♥️

You are a great liar. There are 37 different arabic qurans and still counting.

@@harrytulasi5349 @ FACT: VERSIONS OF THE QUR'AN? Section 1 of 4: It has become a standard method of deception by Christian missionaries like Jochen Katz to superficially project issues that have been exhaustively addressed by both Muslims and Orientialsts, as we will see soon, insha'Allah. These missionaries are well aware of the difference between a transmission and a text (to be discussed in detail below). Yet, they intentionally replace one with the other in order to give the false impression to lay readers that the Qur'an exists in different texts. Thus, in order to address the questions of Hafs and Warsh, we will first offer a short introduction to the key concepts involved herein and then proceed to the heart of the matter, insha'Allah. However, before we begin this article, we would like to sincerely thank brother Moustafa Mounir Elqabbany from Canada and brother Muhammad Ghoniem from France, for providing valuable references. May Allah reward them profusely for their kind help. The contents of this document are divided as follows: • Revelation Of The Qur'an In Seven Ahrûf • Difference Between Ahrûf and Qirâ'ât • Conditions For The Validity Of Different Qirâ'ât • The Chain Of Narration Of Different Qirâ'ât • Hafs & Warsh Qirâ'ât: Are They Different Versions Of The Qur'an? • Recitation Of The Qur'an In Hafs, Warsh & Other Qirâ'a t • Printed Edition Of The Qur'an In Various Qirâ'a t • Books On Mutawâtir Readings REVELATION OF THE QUR’AN IN SEVEN AHRUF It is a well-known fact that there are seven different ahrûf in which the Qur'an was revealed. In the Islamic tradition, this basis can be traced back to a number of hadîths concerning the revelation of the Qur'an in seven ahrûf (singular harf). Some of the examples of these hadîths are as follows: From Abû Hurairah: The Messenger of God(P) said: "The Qur'an was sent down in seven ahruf. Disputation concerning the Qur'an is unbelief" - he said this three times - "and you should put into practice what you know of it, and leave what you do not know of it to someone who does."[1] From Abû Hurairah: The Messenger of God(P) said: "An All-knowing, Wise, Forgiving, Merciful sent down the Qur'an in seven ahruf."[2] From Abdullâh Ibn Mas’ud: The Messenger of God(P) said: "The Qur'an was sent down in seven ahruf. Each of these ahruf has an outward aspect (zahr) and an inward aspect (batn); each of the ahruf has a border, and each border has a lookout."[3] The meaning of this hadîth is explained as: As for the Prophet's(P) words concerning the Qur'an, each of the ahruf has a border, it means that each of the seven aspects has a border which God has marked off and which no one may overstep. And as for his words Each of the ahruf has an outward aspect (zahr) and an inward aspect (batn), its outward aspect is the ostensive meaning of the recitation, and its inward aspect is its interpretation, which is concealed. And by his words each border ...... has a lookout he means that for each of the borders which God marked off in the Qur'an - of the lawful and unlawful, and its other legal injunctions - there is a measure of God's reward and punishment which surveys it in the Hereafter, and inspects it ...... at the Resurrection ......[4] And in another hadîth cAbdullâh Ibn Mascud said: The Messenger of God(P) said: "The first Book came down from one gate according to one harf, but the Qur'an came down from seven gates according to seven ahruf: prohibiting and commanding, lawful and unlawful, clear and ambiguous, and parables. So, allow what it makes lawful, proscribe what it makes unlawful, do what it commands you to do, forbid what it prohibits, be warned by its parables, act on it clear passages, trust in its ambiguous passages." And they said: "We believe in it; it is all from our Lord."[5] And Abû Qilaba narrated: It has reached me that the Prophet(P) said: "The Qur'an was sent down according to seven ahruf: command and prohibition, encouragement of good and discouragement of evil, dialectic, narrative, and parable."[6] These above hadîths serve as evidence that the Qur'an was revealed in seven ahruf. The defination of the term ahruf has been the subject of much scholarly discussion and is included in the general works of the Qur'an. The forms matched the dialects of following seven tribes: Quraysh, Hudhayl, Thaqîf, Hawâzin, Kinânah, Tamîm and Yemen. The revelation of the Qur'an in seven different ahruf made its recitation and memorization much easier for the various tribes. At the same time the Qur'an challenged them to produce a surah like it (www.islamic-awareness.org/quran/miracle/ijaz) in their own dialect so that they would not complain about the incomprehensibility. For example, the phrase 'alayhim (on them) was read by some 'alayhumoo and the word siraat (path, bridge) was read as ziraat and mu'min (believer) as moomin.[7] DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AHRUF & QIRA’AT It is important to realize the difference between ahruf and Qirâ'ât. Before going into that it is interesting to know why the seven ahruf were brought down to one during Uthmân's (R) time. The Qur'an continued to be read according to the seven ahruf until midway through Caliph 'Uthman's rule when some confusion arose in the outlying provinces concerning the Qur'an's recitation. Some Arab tribes had began to boast about the superiority of their ahruf and a rivalry began to develop. At the same time, some new Muslims also began mixing the various forms of recitation out of ignorance. Caliph 'Uthman decided to make official copies of the Qur'an according to the dialect of the Quraysh and send them along with the Qur'anic reciters to the major centres of Islam. This decision was approved by Sahaabah and all unofficial copies of the Qur'an were destroyed. Following the distribution of the official copies, all the other ahruf were dropped and the Qur'an began to be read in only one harf. Thus, the Qur'an which is available through out the world today is written and recited only according to the harf of Quraysh.[8] Now a few words on Qirâ'ât: A Qirâ'ât is for the most part a method of pronunciation used in the recitations of the Qur'an. These methods are different from the seven forms or modes (ahruf) in which the Qur'an was revealed. The seven modes were reduced to one, that of the Quraysh, during the era of Caliph 'Uthman, and all of the methods of recitation are based on this mode. The various methods have all been traced back to the Prophet(P) through a number of Sahaabah who were most noted for their Qur'anic recitations. That is, these Sahaabah recited the Qur'an to the Prophet(P) or in his presence and received his approval. Among them were the following: Ubayy Ibn K'ab, 'Alee Ibn Abi Taalib, Zayd Ibn Thaabit, 'Abdullah Ibn Mas'ud, Abu ad-Dardaa and Abu Musaa al-Ash'aree. Many of the other Sahaabah learned from these masters. For example, Ibn 'Abbaas, the master commentator of the Qur'an among the Sahaabah, learned from both Ubayy and Zayd.[9] The transmission of the Qur'an is a mutawâtir transmission, that is, there are a large number of narrators on each level of the chain. Dr. Bilaal Philips gives a brief account of the history of recitation in his book: Among the next generation of Muslims referred to as Taabe'oon, there arose many scholars who learned the various methods of recitation from the Sahaabah and taught them to others. Centres of Qur'anic recitation developed in al-Madeenah, Makkah, Kufa, Basrah and Syria, leading to the evolution of Qur'anic recitation into an independent science. By mid-eighth century CE, there existed a large number of outstanding scholars all of whom were considered specialists in the field of recitation. Most of their methods of recitations were authenticated by chains of reliable narrators ending with the Prophet(P). Those methods which were supported by a large number of reliable narrators on each level of their chain were called Mutawaatir and were considered to be the most accurate. Those methods in which the number of narrators were few or only one on any level of the chain were refered to as shaadhdh. Some of the scholars of the following period began the practice of designating a set number of individual scholars from the pervious period as being the most noteworthy and accurate. By the middle of the tenth century, the number seven became popular since it coincided with the number of dialects in which the Qur'an was revealed.[10] To be continued to Section 2 of 4

