"you are now as a ranger able to command your beast with a bonus action" The same one I use to cast Hunter's Mark? The main ability the class revolves around now?

I can't believe as a lvl 20 ranger i get the aswome ability of +2 to dmg Truly wotc out did them self

The only explanation is that at some point Jeremy played in a group where a Ranger PC bullied him and he decided the class would never be playable again.

"Gloomstalkers do a lot of psychic damage!" Ah yes. Forgot how crazy powerful a single d8 of damage is

Why didn't they just make hunters mark a feature instead of just free casting a spell? They're making it such a necessity yet limiting it so much. You could just make it a feature so that 1. Doesnt need concentration and 2. Make it genuinely unique

"The ranger is now a completly new class" *Proceeds to describe the Tasha's Options for the Ranger*

So.....Am I making jokes that the Ranger still sucks? Or the party doesn't need him until level 10?

Level 20: Cleric: I summon *GOD!* Fighter: *Takes out whole squad by themselves with 8 attacks* Wizard: *Casts Wish to rewrite reality* Druid: *Becomes an immortal forest god* Paladin: *Turns into an angel* Ranger: Hey guys, look! I can do an average of 4 more damage a round!

Ranger needs to be an exploration themed mirror of the paladin to be successful. Focusing the entire class around a level 1 concentration spell with no scaling(until levels 13,17, and 20) is simply not it. Give the ranger a climb and swim speed. Let them choose two expertise skills between Nature, Perception, Stealth, and Survival. And them give them the other two they don't choose at a higher level. Give them the paladin smite feature, but instead of nova damage it is damage plus status effects, such as blinded, restrained, exhausted, or frightened. Or prone, disarming, or shoving, like a battle master. Make it so that these conditions don't get saves. Eldritch smite has a no save prone, swords bard has a no save shove, I don't wanna hear people saying this is broken or OP. For the frightened, restrained and blind just make it so it lasts for one round instead of a save. Instead of Divine Smite call it Nature's Fury. Now the ranger has a resource to expend that isn't chewing up their bonus action, so it can play much nicer with beast master, gloom stalker, etc. At the end of the day, so what if it ends up being over tuned? Rangers have been dog water for a long, long time, while paladin has been S tier. Give the ranger some love.

Did he just say that my level 20 ability that i spent so much time working for.... increases my damage to a single enemy im concentrating on... by 2

Capstone for Ranger: +2 damage, meanwhile wizards are a fireball machine gun... Ehh, for my table I'll probably just homebrew it that it is a free action to cast, and/or doesn't need concentration, that feels better as a cap stone feature.

"Just play a Fighter with a bow, it's better!" -JoCat Still true today.

So we all agree to homebrew no concentration hunters mark.

To steal a line from The Waterboy: "Oh no, we suck again!" 😑

"We are looking at features to make sure they are the right action economy. Sometimes removing the action cost all together" *makes paladin Channel Divinity options apply on an attack* *also keeps hunter's mark a bonus action AND concentration*

im still crying that hunter’s mark STILL requires concentration. the free uses are great but come on a paladin doesnt have to concentrate on their aura, why does a ranger have to concentrate on their core class feature. its dumb af.

So we all agree that we are gonna make our own Ranger if a player at our table wants to play one

How did this pass playtesting? Did the spell list actually cut out the massive number of concentration spells that compete vs hunters mark? Why oh why.

What an abysmal design. Seriously basing that much of the class around hunter's mark when it prevents you from using at least half of your spell list because it eats concentration and they balanced the class around the idea that hunter's mark is always up...

"One of our misses in the 2014 ranger is we had some really nice flavorful abilities having to do with different environments or different types of creatures that didn't really deliver a reliable, concrete game experience" Which is exactly why we have scrapped those abilities entirely, and in their place we have made the ranger's theme about dealing an additional d6 of damage to one creature, once per turn.

So you are telling me, instead of taking the opportunity to make Hunter's Mark a Class Feature without concentration. They keep it useless at higher levels and even claim that the lvl 20 cap stone ability is a damage increase of 2 points at average only if you use a spell that gets out scaled at that lvl. Feels like they on purpose choose to ignore the community on that one. No concentration needed after lvl 5. No dmg scaling for up casting. Triggers once per turn. And slowly scales from 1d6 to 1d8 than to 1d10 that was the better version, and they decided to make it useless.

