Their 14-minute opening game was a sports moment masterpiece. 😂

The BBC commentators falling over themselves to say Alcarath (badly) drove me crazy 🤣🤣

All my appreciation to Nole for the gratious way he behaves when he looses, I'm a Carlitos' fellow and love the way he treates the boy, it takes a lot of nobility and love for what you do to be that cool in such defeats

With Novak's movement, I've been saying this from the start of the year. He's naturally been slower this year than last year and that's even before his knee injury. Speed is so important at the top level, and was why I didn't think he'd ever reach a GS final again unless he gets a lucky run or Alcaraz / Sinner are injured. He can't extend rallies effectively where he needs to retrieve the ball quickly, nor get into optimal positions when moving across the court. He'll do very well to make the last 4 of any GS for the next year and a half, and I think this match finally exposes the reality of the situation, and I expect he'll retire in 1.5 - 2.5 years time. He'll probably give next year a real go, but will recognise he can't compete at the level he wants to. But he even said it himself, he felt half a step off the pace - and against the top opponents where he needs it, he'll notice this now on a more regular basis.

It was such a bitter taste that he lost in the finals in straight sets but I am happy to hear him speak on the post-final press conference. He now knows what he is up against and has to work extra hard if he plans on winning another slam which I am sure motivates him.

The impressive thing about the win for me that I don't think was altered by Djokovic's knee was the serve and return matchup. I was extremely impressed by Alcaraz's serve and return. And that meant Djokovic couldn't effectively shorten points and still win like he could against everyone else he played.

I think too much is given into the match. This is similar to Australian Open 2019 when Nadal came off from a surgery in december and faced minnows till the final. He then faced Novak who was on a different level and was demolished. This time it was Djokovic who was on the receiving end of it.

I was surprised that Djokovic even reached the Final, with all these Youngsters like Alcaraz , Sinner etc. playing so well, and he has Not been at his Best all year. Shows his mental toughness and also his Experience. I thought it would have been Alcaraz and Sinner in the Final , but it had to be Djokovic to prove that Carlos could "DEFEND" his Title against one of the "Greatest" Tennis players who has won 24 Major Titles. So Kudos to Djokovic for reaching the Final after having Knee Surgery and also at 37 years old, and he was also chasing History. He did Not use the Surgery as an Excuse for his Defeat. He accepted it with "Grace, and Class," and Acknowledged that he was " Outplayed" by Alcaraz. CONGRATULATIONS to Carlos Alcaraz on Defending the Title 🏆🇪🇸 👏👍👍❤️ and to Novak for showing such Class in Defeat.👌👏👍

Gill, he didn’t loose to Sinner in straight sets

Nole is beast To compete at this level at 37 its just unbelievable His lifestyle will be studied for decades once he finishes his career Sure by his standards he played belllow average this match but he will be back stonger

Great show guys!:). Couple things: Hats off to Novak. Yes. But let’s be real here. And my boy Gill made it crystal clear when he did his preview/prediction show. Gill picked Nole to win the tourney. And I know exactly why. Were Gill and I the only two people who thought Novak could make a run after we saw the draw come out? Who did he have to face that was a dangerous grass courter? Honestly other than Popyrin, who has never gone far in a slam, but has a massive serve and seems like a throwback grass courter, which was great to see, there were no other threats in my mind. And I think in Gill’s mind as well. Hurkacz maybe, but I was never truly scared for Novak due to Hubie. The tigers 🐅 were on the other side of the draw. And only one 19:22 would make it through. Gill saw it clear outta the gate, and that’s why he had Novak going to the final, even with his knee compromised. Hats off to Gillian. And in Carlos and his teams mind, they felt pressure to win. They want to ascend, and get better. It would have been a step backwards for him to lose to Novak on Sunday. Partly because he was less than 100% healthy, and also because Carlos won last year, and should be a year better. So this was a very, very important win for Carlos and his team. Similar to Novak winning in 2015 vs Roger, after he won in 2014.

