A-10 Thunderbolt II Warthog | History, Controversy And Unknown Facts | Full Documentary

  Рет қаралды 182,312

DroneScapes

DroneScapes

Ай бұрын

FULL DOCUMENTARY: Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II "Warthog" attack aircraft: the untold story, the history, and things you might not know about one of the most loved and most hated aircraft in history.
The Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II is a single-seat, twin-turbofan, straight-wing, subsonic attack aircraft developed by Fairchild Republic for the United States Air Force (USAF). In service since 1976, it is named for the Republic P-47 Thunderbolt, a World War II-era fighter bomber effective at attacking ground targets, but commonly referred to as the "Warthog" or "Hog". The A-10 was designed to provide close air support (CAS) to friendly ground troops by attacking armored vehicles, tanks, and other enemy ground forces; it is the only production-built aircraft designed solely for CAS to have served with the U.S. Air Force. Its secondary mission is to direct other aircraft in attacks on ground targets, a role called forward air controller-airborne; aircraft used primarily in this role are designated OA-10.
The A-10 was intended to improve the performance and firepower of the Douglas A-1 Skyraider. Its airframe was designed for durability, with measures such as 1,200 pounds (540 kg) of titanium armor to protect the cockpit and aircraft systems, enabling it to absorb damage and continue flying. Its ability to take off and land from relatively short runways permits operation from airstrips close to the front lines, and its simple design enables maintenance with minimal facilities.
The A-10A single-seat variant was the only version produced, though one pre-production airframe was modified into the YA-10B twin-seat prototype to test an all-weather night-capable version. In 2005, a program was started to upgrade the remaining A-10A aircraft to the A-10C configuration, with modern avionics for use with precision weaponry. The U.S. Air Force had stated the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II would replace the A-10 as it entered service, but this remains highly contentious within the USAF and in political circles. With various upgrades and wing replacements, the A-10's service life can be extended to 2040; the service has no planned retirement date as of June 2017.
General characteristics
Crew: 1
Length: 53 ft 4 in (16.26 m)
Wingspan: 57 ft 6 in (17.53 m)
Height: 14 ft 8 in (4.47 m)
Wing area: 506 sq ft (47.0 m2)
Airfoil: NACA 6716 root, NACA 6713 tip
Empty weight: 24,959 lb (11,321 kg)
Gross weight: 30,384 lb (13,782 kg)
CAS mission: 47,094 lb (21,361 kg)
Anti-armor mission: 42,071 lb (19,083 kg)
Max takeoff weight: 50,000 lb (22,700 kg)
Fuel capacity: 11,000 lb (4,990 kg) internal
Powerplant: 2 × General Electric TF34-GE-100A turbofans, 9,065 lbf (40.32 kN) thrust each
Performance
Maximum speed: 381 kn (439 mph, 706 km/h) at sea level, clean
Cruise speed: 300 kn (340 mph, 560 km/h)
Stall speed: 120 kn (138 mph, 220 km/h) at 30,000 lb (14,000 kg)
Never exceed speed: 450 kn (518 mph, 833 km/h) at 5,000 ft (1,500 m) with 18 Mark 82 bombs
Combat range: 220 nmi (250 mi, 400 km) CAS mission, 1.88 hour loiter at 5,000 ft (1,500 m), 10 min combat
Ferry range: 2,240 nmi (2,580 mi, 4,150 km) with 50 knots (58 mph; 26 m/s) headwinds, 20 minutes reserve
Service ceiling: 45,000 ft (13,700 m)
Rate of climb: 6,000 ft/min (30 m/s)
Wing loading: 99 lb/sq ft (482 kg/m2)
Thrust/weight: 0.36
Armament
Guns: 1× 30 mm (1.18 in) GAU-8/A Avenger rotary cannon with 1,174 rounds
Hardpoints: 11 (8× under-wing and 3× under-fuselage pylon stations) with a capacity of 16,000 lb (7,260 kg), with provisions to carry combinations of:
Rockets:
4× LAU-61/LAU-68 rocket pods (each with 19×/7× Hydra 70 mm/APKWS rockets, respectively)
6× LAU-131 rocket pods (each with 7× Hydra 70 rockets)
Missiles:
2× AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missiles for self-defense
6× AGM-65 Maverick air-to-surface missiles
Bombs:
Mark 80 series of unguided 'iron' bombs or
Mk 77 incendiary bombs or
BLU-1, BLU-27/B, CBU-20 Rockeye II, BL755 and CBU-52/58/71/87/89/97 cluster bombs or
Paveway series of Laser-guided bombs or
Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) (A-10C) or
Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser
Other:
SUU-42A/A Flares/infrared decoys and chaff dispenser pod or
AN/ALQ-131 or AN/ALQ-184 ECM pods or
Lockheed Martin Sniper XR or Litening targeting pods or
2× 600 US gal (2,300 L) Sargent Fletcher drop tanks for increased range/loiter time.
Avionics
AN/AAS-35(V) Pave Penny laser tracker pod (mounted beneath right side of cockpit) for use with Paveway LGBs (currently the Pave Penny is no longer in use
Head-up display (HUD)
Anti-armor mission: 252 nmi (290 mi; 467 km) with sea-level penetration and exit, 30 min combat.
