Do We Need a New Theory of Everything? Sabine Hossenfelder, Carlo Rovelli & Eric Weinstein ​⁠

  Рет қаралды 10,564

Dr Brian Keating

Dr Brian Keating

23 күн бұрын

Join my mailing list briankeating.com/list to win a real 4 billion year old meteorite! All .edu emails in the USA 🇺🇸 will WIN!
I co-hosted a thrilling conversation @TheInstituteOfArtAndIdeas between Sabine Hossenfelder, Carlo Rovelli, and Eric Weinstein as they debated quantum physics, consciousness, and the mystery of reality. In this clip, we talked about whether there was a need for a new Theory of Everything.
Enjoy the full video kzfaq.infomXKPeJ-p...
We imagine physics is objective. But quantum physics found the act of human observation changes the outcome of experiment. Many scientists assume this central role of the observer is limited to just quantum physics. But is this an error? As Heisenberg puts it, "what we observe is not nature in itself but nature exposed to our method of questioning." In all our studies of reality and nature then, the observer plays a role -- not just in quantum physics.
Should we recognise science can never access reality independent of the observer? Should we re-define science not as uncovering objective reality, but as uncovering the functions, limitations and structures of the mind of the observer themselves? And if we cannot remove the observer, might quantum physics help us to understand the observer - as Roger Penrose suggests consciousness "reeks of something quantum mechanical."
The Institute of Art and Ideas features videos and articles from cutting edge thinkers discussing the ideas that are shaping the world, from metaphysics to string theory, technology to democracy, aesthetics to genetics. Subscribe today!
If you enjoyed this clip, check out our full conversation on the IAI channel: • LIVE: Quantum Physics ...
Additional resources:
➡️ Follow me on your fav platforms:
✖️ Twitter: / drbriankeating
🔔 KZfaq: kzfaq.info...
📝 Join my mailing list: briankeating.com/list
✍️ Check out my blog: briankeating.com/cosmic-musings/
🎙️ Follow my podcast: briankeating.com/podcast
Into the Impossible with Brian Keating is a podcast dedicated to all those who want to explore the universe within and beyond the known.
Make sure to subscribe so you never miss an episode!
#intotheimpossible #briankeating #theoryofeverything

Пікірлер: 105
@DrBrianKeating
@DrBrianKeating 21 күн бұрын
What is the best hope for a Theory Of Everything, String Theory or something else?
@robpeereboom7941
@robpeereboom7941 21 күн бұрын
The electric universe
@SpotterVideo
@SpotterVideo 21 күн бұрын
What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Hopf Fibrations of Eric Weinstein and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common? In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit). Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature. Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton....
@amedeeabreo7334
@amedeeabreo7334 21 күн бұрын
I've studied physics all my life and also read some religions. I always discounted religions a very unlikely. But phyiscs has become even more unlikely with the proposal of 11 dimensions that are too small to ever be detected but somehow essential to the existence of the universe. Now the bible is more logical so maybe I'll just accept Genesis and have done with it. String theory gives no experimental results at all, yet we are be preached at by science just like the evangelists preach the bible.
@fredod4669
@fredod4669 21 күн бұрын
Soon it’s gonna be all about feelings and not even need to think about things just feel your way there … lol
@gorgthesalty
@gorgthesalty 21 күн бұрын
​@amedeeabreo7334 benefit of going with science is that someone just may revamp the whole thing to everyone's satisfaction. With religion, no one will. Religions are not mutable.
@DMichaelAtLarge
@DMichaelAtLarge 21 күн бұрын
Do we need a new Theory of Everything? I didn't know we had an old one yet.
@smlanka4u
@smlanka4u 20 күн бұрын
Binary Mathematical Physics theory is an existing ToE.
@DMichaelAtLarge
@DMichaelAtLarge 20 күн бұрын
@@smlanka4u I wasn't thinking of "theory" as a speculative hypothesis without empirical verification. We got a bazillion ToE's if you're not fussy about actual evidence to verify them.