They absolutely missed the "mark" with this one. So very disappointed. To sum up: -They presented Tasha's optional features as brand new features. -Made a bunch of new features centered around Hunter's Mark, making it feel like a required use for the Ranger, without buffing it in the levels ranger will mostly be played in. -Nerfed gloomstalker while leaving in the most problematic feature (invisible to creatures that rely on darkvision). I don't understand this at all. -Made a couple minor tweaks to features that are more lateral changes. They seem to be trying to funnel ranger characters into one playstyle. This is just a worse version of other classes. Just play a fighter/druid or a warlock. Warlock got so much love and the ranger just got the shaft.

Okay, so let me throw my thoughts in: • REMOVE CONCENTRATION FROM HUNTER’S MARK. There are a million words in the English language, yet through no combination of them can I accurately string together how badly I hate this. There are tons of great options in the Ranger list as-is that require concentration, and are better than an extra d6 of damage that only I can benefit from. Ashardalon’s Stride, Summons, Swift Quiver, Flame and Lightning Arrows, Tree Stride, Guardian of Nature, Stoneskin, Wind Wall, even Ensnaring and Zephyr Strike at level one! I’m okay with making Hunter’s Mark central to the class, but for the love of the gods and all that is holy, it needs more! • The level 20 ability *actually* makes me angry. Like, imagine you’ve played an expansive campaign with a party of your friends and have kept your Ranger alive and pushed them to the apex of their abilities, and all you get is an average damage boost of 2 while you have Hunter’s Mark up. Does that feel like an open slap in the face to anyone else, or just me? • For a completely rebuilt class, I’m seeing a LOT of features plundered from Tasha’s. They were cool features and all, but this isn’t the same Ranger anymore. Maybe it’s time we move on past them. • Hunter rework actually sounds really cool, interested in trying it out to see how it feels. Same with Beast Master. • I always thought Gloom Stalker was more Underdark aligned than Shadowfell. Not that I mind; I actually like the idea of subclasses geared towards certain planes. It opens up my creativity to things like Horizon Walkers geared toward the Astral Plane, Clockpunks geared toward Mechanus, Avengers from the Upper Planes, or Demon Slayers diving into the Abyss. Overall, 5/10. Homebrew will fix Rangers for us again down the line.

Looks like dad burned the food. Ranger bros are not eating tonight.

Hunters mark still requires concentration. Why is this single spell, still the core class mechanic of the class? Why isn't it a class feature? Why does it require concentration? No other classes core feature requires concentration.

Tasha, can I copy your homework? Yeah, just change some things, so it's not obvious.

Full list of fighting styles? Nice! I can't wait to take archery from a bigger pool.

It's really disappointing that the Hunter's Mark feature requires concentration and uses a bonus action to cast. It seems like it would be the equivalent for a Rogue to have to use concentration and a bonus action to use sneak attack.

You can't even blame your unearthed arcana feedback for this because EVERYONE ALREADY VOICED THEIR COMPLAINTS FOR THIS!

This is the first class revision that looks terrible, I sincerely liked all the others up to this one. How WotC keeps basing the Ranger's combat around a single bad 1st level spell in spite of receiving at least 4 passes of feedback now that is heavily disliked, I will never understand. Hunter's Mark sucks and is not fun to use. Stop forcing Rangers to use it just to keep up with other classes damage. Of course it's too late now since these books are already printed in a warehouse somewhere.

Man this is the second time today Im watching two dudes deliver lies and disappointment.

If the whole class is built on Hunter's Mark how are we supposed to be able to use any other spell if it is concentration? Also the buffs are at 13/17 for a 1d10 dmg? Are you realy going to concentrate on Hunter's Mark in Tier 2 and 3 of play? Such a disaster of a class, just make it concetration free at lvl 13 and the class is at least decent. Like this is atrocious for a class. So sad because I like almost every other change we got to see thus far in all other classes.

Fighters: "If I miss, I just hit" Wizards: "I can counterspell, and if it doesn't work, I don't use my spell slot" Paladin: "Everyone around me gets lots of bonuses because I am awesome!" Ranger: "I get +2 to damage, am I useful yet guys?"