Before the match, the majority opinion was for Djokovic. Little mention of the knee. He'd had easy matchups, was fresh. But Carlos was dialled in. Consistent, creative and with tremendous speed and power. Djokovic was overwhelmed. The aura of invincibility for Djokovic is gone.

Thank you, Three for a great show! All kudos to Alcaraz, who played an amazing match. I wanted Novak to win and I'm not so much surprised that he lost, but the way he lost. I sensed the same luck of motivation and strength from him...kinda like a deja vu from AO this year. I hope he can win one more GS before retiring.

10:17 Djokovic lost to Sinner in four sets, not straights

Novak is still Novak of the past, except if he is facing Jannik or Carlos. In that SW19 finals if it was as just Medy or Zev he could've won that Slam. Alcaraz performance on that day improve a lot from serving mid 130s to prescision returning with power and very few unforced error. But I knew Carlos kept something extra motivation to beat Novak because if he just played moderately like the past few matches I don't think he would have beaten Novak. Besides he now knows how to beat Novak as he said in the press con prior to the match. Alcaraz was just phenomenal on that day, whoever in front of him can't even come closer to that performance. UNBELIEVABLE PERFORMANCE. HE HAS THAT X-FACTOR THAT OTHERS DON'T.

It's only a matter of time before Djokovic will not be able to beat Alcaraz any more. Alcaraz is 21 and already an all time great. Djokovic is 37. Do the math. That time may have already come, but this Wimbledon tournament was not the place to judge that. Djokovic had just miraculously made the Wimbledon final after a knee surgery when conventional wisdom says he shouldn't have even played in it.

This reminds me of the other GOAT Serena in her later years at slams. Couldn't quite get over the hump and win.

Followed the match on the radio in France. What came through loud and clear is that Alcaraz has incredible killer instinct - like Nadal at his peak - he knows when he needs to turn Godzilla. As a die hard Novak fan, I will be thrilled to see him win one more Slam, AO could be the most logical.

30:20 alcaRAZ in Spanish with the Z being pronounced like TH in THINK but Latinos would pronounce the Z as S. People from southern Spain would drop the consonant at the end of the word but that's because the accent/dialect we speak in the south. As English speakers I think it'd make more sense if you stressed the first syllable instead of the last one. That's my very personal opinion. I'm a Spaniard

I'm Spanish and I live in Madrid. No one says “Álcaras" in Spain. Literally no one. We all say "Alcaráz". Someone from Andalucía, depending on the province, might say pazo instead of paso (step), but It does not work the other way round.

Oh finally! We get the acknowledgement (thank you Joel) that Carlos, despite being Spanish and of course looks up to Rafa and wants to be like him (ie never say die mentality), that who he really wants to *play* like is Federer, his actual inspiration. Cam is saying what we can all see; Carlos is the better tennis player over Sinner. Just like Roger was ALWAYS the better tennis player- still is in fact ,has all Carlos' shots, and more and a vastly better serve than Carlitos and had the super fast, explosive movement too, so much so that it didnt look as fast cos he got there so smoothly, looked like he had time to spare. Luckily for Carlos, he is the younger player rather than the Novak-like Sinner, tho there isnt a 6yr age gap so it wont affect their rivalry to anything like the same degree , but still, he isthe younger of the two so has that advantage as well as being built like Rafa, whereas poor skinny Sinner had to grow his body first, still is in fact.

Last year Djokovic won 3 out of 4 Grand Slams, reached the finals of the other one. Won the ATP finals (the tournament where you don't have "good draws"). This year he started without his team, he certainly was not himself against Sinner in Australia or against Alcaraz in England. Novak is not going anywhere for now if the health allows him to play, he has more than 5 Slams in him yet. We suffer from recency bias, we see Murray and Nadal struggling and inmediatly want to put Novak in that bag, despite he has proven over and over he is just different. Props to Alcaraz, he will have a beautiful rivalry with Novak, Alcaraz is simply a genius, like a fusion of Novak and Federer, but with a much much better mindset.

