First

short version: there is no expectation of privacy in a public place. A private individual acting in a private capacity does not engage GPDR.

We ended up exchanging this model for the slimmer version kzfaq.infoUgkx0jZ_lGlDVJhDnmagEU8gn47cmfPNlLQU because it was too wide for the only door trim area that made sense to mount it on. However, we should have just noted the dimensions prior to purchasing. Otherwise, we love the doorbell. It works perfectly, and the video is very clear, even at night.

I had an experience where an annoying neighbour had taken to filming my private property and vehicle etc for purposes to provoke. Having spoken with the Police they advised it's not illegal and not to react but advised that I was entitled to do the same to his house. I asked having pointed out that he has 2 teenage daughters at home and how long would it take for you to arrest me after he complains? The Officer was silent then replied fair point, I'm sorry for your situation and that was that. These laws can be abused and are not balanced as always in the UK

I have harassed by me neighbours for years and with all their cameras. I have had the police and the ICO they didn’t won’t to know! I asked if I can put cameras up to protect my family the ICO said as long as the cameras are not looking into back gardens it was okay the police said it was okay to protect my family. I have sent the cctv to the police of verbal abuse and their car being driven at me and my wife what the police have said to the neighbours ? We have had 5 years of this from the neighbours 😢

Living in a small rural village where we've had a lot of things stolen by a certain "community" most of us have CCTV that watches over our own and each others' gardens. It's proved to be a real asset. One of my cameras overlooks the neighbour's back yard but since it covers his shed where he keeps his motorcycle and tools he's fine with this. He dropped me an SMS one day and asked for footage from a certain time - of course I downloaded it and sent it to him on Whatsapp ..... it was him and a bunch of his mates mooning at the camera after spending the afternoon in the pub watching the rugby. I'm not sure what laws this broke but it gave everyone a good laugh 🙂

It amazes me how quickly the Police are knocking on peoples doors who've got a CCTV camera on show in the hope that they've captured a recent criminal activity in the area.! ;-)

My neighbour was spying and recording my house, we could see the cameras in his house pointing at our house and kids. The police said we can’t do anything about it unless he admits he’s covertly using cameras. They even spoke to him. The laws all well and good if and when it works. Everybody should prepare to defend themselves and not leave it to the police.

Police came round the other week wanting the cctv from our home of a person walking down the street. They had no issues and the footage was very helpful.

I live on a boat in a port on a canal in France. About 4 years ago, a couple of private boats were broken into and possessions stolen. The port has a CCTV camera and the nextdoor restaurant also has one. The burglars were caught on video and were easily identifiable. However, as there were no signs informing the public that CCTV was installed, the footage could not be used by the police. The port is part of of a government-owned entity and leased to a private company but it is still considered public property.

Thank you. This is very timely. I live on the first floor of a four flat council block. A ground floor tenant has fitted one of these camera doorbells in the middle of her door. There is no way for the neighbour on my floor, myself or any visitors to our homes to leave or enter the property without being recorded as the door with the camera is next to the bottom of the stairs. How is this not a breach of our privacy? The neighbour with the camera is an awful person and I don't want her recording me. For the record, I would have no issues with the council installing a cctv system. I just object that this woman is able to harass me and my neighbour in this way. Thank you for all your knowledge and help in explaining the law.

I put a window mounted bird feeder up on my office window. I was thinking about setting up a motion capture style "Wildlife camera" eventually using a Sony A6100. However, the moment I put the bird feeder on the window I knew the only way I would be auto capturing it was from inside the window, because otherwise the camera would be pointed into my neighbours garden... from above. I just wasn't about to do that. I had to find another location to try and same that just has my own garden in shot.

So, are individuals subject to GDPR? Yes. Does it mean you CANNOT film people? No. So long as you comply with GDPR rules, you can film them. GDPR does NOT mean you CANNOT film. You can.

Hi BBB, I was out shopping in Asda’s and they have the standard cameras by the self service checkouts, however one of the cameras had frozen with a previous customers face and bank card details on. These were just about visible; I asked the staff member if they were going to turn the frozen screen off, but they didn’t understand why I was concerned that every customer using that self service till could clearly see the customer and their bank card. I gave up trying to explain why this could be a problem. What are your thoughts on these cameras and their use. It may make an interesting video.

