TOP 10 Most Advanced Infantry Fighting Vehicles - TOP 10 Best IFV in The World
Рет қаралды 113,223
Күн бұрынThis project exists thanks to donations. Support him!
Patreon: / armyencyclopedia
Donation: www.donationalerts.com/r/army...
NFT: opensea.io/collection/armyenc...
An infantry fighting vehicle (IFV), also known as a mechanized infantry combat vehicle (MICV), is a type of armoured fighting vehicle used to carry infantry into battle and provide direct-fire support. The 1990 Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe defines an infantry fighting vehicle as "an armoured combat vehicle which is designed and equipped primarily to transport a combat infantry squad, and which is armed with an integral or organic cannon of at least 20 millimeters calibre and sometimes an antitank missile launcher". IFVs often serve both as the principal weapons system and as the mode of transport for a mechanized infantry unit.
Infantry fighting vehicles are distinct from armored personnel carriers (APCs), which are transport vehicles armed only for self-defense and not specifically engineered to fight on their own. IFVs are designed to be more mobile than tanks and are equipped with a rapid-firing autocannon or a large conventional gun; they may include side ports for infantrymen to fire their personal weapons while on board.
The IFV rapidly gained popularity with armies worldwide due to a demand for vehicles with higher firepower than APCs that were less expensive and easier to maintain than tanks. Nevertheless, it did not supersede the APC concept altogether, due to the latter's continued usefulness in specialized roles. Some armies continue to maintain fleets of both IFVs and APCs.
10. Hunter (Singapore)
9. ZBD-08 (China)
8. Kurganets-25 (Russia)
7. ASCOD (Austria/Spain)
6. M2 Bradley (USA)
5. Tulpar (Turkey)
4. CV90 (Sweden)
3. K-21 (South Korea)
2. Lynx (Germany)
1. Puma (Germany).
00:00 Top 10 Infantry Fighting Vehicles
00:55 #10. Hunter (Singapore)
01:42 #9. ZBD-08 (China)
04:01 #8. Kurganets-25 (Russia)
05:46 #7. ASCOD (Austria/Spain)
07:00 #6. M2 Bradley (USA)
08:38 #5. Tulpar (Turkey)
09:50 #4. CV90 (Sweden)
12:11 #3. K-21 (South Korea)
14:22 #2. Lynx (Germany)
16:18 #1. Puma (Germany)
Music from #InAudio: inaudio.org/
Track Name. Cinematic Background Epic by Infraction [No Copyright Music] / The Journey
_______________________________
► More Military videos on: • Top 10 Most Advanced M...
TWITEER: / quasarenter
_______________________________
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
The Quasar Entertainment does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email quasraquasarquasar777@gmail.com.
#top10 #top5 #ifv #hunter #zbd08 #zbd04 #kurganets #kurganets25 #ascod #m2bradley #tulpar #cv90 #k21 #lynx #lynxifv #puma #pumaifv
@ArmyEncyclopedia Жыл бұрын
► More Military videos on: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/apyCbNuItq2mfYE.html&ab_channel=QUASAREntertainment
@tomeng9520 Жыл бұрын
CV90 Wins hands down.
@Yuki_Ika7 Жыл бұрын
Agreed, best all around, options on options on options, can be customized to fit virtually any need, low profile, combat proven, etc.
@DarkHorseSki Жыл бұрын
Nope. KF41 does everything the CV90 does but even better.
@tomeng9520 Жыл бұрын
@@DarkHorseSki CV90 best all around, options on options on options, can be customized to fit virtually any need, low profile, combat proven, the 40mm cannon is a beast, etc.
@DarkHorseSki Жыл бұрын
@@tomeng9520 The KF41 is designed, from the start to be even more modular and customizable. And there are versions of the KF41 mounting the 50mm beast (check out the OMFV submission), and Rheinmetall has a long record of combat proven vehicles. And, cost for the KF41 is significantly less. Lynx is a better vehicle (by just a bit) at a much better cost (by quite a bit.) This very channel made note of that when it talked about the LAND 400 competition in Australia (within the last couple of years.)
@opponenspericulo Жыл бұрын
Yup, CV90's the way to go, those not seeing that, I pity.
