The security guy from Hinckley A was really polite and helpful. A credit to his profession and employer.

Great interaction credit to the police for there proffessional response and interaction :)

What a change lovely friendly interaction well done the 2 officers interesting to see these places friendly people all round

This was a fantastic learning opportunity for the on-site police in particular, and hopefully they took full advantage. We all have our jobs to do, so these kind of discussions are so important to make it safe for everyone!

They still thought it was illegal to fly the drone in the zone which is worrying, are they being misled? It is either legal or not legal, it is not hazy!

If onLy the police responded so quickly to real crime.

How much kit has he got on his vest? He must struggle to fit in that car 😊

Support you 100% mate, love what you do but the old saying goes 'time and place' and 'live to fight another battle'. When the security guard was going out of his way to be polite and highlight the point about restrictions and the police say the same and also say we are not going to do anything about it, I think best to just say thanks and draw the zipper across the mouth. It's a nuclear site at the end of the day not a police station or migrant hotel. I do a lot of photography myself but also being a 15 year Army veteran who worked a lot to protect vital assets etc, I wouldn't film the site at all out of principle given how critical it is.

Friendly couple of officers, not overbearing willing to listen.

Hell man, fairly decent coppers!

AIRSPACE : Restricted Area EGR153 HINKLEY POINT. Section 239 ANO gives the Secretary of State the power to restrict flying in areas deemed not safe in the public interest, for example..... (a)the intended gathering or movement of a large number of persons; (b)the intended holding of an aircraft race or contest or of a flying display; or (c)national defence or any other reason affecting the public interest. The legislation and areas restricted are already in place which is why there are FRZs etc. There is also a list of all drone encounters flying over nuclear sites and this one will now be on that list as "pilot spoken to, words of advice given to pilot" You're lucky they didn't seize your drone and prosecute you using the GPS of where your drone had flown.

Good to know that the SIA guards protecting Nuclear sites are not our friends from the Hotels for once LOL

To be fair to the copper he was only 5% sneaky 👍

Re-uploaded without all the illegal flying footage, ace!

Excellent work by the Police and Security guard. Good on them.

Sounds like you have the regulation back to front.All nuclear facilities have a prohibited area with a lat and long point with a distance from that point and a height above ground level where no aircraft including unmanned aircraft can enter.There are exceptions for helicopters taking off or landing from and within the area with the permission of the owners or person incharge of the site ie they may have a VIP visitor.

Great information from the cop's in this one

Good Video and very informative. Just shows that not even the people protecting our critical infrastructure know the true law. Well done mate, one of the better videos.

The security guard was great 👍🏾

Can police please make sure they know what they’re talking about before they come spouting out rules. Sick of all the lying.

Well if nothing else, you were certainly given a detailed explanation that's for sure!

They were replacing a hydraulic hose on the barrier. G4S and Securitas are same company.

Im sorry to say, that your understanding of Drone assist is not quite correct. It uses data formed from notams info pushed by altitude angel. This flight is in an official restricted area: EGR153 HINKLEY POINT and therefore illegal. You mention central London and flights there, again this isn't correct, there is a helicopter zone over the top but there is also a drone-restricted zone (in fact 3) 157,258 and 159 below this. Please check before flying. Thanks

Nice informational video for viewers and the well informed police!

Whaaaat? G4S employed to do nuclear security???? We're DOOMED!

Nuclear sites don't mess with them even under construction, top security. Nice Police good lads.

LOL They had already checked out your car :D Priceless

I normally watch the main Auditors but came across your Channel. Impressive stuff! You just got another Subscriber. Impressive stuff! Well done you!

The tracks for crane. The circle are part of the crane tracks for turning

The young security guy what a difference! And one of our own for a change!! Very Professional son!👍

I actually used to work there on both a and b sites, this was before the days of drones. If there was an aircraft that ventured too close the site incident alarm would sound . They also did exercises where UK special forces would land in a Chinook in the field next to ' a' site which is now the new 'c station '

Poor security guy he is being so polite and your coming across as a arrogant child Mr i know it all .

What a great Audit with very amicable conversations

Wow nice informative copper that's rare

You’ve literally incriminated yourself with this video by admitting you got the drone up in a NFZ, it’s clearly marked as a NFZ on drone assist as A it’s a nuclear site and B it has a helipad, not the brightest button are you 🤦‍♂️

Nice informative cops decent guys security guy was a nice lad others take note cheers dje

I love “core value” and “robust “ bull corporate jargon.

The Restricted Zone is restricted ONLY to the activities permitted in the "Remarks". Therefore unless you are in a helicopter (with relevant permissions) flight is not permitted. Notes also say "Unless regulations in your region explicitly permit the operation of your drone in this area, we recommend you do not operate your drone here.". I cannot see how your flight could have been perceived as OK.

DJE Media.... Great informative video but where is the drone footage? Enjoyed the content though 👍👍👍👏👏👏

The policeman was rabbiting on about this drone rule and that drone rule. DJ already knows all of this. My point is, just because someone is flying a drone does not mean they know nothing about flying a drone! There seems to be no real justification or need for checking every aspect. It's like checking whether a car driver knows how a steering wheel works. If you insist, at least have some reasonable grounds for doing so.

Did you not check Drone Assist before flying here? I would’ve taken seeing that red zone as not allowed, It’s all a no fly zone. I’ve done Hinkley Point myself and I even referenced it in my video that you can’t fly a drone there

Amazing, interesting video

excellent police and security personell, spot on!

Entertaining material from DJE 😎

When I used to fly drones the pilot can use FPV, but you had to have an observer by your side

249g are restricted from flying over crowds, I would take that as being festivals, football crowds, crowds of 50 or more etc

Not bad for the police unlike most of them, good video

Did you not see the FRZ on Drone Assist? It's not just drones that are restricted. Civil aircraft have to be above 5000 feet.