@@harrytulasi5349 @ FACT: VERSIONS OF THE QUR'AN? Section 2 of 4: The author went on to say: The first to limit the number of authentic reciters to seven was the Iraqi scholar, Abu Bakr Ibn Mujâhid (d. 936CE), and those who wrote the books on Qirâ'ah after him followed suit. This limitation is not an accurate reprensentation of the classical scholars of Qur'anic recitation. There were many others who were as good as the seven and the number who were greater than them.[11] Concerning the seven sets of readings, Montgomery Watt and Richard Bell observe: The seven sets of readings accepted by Ibn-Mujâhid represent the systems prevailing in different districts. There was one each from Medina, Mecca, Damascus and Basra, and three from Kufa. For each set of readings (Qirâ'a), there were two slightly different version (sing. Riwaya). The whole may be set out in tabular form:[12] District.....|.....Reader.....|.....First Rawi.....|.....Second Rawi............................................................... Medina.....|.....Nafîc.......|.....Warsh.......... |.....Qâlûn.......................................................................... Mecca...... |.....Ibn Kathîr|.....al-Bazzî........ |.....Qunbul....................................................................... Damascus.|.....Ibn Amir..|.....Hisham.........|.....Ibn Dhakwân.............................................................. Basra........|.....Abu Amr..|.....ad-Dûrî..........|.....al-Sûsî........................................................................ Kûfa..........|.....Asim........|.....Hafs.............|.....Shcuba...................................................................... Kûfa..........|.....Hamza.....|.....Khalaf..........|.....Khallad...................................................................... Kûfa..........|.....al-Kisâ'i.....|.....ad-Dûrî.........|.....Abul-Harîth............................................................... Other schools of Qirâ'ât are of: • Abû Jacfar Yazîd Ibn Qacqâc of Madinah (130/747) • Yacqûb Ibn Ishâq al-Hadramî of Basrah (205/820) • Khalaf Ibn Hishâm of Baghdad (229/848) • Hasan al-Basrî of Basrah (110/728) • Ibn Muhaisin of Makkah (123/740) • Yahyâ al-Yazîdî of Basrah (202/817) CONDITIONS FOR THE VALIDITY OF DIFFERENT QIRA'AT Conditions were formulated by the scholars of the Qur'anic recitation to facilitate critical analysis of the above mentioned recitations. For any given recitation to be accepted as authentic (Sahih), it had to fulfill three conditions and if any of the conditions were missing such a recitation was classified as Shâdhdh (unusual). The first condition was that the recitation have an authentic chain of narration in which the chain of narrators was continuous, the narrators were all known to be righteous and they were all knwon to possess good memories. It was also required that the recitation be conveyed by a large number of narrators on each level of the chain of narration below the level of Sahaabah (the condition of Tawaatur). Narrations which had authentic chains but lacked the condition of Tawaatur were accepted as explanations (Tafseer) of the Sahaabah but were not considered as methods of reciting the Qur'an. As for the narrations which did not even have an authentic chain of narration, they were classified as Baatil (false) and rejected totally. The seond condition was that the variations in recitations match known Arabic grammatical constructions. Unusual constructions could be verified by their existence in passages of pre-Islamic prose or poetry. The third condition required the recitation to coincide with the script of one of the copies of the Qur'an distributed during the era of Caliph Uthmân. Hence differences which result from dot placement (i.e., ta'lamoon and ya'lamoon) are considered acceptable provided the other conditions are met. A recitation of a construction for which no evidence could be found would be classified Shaadhdh. This classification did not mean that all aspects of the recitation was considered Shaadhdh. it only meant that the unverified constructions were considered Shaadhdh.