than*

+Daniel Greiner shut the hell up

you mad af, gg idiot.

also, fuck to police, degenerate for revenue.

most likely its a park policy concerning public safety. I do not actually believe they can keep his drone but I think he was more giving him the option to enter without it or leave.

break these nonsensical rules that you don't know and we'll steal your shit. murica!

+gibsona7x13 dumbass.

Did you just commit genocide? Oh sht i just did too with my words! 😱

Welcome to usa land of the free one day👍👍

You couldn’t be anymore wrong

That bit did it for me too!

Won't be that easy for them since it's not like everyday you get to film a guy shooting down drones

There is a level of expectation. a Frisbee can't do a reasonable amount of harm and riding a bike has it's limitations. You have certain places to ride the bike you just can't ride it around people. This issue seems to have been well discussed and taken into consideration and the decision to not allow him to fly a drone over a crowd of people. There is no telling what happens if the think malfunctions and hits someone. It's a very reasonable decision.

+Kartracer6 that's unrealistic expectations that deny basic rights. I have the right to enjoy a public park. "but it could hit me" then pay attention to your surroundings. baseball, soccer, tennis, basketball all of our recreational activities come with some inherent risk. it's a risk you agree to when you visit any public place. if you go to a restaurant, you risk food poisoning. if you go to a new barber, you risk a bad haircut. if you drive a car, you risk a car accident. even walking you risk being hit. I can't make you less afraid. but I can enjoy my life and take responsibility if my drone did hit someone. but like a bike or car, I'm in control. my skills as a operator are not up for debate.

Mr. Potato it's not an unrealistic expectation many of these drones can get up to speeds of 50 to 60 mph, some even faster. There is a limit to your expectation of risks. Sports risks are only to those who involve themselves in the sport or choose to spectate. Restaurants have standards that must be met, barber shop is a private business they can't regulate that other then training laws, and driving a car has regulations. Based on your view point I should be legally allowed to drive my car at high speeds thru the park and not be stopped because my skills as an operator are not up for debate.

+Kartracer6 if you or anyone else is that afraid of my drone... go home... leave the park. but you have no right to tell me that what I'm doing is wrong or not allowed. just like I can't tell you to stop playing Frisbee... I can only give you more room. you talk about courtesy, yet, give none. nor do you present logic that I find to be conclusive of any real danger beside that which is expected on a day to day basis.

+Kartracer6 also... you just said the risk is for those who participate or spectate... why would you spectate my drone if you're afraid I'll hit you? this logic applies to a sport. you just said it yourself...

than you do not need to follow their unlawful orders and if they assault you you shoot them..murica..

Lewandowski

Eric Lewandowski same!

So fuck with them then. I would be CONSTANTLY flying and baiting them out. Constantly.

at what point was there a search or seizure?

the mere fact he is being questioned without criminal activity afoot is a violations. Plus the threat of taking the helicopter would be a seizure of his property with no law that gives him that authority. He doesn't make the law, his job is to enforce it whether he likes it or not.

Matthew Mathews 1.) him being questioned isn't illegal. They told him multiple times he wasn't being detained for any crimes. No law says you can't approach and ask someone questions. 2.) taking the item may have been more of a threat then an actual promise. They never actually seized the item from him. Honestly what they should have done was asked him to comply or leave the park. But to be fair the officer was extremely professional and polite and explained to him that his actions where unsafe.

First comply with what? If there is no law against flying the drone then there is nothing to comply with. Second, Every state has their own laws on criminal procedure and I will give you that. But here in New York, polie encounters for a request of information reduces questioning to a general nonthreatening encounter in to ask briefly about identity, address, destination, and or a reason for being in the area. Any communication in NY other than name and destination requires articulable facts that support founded suspicion that indicates criminality is afoot.• For example, a police officer may not ask the occupants of a lawfully stopped vehicle if they posses a weapon w/out founded suspicion for that inquiry like bullets in plain view on the floor. Therefore, unless there is founded suspicion that someone is violating a specific law, the police in New York cannot just start asking you questions. Again every state is different, here our State Constitution give its people a lot more protections than is federal counterpart.

Matthew Mathews Law? It's a policy. They deemed it a public safety issue. This isn't about the law, the park can make policies and police them even if they aren't a law (as long as they aren't breaking the law by making them).

By this idiot pigs logic... maybe we should make drugs and drinking and dtiving illegal. Then they will go away too.......... oh wait.... DOH.

