Yeah sure free pass.

You’re one dimensional

You’re one dimensional.

No he's the criminal when he runs over a toddler running infront of his car that he does not see cause he is playing with his fking cell phone

Sad. Money grab for the courts and police. %90 take seat belts off to grab their wallets.

Wrong again.

​@@Wilem35he's 100% correct .

@@Wilem35nope he’s absolutely correct

If the officer saw the kid even holding his phone on a public road then entered private property, he has broken the law. That's the sticking point here.

Wrong... for example the Ontario stunt driving law prohibits you from doing a burnout in your own driveway. So no you cannot claim that road laws don't apply on private categorically. EDIT: Case in point after looking it up, all Saskatchewan traffic laws apply to private lots.

And that judge needs to double the fines

​@@lylarose2696for what?? Using a cellphone in a drive thru? Wow. I'm no gynecologist but I know a Karen when I see one.

he drives a brand new BMW. you think he is somekind of poor?

@@Francois_Dupont This has nothing to do with wealth. It has to do with principle. If you have failed to see that then you're self-awareness is lacking.

@@MrBobbyBrown2006 the reporter clearly said "the ticket amonths is 580$ witch for this 18yo is a hefty amonth" @ 1:45

Cops getting creative with the law. Ridiculous

Maybe it is different where he is, but here where I live, if a cop were to try this then the cop would be breaking the law. Going by the laws here, this happened on private property and so the cop can't do anything unless the property owner requests it. And obviously McDonalds didn't request for the cop to do anything. Either they have stupid laws there or that cop is on a power trip and should be put in his place.

Did you not notice the one piece of information that isn't specified is WHERE Mason was when he pulled his phone out? I doubt he was in line at the drive thru when a cop came swinging up and ticketed him. Why didn't anybody else get ticketed? I'm sure there were others in the drive thru line with phone in hand and the McDonald's app open. How would the cop even have known someone in the drive thru had their phone in their hand and why target Mason? Do you think he was just randomly patrolling a McDonald's parking lot and picked a car in the drive thru to look into? Here's what I think happened because there's nothing stating otherwise: Mason had his phone in his hand on the road going to the McDonald's to place his order in advance. Just before he turned into the McDonald's, he passed a cop on a motorcycle who had to turn around. Mason proceeded to get in line at the drive thru and the cop came up behind him and issued him a ticket, which I admit he probably didn't have to do, he could have just given him a warning and said just make sure you're in line at the drive thru before pulling your phone out, but in any case the cop still issued the ticket rightfully. The ticket itself says it's for having phone in hand while on a public road. This tells me the cop caught him with his phone in his hand before he turned into the McDonald's. The cop doesn't know where Mason is going, all he knows is he saw a driver with their phone in their hand and needs to catch up with them. I don't think Mason's court battle is going to go the way he's hoping it will if this is the case.

@@Lincolntowncoupe Doesn't even matter, its a private property open to the public. HTA applies.

That would mean they’d actually have to do actual work no?

They don't post those videos.

Then you don't agree with the distracted driving law.... no offence but you need to realise the issue here is mainly because how lazy and far reaching and abusive our laws are made. Ofc police judgment is also part here but it goes back to our lazy laws,. A police officer can F your life up if they feel like it and apply laws. For example disturbing the peace, if you have a heated discussion with an officer and their ego is bruided they'll threathen to arrest you for disturbing peace because you "speak to loud".

​@TheMidnightNarwhthanks officeral

@@TheMidnightNarwhal and it's valid. Just like if I yell at my mother she put me in timeout. The sad part is most of this generation never got the belt or wooden spoon and cannot see past their own nose.

In uniform?

Why are the Cops bad they are trying to keep him alive. Find a safe place to pull over and then order your food.

A person in Ontario is injured every 30 min due to distracted driving. Look it up.

@Dr.BertFegg Not in a fast food drive ... through at crawl speed, intermittent full stopping ... on private property. These stats are well, hmmm look it up. Oh ya ... exactly zero. Sloppy legal sophistry and absent any common sense. Loonie argument.

In drive throughs ​@@Dr.BertFegg

@@Dr.BertFegghow many are injured by cops?

Nonsense, every province except Ontario can charge you on private property. The laws of 5he land apply,.

