Yep, that would appear to be a good decision.

you first

I fully support this idea! For being tech savvy, we’re a pathetically stupid species

@@user-jn7bh4qx1h the greenies on here certainly are

What about geo engineering . They are spraying us like bugs and I mean cloud seeding .

This video is cr*p. CO2 is not a problem and never has been. No display of graphs of ice cover area from prominent arctic research institutes. Yes, ice cover fluctuates over the years. The Ice Hockey stick graph turned about to be a fraud and institutes were shown to have massaged data to fulfill a political idea, not a scientific one.

THIS.

Ok. But everyone else?

F in the chat for getting caught in 4k

So 10 years later and your not dead yet......lol

You can't predict the future. Definitely not through data projections. However you can study the past and what that tells us is that there has been much bigger variations in climate throughout human history. In the time that homo sapiens have lived in Europe both Woolly mammoths and Hippopotamus have settled for prolong periods in England. And it's not like these were over vast time spans. Climate has shifted massively sometimes within a few decades.

@@liammiskell3522 There are decades long cycles. Plankton rises, carbon decreases, temperature getting colder. plankton start to die. More carbon in the air. Temperature rises.... This cycle is perfectly capable to handle us EXCEPT the excess carbon we put back into the cycle via mining it. We made changes which require hundreds or thousands of years to handle.

Try looking beyond your own vision of things, you will be amazed 🤯

Funny how the industrial revolution warming coincided with the end of the mini ice age. Almost as if that had some impact!

The sun’s energy ebbs and flows. Mankind can’t do shit about that. Move on and respect earth and husband it as any good farmer would. And stop preaching about utopian dreams.

yes

Thus is America atm

😂😂😊

@JohnToolan-oz6gx As many of us do 😞

Thanks for reminding me. I have to go eat.

And summers were breathable. I remember jogging outside

I think part of it is us doing dumb stuff but half of it I think is just the earth recovering from the last huge wipe out of mankind. All of the ice wasn’t there before and a lot of the water we see in big lakes and rivers weren’t always there. I think it’s just all going back to the way things were before. Which comes with weather changing and everything else

Because the planet will be fine. Humans not so much

Same here. I spent my teens and 20's in Michigan. We had feet of snow all winter. Thanksgiving and Christmas were white. The lake completely froze as far as you could see in winter and never got above 40 degrees in summer (we actually got to cool off when we went swimming). I just spent a year up there. We had barely a few inches of snow. It was not what Michigan considers cold. Christmas was rainy. The lake didn't freeze at all in winter and felt like bath water in late May. In the past, we didn't dare go swimming before July because the lake didn't completely thaw until the end of April.

Because every authority we were brought up to trust, has lied to us constantly about just about everything.

Yea, lovely voice 👌👌

The one on Epic Economist is even better

They should publish the name of the AI (ok lol I admit I thought it was a human)

@@tomholroyd7519 This is a real narrator, he has been around since like 2012. Look up space rip "when will time end". Same dude like 12 years ago.

@@tomholroyd7519 The narrator is Dick Rodstein, not an AI.

The voice of Epic Economist is much better

Dick Rodstein is the GoAT.

Way better than these AI voices being used on videos nowadays

Actually, I think the numbers may be closer to 40% Republican trolls, 50% Russian trolls and just 10% fossil fuel industry trolls, since the fossil fuel industry knows it has a stranglehold on the world economy, and they expect no decline in profits from climate mitigation efforts, and instead they expect higher profits, since they can simply charge more for their products if regulations increase their operating costs.

@@alienoverlordsnow1786 So what are you personally doing about it? Note that this alleged 'climate change' is so bad that millionaires like Obummer, Kerry, Gates, and others get jet around from mansion to mansion while telling us plebes that me paying $10/gal for gas and more expensive energy and giving that money to a government somehow solves the problem. The hottest decade last century was the 1930s. The silly signs saying glaciers were going to melt 4 years ago have been removed.

what does this have to do with Russia?

@@TabalugaDragon Well President Putin said about 4 or 5 years ago he would be glad when there is less ice in the North. It would be easier to exploit the resources. In fact there are a lot of countries in the north that are looking where their continental plate starts or ends. So they can determine who gets what. Russia also wants ice free routes for their shipping. Russia has thousands of miles of coastline from port to port. There are even military exercises in the North from both sides. NATO and Russia. i hope i could answer your question.

@@Newie67 Putin isn't Russia.

easily done

ANOTHER FAKE USER NAME THAT ENDS W 4 FUCCN NUMBERS. 😂😂😂😊😂 IM SOOOOO FKN RIGHT. 😊

Since C02 takes 800 years to be removed naturally from the atmosphere, your uncited -guesswork- scenario is highly unlikely.

@JohnToolan-oz6gx200 years isn’t a very good measuring stick to a planet that been around for billions. Look at the temp projections across earths lifetime and you’ll realize it’s pretty normal to earth natural cycle of heating up and cooling down. Humans aren’t the cause, we’re just speeding up the process.

@JohnToolan-oz6gx no, it’s completely natural regardless of humans being involved or not. My argument is, is people focus on the impact of humans while not understanding it’s happening regardless. We will never stop it, just delay it. The idea that we can stop it is goofy. Earth has had far worse rises and falls on its own with zero humans on the planet. Sure, we can do things to slow it down and I’m all for it. People just got to stop pretending it’s gonna fix anything long term.

There is no evidence the younger Dryas cooling was caused by an impact. That hypothesis was debunked.

You really haven't processed the idea of a whole continent of ice, have you. No, a hole you could stretch your hand across is not going to cause it to break up and melt. Give it some time and it will fill up with snow.

It's the warming planet, not holes in the ice.

FAKE AZZ USER NAME. ANY REGULAR NAME THAT ENDS W 4, AND 4 NUMBERS ONLY....IS A STOLEN OR FAKE USER NAME. NOW PROVE ME WRONG

Wow! Groovy non scientific bs man!

Ok thats rich coming from the there are infinite genders crowd

Troll ?? CHINA ??😊

well it says due to global warming, some changes will happen in 1000 years. but yea it was misleading because we are use to seeing changes in wild life and all in other videos that predict 1000 years from now.

Is that you, Chandler Bing?

@@isaackitone Never watched that show. But I was assuming this was going to be 1000 years "from now", not just generally.

Hey, (seansmith3058) You sir, are a BOT stole that name from someone or work for a foreign government to try and steal our info. We ALL KNOW PAL !! HAVE FUN !! 😉🖕

@JohnToolan-oz6gx The only way that I see, is to do CO2 removal from the atmosphere on a huge scale. It is possible if the nations of the world act together in a WW2 type of effort. But, what are the odds of that happening?? Global warming will have to be so advanced that it is obvious to everyone. CO2 will be at 500 ppm by 2050, and sea level will be rising by inches every year. Maybe then. BUT -- the loss of Greenland and WAIS will likely be unavoidable, meaning a minimum of 70 ft ocean rise. A lot of places still gone --- BUT - the real horror of a Global Anoxic Event may be averted. Do you want me to tell you about that???

Temperature rises cause CO2 rises. That's why we're seeing so many positive feedback mechanisms start to engage now - we put CO2 into the atmosphere and that started raising the temperature, the rising temperature released more CO2, the extra CO2 made it even hotter.. Don't worry, though. Once it gets above 1000ppm CO2 the whole population of humans will get too stupid to care about what we did to ourselves. CO2 is a brain poison!

@JohnToolan-oz6gx relax man. I am sure you know something about astronomical time&space scale. You, me and everything else inside our solar system is just a dream, a blip. Which, of course, is very sad. 😔

@JohnToolan-oz6gx ok, another way to see it: humankind will destroy itself and life on earth will recover. That asteroid 65 million years ago was a lot worst and life did recover. BTW, where were you and me 65 million years ago? Anyway, I live a responsible ecosystem life for my peace of mind. But I know that nothing will last forever.

@JohnToolan-oz6gx honest answer: no AND yes. No, for our own mental happiness we must protect nature. And yes: “So how long does Earth have until the planet is swallowed by the sun? Expected time of death: several billion years from now. But life on Earth will end much, much sooner than that. Earth will become unlivable for most organisms in about 1.3 billion years due to the sun's natural evolution, experts told Live Science.Dec 3, 2023”

That's how they get around dmca I think

NO. It's called BackGround Music for a bloody damn reason.

No!! I am so tired of loud music drowning out the narration.

@JohnToolan-oz6gx This was a massive event that involved the "fountains of the deep" and the "Windows of Heaven was opened". The first event was the ring of fire ripping and taring through the crust allowing separation of the continents and the other event was the asteroid strikes that according to Science "Killed the dinosaurs". All these events was the same single event that reconfigured the entire world as the weight shifted around the planet the earth tilts back on it's axis. This is why no sunlight hits the North Pole or South tricking Science into thinking an massive Ice Age lasted for billions of years when the ice age happened with this other events I have mentioned. Rapid Freezing. I could keep going. But I will let this all sink in.

The kilometres-thick layer of ice sitting up on land, however, is a completely different story. And it's the ice sheets floating on the ocean that are holding back the land ice and slowing down its slide into the sea.

you don't even know what solar maximum is

@@morningmadera solar maximum is the peak of an 11 year period that has been recorded since its discovery which is expected to be in full in 2025 there are scientists who report that the solar storm caused the beryl hurricane to get worse

Because it's influence is very small compared to the co2 effect. science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/what-is-the-suns-role-in-climate-change/

Because it isn't as relevant as you might think. science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/what-is-the-suns-role-in-climate-change/

@@danmarsh2011 Or the relation between sunspot activity and ice ages and heat waves.

Nobody said the ice caps were gonna melt in 20 years. You've been fed lies by science translators who have no idea what they're talking about.

Who said the ice caps should be melted by now? Please provide source for your outlandish strawman claims.

​@@ProfezorSnayp dude, there has been article after article from respected science journals over the passed few decades that said we should be in a climate catastrophe by now. When I was a kid in the 90s, we were told about greenhouse gases rising the ocean levels to the point Florida would be underwater by now. Just set your Google search history for anywhere in the early 2000s and youll see hundreds of articles saying the world should be doomed by now.

You haven't survived any of those things and science hasn't predicted any of them. None of those predictions appear in peer reviewed scientific papers. Spokesmen paid by Exxon and Koch claim they do, they are lying to protect petroleum profits at your expense. They thank you for your gullibility and loyalty. And their profits.

@@ProfezorSnayp He heard they were melting, and thought that meant the whole cap right away, like an ice cube that fell on the floor. And he's not alone. Yikes.

The cherry picked and fabricated evidence?

@@jackcarterog001 exactly. Their evidence is cherry picked. They conveniently leave out evidence that says the contrary. This is nothing more than a propaganda video.

​@@jackcarterog001Please point which evidence is cherrypicked and which is fabricated?

@@ProfezorSnayp anyone with a brain knows that this video promotes mostly one view. The video cites lots of fact, but also along with lots of possibilities/what if's/maybe's/theories/beliefs. Concentrates on/highlights/closeup graphics on areas dramatically melting --while negating to commit the same amount of time to areas that have actually had increased ice buildups. Nothing about countries that would actually benefit from warmer temperatures & changes in ocean currents, like Russia, Africa, Norway, Sweden, Afghanistan, and others. So, you want him to do all that work going back through the video, doing research and and then citing examples, just to prove/appease himself to you? He need not waste his time. He owes you no explanation of his response.

Just ignore the evidence? You mean, some of the evidence. There's a lot more evidence out there, not just the evidence you agree with. Stating facts while omitting other facts is not a fair and balanced video. Remember this-- >>>Evidence can contribute to conclusions. There is no blanket statement that evidence makes something true, or that evidence makes something false>>> Also, go back through the video and listen how many times he uses the words possibility/theory/maybe/what if/how plausible/might affect/could conclude/could threaten/could force/uncertainty/predict? The narrator knows that he can't speak in absolutes/because in many cases, there's no "definitive proof". That doesn't mean what he's saying is wrong--a lot is factual, but a lot is scientific guessing. There's a lot of other facts that were omitted. Obviously you can't include ALL of the facts in a 45 minute video, but it's not balanced. If you're going to cite theories and possibilities, but leave out other theories and possibilities because it doesn't fit your agenda, then you're not doing a proper service to your viewers.

Hail Satan!

Why is it propaganda?

So you watched a 46 min video that has been posted 19 min ago.

Did Fox News tell you what you know today ?

@@Craighetfield2024 no your wife's boyfriend did

​@@Mark-ib2stgood one. Classic middle school brained fox enjoyer.

