Well maybe if the system wasn't run by salty prunes he'd have a surefire chance at freedom. The system is corrupt and proves why people never turn away from crime

FRFR

He’s going to be fine. Everyone is happy he deleted the super gremlin. Now society has one less monster to deal with.

He won't. There's doorbell camera evidence. The Law has no choice but to release him with no charges.

@LactoseTheIntolerant in Florida, he would be immediately red flagged per the school shooting state law

Agree🙌🏻

everyone living in the US is a psychopath

San Jose California: This man has complete conservative support on this one! Well done O.G., well done!👊😔🇺🇲

@@neverthatserious8870 yo wtf. Lock the schools down you're dangerous SAVE THE KIDS!!

That was my first thought. Poor seasoned man deserves rest and relaxation, not this

They didn't. It was all fresh and it's all standard procedures. That's what they'll say in any case. This old man was clearly in the right.

Luckily this isn't New York city

​@@mojointhemancave2703yea liberals are horrible and ruin everything

@@mojointhemancave2703 which is one of the reasons I’m no longer a NYC resident after almost 49 years.

Amen.

It’s the intruders fault

@@badadmk7880 he said its the intruders fault. repeating what the original comment said

@@badadmk7880 delete your comment

We're you there

He saved the tax payers a lot of money!

GOD bless America 😊

@@Mr88cutty if u watched the video you wouldve heard the intruder busted the back window and was about the enter through the back so the old man came out the front

@@dopeboydreamz7005 I definitely watched the video Michigan is not a stand your ground state if he busted the window and wasn't in the house and you weren't in any immediate danger and you could have fled to a different area instead of confronting him I don't make the laws and I no Kim worthy is a real bitch that's all I'm saying and that's questions she will ask

LOVE WHEN THE BAD BLEED OUT

@@Mr88cutty He said he opened his door and told the man to leave. Castle law still considers this justifiable as long as he remained inside the doorway of his home.

Agree with you 100% .

Now if he wasn’t legal to carry but did the exact same move, would he be a bad guy?

Total crap to arrest the homeowner or to take into custody. police have no right to grab and cuff someone who is cooperating and is standing ground at the home. Unless there is a witness or video that provides evidence of the homeowner taking illegal action, hands off.

@@michaeldobson8859 definitely has no idea what he is talking about and using EMOTIONS/FEELINGS on a matter instead of LOGIC and PROCEDURES! In a murder (justified or not in HINDSIGHT) PD DOES have the right to detain you for questioning during their initial investigation when you're the main subject of said investigation of a murder sitting in front of their faces. Just standard procedure until they figure out what's going on...being detained is NOT the same as being arrested, being taken to jail, or catching a charge. You sound like the type that would trip about LEOs handcuffing subjects they just shot because you can't be bothered to research/learn why that procedure is STANDARD in a combat situation. Instead you'd let your FEELINGS on the matter do the talking for you and then proceed to think LEOs are just horrible people.

@@frenchy2410 NO! He doesn't need a permit to carry a gun on his property.

Good thing he had that ringcam video, too!

Why would you need a license to carry on your own property?

You don't need license carry on your own property. But looks like this gentleman purchased his firearm legally and knows how to handle it properly under stress.

He wasn’t supposed to go outside

@@staymadloser7754 I mean personally I wouldn’t pursue an armed guy like he did but it is his property. 🤷🏽‍♂️

Fuck dude. He fuck with the right wrong person and got shot.

Yep

Hell i am 2A and this is not a good shooting. He had a choice to stay in the safety of his home , instead he opened the door and exposed himself to the danger by physically confrontation with an armed individual.

Exactly, Shame on Beetlelady and the prosecutor.

@@leftistnazicensorship8882 maybe that’d make sense if the criminal was stupidly let in by the homeowner, but he wasn’t. homeowner had every right to use a gun and isn’t responsible for the criminal trying to break in

Right we should put the proescutor in that situation then book them for manslaughter even if it’s out of defense

What da I miss the castle

the "System" aka Democrat Party😁

TRUE. 🦾🦾🦾🦾💯💯💯💯🌎🌎🌎🙏🙏🙏

Ignorant lmfao it’s the blue lives matter people who let these criminals out

Lol

EXACTLY. A democrat-controlled city is all too happy to the throw a black man in jail for defending himself. But they won't do shit about the criminals walking the streets with rap sheets longer than a Russian bread line.

