Thanks for that, good of you to let me know! Good luck!

Delighted to help! Good luck in the exam

@@drfegg288 this came up and this video definitely helped me, appreciate it :)

@@usn8964 If I was able to help in any way I'm delighted. Hope the rest of the exam went well.

As long as you can show that you know about it - and that it has been repealed - that would be sufficient in virtually any instance. But like the EU, it is still on the spec and so technically still in play. Thanks for the question and good luck!

@@drfegg288 Thank you! Yeah I was also wondering about the EU. Seems that it’s worth revising but less than other topics, my teachers said it’s unlikely that it comes up on the exam but still possible

@@tbradmart Yes. Annoyingly it might still come up - blinking unfair but there you go. My video just about covers it and if you tackle it from the structural/rational/cultural method you should be able to work through it. Good luck again!

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qa6bgM2cvLfHdoE.html

@@drfegg288 Perfect, thank you!

Hi and thanks for the interest. There are various examples of asymmetrical federalism out there (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmetric_federalism#:~:text=Asymmetric%20federalism%20or%20asymmetrical%20federalism,have%20the%20same%20constitutional%20status.) so it would not be unprecedented. I imagine, however, that the intent would be to avoid a heavily lopsided system and so presumably there would be a move to break England up into smaller parts. But who knows? Again, thanks!

@@drfegg288 yes, I think that would make sense as you would have to break England to around 10 regions in order to prevent a top heavy system whereby of the constituent parts has the vast majority of the population I.e. circa 80%