any day now

Be certainly in 2027 over 1000 years since the unification of England (meaning Land of the Angles as their name in their language being spelt Engle) in 927

@@jsmithmultimediatech The Accession Council of the Privy Council first met in 1603 for the accession of King James VI who also became King James I of England and Ireland. The Accession Council was further formalised by the Act of Settlement (1701) which confirmed that the Heir to the Throne immediately becomes Sovereign at the moment of death of the previous Sovereign. Although there were proclamations prior to 1603 to announce the new Sovereign, the procedure shown here dates only from 1603.

God save the King

God save the king 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧

you are all french ... charlemagne 3 lions .. normandy ...

I'm still trying to figure out how worshiping the family that conquered us, and has used us and our ancestors for nearly a thousand years to enrich themselves...is somehow being British. Our ancestors must surly be turning in their graves.

​@@spotable2they are as British as other Brits.... most Brits descend from angles, saxons, jutes ... all Germanic people

@@spotable2 Seems like you'd be surprised how many people in the past had loyalty to the monarch.

I'm still trying to figure out how worshiping the family that conquered us, and has used us and our ancestors for nearly a thousand years to enrich themselves...is somehow being British. OUR ancestors must surly be turning in their graves.@@flyingchimp12

I'm still trying to figure out how worshiping the family that conquered us, and has used us and our ancestors for nearly a thousand years to enrich themselves...is somehow being British. OUR ancestors must surly be turning in their graves.

how's that ''binding together'' working out for you?

Me too😂

British culture

If you want the ancient traditions then america has to be under brits

Brian lee et to i faut arrêter vos blablas politiques et vos monsanges bien sur I faut arrêter te profiter sé pas ley te régler vos blabla politiques et vos monsanges o puré ke des boddys et ke des hypocrites

Nice you think these traditions ancient.

@@shahedahmed4751 Do not be obtuse.

King of the UK.

@@Guitar-qv6gu But he is King of Canada too...