The section of the ICO website included the following paragraph: "There is a limited amount of action the ICO can take after this point to make the person comply. It is highly unlikely the ICO will consider it fair or balanced to take enforcement action against a domestic CCTV user" Basically they are saying that they won't (possibly even can't?) take any meaningful action against a domestic camera owner so presumably any action would be civil rather than criminal. That being the case, if the stereotypes are to be believed, would put it more in the realm of who has the most competent legal team (or deepest pockets) rather than strictly to who is in the right.

Is BBC asking everybody for permission when filming on the street?

information from ICO Domestic CCTV systems The use of recording equipment, such as CCTV or smart door bells, to capture video or sound recordings outside the user’s property boundary is not a breach of data protection law. People should try to point their CCTV cameras away from their neighbours’ homes and gardens, shared spaces or public streets. But this is not always possible. When people capture images and audio recordings outside of their property boundary, they should consider how intrusive this activity is. They should consider whether they can point their cameras elsewhere or, if possible apply filters or privacy blocks. In these circumstances, data protection law also requires them to follow certain rules - although these are difficult to enforce.

I have a neighbor that has a cctv camera on the outside of his fence to film the path and woods outside his garden. I spoke to the police and they just told me to file a complaint with the ICO. I then read that page you were on, and you missed probably the most important two paragraphs there: "You can complain to us when a user of domestic CCTV doesn't follow the rules. We can send a letter asking them to resolve things, eg put up appropriate signage or respond to data protection requests. There is a limited amount of action the ICO can take after this point to make the person comply. It is highly unlikely the ICO will consider it fair or balanced to take enforcement action against a domestic CCTV user. " What is the use of having these laws when the only penalty for breaking them is a strongly worded letter? That is no deterrent at all.

As I understand it for taxi/private hire vehicles, they should only have video on for dashcams and therefore don't need to pay the £40 per year to ICO. IF the driver wants to record audio and/or wants internal video and/or audio they MUST inform ICO and register. How many Ubers or Taxis have you been in where they are recording audio via their dashcam? They shouldn't be if they haven't registered. Fairly certain on this one.

@BlackBeltBarrister would you consider a video to address whether or even if recordings of a neighbour's activities becomes a case of harassment, please?

You can change the range on the ring doorbell. Mines restricted to my gate about 20ft. Unless someone enters my gate ie postman it doesn't record

I have a neighbour with a ring camera that points in through our front window, I have asked them to relocate the camera so that it's not looking in to our hose, you can actually see us inside our living room (she's shown us), I spoke to ICO and the reply was "there's nothing we can do, you need to raise it with ring", I kid you not, she's even admitted she knows she shouldn't be recording people outside her boundary (audio and video), I spoke to ring to ask for details of their GDPR department and they just kept pointing me back at their terms and conditions....I'm not a customer! nobody seems to know what to do with this, in fact ring kept saying "it's not stored by ring, it's in the cloud" yep, the cloud owned and operated by ring, an hour of trying to get anywhere on the phone with them was totally wasted. so apparently it's not a gdpr breach to record audio and video of someone INSIDE their own property by someone that even admits they know they shouldn't :/

What about the companies that are storing the data, as in the case of the ring doorbell the footage is stored by ring, or Amazon, I'm not sure which one actually stores that information but are they obliged to provide the footage to people as they are holding the data, even though it was caught by a homeowner?

GDPR is Legislation which mainly applies to corporations

ICO contacted me a few years ago because I'm self-employed and I have signage on my van; I have to register my dash cam with them. Which I did and still do. I ask them about my doorbell and video cameras for the drive as this is a registered office for a charity that has a limited company section. They said no because it's still a residential property, don't need to register doorbell or cameras on the drive.

Interesting. I wasn’t sure on the laws about house cameras. My sin is a drummer in a band, don’t worry, he only practices at home during times that have been agreed with my neighbours and he used damper pads. But to get his kit to the car parked in the road in front of my drive, it takes about 3-4 trips minimum. The same on his return after pub closing times. My neighbour complained about this and asked that he not bring his kit in at night, that he leaves it visible in the car parked on the road, because his trips from the car to the door and back kept setting off her doorbell camera, which obviously alerts them each time. We live in the two houses at the end of a very small, dead end road of 18 houses. We are a small road off a small road off a small road x 6. She claims she can’t adjust the distance it’s set at because her and her husband feel safer being able to see who’s walking around that close to the house. Despite no crime in our area in the 20 years we have lived there, they moved in a month before me, and they are in their early 50’s. The same as me. So when their camera goes off, they have a clear view of every front garden all the way down the road & every time myself or a visitor enters or leaves my house or approaches, it sets their camera off. So I’m guessing that legally I kind of have the right to tell them we will come and go as often and as late as we want, as long as we aren’t causing a public noise nuisance?And that I can reasonably ask her to minimise the settings of her camera so it isn’t intruding on my privacy or recording my movements on my property or the public path & roadway? Good to know. Now, what about the two feuding neighbours who live opposite and have cameras above their second floor windows that record everything and everyone in their front gardens and on the road and look over each other’s garden gates and into each other’s front bedroom windows??? Honestly, they are both idiots and I politely how to each of their houses when I’m walking down the road. Lol.