Rangers rule. But I gotta wait 20 levels before Hunters Mark damage increases? Weak

Hope this class get some love. The playtest was a pain in my heart, so i really want it to be good in the final book Cross my heart that if the Ranger doesn't get cool features I'm just making a homebrew version of the class for my group

Pros: We now have a version of the ranger on par with the old 2014 classes. Cons: I guess we wait till 2034 to get a ranger on par with the other 2024 classes. Class is entirely dependent on a single first level concentration spell, as soon as you try to do anything else with concentration most of your class features disappear. :( :(

Sorcerer cap: summon a dragon. Ranger cap: d10 baebyyy!

Not making hunters mark a base class feature that doesn’t use spell slots and dosent require concentration is a huge missed opportunity to allow rangers to not only be stronger but let them use more of their spells

I didn't think it could of been done. But they made Ranger even worse to play now. I just don't have anymore words.

If wizards don't do the ranger justice,it's going to be really bad

The problem with relying so much on hunters mark as a feature is as you get higher levels hunters mark isn’t really that good. Also the buffs they added are added really really late. I played a Tasha’s Ranger from level 1-11 and I stopped using hunters mark really early in the campaign. What’s the point of having a bunch of good Druid concentration spells when they are basically telling us, “use the utility Druid spells out of combat and hunters mark in combat. We even gave you free uses of Hunter’s mark! USE IT!!” That’s so boring to me. Would much rather entangle or spike growth.

Druid: A full spellcasting class. We wanted to give druids that didn't want to cast spells something to do with their spell slots (ie: wildshape / summon a animal friend). Ranger: A full martial class with limited spellcasting abilities. We gave you a spell you are required to use to do any damage at all, which takes your concentration slot up permanently. And don't forget to be excited about the enhanced spell list. Seems like Ranger is still a dip only class :(.

What's so annoying about the ranger being one of the worst classes mechanically is they're the most iconic class in lore and media. Aragon, Drizzt, The Witcher, John Snow, Katniss, etc. When people think of a hero in an adventure a Ranger is the 1st image that comes to mind and they get shafted constantly. Animal companion should be part of the core class with the beast master getting extra benefits, hunter's mark should scale throughout the class or not require concentration, climb and swim speed should be much earlier, they should have an arcane archer type subclass that makes them a clear front runner for best ranged weapon user

So, are we still having to pick between casting _Hunter's Mark_ and telling our beast to DO something on round 1? I mean, I'm liking all the changes so far, but that one thing staying is very frustrating.

You guys could've easily had Favored Foe from Tasha's Cauldron, since you copy pasted from the book and didnt change it much if at all for Ranger, work as the "Hunter's Mark" ability you guys have setup with the following improvements: It no longer requires concentration. Regain uses on a short or long rest. Possibly a damage buff such as: lvl 1 1d4, lvl 4 1d6, lvl 8 1d8, lvl 14 1d10, lvl 20 1d12. (just spitballing that, not definitive) That's it, that was all that really needed to happen. You already had uses equal to your proficiency bonus which is great as it would automatically build with you. And without concentration you could mark multiple creatures if you want for 1 minute to deal extra damage to them, which means: *You no longer have your bonus action and concentration eaten by a very mediocre spell when there are much better options in the Ranger spell list, not to mention your beast commands as Beastmaster also require a bonus action now.* *OR* you could have combined the two still have the Hunter's Mark thing but it does not require concentration and the damage improves MUCH sooner not *starting* to improve at 13th level, and being able to mark multiple creatures if you wish too. These changes are nice but they are very much *not* sufficient when compared to all the other classes and subclasses thus far, you guys *really* dropped the ball with this one. I still look forward to the rest but man this was a real blunder.

I realized the reason why I love the Ranger class is because I can relate to them being the neglected middle child

Don’t care if the print run is delayed. Fix the Ranger. It doesn’t need another 2014 repeat. And for the love of everything make hunters mark a class ability that scales

They really said we're just gonna use the Tasha's Ranger. The only new things they actually gave Ranger were a few more expertise and languages, a feature that keeps from breaking concentration on hunters mark and the new most pitiful capstone. They're REALLY banking on people not reading any of the other books

I am so confused on why Relentless Hunter and Precise Hunters are at levels 13 and 17 rather than 5 and 13? It looks like rangers are the only class that doesn't get a feature at 5 besides extra attack. Precise Hunter also seems like Studied Attacks for the Fighter (level 13) but redressed for Hunter's Mark.

