There’s nothing dutiful about William. He’s more of a rebel than Harry, the crown just tries harder to hide it

That may be the case but Margaret never deserted her sister!

@@nicolaallen7698 she has never been happy either

@@richirahman1840 she was born into privilege and with that privilege comes responsibilities and obligations.

​@@jaimesantos1170 but been born into a privileged life doesn't mean they must be miserable and unhappy their whole lives.

I’m the oldest of three and this is exactly how I feel.

Well put~

This how my relationship to my father and mother is

Not really older one are the abuser one

@@mitraavesta7548 unfair statement to make. Often the eldest are the most protective over their younger sibling(s), and will always have their back. I know many people who are the eldest, as well as being one myself, and I can tell you that they and myself would never dream of abusing our siblings, no matter how much we may hate them sometimes.

@@cora_hm And yet his actions since stepping down as a senior royal, suggest anything but. It's like he and Meghan are desperate for attention.

@Raindrop 28Harry and Meghan never wanted Archie to have a title. Anyway, when Charles becomes King, Archie will automatically become a Prince. Educated yourself .

@@MauriceRivers415 Harry and Meghan are working, you twit. I know you are not use to Royal's who actually work. Can you imagine Kate trying to broker a $100M+ deal? 😂🤣😅

@@MauriceRivers415 desperate for attention? maybe he wants to step out of that kind of life and scape as his mother did

@@MauriceRivers415 bruh you are dead wrong

That was beautiful! 👏🏼❤

Well, I think the really sour note was when Margaret wasn't allowed to marry the love of her life. She should have just been allowed and then Margaret could have made her mistake and lived with them.

I am skeptical of Imelda and Lesley all though I like Lesley

I like Helena and Olivia as actresses but I really didn't like them as Margaret and Elizabeth

@@seren4740 and why is that? I get the emotion from them, the portrayal were good, the acting were also marvelous. I mean I get it that it's your opinion, but if the reason you dont like them as lilibeth and margot bcs of their appearance dont really match the real life person then it is kinda silly imo

Oh cuz I forgot they casted a new Margret as she’s older

Yeah this is actually annoying, I mean Margaret matters too, She's one of the royal family💔Her history matters, Her life matters, Her death matters because we all cried for it. And I'm so mad that they will cover her death. This is unfair for her. The world should know about her.

@@nadaadel5117 Yeah but they're probably not going to cover her death until season 6. But it will be tricky considering that if the series ends with William's wedding or at least that's what speculated, then her death would probably be at the beginning of the Season which seems somewhat anti-climactic for her character. I guess we'll see what happens

@@satyendrandonibanerjee8682 Yeah I guess that too

I think it will end in 2002, the queens golden jubilee and the year both the queen mother and Margaret died

Exactly as it always goes, even right now harry is known as the fun and cheeky brother but William is boring and always too busy

This comment should be much higher. Elizabeth was the solid one, at the end of the day this is what the job requires.

True. But it's a shame no one sees her side.

That’s what happens in real life .. look at queen and princess

Maybe you're right but both of them played Margaret beautifully, especially they looked like the real princess Margaret in her pictures, So no matter what their eye colors looked like. Who cares about that if they're actually really talented?!

It's always best to get the actress who can play the role right, over than an actress who just looks like the person they are playing

Isabel = s1/s2 Claire Foy, s3/s4 Olivia Colman Margarita = s1/s2 Vanessa Kirby, s3/s4 Helena Bonham Carter

The crown

The Crown

I think that all her strength wear on to still be something and not just a little sister. I also believe that I’m the long run she would be a better queen then Elizabeth because she still had one foot in the real world and in my opinion had a better understanding of the fact that they needed to change the monarchy, and I also believe that she would have grown with the task and that Peter would have been more comfortable with been number 2 I the family if you compare him with Filip. No one can know for sure but she was a born leader and we’re more comfortable with being with the actual people so on that front she definitely out shine her older sister who doesn’t like to even do live speeches.

@@carolinasandberg4567 Elizabeth was called her fathers pride for a reason, she has solid foundations and that’s what it takes to be great, Margret is too fleeting,too impulsive and vain these traits a great leader can not have so there for number 2

@@mobrown7594 You summed it up perfectly. Many of the things Elizabeth hated about herself were the things that have made her a great queen. To lead, you have to be able to put personal feelings aside and do the job you’re called to do. You have to be able to think with your head and not your heart so much. Margaret was definitely impulsive, had an addictive personality, and would’ve let love get in the way like Edward.

@@carolinasandberg4567 What about her guttersnipe life..

​@@carolinasandberg4567I've seen a lot of people saying that Margaret would be an incredible queen. However, the monarchy could weaken with some of its ideas and actions. Furthermore, the monarch cannot do whatever he wants. He has his obligations and duties and must defend and fulfill them with the utmost respect. Margaret was very loose and down to earth. Perhaps her life would be even more difficult if she were queen, as she could probably be stopped by the government or even her own family because of her behavior. If Queen Elizabeth II, who was taught from the age of 10 and didn't have as much freedom or had some obstacles during her reign, imagine for Margaret that she didn't have so many people on top of her telling her what she should or shouldn't do, or her studies What did Elizabeth have on the constitution? Don't you think it would be much more difficult for a person who wasn't prepared correctly for this position? The country was going through difficult situations and the queen needed to be strong and mature. Would Margaret be able to handle it, from what I've read about her, Margaret was a person who wanted to live a happy and free life. Do you think she could have those parties she did? No. Being queen/king is much more than serving your country, it is obeying the laws and traditions that the monarchy carries. Would she be willing to let go of her dreams, the man she loved. Because if you think she would marry Peter if she were queen, you're wrong. If as a princess she couldn't, who will say as a queen?

The weight of crown is quite heavy for the one who wears it. Being the eldest and the Queen one must know how to be dutiful and set an example. Queen Elizabeth married her sister to someone else just to stabilise the politics and not to disturb the equality of power.

Well, they both suffered because they had different desires and dreams. The situation was complicated for both of them. Imagine living in the shadow of the sister you would like to live her life as? And imagine the queen having to make decisions that would hurt her sister, even though she didn't want to hurt her, but she had to make that decision because she was queen and because she swore an oath to her people?