Also, in our road we have a house who's front door faces along the road and the owner had a camera on the door recording all that happens in the road. This person also parks his vehicle on the pavement in front of his neighbours house and says he has a right to do so. His camera records this vehicle and anything that happens on the pavement in front of his neighbours property and the road. Is this right and is there anything that can be done to stop it? He has already told me I'm passive-aggressive when I positions traffic cones on the kerb to stop him parking there!!

Having had a CCTV licence it's pretty complicated. I've noticed a few private fixed cctv cameras in public areas which have nothing to do with the protection of their properties. It's a grey area for people knowing what they can or shouldn't do. It's always worth asking first

What about these shops, big stores etc who have their cctv on their outer walls? They are capturing everyone who walks past the store I know because I worked for a well known large store. These cameras were the best money could buy, high definition, all the bells and whistles Why were they not told to take their cctv down or why were they not taken to court? Hey,, if they ban any sort of public photography, they had better ban, country wide, all cctv as well. There cannot be one law for one and another for a corporation.

What if you have a court order in place for your neighbor stop recording your garden, your child and stop recording audio, then you find she has posted her CCTV on Facebook clearly showing over your fence and your child's trampoline with clear audio on the video?

Modern CCTV cameras are able to mask areas like neighbour’s gardens, you can literally draw a line along that imaginary fence you described, to ensure everything to one side is masked.

I didn't think there was a law stopping you photographing and/or filming someone in a public place.

How do we stand over delivery couriers insisting on photographing you and your house for 'proof of delivery' purposes?

Maybe the question should be 'do I care about data protection laws?' Just watch any news channel outside broadcast.

I’ve made an arrangement with my neighbour who has a doorbell camera. I won’t complain about it if you let me see video if any anti social behaviour or criminal activity such as car theft/ break ins happen in the street.

The neighbour has a Ring doorbell pointed directly at my property - other side of a cul-de-sac. This could be / should be angled so that it is not directly facing my property. The LCO/Police, as usual, won't do anything and said it is up to me to lodge a complaint to the ICO. However previously when I updated one of my CCTV cameras from analogue to digital, the neighbour complained and the LCO/Police came to my door. This was during the Scaredemic and in request to the LCO/Police to come in I said no - they immediately said they were going to report me to the ICO. I said I can easily just take a mobile phone image of my CCTV images. The LCO/Police was very disappointed at my obvious suggestion and agreed. Apparently the neighbour said they saw a green light come on as they moved on their drive and thus automatically assumed I was capturing them on CCTV. Not much of a security system when it 'announces' when it is capturing images. What was occurring was that the digital CCTV was using Ethernet and a in-line led was just indicating when there was a link between the camera and my Laptop (similar to led's on Routers indication the status of links between equipment - thus depending on where you were on the drive whether the led was 'hidden' behind the camera or not!!. The LCO/Police told the neighbour I was not monitoring their property and the neighbour were suitably red-faced about the issue. Why did the LCO/Police visit me but not the neighbour?

How about a follow up on how to issue and respond to a data subject request? Would you really have to watch all of the footage from the camera to find out if the subject's image had been captured?

If a householder has cctv covering the front of their property (but, in order to cover the path and steps, a small area of the pavement outside the garden is also covered), is it necessary to erect a sign to advise that cctv is in use?

Why does the DWP jobcentres claim that a you breach gdpr when you record them breaching it ?

Someone on my street has a Tesla which doesn’t fit fully on their driveway and overhangs half the pavement. Every time anyone walks past (walking on the pavement) the headlights do that double flash to indicate a clip has been saved as you were too close to the car. I’m not sure if audio is recorded, but is this reasonable? Bearing in mind the pedestrian is on the public footpath. They must be recording hundreds of clips a day.

"better off reporting it to the police" report what? That they don't have a bobby parked outside my property 24/7 to observe crime? The only time to act is to put up a camera before the crime, you can't put a seatbelt on after you've had a car crash.

