Els Exèrcits del segle XVIII. Batalla de Poltava (1709)
Пікірлер: 101
@Dominic.Dybala8 ай бұрын
What a horribly shot/directed 1700s battle! They got good costumes and sound, but appalling tactics. Scenes like this give the myth that they "just stood there taking turns shooting at each other." Both regiments should have been loading as fast as they could have to get off more shots. And why did they both charge at the same time? Why not just keep shooting? Charges were for very particular uses. Also, terribly cliché how once the melee began they just meshed together. In reality, by basic psychology, the two units would have mostly stuck together and there would have been a more clear line between them - think of it, you want to stay close to your friends and not surround yourself with your enemies. Further, the use of the cavalry is completely unclear the way the battle is filmed. And finally, how the heck did the cavalry just cut through what should have been a perfect square?? On the whole, it looks "pretty," but is entirely disappointing to those who know what it should be like, and lamentably misleading for those who do not.
@pavel84858 ай бұрын
Field Marshall Suvorov once said "shoot rare but precise" and "A bullet is fool, the bayonet is a good fellow". He hardly trained his soldiers to march fast and to not be afraid of close melee combat. He invented the column tactic. The man commanded in 60 battles against turks, poles and french and did not lose a single one, although in many he was outnumbered. The thing was that when you believe in your comrades and you do not fear melee combat you run that 20-40 metres in few seconds and run over your enemy making him panic and run away. That's the basic psychology too:) I know that british preferred to train shooting. But be honest - British were focused on fleet, not army. Meanwhile, on the continent, the melee rushes of a well trained regular army showed to be more effective than fire linear tactics. The best examples - Suvorov, and after him - Napoleon
@VPoster586 ай бұрын
You are wrong... Forming a square is valid only against cavalry... But in this battle the cavalry attacked together with the infantry. Prince Menshikov bypassed Charles's army from the right flank. And when he saw that the Russian and Swedish infantry were engaged in hand-to-hand combat, he struck along the line right into the center of the Swedish army... And she ran... This is not a movie, it happened in reality.
@user-hv9fx7eg9k5 ай бұрын
Зайди в Википедию и хоть чуть узнай об этом сражении. У шведом меньшая численность войск, поэтому менее глубокое построение и кавалерия преодолевала её легче. Шведская армия делала упор на быструю штыковую атаку.Карл просто зазнался после многих побед.
@ideagame36334 ай бұрын
LOOK American Patriot Film" With Gibson.
@1959MuratАй бұрын
Usual Swedish tactics. Volley shooting and then bayonet attack.
@user-yo8zc1cn7o7 күн бұрын
И в правду как театр. Все такие нарядные и привлекательные.
@pirrildio446510 ай бұрын
What is the name of the march of the beginning?
@TheGamadril10 ай бұрын
something from ABBA
@ex3719 ай бұрын
@@TheGamadril 😂
@angelord87992 жыл бұрын
Epic
@barogbarog8 ай бұрын
ИКЕА vs Пятерочка
@dmitriyrozhdestvenskiy28267 ай бұрын
Да уж, IKEA что-то сдулась😂
@user-pu4wf5xc1i8 ай бұрын
ماهو اسم الفلم
@dmitriyrozhdestvenskiy28267 ай бұрын
The Sovereign's Servant. A Russian one.
@user-yj9rs8hl5q3 ай бұрын
Для не понимающих это 18 век а лучники воевали в 16 веке и раньше при рыцарях и то узнайте где они жили и стреляли из лука ❤❤
@sebastiannyberg915111 күн бұрын
Lol that people dont understand that is just funny
@user-sy7vy5it8p8 ай бұрын
Great Russia was, is and will be.
@sebastiannyberg915111 күн бұрын
Narva?
@Doc_Holiday217824 күн бұрын
Sit and eat popcorn in battle of poltava
@altermostschadel32678 ай бұрын
Whats the Name of this movie? Which hidtorical armys fight there?
@user-hw6fb4nl5p8 ай бұрын
Россия - Швеция 1:0
@johangrostkerck60468 ай бұрын
I believe this is Демидовы (1983).
@TheFreshEC8 ай бұрын
It's a portrayal of the Battle of Poltava in 1709, it was the turning point of the Greath Northern War (1700-1721) mainly fought between the Swedish Empire and the Tsardom of Russia. It marked the end of the Swedish Empire as a European great power and the beginning of the Russian Empire as a European great power.
@josecarlossanchez25808 ай бұрын
The Sovereign's Servant
@yf32834 ай бұрын
Marsch des Leib-Garde-Preobraschenski Regiments kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bayJZLGHltamfGQ.html
@user-cq4st9hh7k9 ай бұрын
Флёров в роли Карла это кабздец
@viktorvolin568 ай бұрын
уверен, ты смотрелся бы лучше
@user-cq4st9hh7k8 ай бұрын
@@viktorvolin56 похую в чем ты там уверен
@jerryumfress90308 ай бұрын
I understand the reasoning behind mass formations. Volley fire with muskets. All the way up until the first world War. Probably the most stupid form of battle
@bmo50828 ай бұрын
I agree, definitely a hold over from earlier technology.