@smlanka4u
@smlanka4u 20 күн бұрын
@@DMichaelAtLarge, If you look at the verification and predictions I have provided based on it, then you can accept or reject it.
@igorsawicki4905
@igorsawicki4905 21 күн бұрын
Im disappointed that there is no information when was it recorded 😢
@lukegratrix
@lukegratrix 21 күн бұрын
I'm unsubscribed! Free at last! Write more books about your struggles Weinstein and Keating.
@Oentience
@Oentience 21 күн бұрын
Read the description. Thanks Brian!
@monty3854
@monty3854 21 күн бұрын
​@@lukegratrixTotal shills. I wish these types of people didn't get all the good guests.
@igorsawicki4905
@igorsawicki4905 21 күн бұрын
Is it reupload number 4?
@IncompleteTheory
@IncompleteTheory 21 күн бұрын
Its pathetic.
@fredod4669
@fredod4669 21 күн бұрын
Need more time , need to learn more . Thank you
@chrismcmullen4313
@chrismcmullen4313 21 күн бұрын
If i had eyebrows like Dr Keating id look at them from every angle too
@Skyborn-
@Skyborn- 20 күн бұрын
When I was doing research into creating a new form of computer capable of 3D imagery, I needed to create a language that could categorize and quantify all events or observations. I discovered that all data can be qualified and quantified into Time, Place, and Power. These 3 things are needed to begin the categorizing. All things can be quantified and qualified under these 3 headings. Being human means we mistakenly think that humans are the primary observers, and thus, we are the center of the universe. The planet that bares us and many other life forms is the observer and barer of good and bad news. We are part of a system of life on planet Earth, we do not have the right to destroy it, or it's potential to culture life. When we try to see the world as a big bang we are missing the millions of fine details that make the real world reality. The world is complex. There are very few cataclysmic cosmic events in our skys( irony intended ). Time has ticked for billions of years to create a highly stable cosmic reality as we know it now. Many planets could have started intelligent life more than 10 billion years ago, or 2 million years ago. The difference is not significant. Life could have started on many planets long before we ever started our cosmic trecks. There is a degree of inevitability to the nature of a planet supporting life of various forms that come to realize that to survive on the long term it must potentiate itself to be interplanetary. As all planets may have cataclysmic global events. The more creative power and the more constructive potential, the greater the likelihood the species will evolve and become an interplanetary species. To not disturb the local wild life, being observed is limited by the advanced interplanetary creatures. Don't disturb the local wildlife. Educate the wise ones only.
@hyperduality2838
@hyperduality2838 19 күн бұрын
Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. All numbers fall within the complex plane. Real is dual to imaginary -- complex numbers are dual. All numbers are dual. The integers are self dual as they are their own conjugates. Categories (form, syntax, objects) are dual to sets (substance, semantics, subjective) -- category theory. Quantity is dual to quality. The tetrahedron is self dual -- just like the integers. The cube is dual to the octahedron. The dodecahedron is dual to the icosahedron -- the Platonic solids. Messages in a communication system are predicted into existence according to Shannon's information theorem -- a syntropic process, teleological. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Mind (syntropy) is dual to matter (entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line. All forms of communication require photons or the probability field of electro-magnetism and photons are dual. Waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality, pure energy is dual. Physical waves (real photons, syntax) are dual to probability (imaginary, semantics). "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@RWin-fp5jn
@RWin-fp5jn 20 күн бұрын
Nice subject! I wonder what Bernardo Kastrup’s comment would be about those who seek a ToE? To me the quest for a ToE implies first and foremost we don’t want to throw away anything we have collected so far. Like waving a magic want, we expect there to be some super complex add-on theory which ties everything up with a nice ribbon, making everybody happy. You know what that reminds me of? It reminds me of hoarders. Anyone ever seen such shows on TV where hoarders come for help to clean their house, yet start whining and become mean when some items are to be thrown away. Some think that is good entertainment, but we are really looking at an acknowledged psychiatric illness. These people need to be treated. So to me that is the same as those who claim to seek a ToE. They don’t. They just don’t want to throw aways their individual pet theories. And in order not to hurt anyone’s feelings, instead of tidying up, they collectively agree they must go on a new journey to keep all and add new stuff. I am sorry. That is not how it works. The community needs to clean out its house, starting at the basement. At the basement we have two Einsteinian theories. One says there is no grid and all speeds are relative (Special Relativity) the other says there must be a grid (spacetime) and it crucial to have gravity work (General Relativity). Obviously you can NOT have both a grid and no grid at the same time. So dear gentlemen and women of the community, please select one as the correct one (spoiler alert it’s the latter) and consequently correct the other one. If you start there, your house will come in order without adding anything. ToE is a hoax, a pacifier. It’s all in our minds.
