Great foul call. Official was in perfect position, and made a courageous--but absolutely correct--call.
@1Outis1 Жыл бұрын
I don't know, it looks like the picker push the defensive player into the shooter, but that was just from the two angles we saw.
@traysargent49337 ай бұрын
Missed the illegal screen on miss st
@JoeBobTheTROLL4 жыл бұрын
Hmm makes you wonder. What if an away team was in this situation and had someone purposely throw something on the floor so they could get extra free throws or the ball back lol
@jansenbreitenstein67024 жыл бұрын
Joe Bob woah😳
@johnstarnes19253 жыл бұрын
My question exactly
@tntkop2 жыл бұрын
Only an idiot would throw something onto the court.
@dangerfindertreasureseeker89052 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing. Who threw it ?
@DarkTempler12 жыл бұрын
yoooo for real!!!!!!!!!!!!! that would be cheating
@Joekuh5 жыл бұрын
Looks like they got it right. Good job fellas.
@lukegardner44543 жыл бұрын
This time; and for the Georgia fan, you can't throw your stuff bulldog on the court.
@codycooper22613 жыл бұрын
Fans should never be given techs. They are NOT part of the game!
@SarahDigsHockey3 жыл бұрын
The fans didn't get the tech, the home team did.
@ericmoncier82533 жыл бұрын
Looks right to me!!! Hope you all are doing well and staying safe!!!
@MrEHunter25 жыл бұрын
Only thing that was never confirmed before the tech...Who threw the object. It’s assumed it was the home team. This could now be an issue of visiting fans trying to get a “technical” on home teams if games are close - in my opinion. BTW - the end of game foul was a good call by the ref. Great positioning and coverage.
@andrew40293 жыл бұрын
Doesn't matter according to current rules. Rightly or wrongly, the technical will be called on the home team.
@philhaddad54952 жыл бұрын
I agree good call on foul and I agree with the assesment of techincal foul
@billwalters43382 жыл бұрын
Had an imbecile ref do that to us, said he heard a curse word from behind our bench at a 150 team tournament where ANYONE could be watching even if they weren't a fan of that team. Thought to myself the same thing I can go sit behind the visitor team and swear loudly. I used to ref football, had the referee overturn one of my calls "an interception" by a team winning by a big score, said he wanted to give the losing team another chance. After the game I chased him to his truck like a coward he jumped in and took off before i could put my hands on him.
@vitesse_arnhem Жыл бұрын
@@billwalters4338 As justified as you may have been, sheriff’s deputies would not have agreed with you. Better to send the game tape to the assignor and end the ref’s career.
@billwalters4338 Жыл бұрын
@@vitesse_arnhem Did that
@RigneyOutdoors5 жыл бұрын
Correct all the way around. Unfortunate situation though
@jerrymonroe75113 жыл бұрын
tom Crean with the intercom 💀💀💀
@StellarWishGaming20024 жыл бұрын
If the fan didn't throw something on the court the game would have gone to overtime due to Miss St missing the other 2 free throws. Don't throw things onto the court people, it could cost your team the game..
@SarahDigsHockey3 жыл бұрын
He missed the final free throw shot on purpose. If you take away the tech foul shot, he would not have tried to miss the second shot on purpose after missing the first.
@philliprunge Жыл бұрын
Did you watch the video at all? Wow. Just wow.
@marclau69742 жыл бұрын
I couldn't hear what the Georgia coach said on the PA mic. Does anyone know?
@sifu70525 жыл бұрын
Correct call! Otherwise, fans will do it again on the next game.
@philhaddad54952 жыл бұрын
I agree with the foul call definetly a block. the techincal ehhhhhhhhh how do you know who throw it. you're assuming it was the home team. Also it really didn;t affect the play at all.
@jimmeyjohn3 жыл бұрын
I need to get some new glasses, it looked like the defender hit the ball.
@sweetyd3 жыл бұрын
Yes, he did. However, he hits his body with his hip while airborne and shooting. This is a foul.