So now, not only will we still not cast hunters mark at high levels, but now we don't get class features either. Since they are all based around a 1st level spell. My disappointment with the new handbook has peaked

I don't get why they view Hunters mark being non concentration as problematic when Radient strikes exists

The output of huntersmark over the course of an entire fight isn't significantly greater than divine smite. It's like WOTC thinks a spell should have concentration just because it has a duration and not because concentration actually improves the spell

Too much focus on Hunter’s Mark. If it really was designed as the identity or bread and butter of the Ranger, it either needed better and earlier scaling, or not requiring concentration. Rangers have access to really great spells, but are pigeonholed into Hunter’s mark if they don’t want their damage to fall off a cliff. These changes don’t fix that, and if anything make them worse. Two extra expertise skills at level 19 are neat, but what exactly is that supposed to accomplish? Most campaigns don’t go that high, and even if they do, Expertise is honestly pretty easy to get past that point. I could see this being awesome at 8th or 10th level, 19 is just too late.

2024 Ranger is now the 2014 Monk

Hunters Mark should be a class feature without being spell or require concentration that should scale accordingly. Many Ranger spells compete for concentration. Why add more to the pile?

I hate to say it but this was disappointing. Giving up on letting the Ranger have a unique exploration feature so it actually feels like a Ranger and shoving a bunch of expertise down it's throat is sad, but then you tell us that all it's combat improvements are minimalistic buffs to Hunters Mark, and it's clear that this Ranger (outside of Weapon Mastery) is directly inferior to the Tasha's variant of the 2014 Ranger.

“So all our feedback was that Rangers were too powerful and too fun to play, so we nerfed them.” Okay but seriously, how is Hunter’s Mark STILL just a *worse Hex?* And now it’s central to the class. WARLOCKS can play Rangers better than Rangers can.

They could have hit the Mark with making a better Ranger, if they weren't too busy concentrating on something else.

So like do y'all just hate ranger?

Hunters mark improvements are so very late in the levels You could've easily get concentration thing on level one and it would've been fine

This is literally the litmus test to see if they can finally learn all their lessons.

"At 13th level, concentration can't be broken on hunter's mark. Still have to concentration on it - This is important so that you can't stack it with other things." Right, god forbid we can stack an extra 1d6 on attacks against one target with another concentration spell. Meanwhile, paladins get an extra 1d8 on all their attacks at level 11.

Q: If the DM describes a helmet on the ground in front of my Ranger do I (A.) Roll to kick it, and (B.) If successful do I break my toe or do we proceed like nothing's happened?

10:10 "you still require concentration on the spell (Hunters Mark). This is important so it doesn't stack with other things that require concentration." Unless Hunters Mark has undergone a massive redesign and is now a Fireball level insane option this is a terrible decision made with bad logic. A Ranger concentrating on a level one spell in Tier 3 and 4 play is making an extremely poor decision on how to use their limited class resources.

"Don't forget to pre-order our first new sourcebook releasing Q4 2024 where we introduce a totally new subclass, The Ranger! We promise it is fixed this time! ;)"

For the love of god, just make Hunter’s Mark a class ability. If you’re going to give the class special interactions with the spell, LEAN INTO IT. Give every subclass a unique bonus to it. Basically all of the subclasses have some kind of feature when you first choose them to add a little damage to one attack and a special effect on top of that. They usually require a bonus action too. Wrap it all up in there, “when you attack your Marked target do X too.” Incorporare it into the class so that it can be a unique selling point just like Smite is for Paladins.

Sad to see them double down on making Favored Foe just a Hunters Mark tool. Love the concept of being an expert in fighting a specific monster type and would rather that get improved and expanded upon rather than just "You get some free Hunters Marks :)" Also give ranger melee specific spells for the love of god

80% of players never see lvl 9 and above. Wotc: lets put all the ‘okay’ ranger stuff after lvl 10. that will show em!

The cost of a bonus action to make your beast attack is why the Beastmaster is always going to be the lesser subclass. The capstone is astoundingly lackluster. Hunter's Mark should not have been a spell. Neither should Divine Smite. What are you guys even thinking?

This the hardest I ever been blue balled before. Brand "new" class was the biggest lie I've been told next to my dad saying we can go to McDonald's as a kid.

While I am excited for all these... Ranger still needed more love. Like.... we have to wait until level 13 for OUR Hunter's Mark to be better?!! And damage only goes up by 2 at level 20?! 20?! No No.

so hunter's mark is all over Ranger now, but how are those buffs helpful to a beast master or drake warden or any Subclass that is using their bonus actions on other things?