@hyperduality2838
@hyperduality2838 19 күн бұрын
Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. All numbers fall within the complex plane. Real is dual to imaginary -- complex numbers are dual. All numbers are dual. The integers are self dual as they are their own conjugates. Categories (form, syntax, objects) are dual to sets (substance, semantics, subjective) -- category theory. Quantity is dual to quality. The tetrahedron is self dual -- just like the integers. The cube is dual to the octahedron. The dodecahedron is dual to the icosahedron -- the Platonic solids. Messages in a communication system are predicted into existence according to Shannon's information theorem -- a syntropic process, teleological. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Mind (syntropy) is dual to matter (entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line. All forms of communication require photons or the probability field of electro-magnetism and photons are dual. Waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality, pure energy is dual. Physical waves (real photons, syntax) are dual to probability (imaginary, semantics). "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@MasoudJohnAzizi
@MasoudJohnAzizi 20 күн бұрын
Prof. Dr. Donald Hoffman of UC Irvine offers us the "theory of everything" that is scientifically valid.
@metroidprime3863
@metroidprime3863 21 күн бұрын
I would love to see a debate like this again.
@hyperduality2838
@hyperduality2838 19 күн бұрын
Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. All numbers fall within the complex plane. Real is dual to imaginary -- complex numbers are dual. All numbers are dual. The integers are self dual as they are their own conjugates. Categories (form, syntax, objects) are dual to sets (substance, semantics, subjective) -- category theory. Quantity is dual to quality. The tetrahedron is self dual -- just like the integers. The cube is dual to the octahedron. The dodecahedron is dual to the icosahedron -- the Platonic solids. Messages in a communication system are predicted into existence according to Shannon's information theorem -- a syntropic process, teleological. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Mind (syntropy) is dual to matter (entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line. All forms of communication require photons or the probability field of electro-magnetism and photons are dual. Waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality, pure energy is dual. Physical waves (real photons, syntax) are dual to probability (imaginary, semantics). "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@FigmentHF
@FigmentHF 20 күн бұрын
I think our theory of everything will ultimately be a theory of us. It will be a description of our brains model of reality.
@hyperduality2838
@hyperduality2838 19 күн бұрын
"Know thyself" -- Socrates. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. All numbers fall within the complex plane. Real is dual to imaginary -- complex numbers are dual. All numbers are dual. The integers are self dual as they are their own conjugates. Categories (form, syntax, objects) are dual to sets (substance, semantics, subjective) -- category theory. Quantity is dual to quality. The tetrahedron is self dual -- just like the integers. The cube is dual to the octahedron. The dodecahedron is dual to the icosahedron -- the Platonic solids. Messages in a communication system are predicted into existence according to Shannon's information theorem -- a syntropic process, teleological. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Mind (syntropy) is dual to matter (entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line. All forms of communication require photons or the probability field of electro-magnetism and photons are dual. Waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality, pure energy is dual. Physical waves (real photons, syntax) are dual to probability (imaginary, semantics). "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@chicojcf
@chicojcf 21 күн бұрын
Really great discussion.
