it can and does appear in games at various points. It's impossible to show you on camera how it would appear by eye and much more difficult to show in game than using that test. The test is simply to demonstrate the phenomenon. In practice the flickering is very subjective and scenario dependent - it depends on the fluctuations occuring, the shade makeup of the scene and your own sensitivity. So demonstrating it in a game wouldn't be any more helpful or insightful than this test in my view. Still, I'll keep it in mind for future reviews (which will include QD-OLEDs) and can maybe show it for a loading screen or something as well.

What are you trying to do via USB, specifically?

It doesn't have PWM dimming, but as covered in the responsiveness section they use high frequency low amplitude oscillation. The brightness fluctuations are far smaller than traditional PWM, but I'm sorry you're sensitive to that.

mmhhh got mine just yesterday and - who would have known - much better at night compared to my Omen x27 LED's at night which 'dimscreen' couln't dim as good as on OLED. may you set it higher in brightness ans dim it via software?

That's not possible at the moment. The panel needs at least some bezel to help keep everything else in place and offer a degree of protection.

@@PCMonitors at least on the left right side bezel

@@antayudi5428Still not possible, you can't just protect or sandwhich together at the top and bottom.

@@PCMonitors it will be possible with micro LED monitor in near future, not with OLED monitor....is it true?

@@antayudi5428 No.

abolutely not found myself in a pleasure chatting in twitch fullscreen, cause the edge is nearer

also the curve is kinda perfect or better cause the side of the panel are same distance to the eyes as the middle of the screen

@@urkent4463 not for me. currently i have curved 32" and did not get used to distortions in three years. Color uniformity is a joke on bend screens.

On curved OLEDs that's not a factor. And how steep is the curve on your 32" LCD? 1000R perhaps? Nothing like this Alienware.

I think it's probably a good mix for what you want to use it for, maybe keep hold of your AW2725DF in case it doesn't work out but give it a go and see for yourself?

had the same issue, the 360 is nice but not workable regarding text fringe for work tasks. i just swapped to the aw322 and the text fringe is gone. i can finnaly do some work and game on one monitor:)

@@Gates-Tech for me personally i am currently using the AW2725DF for work stuff and it looks fine for me. Same as when i was using the AW3423DWF ultrawide qd oled. works perfectly fine for me for work and the extra real estate space on the ultrawide helps with split screen. Only reason i am itching to get AW3223QF is just for fun hehe.. i guess my eyes are not susceptible to text fringing. Even on the older gen 1 qd oled panel on the ultrawide, i cant see it at all.

It is 'G-SYNC Compatible' certified already and was at time of review - pcmonitors.info/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/AW3225QF-G-SYNC-Compatible-certified.png. This certification has nothing whatsoever to do with fixing the OLED flickering, because as far as I'm concerned Nvidia can't. Even their AW3423DW (G-SYNC module) exhibits some VRR flickering. The flickering is very subjective and scenario dependent, it's explained the best I can in the review. It depends on the fluctuations occuring, the shade makeup of the scene and your own sensitivity. The Neo G7 has the issue, by the way - refer to our review. This is a much better monitor, I'd suggest you just try it and see for yourself instead of worrying about something that may not be an issue for you.