That's a low bar, then he gets mad

Maybe Trump could be looking at this idea.

It isn't the truth because our politicians are far from handsome.... But besides that yep, lol. xD

@@mynamewhatis7254 Along with other nuts out there nowadays.

And the politicians still raised taxes.

The issue is North & South Pole plus Greenland ice ARE MELTING and it's slowing the crazy heat that will be burning up much of the planet soon=why there areDENIALISTS!. Tropical places getting the flood monsoons of rain and hurricanes will change too. The thing is GLOBAL CORPORATIONS WILL PROFIT FROM REBUILDING and supplying desperate people dying while they're in rich SAFE MANSIONS and HOTELS- TRUMP! & his Coal&Gas & Russia Mineral&Gas billionaire buddies.

klyana130 Mmmmmm nop, the north is melting but the south os big and plenty, also the climate changing is pretty comun on short periods of time making little rising and cooldowns. The heat that hearth recieve is not constant.

Sorry, but no, while I'd agree he isn't entirely correct, it's nowhere near common for these kinds of temperature changes to be occurring at this rate and intensity. If the jagged skew of CO2 progression that overlaps with heat is confusing you I suggest you look up the reason, it'll probably only take you less than a minute. The South pole is also melting at an exponential rate, the danger Southern icecaps melting are actually even more of a problem than the northern ones because you have landlocked ice slipping back into the Oceans coupled with the fact that the South Pole is considerably bigger, which will cause an even more pronounced rise in water levels. The heat the Earth receives is indeed not constant, you can observe it in yearly temperature patterns that have been observed and measured for centuries, and it's linked largely to the angle of the Earth which shifts through the year in what we feel as seasons, so it's felt on the position of one on earth, not as a whole. The kind of temperature shifts you're suggesting this distribution represents is not even remotely in the same ballpark as the imbalances that are occurring.

ONCE AND FOR ALL KYLANA

Everyone's attitude toward >insert issue here.

It’s been years and I still don’t know what this means lol

@@VenusChad child abuse

@@asfrflagcommunity966 oh fun!

@@asfrflagcommunity966 plus alcohol

@@koppi732 don't forget drugs

Millwater Publishing Yup basically​block out the sun. Fallout series is now cannon to real life. Wait we're all just background characters in a book?!

Futurama continuity ruined ;_; ;_;

Conciliator it's okay it was already ruined. Everytime they did anything with time travel they didn't account for other time travel episodes

nuclear winter is only temporary but it does reset humanity so thats why we didn't end up a shriveled planet by 3000

The Nuclear Winter lasted until 2063, at which point politicians finally managed to do something

The former President would disagree.

Makes a change eh

It's the crazy people banning nuclear (which always gets replaced with fossil fuels). 🤷‍♀️

I mean, China are sorta responsible for around 1/3 of all emissions

@@violet-trash ikr, it's so disappointing

this was in a documentary that my school had shown to us

Eu4 you need not be such a tinfoil, ours played it too.

Be that is it may, this scene was included in An Unconvient Truth which was shown to many schools at the time of its release because of the educational content. So it's not that hard to accept it as an innocuous truth.

No seriously this was in an inconvenient truth and it was played for students. I saw it 3 times in 3 different classes.

Embrigh global warming will actually decrease water level so how will people make ice lol. you will decrease water to make ice cube which consists of water to put in water to increase it

What a boring pseudoscience fantasy film that was.

@@Thoralmir I know right! New York flooded years before the movie said it would lol

@@craigkingdon4424 I mean... You're not wrong. Which is probably why he never responded.

@@craigkingdon4424 New York flooded? I had a sister who went on holiday there just last year. I had no idea she was a mermaid. I guess I'll have to put her down. Can't let something like that live...

@@jimmehjiimmeehh9748 I think they're more referring to how NYC has been getting flooded during those really big storms. You know, those storms that are only going to become more frequent and worse due to the effects of global warming. Not to mention rising sea levels, which is only going to fuck things up for coastal cities. It wouldn't necessarily put the skyscrapers underwater, but it would fuck up infrastructure and flood New York's subways and roads if it is not properly addressed

If we ever suffer nuclear annihilation like they did in Futurama, all of a sudden the 1950s would become a lot more relevant to history. It's my opinion that's also why the Fallout series uses the 1950s so much.