@arcangelorecchia1990
@arcangelorecchia1990 20 күн бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@Adam_Wegert
@Adam_Wegert 20 күн бұрын
Am I having deja vu or what?
@ablatt89
@ablatt89 20 күн бұрын
What exactly is a theory of everything? I would argue having a single equation with various factors in it may not be robust enough to describe all the physical phenomena of the universe. Suppose you find some mathematical equation that unifies the forces and gives robust predictions, this equation wouldn't suddenly describe the emergence of biology or other phenomena in the universe.
@saimbhat6243
@saimbhat6243 20 күн бұрын
Maxwells theory of electromagnetism is an analogue of theory of everything, but it has four equations, that entailed everything you could know about things electric and magnetic. So, just one equation isn't necessary. It is just a set of assumptions, which is Valid anywhere, for any kind of interaction. With no exceptions or qualifications or restricted range of parameters. It is the utopia of nerds. And all attempts at utopias end disappointingly.
@MojiWord
@MojiWord 20 күн бұрын
@@saimbhat6243 If it's *genuinely* an Equation of Everything, voila! Only that one equation's sufficient & necessary!!!
@hyperduality2838
@hyperduality2838 19 күн бұрын
Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. All numbers fall within the complex plane. Real is dual to imaginary -- complex numbers are dual. All numbers are dual. The integers are self dual as they are their own conjugates. Categories (form, syntax, objects) are dual to sets (substance, semantics, subjective) -- category theory. Quantity is dual to quality. The tetrahedron is self dual -- just like the integers. The cube is dual to the octahedron. The dodecahedron is dual to the icosahedron -- the Platonic solids. Messages in a communication system are predicted into existence according to Shannon's information theorem -- a syntropic process, teleological. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Mind (syntropy) is dual to matter (entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line. All forms of communication require photons or the probability field of electro-magnetism and photons are dual. Waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality, pure energy is dual. Physical waves (real photons, syntax) are dual to probability (imaginary, semantics). "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@advaitrahasya
@advaitrahasya 20 күн бұрын
Chasing the holy grail of a unifying mathematical model just requires more mathematical cleverness. Understand what models and experiments have been showing us for a century now is perhaps more to the point. Indeed, Space isn't empty, Time is illusory and Matter is made of no substance. Pick a paradigm in which those facts are expected, or just invert the paradigm in which they look "unintuitive". Make sure that it does not offend the principle that "existence is self-similar at many scales" Be realy parsimonious. Allow only one assumption: that "something" exists. And a hint from the old crib notes: that "something" is One, indivisible and undivided, and is best considered as a fluid (as so much of the mathematical modeling implies). Consider puzzling this lot out to be a beginner's exercise in basic metaphysics. After all, in some circles, it still is ;)
@hyperduality2838
@hyperduality2838 19 күн бұрын
Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. All numbers fall within the complex plane. Real is dual to imaginary -- complex numbers are dual. All numbers are dual. The integers are self dual as they are their own conjugates. Categories (form, syntax, objects) are dual to sets (substance, semantics, subjective) -- category theory. Quantity is dual to quality. The tetrahedron is self dual -- just like the integers. The cube is dual to the octahedron. The dodecahedron is dual to the icosahedron -- the Platonic solids. Messages in a communication system are predicted into existence according to Shannon's information theorem -- a syntropic process, teleological. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Mind (syntropy) is dual to matter (entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line. All forms of communication require photons or the probability field of electro-magnetism and photons are dual. Waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality, pure energy is dual. Physical waves (real photons, syntax) are dual to probability (imaginary, semantics). "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@gulsen8015
@gulsen8015 20 күн бұрын
Turkish subtitles please 😊
@depthsofpentecost2973
@depthsofpentecost2973 20 күн бұрын
An American, a German, and an Italian physicist walk into a bar…
@Killer_Kovacs
@Killer_Kovacs 21 күн бұрын
You did yourself dirty with that thumbnail 😂
@ONEYEDPiRAT
@ONEYEDPiRAT 21 күн бұрын
0:46 seriously with that accent I couldn't understand anything you said man and everybody Grinned. I feel left out!