@Fetus for Jesus I agree 100%. I just find it funny.

@Fetus for Jesus Sure thing. I'm sure he can just charge that lawyer to his platinum card.

So true. Notice the reported stated "he did what he 'thought' he had to do," already forming doubt in the public's mind.

@Max Powermissed the point weather he did or not he still had every right to shoot his ass 😭

@Max Power wether he lied or not the intruder had a gun so the man did what he had to do🤦🏾‍♂️end of discussion

@Max Power lol. You the dead dude's best friend? Stop making assumptions.

Pretty sure blm was inciting all of the violence there bud.

Now you're judging him by appearance? He is an older man who's owned the house for over 20 years. If the cops found him on drugs or drugs in his possession, he wouldnt have gotten released. Also, you would recognize other people around the neighborhood too if you've been in the house for over 20 years. It doesn't make it 'obvious' they were even acquainted.

Call 9-11

@@paleo704 he did call 911 but it’s not like they were at the neighbors house. Did you not watch the entire video? The guy had a gun and started breaking windows and wasn’t listening to the home owner. Play stupid games win stupid prizes. At least there’s one less gun toting criminal on the streets now

Nah you can rely on them to arrest you after the fact for threatening their Monopoly on violence.

@@Hcaz1113 wow

Stfu.. He wasnt a thug. clearly a man wit mental health issues.

Huh? Are you okay?

how do we know. just as a neutral observer, he bought a gun this year after 20 years living there and just happens to need it. against a person claiming he owes him money. Now ofc that person could be just out of his mind of confuse the address. but given the little facts we know, its possible he did owe the wrong person money and bought a gun because he felt threatened because of that. and when the guy came to collect he simply shot him. just you should never judge just based on a 2 min cut down clip, specially not with some red flags, in either direction. thats why police investigates

@@woswasdenni1914 he bought a gun this year? The reporter clearly says that he bought the gun 8 years ago why are making things up as a “neutral observer”

@@woswasdenni1914 He bought a gun 8 years ago, delete this comment 😭

@@woswasdenni1914 he bought the gun 8 years ago 😂 please delete this comment

@@woswasdenni1914 that's true as well. But if you go to someone's house in that way, something bad going to happen. Either way the guy seems justified in his actions. It's not like he went up to him on the streets and just blasted the guy.

"Hopeful that the law would be on his side." Imagine caring, in *this* regard...

Brainwashed anti-gun leftists would love to charge a good citizen for defending his life. Anti-gun leftists want guns banned, not put in good light where good people defend themselves with guns. They'll probably say that he should have waited for police, 🙄 and run around the house like a chicken. 🙄 When SECONDS count, police are just minutes away. If the teachers at Uvalde school had guns, they'd be alive today, and the children too. Anti-gun puppets don't want to think of THAT though. Anti-gun puppets are brainwashed by globalists to spread fear and hate of guns in good citizens hands. Globalists want to take the US down, so they can build their one world government in the future.

Democratic attorneys will disagree with you on that.

@@Bizniz22 now you are getting to the root of the problem

​@@Bizniz22 I agree, until one of their family members experiences it.

"fully within your rights as a law abiding person" corrected it for you. This has nothing to do with America.

IDK.. I can't talk for the USA but a barrister (lawyer) in the UK that I once met at a party said to me "never talk to the Police, the prisons are full of innocent people who did..." That barrister is now a judge..

The guy never pulled a gun until the homeowner came outside to confront him, escaleting the situation unneccessarily. The police were on their way, he should have stayed inside. If the man banging on the window actually began to enter through it, then he had a right to defend himself. He should have stayed inside.

@@teresayeates3437 Escalating the situation??!? Its 4:30 in the morning, did you see the video. That man wasn't playing! A homeowner has the right to walk outside in HIS YARD, an take measures. If this were me, as a single woman, I would have waited & waited until police arrived. But best believe if this crazy man would have even tried to come inside, I would shoot to protect my own. But hey, the man broke his window, and the homeowner made a decision. At that point what would you do?

