In America they’re all are useful....as political propaganda and fear mongering tools.

Do you factor in geoengineering weather weapons? Like the H.A.A.R.P. facility in Alaska? Or cloud seeding like China did with the Beijing Olympics so it wouldnt rain during the games, it caused flooding elsewhere though. Cloud seeding has been in use since the 1940's. Weather weapons are real as there is a UN treaty in effect since 1978 banning there use on other nations. Are these things what throw your climate models so far out and the reason for the extreme weather conditions? It would fit the WEF climate change agenda bs and the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development. To the Elite globalists our population is not Sustainable. The WEF slogan is - 2030 You Will Own Nothing and You Will be Happy. Its war on the world population starting with the West. The aim of the extreme weather is to destroy the food crops worldwide.

Yet the 'chicken little' woke are using models to make their claim of a climate emergency, these alarmists need to be shut down. It is ridiculous how they claim Co and CO2 would be a problem to plant life, when palio records compare the current as being low, therefore having more carbon would offset this cooling trend of a solar minimum.

Environment Canada's climate model, was foisted on an unsuspecting public in 1999. They gave 7 dire warnings about climate catastrophes that would occur in the next twenty years. They included crop failures in the prairies, dangerously high sea levels and a huge spike in urban heat-related fatalities. Not one of their predictions happened....not one. I've yet to see one that was accurate.

@@Martin.Wilson There is one, crop failures, caused by artificially high diesel prices and restrictions in fertilizer usage.

Absolutely. People searching for truth without a political motive is refreshing.

Don’t be fooled by this lack of knowledge and research the wet weather is caused by the volcano erupting in Tonga in January of this year, you can find information about it on KZfaq

Sandy, that’s because people hear what they want to hear, and draw conclusions based on what they remember- not what was actually presented. As a result, govt forgoes all the details and gives us just what the point is that should be remembered. (By the way, you likely remember this is also what the religious leadership did in the “dark ages” as well.)

@@jamespendleton4802 +

Is it refreshing for someone to describe predictable cycles of climate change that have been functioning in essentially the same manner, with slight fluctuations any reasonable person would expect to occur in any natural phenomenon ... cyclical weather patterns, Polar bear numbers {significantly larger in recent years, btw, but merely a continuance of a steady, persistent, & confounding INCREASE in the world's population of large arctic mammals from the Orsine family, I haven't heard much about Grissly Bear numbers, or the smaller Black, & Brown bear species commonly found throughout the woodlands, & the many prominant mountain ranges that dominate the landscape of the US, & Canada, but you probably won't hear much about any bear species suffering from the catastrophic effects of refrigeration, home cooked meals, clean clothes, long distance travel, making roughly 1/3 of the US, & Nearly all of Canada capable of supporting human habitation, & don't forget nearly all agricultural production, & large scale food processing {think grape nuts, beer, & tortillas of significant scale, with a few notable exceptions, I-RONICALLY ENOUGH, meat, dairy, eggs: cattle-hogs-chicken

Exactly-spot on information.

They never comment on volcanoes because they cannot get volcanoes' money by charging them with CO2 taxes.

Back in the nineties they pointed to Mt. Pinatubo! See! It’s a volcano not us! Humans would never destroy their own nest due to greed and shortsightedness. It’s an argument for the denying faithful.

@@AlexYounger Greed has no guardrails. The elite may already know a new oil free technology/powergrid is in the pipeline,-ha, but the dominoes for self-destruction are already starting to fall.

@@AlexYounger Why did Honga blow when it did, might it just be a feed back mechanism? Oh no, it does not result in runaway warming for the heating cult faithful. You see we can do just the same as what you do.

Very interesting to hear about your weather in Australia. I had no ideas that floods were an issue for your continent as I thought of Australia as a fairly dry continent. Thanks for your comment!

Love your channel. Super interesting content and your presentation style & voice are excellent. Glad I found you. Keep it up, your information is fascinating!

@@keng7758 Various parts of Australia flood regularly. Most are in areas that have very few people so do not make the news as no infrastructure is destroyed and no deaths result. Yet as soon as the East gets a flood all the climate change nutters come out stating it is proof of catastrophic Climate Change. Sadly, a simple search of historical records would inform them that such floods are normal and have occurred for all recorded time in Australia usually occurring every 50 years or so. Sometimes they are late coming and sometimes early but they are normal and nothing to do with GW/CC. One of the reasons the models are wrong is that they are not adjusted for local weather patterns nor updated for actual data since modelling began. They still use data which failed to manifest over the last 40-50 years and therefore are based on false premise. As an example they are based on a constant annual rise in temperatures yet all actual data over the last 50 years shows the annual change indeed changes each and every year. This means if the models are not adjusted each and every year the predictions are based on patently False data and should not even be looked at as a guide to future weather. Yet governments worldwide spend Billions/Trillions based on this inaccurate and false modelling. They tell us to follow the science but are themselves NOT following science but agendas. Point it out and unfortunately you get labelled a denier etc by all the cultists following the GW/CC cults. If you print poor science then expect that science to be challenged and proven incorrect.

@@saintsone7877 That unfortunately is totally incorrect. Australia's annual average temperature has increased over the last 100 years by 1.44 degrees C. Some years (like La Nina years) buck the trend. Average rainfall has been roughly the same but the the rainfall distribution has shifted markedly. The North being generally wetter and the South increasingly drier. Again individual years, particularly La Nina ones, buck the trend. Now, the models have their limitations in predicting what and exactly where the impacts of global warming will be. What they haven't got wrong is that global warming continues to trend upwards and that the result is an increase in intensity of severe weather events. That's why records continue to be broken. This video did not suggest that climate change isn't a serious issue as you are making out. Models have been updated with improved scientific knowledge and actual measurements, I've been following the subject since the mid 90's, but it's an ongoing process.

@@tonyclayton6975 Tony, those increases you mention. Is that before or after they amended temperatures? You were aware that approximately 2000 temperatures per year are amended downwards on temperatures from 1900-2000 by an average 2-4C and please don't respond and say they do not as it is easy to verify(if you are willing to do the legwork). Go to the BOM records and input temps for 1900-1970 for any days you choose. Then go to that town/cities local library and look at historical newspapers temps for the corresponding days and viola, the Bom temps are lower for those days than the newspapers which are the actual temps for that day. Sad to think you say you have followed it since the 1990's yet are unaware of this falsification of historical records by the BOM. You possibly also do not remember the climate scientist who caught the BOM falsifying temps in Canberra during winter. The ABC was showing the temps at a certain spot in Canberra whilst a scientist had temp equipment on that mountain area showing much colder temperatures. She rang the ABC and informed them their semaphored temps were wrong and lo and behold shortly after they disappeared from screen with apologies and the excuse gauges etc were malfunctioning. A week later she repeated the process and caught them with wrong temps again. Just shows the lengths they go to to falsify data. Watch your smartphone closely daily and you can see the temps vary between devices by up to 2C daily yet annual changes are in thousands of a degree over the last 10 years. And the average temperature of the earth is not very warm at all is it Tony? Yet we get told a 2-5C increase will be a catastrophe when anyone with intelligence knows this is poppycock. Far more people die in cold temperatures today than in warm temperatures around the world and if one compares the numbers of people dying due to weather related incidents 100 years ago and today it was far higher 100 years ago than today. CC/GW is a scam pure and simple. Where are the 500+million climate refugees that was supposed to begin around year 2000 Tony? That is what they predicted back in the 1970's/80's. Is the Sydney Opera House going to be under water by 2025 Tony due to sea level rising? Now they claim it will be by 2075. These are the people you call experts yet every prediction they have made since the 1970's where they gave an event and date has failed to materialise. NOT 1 has materialised Tony out of hundreds. That says it all Tony. But you can go on believing your doomsdayers nonsense. Oh, and by the way Tony, they told us 20+ years ago Australia would NEVER EVER get rains like in the past. Each and EVERY year would become drier and DRIER until eventually we ran out of water in our dams etc. Yet here we are Tony 20 or so years later getting record rainfall and dams overflowing. Just another prediction they got totally incorrect yet now they have the temerity to say it is CC/GW that is causing the rains they said would never come again due to CC/GW. The goalposts change everytime their data proves to be false Tony. That is not science my friend but cultism.