The law wants it both ways, they don't want these cameras seeing passers by until there's a crime then they praise these cameras. These cameras have been instrumental in so many cases and many cases have collapsed for lack of evidence that such doorbell cameras would have captured. There can be no expectation of privacy walking down the pavement of a public road. The privacy of INSIDE your home cannot extend once you leave OUTSIDE your home.

Thanks Dan

Very interesting. So if the police ask for dashcam or doorbell footage, that would no longer be considered as, "wholly personal or household use," and must therefore be blurred before being sent to the police. Thank you for clarifying this legal point.

My neighbour is a well known drug dealer and user. He is aggressive to the point of even attacking his own friends with a makeshift weapon, screaming and shouting while walking up and down the street etc. I've had run ins with him during 2020 when he stole my bins and said I'd stolen them from him, etc etc. We are both social tenants, but in September/october 2021, he decided to put up static cameras outside his door, one facing to the front of the path and the other in the opposite direction. I assume this is because he was having some trouble with other drug dealers, (coming to his door and making threats etc). However, they're is a grass area between our doors. We are both downstairs flats with our doors facing the same way across this grassy area. There is a fence down the middle, (not that that helps, because he STILL walks up and down my side past my door whenever he pleases). But I have left my house before and walked down my path to the front of the flats to the communal garden area, and he's come to his door and stood there for about 10 seconds, before saying, "I was wondering who was outside, you set my cameras off". I simply said, yeah? I sometimes walk up and down here whenever I want, and left it hanging. I don't believe his camera should be covering my door, or my path or side garden past the line of the fence. I'm just wondering, how do I get him to move the cameras, and not film me coming and going out of my own home? It's not a case of ask him, because he's not the type of person I want to talk to or interact with.

This video is a treasure for those who have their eyes on the piano gate incident that happened 10 days ago at St. Pancras station. Please do an analysis of that particular case. Your opinion is much expected and appreciated. Just a discussion of legal matters, leave out the politics.

I have kangaroo doorbell cam it doesn't record audio and only takes a small few seconds of 3 to 4 quick pictures in conssesion to make a brief video clip that sends straight to ur phone but only if ppl get close to the door or pressing the doorbell, never records anything else it has sensor settings incase ur garden is bit longer, I love it never answer to salesmen ever again

How do Google maps and apple get away with publishing pictures of people that they've captured from their street view cars then?

Thought had put sign up if capturing general public or shared space , if recording they have a right to view it but yes can't keep footage for years and years

Daniel, surely Auditors are carrying out commercial activity as they benefit from revenue from their You Tube channel so they are required to be registered with the ICO? Thank you Keith

I had issues with Anti Social neighbours - pointing CCTV at my house and using it as a point of intimidation due to an unrelated border disagreement - I caught her on my dashcam committing a hate crime by making disability mocking gestures towards me - she earned an entire day in the police station and I was offered a prosecution of her - a very satisfying outcome to one of these kind of issues, she's been a lot better behaved since the police fell upon her.

what about communal gardens? because my neighbor's are always knocking my back windows too see if I'm in, I've had more than 10x break in attempts in the past year! the police dont do anything when they do this or even when they try starting on me for saying i got them on cam. i know the obvious answer is too move out, but thats takin longer than my head might b able too handle lol

surely if people are in public they dont have a right to privacy

curtis media channel was explaining cops have to legally give you their bodycam footage

I have CCTV, no sound and I can see alot out of my property,A young man set fire to a house down my street,I was returning to my house after doing shopping & noticed the smoke comming from the house.I whatched my CCTV footage and logged the time it started and who was leaving that house.The fire brigade were on site dealing with said fire,the police arrived too, but the amount of traffic parked on my street made the police park near my house.I went to the police and told them I have evidence of that fire,she came to look at the CCTV footage and she got a good look at the male clothing,face etc,she left going back to the car but she went around the block and parked up close to that house fire,unknown to her she had done the right move because that male came back to look at that house fire he set alight too and the policewoman notices him by my CCTV footage,she tried to arrest him but started coming back towards my house but another police car was parked up with the officers out of the car,that policewoman shouted at those police men to arrest that male coming towards you,they arrest him,he was charged,I found out the that the young man took his own life having probibly found out what the sentance was goig to be.So CCTV has it's purpose.I still get the police comming to my house on a suspicious nature children being maybe watched by car drives who park up in stupid places as if they are waiting for something which can be drugs of all kinds or something else not related to nothing but a phone call.Our eyes are Like CCTV but CCTV can play back the happenings our brain cannot.we have police camera at the top of another road watching events unfold and is able to see greater distances than mine because it's very high.The public can use a video camera to record what our eyes can see too but it stored and can be helpful should someone loose contact with a child.The benifits of CCTV far outway the losses and those people who come up with stupid laws made for one style of recording and another is not illegal yet both go hand in hand,the only diffence is one is statioary the other can move I say we do not have enough watching items to reduce crime etc.Todays police who are called to a disturbance want CCTV footage and are not bothered about legality but getting results quickly.