@kentunemo5866 Жыл бұрын
The Cv 90 rules them all...
@davesmith7993 Жыл бұрын
The CV90 120 with it's 120mm main gun can even support main battle tanks. Very versatile
@DarkHorseSki Жыл бұрын
The Lynx has demonstrated a much better working version with their KF120 version of the vehicle.
@christopherdunstan4663 Жыл бұрын
AS21 Redbacks
@konradantoniak4281 Жыл бұрын
Soon, there may be two different IFVs in Poland, claiming to be the best in their class in the world. The light BORSUK IFV and the heavy PL-21 IFV based on the AS-21 REDBACK IFV. While Borsuk is already starting to be produced, PL-21 is being negotiated as to what it will look like as a final product. The Borsuk IFV was designed with the terrain in mind. More precisely, it is about overcoming various water sewage, which is why it is a light IFV. The PL-21, on the other hand, may consist of: 1) a chassis fitted with the K9 Thunder and AHS Krab cannon-howitzers. 2) ZSSW-30 unmanned turret ( Borsuk has one). 3) IronVision system. 4) IronFist system. 5) Topaz system. 6) the armor remains the same as on the Redback. 7) hybrid engine
@ericb.4358 Жыл бұрын
A HYBRID ENGINE will become "standard" equipment on many new IFVs - if militaries are smart!
@ericb.4358 Жыл бұрын
The Bradley COULD have its life extended with the addition of a 50 mm cannon and a 6.5 mm machine gun (using 80,000 psi combat velocity ammo). Likingthat Swedish CV-90 and that 40 mm cannon.
@DarkHorseSki Жыл бұрын
The US version of the OMFV (whichever it turns out to be among the candidates) will have the 50mm gun.
@user-vo1ne3us7k 9 ай бұрын
this is why they say youtube is misinforming...you forgot the best one rebback the one one that beat lynx in the lamd 400 challenge,,,,
@kether1 Жыл бұрын
Where is Redback ?
@scartanbadea6374 Жыл бұрын
K 21 very impressive and closer to the needs of an ifv! In the rest of cv 90 you have to stop shooting?! 🤨 Puma the other day a fell all the army tests!😌Lynx e ifv or tank, 44 tons 😏!
@mlovew1 Жыл бұрын
What to your video you made and ranked SABRAH no 2?
@actualevents4621 Жыл бұрын
Claims that only will show IFVs that arr already in production... Proceeds to show russian IFV that is still in testing and who knows when will see production if ever. BTW Ukranie has BMP4 in production for years, and it has proven it self on battlefield.
@christopherdunstan4663 Жыл бұрын
I think Australia's new ifv Are definitely up their with the best they both look as good as one another I'd go with the redback
@edvinandersson2796 Жыл бұрын
How can Puma be number 1? It failed in 18 tests
@zhufortheimpaler4041 Жыл бұрын
no it was 18 vehicle breakdowns during a training excercise. This was due to thee poor maintenance conditiion of the vehicles, wich had been submitted to extensive combat training and excercises in the weeks/months preceeding the incident without the required maintenance applied to them at the neccesary intervall.
@xeniosaias Жыл бұрын
Puma n01......HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
@payzo 4 ай бұрын
Indonesia should be able to make IFV like these, hopefully in the future Indonesia will make its own IFV. .. 😁
@opponenspericulo Жыл бұрын
Why even mention CV90's first 1993 specs, when they are since long replaced w the latest stabilisers, optics & thermal imaging, even devices to mask appearance on the battlefield, such as the 'Ghost model' of CV90? Newer isn't always better, as we've seen w the Lynx/Puma, is what upgrades can provide for a good platform. And w 17 models of CV90, the swedes sure showed how it should be done.
@jonny2954 Жыл бұрын
-Armor, armament, FCS and optronics can be replaced in an upgrade. -Base hull structure and layout can not. If build to the exact same specs a new clean sheet design will always outperform a upgraded legacy platform.
@opponenspericulo Жыл бұрын
@@jonny2954 Not necessarily; the whole hull, turret, has been changed between different models of CV90. The models can be rebuilt like Lego; front, sides, top and back, including turret (or no turret), tracks25-120mm gun with adapter chassi for it, and number of drivewheels. It's about as modular as a vehicle can get. I'm sure you want a jet turbine engine it could be done too.