[13] THE CHAIN OF NARRATION OF DIFFERENT QIRA'AT In this section, the chain of narration or isnad of each Qirâ'ât will be presented. It is worth noting that the chains of narration here are mutawâtir. Qirâ'a from Madinah: The reading of Madinah known as the reading of Nâfic Ibn Abî Nacîm (more precisely Abû cAbd ar-Rahmân Nâfic Ibn cAbd ar-Rahmân). Nâfic died in the year 169 H. He reported from Yazîd Ibn al-Qacqâc and cAbd ar-Rahmân Ibn Hurmuz al-'Araj and Muslim Ibn Jundub al-Hudhalî and Yazîd Ibn Român and Shaybah Ibn Nisâ'. All of them reported from Abû Hurayrah and Ibn cAbbâs and cAbdallâh Ibn 'Ayyâsh Ibn Abî Rabî'ah al-Makhzûmî and the last three reported from Ubayy Ibn Kacb from the Prophet(P).[14] From Nâfic, two major readings came to us : Warsh and Qâlûn. Qirâ'a from Makkah: The reading of Ibn Kathîr (cAbdullâh Ibn Kathîr ad-Dârî): Ibn Kathîr died in the year 120 H. He reported from cAbdillâh Ibn Assa'ib al-Makhzûmî who reported from Ubayy Ibn Kacb (The companion of the Prophet(P)). Ibn Kathîr has also reported from Mujâhid Ibn Jabr who reported from his teacher Ibn cAbbâs who reported from Ubayy Ibn Kacb and Zayd Ibn Thâbit and both reported from the Prophet(P).[15] Qirâ'a from Damascus: From ash-Shâm (Damascus), the reading is called after cAbdullâh Ibn cAamir. He died in 118 H. He reported from Abû ad-Dardâ' and al-Mughîrah Ibn Abî Shihâb al-Makhzûmî from Uthmân.[16] Qirâ'a from Basrah: The reading of Abû cAmr from Basrah: (According to al-Sab'ah, the book of Ibn Mujâhid page 79, Abû cAmr is called Zayyan Abû cAmr Ibn al-cAlâ'. He was born in Makkah in the year 68 and grew up at Kûfah.) He died at 154 H. He reported from Mujâhid and Sacîd Ibn Jubayr and 'Ikrimah Ibn Khâlid al-Makhzûmî and 'Atâ' Ibn Abî Rabâh and Muhammad Ibn cAbd ar-Rahmân Ibn al-Muhaysin and Humayd Ibn Qays al-cA'raj and all are from Makkah. He also reported from Yazîd Ibn al-Qacqâc and Yazîd Ibn Rumân and Shaybah Ibn Nisâ' and all are from Madinah. He also reported from al-'Assan and Yahyâ Ibn Yacmur and others from Basrah. All these people took from the companions of the Prophet(P).[17] From him came two readings called as-Sûsi and ad-Dûrî. Qirâ'a from Basrah: From Basrah, the reading known as Yacqûb Ibn Ishâq al-Hadramî the companion of Shucbah (again). He reported from Abû cAmr and others.[18] Qirâ'a from Kûfah:The reading of Aasim Ibn Abî an-Najûd (cAasim Ibn Bahdalah Ibn Abî an-Najûd): He died in the year 127 or 128 H. He reported from Abû Abd ar-Rahmân as-Solammî and Zirr Ibn Hubaysh. Abû Abd ar-Rahmân reported from cUthmân and cAlî Ibn Abî Tâlib and 'Ubayy (Ibn Kacb) and Zayd (Ibn Thâbit). And Zirr reported from Ibn Mascud.[19] Two readings were repoted from cAasim: The famous one is Hafs, the other one is Shucbah. Qirâ'a from Kûfah: The reading of Hamzah Ibn Habîb (from Kûfah as well) Hamzah was born in the year 80 H and died in the year 156 H. He reported from Muhammad Ibn Abd ar-Rahmân Ibn Abî Laylâ (who reads the reading of Alî Ibn Abî Tâlib (RA), according to the book of Ibn Mujâhid called al-Sabcah - The Seven - page 74) and Humrân Ibn A'yan and Abî Ishâq as-Sabî'y and Mansur Ibn al-Mu'tamir and al-Mughîrah Ibn Miqsam and Ja'far Ibn Muhammad Ibn Alî Ibn Abî Tâlib from the Prophet(P).[20] Qirâ'a from Kûfah: The reading of al-'Amash from Kûfah as well: He reported from Yahyâ Ibn Waththâb from 'Alqamah and al-'Aswad and 'Ubayd Ibn Nadlah al-Khuzâ'y and Abû cAbd ar-Rahmân as-Sulamî and Zirr ibn Hubaysh and all reported from Ibn Mascud.[21] Qirâ'a from Kûfah: The reading of cAli Ibn Hamzah al-Kisâ'i known as al-Kisâ'i from Kûfah. He died in the year 189 H. He reported from Hamzah (the previous one) and cIesâ Ibn cUmar and Muhammad Ibn cAbd ar-Rahmân Ibn Abî Laylâ and others.[22] To be continued to Section 3 of 4