This has to be the beginning of the end for Novak. He’s 37 and was outplayed in this final, the semi at AO v Sinner. Pushed to 2 back to back 5 setters in the first week at RG before suffering that knee injury. It was a miracle he made it back and got to the final 3 and half weeks after the operation. I suspect he will go the Serena route rather than Sampras end to his career chasing that elusive 25th slam. Roger, Rafa and Andy all retired or retiring this year.

It ispronounced Alcarath. The z in Spanish--Castillian anyway is pronounced th. If Carlos says that's how his name is pronounced then it is.

12:23 no… way more pressure on Alcaraz. Because (1) Alcaraz was favored going into that final and (2) Djokovic barely seems to be affected by pressure any more. He literally just plays at a high MENTAL level in every big match. He only loses to opponents with physical superiority.

I also was waiting for this . ☺️

Wow! What a great story from Amy. Can't wait to see those pictures of her and Bjorn.

With all due respect to Novak because it sure is impressive to make a final after surgery. But his draw was easy form the get go, all the top players where in the other side. He got a W.O. And Musseti in the semis lol. It was good but not inspirational imo.

This episode is a classic example of the big difference between getting ahead of a trend and analyzing a trend post hoc. Three can do the latter well, but certainly not the former, at least not regarding the only remaining competitive member of the name of the show. The fact is that the signs that this is a step-down year for Djokovic have been there for over six months, but were largely whitewashed by Three prior to the Wimbledon final, in service of breathless appreciation of the Old Master Djokovic. Let’s go through this thesis: First, the baseline for my assessment is the comment I posted on the pre-finals episode: “The Djokovic story thus far is his joke of a draw. Alcaraz has beaten players with a combined 14,201 ranking points, Djokovic just 9,530, and if you pull out the de Minaur walkover, 5,700 points. Alcaraz should win on Sunday--it would be the just result.” Second, in this podcast, to start, Joel sees the final turning out to be the first best test of Novak at Wimbledon, who had not played a top-20 opponent prior to the final. Where was the heavy focus on the difference in caliber of competition in the podcast PRIOR to the final? If a podcast goes on for 40 minutes and mentions that Djokovic has had some fortunate match-ups to get to the final, that is NOT the same thing as emphasizing his weak draw and its implications in its analysis. Third, mystifyingly, Amy says “I thought we nailed it.” Did she sleep through those podcasts prior to the final? Did she dream that the group consensus was that Alcaraz would rout Djokovic? Prior to the final, Amy was actually saying that, sure, you could say Djokovic had a bit of an easy path to the final, while NOW, now she’s obsessing about the difference in the speed of play between the caliber of opponents Alcaraz faced and those Djokovic faced. She didn’t say anything about the speed of play presented by the opposition prior to the final. Fourth, Gill says that in the final Djokovic just looked too slow, and is just not in a position where he can “offense my way to a win.” Of course not! Djokovic is NOT that player. He’s a spot-serving backboarder. He can come to the net more against weaker opponents like Rune and Musetti (how many majors have THEY won?), not against the elite tier (how many majors have Sinner and Alcaraz won?). Fifth, Amy returns to the gap between the top-5 and the rest of the field. But name me ONE TIME prior to the final when she mentioned the difference between RANKINGS of the players Djokovic faced vs the rankings of those Alcaraz faced. She certainly didn’t mention it as clearly as I did in my comment above. Six, Amy quotes Federer about not thinking about winning short points, and before the final, she said she was concerned about Alcaraz thinking about not wanting to play a lot of long points against Medvedev. What she missed is that what Alcaraz MEANT with his comment was that he wanted to take INITIATIVE in the points, even against a top-tier opponent. Taking initiative is the defining difference in Alcaraz’s game. The only type of initiative Djokovic takes against top-tier opponents is the direction of his groundstrokes (e.g., backhand down the line). Taking initiative against elite players with droppers or net rushing just is not a reliable part of Djokovic’s