Dark times on the horizon 🥺

We need to sign Man Shitty....

None other than pep lindjers

Secret liverpool fan

@@chonlienlalhaokip3139 Players to stay Virgil,Jarell,Alison,Bradley,Trent,Macca,Elliott,Jones,Gakpo,Salah and Bajectic.Get rid of 11 players and call back some of loanees and elevate some of Under 18 and under 21.

Without screaming and click and bait stuff , she does a nice job!

@@NoFrictionZone exactly. All the others just talk hype and very emotional and dont do proper research n stats

Totally agree... from a Die hard Liverpool fan

The fact that I've seen this comment as the first comment on every one of Alice's videos is further proof of this

Better than anyone on MotD or Sky

I agree. I hope you’re working on a career path that will land you on the main stream media.

Yeah!

Darwin needs some ayuhasca or w/e

Thats what I think, him and Diaz need to be less frantic

🤣🤣

I totally agree that Alice gives by far the most detailed and researched analysis on any site or by any pundit.Although i still believe she is secretly a "closet" Liverpool fan 😉 aye to be sure lol 💚

Appreciate it.

Another brilliant video, Alice 👏 You are fast becoming the main source of information regarding Liverpool and potential signings.

Yep! And personalize it with 'ECILA FOOTBALL" on the kit 👍👍👍

If I worked at Liverpool I’d be trying to convince them to spent £100m on Antony so Man Utd can have that money. But thanks ahaha 🤣

@@ECILAFootball😂😂

No pleeeeze not Antony,i beg of you Alice,show us mercy!😁😂😄 And definitely not for a 100million lol,maybe for a tenner we can do a deal but we'll expect change from that tenner! 😉 lol

Alice has more insights as compared to any of those so called pundits and she is a Man U fan how ironic. 😊😊😊

I appreciate that haha

If it was a male would you say the same?

Love it

Appreciate that. Hope you get better soon.

Nope. Sky would never hire someone with a brain. She is way to smart.

Thanks aha

Wow, thank you!

Totally agree, could save us a lot of money as well.

He does like young players. I’d say Elliott will be one he takes a liking to for sure.

Carvalho seems to have a suspect temperament…….think he will be okay …….but not at Liverpool.

Haha thanks :)

Shouldn't all clubs be self-sustaining? If not, a lot clubs would have gone out of business. And with the league talking about implementing a transfer and salary cap based on revenue, LFC might be in better stead than others with this model. They just need to continue winning bit by bit to pull in more revenue without spending obscenely big.

Nonsense that FSG are cheap. Ever since Edwards left, the management of recruitment/transfers by Klopp and his pals has been bad. FSG have always supported Klopp in terms of funding. 1. Michael Edwards wanted to replace our ageging midfield with Bruno G. and Enzo. Klopp chose to extend Henderson & Milner contracts and got his wish. Nobody was talking about lack of funding then. 2. In the past 2-3 seasons, Klopp has spent - Nunez -80m Gakpo - 40m Szobo - 70m Diaz - 40m Grav - 40m Macca - 35m It isn't FSG's fault that klopp doesn't know how to recruit players. 3. Last season Klopp and his friend Jorg wasted the whole summer window despite knowing that we desperately need a top no.6 and even more so after Fabinho left. How did they manage this situation? Waited till the last minute to bid for Caicedo (at the point where his head was already at Chelsea) and then tried to save a few million quid on Lavia. In the end had to panic buy the backup (Endo) and thank god it worked else we would be royally screwed. Because of how bad they handled this situation we now have to waste Maccalister at 6 at times when he is actually more effective up front. 4. Also, a waste of 40m on Gravenberch the bench warmer when we already have many players who play that position. These funds would have been better utilized for a top no.6 (Palinha was available till the end of the window) and now this will pain us through FFP.

​@@sachinshah4594 Nuisance when half-baked truths are spurted around. The more annoying thing is more people actually get on this band wagon. FSG are cheap or thrifty (use your word of choice). But the bottom line of spending not more than ~50M from their cash reserve is a recurrent theme. Their spend might be higher - most of it recouped from player resale. "Michael Edwards wanted to replace our ageging midfield with Bruno G. and Enzo. Klopp chose to extend Henderson & Milner contracts and got his wish. Nobody was talking about lack of funding then." A lot of liverpool fan channels were talking about it then too. You cant just make blanket statements and claim that to be true. There was clear callout for ball-playing midfield then as most of them were just pressing/hard-working players - Fabinho/Henderson/Milner/Ox. Besides extending a contract is way cheaper than buying new players. So, it is not really a valid argument. However, it is true that Klopp insisted on these changes. Jorg did screw it up. Trying to go after Caicedo was a ploy to shoo off Boehly. Many senior journalist believe that it. The real screw was Bellingham saga. Penny-pinching for Lavia is also reflection of how FSG transfer committee conduct their business (not just Jorg). 2023 summer: In: Macca (35M), Sobozlai (60M) Ryan (37M) and Endo (17M) Out: Keita (Free), Ox(free), Bobby(free), Henderson (16M), Fabinho (42M) Net spend: ~60M (note Sobozlai fee are to be paid over installments 30M upfront). 2022 summer: In: Nunez (78M) Out: Mane (34M) Origi (free) Again, Diaz transfer was around (52M) not 40M and has been split over 5 yrs of payment. Gakpo is 34M. You can question Klopp and Jorg about recruiting. But it is tangential to the point that has been made. It is about FSG's inclination to spend. Amiron was highly rated by Edwards even when Alonso was being linked. But the transfer broke down because Amiron's system is different and there would require to sell and buy so many players. Something FSG dont want to afford. @nghianja What should be and what is are two different things. Imposing a spending limit now when you've let one club get away with it is still giving unfair advantage to that one club that got away. So it is more favoring man city than any other club.