The accuracy of any good model depends on including as many variables as possible. In most climate models, the include between 4 and 6 variables when they should be basing them on 15-16 different criteria. The unfortunate truth is that they tend eliminate the variables that don't result in the desired outcome, which clearly undermines the scientific method at it's foundation.

@@Martin.Wilson You have a GREAT start but since I am not a scientist of any caliber, could there be even MORE criteria or variables to be considered?? PEACE!

@ Jacek.... GREAT COMMENT! Maybe somebody had better get the quantum computers working on this instead of asking, WHY IS THERE AIR?" ( or other irrelevant nonsense) PEACE!

@@jtc1947 Absolutely. The more comprehensive the model is, in terms of variables, the more accurate it is likely to be. One of the most important criterion that is often overlooked are the Milankovitch cycles which can cause variations of up to 25 percent in the amount of incoming solar radiation at Earth’s mid-latitudes. In fact, the Milankovitch cycles were crucial in triggering the numerous ice ages throughout Earth's geological past.

@@Martin.Wilson I was amazed about the precession (?? Is that the correct term? concerning the difference in the % of how the EARTH is actually facing the sun. Seems that Our planet has quite a bit of wobble and the "orientation" can vary so much. To the point that 20 K years ago the SAHARA was a lush paradise.

This!!!! 100000% "well they have all been wrong 100% before... But I'm sure they will be right going forward sooo we will just keep pushing the disaster narrative to create more funding and and of course control"

Climate models may be good for some things like predicting regional shifts in temperature and moisture, but they have significant simplifications when it comes to the specifics of modeling the GHG effect as it warms the Earth. They get their GHG temperature predictions very wrong. We are getting interest from people trying a REVOLUTIONARY free Excel-based calculator that can be downloaded anonymously from our website. It embeds detailed physics equations and absorption data tables for the greenhouse gas effect so the user can precisely obtain the change in Earth’s temperature when GHG levels change for any change analysis scenario the user wants to solve. It simultaneously solves the equations for any mixture change of CO2, CH4, N2O and H2O. People who’ve tried it are enthused because the good-news results are significantly less pessimistic than the popular belief in the media.

GIGO is real!

Especially if both are largely incomplete models to begin with... 'but mah funding!'

@@undernetjack follow the $cience!

@@Eyes0penNoFear kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hLOmnZCIqZ_JcYk.html

@@mrmustangman as many times as I've used that phrase, you're the first person to link me to a video like that 😂😂😂 Well played 👏

This is how we run across places where there's been buildings and then the people disappear but there's really not that many bones. Where did they go? They got up and moved because the weather conditions were unfavorable for their continued existence. Well that and wars, plagues and volcanoes. We live on a living planet it changes on a regular basis...we're just learning how to see it on a worldwide view.

Because they don't teach history anymore. I was laughing when everyone started screaming about the polar ice caps and permafrost were melting, and then reports of boats, villages, people found in them.... permafrost is not so permanent.... that means there was not ice there at one point. History shows every 500 years the earth goes hot or cold, every 1000 years it's more extreme. It's always changing, we only In the last 40 years have been able to see it world wide.

Exactly. The climate is changing all the time, always has. It's shear arrogance to think we can create models that predict the outcomes of a nonlinear chaotic system. There's a lot of evidence that the world is going to cool, the best we can do is watch and learn... and adapt to the changes as we've always done 🤔

@@martinbaker613 What gets me is the people that think that they can actually control nature...it's such a joke...we can't even predict it accurately let alone control it!

And we've had CO2 increase to 400ppm before...except it happened over hundreds of thousands of years not over 200 years since the industrial revolution...get real people, this climate change isn't just "weather" doing its thing...this sudden increase gives nature (and us) no time to adapt...

Yep and they don't work when they go backwards ie there are 4 interglacial warm periods in the last million years that were much warmer than our current interglacial warm period but that they can't predict these with the models because the co2 levels were around 250ppm, low co2 with high temperatures totally buggers up the models.

Million years? 😂 that's a lie Science recently found out we have a young earth. Look it up! Secular science tries hard to make it millions when it's not, it's only thousands of years old

Look in your mirror for garbage and understanding I see. For the past 50 years the climate models, within statistical error bounds, have predicted warming and the measurements each and every year show WARMING. You are either just a God Damned LIAR or a bot, which?

This seems like a good observation.

Definitely. That bad boy launched billions of tons of water into the atmosphere.

@@Sc50001 Have look at this I am not saying it is a fact but a good possibility. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e8Ckha6Tucq1hqs.html

Thanks rob, I agree with that. I live in Auckland and we've been experiencing until very recently cool winds from the south that were lowering the daytime temperature noticeably two or three degrees C. I'd read in one of digital science mags that the Tongan submarine volcano had thrown up enough sea water to increase the global amount of water vapour in the atmosphere (stratosphere?) by around 10 percent. That's quite a lot! Additionally, it had also thrown up a fair amount of sulphur dioxide and ash. "The plume was composed primarily of water with some ash and sulfur dioxide mixed in, said atmospheric scientist Simon Proud, lead author of the research published in the journal Science. Eruptions from land-based volcanoes tend to have more ash and sulfur dioxide and less water" - Reuters. The water vapour will fall out quickly enough, and the sulphur and ash is expected to cool global temperature for maybe 3 or 4 years starting in the southern hemisphere, and already crossing the equator to the northern. Research is going on to confirm this or otherwise. Meanwhile anthropogenic GHG emissions and climate heating with the ensuing chaos continue unabated. It's as though an umbrella has been temporarily put up to reflect some of the incoming solar radiation, but we'll see soon enough I guess.

@@brianwheeldon4643 Mmm, interesting. Thanks for the post.

I too remember that coming ice age. It was a wee bit of a 'thing' at the time, but with no world-wide-web it wasn't open to everybody - and only the cognoscenti were interested anyway (the rest of us read the girlie magazines. I did too, but I actually read both).

Meteorologists work with short term localized weather. Climatologists are scientists who work with long term cycles and trends. Listening to meteorologists about coming ice ages is like listening to your step brother who drives a tank for the army about his predictions on Russia's longer term strategic goals in Europe and then saying the military doesn't know anything when he's wrong. The consensus among climatologists for the past 100 years has been that the earth is warming regardless of what local meteorologists or news reporters said.