arsenal. (It isn’t part of Sinner’s arsenal, either). Seventh, prior to the final, Gill knocked people for holding onto the years-out-of-date view that Djokovic wants to extend points. But after the final, Gill now says that he was surprised that Djokovic didn’t try to go to lockdown mode more often to steady the ship against Alcaraz. The dirty little secret is that Djokovic, for all his improvement of his serve and volley, remains a player who has built his career around grinding defense and endurance, and if those aren’t good enough for him to beat the elite players, then he won’t beat them. Eighth, before the final, Gill emphasized how much Djokovic had turned his season around from the motivational concerns many bemoaned during the clay court swing, when many even said that Djokovic would not win another major. NOW, Gill praises Joel’s insight that outliers are starting to look like inliers. NOW, Gill says that Alcaraz and Sinner set the standard for winning majors and Djokovic has lost in straight sets to them both times. Hmm, recall that Zverev did better against Alcaraz at RG than Djokovic did against Alcaraz at Wimbledon, so who is best measuring up to the standard for winning a major going forward: Zverev, Medvedev or Djokovic? This question is now not as easy to answer as Three certainly would have told us prior to the Wimbledon final. Ninth, Amy revealingly admits, “I don’t watch much diminishment of skill.” Well, it’s going to be hard for her to spot it, then, won’t it? She’s been blind to it all year. Remember how much weight she put on the water bottle excuse? Tenth, Joel is dismissive of fans-as opposed to “media”-who don’t even want to count the Wimbledon final because of Djokovic’s knee. But the next time Joel is so dismissive, he might listen to the breathless tone of admiration of the efficiency and craftsmanship of Djokovic’s practice and play at Wimbledon, which he saw first hand this year. In the pre-final podcast, Joel sure sounded like a fanboy to me. Eleventh and finally, Gill notes with praise Djokovic’s masterful display of skills in his run to the final. But what Gill is missing is that Djokovic’s ELITE skills do NOT include those necessary for offensive play. His serve, volley and dropper are very good-good enough for the likes of Rune and Musetti-but they have never been the cornerstones of his 24 major victories. They certainly won’t be good enough to get any more major victories. Enough of my thesis. This episode also had some nice nuggets: * Joel made the good point about Alcaraz taking something off his passing shots, which can actually make them tougher volleys (because that puts more pressure on the volleyer’s technique to do something with the shot). * Three noted the interesting-and shocking-stat that the longest rally of the match was 13 shots. Wow-that might set a record for the shortest longest point of a major final! * Joel admitted that he needed to better understand the type of surgery Djokovic had. SO TRUE for me as well. The only thing I’ve learned is that Djokovic had his meniscus removed not repaired, which improved recovery time. But what does the meniscus do? Are there any consequences of removing it? Or is it like a tonsil or appendix? I just have no idea, and haven’t seen much about it in the tennis press (although I have not been that diligent in looking for it, I admit).

What nobody mentions is even Novak himself has said numerous times he has never played anyone like Carlos Alcaraz. He says Roger and Rafa each had their own specialty but Carlos is the most complete player aside from himself that he has ever played against and he happens to be a hell of a lot younger and he's playing with confidence.

As a Swede I really enjoyed this episode. Firstly, your pronunciation of "Båstad" was spot on Gil. Secondly, I cannot believe that Amy ran into Björn Borg twice, randomly! I've lived here for most of my life and I've NEVER run into him.😅 But I will be looking up those photos of you and him Amy 😉

As soon as we saw the Draw, i dont think anyone thought Novak wudnt reach the Final.

Alcaraz very strong and fast in all surfaces at 21 yo.

I find it really hard to listen to the excuses concerning the knee after hearing all the praises in the preview before the final.

Wonderful discussion. If Djokovic and Nadal can hang around for couple of years then they will be able to win 1-2 grand slams as Alcaraz and Sinner are not going to be fit and in form all the time. Thankfully Alcaraz, Sinner and Medvedev are filling the space created by Big3's exit.