@jonny2954 Жыл бұрын
@@opponenspericulo The nature of the base hull remained the same since the Mk I. The rear dismount compartment roof has been raised among other changes, however the thickness or material of the steel armor hull has not been changed to allow a better weight-protection ratio for the usage of addon composite armor. New clean sheet design armored vehicles use the steel hull mostly (or in some cases only) for structural purposes, the ballistic protection is provided by composite armor. Modern composite armor has a 4+ times higher weight efficency than steel against KE and more than 8+ times against shaped charges. By reducing the amount of steel and maximising the amount of composite armor in a passive protection concept weight-protection ratio is boosted significantly. For every 100 kg of steel saved there can be 100 kg of composite which has the ballistic protection performance of 400+ kg of steel (against KE, against SC it's 800+ kg of steel!). Disadvantage being higher cost and volume of course (the reason for more modern IFVs being so much bigger from the outside despite having similar internal volume). The latest CV90 Mk IV still uses a steel armor hull made of the same material and of the same thickness as the Mk I. There has been composite addon armor added on top, but due to the high weight of the hull it's not nearly as much as modern designs like the Lynx or Redback manage. The Puma as example takes that principle to a whole different level, more than half of its total combat weight is composite armor.
@bkjworld 10 күн бұрын
AS21 REDBACK?????
@PREDATOR991000 Жыл бұрын
Kurganets-25 (Russia) Paper😉
@user-pc7om7xz8h Жыл бұрын
Топ ваш фигня, пока эти машины не испытаются в реальном бою, а не на полигоне)
@MaximRedin Жыл бұрын
It is a strange tradition of Nato countries to put German tanks or AFV to the 1st place. It is not field proven. Just send them to Ukraine battle field and you will see that it is not more efficient than other AFV.
@jonny2954 3 ай бұрын
The armor is kinda proven bozo, it literally has the same roof armor as the PZH 2000 which took a Lancet hit to the roof and didn't penetrate.
@artonieminen1873 Жыл бұрын
German army has 18 PUMAs, but not one is operative
@BartoszFalkowski Жыл бұрын
Not really. These 18 Pumas that broke were just assigned for the NATO' s VJTF (fast reaction forces). So not all they have in total :-) 350 were delivered, probably. However, they say Pumas have issus since beginning. They adopted them in 2015 and allegedely only in 2017 they were regarded as fight ready. But they have constant issues with them
@Cemm1905 Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@zhufortheimpaler4041 Жыл бұрын
@@BartoszFalkowski those problems are primarily maintenance related. The CDU Govrnment cut basicly all maintenance capability of the Bundeswehr in 2010 and since then the Bundeswehr struggles with readiness rates etc
@JamesLaserpimpWalsh Жыл бұрын
Tandem charge defeats slat armour. They defeat single charge rounds like old RPG rounds. Javelin goes through it like its nothing.
@taimikauppinen5282 Жыл бұрын
CV 90 FTW!!!!
@jd291 Жыл бұрын
These are nothing a javelin couldn't handle.
@Greekmilsim Жыл бұрын
Ignorant .Modern ifvs have trophy system
@ekarus4360 Жыл бұрын
modern tanks and ifvs have defeans system capably to destroy incoming antitank missles
@Greekmilsim Жыл бұрын
@@ekarus4360 and HEAT rounds
@zhufortheimpaler4041 Жыл бұрын
Puma has an active protection system fitted to defeat Missiles like Javelin. Its called MUSS.
@Greekmilsim Жыл бұрын
@@zhufortheimpaler4041 they cannot defeat a top attack
@quigonjinn3567 Жыл бұрын
Jep the Puma is the "best" in failing & being a billion Euro grave. BTW where is the BORSUK IFV ?
@ArmyEncyclopedia Жыл бұрын
The BORSUK IFV is still being tested.
@zhufortheimpaler4041 Жыл бұрын
in comparison to Borsuk, Puma has significantly heavier armor protection and more advanced weapon systems. Also Puma is in production and service, while Borsuk has a single Prototype produced.
