yep

I have 6 years of experience but i feel no different than you 🤣

Lol same

the sound is absolutely yikes

rel

Ik the pain but its fun

I love how accurate it is

How we going now champ?

the code is by-product of your thoughts and solution, 4 months is a lot of time to learn coding, if you are 16+ and took 4 months to learn coding for the first time you are not giving you're all effort. solving and describe your self in code, this will take lot of practice. just learning coding alone is just 3 weeks is a max time.

@@pchandu1995 dawg what-- it's a continuous learning how to code--same way Technology grows.

@@mrkatking1 He's making a distinction between coding and problem solving. When we program, we solve problems, and then we code the solution we found. Problem solving is a continuous learning, that's for sure. So is coding, but it's much more trivial.

@@pchandu1995 he meant programming, not learning syntax...

lmao

Nan

This is competetive programming, people usually dont code this fast.

No one code that fast in the industry. It's pointless.

Guys like this are top 1%. Most people seat all day and write simple CRUDs all day.

was just thinking of the time the journalists told the coal miners to just "learn to code" LOL

For part 1 I was concerned that something outside +/- 50 could end up inside, but looks like that didn't happen. For part 2, should still work.

@@NealWuProgramming thanks!

😂😂😂

On/off 1/0 treated as boolean as easier to check for truth than integer equality check

I know the answer to this

he just wanted to do: A[-50][-50][-50]. This is negative array indexing. Note that the coordinates are given from -50 to 50. The trick is to use the fact that C store arrays in contiguous spaces so it's possible to do A[-1] which will points to one address before the first element. It's easier to understand for 1d since no 2d recasting shenanigans are needed. In a 1D case, if you want to use an array for -50 to 50: bool original_addressed[101]; bool* negative_addressed = (bool*) &original_addressed[50]; In this example, negative_addressed[0] is like calling original_addressed[50], which is ok. If you do negative_addressed[-50], this will fetch 50 adresses before the head of the pointer which happens to be at: original_addressed[50-50] = original_addressed[0] It's just like considering the array to start at the middle and values are spread left and right. If you don't do so, you need to always add 50 so that -50 becomes 0 and 0 becomes 50 etc. Which might makes logic a bit more fuzzier. For 3D-case, you just need to figure out the starting address. Hope that helped.

That is one ugly typecast! This is why people don't like C--. Seems like he typed a lot of characters to avoid having to type "+N" 3 times in 3 array index brackets.

That auto complete is done by lsp + clangd

@@Nocturnal_darkness Thank you!!

They are counted twice he just subtracts an iteration

Competitive programming is a beast of its own. Nobody codes like this in industry, at least what I've known. This guy does 2 things : knows how to solve complex problems (like at math olympiad), and codes his solutions (loops and some basic stuff) very fast. Yes, this is impressive and takes some training, but it is more of a sport , than real coding.

I don't know how he types stuff like [x][y][z] so fast, my right pinky always misses the correct bracket key

Brain.

Kanka sublime'da bilmiyorum ama vscode'da alt+left click ile yapabiliyorsun. Sublime multiple cursor diye aratabilirsin.

Update?

@@mr.jacobgalesburg1465 I won a java coding challenge in my school🤙, but there is still more room to improve, I still don't think I'm on your level

I want to say it’s Ubuntu

@@freethinkermentality8175 thank you, sir

C++