@@pyrotechnick420 why

fashion always returns

@@pyrotechnick420 The 1950s was a time when the threat of nuclear war was very real. The US and Russia both had enough weapons to obliterate the other several times over, pointed at each other and each other's allies. There was a constant fear that one aggressive action, or just a misunderstanding, and there wouldn't be many people left on either side. At the same time technology promised a future of wealth and plenty for all. The Fallout series taps into both aspects: It is set in the future dreamed off by 1950s America, a future of prosperity and patriotism, but which has been destroyed by the things they feared.

​@@vylbird8014Don't forget where they have giant robots and lasers and weird Jetsons automobiles instead of the invention of Rock & Roll or something like that lol

You shouldn't look to comedy for knowledge.

@@LordTalax The fault doesn't lay with comedy.

@@LordTalax Pfft the Writers of the show had over 50 collective years of education at Harvard. I'd say they're more than knowledgeable.

@@LordTalax Comedy is pretty educational if it’s not shit

maybe if you're American

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

This reminds me of that video of the guy who thought that wind turbines were just fans that cooled down the earth

@@user-fl6ww3rs5q wow

@@user-fl6ww3rs5q giant air conditioners

@@_MrLee Honestly, with how hot it’s been in a lot of states in the U.S. during the summer, I bet people wouldn’t mind having some giant air conditioners to cool things down for a change.

@@user-fl6ww3rs5q which is ALSO something that gets mocked in the same episode - "WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY! GOODNIGHT!"

How about the 50C heatwave in canada?

Your kidding holy shit then again I’m Aussie and i have 28 degree days in winter where I am

Peak temperature druing the summer here in Bosnia has been 50C almost every year since 2012.

No YOU are giant hot muscles.. ( ͝° ͜ʖ͡°)ᕤ

Considering the ice making process isn't 100% efficient,the second law of thermodynamics states that entropy of an isolated system always increases.Basically you're generating even more heat by making the ice cube.But I'm sure the writers were aware of the absurdity.

Rohan Pansari They didn't make the ice. They got it from comets in space

the ice cubes would do nothing, earth would catch fire, we would die from radiation poisioning cause of no ozone layer, suzy would flip out, and the continints would flood cause of ice water + polar caps

Rohan Pansari NERRRRRRRRDDDDDDDD

They don't make the ice cube, it's mined from Halley's Comet. Watch the damn show! Until then lurk more.

Education for the intellectually impaired. (I.E. Climate Deniers that don't understand science.)

Aduro Tri Those same people who watch this probably believe that the solution presented is what is occurring.

Let's call Global Warming as Climate Change due to that winter-like weather that disprove Global Warming being true

or we could just call it climate change because thats what it is and not worry about he silly argument that if it's ever cold that somehow "disproves" that the climate is getting warmer over all.

No matter what we call it, people will find some retarded excuse to try and disprove it.

rip

Same. I was the only one in class who recognized this from Futurama.

It's not accurate

@@pderham26 GREATEST EXPLANATION EVER

​@alfasiger4178 it's a tax scam

@@halo091 You WILL be taxed for exhaling carbon dioxide and driving a combustion engine vehicle and using an AC unit. It's the only way the politicians can stop the evil climate change.

​@@halo091 nope, it's established physics understood for over 100 years, validated in the 1950s, and the only viable explanation for recent global warming as shown by multiple lines of evidence.

Yes, same creator

Well they did bring Lisa Simpson in lol

David X Cohen was a simpsons writer and he was the showrunner (I think he still is in the 2023 reboot)

@@pricerowland bro is there a 2023 reboot of Futurama coming??? 🤯

@@intellektualPoet Yep. Idk why they keep bothering to cancel it.

Y.. yeah.

I kind of heard "Global Whopper" and got hungry.

WOAH!

It's relatable AND educational!

I used it for an undergrad project on geoengineering. XD

like trump after he tweets and then the news repeats it

That's gotta be Mitch McConnel. Dude's hotter than a West coast wildfire.

weird that holland isn't completely underwater

No, but they are considering putting more clouds in the sky.

Shut up zoidberg

@@the_lancer_the WOOOOOOOOP WOOP WOOP WOOP WOOP!!!

Lots of folks (like bill gates) are working on carbon capture technologies and IV generational nuclear plants (very hard to have meltdowns/contamination)

@@pepperonipizza8200 dumbest idea in the world, I hate these billionare nuts that want to experiment on the entire world like they own it

yes because it is old by when they watch it and old movies are on film

The father is an angry drunk.

Killing babies and mental illness?

It isn't a baby until there's brain waves, before that point it's an organ. And if its unwanted, it is technically a tumor

@@spooky5338 isn't that extremely fucking early into the gestation period and extremely arbitrary way of defining when it becomes a baby? From my knowledge, necessary functions are the first to be developed with a fetus.

@@tranidite About a month and a half, then it starts developing predispositions for things on the exterior. The brain isn't functioning before that point, and there is no way thoughts occur outside the brain. It cannot really be considered human until it starts functioning like one.

@@spooky5338 and for what it's worth, family already gets to decide when to pull the plug on someone who is braindead, so even if you believe it's murder, it's in line with existing acceptable practice.

Well, considering it's a space ship dropping it off, I think you have your answer

Patrolling the Mojave almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter

It should've happened decades ago

Unless they take water from the sea, freeze it and put it back.

Cough cough if the ice-caps melted to that point THE EARTH WOULD FUCKING FLOOD

In the episode they did get the ice from space.

Oh, of course it would, which also happened in Earth's climate history. The Earth's temperature in 11500 BCE peaked at 1.5 degrees Celsius cooler than the modern era and then declined rapidly to over the course of 750 years by a whole degree entirely because of melting glaciers. We're talking about a volume of ice that was taller than anything in New York city today while they were there, and so much of it that the event which triggered such a dramatic global cooling was a floor of ice across the entire north american continent - creating the great lakes in the process. Water levels raised so high that if such an event happened today, it would destroy all of coastal civilization. Then it continued to warm to what the temperature we had last year until 8250 BCE when the global climate stabilized and held at that until around 7250 BCE - a thousand years of climate stability! - when a ice sheet broke off cooling the oceans. However this time it only cooled by a quarter of a degree while increasing ocean levels nearly 4 meters before returning to that temperature within 250 more years. It then got a little warmer than the average due to unusual volcanic eruptions for a few hundred years before once again returning to the norm. Humans first appeared during these few thousand years of relative climate stability, but then the planet cooled by 2 degrees over the course of thousands more years and then, at the start of the industrial revolution, the global climate moved back up and it only took 200 hundreds to go back to those temperatures. The speed of the increase was faster than any warming period in all of Earth's history, so even though humans can handle these temperatures, it was still problematic. An even larger problem is that, as of now, the planet is hotter than it has ever been since it was a cooling ball of molten rock. To summarize, a mere 4 meters of global flooding made .75 degree difference for just 250 years while flooding vastly greater and for 3 times longer made a full 1 degree difference. That degree makes the difference for life, but it isn't that much of a jump from .75 degrees and that's quite a bit of flooding, which is why I suggest frozen nitrogen instead. Of course, this also outlines another problem with global climate change predictions: It's happening, but in addition to ocean acidification slowing down the rate of carbon dioxide release in the atmosphere (which will lead to a much more dramatic temperature increase when the carbon sink can't hold any more) but the melting of the ice caps in and of themselves cause the global temperatures to cool. Global temperatures are still on the climb though, because localized polar climate cooled fast enough that a refreezing event occurred, which unfortunately gave climate change deniers some ammo to work with, not realizing what every student who took Chem 1 will understand about the phase change of water.

You here after scientists are planning to actually do this?

Thinning Ozone allows more UV rays to penetrate the atmosphere. But now a days since most of those ozone killing chemicals have been banned, the only parts still thin are at the poles.

Parts are getting thinner and other parts are getting thicker

I don't think the thicker or thinner part is that important, it's more that greenhouse gases absorb certain wavelengths of light - the ones coming from the sun to the Earth have quite short wavelengths and are therefore barely absorbed, but light being thrown back into space has longer wavelengths and gets absorbed by the molecules of greenhouse gases and then being released into a random direction - some towards space, some back to Earth. Whichs means a percentage of otherwise outgoing light will bounce back to Earth, heating it more like in a microwave. This mostly happens in the troposphere, the lowest layer of atmosphere while the ozone layer is in the stratosphere which is the layer above that. The troposphere thickens, the stratosphere is getting thinner. But at least Co2 has no direct effect on the ozone layer, but the troposphere has to expand somewhere, so it basically cuts into the stratosphere, taking space away from it and I think Co2 also has the opposite effect there, making the stratosphere cooler - because there is less heat caused by that light going back into space. I mean, sooner or later the light will eventually go into space I guess, but energy isn't endless and I would guess that light gets increasingly less hot the more often it bounces between Earth surface and troposphere. Which by the way one of the reasons why we can differentiate between global warming caused by more sun activity and global warming caused by greenhouse gases. Increased sun activity heats all layers while greenhouse gases only heat the troposphere and cools the higher layers.