@villadeste23
@villadeste23 20 күн бұрын
With a Little effort bro . Imagine being tired and stoned :))
@keppela1
@keppela1 20 күн бұрын
Why post this tiny blurb of people rushing to finish their thoughts?
@Riodijahdenirio
@Riodijahdenirio 21 күн бұрын
For me the old theory of everything is better.
@dadsonworldwide3238
@dadsonworldwide3238 21 күн бұрын
What makes it so hard to accept a reality generator? Why should we think nature should be any other way than it is ? In explaining the universe it only makes sense that it requires a universal model to explain it all
@hyperduality2838
@hyperduality2838 19 күн бұрын
Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. All numbers fall within the complex plane. Real is dual to imaginary -- complex numbers are dual. All numbers are dual. The integers are self dual as they are their own conjugates. Categories (form, syntax, objects) are dual to sets (substance, semantics, subjective) -- category theory. Quantity is dual to quality. The tetrahedron is self dual -- just like the integers. The cube is dual to the octahedron. The dodecahedron is dual to the icosahedron -- the Platonic solids. Messages in a communication system are predicted into existence according to Shannon's information theorem -- a syntropic process, teleological. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Mind (syntropy) is dual to matter (entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line. All forms of communication require photons or the probability field of electro-magnetism and photons are dual. Waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality, pure energy is dual. Physical waves (real photons, syntax) are dual to probability (imaginary, semantics). "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@dadsonworldwide3238
@dadsonworldwide3238 19 күн бұрын
@hyperduality2838 yes I mean it more mathematically. Yes it is a sublet of language we know when our curses & blessings began to be plagiarized into its addition & subtraction leading to standardized weights and measure in the ancient world market place. 1 for 1 symbols prescribed on physical objects is obviously the first maths . Only when Greeks are unpa8the successful social behaviors of prayer logic whatsboutism asking every possible question about a system to they form logic and phylosphy out of which set theory equations are created.
@dadsonworldwide3238
@dadsonworldwide3238 19 күн бұрын
Problem isn't in knowing what or where but mostly in the controversial religious desputes that lead us to revisionist history curriculum to say everything starts in greece. Early 1900s mass displacement of immigrants and the need to make American & uk colleges participatory for all the world to industrialize has caused us some real fundamental curriculum problems imo You can't eliminate arbitrary example in semantics and then create identifiers to hold one another accountable. Take population species for example, it looks good on paper but in practice expects talk past one another over the slightest variations. This is fine for a nfl fan who thinks theye roster on paper Is a playoff team but once put in excersize all the nilhism is witnessed and seen.
@dadsonworldwide3238
@dadsonworldwide3238 19 күн бұрын
@hyperduality2838 hamiltonian oscillating waves are absolutely subjective properties that works very sensible when correlated with idealized time. But the 3rd physical measure of 1st position Newton 2nd Einstein 3rd hiesenberg approach with a photon end in = physical mystification of uncertainty. This Is no different than when we take 3 granite rocks of any shape and grind them together = the most precise flattest surface known standard that tunes all our intrutements. Surface granite stone all machinest and tool and die uses. We have to many examples of the 3 body problem as many unfortunately call it. Statistical anylitics fail and demands physical measure to reorientate or renormalize telling us nature has its own orientation and direction and we don't see it top down form and shape or the ancient world would've predicted and invented everything instead of 1300s global peasant revolt theologically inspired scientifically studied mathematically confirmed Issac Newton almost mri machine line of thought. It's when he used Jesus christ unification of tripartite nature when he realized 1 idealism 2 subjectivism Could be treated as sigma 6 detection and still be credible as anything physical. 