@KeithMarkMRA2 жыл бұрын
You don’t live in Cleveland you live in Cincinnati
@highntight8454 ай бұрын
So basically i should go to an awsy game, throw stuff. Eject and ban fan...no technical warranted, has nothing to do with players/coaches
@tylerhopkins53733 жыл бұрын
help me understand why he only gets 1 technical foul shot?
@MrGeneric20112 жыл бұрын
That is the penalty assessed for that type of infraction, per the rules.
@g-palloyd36003 жыл бұрын
Could have been opposing team fan, but 1) came from home team section....those folks would have been pointing culprit out. (Their silence says volumes. 2) doubt appoint team would have “planted” someone thinking this situation would arise, and 3) it has been my experience that college kids would be bright enough to think of it! LOL! 😂.......looks like the only call that could be made!
@FedUpKentuckian2 жыл бұрын
This was stupid...punishing a team for something a "fan" did....very dumb
@milart12 Жыл бұрын
Agreed. And it didn't affect the shot at all.
@fighterfloyd222 жыл бұрын
Shooting foul: 100% correct. A fan throwing something onto the floor, I honestly don’t even know. I want to have more of an argument about what the refs did and did not do right, but I don’t even know where to begin with that.
@jbevill40853 жыл бұрын
The shooting foul yes, the fan throwing object no because it was after the shot, didn’t hit anyone and didn’t affect the missed shot. No harm no foul. The fan should’ve been found, and banned from attending games again.
@ryanweifze32373 жыл бұрын
How can you know it was a Georgia fan that threw the stuff animal
@mikemann9359 ай бұрын
If it was a technical foul, why were the lanes filled for second shot? Also, why was he not awarded the second of his two shot foul? Is college different in that area than high school? (Just wondering)
@OfficiatingBornVideos9 ай бұрын
Pretty much all technical fouls at the NCAA level are enforced at the "point of interruption." That means that you shoot the free throws for the technical foul and then you go back to the place you were at the time of the technical foul. And that is both Class A and Class B technical fouls in almost every case. The only time we clear the lane in the NCAA is a Dead Ball Contact Technical where you give the ball to the team that was contacted. Otherwise, this is like every other technical foul at the NCAA level.
@Stryyder13 жыл бұрын
Happened well after the shot was off did see it until after he missed... No way to tell who threw it. Bad call...
@SarahDigsHockey3 жыл бұрын
I agree. I think it was an overreaction by the refs. The commentator said that the tech foul was called to send a message to the fans to stop throwing things onto the court. The refs could have sent the the message by making an announcement that if it happened again, it would be a tech foul. If it happens a second time, then call the tech foul. The first shot was missed before the object landed on the court.
@gyrowave5 жыл бұрын
Tough gig. . .the rule goes against the house? Hardly a visitor fan in that situation would do that! I don't like both benches trying to heat up a tense situation!
@edmckimmy61593 жыл бұрын
there is by rule the phrase of having direct knowledge on something I hope that official and the crew had direct knowledge as to which team that fan was for.. to properly penalize!
@MrGeneric20112 жыл бұрын
Refs had direct knowledge of a fan throwing an object onto the court. Which team the fan may have been rooting for is irrelevant. The technical for fan interference is assessed on the home team.
@SgvSth5 жыл бұрын
First call was right, but I feel like the second call was wrong. I can understand voiding the initial shot even though the item hit the floor after the shot was attempted, but it feels like the game was decided not by the players. I will say that the video lacks context if a warning was already issued, but I assume not since it would likely have been included then.
@paulsonj725 жыл бұрын
Under the NCAA-M rule set it is pretty much an automatic call in that situation to call the T. So the officials had no choice but to call the T despite the time remaining on the clock
@SgvSth5 жыл бұрын
I guess I misunderstood the rule then. I do wish that things could have been decided just by on court actions.
@Minecraftmaster444 жыл бұрын
@@SgvSth disagree. Rules like these prevent fans from tossing stuff onto the floor and getting penalized for it. Without these rules these actions would happen more often.
