That is actually a very good idea. I am sure people looking at submarine propulsion would be extremely interested and even boats

Good question about boats.

another thing to look into is how large ships also pump air under themselves to reduce drag, could be really interesting Also for a kayak you could probably test it with a 3d-printed set of parts, would love to see that become a reality

Pump-jet on watercraft have quite a few similarities.

Tom Clancy wrote about such a submarine drive in The Hunt for Red October, in the 80's.

Glad you enjoyed it!

Saint Rutan watches over all canard aircraft. 🙏🏻

I'm with you,this is the best looking personal craft I have seen so far. Would love to do the test flight in it.

In other words you want your fat mother in law to be a test pilot just to make sure lighter loads can be carried with a HUGE margin of safety ?

@@WilliamRNicholsonLST-1195 As the old saying goes: better safe than sorry. I proudly state that I am Old School and reject the new-fangled 'Risk Assessment' approach for the tried & true 'Risk Avoidance' approach.

This might make an interesting motorcycle drive system. Very inexpensive compared to a geared system.

@@pauld6967 Watching the 6 month planned Inspiration4, which set numerous records for humanity, implemented quite a few large-scale never-done-before changes... like the Cupola in place of docking capabilities, gave me a new found respect for the modern way.

@@pauld6967 lmao what are you talking about? Firstly, risk assessment and risk avoidance are fundamentally the same, they avoid unnecessary risk. Secondly, there's no reason for safety to not progress on the principal of clinging to obsolete tradition. You're welcome to stay in the past if you want to, that comes at the expense of innovation and progress. The rest of the world will be just fine moving on without you. It's always weird to see someone who would rather kneecap themselves over tradition that has little to no value. Pride is a strange thing.

Welcome aboard! and thank you son much. With the amount of research that goes into every video, its difficult for me to churn them out every week. I can do videos every fortnight

Let me know if that idea takes off. 😁

Spinny you are a sick puppy ,let me know if it works

YA, I'm looking at my Dyson fan right now, cool beans

I'm only here to see if I can use this tech on my eboard.

@Muckin 4on haha Your not working fancy electronic crap nearly burnt your house down 3 phase brushless motors should be ancient and I am also amazed that a Chinese company hasn't......

Exactly, That's the basics, they just use wordplay.

yeah they dont have to worry about getting shredded by a propeller blade but still have to worry about getting hit by a plane going 300 mph

@@mason2699 I would guess that the forces of going though would lead to death..

Birds would probably be ripped apart by the high pressure air. Also the compressor needs some kind of intake.

So more ducted fans using bypass air. Nothing new under the sun.

Thank you kindly!

Haha!!!

Exactly - we all have different speeds and styles of learning. Simplest is always best - for everyone.

It seems that certification for human flight is super difficullt. There has been quite a few flying taxi projects. So far none has been granted human flight certification. None even from China, Dubai or Singapore. It has a long long road ahead.

@@catchnkill sounds like a conspiracy..."big air" is keeping us in a tube with the masses. 😆

i would have thought coanda.

coandah worked on the outside.. Bernouli worked inside a manifold.. but they are the same ideas derived from observations.. and measurements.. science is all about measuring the Universe we live in.. if you don't see the math It's not science.. ...

now.. think about a personal sized dirigible.. can land anywhere, even water.. with solar cells printed on the skin.. and a neutral buoyancy from helium... with palladium instead of aluminum.. it's almost impossible to melt as AuPd.. lighter than aluminum.. stronger than steel... steel has a density of 7.7.. palladium starts as 8.8.. it's like plastic steel.. mixed with gold... and it is definitely lighter than aluminum and I am not sure how .. it's a measurable phenomenon that happens each time I make AuPd

it's not rare or hard to find... it's going to Change the World

first up.. palladium foil 1m³ helium balloons .. many.. and a 7.5 m² parachute to hold them together.. silk and shellac create a very strong bio plastic for the outside... and.. the pilot seat.. to see what happens... I am working on it now

You are very welcome

Lol. Are you saying that to make him feel better about his thick Indian accent that is hard to understand?

Laminar flow were used for some WW2 fighters so...

How can you have laminar flow when you need highly compress air jet mixing with ambient air to generate flow induction? This is nonsense they are just stringing together buzzwords to fool investors.

@David S. both laminar flow and turbulators were developed simultaneously. Both seem to have dropped into the background

Glad you enjoyed it!

Much appreciated!

Too bad it doesn't work as described.

I hope so too!

So I take it you have never seen many youtube videos

its still an aircraft so you would have to plan and deal with airports and controlled airspaces

Duh... We all have accents. Why couldn't he be successful?