3rd physical Or unification of tripartite nature past present future. 1Individual, 2 physical objects 3 subjective space between Father son holy spirit. Out poped 1 soul agency correlated with eternal cosmos. 1 soul agency driver of 2 free will inertia that can get mobile or manipulate 3frame of reference. Vaccum energy,geater system at large ,eternal absolute cosmos Emerging energetic actors = 1 definable matter 2 lattus structure / body 3 critical extreme state or environment X ,y ,z + man made time hierarchy knowledge of Good and evil equations. Shocked the world forever
@dadsonworldwide3238
@dadsonworldwide3238 19 күн бұрын
@hyperduality2838 Semantics may be all that Athens greece give us and obviously it's been priceless and useful for the future to pluck useful things from here and they're . In most situations they didn't invent any of the syntac in my context of usages. Yet still invaluable formulations
@saimbhat6243
@saimbhat6243 21 күн бұрын
You know what is interesting Dr. Brian Keating? What you are indulging in here, is such a good example of sociology of science. The human aspect of science, where all the claimed objectivity of science cannot help you to decide objectively what hypothesis can potentially become science and what hypothesis can't potentially become science. A mere human judgement on how to do science. Afterall, science, if even claimed to be objective, is practiced by humans, with their human all too human character. It is not impossible, that some time in future from now on, physicists may converge on theories that you now claim to be not worth persuing, then people in future, sociologists of science of that time, will study your motivations, your judgements and your psychological make up, leading to your choice. What principle anyway guides the choice of investing into certain potential scientific theories and neglecting others? Is that principle a scientific principle too? What are the empirical evidence for that principle? Lol.
@Oentience
@Oentience 21 күн бұрын
Poor Sabine, what a brilliant woman, but as soon as Einstein is mentioned at the 6:15 min/sec mark we can all clearly see she's heavily internally prompted to take a drink of vodka to prepare her intellectual muscles. Great clip, thanks everyone.
@flyinghigh372
@flyinghigh372 21 күн бұрын
@ONEYEDPiRAT
@ONEYEDPiRAT 21 күн бұрын
If there's a black hole at the center of every Galaxy then it feeds all the suns in its Galaxy as the Suns give off their light and the black hole absorbs their light and feeds them sort of holding the Galaxy together what do ya think? A form of quantum entanglement?
@tubalcain1039
@tubalcain1039 20 күн бұрын
David Bohm had an alternative quantum mechanics,but it has no testable predictions.
@adaptivealph8052
@adaptivealph8052 20 күн бұрын
Look up Fang Chao Hoh
@gregoryhead382
@gregoryhead382 21 күн бұрын
My 1 inch equation is a TOE, 90909, with toes to c^, on the square for 22727 times 22726 equal to 4, please. It solves for G & N.., everything in quantum theory, uniting all the Newtonian, c Head c. Oh, on my family crest is a singularity, {C🎠C} for 0 energy.
@ONEYEDPiRAT
@ONEYEDPiRAT 21 күн бұрын
Simple right? In the beginning there was an idea, this idea created the mind, as the mind focused upon this idea it became self-aware and in that moment it says "oh! I know what to do!" and it was given all the time it needs to create this idea and that's what this is, and I'm hoping y'all don't mind? lol 1i .)
@dmahan8841
@dmahan8841 20 күн бұрын
We need a completely new theory of everything and i have it. Now how do i protect it. How do i connect my name to the theory? Im dead serious.