@@mikkelryehansen3772 cuz Canada was part of the Commonwealth Realms

@@neosaintcolumbiamapper Is part of the Commonwealth

@@keithmurphy7243 A Cult of Personality arises when an individual uses mass media, propaganda, or other methods to create an idealized, and at times, a 'god-like' and a 'goddess-like' public image, through Unquestioning Flattery and Praise. ( Deceased Elizabeth II, Charles, William, Anne, Camilla, Kate and the remaining representatives ) The old English monarchy is a CULT - LIKE institution with a very bad history. What is a CULT-? The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader. Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged. The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act and feel. The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader and members. The group has a polarized us-versus-them mentality, which may cause conflict with the wider society. The leader is extremely protected and does not give interviews. The leader is not held accountable to any authority. Unquestioning adulation is expected from the followers. Characteristics of a CULT. The Leadership Dictates, Sometimes In Great Detail, How Members Should Think, Talk, Act and Feel. Examples:- When Elizabeth was alive the following rules had to be obeyed. When she enters the room, everyone must stand. When the queen stands, you must stand. By age five, children are expected to bow or curtsy to the monarch. Bow or curtsy as she approaches. Only shake her hand if she shakes your hand first. Do not wear sunglasses outdoors if you are near her. Never address her by her first name. Only address her as your so-called majesty. Never initiate a conversation with her. She always takes the lead. She always walks ahead of everyone else. Her 'husband' always had to walk two paces behind her. Never walk in front of her. You wait for her, she never waits for you. Never turn your back on her. Never leave an event before her. Selfies are forbidden. Never start eating before her. The wearing of fur is not allowed. Never continue eating after she has finished. Keep the conversation 'light'. No personal questions about herself. Females must never sit with their legs crossed at the knee. When the royal family is part of a procession, they must enter and be seated in the order of precedence, which is essentially the order of who’s next in line to the so-called throne. The so-called royals aren’t allowed to give out autographs. Mrs Windsor was required to use her purse to send subtle social signals. When she placed her purse on the table at dinner, it meant it was time to wrap things up-so consider the bite you lifted must be your last. She was required to spend her time speaking to the person on her right for the first course, and then engage in conversation with the guest on her left for the second. The so-called English royals are not allowed to give autographs. Parliamentarians are not allowed to discuss the monarchy. The old English monarchy has a bad history and the following words would apply to it. Anachronistic, Racist, Incest, Adultery, Immorality, Tyranny, Brutality, Genocide, Slavery, Theft, Dysfunctional, Aloof, Extremely Secretive, Irrelevant, Suffocating Formality, Abnormal and a Prison - Like Lifestyle. Edward's and Simpson's allegiance to Hitler. Andrew / Epstein and Charles / Jimmy Savile. Diana's arranged / forced marriage to Charles and his horrible treatment of her. Philip and his affairs. Anne divorced. Randy divorced . Charles divorced. Camilla divorced. There is not much family stability with these people and they are a poor representation of a cohesive family. The obsessed monarchy cult followers say that the monarchy provides stability but they dont explain how it does that with regards to this family. Henry VIII divorced two of his wives and the other one was BEHEADED-! Charles II executed-! Hanged, Drawn and Quartered. The "drawing" part actually comes first and it involves the convict being tied to a type of sled that's "drawn" or dragged behind a horse all the way from the prison to the gallows. Then he was hung by a rope tied from the gallows and around his neck. After a few terrifying minutes of near-asphyxiation, the rope was cut and the man fell down. Then his penis and testicles were cut off, his bowels were pulled out, his heart was cut out and all were burned before him in a fire. Next, his abdomen was slit open from groin to sternum. His head was severed from his body and his body cut into four quarters to be disposed of at the king's pleasure. The body parts were then taken on a publicity tour and distributed to the surrounding towns as a warning to those who would challenge the authority of the king. One of the main reasons for doing all of this was to demonstrate the absolute power of the monarchy. Burning at the Stake was another awful way to be killed. Britain has a monarchical kind of government and it had five Prime Ministers in a short period of six years. Northern Ireland was without a functioning government for a period of two years. The monarchy representatives and THE OBSESSED FOLLOWERS claim that the monarchy provides stability for a government but they do not explain how it achieves the so-called stability. The so-called monarchy cult representatives, ( Charles etc ) are supposed to be apolitical and have no power and most certainly do not keep politicians in check. That is done by the voters. So in reality, the citizens have more power than the monarchy cult representatives. If you think otherwise, then when was the last time royal assent was denied-? The founding fathers of our beautiful country of America REJECTED the old cult-like English monarchy with its very evil history and ALL of us Americans need to REJECT IT AS WELL. PLEASE DO NOT FOLLOW THIS OLD CULT.

A trainee who was trained for more than 70 years, this is what we could expected from him

British King.

Sorry luv, there is no god.

No one alive has witnessed it until now. The queen was the youngest at the previous ceremony, so they are all long gone now.

Jesus Christ is light of the world and only saviour of the world.

@@joeking5310 Charles and Anne were alive of course but not present ?

@@rivenoak they were not there.

She is called Penny Mordunt and is and elected member of Parliament she very nearly was the new prime minister but unfortunately we got Liz Truss instead.

@@MrCmac731 Spelt Mordaunt. Penny Mordaunt is Leader of the House of Commons, and is also exercising her other duty here as the Lord President of the Privy Council.

Weirdly enough, she wasn’t very experienced at that time. Like she was appointed 2 days earlier when Truss made her Leader of the Commons (which this role is paired with) and she hadn’t even formally sworn in yet when this happened.

@@eelsemaj99she had been approved by Her Majesty upon Truss being received by The Queen at Balmoral. One of the Queen’s final official duties

She also carried the heavy Sword of State in front of the King as he processed from one place to another during the Coronation in May and was one of the stars of the show in a striking costume of her own devising.

Monarchy Prevents Dictatorships & Tyrants. Rather ironic when you think about it, but glorious all the same. God Save The King!

@@Theunbiasvoice Isn't monarchy a dictatorship though?

Not a coronation just a ceremony announcing that he will be king and thats why he hasnt been crowned yet

@@CheGuevara-uf4pm No the King is immediately Sovereign on the death of Her Late Majesty. The Accession Council of the Privy Council shown here is just a formalised process of what has already happened. The new Accession Day in the United Kingdom is 8th September, the day Her Late Majesty died. All these proceedings are formalised and governed by statute law with the Act of Settlement (1701). The Coronation is just another formalised process of an event that has already taken place. His Majesty is already King and has full regnal powers.

@@CheGuevara-uf4pm But he does not have to be 'crowned'. This is the legal cermony that makes him King.