As a ER nurse, I have had my encounters with few psych and drug oding patients during my career. I can honestly say the scariest I ever felt is when my friends boyfriend was banging on my door at 2am after she died. I knew he was a drug addict, but she kept him in control. I opened my door, and the eyes I seen terrified me. Then he just walked in my house. I was like 'Oh shit, boy done gone bat shit crazy and is in my house. He must leave now." So I ran outside with my phone and he followed me. I was able to call 911, and the cop who came, knew him well. He also just heard his GF died suddenly. So he asked if he felt he wanted to hurt himself. He said "I just want to sleep, like Aimee." So he agreed to go to the hospital with the officer. That was the last time I seen him. I was scared, felt powerless, and heart broken at the same time. I have a weapon, but never thought too get it. He banged so loud cause he's deaf and wasn't aware how loud he was..

@@voniarichardson7945 That dead person isn't deaf, your point is way off

maybe. maybe not.

I agree, the home owner is obviously not a bad guy. He just had to deal with a bad guy. I'm glad he's ok physically but I'm worried about his heart and soul. God bless.

They're not considering anything. It's just routine. Same way how if there's a police shooting, even if the bodycam shows that it's the most justified shooting ever and the suspect shot at the officer first, by automatic routine, the officer will be put on paid leave for a short while.

@@alexf9381 they don't put police in handcuff after shooting, while they investigating. glad he's ok

intruder's outfit and slingbag indicate he's ready for violent action, I think he would have been legally justified when the dude busted the window right then and there

Facts!

The homeowner had no clue as to what he was talking about. … but the guy was acting like he owed him money. Mental issue. Having a problem in your head is unimaginable. Think about it.

i feel bad for both. For all we know the guy who got shot could have been delusional/sick.

@@spongebob8445 - exactly. He thought that the homeowner owed him money. The homeowner had no idea what he was talking about. That screams "mental issues"… but some people just see the issue right in front of them. NEVER… the problems that led up to it.

In Canada, you cannot use a gun to defend yourself and family. How screwed up is that?

@@p4our587 as a hypothetical think of how many "mentally ill" criminals/ murderers/ school shooters/ or whatever there are. Even if someone is mentally ill you cant take anything as a grain of salt. He still shouldve shot him no matter what. So in a school shooter case they shouldnt shoot a man cause hes mentally ill? Even if hes had problems before? He was most likely just saying that he owed him money to get him to open the door

Prosecutors are demons

He was inside though. Stay inside.

@@Polowashere And wait for him to break the door or go in through the window? So that the intruder can take cover inside the house, so that they can then have a shootout inside? Sure bro. The old guy did the right thing.

@@Polowashere F the Police!

It's pathetic that defending yourself in any circumstance would get you prosecuted. Screw the law when it doesn't do shit for their citizens.

It has to stop!

Bro is the freaking protocol. Do you expect the cops to just trust the guy and make no further investigations?

Y r u sorry?

Im sorry for whoever fucks with Mrs.jackson now lmao

Sorry miss jackson

@@travispowell7835 I’m sorry mrs Jackson oooh!

Sorry because no one would want to be put in a position where they have to take another person's life... at least normal people.

He needs to visit the White House and be President for a day!

Their has to be an investigation when the officers got there they had no idea what was going on. They have to take statements and gather evidence. Can’t take a persons word especially if no other witnesses.

In some states, he could be charged because he actually went outside and confronted the guy. I don't know what the laws are where he lives, but that would be one thing possibly against him.

@@Txbasketball680 you can’t arrest someone because you have no idea whats going on. He called the cops, said whats going on and he is the home owner. From that info, they have no grounds to treat him as a criminal until they have reason to treat him as a criminal. They didn’t.

@@Sora_Digital In California, that kid's face would already be on t-shirts with his family saying what a good boy he was.

lol l pop pop

Kill one. Save a thousand

🤷🏿‍♂️

Are you pro life tho? Jesus wouldn’t do that😂

@@andrecarlo7692 ... Obviously you haven't read the bible.

Nobody is questioning it though

@@d_all_in unfortunately that's unlikely nowadays, anything which can be used to further suppress gun rights will be used to it's full extent

Because they want to know what led up to someone being killed, its not unreasonable.

@@spiritanimal7516 they know what led to the guy getting killed. They have it on video.