Lern too spel

Oh

@Kollin King you dumbass

I think the drone and drone hobbyist go hand in hand

Lol really...drone hobbyists....LMFAO aaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah did you really just say that and are serious...what do you feel misled by the title thinking you were going to see.... what.......come on bro...i've seen some anal replies but your's is number one lol.

harry guy its not like the drones are fighting the cops. its more like drone operators against cops

I prefer the term; Drone Enthousiast.

you guys think your being smart but truth is all your going to accomplish is giving these assholes reasons to make up laws etc to stop us flying our drones .well done !!!

I think it's not allowed to fly drones in public areas but im not 100% sure. But most police don't really care about drones as they have better things to do.

If you are in turkey Never fly a drone

In Thailand there were supposed to be new laws coming in to ban drones but it never happened so I am very happy that I can fly anywhere except near Private Property & The Royal Families Residences

+Drone Compilations I don't fly drones (quadcopters) but RC helicopters and the rules all not too clear on that at the moment. if you would like to know more about drone regulations visit the AMA site but the last 6 months there were some drastic regulations announced but they never became a law. so the police doesn't know how to regulate the flying of drones at the moment. BUT!!! all i can say is that the drone hype haven't done good for the other rc flying hobby. because of D-bags that fly them and causing trouble for the rest. all i can say is use common sense when flying. like never fly over a crowd. if you are asked to leave don't make a problem about that and search for a new spot. and if you can join a rc club that has a dedicated field.

I run a business flying these drones and I must say with the new regulations taking action on August 29th under Part 107 of the FAA, you may not fly over any persons or facilities not participating in the event as a cause of safety hazard if the drone fails and falls and injures someone. You now have to be certified to fly drones commercially by the FAA.

Thank you, and we will continue to create content for you because you are awesome! If you have any ideas for future episodes and we decide to use that idea - let me know and we will personally credit anyone for their ideas!

+Drone Compilations mm first of all, make a top 5 for the highest drones have gone, second of all, what do u mean be "we"?

Well, although largely run by just one person, I do like to give credit to my better half for her continued support and ideas she brings to the table therefore to prevent any accusations of selfishness by my better half I tend to insert we as it can be deemed a team effort :) That is a great idea for a video by the way!

+Drone Compilations oohhhh ok I see know, I thank both of you for keeping us entertained

Hey SAVG_Angel - Top 5 Highest Drone Flights! - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/irhxgMd2nsnLaX0.html OUT NOW!

Technically you cannot fly over a populated area and a park would fall under that.

That was two hours ago :)

Have a great day my buddy! =) I hope I inspire you to do great things in the future!

Drone Compilations I Already Know Im Going To LCC Community College In Kinston,NC For Drone/UAV Education and then im going to look for another college for engineering And Things Like That! Have A Great Day To You My Friend!

That is great I hope you learn loads of new cool stuff!

The potato thing made me laugh. Xd

Legally you cannot fly it out of sight so you are wrong.

***** Drone - an unmanned aircraft or ship that CAN navigate autonomously, without human control or beyond line of sight. CAN...not should.. It is capable of going out of line of sight, therefore it is a drone.

Who gives a rats ass just call it what you want if u want call it a bucket of water

Lunar Fire I'm not arguing what I would or wouldn't call any of them. Personally I hate the term 'drone' and the negative connotation it carries. I'm simply stating correct use of the word.. And if in you're example you have FPV attached to your plane which allows you to operate it beyond your own line of sight - then yes it is a drone. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with the actual frame/means of propulsion. Fixed wing can be in the category just as much as multi-rotor. This is the reason the FAA blanketed their regulations across all model aircraft and not just multi-rotors.

Stop talking shit.

Yeah yeah yay 👌

our*

Apparently..

Lern too spel

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I watched this again, because someone commented to my post. I can't believe 5 years has past since the last time!!! But here's my take after watching it again. If the park is Federal, State, County, or City owned (or any other governmental body), then one of two things need to happen: 1) A Law/Code must be past saying such. OR 2.) A Blanket Law/Code must be passed stating that the park manager has the right to set any policy he wishes and that the policy itself can be enforced (weaker but MAYBE valid). Now if it's a PRIVATE park, that's a whole different ballgame and they can do what they like - it amounts to trespassing and not RC-Aircraft stuff. So, assuming it's a public park, some type of law or code must be put through the legal process before an "enforcer" can enforce anything. I would have said, "I intend to keep flying." He would have said, then, "I intend to confiscate." I would not have "let" him confiscate by saying, I do not agree to your confiscation but I wont try to resist or stop you. Let him confiscate. Get it all documented. Then sue the officers involved personally, sue the department they come from, sue the governmental entity that they represent. Get lots of $$$ from having your rights trampled by government and causing you distress, sleepless nights, etc. They buy a whole bunch of RC-Aircraft and a Mansion to fly them around. ;)