@@harrytulasi5349 @ FACT: VERSIONS OF THE QUR'AN? Section 3 of 4: Now our discussion will be on Hafs and Warsh Qirâ'ât. HAFS & WARSH QIRA’AT: ARE THEY DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF THE QUR’AN? The Christian missionary Jochen Katz had claimed that Hafs and Warsh Qirâ'ât are different 'versions' of the Qur'an. A concise and interesting article that the missionary had used to reach such a conclusion can be found in the book Approaches of The History of Interpretation of The Qur'an. Ironically, it contained an article by Adrian Brockett, titled "The Value of Hafs And Warsh Transmissions For The Textual History Of The Qur'an", which sheds some light on various aspects of differences between the two recitations. It is also worth noting that, in contrast to Mr. Katz, Brockett used the word transmission rather than text for these two modes of recitations. Some highlights from the article are reproduced below. Brockett states: In cases where there are no variations within each transmission itself, certain differences between the two transmissions, at least in the copies consulted, occur consistently throughout. None of them has any effect in the meaning.[23] The author demarcates the transmissions of Hafs and Warsh into differences of vocal form and the differences of graphic form. According Brockett: Such a division is clearly made from a written standpoint, and on its own is unbalanced. It would be a mistake to infer from it, for instance, that because "hamza" was at first mostly outside the graphic form, it was therefore at first also outside oral form. The division is therefore mainly just for ease of classification and reference.[24] Regarding the graphic form of this transmission, he further states: On the graphic side, the correspondences between the two transmissions are overwhelmingly more numerous than differences, often even with oddities like ayna ma and aynama being consistently preserved in both transmissions, and la'nat allahi spelt both with ta tawila and ta marbuta in the same places in both transmissions as well, not one of the graphic differences caused the Muslims any doubts about the faultlessly faithful transmission of the Qur'an.[25] And on the vocal side of the transmission the author's opinion is: On the vocal side, correspondences between the two transmissions again far and away outnumber the differences between them, even with the fine points such as long vowels before hamzat at-qat having a madda. Also, not one of the differences substantially affects the meaning beyond its own context... All this point to a remarkably unitary transmission in both its graphic form and its oral form.[26] He also discusses the Muslims' and orientalists' attitude towards the graphic transmission: Many orientalists who see the Qur'an as only a written document might think that in the graphic differences can be found significant clues about the early history of the Qur'an text - if cUthmân issued a definitive written text, how can such graphic differences be explained, they might ask. For Muslims, who see the Qur'an as an oral as well as a written text, however, these differences are simply readings, certainly important, but no more so than readings involving, for instances, fine differences in assimilation or in vigour of pronouncing the hamza.[27] Brockett goes so far as to provide examples with which the interested reader can carry out an extended analysis. Thus, he states: The definitive limit of permissible graphic variation was, firstly, consonantal disturbance that was not too major, then unalterability in meaning, and finally reliable authority. In the section titled, "The Extent To Which The Differences Affect The Sense", the author repeats the same point: The simple fact is that none of the differences, whether vocal or graphic, between the transmission of Hafs and the transmission of Warsh has any great effect on the meaning. Many are the differences which do not change the meaning at all, and the rest are differences with an effect on the meaning in the immediate context of the text itself, but without any significant wider influence on Muslim thought.[28] The above is supported by the following: Such then is the limit of the variation between these two transmissions of the Qur'an, a limit well within the boundaries of substantial exegetical effect. This means that the readings found in these transmissions are most likely not of exegetical origin, or at least did not arise out of crucial exegetigal dispute. They are therefore of the utmost value for the textual history of the Qur'an.[29] And interestingly enough the author went on to say: The limits of their variation clearly establish that they are a single text.[30] Furthermore, we read: Thus, if the Qur'an had been transmitted only orally for the first century, sizeable variations between texts such as are seen in the hadîth and pre-Islamic poetry would be found, and if it had been transmitted only in writing, sizeable variations such as in the different transmissions of the original document of the constitution of Medina would be found. But neither is the case with the Qur'an. There must have been a parallel written transmission limiting variation in the oral transmission to the graphic form, side by side with a parallel oral transmission preserving the written transmission from corruption.[31] The investigation led to another conviction: The transmission of the Qur'an after the death of Muhammad was essentially static, rather than organic. There was a single text, and nothing significant, not even allegedly abrogated material, could be taken out nor could anything be put in.[32] Finally, we would like to establish Adrian Brockett's conclusion on this matter: There can be no denying that some of the formal characteristics of the Qur'an point to the oral side and others to the written side, but neither was as a whole, primary. There is therefore no need to make different categories for vocal and graphic differences between transmissions. Muslims have not. The letter is not a dead skeleton to be refleshed, but is a manifestation of the spirit alive from beginning. The transmission of the Qur'an has always been oral, just as it has been written.[33] Therefore, it comes as no surprise that Christian missionaries like Jochen Katz find themselves "refleshing" a dead skeleton in order to comply with their missionary program of outright deception. Of course, regular participants in the newsgroups have time and again witnessed Jochen's tiring displays of dialectical acrobatics - the misquoting of references and the juggling of facts. Surprisingly enough, missionary Katz cannot even support his point of view using the reference [23], which undermines his missionary agenda of twisting the facts. The reference [23] has firmly established that: • There is only one Qur'an, • The differences in recitation are divinely revealed, not invented by humans • The indisputable conclusion that the Qur'an was not tampered with. RECITATION OF THE QUR’AN IN HAFS, WARSH & OTHER QIRA’AT A few centuries ago, the Qurra, or reciters of the Qur'an, used to take pride in reciting all seven Qirâ'ât. In light of this fact, we decided to make an informal inquiry into some the Qurra who recite in different Qirâ'ât. Two brothers confirmed the following: Date: 18 Sep 1997 13:44:37 -0700 From: Moustafa Mounir Elqabbany Newsgroups: soc.religion.islam I (the author) can confirm that al-Husarî did in fact record the entire Qur'an in Warsh, as I have the recording in my possession. A Somali brother also indicated to me that he has a copy of the Qur'an recited in Al-Doori ('an Abî cAmr) recited, again, by al-Husarî. The Qur'an is very widely read and recorded in Qawloon in Libya and Tunisia, so it shouldn't be difficult to acquire those Qirâ'ât either. And another brother corroborated the following in a private e-mail: Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:59:24 +0100 From: Mohamed Ghoniem To: Metallica Subject: Re: readings Well, before al-Husary, Abdel Bassit Abdus Samad has recorded the entire Qur'an in Warsh and many cassettes and CDs are on sale everywhere in the Egypt and in France as well. I personally have in Cairo many recordings of other readers such as Sayyed Mutawally and Sayyed Sa'eed exclusively in Warsh. I have seen several cassettes in the reading of Hamzah (from Khalaf's way) on sale in Egypt and I have bought a couple of them during this summer. They were recorded by Sheikh 'Antar Mosallam. Presently, I have got two CDs recorded by Sheikh Abdel Bassit gathering three readings (Hafs, Warsh and Hamzah). These CDs belong to a series of six CDs on sale publicly in France in the fnac stores. To be continued to Section 4 of 4

