Great thank you, so much clearer than reading the text

I don't get a single thing... But better than my lessons at school, this I can rewatch

Bravo Strict clear line of logic demonstrating not only the principle ideas but how they develop into a working systemic theory. The inclusion of the books was appreciated as was providing Google search history. Your the winner.

Well done Sir. You gave it a ( KISS)! Keep it simple stupid. I understand better then I did reading 100 pages of text!!

Thank you

Explained really well thank ypu

This came in my exam thanks alot

So in industrial societies, the only social cohesion is that different jobs/specialisations depend on each other in the market economy. And that holds societies together, despite everyone's different lifestyles and outlooks (compared to an agrarian society where everyone's a farmer). But what happens if an industry dies, or is automated, or is outsourced to a cheaper country? All those professions are abandoned by the rest of society (i.e. social cohesion fails). It implies that market economies are inherently unstable for society because the different professions are constantly changing. So countries use something else to hold themselves together (nationalism, religion, a common enemy). Or they limit technological and market penetration.

Great video

very useful video thank yoooooou!!!!!!

thank you!

really helpful. Thank you

Thank you ❤️

Why would a peasant willingly send a lot of or most of the food they grow the city? They wouldn't. The flow of food from the fields to the cities is always coercive. It is in fact, the primary function of the state.

Thanks brother

Can someone help me ," What is the alternative of Gemeinschaft in Emile Durkheims Theory?

I noticed some parellels between this and Ted Kaczynski's beliefs if taken pessimistically

Hi! I'm using your video to help write my essay, how can I site your information??

Nice

thanks a lot

Good effort dude, but kind of hard on the ear , memory is encoded acoustically and semantically, I suggest something hormonic rather than clashing cymbals and add stories and humor that people want to remember

Slow down

examine the views that without durkheim, max and Spencer there is no sociology