Don’t get out much?

then you should do more research on it or work for the company

USING AS MANY CAPITAL LETTERS IN YOUR COMMENTS ALWAYS HELPS YOU GET WHAT YOU WANT. ADDING AN EXCLAMATION MARK WAS A NICE TOUCH TOO! WAY TO GO!

Or watch that guy the fly with 4 of this engines attached to his hands which btw weights 10x times more thant a paper plane .. lol research

@@norisarabio7307 what are you talking about?

TOTALLY AGREED @@unitrobe0 ! S O M E T I M E S I E V E N L I K E T O M I X I T U P A L I T T L E B I T F O R E X T R A E M P H A S I S ; H A V E Y O U T R I E D T H A T ? ! ! !

Lol 'Rooting' in Australian English has a VERY different meaning! (It means to have sex) 😂🇦🇺

It's a fake

@@ronaldharris6569 Fake is a bit rough; I'd say mock up. The only thing visibly flying well is the model powered by ducted fans.

just as concept.

@Jimmy Bond lol? its a known effect and there are tons on solutions using it. but it wasts energy son in general its complicated and pointless. but there are a lot of devices like that/ look at any iphone)

This video should be sent to all STEM schools. The WOW factor could inspire students to study physics and a variety of engineering subjects.

@@bikebrains another person posed the idea of making a smaller bladeless system for a boat, imagine a bunch of STEM students designing, printing and using a system like that on a kayak via 3d printing.

@@bikebrains To learn how not to do it?

It works the same on my blow up doll

Самолёт команды не взлетел проще говоря такого самолёта не существует

Thanks, will do!

Each time I heard it, that is what I heard. Jet of terror.

@@MusicEchos 🤣

Thank you. I have since corrected that mistake in my subsequent videos

I hope so too!

shinmawa US2 stol seaplane , also uses a turbine for force assist flow over flaps ,

Those systems were low airspeed lift augmentation designs and horribly inefficient. They did their job, though.

That's why they cleverly don't claim that. If you listen carefully they claim to be superior to small jets system. I imagine it's pointing to small ducted fans like E-fan airbus electric plane, or small turbo jets. Not propellers. The entrainment causes more flow around the motor so more lift for the box. I think it's a good compromise of compacity and efficiency and safety against multirotors or tilting multirotor + small wings.

Maybe sometime someone makes this effect into the wing itself so the whole surface is both propulsion and lift. Also this plane has a rather small intake at the top, this might be the limiting factor for its total power.

Actually, entrainment experiments 100 years ago in Scotland using solid rockets to give the core gas stream, showed a thrust amplification of around ten. The idea is to tailor the exit speed of the mixed flow so that it leaves the rear of the aircraft at exactly the same speed that the aircraft is moving forward: thus, the exiting flow leaves with zero speed relative to the atmosphere so has zero wasted kinetic energy remaining in the exhaust. Ergo, big improvement in efficiency.

@@richardm.newlands2417 is that related to aerospikes? But also that would work only for cruising speed not acceleration.

@@richardm.newlands2417 If the exhaust has zero airspeed as it leaves it will also have zero thrust!

Much appreciated!

What !!!!

I appreciate that!

Dyson bladeless fans are louder than cheap fans.

Dyson claims 60-70% nose reduction for their fans vs. Blades

@@myotherusername9224 at minimum speed vs blade fans at maximum. When full fledged they're noisy AF and don't even blow that much air

Needs lots of investors

Look for it In 👉1930 👇 Henri Coanda build the first UFO and he call it: AerodineLenticulare .

Many technologies have been out for many years but we just couldn't make them into a viable product due to our limited understanding. Once the right breakthrough is achieved and financial backing is secured can it materialize to something. Note that this can happen multiple times until said product is commercially viable. (VR comes to mind). We see this in science too. We're aware of quantum physics for a hundred years and our most brilliant minds have been working on it since, yet this is still the case: "If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics."

@@aarona5522 it wasn’t a fucking UFO if you know exactly what it was 😂

Aah jetex, a source of joy nearly 70 years ago!

@@geoffnottage8894 perhaps a point on Jetex fuel - it used Nitroguanidine, made from bat shit and nitric acid, if I remember right

Our pleasure!

it is supposedly meant to increase lift on the wings... at least that's what it looks like to me.

Just a picky note: you meant "skeptic". Sceptic means a blood infection.

@@2degucitas maybe thats what he meant, maybe he has a blood infection

I am a sceptic :-) but not septic. Sceptical I get, when I hear the sound of jet pumps turned inside out....