Exactly 🙂

Did you care to find out why he lost his speech for nine years before he died?

@@albertyakubu3477 stroke.So many people got strokes so many people get sick and DIED so what’s the problem?He is a human being just like Jesus.Human get sick and died.If that’s determined your faith,congrats to dig your grave to hell.Pastor can’t answer his question and your answer is because of his strokes?Lol

@@FlyGuy8601 Just like my JESUS CHRIST? or your annabi isah salam? whatever, just like Islam call him. deedat like isah? This is the breed of people deedat has gullibly used religion to convince thru religion cliches and intellectualism, i.e he is also exalted to the level of God incarnated in Jesus? an height of apostasy and profanity. Lucifer was an exalted angelic being but he chose to exalt himself to the level of God and God brought him down. My question to deedat's fans and you is this, could it be that deedat was brought under earth when he exalted himself by criticizing the Bible? I know all people die at some points but is deedat's(An expert on Comparison Religion) death compared to that of Jesus? of cause he also said Islam believes His death and resurrection and his coming back. I believe an orator of allah like him rather died, without a miracle, too early minus nine years lost of speech, considering his impact to the Islamic world. Concerning pastors not answering deedat's question does not proof his points right. The idea is the SPIRIT of GOD that gives understanding you can be a baby christian and God's Spirit gives you sharper discernment than the Theologians, the Bible said, out of the mouth of babies and suckling I have ordained praise.....that they may silence the mouth of deedat, lol 😂🤣😂(Psalm 8:2, paraphrased). The man without the SPIRIT does not understand the things of God because they are spiritually discerned therefore the Bible was written not to you, deedat or muslims but to Christian because only them have the seal of God's Spirit. Please, repent and be born again you receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. SHALOM.