#a10 #warthog #a10warthog

Пікірлер: 154
@dlkline27
@dlkline27 10 күн бұрын
I worked for Fairchild in Hagerstown, MD from '77 to '83 while the A-10 program was underway. I know about all the survivability features built into that aircraft. There is no way a multi-role aircraft can be equipped with those or have the maneuverability to provide the cover for ground troops that the A-10 provides, not to mention that awesome GAU-8 cannon. Another employee, who happened to have been an ex-bomber pilot in the AF, told me the A-10 could carry more ordinance than a B-17. I'd like to see the multi-role fighter that can do that. This video was sure an eye opener. I never knew the Air Force brass was so adamant about killing the A-10 program. I'd also like to mention, the company name was Fairchild Republic during the A-10 program. Republic built the fuselage and wing center section in Farmingdale, Long Island, NY. Hagerstown built the wing outer panels and the empennage. The wing outer panels were transported to Farmingdale to be mated to the wing center section, then the wings, fuselage and wing center section were shipped to Hagerstown for final assembly and flight testing. In spite of this awkward method, the end result was one terrific ground support aircraft.
@garylyons3036
@garylyons3036 Ай бұрын
I clearly remember the first time I called an A 10 in on target felt like GOD came down from heaven and turned everything into dust that went on forever I was in love with the Hog.
@bobschmidt3610
@bobschmidt3610 6 күн бұрын
Thank You for your service, and Thank God there was an A-10 to answer that call! I am a civilian that is in love with the A-10
@CRUZER1800
@CRUZER1800 Ай бұрын
Probably the Best A-10 doc on the Net... A must see... Russ
@theccpisaparasite8813
@theccpisaparasite8813 7 күн бұрын
½ through and look greats
@rlicon1970
@rlicon1970 Ай бұрын
The USAF brass still hate the A-10 As prior Airman I love it. One of my favorites.
@packrat76
@packrat76 12 күн бұрын
Probably because they are attached to the Army, overlooking the trenches. 😂
@davidelliott5843
@davidelliott5843 10 күн бұрын
The simple solution- move the A-10s to army control - is a perfect dilemma for the airforce brass. Keep A-10 and keep the finances and people involved. Let the army take the A-10 fleet and you lose that control.
@charlesarnold4059
@charlesarnold4059 10 күн бұрын
​@davidelliott5843 the Army was offered the A-10 in the 80s. They don't want the responsibility of training for and maintaining a single fixed wing aircraft.
@QuantumChance
@QuantumChance 8 күн бұрын
@@davidelliott5843 They didn't want the A10 anyways so your point is moot. They were continually forced by congress (you know that thing you all think is stupid and inept) to keep the A10 which became so outdated it literally has no use outside of murdering entrenched goat herders armed with AKs and RPGs. A10 survivability was far worse than its counterpart the F111 in Desert Storm, so it's not like you can say it saved pilot's lives either. It was a good aircraft and deterrent for a small window of its life but because big gun make little man peepee hard, we had to keep it for far far longer than it was even viable.
@user-en9zo2ol4z
@user-en9zo2ol4z 6 күн бұрын
The soldiers on the ground would love them more than any of us could imagine, like a cavalry showing up and charging.
@ronaldderonde
@ronaldderonde Ай бұрын
1985,I was standing on an Hilltop in Germany nearby Spagdelem airbase. An A-10 was flying around the Hill,very close could see the face of the pilot. Was a wow moment we will never forget. Slowly passing by,what a beautifull peace of machinery.
@rlicon1970
@rlicon1970 Ай бұрын
I was stationed at Hahn AB just up the road from you. I had a friend at Spang.
@andrewvare3173
@andrewvare3173 Ай бұрын
Most epic plane. Ever.
@paulgarden3818
@paulgarden3818 2 күн бұрын
I think the A10 is one of the coolest looking planes, hands down!
@uberrox452
@uberrox452 8 күн бұрын
I love this aircraft. I do believe it's my favorite aircraft for close air support.
@juice6459
@juice6459 Ай бұрын
Thanks, I enjoyed the video, especially the deep dive into the people involved in theA-10 development and their influence on future weapons testing. Not a big fan of the military industrial complex but what works, works, cannot argue.
@jamesmccormick6122
@jamesmccormick6122 7 күн бұрын
Most video's about the A-10, fail to mention that ALL A-10's, were given to The Air National Guard. USAF has tried to take back the A-10, so they could kill the program. When they saw the effectiveness they tried again to take it back, they failed. Still today all A-10's pilots are flown by Air Guard pilots.
@MrBubba123bubba
@MrBubba123bubba 10 күн бұрын
God I miss this job. 74th Fight Squadron. World Famous Flying Tigers.
@drphiliplock
@drphiliplock 21 күн бұрын
An Excellent documentary. Should make a movie of the interservice rivalry in developing the A10
@user-lu4qm3cs8i
@user-lu4qm3cs8i Ай бұрын
The A-10 is by far my favorite fighter plane of them all. The P-47 Flying Tiger is a close 2nd.
@evryhndlestakn
@evryhndlestakn Ай бұрын
I was going to say that☹️.....you were first though. 😀👍and that still leaves me the A4 Skyhawk, the A7 Vought Corsair, the Douglas A-1 Skyraider, the F16 Fighting Falcon, the......