@@DRAT311 I thought climatology was a field within meteorology, kind of like how aerospace and nuclear engineering are fields within mechanical and/or electrical engineering. (But don't tell aerospace or nuclear engineers that!) Regardless, I was really just taking shots at the ever-increasing hyperbole coming from The Weather Channel.

​@@DRAT311 My issue is that they are probably lying through their teeth. It not that I don't believe in Climate change. I believe in Climate Change. I just think it's not going along with their models and they can't figure out why. I think it's warming MUCH slower than they believe. CO2 is a green house gas. And we pump a couple billion tons of it into the atmosphere on an annual basis. But there should have been Congressional hearings and funding cut the second it became knowledge that NOAA was purposefully putting thermometers in black top parking lots to inflate the data.

When I was a child, the nightly weather forecast said we were going to have a dusting of snow. When I woke up in the morning and looked outside, there was almost 2 feet on the ground. 😅

Check out the forcast videos from Eric Snodgras. He's a meteorologist with Nutrian Ag Solutions {also the YT channel name} and is very good at explaining things and helping teach people to understand how the patterns work. You really begin to understand how weather forecasting works.

Ask mathematicians about modeling a chaotic system like the climat. Sensitivity of any chaotic system to parameters adjustements is huge. In any case, we'll have confirmation/denial for models predictions in years 2050 or 2100, so be patient.

the Tongan volcano add the la Nina sam and wa dipole..... this is the reason its already been put out there.....this is alarmism... el Nino is drought la Nina wet..... ask the black fellas like us we taught the government about this in the 50s.....

I see the problem. Climate models are created for political reason NOT science. Who pay the money get to decide what factor to use, what factor to ignore and therefore what result it will get.

cck. Exactly, follow the money you'll find the science

YUP! ITS ALL 'CYCLICAL' IS MY BELIEF. LIFE IS NOTHING BUT CYCLES. ROUND AND ROUND WE GO!! I WILL NEVER BUY " CLIMATE CHANGE" ALL BULLS💩💩T.....LITERALLY...AND GAS!!!! TOOT- TOOT!!😂

And we're still not out of the current ice age.

Yep, and according to some esoteric circles, this is a normal cycle that happened before and will happen again. It should be on us in around ten-twelve years or so. However, it is predicted as not to be catastrophic, but just dammed cold, very cold in fact, and for two or three generations. Get your fireplaces and firewood ready, electricity networks will fail on the northern parts of the Northern Hemisphere!

@ ERIC.... A long time ago when I was STILL in school, there seemed to be the idea that ANOTHER ice age or Mini-ICE age might be in our future? Maybe people should lay in their long johns??

Did they really need to look at plankton layers, did you say? Was it somewhere around 35 years ago ... this scouring the 2 largest oceans on the planet, but I guess they're boring down through the sea bed. getting some nice historic depositions of plankton over time, most recent layers are on top, & the lower you go ... seems pretty clear, huh Eric ... 5 yesrs ago, plankton dies, floats ever so slowly, lands on the sea floor, plankton keeps floating, barely moving, but "DOWN ... goes ... Frazier! ... sorry it's a boxing fight call. Probably the most famous heavey weight championship bout, between Fazier, & Muhamed Ali ... for the belt, Ali won I'm pretty sure, to either maintain his, "Heavy Weight Champion of the Woorold!" title, or win it back, but I don't think Frazier ever did Beat Ali, not while he was still the Champ, George Frazier was a punishing puncher, & dominated virtually all of the early rounds, til about 8, & round 9, Ali wasn't winning those rounds either, but Frazier was starting to wear himself out from aggressively going on offense for the first half, & throwing so many punches, Ali didn't block many of them either, except with gut, & his head. A few times Ali did bob, & weave to avoid a couple of hard rights that could have knocked him clean out, so he did what he needed to do to keep going, & keep fightin' but Eric I'll bring this back to these less than honest, & misguided, or terribly misinformed "activists" we should call them, because they are always DEMANDING their government take this action NOW! or Net Zero by 2030! You all have to STOP using fossil fuels by 2025, or we'll glue ourselves to the pavement of a major Interstate, at least 4 lanes of Highway, maybe we'll block traffic going in both directions so that would be 4 ... 5 .. 6, hmm ... So is 8 after 6, or did I count wrong? I know I was told to threaten you horrible evil people ... who just want to kill grandma ... with you gas heaters in the Winter, & Grandma's cleaner burning natural gas for cooking, & heating, & hot water for washing her clothes, & doing the dishes, and shouldn't she get hot shower once, or twice a week weeknext month! action, & these climate hysteria of the out was very close in the fight I spoofed the great Howard Cossel's inflection, quick cadence & nasal whinedown like the biggest snowfall in hidtory top layer the older the layers of plankton laid down

What better way to show a warming trend?

Many studies I've seen over the years actually start with geological records dating back thousands of years and longer. Perhaps we need to read more.

It was not until the 1980s that warming due to CO2 began to become evident in the instrumental temperature above the background of natural forcings. That was predicted by Hansen et al in a 1981 paper. Their model has stood the test of time. pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_ha04600x.pdf Other data, such as sea level goes back longer. climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/

@@pshehan1 Whatever. As if the world was supposed to stay the same temperate forever. Hahaha. No emergency, just a cutback on some chemical uses. Which is why the ozone layer is reportedly 'healing'. All this 'Climate Change' hysteria is just political. An attempt to push the free world into Socialism / Communism.

@@GB-gf3dm The temperature was not going to stay the same forever. That is no reason for humans to change it now. The climate had been relatively stable for the 12,000 years of the holocene when agriculture, human populations, infrastructure including coastal cities developed where they are until the industrial revolution began adding CO2 to the atmosphere, raising it by 50% so far, from 280 to 420 ppm, and increasing the temperature by 1.3 C so far and currently rising at an accelerating rate of 0.2 C per decade. The same science which correctly predicted that predicts the disastrtous consequences if that continues. That is not politics. It is fact.

In the uk this summer we hit 40.5 c totally unnatural 😒

Definitely went over 40 where I live in SEQ both last summer and the one before, hit 33 here just last week and we are not even in summer yet. The rain has been good I hope it stays

Just a note, whilst Sydney received record year of rain, Easter Australia and Australia overall had more rain over the three years 1973, 74 & 75. 2050, 2056, 2010 & 2011 were also much wetter. Just because the biggest city experiences unusual high rainfall, the past 3 years are by no means out of the norm for Australia. Feel free to get all the data directly from BOM site

Give me the cooler, wetter Aussie summer every time.

The dams that they didnt empty the top water off before the rains and caused the Brisbane floods as well as elsewhere you mean?

I am in NE Tassie, and I agree with your thoughts. The current weather patterns seen almost identical to the weather during the seventies, when it was almost too wet here to farm. Definitely seems that we still have a lot to learn about the Earth's weather.

Let's face it we don't have a friggen clue how long any patterns are and as they are only one part of what makes up climate chaos ... but those who "have the science " can pretty much make anything up and change their minds as fast as the weather, while claiming "that's what I've been saying all along". The truth is, we are babes in the woods, like it or not.

like a tsunami. tide goes away befor all the water comes in. 2019 the tide was out. you guys wanted rain. 2019 convinced the most of you that man made climate change put yenz in a severe droubt. well so you got all the rain you ever wanted now lol.. whats thats saying?? careful whatchu wish for. seems to be a real kick in the nuts, doesn't it?