@@albertyakubu3477 Deedat spoke well that no christien till date born enough to answer his question.....if u compare his disease just like bro "Zairul86" said thats just the crappy mentality of people. Well As a human yup "JESUS PBUH IS HUMAN" or was he alien according to ur BIBLES!? yes as a human being "Deedat well not just deedat everyhuman is like jesus" oops i can say it like this too (Jesus is a human too....like me)......if he(jesus) falls and his knees gets hurt then he can feel the the pain just like all humans do. its "nabi isa alayhis salatthu wassalam" or "isa ibn mariyam". i dont understand the "exalted,apostasy&profanity" point can u plz explain it simply(im not that much good in english yet im trying my level best to answer you)!? "SATAN EXALT HIMSELF TO THE LEVEL OF GOD" thats what bible says!? i heard he was cursed by god bcuz of his shitty pride,ego&racism. Before humans creation Azazil aka lucifer is the only creation which understood most who&what god is(higher level conciouness) and he praised and worshipped god more than anyone......according to islam he was cursed bcuz he disobeyed the command of god with pride,ego&racism which he shown towards first human adam pbuh. According to islam(in hadith) "Before thrown into earth satan said(dared) to god i promise in ur might and power to lead humankind to ashtray". with this hadith we understand "He knows that the god is the exalted one and high but the creation of mankind he cant accept it but never in one place he calls himself "im greater than god".......i wont say he is a good guy but he clearly knows who is he and who is god is. "Im greater than ur new creation which is humans and u create him with clay&water and u created me with smokless fire....so im superior". and he(satan) will say at the day of judgement:- And Satan will say ˹to his followers˺ after the judgment has been passed, “Indeed, Allah has made you a true promise. I too made you a promise, but I failed you. I did not have any authority over you. I only called you, and you responded to me. So do not blame me; blame yourselves. I cannot save you, nor can you save me. Indeed, I denounce your previous association of me with Allah ˹in loyalty˺. Surely the wrongdoers will suffer a painful punishment.”..quran 14:22. No one knows what is "exalted" means except the soul of the humanbeing(before soul breathed into the human body every soul knows who allah is)......i dont think criticizing the "condradiction&corruption is a bad thing" do u!? Mr.deedat ever criticized the god!? did he criticize mary!? did he criticize jesus teachings!? he only criticize authors who put their hands on bible and add&removed whatever they want and quran says to those kind of authors:- So woe to those who write the "scripture" with their own hands, then say, "This is from Allah ," in order to exchange it for a small price. Woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for what they earn....quran 2:79. we dont know how jesus pbuh will die...so we cant say it clearly. every human beings death is different....yup i agree. Islam says "Jesus never died nor crucified,he was raised by allah the most gracious the most mercifull" why did u say something which he(deedat)dont said. deedat said "we believe jesus ascended to heaven and we believe in his second coming and we believe his as a messiah". where did mr.deedat said "islam believes jesus death&resurrection" can u show the proof!? "orator of allah like him died without miracle too early minus nine years lost of speech.....,,,blah blah blah" what r u blabbering mate!?say it clearly. when someone asks a question u must answer.....deedat dont ask question to brainless christien he asked question to a "PASTOR" mate......the one who teaches bible to everyone and he dont answer his question means "1.pastor not educated enough" or "2.know the answer but dont want to accept it"......ofcourse its a proof mate. bcuz the who deedat aasked question is not some normal christien he asked question to "PASTOR". And finally just like every christiens u pulled ur MYSTRY CARD which is "U DONT HAVE HOLY SPIRIT&JESUS IS DIVINE IS MYSTRY&U NEED TO BORN AGAIN" mate tell those crappy excuses to ur chrsitien sect brother.....Bcuz we dont have versions in quran but u have versions in bible.....again u will say "Holy spirit this and that" which "holy spirit is talking truth in bible" protestant holyspirit or catholic holy spirit or orthodox holy spirit or trinitarians holy spirit or unitarians holy spirit or johovahwitnessess holy spirit......,,, so which one!?.....dont tell us those kind of lame excuses. psalm 8:2 well u can say the pastor satanly name😂😂😂✌👍. How can u twist ur bibles word by saying deedat!? Are u misusing ur bible to mock others!? well u should say that to jews then u can hear their beautiful answer. "God strengthed(supported) prophets&messengers with holyspirit aka gabriel or gibreel AS".......not normal humans bcuz u follow what ur prophet or messenger teaches. so u dont need the support of holyspirit to understand something......bcuz ur prophet or messenger already understanded that something with the support of holy spirit and teached U but ur mistake is "u corrupted it,contradict it,add&removed verses for ur own benefts aka not preserved it well or u dont have the way to preserve it correctly". one more question mate "u said us to born again so god will bless us with holy spirit" "SO ARE U ASKING US TO DIE AND BORN AGAIN OR ARE U ASKING US TO CONVERT TO CHRISTIANITY!?" WA ALAIKUM SALAM.

call protestants,catholics,trinitarians,unitarians,orthodox,jehovahswitness.....,,,,all christiendom sects around the world and ask them simple question "WHAT IS THE BASIC BELIEF AKA FOUNDATION OF CHRISTIANITY"!? +Publish their answers in world wide media.....those fools will fight&blame one another for dont having "HOLY SPIRIT" and ask one another to be "BORN AGAIN".....such a hypocrites😂😂😂✌ Before going to talk about love,care,mercy,justice.....,,,,first talk what is ur "FOUNDATION" and prove us ur foundation is "STRONG". For ex:-if u ask any muslims around the world "WHAT IS ISLAM!?" those who have knowledge will answer "La ilaha illallah;muhammeder rasulullah" (TO WORHTY TO WORSHIP ALLAH IS ONE;MOHAMMED IS THE SERVANT&FINAL MESSENGER OF ALLAH). simple right. If christianity is not a religion of COFUSION then give us the straight answer. Is father fully god!? if the answer is yes then u have one who is worthy to worship.