@MojiWord
@MojiWord 20 күн бұрын
If it's genuinely a Theory of Everything, you don't have to worry about any of these, it would know how to reveal itself alongside your name because *Transparency's sheerly & inherently ingrained within the context of Theory of Everything!*
@user-tu2rk6nu4z
@user-tu2rk6nu4z 21 күн бұрын
Three dimensions of ordinary space and some number of curved directions or "dimensions" possibly
@hyperduality2838
@hyperduality2838 19 күн бұрын
Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. All numbers fall within the complex plane. Real is dual to imaginary -- complex numbers are dual. All numbers are dual. The integers are self dual as they are their own conjugates. Categories (form, syntax, objects) are dual to sets (substance, semantics, subjective) -- category theory. Quantity is dual to quality. The tetrahedron is self dual -- just like the integers. The cube is dual to the octahedron. The dodecahedron is dual to the icosahedron -- the Platonic solids. Messages in a communication system are predicted into existence according to Shannon's information theorem -- a syntropic process, teleological. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Mind (syntropy) is dual to matter (entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line. All forms of communication require photons or the probability field of electro-magnetism and photons are dual. Waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality, pure energy is dual. Physical waves (real photons, syntax) are dual to probability (imaginary, semantics). "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@user-tu2rk6nu4z
@user-tu2rk6nu4z 21 күн бұрын
If we can understand the inner workings of a simulation then maybe we will be able to understand our own existence. The power came on and the simulation began
@mechanicsmathandphysics4692
@mechanicsmathandphysics4692 16 күн бұрын
It is weird how I don't seem to be able to comment on this video...
@Lord_Sub-Zero_johngiakalis1984
@Lord_Sub-Zero_johngiakalis1984 21 күн бұрын
Mr. DrBrianKeating, Nicely Sir, I love and support Mrs. Hossemfelder!!!
@juanferbriceno4411
@juanferbriceno4411 20 күн бұрын
I understand Sabine, Carlo and Brian discussing stuff... but why this guy Weinstein?
@andrewbouskill5444
@andrewbouskill5444 21 күн бұрын
This is to Mr. Weinstein-so gravity is the entanglement of our information moving forward in time with the information moving backward in time to be stored in a time/space ledger, if you will, or the 10th dimensional frame that describes our fourth dimensional locality?
@PearlmanYeC
@PearlmanYeC 21 күн бұрын
2:40 Pearlman YeC SPIRAL Black Hole illusion resolution' resolves. Those by galactic enters represent PAST not ongoing hyper density. that galaxy itself is wat used to be contained by it's center, SPI-RaL SPI = hyper dense proto galactic (Stelar) formation Preceded hyper cosmic 'Inflation' expansion. Start study at Researchgate. Follow, recommend and share to advance in/the science.
@vasa2681
@vasa2681 21 күн бұрын
With respect, i find this kind of posting old videos very annoying.
@semontreal6907
@semontreal6907 21 күн бұрын
Yes, you need a complete new cosmological theory. The Jwst findings show just how wrong the model is. It is time for you professionals to lead the way.
@justincase4812
@justincase4812 21 күн бұрын
True, as for the academics in denial, move on to a new layer in their careers. *Wink Wink* Dark matter pundits.
@michelangelope830
@michelangelope830 21 күн бұрын
I am going to give you the solution to all the problems and with the information you will do what you decide. To end Islam and the war you have to ask for proof that the Quran was memorized. Trust me. It is infinitely important and urgent the matter. Was the Quran memorized or not? I don't believe the Quran was memorized. Why did you believe the Quran was memorized? Try to memorize the first page, in any language, to have a taste of what would be required in time and effort to memorize the rest of the book. Was the Quran memorized and Allah is the true God? So much is at stake. I am a psychologist and person of many talents, not a charlatan looking for attention. I want to have a serious debate with you with humanity listening because if I debate with you and nobody else is present you win the debate. I need to call again the program to debate again if God exists and atheism is false. Who, what or how is this God for the moment it doesn't matter. We agreed from nothing can not be created something. I only debate with people who understand reality is eternal because from nothing can not be created something. Something always existed. I think that something that always existed is God and atheism is false. I failed and I need to keep trying to succeed. The true God is Spinoza's God. Spinoza is difficult to understand because it is impossible to understand infinitude and eternity. God is impossible to understand because it created the universe after existing forever. It's a fact, it's logical, it's reality, it's rational. Either the universe is eternal or God is eternal. Either what has a beginning of existence is eternal or what created what has a beginning of existence is eternal. What makes sense? What is impossible and what is necessary? What do you want? I want to end religion and atheism with knowledge being rational. The truth is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. Time is running out and is eternal. Thank you.