I'm mum to my 3 dogs ... So yeah happy mother's day to me 💓 ah blissful quiet 💕

Well, all that explaining about flying the drone was as clear as mud, One copper was contradicting and waffling on while the other was just desperate to find out what car you were in so he could get your details even though you had refused.

Isnt Hinkley point being built and financed by our closest allies? France and China?

Dude, that is a massive no fly zone, oldbury and berkeley are decommissioned, but they are still no fly zones, posting this renders you liable to prosecution.

The Police forcing road users to cross a solid white line, very unprofessional....but then again they don't really care about laws.

People who are as nice as those guys, are perfectly fine telling your youtube name and whatnot. We're not that bothered. But yea, pleasant audit. Good job

Always insightful 👌 👍 🎮🛸see you on the next one!

How would you know form blue lining on the road that you were entering nuclear property with no signs don’t think they would have a leg to stand on there

Not every nuclear facility is 2NM, Burghfield is only 1NM under The Air Navigation (Restriction of Flying) (Nuclear Installations) Regulations 1988

You misread what I was trying to say I think Poppy, wasn't having a dig I was saying you be yourself x

Good long video upload again dje media let's see what the next one brings I don't mind if they go on for a while really nearly a hour long ok 👍

What was all the equipment that police officer waring and how can he carry out his duties

My friend be very careful at hinkly point the security carry guns ok.

POLICE TAKING THEIR PERCIEVED RESPONSIBILITY TO PUT THEIR NOSES INTO PEOPLE'S PASTIME. WHY CANT COPS LEAVE POLICEING OF DRONES TO THE CAA.

You have a good video's

if nuclear sights are made to be able to take a airliner crashing into them i dont think a drone will do much lol but all in all everyone was cool and had a good chat

It's not the one AB just covered in Didcot is it? Two security armed police got educated.

Were is the drone footage💥

The way they parked caused all traffic coming past to cross the double white lines. They seemed OK but they couldn't definitively state the law when pressed. Vague phraseology and ambiguous statements. What else do these plod do all day?

John Cena spotted masquerading as a British nuclear policeman!

The most frustrating video yet, when you kept saying it’s stupid to fly over they kept thinking you was agreeing that it’s illegal to fly over

Level headed bunch of people,makes a change😊

Police will be able to identify anyone with facial recognition technology

Are you going to post the drone footage?

What’s with the police now days with all the stuff on the vest and will it get in the way when driving

You are trying to catch them out 😂 you clearly know the law and playing dumb

Is the cop talking about certain sized drones or circumcised drones?

Why would it be irresponsible flying a drone over a nuclear site? There is no danger of a drone or anyone causing an explosion. If there is then maybe time to get rid of nuclear power plants. Mankind is curious, and especially when it's our government. So they will always want to view it.

Driver of the police vehicle psyching viewers out by rolling forward and back again.🤨

EGR153 HINKLEY POINT....? Does that not apply to you

How’s everyone’s day going

next time they ask the weight of your drone, tell them 0.000245 imperial tons :D or 8.78 ounce :D or something like that... you got it :D

🤣🤣👍👍👍👍

If the CAA allows it. The police and nuclear plants can cry all they want. What you're doing is legal. Nuclear plants if restricted by CAA, then no go. But if the police and the plant have their own policy. Then that's exactly what it is. A policy and your not breaking a law. So fly all you want as the cops are copsplaining for something that is not actually real.

OBVIOUSLY. !!!

I think the rule is stay well away and don’t put yourself in that position 🙄🤔😊😅

Top copper.

Not a clue , thick ! 👮

The line of sight rule is total dog 💩

Does anyone know why that police car hasn't got the red asterix on display even though it has police with guns using it?

EDF Electricity de France, still getting electric from our French brothers and sisters..

The officer is talking nonsense on some of the drone rules.

Meanwhile the 'pro' drone police are crashing and losing drones left right and centre...

Stop talking it's their job to investigate uphold your rights remain silent for the love of will you ever learn.😮

1000nth like

How much shit has he got hanging off him?

You seriously need to do your homework on drone/rules/laws mate. You're going to be one of these youtubers that rise then have a massive fall. This area is restricted area and your flight were completely illegal in fact,most of your flights are illegal to be honest whether its VLOS restricted zones or flying to low (yes I said flying too low) private property in deed do own the immediate airspace in their boundary (usually to the height of their building) I don't comment to be a prat for the sake of it but I want to make sure the rules are followed for two reasons 1) is so that you don't find your self in hot water 2) as a drone operator myself I don't want people ruining the hobby that I love. The more rules get broken then the more restrictions I will have imposed on me. The rules were a little more relaxed before this auditing craze but since then they added little extra restrictions like VLOS . VLOS were a numerical number, 500m to be precise but then they said you have to be able to see it and after that ,they added that you must see it and be able to know it's orientation

how about your name first copper?

🤔 i do'nt know what i'm talking about , but i can pretend that i do . 👮🤡

In UK law you can pretty much do whatever you want unless it is specifically forbidden. DJE you are likely correct that unless the instruction mentions drones, they are more than likely not prohibited.

11000volts. Not waych, Th A Team, then¿

Officers if it's legal by the CAA and it's a lightweight 249 gram drone and it's a legal flyzone what the hell are you doing there . You keep saying maybee iffy not sure they are not laws . I think they are using laws for drones over 249.(confused) DJ is breaking not one law but they are on a fishing expedition. Meaning they do not know the laws but try to pretend they know and look stupid by talking dribble.