Yeah P52 is a fragment that contains some lines from the Gospel of John, and it's the oldest manuscript of the NT that has reached us. It's dated from somewhere around 70 C.E. to 100+ C.E.. I believe it contains around 140 letters or so, and what's most noticeable is that there's two words missing that are found in later manuscripts of the same text. This is quite significant, because there's already a change in the text from the oldest known extant fragment of the Gospel of John. Two words (missing) out of a 140 letters text isn't a small detail either. Percentage wise, it's a huge difference. As for full manuscripts of the Bible, I'm not sure if you're correct. I know that the Books of Kings from the Tanakh in their completed form are known from manuscripts that come centuries after Islam. Imagine that. Here's the Old Testament, and the oldest extant manuscripts that contain the complete Books of Kings as we know it today are several hundred years younger than Islam. You'll find this again and again, by the way. Whenever sceptics and critics claim that the Qur'an was copying texts from Jewish sources, more often than not, you'll find that those sources are younger than Islam, meaning that if we're going by chronology and extant manuscripts, it's more likely that those sources were copying the Qur'an, and not the other way around. For example, a Christian might tell you that the Quranic story of the crows/ravens scratching the soil to show one brother how to bury the body of the other brother, was taken from Jewish folklore. When you trace it to its source, it turns out that the Jewish version was written long after the time of Muhammad(saw), and is merely attributed to a pre-Islamic source. The evidence, however; meaning in the form of extant manuscripts, shows that the Jewish version comes much later than the Quranic story, making it more likely that the Jews copied the story from the Qur'an. So be aware of that whenever Christians use plagiarism as an argument.

Don't call her sister.....she knows wht she is and u don't know what she is ... a Golddiger

@@aliabdi450 brother we are muslim We do not say such kind of things .show your kind so she see who are muslims really are one who never insult other.ones who never hit others by hand and tongue...bro❤️❤️

There are 37 variant qurans, so it is not perfectly preserved. Farid and Yasir Qadhi acknowledge this. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o9uXZcWgz9-1omw.html

Mr. Covid, I assume you are an intelectual, could you give one hint of example please?

@@ThereIsNoGodbutMohammad study or research about it Arabic brother then talk it's not a variant it's different type or style of writing of the same word same meaning also Quran was written in leather or paper which was scarce and expensive in Arab peninsula at that time they had to remove the content off scrub it then write Quran over it Again read about the tribes of that time 95% of them were literate so they were an oral civilization who can memorize pages and pages of poetry as an example and did narrated it to the masses so I believe Quran has preserved orally and by writing also today we have millions who memorize the whole Quran from cover to cover by (اسناد)meaning chain of narration to the prophet himself

@@ThereIsNoGodbutMohammad search different Qur'anic recitation styles same word same meaning different phonics different pronunciation (dialect ) is the nearest word to describe my meaning

@@ThereIsNoGodbutMohammad FULL OF IGNORENCE 💯💯💥

Bro she don't care about Islam or Christianity....she came here thinking she would make money by posting the Great Ahmed dedat

@@aliabdi450 your comment could be a fitnah. we are not in her shoes.

yea you right

There are 37 different versions of the quran. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o9uXZcWgz9-1omw.html

​@@ThereIsNoGodbutMohammad Let's compare versions of The Bible and Qira'at of Qu'ran 1- Versions of Bible have differences in verses, I mean you can find a verse in version 1 and you can't find it in version 2. 2- Qira'at don't have this, all verses are in all Qira'at even if the number is different but it still exist. 3- Versions of Bible have big difference with each other and touch meaning of the text 4- Qira'at as the name tell, it's just ways of reading Quran, it differs in how we pronounce words more than changing words themselves! 5- a Version of The Bible don't recognize other versions of The Bible as they are true (from God) 6- All Qira'at are came from 7 Ahrof (Dialects) of Quran which we have memorizers and manuscripts of them so each one is from Allah because The Quran revealed in 7 Ahrof as The Prophet (saw) so all of them are true!

@@ThereIsNoGodbutMohammad And stop liking your comments

@@ThereIsNoGodbutMohammad there is numerous translations, and 7 reading styles but not different versions. See link for more on this topic. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p6t7drdjr7K6iXk.html

@@save_sudan_and_palestine I'm not like you - I don't need to like my own comments.

Quran 4:11 "Allah instructs you concerning your children: for the male, what is equal to the share of TWO females." Qur'an 4:34-Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and SCOURGE them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High, Exalted, Great. Sahih al-Bukhari 2658-The Prophet said: "Isn't the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?" The women said: "Yes." He said: "This is because of the DEFICIENCY of her mind". Sahih al-Bukhari 3241- The Prophet said, "I looked at Paradise and found poor people forming the majority of its inhabitants; and I looked at Hell and saw that the majority of its inhabitants were women."

@@ThereIsNoGodbutMohammad Twisting Allah's words and the hadiths is deficiency in you not in the Holy Book and teachings of the prophet peace be upon him.

@@ThereIsNoGodbutMohammad there is a vers in the Quran for people like you. Chp18: vrs56 We do not send the messengers except as deliverers of good news and warners. But the disbelievers argue in falsehood, ˹hoping˺ to discredit the truth with it, and make a mockery of My revelations and warnings.

@@kabobz How can anyone twist allah's words, because Allah is the best deceiver, and no one can compete with him (Quran 3:54). Arabic: ومكروا ومكر الله والله خير الماكرين English: And they cheated/deceived and God cheated/deceived, and God (is) the best (of) the cheaters/deceivers.

