aint gonna happen to any useful degree within the next 100 years

Except that Jesus spoke everything into existence in 6 days roughly 6,000 years ago.

@@statutesofthelord The new restored Earth and modern man yes. However, the age of Earth as a planet is probably much older than that. Maybe a lot has happened between Genesis 1:1 and the next line Genesis 1:2. We are still learning.......

@@fernandoben5605 fernando, Exodus 20:8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. 9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: 10 But the seventh day [is] the sabbath of the LORD thy God: [in it] thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that [is] within thy gates: 11 For [in] six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them [is], and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. The next 7th day Sabbath starts at sundown on April 26, 2024. If you love Jesus, you will keep his commandments. Please do so.

It's sad that thus man claiming to be a Christian propagandizes the "SCIENTIFIC" mantra of billions of years when the bible makes crystal clear that our BEGINNING was a mere 6,000 years by the biblical timeline. Make the most of mocking God in this short life we all get. But don't forget eternity is FOR EVER. I love the nick name Kent Hovind gives this man. It fits well. Hugh loss.!!!!!!!!

@@alanmcnaughton3628You side with Kent Hovind’s ad hominem over the calm arguments of someone who says humans have only been around for 9,000 or less years? I see what the bible meant about useless bickering.

Jesus spoke this world and everything in it into existence in 6 days, and rested the 7th. That was approximately 6,000 years ago.

@@statutesofthelordNobody can explain God. It's not possible. That is why he sent his son the Lord Jesus to tell us how to live, and repent or sins in his name, so we may enter Gods kingdom, ✝️🙄

Dinosaur is a term created in the 1800’s. The terms in the Bible are behemoth and leviathan. Dinosaurs didn’t die out 65 million years ago. They lived at the same time as humans. There are early drawings in South America showing humans riding on the backs of what appear to be a brontosaurus. Plus, a painting from the medieval times showing people riding on them as well. The term they used back then was dragons.

@@allenpayton1 if I try to explain this with links to the overlapping footprints, zapped goes my comment just like magic

You will like the antichrist

I think you mean Nobel Prize or maybe not as there is no Nobel Prize for religion it's super natural and can not be proven

@truthgiver8286 that's right, origins is supernatural and the human practice of science doesn't go there, but heretic Hugh Ross insists on mixing naturalism with Genesis. He most likely ends up in hell for leading many people away from reliance on what God has declared, instead of whimsical human opinions about the past (which all involve extrapolation based arguments)

@@truthgiver8286 Ross has already proven the existence of God. RTB have a scientific Biblical model of creation that is testable, falsifiable and predictive of future scientific discovery just as every scientific model must..

@@SamytheGreek Oh wow! Tell me please how do you scientifically prove the supernatural. There is nothing testable.

You make a valid point, but I believe Ross is speaking of domesticated Ostriches not the wild ones. I imagine there's quite a difference. A cucumber, once brined canned, and aged, is no longer a cucumber; it's a pickle.

Yes. Bring up the topic of politics!

You don't need to be a scientist to understand the Bible. Men Like Hugh Ross is what makes it confusing. Believe the Bible not Mr. Ross.

God used physics to create this universe, not magic. Everything in this physical universe is created by God for reasons of His own, He doesn't keep it all secret. Genealogies? Look up Walter Kaiser, he the world's foremost expert on the subject, he can be seen with Dr. Ross debating Young Earth creationists on the Ankerburg show (on KZfaq)

@@SamytheGreek No matter how you twist or spin the genealogies in the Bible, you can't stretch them beyond thousands of years. Far short of the billions needed for any evolutionary processes to be a factor. God created the heaven and earth in six literal days. Science will never be able to explain that. Get over it.

@@SamytheGreek No, God did not use physics to create the universe. Read Genesis 1. Where are "physics" when God said "Let there be...." and spoke things into existance? Physics attempts to explain how the creation works. God's power created it. The laws of how it works came about only after it was created. God's power isn't magic. It's nothing like how magic is reported to work. Magic doesn't exist. Explain to me what "physics" are being used when, while in Galilee, Jesus fed 5000 men starting with a few loaves of bread and fish, and made actual baked bread and whole fish appear from thin air in the basket so all were fed and more was left over than when the apostles began to feed the people. Mathew 14: 13-21

@@SamytheGreek The Christian is left to talk about rubbish among other believers because the sane don't bother wasting their time with ultimate questions, people reach a point, they don't ponder them. If there were a god, then would there be any demand for scripture interpretations using fantasyland vocabulary? These are the wolves in sheep's clothing, we know them by their works: Jesus says faith is worthless if you can't move mountains by issuing verbal orders to one. Nothing fails like prayer in a children's hospital, & there is misinformation as if God does not have a perfect record of doing nothing, as if we had no reason for the saying: God helps those helping themselves.

I wouldn't be surprised to find out that more are educated to this information than we would guess, but knowledge is the booby prize, bc this information isn't profitable. Not profitable financially nor to those seeking power.