Pretty much an identical story for me on the NSW/ Vic border. Everything is sodden. The river systems are well and truely over full. Like the poem says “a land of droughts and flooding rains”.

Plant trees

Don't forget to put atmospheric physics, water wapor, clouds in your models.

I was just about to post a comment in a similar vein, but saw your comment, which by the way has top billing at the moment for this video. Apart from some flooding and slips, I think that for the last two years the weather here in NZ has been quite good because overall it has probably been good for agriculture and has kept the hydro lakes full.

Would hemp also have this problem?

@@Roger_Gadd I worry as similarly here in Europe, winters have been just cold enough to sustain Alpine economies. We may experience a very steep change if El Nino comes back with very warm winter in Europe and reading your comments, very dry summer in your region.

@@alexdubois6585 Yes, the El Nino weather pattern is a problem for NZ. As Pete mentioned, it was prevalent in the 1980s. I did a bit of unrelated analysis a few days ago, and interestingly, NZ farm animal biomass may have peaked in about 1986, and NZ farm animal methane emissions certainly peaked that year. But I suspect that the complete removal of farm subsidies here then may be what ultimately led to our reduction in farm methane emissions.

@@Roger_Gadd On the animal biomass, it's interesting that you say it peaked around 1986, because in Canterbury a lot of those mixed sheep/cropping farms which required irrigation in the 80s, but not so much now, have mostly become dairy farms. With the more regular summer rainfall we're now getting (plus irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer) those farms have way more animal biomass than back then....I guess one region doesn't represent the whole country.

Practically all of the river systems have been dammed already , with consequential environmental problems, some of those massive problems.

Lake Eyre is a hundred feet below sea level - plenty of room for storage.

@@1EARTHARCHITECT . That's basically a gigantic evaporation pond, being a salt lake, which is only a few feet deep. & It's in the middle of nowhere. That's a crazy idea.

@@1EARTHARCHITECT Lake air is only 15 m below sea level

@@1EARTHARCHITECT and lake eyre has a 2 meter per year evaporation rate, so perhaps not a good place to store water for later use.

And volcanoes are movers of climate - that much we know... and we cannot control. Watch the documentary "536 AD: The Worst Year In History?" on KZfaq.. you may realize that the climate's movers are beyond our control.

Things that occur outside of these events also come into play, such as the Tonga volcano that erupted, that is literally where El Nino or la nina sits off the east coast of Oz. The heat and sulphur etc was mostly in the ocean which did alter la nina and el nino plus the Antarctic southern dipole so much this caused the flooding.

All our energy is from the Sun.on Earth weather is from it.Heat below the crust is doing what it has todo.The Sun getting too much energy from the ( Cosmic Cloud);stated byNASA we are passing through. Sun gets too much, ,we get too much. Work it out,we are cooking off our ice everywhere on Earth. Melting perma frost (/from below) methane out of melt and volcanic pressure relief world wide.

I think it was Krakatoa that cause the next year to not have a summer, and then kicked off The Black Plague.

The Tonga eruption is the reason the SAM has been driven persistently positive allowing wacky easterly winds to dump Pacific moisture across the east coast and east inlands; but generally speaking there's more heat in the entire system, warmer oceans increasing rains and under mining Antarctic ice-sheets allowing the great Antarctic glaciers to collapse a hundred times faster than they've been able to do during the past three million years.

a great video on the Tongan eruption in January 22 and the effect it might of had on the resent flooding in Victoria this year. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e8Ckha6Tucq1hqs.html

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e8Ckha6Tucq1hqs.html

well, that was only this year and as mentioned in the video the trend has been going on longer...

the term 100 year flood is a planing term that has been abused

That is the first thing I ask when looking for a place to live. "Does it flood here?" That simple question saves a lot of headache later. I live in the PH BTW where flooding is the rule and not the exception.

@@peterritchie5593 Well aware if that. Just because you just had one it does not mean you'll not have another one for 100 years. Unfortunately I cannot think of a better way to express what it tries to denote.

Too bad Australia doesn’t have more dams. Weren’t there proposals to build some back in the day?

@@rogerknights857 We already have a lot of dams especially in the SNowy Mountains where the water is used for hydro, pumped hydro storage and irrigation. One problem is the scheme is jointly owned by Victoria and NSW. Add to that the conflict between water for irrigation and power generation and it's a real hot potato. That scheme is being upgraded to handle more pumped hydro energy storage. For the rest Sydney has a few dams and reservoirs to supply domestic water and there has been discussion about increasing the height of the spillway of one of them. The problem with anything West of Great Dividing Range is the country is very flat. There are some dams and weirs. Sure more would be good but we're really short of suitable locations.

Thanks Ollie

I think I saw a fish!!

If you're following your comment here then read this which explains video topic and is simple (faster big winds system. Something big with ENSO started 1995 but (this is important) I've not come across information whether it ended with 2015/16 big El Nino or whether it's stil existing as a long-term background trend. It's the warming tropical Atlantic Ocean surface as I've been informing in a comment since 2014. It's a classic power amplifier because tropical Pacific Ocean is 3.6 times as wide as tropical Atlantic Ocean. ---------------- It started 1995. By 2012 the tropical Pacific Ocean easterly wind was a massive 30% (1 metre / second) stronger than pre-1995. I've not yet found post 2012-2021 wind stress plot so I don't know whether the big 2015/16 El Nino was the end of the massive 17 to 20 year Trade Wind surge. ENSO is an utterly-vast feature of Earth's surface-air. ---------------- Quote: "Atlantic warming turbocharges Pacific trade winds Date:August 3, 2014 Source:University of New South Wales. New research has found rapid warming of the Atlantic Ocean, likely caused by global warming, has turbocharged Pacific Equatorial trade winds. Currently the winds are at a level never before seen on observed records, which extend back to the 1860s. The increase in these winds has caused eastern tropical Pacific cooling, amplified the Californian drought, accelerated sea level rise three times faster than the global average in the Western Pacific and has slowed the rise of global average surface temperatures since 2001. It may even be responsible for making El Nino events less common over the past decade due to its cooling impact on ocean surface temperatures in the eastern Pacific. "We were surprised to find the main cause of the Pacific climate trends of the past 20 years had its origin in the Atlantic Ocean," said co-lead author Dr Shayne McGregor from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (ARCCSS) atthe University of New South Wales." ---------------- Quote: "The record-breaking increase in Pacific Equatorial trade winds over the past 20 years had, until now, baffled researchers. Originally, this trade wind intensification was considered to be a response to Pacific decadal variability. However, the strength of the winds was much more powerful than expected due to the changes in Pacific sea surface temperature. Another riddle was that previous research indicated that under global warming scenarios Pacific Equatorial Trade winds would slow down over the coming century. The solution was found in the rapid warming of the Atlantic Ocean basin, which has created unexpected pressure differences between the Atlantic and Pacific. This has produced wind anomalies that have given Pacific Equatorial trade winds an additional big push. “The rapid warming of the Atlantic Ocean created high pressure zones in the upper atmosphere over that basin and low pressure zones close to the surface of the ocean,” says Professor Axel Timmermann, co-lead and corresponding author from the University of Hawaii. “The rising air parcels, over the Atlantic eventually sink over the eastern tropical Pacific, thus creating higher surface pressure there. The enormous pressure see-saw with high pressure in the Pacific and low pressure in the Atlantic gave the Pacific trade winds an extra kick, amplifying their strength. It’s like giving a playground roundabout an extra push as it spins past.” Many climate models appear to have underestimated the magnitude of the coupling between the two ocean basins, which may explain why they struggled to produce the recent increase in Pacific Equatorial trade wind trends. While active, the stronger Equatorial trade winds have caused far greater overturning of ocean water in the West Pacific, pushing more atmospheric heat into the ocean, as shown by co-author and ARCCSS Chief Investigator Professor Matthew England earlier this year. This increased overturning appears to explain much of the recent slowdown in the rise of global average surface temperatures. Importantly, the researchers don’t expect the current pressure difference between the two ocean basins to last. When it does end, they expect to see some rapid changes, including a sudden acceleration of global average surface temperatures. “It will be difficult to predict when the Pacific cooling trend and its contribution to the global hiatus in surface temperatures will come to an end,” Professor England says." ---------------- Recent intensification of wind-driven circulation in the Pacific and the ongoing warming hiatus Nature Climate Change 4, 222-227 (2014) doi:10.1038/nclimate2106 Received 11 September 2013 Accepted 18 December 2013 Published online 09 February 2014 Corrected online 14 February 2014 Matthew H. England, Shayne McGregor, Paul Spence, Gerald A. Meehl, Axel Timmermann, Wenju Cai, Alex Sen Gupta, Michael J. McPhaden, Ariaan Purich & Agus Santoso "Here we show that a pronounced strengthening in Pacific trade winds over the past two decades-unprecedented in observations/reanalysis data and not captured by climate models-is sufficient to account for the cooling of the tropical Pacific and a substantial slowdown in surface warming through increased subsurface ocean heat uptake."