@@d_all_in the news staff is speculating that there could be charges.

I trust his arrest and questioning was a formality, with the police simply doing their duty . Really , it was as it should be .

@@victoriapayne7239 YUP! i've been thru a similar circumstance and the cops do not want to arrest someone who was defending their own life and their loved one's life. it's just part of the process. Hopefully he made it out without being in trouble for this. seems like a really nice dude that just did what was necessary in the circumstance.

It's just a standard procedure

not where I live

@@ItsOkayToEatPlaydo So where you live people go around shooting people and then they just claim self defence and the police let you go no questions ask?

It's not so clear cut since the homeowner went outside to confront the intruder. That makes him an aggressor so he could be charged. If he stayed in the house, he would have been fine.

@@nobodyspecial4702 in the old days you could shoot anyone on your property not just in your house that needs to come back.

@@nobodyspecial4702 the guy broke the window, homeowner could've been going to flee fearing the guy was coming in then saw the guys gun. Either way, he saw the man was armed, makes it clear cut self defense. You're allowed to walk outside, and yes castle doctrine exists on your entire property not just inside the home and they stated there is castle doctrine there. Case closed.

Not in blue cities, where criminals are the "victims".

@Caitlyn A Not legally. He was defending when inside his house. Once he went outside to confront him, he stopped being the defender under the law. Both are considered to be aggressors, and since he shot and killed the "intruder" before he actually entered the house, that removes the castle doctrine defense. Both men were armed, but he was already in a safe place then decided to leave it and confront the guy he shot. He should have stayed in the house and retained all the legal protections that entailed. Going outside removed them all. He had no legal grounds to kill the man simply to protect his property, which is what he did. He wasn't in imminent danger until he put himself in it.

Umm, he obviously tried to reason with him? When? Were you there? That’s weird for you to say that without witnessing more than I have in this video.

take a close look at the start of the ring vid, thug already had his gun out, yelling (somewhat muted ring volume, likely profanity) --if the homeowner had confronted him before he went and got his gun, he'd've been dead meat.

​@@KitchenerLeslie2 0:36 the guy's clearly conversing with an unambiguously armed man; there's nothing to do _but_ reason with him in such a circumstance. at least double check the video before questioning somebody's integrity.

@@em1osmurf yes!!

@@KitchenerLeslie2 What is wrong with you. One nice thing is he has a camera at his house. They will bring it in the court of law and I think I'm gonna get one.

Ye hed be in the right if he just started blasting

Well, God bless everyone

No you didn’t

Why the cap

Why you gotta lie if you ain’t pulling bitches from it?

that's because it's so in the face , we talk about the right of self defense but rarely do we see it so dramatically executed....that it shocks us ...rarely do we as citizens have to kill intruders for not leaving armed or not , because most of us are white unarmed friends with everyone....live in clean suburban neighborhoods...nobody would ever break in and harm our family or threaten our livelihood....until it happens

they can't say that charges wouldn't be brought because there could be new information. only the survivor's side of the story is told.

Only if you aren't black.

Thank democrat gun policy for this!

@@nycexposed Thank them for what exactly? This has always been the way self defense works, and it's the way it should work. The DA reviews all the evidence, then makes a determination about charges. It's called due process, calm the hell down cupcake.

Lol true exactly but hes a bad liar an idiot Your neighbor was knocking your door Old arguments between neighbors not a rober

Police have an investigation to do so of course they're going to ask a homeowner who killed someone questions. There's nothing wrongful about them taking him in for questioning.

​@@ratherb_skating7145 the police are not going to be your friend in that situation. Tell the police that you're going to fully cooperate but you need your lawyer first.

@RatherB_Skating What kind of bootlicking nonsense was THAT!!!!!!???????? 😂😂😂😂😂😂 🖕🤦‍♂️

The police are under pressure to persecute gun-owners, no matter the circumstances. Liberal politicians and DA’s are radical, 2A-hating socialists that will do anything to disarm the population.

And more and more break in and robberies are happening. Crime has gone up way high and keep going up. All they have to do is bust one of your windows unlock it and climb in

Any situation? How in the world can you possibly know that?