@packrat76
@packrat76 12 күн бұрын
The Ju 87 bears mentioning.
@evryhndlestakn
@evryhndlestakn 12 күн бұрын
@@packrat76 your so right. With the inclusion of a psychological terror device.
@1DEADBEEF1
@1DEADBEEF1 8 күн бұрын
​@packrat76 ju 87 and even more - the sturmovik IL2 - the first successful plane with the armored bathtub protecting crew and fuel - the bathtub was acrually made structural/loadbearing to save weight. Main armament were two 23mm autocannons
@cahoonm
@cahoonm 12 күн бұрын
Thank you. This was so educational. We live in era of 100 million dollar jets. The guy on the ground bed a tank butter. I have personal experience with AF guys on projects an d heart broke to to know they whereabout themselves, not the tax payer. There are real heroes in this documentary.
@MayheM_72
@MayheM_72 Ай бұрын
When I was a kid in the 80s I wanted to fly the A-10 SO BAD! Unfortunately, I don't have 20/20 vision, which dashed my hopes. My Dad was an artillery captain, so I look at the A-10 as "Arial artillery".
@crankychris2
@crankychris2 8 күн бұрын
Yes, with the front cannon it would seem like that. The second time bombs or missiles would be used, doing even more damage. I wonder if the F35 will be as adept in flying 150-300 Kts below 10,000ft altitude.
@MichaelWall-lb2cc
@MichaelWall-lb2cc 2 күн бұрын
Phenomenonal!! So good I thank you so much for this!!! Wow! I grew up watching exclusively, first and foremost, the Military Channel, then History Chnl, then Science Channel, and sometimes H2 or H Intnatnl', and didn't much deviate from those. Otherwise working for my Father, retired Green Beret and Veitnam vet who growing up was a C.P.A. with his own firm. Mowing yards had 10-12 a week by age 10 in 4th, 5th grade. Working on a friends farm much as possible which was a good chunk of 7-14, baseball, football, track, did C.A.P.... And read, a LOT of books specifically on History and History of Warfare as Dad had bookshelves of non fiction warfare literature... This, brought me back to a time in my life that was truly great. Truly blessed. And grateful for my parents for, influencing my self inspired passion for challenges, betterment, and uplifting and encouraging my fellow Man... I really needed this. So very much and I didn't know how, much I really am just, way to God damn hard on myself...For not saving the world already as if its my duty and responsibility...And I realize there's a lot to love and I do and have done some pretty amazing things... Furthermore... I am not alone, "We Few..." are not few, but quite large in number, I see.. I know this may see self infatuating here.. But I see it... And through the nostalgia I received here. Had a moment to really do some introspection, much needed.. God bless you for this, my friend... Words may not convey the gratitude and appreciation I have for stumbling across your content.... Very well put together. VERY pro America, and pro American Soldier. While also remaining unbiased... You're a Gentleman and a Scholar sir. Thank you. Sincerely, Good Hunting, & always, Godspeed!¡! ~/\/\/~
@crankychris2
@crankychris2 8 күн бұрын
The brass hates the A10, but pilots love them. Numerous pilots stories about returning from missions with severe damage but the pilot alive and well. Ground troops loved them too.
@WeCube1898
@WeCube1898 4 күн бұрын
A 10 is like 1911 😊
@neilfoss8406
@neilfoss8406 29 күн бұрын
Nobody mentioned the significance of ballistic coefficient factor of the high density depleted uranium on top of the burning like magnesium and self sharpening characteristics. Muzzle energy of the .460 Weatherby magnum is 2,500 foot pounds greater than the muzzle energy of .340 Weatherby magnum Lapua As the two bullets reach 600 yards their foot pound energy will be equal. At 1000 yards the .340 Lapua bullet hits with 1800 more foot pounds of energy than the .460 does at 1000 yards. If I remember right the .340 caliber Speer Lapua step boat tail bullet(above mentioned)has the highest ballistic coefficient that I know of. At .910 it's twice as high as the next closest bullet. If anyone knows the ballistic coefficient of the 30mm depleted uranium round used in the GAU 8 rotary cannon I would be very greatful to know. I'm sure the high density high coefficient on top of the self sharpening and metal burning characteristics are the reasons this GAU 8 cannon has been so successful in the A-10. I'll bet Hans Ulrick Rudel would have choose to use one if he could have. If there is anyone who doesn't know of this German WWII Stuka pilot who flew 2500 combat missions mostly over Russia was shot down many times was credited with sinking a cruiser or a battle ship and hundreds if not thousands of tanks with his preferred twin 37mm cannons mounted to his Stuka. He even survived the war
@evryhndlestakn
@evryhndlestakn 12 күн бұрын
Yeah, I'm afraid I have to despise the use of depleted uranium unfortunately. In terms of warfare it has its place but eventually even the longest wars end. Children come in contact with the remnants of exploded warheads & play with the dull grey poison of depleted Uranium. It lies in fields that will be intended for growing various crops & it finds its way into the water table. It harms civilians mostly & a civilian under a dictator could be as against their country's regime as the invading force. If they finally find freedom from the dictator & regime then they easily find themselves confined by miseries equally bad or worse with the very real chance of cancer, leukemia & birth defects among other things. Rarely are children combatants & always without a clear understanding of the ramifications or reality if they become combatants. Depleted Uranium is yet another remnant of war left behind, forgotten & giving a lie to any possibility that any conflict could have been to give the civilian population a better life.