@jasonspalding12534 жыл бұрын
@@Minecraftmaster44 Knowing these rules however for fans if your team is down and or its tied he missed his first free throw what would it stop a die hard fan from throwing something on the floor to give his team another chance....In that fact not much one can do unless point out the person who did it. Shouldn't be a T call on the home team.
@andrew40293 жыл бұрын
@@jasonspalding1253: Doesn't matter who throws it according to current rules. Rightly or wrongly, the technical will be called on the home team.
@DarkTempler12 жыл бұрын
intentional misses like that arent allowed I thought
@Gambilldadjokes4 ай бұрын
Did they catch the idiot that threw it and ban them for the rest of the season?
@1Outis1 Жыл бұрын
I think it's pretty funny that throwing a stuffed animal got a technical foul, but it's not the best one I've ever seen. That honor goes to a school band playing three blind mice.
@davidharris80823 жыл бұрын
U have to know who threw it ,if you don't you can't call a technical for it. Only option is to clear the gym if more objects come out!
@dallasmckee30263 жыл бұрын
Another situation were referee think fans are there to see them the foul was tixtic and technical was for something thar was throw after the ball left the player hands come on that should have been a warning
@thetrainwxgeek3 жыл бұрын
Good call on the foul as he got the player down low. Also, in the rules it’s an automatic T if a fan throws something on the court during a free throw
@jasonhall51493 жыл бұрын
That came from behind the visitors bench
@kristopherloviska90422 жыл бұрын
Are you high?
@patrickwilson38353 жыл бұрын
This is such a stupid foul! Like there is zero chance you are 100% sure which fan that is! There are fans for both teams at games this big! Like you legit cannot have a rule that impacts the actual game when you have no clue who to assess it to
@BillyM820943 жыл бұрын
the object throwing by the fan definitely cost Georgia the game
@2themoon8632 жыл бұрын
I missed something here: The shooter hits the free throw despite the object coming on the court; a “T” is called, then that free throw is shot, THEN the other free throw for the original foul is shot? I thought that you first shoot the free throws for the foul, THEN you shoot any technical free throws?
@kristopherloviska90422 жыл бұрын
The reason the technical free throw attempt came next is because if the 2nd FT attempt is missed it is a live ball.
@joyesnarcisse4031 Жыл бұрын
The black announcer is absolutely clueless on what is happening.
@johnruth41963 жыл бұрын
There were as there always are numerous technical fouls that weren't called. Rule book is clear. Any attempt to "influence the officials decision" is a technical foul.
@dannyallen98043 жыл бұрын
So wait if my team is missing a free throw I can throw something on the court and get the team I'm for another chance at making the basket 🤔
@hispsychicemanationsflowed Жыл бұрын
That was the right call. UGA fans are just trashy.
@partybusexperiance32893 жыл бұрын
Just because Georgia is home does not mean there are no Miss fans there. This is a stupid rule. I would go to every away game and in that situation I would throw my Barney doll on the court and het my guy and extra free throw. Then at the end of the season, I would confess and get them to change the rule or my friend will do it next year.
@kdatbat80373 жыл бұрын
.5 left at the line. Shot gone, no interference, warning to crowd was enough
@jansenbreitenstein67024 жыл бұрын
This is so stupid, I’m no Georgia fan but they cannot control if a fan throws something on the court technicals and flagrants should only be given to a team if they did something that they can control
@johnguedel71194 жыл бұрын
And who is to say a Mississippi St Han didn’t do it?
@asherriley48823 жыл бұрын
@@johnguedel7119 That was my point in my reply to @gelarjor - In all likelihood, you do not...so given that, who gets a tech and why? Not safe to assume it was a jilted fan. Probably was...but not a certainty. Impossible to say whether he would have made that second free throw had the tech not happened...game easily could have gone to OT. Still either team's game.
@KubiqFeet3 жыл бұрын
I guess I would sort of understand the frustration if the foul was a close-ish call but that was a very blatant foul.. He hadn't even released the ball yet and he was run into by the defender, you can't sweep someone's legs like that and not have it be a foul. It was a stupid decision by Georgia to do that, just feels like inexperience.
@LostLakeTribune3 жыл бұрын
Keep in mind, NFHS rules are different in this situation.