@quigonjinn3567 Жыл бұрын
@@zhufortheimpaler4041 You should really read about the Borsuk & Puma because you got no clue what ur writing about. Holy cow where to start... The Bursuk IFV is not 1 version but a modular plattform UMPG (Uniwersalna Modułowa Platforma Gąsienicowa) for example more composite armour can be fittet BUT doing so results in a 44t vehicle loosing its amphibious ablity. A Borsuk base model only weighs 28t. While the Puma protecton lvl A weighs 31,5t BTW 5 Borsuk have been build. The prototype test phase was completed in late 2022 & the Polish army was finally satisfied with the changes made. Thus the Polish goverment ordered this FEBRUARY 1400 Borsuk. While the German GOV is WAS planing to get max 350 Pumas in TOTAL. The Puma has a traditional Continuous track while the Bursuk is using a modern & lighter & much quieter CRT (Composite rubber track) Further more the Borsuk has a hard kill APS while the Puma has only a passive one. Thats a huge deal. Borsuk's main armarment is a Mk44 Bushmaster II, this cannon has higher firerate that Pumas MK 30-2/ABM even tho both use the exact same caliber. Both IFV use also the same Israeli Spike ATGM's. The Puma can only hold 200 rounds of cannon ammo in it turret & CANNOT be rearmed from within the Puma, this is another a fatal flaw. Because labour & materials are way cheaper in Poland the Borsuk cost 10 million USD & the Puma a wopping 17 million USD ( the most expensive IFV on this planet). Both have cameras instead of pericopes. The Pumas are infact so advanced that during the lastest Bundeswehr training exercise in 2022 ALL 18 Pumas broke down.... All further production of the Puma IFV thus have been halted. Now germany wants to pull out their phased out Marder IFV again... This was just another massive scandal in Germany & every body is blaming the other why it went so terribly wrong. I could go on & on but im tires of correcting people all the time for brabbling out nonsense.
@quigonjinn3567 Жыл бұрын
@@ArmyEncyclopedia The Polish GOV just ordered 1400 Bursuk IFV in Feburary this year. Also why didn't you mention that during the lastest training exercise of the Bundeswehr, all 18 of the "Worlds best IFV" Puma broke down & all further production has been canceled? That was last year. Look it up, this Puma scandal was even News in Switzerland.
@zhufortheimpaler4041 Жыл бұрын
@@quigonjinn3567 the Pumas broke down due to lack of maintenance after serveral weeks of heavy combat training prior to that excercise. only one of the problems was severe enough that minor maintenance wouldnt have prevented it. Germany wanted to procure 750 Puma´s, the number was reduced to 350, but currently another 150 are on order. Production was continued months ago. And still Borsuk has ZERO Produced numbers right now and just a handfull of pre production prototypes.
@pawestachniewicz3493 Жыл бұрын
PL-01 CONCEPT
@jameswhyard2858 Жыл бұрын
Where is the IDF Namer?
@maciej2c Жыл бұрын
4:38 this one is disgustingly strong in A.W.
@xuanmenle5145 Жыл бұрын
Nên có thông số cơ bản:khối lượng,công suất,.v..v...
@hermosoloremalaga Жыл бұрын
I Like ASCOD from Spain (Pizarro) and Lynx.
@zodiak2171 6 ай бұрын
Correct . Leopold Tank were destroyed in Ukraine 3:21 by Russian Lancet Missile.Although German MBT Leopold was considered one to be #1 .
@jonny2954 3 ай бұрын
It's still considered #1. Ukraine losses even supported that because the vast majority of crews dismounted unharmed after being hit.
@perlundqvist7612 Жыл бұрын
CV90 cant withstand 30mm AP rounds. But it can withstand a 20kg mine.
@GreatRaphael Жыл бұрын
No Namer ? The only IFV with APS.
@zhufortheimpaler4041 Жыл бұрын
Puma has also MUSS APS
@danielmlinar4892 8 ай бұрын
Bradley at number 6 is joke😂😂
@pawestachniewicz3493 Жыл бұрын
PL-01 CONCEPT. Where is?
@zhufortheimpaler4041 Жыл бұрын
as it says in its name: concept. Not even prototype vehicles availible
@marko100skive 5 ай бұрын
puma have so many mechanical faults, loads of them are not combat operational and have a heavy maintance cost
@jonny2954 3 ай бұрын
Your information is from about 2 years ago lol
@ad220588 Жыл бұрын
🔴 I think it depends on the crew's training. I think it doesn't matter what IFV it is. You have to get the most out of your device. Above all, you have to master the electronics on board.- With no infantry to accompany you, you'll be quickly shot down with a bazooka.
@user-nv4qq4ly7p Жыл бұрын
불량품이 일위네....
@lukaskania6879 Жыл бұрын
Borsuk? Where is?
@seafirst1 Жыл бұрын
Borsuk? never tested in the field. funny polish.
@lukaskania6879 Жыл бұрын
@@seafirst1 But Rheinmetall didn't show off in Australia 😂 and Korean crap didn't pass tests in Poland. The turret from the Romans is disastrous, not to mention the chassis.
@chenmax8141 Жыл бұрын
为啥人家的迷彩都很好看，墙国的迷彩和塑料玩具一样，土
@Cemm1905 Жыл бұрын
Puma ? 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 PUMA IS ALWAYS BROKEN IS THIS A JOKE ? 😂😂🤣BEST IS TURKEY AND SOUTH KOREA👍💪
@zhufortheimpaler4041 Жыл бұрын
not really. puma´s readiiness problems primarily come from lack of proper high level maintenance. The Bundeswehr lost the majority of their own maintenance units and capability in 2010 with the MOD cutting these parts to save money in the Budget. Since then the bundeswehr struggles with readiness rates. 95% of issues with Puma are due to lack of maintenance and too high usage. The "famous" broken down 18 vehicles at the start of the year were used in heavy combat training for weeks without major maintenance and overhaul as part of the VJTF training and qualification prior to the relevant event.
@DanteGrey Жыл бұрын
god this voice is worse than the tiktok one
@luthfihar3211 Жыл бұрын
hot garbage use of decent TTS imo
@malakmo7864 Жыл бұрын
T15 Armata
@Greekmilsim Жыл бұрын
Puma better than lynx 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@zhufortheimpaler4041 Жыл бұрын
Lynx is based on Puma Technology. Puma is a joint venture between KMW and Rheinmetall, Lynx only uses the Rheinmetall components of the Puma developement. It is designed to be less sofisticated and complex and thus cheaper to produce and be more customizable for international customers.
@Greekmilsim Жыл бұрын
@@zhufortheimpaler4041 i prefer lynx
@zhufortheimpaler4041 Жыл бұрын
@@Greekmilsim fair enough. But keep in mind that lynx didnt really have time to mature. It will get its first year of service this year and we can bet on it that alot of teething issues will surface that have been ironed out on Puma already. Most AFV´s have teething problems in their first few years of service. Those show up as the fleet of in service vehicles gets larger and the sample size increases.
@hykepark4480 Жыл бұрын
email me if u want to get educated in ifvs lmfao.. you must be german. reinmetal has not been the top for a bit now ...its like china saying they have the best stealth fighters.....lol
@user-ey6oe5ox2r Жыл бұрын
Гавно эти ваши БМП в бою надо их проверить а не на полигонах
@vgtti1841 Жыл бұрын
Ales schön und gut, aber wo her nimmt ihr die, Schwach sehnigen Preise? Wie auch in den anderen Videos who ein Italienischer 8×8Viachel angeblich über 10.000.000 Millionen kosten soll? Über Prüfen Sie ihre Quellen bevor sie falsch Info verbreiten.
@ArmyEncyclopedia Жыл бұрын
According to the program for the purchase of armored vehicles 381 infantry fighting vehicle (IFV) Freccia will be purchased, co-produced by the Italian consortium Conzorzio Iveco Oto Melara. The cost of this equipment is about € 2,65 bn (USD 4.02 billion), the purchase will be carried out until 2024. 4,020,000,000$/381=10,551,181$
@Top10Military68 3 күн бұрын
AS21 Redbacks
Army Encyclopedia
Рет қаралды 53 М.
Army Encyclopedia
Рет қаралды 33 М.
Army Encyclopedia
Рет қаралды 706 М.