@1DEADBEEF1
@1DEADBEEF1 8 күн бұрын
Hans urlich rudel was also a hardcore nazi, after the war he was the Founder of relief organization for Nazi war criminals Neo-Nazi activist Election candidate from the extremist German Reich Party He even sheltered dr mengele
@FastSloW-qt8xf
@FastSloW-qt8xf 2 күн бұрын
Definitely everybody on the grounds favorite
@kellybowen6031
@kellybowen6031 22 күн бұрын
That thing is sweet
@MadMan_123
@MadMan_123 18 сағат бұрын
Govt: the army is cooking up a cooler aircraft than you Airforce: "oh he'll nah" *some time later Airforce: you get an a10 you get an a10 you get an a10
@markdavis2475
@markdavis2475 Ай бұрын
I've got a copy of Flight International showcasing the A10's release. Wonderful cutaway drawings.
@SpearFisher85
@SpearFisher85 Ай бұрын
First like?? May you be blessed with many more!
@benguyer4071
@benguyer4071 2 күн бұрын
This my brother favorite aircraft, he even got the chance to work on them.
@jackperson3626
@jackperson3626 4 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes 4 күн бұрын
THANK YOU 🙏
@Toll_Booth_Willie
@Toll_Booth_Willie Ай бұрын
If the general doesn’t want the A10 then the general’s must serve along the ground troops they command.
@canoaslan1011
@canoaslan1011 Ай бұрын
What for, they have a more important mission, serving the aircraft companies that didnt build the A10
@davidporter7051
@davidporter7051 Күн бұрын
Dumb comment. In the first Gulf War the F-111 was a far superior tank killer and CAS. This "documentary" is a pure fluff propaganda piece.
@mreastvegasryancarter8409
@mreastvegasryancarter8409 8 күн бұрын
Im sure some of the armored vehicles i have fired upon during convoy ops at Nellis AFB Silver Flag Alpha range (this range is now retired, unfortunately) were quite possibly leftovers from this massive tank army. Thats fkn awesome. Thank you guys for all you did for this program from the beginning and into the future. Semper Rah
@dennistsubaki1591
@dennistsubaki1591 Ай бұрын
around 57:45 video/audio is garbled. Congress should have given A-10 a large budget to continue research into upgrading designs and research into air/spacecraft armor & deflection technologies against ballistic & radiation weapons. High tech planes are to take out tracking & anti-aircraft tech, maintain air superiority and cover our helicopters, Harriers & A-10s, which in turn cover CAS/Transport/Supply/Special Ops for our ground troops. Modify air flow around A-10 nose & fuselage to disperse gunsmoke away from pilot & engines.Maybe add an armored computer coordinated mini-CIWS on top & bottom to cover incoming missile/drone attacks. Will have to reconfigure entire aircraft for best aircraft performance, survivability & mission success. If the experts approve any upgrades to the A-10,,have NSA watch & stop system of organized saboteurs.
@adrianmonk4440
@adrianmonk4440 4 күн бұрын
That is a TOTALLY BOSS plane. Talk about BANG for the BUCK.
@montanagetaway6175
@montanagetaway6175 3 күн бұрын
Air Force is the Army's Taxi service. Army and Marines should make and fly their own A10 or its replacement. Great show on its history!
@frankh.5378
@frankh.5378 19 күн бұрын
Not always true. In WW2, island hopping by the Maines and army killed too much of our men. Not to mention atomic bomb did end the war.
@davidelliott5843
@davidelliott5843 10 күн бұрын
USA bomber brass were so self-indoctrinated by their big bomber theology they actually refused to fit drop tanks to P-47 Thunderbolts. The aircraft had everything needed except the actual tanks which were left mouldering back Stateside.
@WeCube1898
@WeCube1898 4 күн бұрын
Why not give the A 10 program to the Army and Marines as well as the appropriate budget since the AF don't want to do it.
@mohammedcohen
@mohammedcohen 11 күн бұрын
...in 1978, I used'ta see flatbed trailers traveling west on I80 in Paterson, NJ with the fuselage (on one trailer) and the entire wing assembly9on the second trailer) going to the assemble point in Maryland...ca 1977 I went to the(IIRC nationals) IMPS convention in Farmingdale, LI, across the street from Republic Aviation...they showed two demo film of the testing that had been done to the A10..one as a demo of the titanium tub that surrounded the pilot - they tested a Soviet ZSU four barreled cannon at extremely close range against it - the only visible damage were burn/splatter marks where the round had impacted against the armor...the second film was on the GAU 30 - it's operation and a closeup of the huge 30mm rounds...seriously impressive to me...
@koreycowan1976
@koreycowan1976 7 күн бұрын
This is the best Aircraft for ground troop support.... the A-10 has saved many lives. Also caused many men to hide in 😨 fear. This plane will go down in history as a WAR BIRD to be reconed with.
@WeCube1898
@WeCube1898 4 күн бұрын
The Flying Machine Gun 😊
@bradizorsum2904
@bradizorsum2904 20 күн бұрын
True dudes.
@jeffreyhelman-ow8nj
@jeffreyhelman-ow8nj 7 күн бұрын
Sounds like we don't need a new plane, we need new generals.