Depends on who you ask. If you ask those who are tied up in the woke nonsense, the answer to the China and India question would be: ...because that would be racist.

With all respect, I think you are wrong. The Bible is truth but the bible never claims that is scientific book. The bible has a different perspective, but not neccesarilly contradicts the science. In a sense the Bible answers questions like "why"...but the science answers question like "how". Whatever is true God stablish in that way. All the knowledge and intelligence came from God.

@@3MISARI0 Well, thank you for being respectful. Let me give a reply to some of your statements one at a time. You said: #1. “ The Bible is truth but the bible never claims that is scientific book.” Well, that’s a good thing, because science books are continually rewritten each year because they discover they were wrong. Gods word is God breathed (2nd Timothy 3:16) Just because the Bible is not specifically a science text book does not mean God lied to us when he said he created the physical universe in 6 days and rested for 1. Or when Gods told us the flood of Noah’s time covered the whole earth. Ross denies what God said, and perverts scripture and adds billions of years because he sees the Big Bang story as more authoritative than scripture. James 1:27 says we as believers are to keep from being contaminated by the world. Ross and others are very contaminated, and teach others to accept worldly contamination also. #2. You said: In a sense the Bible answers questions like "why"...but the science answers question like "how". The interpretation of things that occurred in the past cannot be validated with certainty, like our technology. All our technology is based on The Scientific Method. It is observable, testable, and the tests are repeatable under controlled conditions, giving the same result each time. That is real science. However, speculations about the past cannot be validated like real science. Also, scientists often have VERY different interpretations of evidence. Scientists are not infallible, and they very often come to very wrong conclusions about the past, especially those who do not adhere to a biblical worldview. In fact, The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has revealed The Big Bang predictions about deep space were completely wrong. Yet, Christian Astrophysicist Dr. Jason Lyell made predictions of what the JWST would find from a biblical view of cosmology, and the biblical timeline. All his predictions, based on scripture were correct, while Big Bang predictions were totally wrong. So, you see, Big Bang is not science. It is speculation that contradicts what God told us. The Bible says not to conform to this fallen world. And 2nd Corinthians 10:5 instructs us to destroy arguments and every lofty opinion raised against the knowledge of God. Big Bang and evolution are 2 lofty speculations that have been raised against the knowledge of God. I hope you will consider this. Also, If you want to know more about Ross, get the book Refuting Compromise: A biblical and scientific refutation of ‘progressive creationism’ (billions of years) as popularized by astronomer Hugh Ross by Dr Jonathan Sarfati.

or....maybe politicians lack proper values to fend off bribes and/or threats from greedy companies, or...maybe it's just that humans are degenerate, but... humans in society will always do better in a capitalistic economy under the umbrella of a Democratic-Republic.

Amen brother truthgiver, praise the Lord, can I get an Amen.

@@SamytheGreek Which lord there are so many of them?

@@truthgiver8286 Yes, I know. If you are going to go about it scientifically you'd have to study all the holy books from all the different religions. The Jews and Muslims say that there is only one, the Hindus have thousands, if not millions, Mormons and Jehovah's witness have a different model. I myself like the Tri-une model where by its one God but He is three (paradox), where by He is "the Father, the "Son", and "Holy Spirit". Study them good, decide on which one concords with the best science and go from there. Of coarse there are some that believe that we all evolved from a single cell to humans in 3.8 billion years, I guest that can be considered a religion too.

@@SamytheGreek There is no science in religion it is supernatural. The best science for how we all got to where we are is evolution but evolution is not a religion. If you can come up with a better answer along with enough evidence then that would replace evolution in the science books for the simple reason that science is not pushing an agenda it is simply looking for the truth. we all thought the sun orbited the earth but Giordano Bruno proved that the earth orbited the sun the Roman Catholics burnt him alive for heresy but science shows he is right.

@@truthgiver8286 Romans also threw Christians to lions, crucified them etc. Religion showed that they were wrong.

You have no story.

@@jeffperkins1862 what

@@YECBIB i didnt stutter.

@@jeffperkins1862 Are you a whackadoodle?

I've only recently been introduced to the gentleman through KZfaq. May I ask you for an example of a non-Christian view he has? Serious question.

This lecture really makes a person go towards a secular world view for sure.

@loweeization absolutely...and some say he is helping spread the Gospel! Insane. I wouldn't let this clown anywhere near a Church (or really any public venue)

@@fzr1000981 Not a single thing he teaches is Biblical.

Would it help if threw in a "Hallelujah" or a "praise the Lord" once in a while, maybe a "can I get an Amen" and spoke with a redneck accent? I know, he could have called himself "Brother Billy Bob Dupray".

I'd be careful with the mockery if I were you. Read I Corinthians 1 chap 1 and 3 sometime. The eternal God - who spoke the universe into existence - never appeals to pitiful human understanding, He transcends it. Vast imaginary eons is the ongoing lie of atheists and this guy is just reselling their lies in a slick package.