I really hope it's not too late to make changes. The Ranger really needed to be improved, especially it's reliance on concentration. They did not do this, and instead made it nigh impossible to concentrate on anything else other than hunters mark. This class would be a lot better (as many have already said) if hunters mark was a free class ability and not concentration. If rogues can do piles of d6 of damage each turn, it should be easy to for a ranger to do an extra d6 per attack with some added features. I feel that if ranger had focused maybe on something like nature/hunting flavored invocations that give hunters mark the eldritch blast treatment, along with giving rangers more optional features to choose from, this would allow players to form more of their own unique identity for their ranger, instead of being stuck as a lackluster fighter with some druid flavor tossed in.

BG3 was a godsend. Since it dropped I've already been in 2 campaigns where everyone's unanimously agreed that, "yeah were just gonna change ranger to how it is in BG3, with some tweaks since BG3 only goes to lvl 12."

If they're gonna build up on the last playtest like most of what we've seen so far... I REALLY hope they make using Hunters Mark worth while. They give you tons of benefits at high levels but you only get free castings at minimum level making it useless past level 4. If you're gonna concentrate on something, there are tons of better options. Either upcast my free uses or give it a no-concentration upgrade past certain level. That would fix a lot.

Great, the one thing that should be a mechanical feature of the ranger, Hunter’s Mark, is still a spell, which prevents you from using any other spells during combat. All the other features of ranger suck, because very few tables use the exploration pillar. Ranger is my favorite class, btw.

The reliance on hunters mark has me worried. How fun this is to play will directly rely on how the new spells work.

Of all the awesome concentration spells that ranger gets, they decided to focus on Hunter's Mark, which got nerfed hard in the playtest and never did anything interesting to begin with (compared to the other cool spells they get). Hoping the at least remove its concentration requirement.

I really hope that they make Hunter's Mark able to be cast on tracks of a creature, as well as allowing Bonus Action Study and Search to assess/find your mark. I really want the latter "Ribbon" part of that spell to actually do something "Rangery" rather than the spell just be used for boring damage. Free concentration-less uses on Favored enemies would be nice too to get some of that flavor back.

I like most of the changes but the upgrades to Hunter's Mark comes in really late for no reason... Like making it's concentration be unbreakable by damage is nice but... level 13? That sounds like a 6th or 7th level feature. Then having advantage on attacks against marked creatures is also really good but come on, level 17? Wizards get Wish and Rangers get advantage on one creature. This sounds like a level 11 or 13 feature. Don't even get me started on the damage increase from d6 to d10. You could make it just a d10 from the beginning and I don't think anybody would be blown away. You'd maybe get a "Oh nice!" Regardless, that at Level 20 must be an actual crime.

Ok here is the fix. Hunters mark for free (Proficiency Bonus) times per day. No concentration required. At level (whatever. 7, 9 who cares) creatures that are friendly to you also benefit from hunters mark. Everything else stays the same. Boom. Synergy. Damage. Done.

If you’re going to make a class reliant on a spell. (First off don’t I thought they learned from the Warlock and eldritch Blast) that spell cannot require concentration. Also with the hunter removing options is not a buff

This is the one I’m really interested in. The 1st playtest ranger needed some flavor, the 2nd was just a travesty. And the proposed Gloomstalker changes were abhorrent.

Jesus Christ… they still s*** the bed with Hunter’s Mark… no one is going to want to concentrate on something that gives 1d6 extra damage beyond Tier 1. What a huge misstep…

I think ranger is the most anticipated class. Monk previously was, but given the nearly unanimous approval of the previous UA, i think we can feel pretty confident of its direction.

So you want to increase Ranger's focus on using utility spells, which are mostly concentration, and then you make the defining feature of Rangers Hunter's mark...a concentration spell. My hopes were so high with how good the other classes looks, that was a mistake. I've played ranger for years now, next campaign with this sourcebook will be when I finally switch to something else I guess.

Literally the ONLY THING that will make this class work is if they added like 15 new Ranger-specific spells that are different types of awesome arrows and stuff.

Wow, they really went out of their way to just gloss over the Beastmaster without going into any real depth or detail. “It gets better as you level up.” Well technically so did the 2014 one but it scaled poorly. I’m glad for the bonus action command and the eventual sharing of spells but something of substance would have been nice.

Do they realize that playing a warden Druid without wild-shaping is arguably better then this "Ranger." I might have to try that now.