@theccpisaparasite8813
@theccpisaparasite8813 7 күн бұрын
Great argument for re-integrating the Ir Force into the Army
@KnutHelberg
@KnutHelberg 13 күн бұрын
I would like to see a new analysis of a new need for a groundsupport aircraft, taking into account drone technology...
@user-gr9tz5tm4f
@user-gr9tz5tm4f 2 күн бұрын
I want a t shirt, having the hog on an attack angle on a tank. On the back of the shirt i want this phrase, A10 Worlds best can opener!
@olsonspeed
@olsonspeed 7 күн бұрын
The A-10's record has proven it was right aircraft for Close Air Support
@peterbustin2683
@peterbustin2683 4 күн бұрын
1:18:37 Pilot fires minigun. 1:18:44 Target soils themselves...!
@UnderThreatNationNews5.0
@UnderThreatNationNews5.0 Ай бұрын
During the ground march ,why don't they have tanks out front before the ground troop marching to a town? Minimizing casualties on the ground. This is why you want your tank out front before the ground movement. The Abrams are either the Bradley. Tanks, should it be out front?
@mutantryeff
@mutantryeff Ай бұрын
You ignored the fact that most generals are political appointees that don't actually think.
@evryhndlestakn
@evryhndlestakn Ай бұрын
That's Generalizing a bit don't you think? Not majorly but in general terms I mean.
@canoaslan1011
@canoaslan1011 Ай бұрын
@@evryhndlestakn its in the name, they are Generally just General. all jokes aside, no general becomes a general because they cant or do t think. The truth is, by the time they become a general, They are probably thinking too much, Not just the goals of their mission, now more than before, they are more selfish, and care more about their Political status, and economical benefits they get, from the aircraft companies. at the end of the day, they are just Lobbiest just in a Military form. and just like the scum of the world Lobbiest. They will say and do anything, for financial gain, regardless of how bad it is for the people, and how negative their affects are.
@mikect500
@mikect500 Ай бұрын
Actually you are correct but it is an even worse situation than you portray. At the height of WWII with 12 million people in uniform we had 8 four star officers in the whole military. Now, with 1.5 million in uniform we have 45. Every one gets at least a 40 person staff and millions for a budget for their own office. When guys like Schwarzkopf and Powell went before congressional boards to get promoted to field grade officer positions they were asked questions like "how did Rommel screw up in North Africa" or "How did Montgomery screw up in Holland". Also back in the day pretty much every candidate had to have had combat experience. Nowadays, starting with Obama, the candidates are asked "how will you integrate body positive thesbians (with a "L") into the units and where will you save money on procurement and training to pay for transmission medical procedures? And of course actually leading troops in battle is not really wanted anymore.
@evryhndlestakn
@evryhndlestakn Ай бұрын
@@mikect500 that should be a concern.
@mikect500
@mikect500 Ай бұрын
@@evryhndlestakn why do you think that we are pretending that women are warriors? The Chinese, Russians and North Koreans want us to, especially China pushing it on tictok. A current Navy official recruiter is a bisesual cross dresser and the Navy uses that as an incentive to join.
@GaryProffitt-pt2go
@GaryProffitt-pt2go Ай бұрын
The Warthog that kills the strengthened tanks, amazing.
@user-en9zo2ol4z
@user-en9zo2ol4z Ай бұрын
Pierre Sprey, was an unsung hero of the time. His involvement and cooperation with so called, 'fighter Mafia' was instrumental in significant improvement in the face of USAF intransigence.
@grantcox4764
@grantcox4764 11 күн бұрын
I think you may be mistaken about Sprey and the so called "Fighter Mafia". Have a look at Lazerpigs videos exposing him as a fraud...
@jjthompke5192
@jjthompke5192 2 күн бұрын
If the A-10 was the perfect ground support air craft, then why change it? Did tanks start to fly?
@SEOTeamBerlin
@SEOTeamBerlin Ай бұрын
the cannon with an aircraft built around it 🙃
@evryhndlestakn
@evryhndlestakn Ай бұрын
👍😁
@paulhills3853
@paulhills3853 Ай бұрын
😊ò 😊
@oldjarhead386
@oldjarhead386 3 күн бұрын
To this day the Air Force brass hasn’t learned its lesson about CAS and the A-10.
@kenmtb
@kenmtb 11 күн бұрын
Interesting helmet on the pilot at 6:42. Is this from WW2? I thought they all used the small leather ones.
@davidmorrill2943
@davidmorrill2943 4 күн бұрын
What is the most important job of a one purpose of any multipurpose plane ? Save the lives of American military personnel.
@ap6878
@ap6878 Ай бұрын
Its a master piece and a great air craft
@A_Man_Named_Mark
@A_Man_Named_Mark 10 күн бұрын
The A10 is the only thing us Army guys like about the airforce... so, of course, the USAF generals hate it.
@rustyogburn1085
@rustyogburn1085 26 күн бұрын
Give em to the Marines
@GH-oi2jf
@GH-oi2jf 16 күн бұрын
The Army should own the close air support mission.
@NovaScotiaNewfie
@NovaScotiaNewfie 13 күн бұрын
The Marines hsve their own aircraft for CAS.