Title "Are the climate models wrong??". In the case of this topic definitely yes per this published mainstream science following. Find quote "Many climate models appear to have underestimated the magnitude of the coupling between the two ocean basins" below because that's entirely what this video is about. --------- Quote: "Atlantic warming turbocharges Pacific trade winds Date:August 3, 2014 Source:University of New South Wales. New research has found rapid warming of the Atlantic Ocean, likely caused by global warming, has turbocharged Pacific Equatorial trade winds. Currently the winds are at a level never before seen on observed records, which extend back to the 1860s. The increase in these winds has caused eastern tropical Pacific cooling, amplified the Californian drought, accelerated sea level rise three times faster than the global average in the Western Pacific and has slowed the rise of global average surface temperatures since 2001. It may even be responsible for making El Nino events less common over the past decade due to its cooling impact on ocean surface temperatures in the eastern Pacific. "We were surprised to find the main cause of the Pacific climate trends of the past 20 years had its origin in the Atlantic Ocean," said co-lead author Dr Shayne McGregor from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (ARCCSS) atthe University of New South Wales." ---------------- Quote: "The record-breaking increase in Pacific Equatorial trade winds over the past 20 years had, until now, baffled researchers. Originally, this trade wind intensification was considered to be a response to Pacific decadal variability. However, the strength of the winds was much more powerful than expected due to the changes in Pacific sea surface temperature. Another riddle was that previous research indicated that under global warming scenarios Pacific Equatorial Trade winds would slow down over the coming century. The solution was found in the rapid warming of the Atlantic Ocean basin, which has created unexpected pressure differences between the Atlantic and Pacific. This has produced wind anomalies that have given Pacific Equatorial trade winds an additional big push. “The rapid warming of the Atlantic Ocean created high pressure zones in the upper atmosphere over that basin and low pressure zones close to the surface of the ocean,” says Professor Axel Timmermann, co-lead and corresponding author from the University of Hawaii. “The rising air parcels, over the Atlantic eventually sink over the eastern tropical Pacific, thus creating higher surface pressure there. The enormous pressure see-saw with high pressure in the Pacific and low pressure in the Atlantic gave the Pacific trade winds an extra kick, amplifying their strength. It’s like giving a playground roundabout an extra push as it spins past.” Many climate models appear to have underestimated the magnitude of the coupling between the two ocean basins, which may explain why they struggled to produce the recent increase in Pacific Equatorial trade wind trends. While active, the stronger Equatorial trade winds have caused far greater overturning of ocean water in the West Pacific, pushing more atmospheric heat into the ocean, as shown by co-author and ARCCSS Chief Investigator Professor Matthew England earlier this year. This increased overturning appears to explain much of the recent slowdown in the rise of global average surface temperatures. Importantly, the researchers don’t expect the current pressure difference between the two ocean basins to last. When it does end, they expect to see some rapid changes, including a sudden acceleration of global average surface temperatures. “It will be difficult to predict when the Pacific cooling trend and its contribution to the global hiatus in surface temperatures will come to an end,” Professor England says." ---------------- Recent intensification of wind-driven circulation in the Pacific and the ongoing warming hiatus Nature Climate Change 4, 222-227 (2014) doi:10.1038/nclimate2106 Received 11 September 2013 Accepted 18 December 2013 Published online 09 February 2014 Corrected online 14 February 2014 Matthew H. England, Shayne McGregor, Paul Spence, Gerald A. Meehl, Axel Timmermann, Wenju Cai, Alex Sen Gupta, Michael J. McPhaden, Ariaan Purich & Agus Santoso Affiliations "Here we show that a pronounced strengthening in Pacific trade winds over the past two decades-unprecedented in observations/reanalysis data and not captured by climate models-is sufficient to account for the cooling of the tropical Pacific and a substantial slowdown in surface warming through increased subsurface ocean heat uptake." --------- It started 1995. By 2012 the wind was a massive 30% (1 metre / second) stronger than pre-1995. I've not yet found post 2012 so I don't know whether the big 2015/16 El Nino was the end of the massive 17 to 20 year Trade Wind surge.

Tell why carbon reductuction emission and CHEMTRAILS on the sky why? Are the power to be use the bast solution for human race ? Why people keep quiet and put up with everything and use starvation ,wars instead best solution? Because nobody have the brain to go take places and take the power away from parasites of this planet Banking Cartel.

Did any reliable recorded data exist?

I'm surprised no one here talk about of geoengineering programs. I have been back from a trip to Europe for a few weeks and I guarantee you that they sprayed the skies every day

@@KoDeMondo same in and around Montreal in Canada

The have been rain seeding in Australia as well. It’s on public record.

Could you please release your data? Thanks.

I dont know where you live in rio, but never been so cold here . In copacabana / ipanema I never used jackets in winter , maybe one or 2 days, now have used even in October. Plus much less beach days this last 2 years. Summer being less warm and winter / fall / autumm much colder.

I’ve noticed something similar here in my part of the Mid Atlantic US. Winters have been mild enough that I don’t need my snowblower and summers are not as hot. There hasn’t been a string of days in the 100’s F and the week of bitter cold in January is gone too.

It's a scam.

@@UpliftingMusicbr do you remember 1974,75,76 ? Last time it happened ?

@@ricktd6891 ?

Why, who needs instruments, and record keeping, when you can have one man's anecdotal assurances to bear witness.

@@secondotranquilli3973 sure , why believe yours eyes when experts are there to tell the truth and use your taxpayer money .

@@secondotranquilli3973 I'm curious as to what's your age, level of education and what sex you identify as. As humans mature they on the average learn to value and respect the knowledge of elders.

The major influence on our weather is the sun. It has an eleven year cycle. Perhaps that solar cycle is what causes the La Nina and El Nino cycle. We are currently in the upswing of solar storm activity in the eleven year cycle.

@@y2kmagna when you consider the atmosphere is 1/1000th of the diameter of the earth , it is incredible how it can be stable at all .

Some other weather channels have covered this. It's very interesting.

Tornado's, hurricanes ,have a effect on our climate,so does the taconic plate movement,and so do earthquakes,volcano's,and birds flapping their wings on other side of the world ,awww joy of climate change,in truth nobody can really change any of it,but keep trying,we haven't been on earth that long,maybe we will go poof,or maybe not,but fun to waste money....

Yeah all the billions spent on trying to change the climate, can be deleted by a single damn volcano. its a waste of money to try and fight nature.

Yup, that is one thing climate change activists always over look. We've had 400 years of increasing volcanic activity which makes anything we humans put out for CO2 and green house gases look like a fart in the wind.

Yeah, watch out for those terrorgrams - a million times worse than killergrams

I wanted to learn more information so I searched what caused past global glaciations (aka Ice Ages) and I found my answer. To synopsize, Earth's distance from the sun fluctuates and we currently are in a closer, warm phase that we're about halfway through. In a few hundred years the next event will start cooling Earth and then the climate will get colder pretty quickly but the full change to Ice Age takes many hundred of years or more which is why people can't actually discern it for themselves. Ice sheets two miles thick crush to dust ANYTHING humans can build and when they retreat due to warming unbelievably torrential flooding follows and continues for millennia, meaning that between the ice and the flooding any evidence and accomplishments of possible somewhat advanced prior civilizations might be completely obliterated and washed away.

How are they about to be forced?

Or increased atmospheric moisture due to warming. Anything to avoid admitting the anthropogenic drivers of current climate change. La Nina patterns are part of the event not contrary to it.

@@bobbygetsbanned6049 do you understand the basics of climate science?

Solar cycles and solar activity, volcanic activity, are important into short time models (periods about 100 years). New models could include them as important factors, not like nowadays excluded by "ceteris paribus"

Yes, it seems that people with an agenda are more than happy to restrict the scope or timescale to suit their arguments. Australia has always been a land of extremes. But sure, force us all back to serfdom.

@@guser7137 If you are talking about the fascist left yes we will all end up either dead or as serfs, if we keep swallowing...the climate alarmist rubbish. The fascist Green left will only be happy once they bring in their preferred method of getting things done, AI and androids and anyone centre right in political views can abide by their way of doing things or go off to the Soylent Green factory. But if you mean humans are destined for perpetual serfdom because of climate change, I would say yes unless you adapt. 95% of species that have ever existed on Earth are extinct now due to climate change, volcanism and meteorites and geomagnetic pole shifts or weakening and changes to our sun etc.

@@guser7137 - " und vot iz wrong viz a little serdom ? " - Kraut Shwarb 😫

@@guser7137 blah

@@ppetal1 You're welcome. My point still stands.

Certainly cyclical. The question is of timescale. Migratory birds have been aware that Lake Eyre can and does become wet.

Different strange things have been happening now I have been witnesses of what is going in Amoc system because I live in Poland and the UK.I have vineyard in Poland and I'm checking weather frequently.Summers are definitely not warmer but winters are warmer in Poland . I have noticed over active Atlantic circulation with much rain in Poland.it used to be -35 a decade ago in winter now there is a rain and max -9C with maritime climate style effect.Cold dry air pushed further east.I guess atmosphere is trying to get rid of warmth form Atlantic ocean

There is another commenter from the south east coast of NZ saying similar about the extra wettness. I am just north of Melbourne on land, and watch WeatherwatchNZ youtube channel for good forcasting if you need it. It has lots of Tassie reference on it that seems to be lacking on Australian forcasts.

see....kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ppuWa5eHmc7bk6s.html on models

They have been cloud seeding since 1947 you can look it up on KZfaq they are not trying to hide it, most of it’s done by the military and contractors I live on the south shore of the St. Lawrence river and there are days when you could play checkers in the sky ,chemtrails last and then form wispy clouds ,vapour trails Disperse within 30 seconds so they are not the same

Glad you like them!

@@JustHaveaThink look into the fact that we are supposed to be entering into an ice age right now we are burning fossil fuels to be able to prevent this ice age... I think it is important to regulate the temperature of the planet we need to be able to control our carbon footprint as well as being able to control the temperature of the planet through such implementations.

@@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler it's a bold experiment!

Please list all the adverse climate predictions by your thousands of studies from, say, the last fifty years that have come true. (To help you, there aren't any.)

@@MrCSutton you have a few of them at the IPCC reports ;)

Pablo Balbontín Yeah I've found it hilarious for 10 years. Really could they even be any more transparently having no interest at all in the science and only in their money ? I think not. I think they couldn't possible show more clearly their SOLE interest in life .. M O N E Y. It's hilariously comical. Most of them are sock puppets, they have empty "Channels", accounts set up only for trolling climate change videos with cut'n'paste parroted Drivel Memes that have been concocted for them by professional liars, it's quick'n' easy. 9 years ago I had several exchanges with a "Gina Titnaw" before a bloke told me she's a sock puppet account of a bloke who works for a Ruzzian oil company. Some of them are obviously A.I. computer programs now, they are good but not so good that you can't spot them robocalling in the comments.

Models based on human made expectations rather than actual data. As well as cherry picking historical data like increases in tornado report through the 90s after the implementation of a satellite monitoring system and recording F0 tornadoes when F1s were hardly reported in the past. Most of the hottest recorded temps are in the 1930s but the data we are shown begins in the 80s

@@Kalicdire Most of the hottest recorded temperatures where? Talk about cherry picking.

@@tonyclayton6975 all over the world

@@Kalicdire That is simply not true. If you believe it is, show me the data.

@@tonyclayton6975 just google heat records, you’ve made it clear you wouldn’t believe anything he said anyway.

bingo! Earth receives more energy from the Sun *in just one day* than all of humanity combined uses in 25 years - solar output varies by around 3%, however that variation is only a tiny speck of data as we've only been recording it for a very short time in a 4 billion year history also Earths' magnetosphere is highly variable as is Earths' orbit and Precessional wobble - modern 'science' and their models ignore all these factors

Some scientists claim Suns Spektrum changed to more visible Light( longer waves) and less shortwaves causing earths warmup.

Suspicious observers KZfaq channel covers this

no, you missunderstood. We've had it four years running (so far) when we only had four total years in the past century.

@@Tqoratsos666 Um, no. Go back and listen again at 1:19. The speaker is referring to the count of La Nina periods equal to or exceeding 3 years since 1900. I did make a minor error in my statement, in that i referred to last century, whereas the speaker was actually referring to the entire period since 1900, though it's not clear to me from looking at the actual data if he's counting the current event as one of the ones since 1900. Again, given that 24 La Nina events have occurred in the 123 years since the start of 1900, comprising 58 years in that period and most of them go for 2-3 years, I'm really not sure what point is being made, which was the general thrust of my original comment. I'm also not sure how to reconcile the statement with the actual data when you go and look at it, but I'm not going to go into that here.

"Useful" to commit fraud and enact "lockdowns" which is a euphemism for imprisonment + slavery

Good reply. If you notice, china was in great trouble last year with the yellow river dam overflowing. Its almost empty at this point! Other places like the Hoover dam is also almost empty...BUT other DRY places are quite wet.. unusually so. El Nina is the issue!

The most accurate thing he said was the models are wrong. He says the researchers don't know what's going on. Then the researchers make a prediction that GHG induced climate change will reverse the current trend and cause calamity.

There is no science to understand. Their models are consistently wrong. The only science they are doing is cherry-picking the data to scare you into the action of disrupting your life and paying more taxes with the absurd idea that the government can control the weather.

Science hahahaha 🤣

Problem with climate change is things change an I find it hard to believe they know exactly the damage an the way it should change. Look predicting the weather a week ahead is barley possible now yet I'm suppose to believe you know what the weather will be in 30 year's from now 😂 to be clear obviously global warming is a thing but saying what it'll be in decades from now is ludicrous, our planet evolves it has for past couple billion years, planet will be fine however those rich elites that run everything an live mostly on beaches, Florida,Cali, Hawaii surely will have to relocate. Don't think that has anything do with this do you?

@@notinterested8452 Trust the science, trust the science, squack.

same here in NZ, nearly December and still got the fire going.

So the real number and magnitude of floods and fires equals the number and magnitude floods and fires divided by the number of people affected? Got it 👍

Any change you notice over the years is anecdotal. Humans don't control the weather.

@@BrianStDenis-pj1tq Your first statement is illogical. If I notice the sun moving across the sky throughout the day there is nothing anecdotal (unreliable) about it. Change is change. Whether that short-term change is indicative of a long-term effect can *sometimes* only reliably be determined by accurate scientific measurements, but there are a multitude of cases where observed change is obviously indicative of long-term systemic change. There's nothing anecdotal (unreliable) about watching a glacier disappear over a person's lifetime. Your second statement redeems you somewhat. Humans don't control the weather, control implies the ability to direct something toward a desired, determined outcome. Instead we provide a forcing, a push toward chaos with the pollution from our activity, as we are now seeing. We have absolutely no control over it, but will have to weather the consequences.

@@geoffcapper5025 that not what he said - at all.

@@geoffcapper5025 This is a statistics issue. The measure of temperature that you can observe daily, typically reported as the daily high temperature, fluctuates wildly. The global mean temperature, made up of millions of square miles of wildly fluctuating temperatures cannot be observed over a few years in a single location nor in a dozen locations. This applies to every global weather statistic, from rain to tornadoes to melting glaciers. Local observations are statistically unrelated events compared to the global trend. And, as you surly know, its already been hotter on this planet than it is now, and its been colder also. There has been more CO2 in the air than now in the past. So, again, measuring a few years or even hundreds of years really doesn't tell us cause and effects in such a chaotic system.

There will be more droughts There will be more floods. Australia!

They'll be back... (Apologies to Arnold)

Canberra. Do people actually live there?

Thank your lucky stars!

@@petercoxable I think I saw one last week. Hard to see through the foliage so it could have been a kangaroo.

Don't waste your time, most of the comments are "BuT cLimAtE cHaNgE iS a HoAx"

I know this one: volcanic activity all combined the crust over/under water does not even come close to the CO2 levels by Man and his burning approx 100 million barrels of oil per day.

Don't worry, all our dams are full now, we have more than enough water for irrigation. Most of the land won't need irrigation for the rest of the year and into 2023. Dartmouth dam is full for the first time since 1996 at 102%. Many floodplains on the Murray/Darling are flooded, the River Gums will live a little longer. The entire river environment needs water flow and flooding , we use far too much of it and are killing those 2 great rivers. The Coorong in SA especially is in dire need of large flows of fresh water yearly, this years they will get a good flush. Lived in Cairns myself for 4 years, Vic is a bit like that now, wet, just colder!

Jason Tempest - it's no use relying on beurocrats to come up with planning solutions. They're paper shufflers. I am sure it's feasible to harvest that water in underground reservoirs to to supply a massive growing area. It would be great to see Australian desert turn into lush tropical greenery. Check out Brazil"s Terra Preta.

@@kelduck8851 That isn't long and before you know it, we'll be back to drought conditions with the next La Nina. I'm not old but I've already seen these cycles repeat time over again and again. Anyway I know my region will be well watered regardless but what about the southern inland?

I'm surprised no one here talk about of geoengineering programs. I have been back from a trip to Europe for a few weeks and I guarantee you that they sprayed the skies every day

Exactly I can remember clearly we thought it was never going to stop and for a kid that's not good, bloody rain.

all climate is controlled by the Sun - humans have absolutely nothing to do with it

Scientists.. the people yet to get climate change models right after fifty years of crystal ball guesses?

The solar wind cycle. Sun spots. Is an 11 year cycle. And in 2024 we will encounter the grand solar minimum. Predicted to bring a mini ice age

@@TheBelrick crystal ball guesses? never knew they were that sophiosticated! i was sure they tossed coins!

How dare you comment here about things only one person knows about who is not you! 😂 I think we found the channel troll. 😉

I agree, John. Vicious is the word alright. If you have lived on a farm you will know the effect they have on people. I remember hearing of one farmer who was in such despair because of the effects of one such drought, one day went out and shot his livestock and then shot himself. I know floods can be tragic and cause a lot of damage and loss of life, but most floods in Australia are usually single, short-term events and communities recover fairly quickly afterwards (except of course when you get one flood after another which has happened this year). Droughts, especially those that go on for years, cause far more damage to the land, even more so if it is accompanied by bushfires. Nevertheless, whether it is a flood or a drought, land and wildlife populations on the whole do recover. With the third consecutive La Nina, inland Australia has undergone a huge transformation with consistent rainfall. Flooding has made farming challenging but I think more water inland is preferable to none at all.

This change in Sun activity also increases earth quake and volcanic activity.

When are we going to talk about how most solar energy is not in UV or the Visible Spectrum, and its dominance in determining the various yearly and decadal weather cycles? Or that the Farmer's Almanac bases their predictions on solar weather, not IPCC models.

@@David-135 what mechanism? I’ve never heard of this.

What happened to the massive global cooling that the sunspot enthusiasts promised us from the last solar cycle?

@@float32 I guess you're a slave to your 5G vaccine chips. Or something. Wouldn't it be nice if we had a social media platform that excluded the dingbats?

You've made a general implication of an entire field of science. Be specific. Who? When? (We are aware of the slander and how it was debunked)

could be seems like a chain reaction u say aye

@Ozgeographics has a video on this. It is an interesting theory.

@@Rawkus919 that's where I heard it. Thought that name was familiar. I recommend looking at this video.

Tim, I like your model. I got it, just remember the figure 70!

Right. The natural warm peak of this inter-glacial period was 6,000 years ago. Since the industrial revolution temperatures have climbed dramatically.

Some have said Tonga's volcanic eruption had influence on the weather this year...

Did you know an ex NASA employee testified in the Aussie parliament that NASA where giving false ocean temperatures readings in the waters around Australia, it was on KZfaq the video...

Claiming that your observations over "30yrs or so" are "forever" is pure nonsense. Half Human lifetime perspectives on weather patterns are worthless.

@@torqueover Of course, we have another "expert" here. Funny, how the "experts" show up in comments on youtube. So, "expert", why don't you enlighten us clueless people how things really are? The all knowing torqueover will have all the answers.

@@autohmae your right the Tongan volcano blasted huge amounts of moisture into upper atmosphere With quite strong trade winds it was carried all the way across 2 us . The low dumping rain on the northern rivers region just sucked it all in.🤟

Very well written for a Andre's man ;)

You are lying! Let’s forget for a moment about you being here to confuse dullards.

Tell why carbon reductuction emission and CHEMTRAILS on the sky why? Are the power to be use the bast solution for human race ? Why people keep quiet and put up with everything and use starvation ,wars instead best solution? Because nobody have the brain to go take places and take the power away from parasites of this planet Banking Cartel.

Earth’s magnetic field is thinning rapidly and solar flares are penetrating deeper into the atmosphere. Find a high altitude cave to shelter in just in case the magnetic shield thins further-- which it is trending to do and warm clothes and blankets. This weather forecaster is not paying attention to the sun’s cycles or earth’s thinning magnetic shield.

@@rivergrrrl1256 Interesting. ...Who measured the magnetic field and how ?

This is one of the best written comments I've ever come across. Do you mind if I use it in the future? Eyes open, no fear.

@@Eyes0penNoFear Sure, that is fine.

@@justinw1765 awesome thanks! And I have to ask. I have a cousin with your same name and last initial. You didn't happen to grow up in a small Nevada town did you? -KW

This is one of the most absurd gish gallops of total drivel & irrelevance I've ever come across. Do you mind if I use it in the future as an example of the worst sort of ignorant crap that you coal-oil-gas shill-Troll-Clowns put out ? Thanks.

The aborigians really are resilient are'nt they?

At least one of earths biggest coal extractor, get a taste of theire own gloal impact, rather then the usual 3 world countries

@@zombi3lif3 As a Zimbabwean I always found the term "3rd world" funny... as if you'd portal through some stargate or wormhole (two of them) to get here. 😅🤣

@@zombi3lif3 And in English ?

@@princetate1586 all the animals in the outback are, so yes.

Really longterm projections show Australia getting much wetter due to global warming, although it'll be so hot I'm not sure if the increased rainfall will fully compensate for the increased evaporation. Eventually if Antarctica melts the middle of Australia will become an enormous sea. The remainder of the continent will become much, much wetter and the weather moderated considerably.

Robert Gotschall There isn't any new normal because humans are changing it waaaay too fast for a planet. Whatever it is now it'll not be returning back to now for a few hundred years or now let alone returning back to late 20th century, because there's waaaay too much thermal inertia (or momentum if you like) in a PLANET.

@@sunspot42 If Australia's interior did fill to create an inland sea, it would be ironic because historic travels to discover Australia had been based in an assumption that it would host an inland sea; which of course failed to materialise.

@@sunspot42 they canceled global warming because too many places are getting colder not warmer, they call it climate change now

The magnetic north pole is near alaska.Traveling at 1000 mph, the sky is not moving we are.

There are so many variables critical to our weather around the world. Sun spots for one generally are on a 22 year cycle of 11 year Solar Max and Solar Minimum. The max refers to the periods where the sun is exploding its most violent radiation toward the Earth, often causing breakdowns of power stations and electronic media and communications, and most of all increased HEAT! Then the Solar Minimum where the Sunspots are the left over marks left from the massive explosions roasting everything they left behind. There is also the Maunder Minimum recorded by several scientists in the 1800's again effecting weather cycles following patterns. El Nino and La Nina are warming and cooling areas of the oceans which change the deep water currents effecting everything salinity, currents, weather, etc. and of course the atmospheric weather bringing storms and chaos to the seas and oceans and water to the entire system with rain and clouds. Trying to model this system with a computer in a short period of time is next to impossible as the records are vague and often incorrect, recently being used to manipulate Human behavior and politics for often nefarious purposes! The fires in the Western states and Australia, all connected to these many things with our governments invariably refusing to clear forest undergrowth and provide roads and firebreaks. And failure to understand the devilish winds whipping through hills and valleys starting and increasing wild fires, mostly by arson and lightning by ineffective fire controls. Peace sm

Tim, I'm not a scientist but I've read a little. It seems some of the volcanoes in the past have caused weather pattern changes, though temporary and short lived. Like when krakatoa blew in the 1800s and following year without a summer? They were getting snow in July and couldn't plant crops that year. A lot of people starved! Now with all the pollution from industrialization of the modern world and natural cycles of the earth's weather, sun spots, under ground nuclear tests. My point, with all the variables and no long term records except ice cores..... We have no idea what's going on or what's going to happen. Ice age brought on by global warming? It's all really a guess!

Sounds pretty good to me. Older people who have had long experience of the unpredictability of weather are much less impressed by Chicken Licken stories that the sky is falling down that some younger people who know better!

@@davidlawrenson2103 David, I'm not saying that the world's weather is not a problem. What I'm saying is even with ice cores telling us what the earth's weather was like even 50 thousand years ago is irrelevant. We are here and now. The earth 50 thousand years ago wasn't feeding nearly 8 billion people, have all the pollution from industial, having an island of trash floating in the Pacific Ocean around the equator area. Those ice cores won't show how raging wildfires are filling the atmosphere with ash and co2, or how much pollution tens of thousands of jets taking off every day from airports, country's burning coal, oil and gas for energy. There's nothing in the ice cores that'll reflect the damage we're doing to the earth. But sooner or later, mother nature will make it right. That's why the earth is 4 and a half billion years old and man has been here for what a couple hundred thousand years?

@@shaker1485 Sorry Shaker, I was replying to Tim's point not knocking you. I went on a cruise from the UK to New Zealand via the Panama canal a couple of years ago crossing both the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. I didn't see much of anything, just a few birds and one ship. I certainly didn't see any pollution, just endless miles of ocean. I'm not saying there aren't a few plastic bottles but I didn't see any oil slicks , dead polar bears or the like. Considering Carbon Dioxide is absolutely essential to all life and it makes up just one third of one tenth of one percent of the atmosphere , I wouldn't dare describe it as pollution. It is no more a pollutant than oxygen or water.

Just imagine the catastrophic swings you would have observed if you were 15,000 years old

@@mattbrew11 Or fifteen million. Or a hundred and fifty million. So what?

@@kimweaver1252 so the climate has been literally unlivable for humans countless times before we got here and will continue to become that way long after we are gone. Thats if a comet strike like the one that ended the last ice age and wiped out 90% of humans did 11,000 years ago doesn’t get us first.

What I hate is they are spraying chemtrails to change weather patterns and no one is accounting the changes to them, I have seen it over and over were they have used it to create droughts and floods. The rain is toxic now full of nano particle aluminum coating all it comes into contact making everything a fire danger, if you are still allowed to have your water tested for the aluminium with a electron microscope you will see what I mean.

Your comments do not match the data. I suggest you stop imagining problems and educate yourself on the true weather patterns of your area. Your comments here do not reflect reality. You are indulging in propaganda.+