In this brief video we cover what is commonly called "The Kalam" argument for the existence of God. This argument takes for its starting point the creation of the universe and then works backward to the Divine Attributes.
Пікірлер: 15
@thinkcatholic.Ай бұрын
For more evidence for the existence of God see, "Does God Exist? 4 Proofs for God & The Response to Richard Dawkins" on the Think Catholic page.
@radrooferАй бұрын
When the little horn of Daniel vatican rewrote the kjv 60 years ago they changed the name of our Father Yehovah to God meaning ba'al and they changed the name of our Messiah Yeshua Ha'Mashia to the vatican nickname Jesus Christ. I spit on your God because I do not worship Ba'al I pray to Father Yehovah through His Awesome Mighty and Worthy Son Yeshua Ha'Mashia and almost every one of my prays are answered
@samael5782Ай бұрын
He talks about proof and then brings the Kalam cosmological argument. 🤦♂
@mountain6677Ай бұрын
Just because you use more complex words doesn’t make what you say any more convincing. There is no proof of god as I’ll continue to think until I see some shit with my own eyes which won’t happen. It’s all delusions in my eyes
@FeliciaByNatureАй бұрын
The kalam has many problems with its fundamental assumptions, but one thing I've never seen addressed is this: You call god timeless "or eternal" - but that qualification makes no sense. If something is timeless it is NOT eternal. It is *without the property of time*. That is not eternal. Eternity encompasses all of time. It is the exact opposite of "timelessness" (whatever that means, it's a concept so absolutely foreign to the human mind that even discussing such a proposition is ludicrous.) Your god is therefore both without time, and all encompassing of time? Your god is a contradiction.
@thinkcatholic.Ай бұрын
Time is a measure of change. God does not change, this is what it means for him to be”outside time.”
@immanuelbasker1970Ай бұрын
You call it god and I call it nothing.. it's all the same shit bro.
@ChriskaynАй бұрын
This is the argument of atheist, nothing created nothing, which it doesnt make any sense right? you actually need to have more faith in that argument that god itself to believe it, the simple answer is something created the universe, that something must be outside the laws of the universe and also a purpose and intelligence, the atheist argument saying "nothing created nothing" is childlish and less cientific, is just sad
@barts5964Ай бұрын
@@Chriskayn How do you know it has to be a purpose and intelligence? How do you know there was nothing before the universe?
@ChriskaynАй бұрын
@@barts5964 we know there was nothing because when you trace back the expansion of the universe, mathematically is what you come with, this is proven and is not a discussion like all the major scientist even stephen hawkins aknowledge this, the question is what created the singularity, how did it happen, well it had to be something outside of matter, space and time because these 3 cant exist with the other, again mathametically proven. Intelligence and with purpose because the universe has patterns of proof that requires intelligence to be made, like the exact pace the universe is expanding, the DNA and Codes we have, the exact numbers that we can find in atoms and other combinations of things that cant exist without exact precision. Precision in which would be possible in an universe where Entropy is the rule of things, Entropy could never made these combination of things, let alone intelligent life. Theres a lot of proof for it, and the biggest argument for me, is the counter argument of atheist that say "Nothing created Nothing" Like it all magically appeared, which honestly it takes MORE FAITH and is more incredible to aknowledge than something outside of the universe laws, created it
@ChriskaynАй бұрын
@@barts5964 we know there was nothing because when you trace back the expansion of the universe, mathematically is what you come with, this is proven and is not a discussion like all the major scientist even stephen hawkins aknowledge this, the question is what created the singularity, how did it happen, well it had to be something outside of matter, space and time because these 3 cant exist with the other, again mathametically proven. Intelligence and with purpose because the universe has patterns of proof that requires intelligence to be made, like the exact pace the universe is expanding, the DNA and Codes we have, the exact numbers that we can find in atoms and other combinations of things that cant exist without exact precision. Precision in which wouldnt be possible in an universe where Entropy is the rule of things, Entropy could never made these combination of things, let alone intelligent life. Theres a lot of proof for it, and the biggest argument for me, is the counter argument of atheist that say "Nothing created Nothing" Like it all magically appeared, which honestly it takes MORE FAITH and is more incredible to aknowledge than something outside of the universe laws, created it
@barts5964Ай бұрын
@@Chriskayn So when they say there was nothing before the big bang, they don't mean an absence of everything but it is more complicated than that. It is something outside of matter space and time, they say that is probably true. We just don't know what else it could be, because we don't live outside space, time and matter. There's no way of finding out what was before the singularity because it is too complicated. There are many theories though, and they are bases in mathematics. The numbers you talk about and the precision, how do they lead to intelligence and purpose? I don't understand how you make that jump. Read some work of Jeremy England on Entropy I think its pretty interesting. He makes the claim that entropy could lead to Life and Life and intelligence are not contradictory to entropy as some might believe. There is some science behind it. I'm not saying it is true, you can decide for yourself, I'm no scientist and I don't think you are, there is no reason in fighting about such complicated stuff. Just pointing out it might not be this simple. When it comes to what atheists say, I am not speaking in the name of atheists, I'm saying we don't know what was before that. You can't say there is a god because another explanation requires faith, when yours does it to. Also, how does nothing require more faith than a God that has so many characteristic as the Christian god? I assume You are a Christian, maybe I'm wrong.