@charlesarnold4059
@charlesarnold4059 10 күн бұрын
The marines were offered the A-10 in the 80s. It can't land on a STOL carrier or runway.
@jhendricks203
@jhendricks203 Ай бұрын
Our Air Force is more politics than brains.
@EderL.A
@EderL.A Ай бұрын
Goes to show you how much the government cares about its soldiers we need better Generals with big cojones
@knowahnosenothing4862
@knowahnosenothing4862 13 күн бұрын
If they make a new one it needs an Active Protection System like tanks have for MANPAD's.
@Nick-Stewbreeze
@Nick-Stewbreeze 7 күн бұрын
we were in contact from a tree line the, A10 removed the tree line and muzzle flashes
@wayneyd2
@wayneyd2 9 күн бұрын
We're doing the same thing today.
@treebrother
@treebrother 2 күн бұрын
Wow! Seems like even back then our best and brightest rarely ended up in positions of leadership. Sounds like to me that those in leadership that could see the bigger picture, Should have pushed a policy that any USAF Brass that tried to squash ground support would immediately be transferred and have to be assigned to and minimum of two years with front lines ground forces. See if they had a different perspective then. Maybe it shouldn't come as a shock that enlistment numbers are tanking. As usual the individuals that are on the ground in the shit are treated as the most expendable. Where the Brass rarely if ever have to worry about any repercussions for bad decisions and or faulty priorities. Such a bizarre issue that I've witnessed my entire working career in different trades. Rarely does leadership or management ever go to the guys and gals performing the job to get their input on ways of making things more productive and efficient.
@leslieandrews6324
@leslieandrews6324 7 күн бұрын
Fast movers are no good for close air support
@trevorphilips2090
@trevorphilips2090 8 күн бұрын
Came to learn about the A-.10, went away with how the air force ended up with the $2 trillion, glitch ridden and unproven F-35...
@steveo976
@steveo976 3 күн бұрын
As much as the U.S.airforce critics say the hog would be out of its element in Ukraine, I beg to differ , as I believe there are missions it would be very successful on, end of comment,👊
@richardknott2021
@richardknott2021 22 күн бұрын
Horton was being paid very well from military contractors..
@QuantumChance
@QuantumChance 8 күн бұрын
"Give me my A10s" He had some british soldiers to blue on blue I guess
@wesh2813
@wesh2813 6 күн бұрын
Blue on blue happens it sucks but that's war.. alot has been done to limit it but there will always be human error.. many of the BOBs were because of incorrect information/data given.. A couple of the Brits situations were mostly that..
@Kaze919
@Kaze919 Ай бұрын
Wtf. This is $200 on eBay? I got rid of my premium so I gotta check out the hacking scene first
@robertbandusky9565
@robertbandusky9565 Ай бұрын
As they say “follow the money”! ie bribery🇺🇸
@liquidrockaquatics3900
@liquidrockaquatics3900 2 күн бұрын
14:33 The military was perfectly prepared and capable of carrying out missions in Vietnam, but politicians got involved and literally hamstrung the entire military.
@NgaruawahiaDrones
@NgaruawahiaDrones Ай бұрын
If this is the thinking of the current generals then America will lose the next war to an army who communicates at ALL levels. All levels of Military are needed without any form of favoritism in any major battle that is Air, Ground and Sea in any order
@evryhndlestakn
@evryhndlestakn Ай бұрын
So true. Fellow Kiwi?🇳🇿
@white-dragon4424
@white-dragon4424 5 күн бұрын
I think I've found the US armed forces' main weakness, politics. You'd think they'd consider the lives of personnel far more than budgets and egos, but they don't.
@theccpisaparasite8813
@theccpisaparasite8813 7 күн бұрын
It was not designed for Vietnam....it was desighed for the North German plain
@trpugh9748
@trpugh9748 4 күн бұрын
Why don't they bring the plans out of mothballs and build the new version of the a-10 why is the American people throwing a fit about this the man on the ground need that new design a10
@jerrycanople4005
@jerrycanople4005 3 күн бұрын
There was no close air support in the 1800s lousy guys
@MrGottaQuestion
@MrGottaQuestion 2 күн бұрын
The A10 is not survivable. That's why the Air Force is getting rid of it. The proliferation of very capable IR-seeking manpads make it untennable. Very cool platform, but unnecessary. It can sure ground pound, but what's the point if it gets shot down? In more permissive environments, any other plane or helicopter can perform a similar roll. The cost-benefit simply isn't there. In Iraq it had 3 times the loss rate per mission of f16s. And that would have only gotten worse now with MANPADs being more common.
@MrGottaQuestion
@MrGottaQuestion 2 күн бұрын
I should point out that the A10 could be useful in a drone-carrying, or loitering munition / decoys on its many hardpoints, flying from unprepared and makeshift airfields. That could be useful in modern warfare. But maybe a purpose-built aircraft for this could be cheaper and more reliable.
@MrBootneck3027
@MrBootneck3027 5 күн бұрын
Horseshit mission?😂 spoken like a true air force officer
@icewaterslim7260
@icewaterslim7260 15 күн бұрын
What a great historical exposé of bureaucratic pettyness in the armed services! The infamous Mark 14 & 15 torpedo debacle early in WW2 ought to have been example enough not to put important ordinance into operation without thorough testing.