@@terminat1 a reasonable assumption considering he was willing to help in an extreme situation such as this

@@anonymoususer638 but he helped himself lol

@@FUTA_KINTE self-benefit doesn't nullify all benevolence

I mean its not sickening anyone can kill someone and say they defending themselves. It should be looked in to the lease.

@@devonsymonette5130 they cant tho ?

Yea, but if the democrats get their way, your Fd. Violating the 2nd amendment.

@@devonsymonette5130 ummmm No the fuck you cannot just kill anybody and claim it’s self-defense if you don’t have a reasonable fear for your life you’re not allowed to do anything and if you cannot prove that there was a legitimate threat that couldnt handled with any other form than deadly force you run the risk of getting locked up whether or not you really did fear for your life I mean Kyle rittenhouse is a perfect example if you don’t think the man in this video is 🤷‍♂️

USCCA provides insurance roughly 30 bucks a month, they're others out there. This is who I use. Well worth it. You have to protect yourself financially and physically these days

Shouldnt be oweing nobody money

@@sosacastro5772 ......

@@chuexiong3862 if he didn't owe that person money he wouldn't be in that predicament

​@@sosacastro5772 well now he is debt free. God love AMERICA

@@sosacastro5772 🤡

I agree. The cops are as bad as the criminals sometimes

the police did the right thing in a situation where *they did not have all the facts.* all they knew was that someone had been murdered who was allegedly trying to break into the property. they can't just take someone at their word without properly investigating what happened.

Wasn't a stranger it was a intruder

Kill or be killed, you decide!

​@@markmileymouth5651 He was both a stranger and an intruder

@@thomasdatdankengine5658 nah, you escalated from being a stranger to an intruder. You can identify the individual, they aren’t a stranger anymore. They’re either a friend or an intruder. This happens to be the latter.

Be prepped ahead. No remorse for justified actions.

We need more good guys with guns.

I agree it is good he feels bad but there was feasible opportunity for no loss of life.

We need accountability and good guys with handgun, and hidden cameras everywhere

I'd like to have him as a neighbor. Cool and collected, ready to make the right decision. ALL neighborhoods would be safer if neighbors would all be organized to stop these kind of things from happening. Much respect to the man for protecting his house.

He doesn't have to feel bad, but yes.

Wonder what the rap sheet says?

Yes in this situation he learned his lesson once, no do over!

Exactly, this is how we keep criminals off the streets

😂😂😂👍👍

@chrn byrn thats the joke

that's due process smh

@@ajuiceboxxx that’s a lot of bull shit, shouldn’t be done to someone defending themselves.

​@@miketheknife2it's not bullshit at all. At that point, all the cops know is that the guy shot someone dead. They don't know whether it was justified or not. They have to arrest him pending an investigation. If the evidence shows he acted reasonably in self defence, then he's released without charge. The guy himself understood that and he complain about the police.

It's Detroit... There should not be any charges for a man defending himself in or near his own home but you never know with these liberal elected officials in big cities.

Some states there are. Detroit is very extremist liberal & ppl spend time in jail/probation/get gun taken away for lawful defense.

@@TheFlyingZulu He's an older guy that seems honest and sincere not to mention he's black - part of why Fox is post this here. lol. If everyone would get honest (including Trump supporters) then the whole world would be much better. Trudeau/Biden/vaccine supporters too. Both of sides suck for their dishonesty and B.S.

If it was a city in Florida, no doubt about it. Michigan like Commiefornia, does not like its law abiding citizens having guns. Hopefully this law abiding gun owner doesn’t face any charges.

yeah, and give him a metal for valor while you’re at it!

He had the patience of Job, I would have shot him for banging on the door and not leaving,eff em!!!!!!!!

I agree, but the homeowner went outside his house with a gun to confront the intruder, meaning it probably won't be considered self-defense since Detroit is run by liberals.

Actually there are numerous scenarios in which someone can go onto your property without you having the right to kill them. Let's be precise

@@mith2946 you know what they meant.

Fuck the property. Once that gun comes out, you better use it before I do period. Idc if the gun is legal or not… self defense is self defense. Rather you than Me mindset kicks in.