My play circle can't help but compare the Ranger to the Paladin as they are both classes that embody the martial aspect of a full caster counterpart (cleric and druid) While the Paladin has an evocative and powerful mechanical identity, for the Ranger that's far less the case, something I hope will be rectified.

A free concentration spell to prevent you from casting other concentration spells Y'all really missed the mark on this one. Not as terrible as Divine Smite, but yikes. How hard would it have been to say "when you use a designated charge of Hunters Mark, it requires no concentration. If you choose to cast this spell using a spell slot, it then requires concentration." Or even adding an option to upcast it for an additional 1d6 per leveled spell slot above the first. My mind is blown that WotC continues to rush to get this PHB out during the 50 year anniversary, just for the novelty of it. Meanwhile, they're sacrificing quality.

I like the idea of the subclasses buffing hunters mark in their own unique ways. But it doesn't sound like gloomstalker and feywanderer do anything for it. Am I missing something?

So could I cast polymorph on myself and my beast also get turned so we have two giants apes 👀

Tasha's Ranger with the added class framework bonuses like weapon masteries and spellcasting adjustments. I'm afraid that without them clarifying how often a day you can use Tireless and Vanish it's most likely still the nerfed version that uses Wisdom for uses. Also saying "the ranger is basically a whole new class, and you'll see that be the case if you've played a ranger in the last 10 years" makes no sense when 2024 Ranger is just TCE's Ranger Revised. The quality of life improvements are nice but it's not really that much of a change for the Ranger. Can't wait to read more into the subclasses, where I assume more of the class' power will reside. Getting the feeling that 2024 Ranger will still need homebrew adjustments to help it keep up with other classes. Fingers crossed though

I was so excited to hear that rangers would get an improved hunters mark, but damn that was underwhelming

good grief. all that play testing, and this is what you came up with?

I'm disappointed that the Ranger is still built around Hunter's Mark. It's an okay low-level spell; but who is concentrating on low-level spells in mid- to high-levels? Sigh. Yet again, I'll have to decide whether the Ranger needs houserules to use its features. I'll have to run math and examine spell lists to determine whether concentration-free Hunter's Mark will be too much. Alternatively, I'll have to decide whether all these Hunter's Mark features need to be replaced. Very disappointing. EDIT: It's always possible that they've redesigned most of the Ranger spells to no longer require Concentration. Does that seem likely, though, from the guys who believe Hunter's Mark is this strong and relevant?

"A person who ranges far and wide." Thank you Jeremy lol. This, in my mind is what a Ranger is. Someone like Aragorn or Drizzt. Too long have my friends thought rangers needed to be constrained to use of bows. While I get that interpretation and playstyle, never once have I played a ranger that wasn't melee-based.

My Fix for the Rangers Favored Terrain. Natural Explorer Also at 1st level, you are particularly familiar with one type of natural environment and are adept at traveling and surviving in such regions. Choose one type of favored terrain: arctic, coast, desert, forest, grassland, mountain, swamp, the Underdark, Undersea, or Urban. While in your favored terrain Animal Handling, Investigation, Nature, Perception, Stealth, and Survival checks are made at advantage. While traveling for an hour or more in your favored terrain, you gain the following benefits: - Difficult terrain doesn’t slow your group’s travel. - Your group can’t become lost except by magical means. - Even when you are engaged in another activity while traveling (such as foraging, navigating, or tracking), you remain alert to danger. - If you are traveling alone, you can move stealthily at a normal pace. - When you forage, you find twice as much food as you normally would. - While tracking other creatures, you also learn their exact number, their sizes, and how long ago they passed through the area. At 6th level while in your favored terrain you cannot be surprised while you are conscious, and you gain advantage on initiative roles. In addition, you may choose second favored terrain. You must have spent at least 24 hours traveling through the terrain that is selected. At 10th level you have learned to use your favored terrain to your advantage in combat. While in your favored terrain you always have the advantage of half cover and you gain +2 to hit on your attack roles. In addition, you may choose a third favored terrain. You must have spent at least 24 hours traveling through the terrain that is selected. Capstone ability. All terrains are considered your favored terrains

Literally should just give Concentration Free Hunter’s Mark at level 5 or 6 if the spell gonna be this core to the class. Trust me it won’t break the game. Foe Slayer should be given at level 13, 1d10 instead of 1d6 is not that strong. And level 20 should just give ranger +wisdom to damage on every attack to their hunter’s mark target.