@@Kings_New_Clothese This isn't the legal ceremony that made him King. He legally became King immediately at the moment of his mother's death, hence the call, "The Queen is dead! Long live the King!" This is the traditional ceremony where they do the official announcement that he has become King. It's also his first Privy Council meeting, where he can deal with official business/paperwork, e.g. ordering the proclamation of his accession to the throne to be published, taking an oath to protect the rights of the Church of Scotland (legally required by the 1707 Treaty of Union), declaring bank holidays, etc.

coronation is set on 6th may 2023

I'm still trying to figure out how worshiping the family that conquered us, and has used us and our ancestors for nearly a thousand years to enrich themselves...is somehow being British. Our ancestors must surly be turning in their graves.

Conquered? When exactly were we conquered? Last time I can think of is 1066 and that was 957 years ago...@@spotable2

You love who you love. Charles has always loved Camilla. He should not have married Diana but none of us are perfect and Diana is no longer here. I wish him and Queen Consort Camilla all the best.

@@judithwerner5301Camilla was already married by the time Charles returned He should have given up on her once she married

Charlie the cheater and CowMilla the homewrecker.

Life isn''t simple. A tragic story for all three. I wish Charles and Camilla the best and may Diana rest in peace.

Don't forget Edward vll had to do the same thing in 1901

British culture

Those ancient castles and palaces are the true testimonies built for this Royal heritage standing majestically till today.."God Save The King!"

The King was swearing an oath regarding the Church of Scotland.

@@ross6740 You keep on plastering the same comment 'British culture'. The ceremony shown here is specifically an English institution. It was formalised by the Act of Settlement (1701) in the Parliament of England, before the Acts of Union (1707) which formed Great Britain. There is a separate process in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

U r easily amused🤪

The Time will tell what great ceremony is.

I'm still trying to figure out how worshiping the family that conquered us, and has used us and our ancestors for nearly a thousand years to enrich themselves...is somehow being British. Our ancestors must surly be turning in their graves.

Im still trying to figure out how its supposed to somehow "be British" to worship the family that concurred us, and has used us and our ancestors to enrich themselves for nearly a thousand years. Our ancesters must surly be turning in their graves. @@MrBulky992

@@spotable2 If you are British, you are likely to be a descendant of Edward III and William of Normandy. Most of us are, though we don't know it. Our ancestors wanted to be ruled by successful kings because the alternative was far worse: invasion and subjugation by foreign powers, chaos, anarchy, lawlessness leading to famine and poverty. Our ancestors would not be turning in their graves as the monarchy could never have survived without popular support.

How about God save people, and god save the world from people.

people destroy

I'm still trying to figure out how worshiping the family that conquered us, and has used us and our ancestors for nearly a thousand years to enrich themselves...is somehow being British. OUR ancestors must surly be turning in their graves.

We cant do anything about them, they Own not only us but also the armed forces...but at least people could stop waving their little flags at them.@@chazboyle9456

​@@spotable2just ridiculous

King. Charles.

Well said. In effect, it’s the Law and it would be an extremely long, involved and complex process to change any of this, as it is all enshrined in law and the time it would take for both Houses in Parliament to debate everything and then vote on everything would be exhaustive, and frankly, everybody recognises that we’ve got better things to do than change timeless and beautiful ceremonies like this. I for one am very glad of that!

Are you implying it can't be both? It's both a necessary part of the constitution, and a tradition.

Mark Holtz, I truly pray that King Charles III will repent of his fleshly ways and desires, and is willing and able to rise to the occasion, in Jesus Christ's Holy Name, True Sovereign over all His created Universe, of which Earth is just 1 of infinite planets in His Cosmos. If King Charles III promises with his life and soul to serve his citizens according to Christ Jesus' will, then I, too, say: God save the King.

@@silverhills5684 he did.

😄

I suspect, although I don't know for certain, that she works for the royal household. Everyone else there is a dignitary of some kind. That's my guess, like I say

late response, however people are not requiered to bow to the king, as the day of total rule has long been gone since 1648 (office of king abolished in favour for parliment). however i believe she works for the crown and therefore may have a greater obligation to courtsey.

@@WebstaMC That would indeed be a logical explanation.

Most of the assembled are ministers of the government. Nicola Sturgeon was the First Minister of Scotland and represented the Church of Scotland as per an Act of Parliament confirming the independence of the Church of Scotland. The reason is because the Church of England is officially controlled by the King (he is the Supreme Governor), and there was uncertainty about whether the government could enact laws against the church.

Glad you think so.

@@bicycleetc9436 No thought involved, it is what it is, no matter what I think.

God save the children from him🙏

It is legally rather more than that. The king has to consent to, and sign, oaths in accordance with the Coronation Oaths Act of 1689, the Act of Settlement of 1707 and the Accession Declaration Act of 1910 otherwise Parliament can decide he should not be king. It also declares that the Privy Council, acting on behalf of the nation, is satisfied that the prospective king is the rightful heir, is a faithful Protestant and has taken the necessary oaths and is therefore accepted as the next monarch. The proclamation of the new monarch to the people only occurs when the Privy Council is satisfied.

A future prime minister

There is no such thing as the King of England, same as there’s no such thing as the President of California. How difficult is it to understand it’s the U.K. not England?!

@@sussex33 For many foreigners, it seems to be very difficult!

The last King of England was King William III, 320 years ago.

@@TheMoonRover Good for you. I get really fed up with people who say "England" when they mean the United Kingdom.

@@TheMoonRover You mean 807 years ago if you're talking about real power and a real king. King John was the last to hold absolute power. Then in June 1215, he was basically forced to sign Magna Carta and hold limited power.

Yes.

It's the way it always has been. Tradition is a great way of showing continuity but a bigger table would have been sensible.

Stop it!

Who?

@@farzeldorf Charles’s ex wife that he abused and cheated on with Camilla. Likely had her killed after the divorce

@@carole.4628 Camilla was a conniving, calculating harlot.

Sadly and indignantly, I say it should have been Diana who signed those Oaths as Witness after her son, Prince William, apparent heir to the Throne. (Instead, it was a S.O.P. Alley Cat who could not keep her vows to her first husband, Andrew Parker Bowles. How is it King Edward VIII had to abdicate the Throne after the British government, the public, and the Church of England condemned his decision to marry the American divorcée Wallis Warfield Simpson, and yet King Charles III is allowed the Throne when united to a divorcée [well-known to be an Alley Cat who destroyed a Royal, under God, virginal marriage])?? British morals have fallen. This is indecent. If it was indecent in King Edward VIII's era, it remains indecent today. The Throne should have gone to Prince William.

Beyonce Knowles the IV

Penny Mourdant, the Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons.

It would have been interesting had Jacob Rees-Mogg continued in that role.

Penny mourdant. Certainly a future prime minister, if the conservatives retains the govt

@@mic9check Omg, stopppp!🤣😅😂

King George VI was originally left handed, but in those days it was thought wrong that a member of the Royal Family should be left handed. He was forced to use his right hand, which helped to cause his stammer. It's good that some things change.

1 Peter 2:17 Honour all men. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honour the King.

How about god save people and god save the world from people.

This is how civilized, educated people behave. No riots, no thugs no criminals, no Qnan,.

KingCharlesPhipp.Phillip🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

He has not been crowned yet. The coronation is scheduled for next year.

Seriously, he's not the only person in the world to have lost a loved family member that will be followed by another one.

@@saneman8147 at least most of us doesn’t have to go through to public events that are likely celebrating the death of your love one for the next one and you having all of that while suffering and having to be a public figure. When my granny died I was completely overwhelmed by the situation at home and everyone coming around and funeral and everything and just that, while he has do to all of that in front of thousands of people, I didn’t even want to say hi to anyone during those days and I have to show gratitude and William have to go through a lot while his granny and dad will be the same.

Yes, it goes all the way back to King Charles I - during the English Civil War. He wanted to force the Scots to accept the Anglican church as the established church in Scotland. He lost that battle, and ever since all monarchs have had to swear an oath to maintain the Church of Scotland.

Well it would be if he were king of England, but he isn't. In October 1604 James VI and I decreed that he would in future be known by the style and title of King of Great Britain and not by the divided names of England and Scotland.

Golden age for humanity? Sorry but how that's so?

Alan Harrison any et to allez préparer vous i faut réparer vos péchés i faut arrêter te profiter

@@filsduzaire Go do some reading - if you can. You'll learn something.

I spotted that also.

If only Charles believed a word of the Bible