Did fox news tell you what you were supposed to think today?

@@tswan137 I haven’t watched TV for 26 years, and my formal background is physics and mathematics. And you might say, but they are scientists as well. Ah, but I’m sure you’ve seen the effects of money on some people.

​@@iteerrex8166"Background in physics and mathematics" Is this you admitting last time you had anything to do with real science was in highschool?

@@ProfezorSnayp No, it was in kindergarten.

are you ok?

Bro that shit will finally fuck off thankfully

Good I hope not

no. we will destroy it

What if Penny met a dinosaur?

Not if we keep going on our present geopolitical course into full-blown world war.

Tell me ur a trump supporter without saying you're a trump supporter.....

We're you born stupid, or do u choose to be like this

​@@Craighetfield2024You're not going to fix the world environment with higher taxes clown

@@Craighetfield2024 What does he have to do it with it? Tell me you have TDS without telling me....lmao

@@Craighetfield2024Some liberals constantly preach about inclusion, and against bullying, or name-calling or wrongfully associating things/events --but as soon as it's something that they disagree with, then they somehow, don't have to abide by their own rules/beliefs/mantra. Such hypocrites. So if someone even remotely disagrees with some of the things said in this video, then they are a Trump supporter? I guess it just couldn't be possible that someone who is a Biden supporter could even possibly or remotely disagree with anything said in this video. Maybe you should think before you assume/belittle/tease/mock someone with your preconceived notion of what group they must belong to. Being a Trump supporter has no bearing on whether someone agrees or disagrees with certain aspects of this video.

Did your Mommy teach you the difference between weather and climate? No? Maybe she was too busy banging the weather man.

bye!

@@michaelhall2709 Did yours? They've spent the last 50 years going back and forth and back on what would happen. And either way, humans have no right to decide it should be 1850 forever. You are not special no matter what your pointless religion tells you. You do not get to lord over everything.

@@TessaBain Oh, really?! I’d be surprised if you could come up with anything less absurd than “global cooling” - which was never a thing in any peer-reviewed scientific journal, btw - but by all means, do tell, and show your work. (And perhaps then you can also explain to me why you would choose to spend even one instant of your time on this earth as an unpaid volunteer propagandist for fossil fuel billionaires.) As to “rights” - well, as is often the case it’s a matter of deciding whose rights take precedence. The ‘right’ of fossil fuel magnates to frack and drill their way to resources they had nothing to do with creating, and the ‘right’ of unpaid volunteers like yourself to strut and own the libs, or the right of the rest of us and our descendants to exist in a functional biosphere. It’s not looking so good for the rest of us at the moment, but we’ll see.

Infants and their tantrums...

Three reasons believing in a 6000 year old universe doesn't make sense: (1) The bible doesn't claim that the universe is 6000 years old. (2) The bible doesn't say it's contents can be used to calculate the age of the universe. (3) The bible itself doesn't claim it's contents are literal. That age was calculated by one man, James Escher, using his interpretation of biblical content. So "young earth creationists" place their trust in one man rather than centuries of evidence produced by millions of trained, educated scientists. Escher vs. All of Science. Smart.

​@@John-gq7vtyou are wasting your time on these kind of people

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 cool story bro!😂😂😂😂😂😂

With that kind of thinking, we would still be in the dark ages. Or do you accept the outcome of research only when it suits your world view?

4 and half billion years stupid

Bye bye, you won't be missed.

Can't handle the truth?

good riddance. we don't need antivax wachos

Your type of people perplex me. Why announce you’re unsubscribing? Just go, quietly. You’re not special or important.

Because it presents data, facts and science on an issue you know only from FoxNews?

⁠@@ProfezorSnayp excuse me, but it doesn't present ALL of the data/facts/truth. And because someone disagrees, then we must be a FoxNews fanatic, and let me guess - also a Trump supporter? So if you watch, strictly CNN and MSNBC, you're going to completely agree with everything said in this video? What does that say about you, to have a preconceived notion of who someone is, when you know absolutely nothing about them, except for a short reply on KZfaq? How do you know this person is not a liberal Democrat? You do realize there are gay Republicans, black conservatives, and Democrats who are without question, fully against abortion? Some people can be so arrogant, condescending and self-righteous.