​@Wilem35 not the laws of the road!

@@Wilem35only if there’s a complaint

@@Wilem35nope that’s completely false. Here’s a bit of info if you get a ticket from the police and they are on private property if the land owner didn’t give them permission then you can get the ticket dropped

Oh, if this is Canada, it explains a lot.

Highway Traffic laws do not apply to private property

@@lars309only in Ontario

@sjtwstot Actually it does lol. Go look up Canadian law

I wish you'd all educate yourselves... If the cop saw the kid with his phone even just being held on public roads, then turned in to private property, he's guilty of distracted driving. If not, he may get off, that's the point to fight in court.

@sjtwstot Wow, such a great response - that's really all you have? A grade school insult? Literally police cannot ticket you on private property especially for something like this. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just out to lunch lol It takes more than a graduation from high school to find this out.

They can do that too. It's entirely up to the cop. At least in regards to the no electronic devices hands free or otherwise rule for N drivers, the law isn't definitive. So a lot of situational interpretation goes into it usually it's fine, I guess. But you get one D-head like this and suddenly this becomes a question of concern.

Yeah, about 7 years ago then with an even sharper spike downward about 3.5 years ago.

@@KevinMah-ol5on are not you amazed how come a guy could deteriorate the living conditions of his fellow citizens in just 3 5 years. How could somebody create so much damage in so short period of time and he still does not want to leave power.

You are 100% correct. Only exception to that would be if McDonald’s asked the police to be there for that reason

@@jumbome7420 I already see The cop saying the kid was on the road when he seen him on the phone..But then he would had to be beside him And then get behind him And go into Mcdonalds ..far fetched But its what they do to back peddle a ticket A normal judge would see thru all this and dismiss it

@@scambaitspidey3470 The >>>"Highway Traffic Act"

Lawyer, starting at $1,000. Ticket - $500. The officer already won.

its the demarits he is concerned about they said as they did not mention money so obviously he has money

@@rickystarduster*mommy n daddy have money

@@richardsanchez9397 In case ya didn't listen they said he was on lunch break from work. For all we know he works hard, and bought a used BMW. What he drives is not the point in this story, unless you're jealous.

They have muffins

The cop caught him on his phone out on the street and followed him into the parking lot to give him the ticket

Lmao you're dumb

Wrong, Cletus.

@@titusmccarthy if you say so Doofy

You forgot Herr Smith 😂

WRONG.

Very this

Not the point

Not the point nimrod

He's 18. I promise you his parents bought it for him.

He was using it entering into the drive through, he was just pulled over at the drive through. Apparently. I don't see any officer giving out a ticket unless this child began to argue.

Apparently he followed him into the parking lot and pulled him over at the drive through.

Fired and sued for doing his job? The McDonalds doesn't own the parking lot, another company does and they are available to the public. You are required to obey traffic laws inside a parking lot by law.

yep

Tell that the the police…they seem to be magically trained 😂

Not really driving here, but whatever

Private property open to the public. HTA applies.

Like you, the young fellow may be a dipper

Private property, open to the public. HTA laws apply. You would need a sign that says PRIVATE PROPERTY and deny police officers, who would still have jurisdiction because your license says operate a vehicle with an electronic device, not operate an electronic device WHILE USING PUBLIC ROADS. If you damage your vehicle how is your insurance supposed to know you were obeying all laws? So if you got to the McDonalds then we can assume you have insurance and breaking the policy.

Private land for the public to use. Laws apply. You cannot bait someone into a parking lot then have distracted drivers hit your children. McDonalds 16 year old employee definitely wont enforce it, neither will the company that owns the parking lot (mcdonalds doesn't own the parking lot) So they require police officers to enforce it. I know right!? Police officers caring about children! What a sin!!

@@scambaitspidey3470 I'm sorry, road laws do not apply. A Police officer cannot ticket you on private land. They have zero jurisdiction. Unless the police officer wanted to take it to court as a civilian. In which they would lose.

Hopefully there is some evidence to support that.

open to the public. HTA applies.

Give yourself a pat on the back 🤣🤣🤣

Yeeeaaaah but the drive thru isn't that either. If I had to guess, he took issue with the guy letting his vehicle roll while doing it I could see that being unnerving like he wasn't aware of or controlling the vehicle. I dunno.