Thank you Barrister...

Why is it not legal for people to photograph and film people (including cctv and doorbell cameras) on their private property but legal for drone operators to do the same? Sounds a bit like one rule for me but not for thee. I can understand dashcams. They have a specific purpose. The main purpose of drones is hobby and entertainment. Imagine the following scenario. It's a lovely hot summer day and you, well within your rights, allow your children to play in your private garden, maybe in a paddling pool without clothes on. Now there's a drone nearby recording your children. Surely that falls into "making indecent images of children" territory.

So the police should not be asking for doorbell footage, as that could be aiding and abetting in a possible crime

A while back, you analysed the video that Ashley Neal was being sued for... where the work van swerved towards a cyclist. If I remember correctly, the driver claimed something like an "invasion of privacy", and the consensus seemed to be that there can be no expected right to privacy if you're out in public. How does that work alongside the GDPR? I fully understand that if you have CCTV covering your garden, you can't record next door's garden as well, as it's private property. But if you have a Ring doorbell recording the path to your door and a _public_ footpath, how is that covered by GDPR? Similarly, if I fly my drone around my garden recording video and it captures faces of people on the _public_ footpath out the back, and I then put the video on KZfaq, where would I stand?

Hi BB, how do we stand with data protection regarding self service check out tills, where a camera is continuously records your image during the transaction, can I make a data subject access request of the recorded image captured by the self service till from the supermarket or vendor

What about a blink camera on flats facing my property no way to find which flat it belongs to?

I was at a court case of an injured man, the other parties insurer sent out a spy to capture film of the guy working because he pretended to be disabled, he captured film of everything except when he was in his house, he never filmed the front of his house ever.

You say about the door video so why do police ask if you have any videos of joe blogs stealing a car they would like to know 🇬🇧

But surely filming from your doorbell into the street is filming into a public space and we were always led to believe there is no privacy in public?

My house the front door goes straight on to public path, i have two cameras covering the whole street. the houses directly to side of me you cannot not see in to there home, or houses across road you can not see through windows, but no one can be missed leaving or entering on to public ground. we had cars vandalized and even a hit and run two days in a row to next door, he was happy for the cctv for sure after that. plus my dashcams run 24/7 two of them so every angle covered. having them sure reduces crime near house, park just up road it common to get damage. the cctv saves up to a month, and dashcam footage gets wiped over approx every 25 hours so if something happens they got that time before its gone, but unlucky if the hdd gets format as every now and again it will. but if its some i do not like, footage will go missing

Would love to hear about legal issues related to noisy neighbours- children jumpy upstairs etc.

surely using footage on youtube would be even less domestic use / personal and household exemption than on facebook. if a video is on youtube any monetised or sponsored then clearly it is being used to generate an income and should be classed as business / professional use. shouldnt identifyable details like vehicle registrations need removing/bluring out before use?

You said, "It could well be, well it might, it wouldn't surprise me, it's possible, the court could, if, they could, or maybe, don't be surprised if"........ I didn't learn a thing from your conversation.

How does GDPR work in regard to the DVLA selling my details to private parking companies ???

my front door is on a fairly busy street at least during the summer as i live on the coast, i have just found out that the homeless guy sleeping in the shop doorway next to me is using my front doorway as a toilet when he needs to urinate, could i install a video doorbell to capture that so that i could if necessary have him removed (I hasten to add that i have no problem with him sleeping in my landlords shop doorway) but my door has a small step down into my front hallway so therefore could be deemed as a health hazard if it is shown that he is indeed using my doorway as a toilet.

I think there should be limits to auditor and they should be looked into as it out of control of legislation by now having regulation to monitor it

The Data Protection Act is a pain in the arse. I lost contact with a lady moved from one care home to another because of it, and it's caused a huge workload for the police and security firms, concerning rules and storage.

The act of filming and recording is different to the act of publication. The former can always be done and never needs permission. The later can require permission depending of the context and method of publication.

What about supermarket’s then, their filming at self service tills now?