@@doctor_moodm9536 Which makes the cartoon of using them as VTOL lifters dodgy.

Yup

As much as I like him debunking stuff, dude has a big hate boner with alright projects like from TESLA and SpaceX. Otherwise, he's an alright skeptic. It just gets annoying when he does it again and again.

@@RandomnessCreates i stopped watching the dude years ago because hed make the video after video on the same idea with slightly different words or order of pictures. not only that, but he would repeat the same point 4 times in a single video.

LOL, he'd hate on anything he comes across :D funny chap

@@vanguard6937 yeah, he became unwatchable pretty quickly.

doesn't work.

Often "startup" companies do just that. Feed you some serious 'crap' while getting a crap idea to partially demonstrate, then fleece dumb investors, flounder, and act like they don't know what happened with the 'new technology' not working out. Oh yeah, all while the founders make millions on failed ideas.

Sounds like a crappy way to travel.

@@life_of_riley88 And fanboys keep drumming the thing further. Like with this video, hey look electric flying car! It can easily be made electric... when battery technology advances further.. so not in several decades and i would be even less interested in this flying coffin than EV, since with EV you wont probably... maybe die when batteries crap out.. with this yeah no.. With jet engine this might have some sense, but vtol is always hard thing to build since you need lots of computers to assist even professional pilot.. One computer crapping out can easily lead disaster with vtol. Also as mentioned duckted fans are now flying the test platform, but we have no idea what ever this actually works in real world aircraft and will it be powerful and practical enough. Its interesting concept, just hate how EV fanboys start drumming for shit like this, even before there is model version flying and even then scaled weight of the aircraft seems to be forgotten on test for looks of it.

@@life_of_riley88 Tesla being one of the best modern examples of this lmao

@@Hellsong89 What do you mean "like with this video"? The video is fairly informational and doesn't act like the technology is right around the corner. The guy isn't drumming anything up. I get how annoying the current tech climate is with people like Musk and his cult but that doesn't make it a good idea to take the polar opposite stance. Yes, the technology is being looked into. That's all the video really says while breaking it down into examples how how the tech is used today as well as proofs of concept in the past. Nothing wrong with taking a look at previously mothballed technology with a fresh pair of eyes as long as no one's being conned, which this video doesn't appear to be attempting to do.

It has a lot of moving parts there just inside the plane..

everything falls in a downdraft. gliders fall at highspeeds just not straight down. Quite often you have to go through vacuous situ's and gliders cant get around walls going 300K/h. This heavily excercised systme is rigorously designed not to stop and to always have enoigh fuel. So maybe its the safest of all concepts?

​@@addisonlanier4226 The same claims about design rigour and procedures can be said for any other conventional aircraft, yet there are still protocols in place for what happens when the power fails. It's not just about having enough fuel. Few aircraft run out of fuel in the air. Sometimes it's a maintenance issue or a bird strike or a number of other things that kills the engine(s). I don't see how something like this is any less susceptible to problems than conventional aircraft and therefore I don't see how it can be safe without unpowered landing capability. "It probably won't happen" is not good enough.

Yeah it looks like that but these motors would have to deliver exponentially more power / thrust than its Dyson counterpart.

@@Ben7seven7 doesn't sound useful then, if it requires more work

Welcome to startups!

@@nicholasfinch4087 everything worth it requires effort or waiting for someone else's effort

Scale it up!!!

So nice of you

Ｒ　Ｅ　Ｎ　Ｄ　Ｅ　Ｒ　　Ｖ　Ｉ　Ｄ　Ｅ　Ｏ

@@DartTyler Biggest red flag

Fully agree. If this "multiplies flow", then just route the output of one such "jet" back into itself, or through a chain of them, and voila - infinite energy. This might be just another of those beautifully-rendered graphics presentation.

@@markozagar The catch to that, in practice, is that flow multiplication relies on high pressure at the intake, and low pressure at the output. If you create a circular chain of these, then taking an arbitrary start/end point along the circle, the pressure will be LOWER at the intake of your "start" point than at the outlet, because the pressure will consistently drop across each propulsor in the loop. Kinda like the time zones need to reset at the International Date Line because they can't keep going backwards forever. So the physics of the idea is sound, but putting them in a loop to create infinite energy is not.

@@markozagar The issue is that this kind of device is great for moving air around a room and for propelling a model aircraft, but the physics does not scale up very well. Doing something like this for propulsion of an aircraft that can carry a person would use way more power than a conventional propeller that's electrically driven. I just cannot see something like this being efficient enough to knock other modes of propulsion of their throne.

🍷😆

A drone built on this technology would be really interesting.