@TheSandkastenverbot
@TheSandkastenverbot 20 күн бұрын
Why does everyone invite this hedge fund manager (Eric Weinstein) to discussions about TOE's?
@morphixnm
@morphixnm 20 күн бұрын
Do we need a theory of everything? If it does not include the "paranormal" and all those real but "anomalous" things between and beyond Heaven and Earth, then it will only be a theory of everything these people already believe.
@TheSandkastenverbot
@TheSandkastenverbot 20 күн бұрын
1) Study how science works, especially the part about DISPROVING current theories. Your comment shows you are not aware of that 2) Study the history of research into paranormal phenomena. These phenomena have been studied by several research teams, e.g. during the cold war. There's a reason why interest has slowed down.
@morphixnm
@morphixnm 20 күн бұрын
@@TheSandkastenverbot Theories are not disproven, they are either improved or replaced. And you obviously have not kept up at all with research because you are referencing what was done many decades ago.
@hyperduality2838
@hyperduality2838 19 күн бұрын
Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages or communication. If mathematics is a language then it is dual. All numbers fall within the complex plane. Real is dual to imaginary -- complex numbers are dual. All numbers are dual. The integers are self dual as they are their own conjugates. Categories (form, syntax, objects) are dual to sets (substance, semantics, subjective) -- category theory. Quantity is dual to quality. The tetrahedron is self dual -- just like the integers. The cube is dual to the octahedron. The dodecahedron is dual to the icosahedron -- the Platonic solids. Messages in a communication system are predicted into existence according to Shannon's information theorem -- a syntropic process, teleological. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Mind (syntropy) is dual to matter (entropy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line. All forms of communication require photons or the probability field of electro-magnetism and photons are dual. Waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality, pure energy is dual. Physical waves (real photons, syntax) are dual to probability (imaginary, semantics). "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@richardmarcus3340
@richardmarcus3340 20 күн бұрын
You need to trash your junk theories to see the simple fix to our current best theory of the universe. Then you'll understand everything.
@briankeating3365
@briankeating3365 21 күн бұрын
Eric Weinstein: THIS Is the Biggest Problem in Modern Society!
11:38
Dr Brian Keating
Рет қаралды 12 М.
Is it particle physics or a fairytale? PART 1 | Sabine Hossenfelder, Gavin Salam, Bjørn Ekeberg
23:09
Как быстро замутить ЭлектроСамокат
00:59
ЖЕЛЕЗНЫЙ КОРОЛЬ
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Ну Лилит))) прода в онк: завидные котики
00:51
Backstage 🤫 tutorial #elsarca #tiktok
00:13
Elsa Arca
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Einstein’s Other Theory of Everything
13:20
Sabine Hossenfelder
Рет қаралды 335 М.
Where is physics going? | Sabine Hossenfelder, Bjørn Ekeberg and Sam Henry
46:51
The Institute of Art and Ideas
Рет қаралды 193 М.
Can Particles be Quantum Entangled Across Time?
35:19
World Science Festival
Рет қаралды 185 М.
Do we need a Theory of Everything?
8:51
Sabine Hossenfelder
Рет қаралды 284 М.
Carlo Rovelli and Brian Greene on Black Holes and White Holes
31:58
World Science Festival
Рет қаралды 95 М.
The String Theory Wars and What Happened Next
25:18
Sabine Hossenfelder
Рет қаралды 679 М.
Mi primera placa con dios
0:12
Eyal mewing
Рет қаралды 576 М.
Xiaomi Note 13 Pro по безумной цене в России
0:43
Простые Технологии
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН
Задача APPLE сделать iPHONE НЕРЕМОНТОПРИГОДНЫМ
0:57
Очень странные дела PS 4 Pro
1:00
ТЕХНОБЛОГ ГУБАРЕВ СЕРГЕЙ
Рет қаралды 422 М.
Выложил СВОЙ АЙФОН НА АВИТО #shorts
0:42
Дмитрий Левандовский
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН