E=MC^2 : Mathematical derivation of Mass-Energy equivalence equation.

Рет қаралды 34,869

7 жыл бұрын

A mathematical derivation of Mass-Energy equivalence equation of Albert Einstein, E=MC^2.
Website : physicsjustlikethat.blogspot.com/
Kindly note: While taking the integral one has to take the limits and the constant term into account, which need to be gained from experiments. For simplicity, I have not used either of them while taking the integral at the end of the video.
E=Energy
C=Speed of light
m=mass
v=velocity of the mass
F=Force
S=Distance
P=momentum
t=time
w=work or energy

Пікірлер: 35

@Matematicand01 2 ай бұрын

In the end, Einstein needed Newton's math to counterproof Newton's physics.

@firstolasto1518 Ай бұрын

And Pythagoras.

@ujjalkumardutta7777 5 жыл бұрын

Thank you sir, The way you prove is excellent

@sajidrafique375 6 ай бұрын

At 2:30 , pls show how m=mo/sq root 1-v`2 was derived. The rest i understand

@user-un1rb1es2c 4 ай бұрын

read special and general theory of relativity ....mo is the original mass while m is the mass while a body moves through space

@Inserthandle-ff6jw 3 ай бұрын

m0 is the mass of a object while at rest (rest mass) and m0/√(1-v²/c²) is the mass of object while it is in motion

@Imran52Feb 3 ай бұрын

but how did you directly write m=m0/gamma? That itself needs derivation!

@handsonphysics6635 2 ай бұрын

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e7KYnsKC153ce3k.html please refer to this video

@Imran52Feb 2 ай бұрын

Kindly post a video for step by step derivation of Dirac's relativistic Quantum mechanics including his gamma matrices . Thanks a lot in advance .

@handsonphysics6635 2 ай бұрын

Relativistic Mass derivation : kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e7KYnsKC153ce3k.html

@trizarabia 11 ай бұрын

Yes, great job!

@murgangovindasamy7628 11 ай бұрын

Doesnt the E in E= F*dS refer to kinetic energy?

@michaelstick8580 Жыл бұрын

Bravo.Very Inspiring.

@zahidahmad7054 8 ай бұрын

In relativistic mass, in square root, velocity v is constant according to special relativity, then why taking derivative of v non-zero

@dahntaedeluna 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@akshayggopi2280 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks Manhhh.....😎🤘

@dhchdhcj9675 6 жыл бұрын

Thank you now i can solve it

@leftsmile5096 4 ай бұрын

great video!

@aminsaraj4786 6 жыл бұрын

really was an easier way for me

@MrPrasanth1975 5 жыл бұрын

Keep it up

@norbertocriado7718 Жыл бұрын

What about units? mass units maybe Kg, c is meters/sec, then c² is meters²/sec²... resulting energy units in Kg * meters²/secs² ?????

@alihansencerberk9670 Жыл бұрын

You can check if answers are correct through units, however you can't fully solve problem just by equalizing them.

@brizoyt661 9 ай бұрын

kg*m/s²=N so kg*m²/s²=Nm=J

@abandz1132 Жыл бұрын

Not plus c for the final integration

@alihansencerberk9670 Жыл бұрын

Though it isn't in the video, the integral are actually definite integrals (from s1 to s2, from v1 to v2, etc) so there is no +c

@UnCavi Жыл бұрын

@@alihansencerberk9670 then why isn't he integrating between m1 and m2. This video is all over the place and not a derivation at all (the integration boundaries are just one of the many problems)