@Seraphim79968 ай бұрын
Not that stupid, it made a lot of sense in context.
@alth0008 ай бұрын
As I understand such cases of face-to-face volleys were not necessarily common. Probably formations were moving relatively sideways, terrain and gunsmoke hid formations from each other
@yidy18 ай бұрын
Ducks in a barrel.
@XxanyvidsxX5 ай бұрын
People always shit on line infantry warfare, but don’t realize the reason they did that (maybe not as exaggerated) was because the musket was inaccurate and all shooting at once guaranteed a couple kills. If they stood far apart and shot there would be friendly fire all the time and people would shoot and then leave themselves exposed to Calvary. This was the way war was fought until semi-automatic weapons came along. Even artillery didn’t stop them from doing this cause it just worked
@user-yj9rs8hl5q3 ай бұрын
Плохая тактика боя была бессмысленно погибали и наши и противники
@user-lr6cu8py4x2 ай бұрын
Тупо стоит плечом к плечу чтобы не пропустить пули...
@Dennizjoon14 жыл бұрын
synd att sverige inte vann men armen var ganska sliten vid den tiden alla ryttare var långt bort och många kanoner hade ej hängt med =(
@luchshiy_v_ADU Жыл бұрын
Не дождёшься.
@Dennizjoon Жыл бұрын
@@luchshiy_v_ADU Responding to a 12 year old comment, didn't expect that haha
@user-rk2uf5xx4d Жыл бұрын
@@Dennizjoon ЛОЛ
@user-vz8dx3ip7h Жыл бұрын
заднеприводные проиграли.
@lunatiqjr9007 Жыл бұрын
@@Dennizjoon loll
@joackczp71508 ай бұрын
medieval
@user-or8nq8ho9e8 ай бұрын
meat grinder
@eraycakrlar238011 ай бұрын
bu avrupalılar cidden savaşmayı bilmiyor :)
@Mr_breakingbad11 ай бұрын
Like your country knows😂
@eraycakrlar238011 ай бұрын
@@Mr_breakingbad Turks are coming ,you know these words right ,I didn't make it up, your ancestors said it 😅👌
@amaral284410 ай бұрын
@@eraycakrlar2380 Say that to the Germans who stood up to the whole world.
@pushistiykot530510 ай бұрын
@@amaral2844 немцы очень тупые
@MadMax-xi2tg9 ай бұрын
@@eraycakrlar2380 русские били турков на протяжении всей мировой истории
@el_dios54377 ай бұрын
pelean rusos y prusianos verdad?
@ElCausa-gt5hl7 ай бұрын
Suecos
@FredyVega1177 ай бұрын
Imperio ruso vs imperio sueco
@user-ok9dc5qt8d3 ай бұрын
@@FredyVega117 La Gran Guerra Del Norte 1700-1721
@user-rv8wj2uh7o9 ай бұрын
Показуха.
@jordanfoppoli37098 ай бұрын
Estas formas de batalla realmente eran estúpidas no tenian estrategias
@FredyVega1177 ай бұрын
Ignorancia, aprende estrategia, está es una mala representación
@user-jv9ho8bj8y8 ай бұрын
Линейная атака самое тупое что могли придумать
@BadBoy-bt6lb8 ай бұрын
Другой стратегии тогда для нас любителей Вар Кравт и тд тогда не придумали😅
@BadBoy-bt6lb8 ай бұрын
Страшные войны были и кровавые.
@user-wc1je7gr6k8 ай бұрын
Ти просто незнаєш що таке честь🤨
@user-pf4kl6nd6w8 ай бұрын
Сиди на кухне и ковыряй в носу, умник, развелось балбесов!
@user-hw6fb4nl5p8 ай бұрын
При "косоглазости" оружия того времени это была самая умная тактика!!!! Массовость залпа компенсировала его кривость.... А перезаряжать на бегу такое оружие было довольно проблематично..... Поэтому и вставали друг против друга и палили.... Ну на худой конец после залпа чутка передвигались вперед, до следующего залпа....
@raymondrocco86078 ай бұрын
Most Stupid form of Battle ! Julius Caesar would be scratching his head in disbelief if he saw this type of Warfare !
@johnadams-wp2yb8 ай бұрын
These kind of tactics are useless. One side should have empoyed archers. The Romans would have killed both sides at once.
@user-jt1wz6gd5s8 ай бұрын
In next ones deeds without fail.😊
@Seraphim79968 ай бұрын
They only seem useless to people who don't actually know what they are talking about. In reality there were many good reasons why they fought this way.
@johnadams-wp2yb8 ай бұрын
Oh yeah? Like what for instance? There are no 'tactics' at all. Amateurs.@@Seraphim7996
@Jonesjon.8 ай бұрын
@@Seraphim7996can you explain the reasons please?
@MK_ULTRA4208 ай бұрын
@@Jonesjon. To put it simply, bullets are deadlier than arrows.
@cryptomo661010 ай бұрын
Боже храни Россию🇷🇺✊
@jeremygonzales78206 ай бұрын
Dios maldiga a Rusia y bendiga a ucrania
@user-ou5yk4tk5l5 ай бұрын
@@jeremygonzales7820, Украина давно проклята, это Иудины дети