As far as I understand, the ICO does not state that the data protection laws are explicitly aimed towards business. Thus they effect every one and not just businesses.

My door bell is constantly operating but not recording. It only records when a person enters my drive and walks to my front door. People walking on the pavement past my home are not recorded. However if I am watching the happenings in real time but again not recording will these events be subject to the data protection act?

They can film us.. we can't film them.. hardly fair

So what if you take footage within the bounds of your curtilage but share it with someone in the pub ? Outside of private use , surely ?

Hi, i have CCTV to front off the house, 2 cameras, we dont have a drive, just a public pavement, which catches two angles walking down the street from both sides, to my front door. i also have 2 cameras on the back where i have a garden and it captures my garden patio area as well as the neighbours, the neighbour has given consent as we live in cul de sac, and he has dogs, the the protection helps him also, how do i stand

Is there a different set of rules regarding business CCTV cameras pointing directly at residential properties?

What if you fly your drone over your neighbourhood and people are in there gardens,but your at a height that you can't make out there faces,is this a privacy concern and can you get into trouble for it ?

One question I've not seen addressed here or anywhere else is this one. What about houses which have dummy cameras which are so realistic that members of the public request footage ? How can this situation be dealt with, especially as the whole point of such cameras is the deterrent value, without admitting they're basically fake ?

We allow CCTV to be used by the high street surveillance systems,some are fixed some are motorised,one law for one one different law for another.the solution is get rid of the stupid laws.

Hi I regularly watch your KZfaq channel. Would you consider posting a Ring Door bell classification when it is fitted in a communal area of a private flat complex as the two you've posted don't appear to cover such a situation. My neighbour's front door is at the top of a communal stairwell also serving a second flat (my mate). The Ring Doorbell is fitted in the communal area walkway/Car Park and isn't the RD owner's property. The Ring Doorbell owner doesn't own the outside door or the internal door as I had to get permission from the Freeholder to change for a Oak internal door last year. All had to be approved etc Fire Door for example. The second flat though is my mate and I regularly visit him. Hence I am captured every time I visit, furthermore we often speak on the walkway outside where the Ring Doorbell is installed and thus the other neighbour can listen/store private conversations.

Hi BBB could you do a video on the legalities if restricting drone flights with Public Space Protection Orders please?

I don't care if I'm breaking the law. The world's gone stark raving mad.

Hi, what about body worn cameras by workers in public spaces and inside your own personal property with out permission

I do have an issue with drones. While I know that a drone can legally fly over my property and film, it does feel like an invasion of privacy. I could put physical barriers in place to protect my privacy from an individual in a public space, but they could put a drone up and film anyway. But would someone standing on a high step-ladder to film over a high wall be considered in the same way? Why isn’t the privacy laws protecting my privacy from all invasions?

What about if it is for your security, fear of the safety of life, say you have been abducted a few times interrogation on all you know to hear and done,, Now have mental health problems,, been for Counselling , heard the problem,but can't help,, can't go to Police,warned family will get hurt,,. Any ideas. .

What about the external domestic use of faux cameras which have been put up as a crime deterrent?

Sounds like Cycling Mikey is lucky he's in the UK 🤣

So regarding drone footage ...this contradicts what you said that if you are loading video up to KZfaq as a business then you are a citizen journalist and GDPR will not apply ?? Which is the correct information

My camera captured the audio of a neighbour getting a very severe beating (he ended up in hospital) and pics of his attackers before and after the event. Do I keep it for the police or destroy it for his attackers' privacy?

BBB What about cameras opposite a school recording a car parked on the highway where they park

Very surprised you publish on TikTok. You may reach an audience there, but those people cant read, let alone reason.

My door and therefore the camera doorbell is on the side of my property it’s range goes across my drive and to my neighbours front door. I told them and their response was yippe! More security. In actual fact ir only takes footage of anyone passing my porch or pressing the bell to activate it. Do the rules change if I have their permission?

I can't help but stare at those two things on the wall on the left. They're not illegal Samurai Swords are they?

What about getting videoed in tesco when paying for food.

I have just joined walking group. Was handed form to complete. Contains request for date of birth ( and other contact details which I don't have a problem with) and 12 questions on health. This is just for a walk in local park. At top of form it says it is a key requirement of our funding contract (it is a Trust) is all participants must complete this form. Do you think that this is against GDPR regulations?

Can you please help me, My Landlord has started installing CCTV around our estate, does he under GDPR regulations have to also put up signs informing he has. They are just visual only.