@mohammedcohen
@mohammedcohen 11 күн бұрын
...and the introduction of the M16 into combat in Vietnam...
@jerrycanople4005
@jerrycanople4005 3 күн бұрын
get your butts up there will ve a time where you must assault positions without support
@manricobianchini5276
@manricobianchini5276 8 күн бұрын
Love the P-47, but the F4u Corsair was the best fighter of WW2. Abd the Cheyenne was awesome, too. I believe it would've performed far better than the A-64. Freaking politics!
@straywolf77
@straywolf77 Ай бұрын
The vitriol against this aircraft started during its inception and continues to this day. It is amazing how the excuse is (was?) that it couldn't survive in the 'modern' battlefield. Well, please do tell WHAT aircraft can survive in the 'modern' battlefield. The A-10's purpose was to kill tanks. Long loiter times to help the ground pounders hold the line. F-16 could never do that and any damage sustained by the Vipers would be pretty much terminal. Anyways, we're headed into a 'modern' battle (war) here shortly and, unfortunately, these aircraft are on their way out. They will be missed...at the most inopportune time of their life...
@bryanpetersen1334
@bryanpetersen1334 14 күн бұрын
This is a rare view into the twisted world of our military branches and defense contracting. The security and defense of the USA and its interests always takes a back seat to the whims of childish, butthurt, and selfish brass.
@chorinzen
@chorinzen 22 күн бұрын
Absolutely fantastic article. 👍. The only disappointment is Mr Sprey. He gives the impression that half of the US military aircraft were partly designed by him. Or through his supposed insistence. I doubt that very much. He has no real combat experience and was never someone who worked with manufacturers, like Lockheed or Northrop. And ,if I can ask ,how effective is Robert MacNamara 's supposed doctrine in today's air battle space? I doubt it holds up that well. Just my 5 cents worth.
@charlesarnold4059
@charlesarnold4059 10 күн бұрын
Your 5 cents' worth isn't worth 5 cents.
@tamatirogerson6421
@tamatirogerson6421 6 сағат бұрын
That's David Attenborough narrating 😸
@daverobinson6110
@daverobinson6110 16 күн бұрын
Cold, hard, truth. I am sick of the violence and find myself having to justify this to everyone i say it to. That's stopping right now! And i know all of the sad history of the region. And it mirrors the sad future of the region. Im done with it all. Its never going to change until we have all had enough of it. And they dont want change all they want is more blood...
@robertmiller2173
@robertmiller2173 Ай бұрын
Hans Von Ohain invented the Jet Engine. He had a Jet Aircraft Flying Before WW2!
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Ай бұрын
1. Hans Von Ohain credited Whittle as the inventor in his own book, so you would have to disagree with the man himself, which would be really odd. 2. The first working turbojet was Whittle’s, in April 1937 3. Hans Von Ohain, by his own admission, had access to Whittle’s work. The British inventor’s work had not been secreted by the British government (a shame), and Germany copied it, distributing it across German Universities. When Von Ohain and his assistant started working on a turbojet they had full access to his work 4. The first flight you are referring to, the He 178 had a centrifugal turbojet (Whittle), and not an axial turbojet, which was the aim of Von Ohain. What you are missing here is that Whittle was already aware of an axial solution 6 years before Von Ohain started working on the turbojet, but discarded it precisely for the reasons that made Germany fail at having a properly operational turbojet even by the end of the war. Effectively Germany deployed their turbojet at the end of 1944, but it was still utterly flawed, fragile, hard to operate, over engineered, and desperately short lived. This despite three different German companies working on it for many, many years (Junkers, BMW, Heinkel). After the war ended barely anyone cared about those flawed engines. The Soviets quickly trashed multiple variants, and opted to copy Whittle’s turbojet, and the French assembled a platoon of Nazi engineers (120 I believe), and worked on them for years, made radical modifications, and had to seek the help of an American company to make them proper engines. Whittle understood (in 1929) that an interim solution was needed, hence his invention that bypassed axial compressors. Had the government not ignored him for far too many years, Britain would have had a reliable turbojet well before the beginning of the war. Unfortunately the person responsible for this massive delay was Griffith, the sole judge of Whittle’s work, and he happened to be the author of a seminal paper on axial compressors in 1926 (when Von Ohain was a teenager). It is quite obvious why Griffith dismissed and ridiculed young Whittle’s work, an obviously blatant conflict of interest. Whittle carried on, unsupported and without money until 1935 (6 years wasted), when he got a lucky break in mid 1935, in the form of a minimal private funding (£200,000 in today’s money!). At the same time, in Germany, Von Ohain had all the resources he needed, and most importantly was working with an aircraft manufacturer, something Whittle could only dream of. That is the only reason why they had the first flight (with Whittle’s invention powering it). Call it David vs. Goliath, but obviously the British genius got there first. The invention of the turbojet has nothing to do with the first flight, and I might add that deployment of the Me 262 with useless engines was merely an act of desperation that did not make a dent in the tides of war. Britain had been working on both axial and centrifugal turbojets for a long time, but they were not stupid enough to deploy them. Had they supported Whittle in 1929, the could have certainly have had proper centrifugal turbojet, but that was not to be, and we have to thank Griffith for that, as Whittle never blamed the military, but certainly questioned Griffith’s poor judgment. Proper axial turbojets became a thing in the mid 50s, but they had nothing to do with flawed German creations, rather proper research that started in the 30s, mostly in Britain. I might add that Whittle also understood the benefits of altitude and pressurization for jet propelled aircraft in his thesis,,something that Von Ohain was completely oblivious to, setting them even further apart as inventors, and visionaries.