I'm more worried about the owner's decision making process and the consensus that Michael Edwards can do nothing wrong. I was against giving Salah what he wanted two years ago, and the last season and this one hasn't changed my mind with hindsight. He was supposed to drag Liverpool to win major trophies, as a world class player but Liverpool only won the Carling Cup. His scoring tally which makes his staunch supporters sing his praises masks the fact that his conversion rate is very low. As for Edwards he supposedly pulled a masterstroke by selling Solanke for 19M but it seems he was on the contrary a good catch for Bournemouth, and we could would have been grateful to have him at the club. It might seem that I'm saying this with the benefit of hindsight, but I thought he had a future at Liverpool 3 years ago, he is tall, strong and athletic and has a good attitude, at the very least I would have expected Edwards to put a buy back clause when he was sold to Bournemouth.

people are a bit hard on ten hag, i mean the entire squad is poor with no patterns of play in them at all. they fall apart in every game they play even when they are 3 goals up . thats on the players on the pitch

I appreciate that!

Completely understandable. I think you’ve just got to try be positive and look ahead to next season now.

Throughout history, it's been common for teams to be in a position to win the league, and then capitulate (often much more dreadfully than Liverpool this season). Arsenal's end to last season was a lot worse. 2013-14: Liverpool won 11 games in a row to put themselves on the brink, and then, having done the hard part, had that dreadful home loss to Chelsea before surrendering a 3-0 lead against Crystal Palace. 1995-96: Newcastle were 12 pts ahead (or 9 with a game in hand) after 25 games, and had only dropped 15 pts all season at that point, but then dropped 17 pts from their next 8 games. 1994-95: Blackburn dropped 11 pts from their last 6 games, but Man Utd also dropped enough pts to let them still win the league by a single point. 1992-93: Aston Villa were 2 pts ahead of Man Utd towards the end of March, and then lost 4 of their last 8 games. 1988-89: Arsenal were 14 pts ahead of Liverpool (after the same # of games) at one point in February, but were still 3 pts behind entering the final game of the season, in which Liverpool, just needing to avoid losing by 2 goals at home, lost by 2 goals at home. 1986-87: Arsenal were 3 pts ahead with a game in hand in Jan, and then took just 4 pts from their next 10 games, and Liverpool were then 3 pts clear with a game in hand in mid/late-March, but then lost 4 of their next 5 games and finished 9 pts behind minnows Everton. 1983-84: Man Utd were top till the 31st of March and had just beaten Arsenal 4-0 and overturned a 2-goal deficit to beat Barcelona in the QF of the Cup-Winners' Cup, but then took just 8 pts from their last 10 games and finished 6 pts behind Liverpool, who themselves only took 11 pts from their last 8 games. 1981-82: Man City were top at the turn of the year, but only won 5 more games and finished 10th with a -1 goal-difference (and got relegated the following season ... happy days). 1980-81: Ipswich had lost only 2 of their first 32 games, were top with games in hand and on course for a treble of league, FA-Cup and UEFA Cup, but then lost 7 of their last 10 league games (to finish a point behind an Aston Villa team who themselves only won 2 of their last 5 games), and also lost in the cup SF to minnows Man City. 1974-75: Everton were top with games in hand, and then only won 2 of their last 10 games and finished 3 pts behind a Derby County team who were 4th with 2 games to play, but who finished top after merely drawing their last 2 games (because Liverpool and Ipswich also dropped pts in their final 2 games). 1973-74: Leeds were unbeaten after 29 games in late Feb, and 4 wins ahead of Liverpool, but then lost 4 of their next 7 games so that Liverpool were in a position to win the title if both teams won all their remaining games, but then Liverpool actually only won 1 of their last 8 games. 1972-73: Liverpool only won 3 of their last 7 games, but still won the title, because Arsenal only won 1 of their last 6. 1971-72: Derby only won 3 of their last 6 games, but still finished a single point ahead of 3 other teams (Liverpool, who failed to win both their last 2 games, and Leeds, who only won 4 of their last 8 games, and Man City, who only won 3 of their last 8 games).

I like him for sure. Value for money looks good but I’d have to do a bit more research (watched him a bit first half of season but not lately)

Never a good idea to have a defender with a stutter. By the time he tells the keeper that the ball is y..y..y..y..y..y..yours, the opposition has already nipped in and scored.

Thanks, appreciate it.