Amy’s hair looks so good!!

You can't blame the knee surgery guys,as others have said of wasn't fit or ready he wouldn't have even entered the tournament,Djokovic recently said it himself,his level is not at sinners or alcaraz right now

Everyone makes excuses for Djokovic and Sinner when they don't measure up. Carlos is the real deal.❤❤❤

Thank you Gill for explaining the Alcaraz pronunciation being different within Spain. During Queens, Andrew Castle, the BBC commentator, said that he wasn't bothering with changing the pronunciation to how it's said on the ATP Website and got a load of stick from people.

"How could we have known there was a problem?" Really. His movement was suspect for the whole tournament. Some improvements as he moved through the rounds, yes, but still suspect. The issue is you can still knock out wins against those who don't know how to exploit your weaknesses but you'll get exposed against the right opponent. Grass comp not the best so no surprise he made the final with the draw he had (including QF w/o).

Like an older golfers past 50 whom would lose distance every year, joker’s at the tail end of his career and suffers from the same physics in performance or recovery. He is still the GOAT and don’t see him losing to any top players except 4 sinner and alcaraz in the next 1/2 years. Alcaraz’s serve is vastly improving and reached high 120 and mid-130s in Wimbledon. Once he dials up the accuracy, no one can catch him.

Amy's motherly version of the aging champion Novak is sweet; her sense of the game is a happy mix of head and heart. Gill is a seasoned force in our midst and gets better with every dawn. As for Joel, the effect of English crimson strawberries shows on his return sans the RP British accent. 😜❤🎾🎆 Novak deserves all the respect and appreciation in the world. Billions of blistering blue barnacles aka Carlitos that didn't quite allow the smooth sailing of the Titanic called Novak, but then it ain't Novak's fault in the slightest. The likes of Sinner, Meddy, Carlos are taking centrestage slowly but surely. 🎾🎾 Amy, Gill and Joel - Classy, intelligent, warm and here to stay! 🎉🥳

Borg Amy story 👌😂 fun 👍 as ever excellent show guys ❤️

Is this guy really a 7 time winner and that too on grass... Amy lundy please teach him how to volley . Pun intended

So you make excuses for why Djokovic lost his Wimbledon match due to his knee injury, but none for Nadal who has been off for a year due to injuries. Do you expect Nadal to be on top of his game after being off that long? I’m done with you all and your lack of fairness

I felt at the start of the year that this could be Alcaraz's take off year, similar to Federer in 04. My only concern was health. I can see Alcaraz and Sinner winning 75% of all majors for the next 4-5yrs. I hope Zverev can get over the line and win a major, as he could be the one guy that could be a thorn in their side. Rune is always the hope as well.

Has Alcaraz officially separated himself from the pack? Is he on a tier all his own -- above Sinner, Djokovic, and Medvedev -- or is it too early to say?

Djokovic had a bad serve day. Alcaraz had a very good serve day. Djokovic had bad timing on neutral balls, he failed at the net and Alcaraz beat him not because of the age difference, but because his technique was better.

I just find it funny how people concentrate on this final and use the knee excuse but forget the first 6 months of this season. What's the excuse for those ? Not one victory over a top ranked player and losses to low ranked players. Besides lots of games where he needed to use the Djokovic card to beat low ranked players instead of just dominating them. So, is it just a bad season or a sign of father time ? We will see. But what is clear is that he can't bully this next generation like he did with the previous one (Meddy, Zverev, Tsitsipas, etc) and i think that will be the definitive sign of his decline, starting to loose against that generation that he dominated. The new one ? Forget it. Especially in 5 sets.

The weak era of the last 5 years is over. No chance for Novak to win.

If Novak continues trying to equal Federer's 8th wimbo elusive record, he most probably will equal Nadal's 13 bagels instead. On record, Nadal has 13 bagels received, Novak 12 and Federer 5. He almost got it in the first set of his straight sets loss in wimbledon.