@deuteronimus750
@deuteronimus750 Ай бұрын
Ukraine said thanks but no thanks when offered the A10.
@dirtdevil70
@dirtdevil70 Ай бұрын
A10's would get eaten alive in Ukraine because Ukraine does not even have local air superiority over the battlefield. In GW I, the coalition forces owned the skies so the A-10s could operate with impunity.
@evryhndlestakn
@evryhndlestakn Ай бұрын
That's.....pretty dumb.
@TraderDan58
@TraderDan58 27 күн бұрын
The A-10 is the wrong aircraft for this war due to several reasons. @dirtdevil70 mentioned one of them. Also important is that Ukraine has no pilots for them who are trained for close air support. The A-10 is a phenomenal aircraft but the pilots are pretty damn important too. Another reason they turned them down is because much of this war takes place in urban areas. That’s not the best use of an A-10
@AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc
@AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc 25 күн бұрын
Must have air superiority.
@sfelton8943
@sfelton8943 24 күн бұрын
The lessons in Ukraine could even be an (unexpected) justification not to focus on aircraft like the a10. As much as I love the platform it seems like you just can't fly a slow jet over a battlefield without serious risk of shoot down these days. Russia has air superiority and still don't seem to field many aircraft
@allenwilliams4371
@allenwilliams4371 13 күн бұрын
Has their ever not been war in the Middle East?
@georgejennings3599
@georgejennings3599 Күн бұрын
Way to many stupid ads
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Күн бұрын
Perhaps you are not aware that there are many ways to avoid ads, including having KZfaq Premium, which comes with that perk among the many other
@kaing5074
@kaing5074 Ай бұрын
More friendly fire incidents than any other aircraft. Most overpriced and outdated platform. Costs more than an F16. No more A10 propaganda....
@evryhndlestakn
@evryhndlestakn Ай бұрын
Wrong. Why do you think it's involved in the most friendly fire incidents? If you don't just look at a number but consider the reason. Why do you think that might be? I'll give you a hint. Why do labradors figure high in most dog bite stats? Because they are aggressive dogs maybe? No. Because they are popular & around families more than virtually all other dogs & are known as quite tolerant but they still sometimes bite. The A-10 is a CLOSE SUPPORT aircraft & therefore fighting in close. CLOSE. Do you think a plane firing or bombing 500 feet higher or twice as fast would be more accurate somehow? I wonder who could really decide this though? Oh yes, the soldiers on the ground who say there is no sweeter sound when you need immediate help than an A-10 coming in. But you know. That's why it's been in the inventory for such a short time. Yup.
@evryhndlestakn
@evryhndlestakn Ай бұрын
Not only did you watch the A-10 propaganda but went to the trouble of commenting. Did you factor in survivability? Because you can throw up some numbers but what relevance are they? An F-16 is cheaper you say. In what way? Let me guess, money right? But they dont have the armour that the plane designed for the role has. So what if on the same amount of missions they lost twice as many F-16's because they aren't quite as rugged? That would be more expensive in money terms wouldn't it? I think so. And what if on those missions they lose a pilot everytime their plane gets hit because it doesn't have a titanium bathtub for the pilot in a ground attack role? Well that gets expensive financially as well doesn't it. Now you have to start with a green pilot & train them up & all of that cost, all the experience lost. Of course there's the human factor though. It's not always about money is it? So why would you send in pilots without adequate protection? You titanium the F-16 then that's more cost, more strain on the airframe, engines. So what do you do? You send A-10's ya noodle. An aging plane always has additional running costs & as much of a fan of the F-16 as I am, the Warthog has obviously proven its ability & role suitability. I think that politicians & others have no problem eliminating aircraft out of the inventory if they can. They have had other options yet nothing does it better than the A-10. Friendly fire is the worst but if you're expecting no injuries or deaths then you're actually talking about a video game.
@ianmurdoch26
@ianmurdoch26 Ай бұрын
Is this a new copypasta?
@richardclary6267
@richardclary6267 12 күн бұрын
THIS IS A RUSSIAN,CHINESE OR IRANIAN AGENTS COMMENT
@Dov_ben-Maccabee
@Dov_ben-Maccabee 11 күн бұрын
Obvious a Taliban troll
Normal vs Smokers !! 😱😱😱
00:12
Tibo InShape
Рет қаралды 114 МЛН
Did you find it?! 🤔✨✍️ #funnyart
00:11
Artistomg
Рет қаралды 119 МЛН
КАХА и Джин 2
00:36
К-Media
Рет қаралды 3,8 МЛН
Aviation Wonders, Lesser Known Aircraft And Engineering Marvels
41:31
Трагичная История Девушки 😱🔥
0:58
Смотри Под Чаёк
Рет қаралды 370 М.
📱 SAMSUNG, ЧТО С ЛИЦОМ? 🤡
0:46
Яблочный Маньяк
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
Nokia 3310 versus Red Hot Ball
0:37
PressTube
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
Дени против умной колонки😁
0:40
Deni & Mani
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН