To be fair it's impossible to say with a straight face

And the boos are perfect and hilarious 😂😆

Longer than your dominant hand?

That's so romantic

@@evandickinson6393 Got ‘em!

Nice I found them when I was looking for reviews for valerian and the city of thousand planets.

@@evandickinson6393 🔥🔥🔥

lmao same

Don't encourage him, please, I've got money...

I had this one spotted three words in, hope he isn’t losing his fastball!

@@meloD30 I'm listening

More Ben please. He's the stealth 3rd voice of this channel.

You yourself are an example of nominative determinism, having the appearance of two or more large cats.

I did NOT expect Around the Twist. But then, does anyone ever?

And Blue Harvest :)

And RODNEYYYYYYYYYYYY!

His role in Margin Call was awful and despite Joe Rogan not committing crimes or breaking the law, he is not a good person.

@@steverogers7601 whatever, crackhead

@@steverogers7601 "Authoritarians did nothing wrong"

@@steverogers7601 wtf are you on about Irons is magnificent in Margin Call. Absolutely cold blooded CEO done extremely well.

​@@Davidsworldtravels hes a Joe rogan fan so really that says it all.

They deserve to have that tattooed on their forehead.

Brilliant

Nah mate, he ate so much scenery they had to waste their entire effects budget on replacing it all with CGI backgrounds

Chewing*

​@@MrJakePaddy no, he swallowed...

So did Mason😂😂😂

Haven't watched it yet but does it have to do with Rodney?

@@futuredozer1735 indirectly, yes

I actually got as far as thinking, "Wow, I can't believe they went to all that trou-.....waaaiiit a minute."

And doesn't at least one of the eyes disintegrate whatever it looks at?

Plus extremely combatative with other beholders.

@@Sharklops Each eye has a different magic ability. The main eye can fire a disintegration beam.

Very weird that one would be on guard duty as well.

@@MorallyDubiousFrog Actually, at least as of 5e, the main eye is an anti-magic field

I was actually discussing this very flick last week with a mate who didn't know it existed and he was like, "Oh they made one in 2000" and I was all "That must have been the third one then" but it wasn't, Harry, it wasn't the third one at all! It was the first one, then the sequels are even more years after fuckin' _The Matrix_ and _Jurassic Park_ and _Lord of New Zealand_ and shit!

Lord of New Zealand is my jam

The lighting on the AI generated images is too good to be copied from this movie. I suspect their main refferences are _Krull_ and _Ladyhawk_

I genuinely didn't know this was from the year 2000 until this video. I thought it was made in, like, 1993 or something (that being said, I've never actually seen the movie, I just know of its existence).

Ya but DND is

So True...👌

Good movie, underrated, but I still hate they cut a lot of stuff

Best is still Dragonslayer.

well they did the smart thing and mainly had 1 dragon at a time and shown hiding behind real scenery and sets most of the time. This movie went nuts and had like 70 badly rendered dragons all flying around a fake city and fake sky.

Deep cut and underappreciated joke

It’s amazing to see

HOOT-GROWL! HOOT-GROWL!

Was totally expecting a Hilda-Hilda reference when they started talking about funny names

​@@IAmMightyMike what was the joke?

I do kind of feel for the guy. He got the rights cheaply because the owners of the IP probably never expected anything to come of it, only for those same people to alienate some of the hottest directing talent in Hollywood and place him in the position of having to direct a SFX-heavy action-fantasy film with no prior experience and just over a third of the budget that would have been available if they'd been able to secure commitment from someone with a proven track record. Honestly I think that the lackluster state of the CGI, video compositing and dungeoneering sections can be attributed to the budget and the lack of experience necessary to make up for those deficiencies. They probably couldn't afford to do much in the way of fight choreography, or give the actors a sufficient amount of money to justify spending the time on choreography and rehearsal, and I imagine that the CGI issues weren't helped by the intended scope (especially at the end where there are loads of dragons flying around and causing chaos. They kind of picked the worst possible creatures to try and animate: the number of unique animations and variation in models that would have been needed to translate the dragons to the screen for such a brief part of the film would have been really difficult to do well back then. At least the beholder didn't have legs, but integrating it into footage convincingly and articulating every on of its eyes and facial features probably ended up making it a quite difficult creature in its own right and it doesn't look great.).

Thieves didnt even give you a source credit.

Same here

that clip is pure D&D energy

Life comes at you fast.

Yeah, I grew up with ps1 graphics, this seemed awesome looking at the age of 11... Still felt boring and stupid tho.

I'm not sure what it says either, but it's certainly a lot

I contend that current Sandler is fine. You just have to start with 2016 after The Do Over. The Hotel Transylvania movies are decent kid flicks, and everything else ranges from passable to fantastic (he genuinely deserved an Oscar nod for Uncut Gems).

No one deserved Pixels…

I don’t even wanna watch a video making fun of Pixels, imagine having to watch the full movie! And having to go over certain scenes several times to get the edit right!

​@@wesstapley Naaaaaaaaaah

The old stuff was on the same level as the new stuff. Make of that what you will...

Nicely put huge nerd