Alcaritos was playing @ such a high level, Novak did not have a chance - set 3 was competitive, but not enough to extend the match. Such a high level from Carlos & Nole playing very descent but nowhere near good enough to match it. Just an ole-fashioned beat-down. Kudos to Nole for knee surgery to Wimby final - just amazing! Thanx J-A-G. Luv U Guyz-Gal ❣Cheers, Milan🎾

I don’t think Novak will beat Carlitos at a slam ever again.

So good as always. Thanks Gil!

Did Cramps help Djokovic beat Alcaraz in RG 23?Will never know just like Ankle doing Zverev in during RG22.

How do you guys explain the fact that Musetti said this is the best Novak he has played despite having played the version of Novak that won 3 majors in a year and it would’ve 4 if he made fee easy backhands against Alcaraz ?

Djokovic not just wants to retire, I would say he should and has to, very soon.

Am bummed by Novak's loss and am interested in seeing how he goes on from here. If it happened to him at ten years younger, I'd say, "watch out--a monster will rise from this!" I'm not sure now, though, given his senior tennis age, but he's my favorite athlete ever, and I'll thank him for that and I'll love him 'til the last for what he's given to the most loyal of his fans everywhere. I loved it when gracious Carlos called the great one "still a superman." Just as Novak owed a lot to both Roger and Nadal before him, Alcaraz and Sinner and any of their eventual equals will have turned out to owe a lot to Novak.

Surprisingly beat in the final ???? Geezus wake up man - look at the draw he played - and pay attention to your first guest commentator!!!

al-ka-rÁz ending like ( th) in English -- last syllable stress. Like “Alcatraz”. No way like a lot say “ Ál-ka-raz”.

I got a feeling Ruud might win gold :)

Zero titles in 2024. Still holds true. How many trophies do you see Djokovic taking this year for the season to be satisfying for him?

Olympic's, USO , Paris Masters, ATP Finals for Novak to focus on

Djokovic was just lucky into final,he got easy draw & didn't play against 10 ten in this tournament.

If De Minaur was healthy he would have beaten Djokovic in the Quarters

Alcaraz is just too good. Good for his competitors that he isn’t focussed all the time!!

"I don't want to make excuse for this and that" - is a cute way to make excuse. 😊

The old dude with glasses was unbearable to listen throughout this. Novak literary had a surgery 40 days before that final. He didn't train properly. Alcaraz is a problem tho. Nothing against the dude. But let's not pretend that Novak's year was sadly derailed with bunch of random sh1t happening. Off course Alcaraz is a reason why Novak doesn't play his best, but at last two Wimbledon finals Novak 100% played below his current form. Neither 2023 nor 2024 against Alcaraz, Novak was not able to reach his "best" current level. I am not sure why. Maybe it is just because it is Wimbledon final and equaling Federer record... Just strange.

First here! Was waiting for this one

Novak took another part of Alcaraz' soul in Paris last Sunday Aug 4th ( added to the Cincinnati, ATP Finals matches ) he's not finished. _You must remember that Novak is 37 but that is not 37_ . He really is 33 /34 max.

They asked Amy to pose next to Borg because she's gorgeous... With all due respect.

The way Alcaraz bulldozed Djokovic I want to call it bulldoz match of the century.

Nole might as well face Carlos in as many as 4 other gs finals and concede them and that would be just as beautiful to witness

Djokovic has the most grand slam finals losses all time with 13. Next most is Fed and Lendl with 11. Highly unlikely Novak will win another slam, he’s already older than the oldest GS champion ever which was Ken Rosewell at 37 yrs 1 month.

Alcaraz played very well, but I've never seen Novak play so poorly in the first 2 sets. When does he go down a double break in the first 2 sets in a Major final? Probably never before this final. He also looked out of it mentally. Also, Novak net rushing and getting destroyed with passing shots. I think Novak had physical problems, or he's slowed down quite a bit.

Novak is done!