In canada you'd go to jail for murder for doing the exact same thing.

he seems like an amazing neighbor

@@chriskl2361 in my country as long as you don't wake anybody up during the killing or have a suppressor or something and then there's no witness, you're good, just throw the body out. No forensics or anything is done in this country they'd probably say he's been jumped and hurt in the process.

in canada those softies let a guy free for decapitating this guy for after a wimpy 5 year sentence, canadians r soft as jello

@@chriskl2361 that’s crazy bro.

Yeah, but they need to make sure. It takes time to review everything. He'll likely be let off with no issue.

@Nick Taylor Many Demonicrat district attorneys will prosecute clearly defensive situations to make it appear they are fighting crime especially close to re-election time. Kim Gardner versus the McCloskeys in St. Louis just a few years ago, for example.

​@@Dinjur Hopefully. The DA's are kind of trash there.

So they should not investigate a killing? What a silly comment.

Cmon if you’re a criminal in “certain states “ , you’re never charged but if you’re law abiding … good luck

It doesn't matter you should use different tools like a taser versus a firearm. Shooting people is not the damn answer. It's so hick. And distasteful. No compassion whatsoever it's what's wrong with America....

4 shots center mass. Looks like the training took.

@@Caseytify holy shit man did get angry

A perfect example of the old adage "when seconds count the police are minutes away".

You know you are in America, when people are saying it is right to purchase a firearm and train to kill people with it. Blows my mind.

Yep. idk if he got a lawyer during the "interview" aka interrogation with the police. Regardless of how innocent you think you are, there are so many other variables at play (e.g. incompetent or corrupt detectives for starters) that can totally destroy you and put you behind bars for a long time. Dont risk it, always seek the professional services of having a lawyer present during questioning...especially for something very serious as this.

It truly is sad. All it takes is for the judge to say he escalated the situation by leaving his home. It shouldn’t matter, but with the way castle law works I wouldn’t be surprised.

@@Gizziiusa Inner cities are run by corrupt, agenda driven democrats, and the police follow suit!

@@TheShahofIrann yep. according to liberals, if a person is in mortal danger, they need to find their home "safe space", like a closet and wait there until police arrive. personally, i'd never own a firearm and live in a blue state.

Facts it sucks owning a gun in a democratic state they will look at you as a criminal for defending your home and the culprit gets a slap on the wrist , not this time

He should be proud, he put another predator thug down for an eternal dirt nap. If this happened more often, then predators would be less bold to attack people.

@@bon7029 agreed but killing another human is still difficult afterwards. It can tear at a man no matter how bad the pos was.

@@Mr.Mister001 Had a guy and a couple of thug friends try to kick my back door in once. The moment the managed to get through the door, one of them ate a bullet from my rifle. His thug friends abandoned him to die. One of his friends also made the mistake of trying to cover their escape by firing bullets at my home. He also got shot. I didn't sleep for a couple of days, but once the adrenaline wore off and the crash passed, I slept like a baby because I did the community a favor.

@@bon7029 do you not feel any remorse? They had wicked intentions but that’s no excuse

@@idkshtt sociopath ig

Handled perfectly.. Also: The View Joy Behar "if black people owned guns laws would change' haha. Here is why we have the 2nd amendment! BLACK legal gun owner. I am glad he is OK

i agree but your profile pic makes your statement hold less ground

They’re not gonna charge him

@@sgt7512 What does race have anything to do with this weirdo

@@sgt7512 __

Bullshit. Lol that's the ones who r the most dangerous man. He could ha e set this whole thing up. We have no idea. Everyone is upset that they are even investigating this event. Lol but yes they need to investigate and make sure he is telling the truth. Otherwise ot is murder. If that were ur son laying dead or brother or dad u wouldnt want them to just take this man's word for what happened. And I'm sure neither do they.

@@jesssecrest3719 reversing what was happening on the video. Someone was knocking nonstop yapping on your house with a gun, do nothing and let the aggressive man do. Tell me if you defend yourself for your safety and privacy or let him shoot you first and be killed after begging for being an idiot. Kill or be killed.

@@jesssecrest3719 no… dude has a gun fucking yelling and and screaming outside my house at my door. I’d give a few chances for him to leave like this guy did. And if he breaks my window yeah I’d blow several holes through the door and drop his ass. Idgaf who’s son or dad or wtf the kid was. You play stupid games you win stupid prizes

@@jesssecrest3719 you don’t come to nobody house play stupid games get stupid prizes

I am glad he got himself trained on how to use the fire arm and put four into the intruders chest.

