Dual scaling is good? Not necessarily. Yes, you can use multiple stats and buffers and they'll all work, but at the same time, they all buff you less So to get max potential on Chiori for example, you want to buff both her atk and def, which means you have to reserve two team slots to buff her vs a single scaling character

@@justapasserbyrandomperson9325 if they punish you for increasing a certain stat then it’s not really dual scaling

@@nyeonii Did you misunderstand something? I mean say that Chiori wasn't dual scaling, and needed only Def Then say her skill scaling was 100% of her def. Then use Gorou to buff her def, by say 300, and Bennett to buff Atk by say 500 Then she deals a flat 300 damage more per skill with Gorou and 0 extra damage with Bennett But since she's dual scaling, her skill multipliers are like 50% Atk + 50% Def Then using Gorou only buffs her skill damage by 150 damage per cast, and Bennett for 250 per cast = 400 damage extra per skill, but takes TWO slots to get this buff If you used Bennett and Sara, and Sara buffed atk by 300, you'd still get 150+250 dmg If she scaled on only atk, she'd gain 500 damage per skill with Bennett, and 300 with Sara = 800 dmg, which is double the damage buff she can get with two characters as a dual scaling character See the issue here? If she scaled with a single stat, buffers buff her more Same with stats, you need a good balance of both stats to get the most damage out of her, proportional to her skill multiplier (if it's 60% def + 40% atk, you want def:atk=60:40) Edit: Added Sara to the example to make it easier to understand Edit: You're right that dual scaling is way better than split scaling, but there are pros and cons to dual scaling over single scaling too, but I think the cons outweigh the pros Pros: -Can make use of multiple substats on artifacts -Can work with more characters -Can use more weapons/artifacts effectively Cons: -Hard to build optimally (for single scaling characters, you farm to get a single stat as high as possible, but you want exact ratios on dual scaling characters) -Buffs don't work as well

they are different true but not necessary good or bad. It could be complicated sometimes

Split scaling also isn't necessarily bad, if properly designed. They could make a character, for example, that deals Hu Tao levels of damage if built for attack, but offers a Zhongli level of shielding if built for hp and def. Probably the closest we get to this, though not designed that way, is Raiden, where built for EM, she's a strong hyperbloom trigger, but build her for her more normal stats, probably with C2, and now she's a decent direct damage dealer. Genshin, though, with all its substats and weapons that convert things and such, can't really fully utilize that. Meanwhile, dual scaling does have its downsides. Specifically, you tend to have a lower ceiling on damage, if the devs aim for a certain average level of damage, or else need better gear to hit the max ceiling, if the devs aim to have that capped at a certain point. Either way, dual scaling tends to result in lower numbers for highly invested people than a single stat scaling thing. But on the plus side, you generally do more for a lower invested person.

Ahh

Same. Just here to hear what eakes has to say.

You will have her dont worry. 😂

Yep same haha love Eakes ​@@jtglitch8054

I dunno why content creator can make such a simple mistake by not able to differentiate between split&dual scaling😅

Why not both? I got c1/r1 with 60 wishes f2p. First 10 pull I got chiori (no pity or guarantee) 40 more pulls c1. Weapon banner (7 Pity) first 10 pull got Uraku 74 wishes left over.

​@TjYau that's beyond lucky. With that number of wishes you could have gotten 0 5 stars

Yeah, for her just not good enough to justify pulling for her, especially when neuvilette is getting a rerun and I had to skip him to get c2 furina

same i got c1 with just 3rd pull + weapon@@TjYau mind u this is for my noelle account where i play as noelle. so any geo sub dps is godly

Yea it is 3% just to get the first 5 star on 10 pull for it to happen back to back again is a .09% chance so yes beyond lucky. Getting her in 40 pulls with no pity/guarantee is 12%. @@calvinwilson3617

We're not the same.

Nah I lost 50/50 to tighnari so ima summon for navia in her rerun

Dont listen to them follow your heart. I also love Chiori and i'm pissed about people dragging her down because they're so hyped for Arlechinno. They're sleeping on her that they dont realize how powerful she can be.

Summon for who YOU want to play ☺️

Definitely understand. I pulled for her just because of the slander that she’s getting, c2 r1 chiori here. She’s definitely fun to play.

I actuallly really like that team comp! I might play her with Zhongli, Lyney and Dehya if I want a break from mono geo. That sounds like a fun comp! Her play style is really enjoyable for me so any excuse to put her on more teams is good haha

So do I need her for my itto team? or should I pull for albeto on the chronicle banner

@@jeangrey2788 Think of Chiori as Albedo+12%. If you already have Albedo and your primos aren't limitless, then you can skip Chiori. If you have none of them, then Chiori is superior to Albedo now. Good luck with that info next year!

Do you really?

I had my hopes raised by Navia. She encourages playing with other characters. Her breaking free of the curse of Gorou is a huge win. Chiori though lowered them back down. She punishes you for not playing with the inferior geo constructs, while doing nothing to make those inferior constructs better. Her reliance on them make her a worse character. And for what? I mean, if playing geo, we're going to want 2 geos anyway, because of geo resonance, so there is NO NEED to incentive this further. And instead, we get forced into a smaller subset of geos. Furthermore, without the 2nd doll, she's at Albedo levels of damage. And that's a problem, because teams don't play Albedo because he is good. Teams use Albedo when they can't get what they really want, and he's the least bad option. And her C1 is problematic as well, in regards to this. It still leaves her tied to another geo, and this just makes her a less than desirable character, with a wasted constellation, because, again, geo resonance is all the incentive we need to run a second geo. Mind you, her numbers are enough to get the job done, and I'm having fun with mine, and, since damage numbers are probably the easiest thing to balance, all things considered, especially when elemental reactions aren't in play, even Hoyoverse can't screw that up too badly. But her kit takes geo in the wrong direction, doubling down on all the past mistakes that made geo trash to begin with.

@@Axterix13 her passive gives her like 30% additional geo damage. Its why i didnt bother with c1 if i want constructs anyway. Wish the buff was to all geo characters atleast.

Haha, they did the same thing with Gorou by ‘revolutionising geo’ by giving them a great support. Then didn’t add another geo that was tied to said revolution until Chiori, as Yun Jin and Navia actively avoid monogeo. I wouldn’t be surprised if we don’t get another geo character for a year or 2, and when they finally do release one, they’ll also come with some new take on a geo kit that’s unrelated to past attempts. They keep coming up with ideas, not developing them through additional characters that support that playstyle, and rinse/repeat. I don’t know what they expect at this point. Navia was a step forward, Chiori a step back. Players would have been so much more hyped and spent so much more money if she had been a Navia/crystallise support because that actually feels novel. To go from Furina to Navia to XIANYUN to Chiori is a tragic step backwards as the first 3 actually promoted new playstyle and team comps. Chiori is just a better Albedo when Albedo was already not a great addition to monogeo which most people can’t stand anyways. 💀

Pre farming is a thing ngl. Just doing the weekly bosses way before you even knew a character needed the mats. 😅

it's going to take a few weeks, he has to write a script for post narration, record it, then editing through 21 days will take some time!

@@Tac0belle ok i will there when he post video