Djokovic was just a solid baseliner. He had no one to challenge him in that department over the last couple of years. Players he beat in the Wimbledon finals Berrettini and Kyrious has a one dimensional game. Federer unfortunately choke the 2019 final.

In Spain its AlcaraTH, in south america and south part of Spain they say it like you do. In Spain atleast where he is from is going to be AlcaraTH.

Carlos destroyed both Gill and Djokovic.😂

Anothee factor: Alcaraz is 2 years younger than sinner. By the way, every spaniard would say alcarath, or just alcarà, dropping the last sound, in southern spain. Alcaras more probably in sudamerica

Looks like Lundy was spot on. I thought Novak still had in him to pull off that Novak magic and wins slams he's not supposed to and combined with everyone else not showing great form. I guess Novak had a great shot to vulture this slam if Tiafoe upset Alcaraz and won that tb But reminder Alcaraz has yet to outperform Novak in a HC slam (when Novak competed ofc). USO could be a close contest, and I like Medvedev there a lot more than the other surfaces.

Gill - Novak made the final on a bum knee. Give him another 6 months. Yes, he had a lapse of motivation early this year, but he doesn’t need to be written off.

This was his last chance to win a Grand Slam, from now on will play like Murray never to win something big again, mark my words.

the Olympics are coming fast, wonder if Nole and Rafa are ready . I see a run from Nole maybe, but Rafa has not passes any real tests on clay as he likes the test to get the mojo going.

Age has caught up with Novak

you may fool Mother Nature some of the times, but you cannot fool Father Time at anytime... Djokovic, perhaps for the first time, did show his age in that final match-up... And no technology can fix that, at least not yet... It is strange that the three commentators do not mention at all that de Minaur, one who could have challenged Djokovic a bit on grass given his speed, withdrew from their quarterfinal match, thus giving Djokovic some breathing space and therefore his demolishing of Musetti in the next round...

Without a head coach, he is self coaching himself. I don't know if that's going to be good enough. Nobody is pointing out he avoided to appreciate his team's work when he was asked for it in his aftermatch interview. There's something going in there, I believe it's an issue, and he es lacking the motivation he always had in the past.

Amy and Joel - don't you think it's time for the three to be Alcaraz, Sinner and Djokovic? Would love to hear your analysis on the current champions as opposed to erstwhile Big 3.

You predicted Novak will win 😅😂

The emergence of players like Alcaraz reinforces my opinion that there is no Goat in any 1 to 1 sport as long as the sport continues, however I agree with the Best or most Successful of his Generation or period( 7-8 years?). That would be Graf, Serena, Sampras, Roger, Novak…and maybe now Carlos if he stays healthy.

Djokovic is not any slower compared to 12 months ago. He wasn't fast enough for Alcarez in 2023, then and now. Federer is not competing. And Djokovic is without a coach. There's no better time than now for Federer to teach Djokovic how to volley. Otherwise Djokovic will be racking up runner-up trophies prior to his inevitable retirement.

The heir to "The Big Three" has arrived.

It makes sense because the Spanish people in the UK is from Spain. I think the 'TH' is more used in Spain

I love this show!

29:10 It's called Gh-shtaad, coming from a Swiss German native speaker.

Pepperstone rankings have Sinner #1. Novak still at #2 and carlos still at 3. i guess carlos just got to keep his 1000 points from last year..but Novak got 600 new point‼️for reaching finals

Novak is but a shell of his former self, much of this is do to age and throw in the latest minor knee surgery and it was destined that he would get crushed when he faced a great player like alcaraz. HE absoloutely got washed out to sea and should not have played wimbledon. His main goal should have been the olympics this year. He has a big hole in his resume for not having a gold medal and he should have rested for the olympics

AL_Ká-raz, the stress is on the second syllable!

Show about Djokovic primarily. LOL. The show is sounding archaic and not keeping up with the times. Still hung up on one retired dude, one almost an exhibition player and one close to the finish line. Why not at least put Alcaraz, Sinner, Djokovic as the 3?

Novax had a weak draw