No, he absolutely should not be worried. But a few instances have shown us that self defense is sometimes a crime in the US.

The constitution doesn't give someone a right to self defense, it protects the right that is unileanable

Police have to do an investigation though…

@@joedirt6073 you must not be an American! Cause here in Orlando I can shoot and kill trespassers who has vile intentions and don’t comply to leave! Of course you will have to prove the intruder was there unlawfully! But we got cams everywhere so it is really easy!

He didn't seem that worried

Definitely not my state 😏 Florida

Well on the very very small chance he actually knew the man, and owed him money and it unlocks and investigation of some drug trade or smuggling etc etc.. like said, small chance but the police are doing their job right.

Keep voting for the people they tell you to and wonder why.

When you shoot someone in self defense you have to expect there will be some process to follow, and it's reassuring that it's a serious process. If I have to shoot someone in self defense, I'll be ready to get the cuffs put on me; if I get charged I'll get an attorney, and so on and so forth. Hopefully I'll be able to change my underwear and grab a toothbrush before they haul me off. These are also the responsibilities of protecting yourself with a weapon.

No. U cant. The cops will watch u get killed, before they actually come and stop the crime from happening.

100 percent right if your a law bidding citizen your the criminal and the criminal is the victim in the liberal democrats view its total bs now a days. This man was totally in the right and nothing should happen to him 1 less criminal in the world now

Truth.

Yep

He likely won’t be charged with anything.

Well buddy... imagine living in a country where if you catch a criminal in the act, either the police or yourself and if the criminal didn't steal anything valued more than $1000 he goes free, or if he gets injured during his robbery to your place you're held responsible for his medic care, and yeah, as stupid as it sounds that's a day in the life of someone who lives in Panama City, Panama. Where criminals and hookers have more rights and better lifestyle than the working tax paying class. Something is definitely wrong with the world.

The law wants to quite literally create victim scenarios for average citizens... Fuck that and fuck the law then. Break into my house..? I *am* the law... And I'm aiming high.

"The courts" will never ... ugh I'm not even going to waste my time with such an ignorant comment.

@@CobraJayOfficial I mean it'd be cool

@@9E90S how tf is it ignorant when a Florida woman got time behind bars for firing off a warning shot when intruders came into her home? Courts have and will rule against defending oneself

It’s his property, if the guy doesn’t want to get the **** off, you have every right to blast him. There’s a reason we don’t like communists over here.

that may not be the city's viewpoint--remember, it's detroit, and your congressman will never see this video

💯

Exactly whats the point in legal firearms if your not allowed to defend yourself when someone breaks into your house with bad intentions

American thinking love it 😂😂😂

@@peacewarrior9500 you’re a fool.

Dang! It's up to 60k now??? Shit, I remember when it was 40.

He won't be charged. They just report it that way because it is indeed a possibility. He is however open to being sued in civil court by the victims family. Regardless if it was a justified shooting or not. That's why I carry conceal carry insurance

@@ryanirving3388 You are 100% INCORRECT. If the County Prosecutor deems it a Self-defensive shooting, the case does not go to Court and he CAN NOT be sued by ANYONE. He has "Civil-Immunity" under the Castle Doctrine Law.

@@scottyp4299 Lol no...stand your ground and castle doctrines give you immunity from criminal prosecution. Not civil liability. Anyone can sue anybody in civil court for any reason.

@@ryanirving3388 You are incorrect. Michigan Law states: 600.2922b Use of deadly force or other than deadly force by individual in self-defense; immunity from civil liability. Sec. 2922b. An individual who uses deadly force or force other than deadly force in self-defense or in defense of another individual in compliance with section 2 of the self-defense act is immune from civil liability for damages caused to either of the following by the use of that deadly force or force other than deadly force: (a) The individual against whom the use of deadly force or force other than deadly force is authorized. (b) Any individual claiming damages arising out of injury to or the death of the individual described in subdivision (a), based upon his or her relationship to that individual. History: Add. 2006, Act 314, Eff. Oct. 1, 2006 Please refrain from spreading mis-information.

Facts

I feel this man went to the wrong house