@@ThereIsNoGodbutMohammad @ FACT: QUR’AN? HADITH? OTHERS? Shifting from one topic/issue to another as the last and final resort after failing severely and miserably to prove any against the truth of the so-called 'ISLAM' (Allah, Qur’an, prophet Muhammad (pbuh), etc., and any single thing that matters or relates to), the only real true religion on earth? • QUR'AN? How? By 'cherry-picking' any single verse of the Qur'an by chance by taking the actual meaning of the cherry-picked verse out of its original context (by twisting, lying, slandering, etc.) as a pretext by means of mocking, degrading, maligning, etc. the real truth of ISLAM, Qur'an, prophet Muhammad, etc? or, By 'cherry-picking' any single verse of the Qur'an 'partially' (and not as a whole 'verses' instead) by chance by taking the actual meaning of the cherry-picked verse out of its original context as a pretext by means of mocking, degrading, maligning, etc. the real truth of ISLAM, Qur'an, prophet Muhammad, etc? • HADITH? How? By 'cherry-picking' any single out of all those 'weak' and 'false' hadiths (sayings/narrations) by chance by taking and using it (the cherry-picked statement) as a tool (as a pretext) by means of mocking, degrading, maligning, etc. the real truth of ISLAM, Qur'an, prophet Muhammad, etc? or, By 'cherry-picking' any single 'statement' of the hadith 'partially' (and not as a whole 'statement' instead) by chance by taking the actual meaning of the cherry-picked statement out of its original context as a pretext by means of mocking, degrading, maligning, etc. the real truth of ISLAM, Qur'an, prophet Muhammad, etc? OTHERS? How? By doing it intentionally, in which, it's all due to none other than the ‘hatred’ and 'jealousy' by lying, slandering, twisting, etc. by means of degrading, maligning, ruining, etc. the real truth of ISLAM? Or, By blindly believing by browsing through all those fully-biased non-Muslim haters and liars' websites and channels intentionally for (obtaining) false, fabricated interpolated information, biographies, made-up stories, tales, myths, etc. as a tool (as a pretext) by means of mocking, degrading, maligning, ruining, etc. the real truth of ISLAM? or, By dumbly listening and merely believing to any single non-Muslim’s liar, slanderer, hater, etc. and hearsay? Here! See below: @ Fact: The Qur'an and hadith: Qur'an, the one true word of Allah (The Creator), Lord of the worlds, is one single thing. While hadiths, all the words of the Creator's creations (humans) is another single thing. Both, are just 2 different things/matters. Absolutely fact! Allah (The Al-Mighty) Says: • "Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur'an and indeed, We will be its guardian." [Noble Qur'an, Surah Al-Hijr 15:9] Note: The Qur’an is perfectly preserved. While on the other occasion; Instead of all those 'authentic' ones, there are tens of hundreds of thousands of 'weak' and 'false' hadiths (sayings/narrations) in here and out there scattering around all over the place across the globe. That's fact! Here: For example, Anis Shorrosh, a well-known Arab missionary, says: ‘... Bukhari, collected twenty thousand of them, of which he rejected ten thousand, accounting them untrue. •Of the remaining ten thousand he accepted only 7,275, declaring the rest to be untrustworthy•. Abu Da'ud accepted authentic only 4,800 rules out of 50,000.[1] Similarly we find Norman Geisler and Abdul Saleeb claiming that: '...Bukhari, considered to be the most reliable collector, admitted that of the 300,000 hadith he collected, he considered only 100,000 might be true. He then narrowed this number down to 7,275, many of which are repetitions so that the total number is in fact near 3,000. •That means that even he admitted there were errors in over 295,000 of them•![2]' And, 'As to the abundance of the apocryphal traditions, we learn that the famous authority al-Bukhari choose only 7,000 out of a host of 600,000 traditions that were current in his time.[4]' *NOTE: 'Fact-proof and evidence' is all it takes. That’s what ‘truth’ is all about actually!

Translation is not the problem, 37 different versions is the problem kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l7-nqrtm0cnDp6s.html

@@ThereIsNoGodbutMohammad You are the problem! You know that All Qira'at which recognized by Muslims are from Allah and We know that from The Prophet Muhammad (saw) not from your liars

@@save_sudan_and_palestine Allah never spoke directly to mohammad - so where did mohammad get the quran from?

World 🌍 wide church and preacher are exploring it for money and other things

Thats why i had to say this to rukia. You have to watch the whole debate then you know. This short clip does not the whole picture. Ahmed try to make christian understand, the Bibles he stated in that clip too much curroptions. We muslim honestly believe the bible. We muslim must believe bible is the words of God but nowadays bibles not. And the others 2 books only for the humans on that periods but quran (the forth) is for all humanity nowadays. Thats the only point he want all humans nowadays to understand. Btw thanks to react to him... May Allah open your heart to believe in Him more.... 😃😃😃😃

Thank u for this video. I want to tell something my friend. I m native arabic. I v read quran o lot of times warch hafs kaloon ibn kathir. All this qiraat. It s the same quran same words but some few differents prononciations. That all. And i challenge u give just one word that exist in one qiraa that doesnt exist in others qiraat. Hope u look for the truth and dont accept what those liars say in this video.

@Saiyan Prince!! but Muslim says they have only one Quran.. till today no one is proving which one is that

What are you trying to say?