DEFINED: ENERGY, EMISSION, MEDIUM, GROUND, & PARTICLES drive.google.com/file/d/1nGUUs_6o7Vs2yoHMYurLirfmK0q86bPf/view

Mr. Ken, you are such a kind soul. To me, truth is the greatest gift one can give or receive and I thank you from the bottom of my heart for it. I'm an autistic savant and there are very few people around me who notice or experience reality in the same way I do. It makes me so happy because many times it feels like you're sorting through the thoughts swirling around in my head and explaining them to me, I hope that makes sense? You've enabled me to explain part of my world to a few others close to me which to me is an enormous gift. You've helped enable me to pass truth/knowledge/wisdom to others as well. I just think life is far too precious to waste an opportunity like this to let a person know you appreciate them. Again, sincere thanks Mr. Ken, from the bottom of my heart. Lux et veritas et sapientia, caritas et admiratio et sapientia.

Ken. Have you seen any studies by Victor Schauberger (1885 1958)on water. He even created water friendly piping. He felt that water being pumped under excessive pressures and forced through many 90% elbows made water toxic. He also showed that water flowing and forced to make a 90%deflection off a wall creates a current. I didn't know that about water. He also talks about how water resets or gains structure when subjected to a vortex. He also said that science discoveries are based on explosion,when it should be looking more towards implotion experiments.

Another excellent video. Easily understood. The more I listen to you the more I understand. Understanding the terminology is key to these videos.

Hi Ken. I love listening to you talk. 99% of it goes over my head, but that doesn't stop me from coming back. I get excited when I think I see paralls in topics seemingly unrelated. Or read about a guy like Victor Shouberger on water. I remember weird facts that sometimes come together from different areas of study. Thank you for occasionally sparking a passion for learning Ken. Humbley yours Paul.

Oh boy...honestly, I just turn everything off around me and in my mind to absorb the high quality information that Ken is uploading, so that I can absorb scant parts of it. Rinse. Repeat. To perhaps gather the conceptual parts of some of the rest of it. Not complaining that I am lacking certain components of (public) education that I've allowed to keep me complacent in these areas of acute information, but at least I'm here trying to keep up. Thanks, Ken. I'll be here trying to interpret what I don't fully understand, in order to teach my son things I may never completely understand. He can start a fire without a lighter or matches and can hunt, so that's at least a thing. Cheers

Finally!!!! everything it's beginning to come together and make sense to my, Thank you "maestro"!!!!

Well I will say that its easier to comprehend your definitions than the mathematical squiggly looking equations that I don't have words or buttons on the phone to type when trying to wrap my brain around how this world works 😅 I read something earlier that was talking about a planet surviving without a sun and that has me thinking on these auroas and how they produce these synthetic airglow and the global electric circuit... Then I watched the Dark Crystal for the first time and came to watch this immediately after the movie ended😂 It's all pretty extraordinary that we live in this crazy and beautiful place, no matter how it all works and even if I never figure out how or why, I'll just be grateful Im here at all.... ❤

Amazing book, and amazing video!

Glad to see Ken's video as the first video in my feed. Thank you Ken!

if you want to know what Love looks like, hang around this guy for a bit

Yasou Ken, this is one of the most concise, comprehensive, and simplex explanations of Energy and all its attributes to date; it's incredible! My colleagues refer to the atomists as "Those seeking the God Farticle"...

Ken this is amazing! I was just having this conversation with my highschool son this afternoon! Wow! Something in the aether I guess!

One of your best videos in awhile! Love it. I'm proud to say I am able to understand perhaps 80% of it. 🤓

I have been revisiting the energy frequency and vibration video, I really appreciate the break down in this one and the article! Thank you 🙏

Just seen this one posted less than 5 mins! Top 10 to post first. Good evening Ken!

Many years of listening to your explanations ken, things are finally becoming clear. I've found that mental visualisations, mental shapes and symbols, like visualising a Torus for example, draws the listener closer to clarity and understanding. I totally agree, extending ones vocabulary just little by little will really help. To anyone reading this, try exercising your powers of mental visualisation, something symbolic, then add the words later on, with practice you can achieve. ❤

There he is! Sorry I missed the midnight livestream, when I woke up I saw the notification and I was very excited, then I saw what time it was and I realized I missed it. Very sad all day. 😢

This is easily the greatest video I have enjoyed and understood from you. It was concise, accurate and educational. It purified my knowledge of physical and some metaphysical phenomena. The understanding and application of these truths are extremely inspirational.

Elegant, clear, beautiful 👏

A friend and roommate recommended me to your channel. I find the content quite fascinating. Although I'm scratching my head about many issues, I'll confine myself to one for the sake of brevity. It hinges on no-thing versus nothing. The former is apprehensible to me; the latter strikes me as a concept. In the analogy of a donut and the hole in the middle, the hole is an instance of no-thing - no particular thing. Yet the space in the middle is still not nothing; it clearly is something. What I'm suggesting (beyond the donut analogy) is that if space is a highly refined or subtle something, it may nonetheless have properties. Or rather: properties which we as yet don't detect, properties which currently elude us. In other words, it's possible for no-thing to be a highly refined something, subtle matter. One possibility is that space is like water containing and affecting fish. It depends on what exactly you mean by the term "space". I don't automatically regard space and nothing as synonymous. It's not clear to me (not obvious) that space necessarily has no properties, because it need not be nothing. Even if space has no air, no oxygen, it doesn't follow it's nothing - though, indeed, it's inhospitable to human life. I should add that while there may well be a climate of conservatism in academia, I seriously doubt that what we have is simple Einstein idolatry, with highly trained scientists just accepting "curved space" because Einstein said so. It's far more probable that physicists, by and large, accept that still because repeated experiments keep confirming what Einstein said. Most reject the concept of ether and I don't think it's because of bias or crusty conservatism, but because of good solid reasons. The Michelson and Morley experiments are often cited in this regard. Steinmetz himself rejected it. Perhaps ether DOES play a role, but then much more work would have to be done. Many, many were intelligent enough to consider the possibility that "space has no properties". The likely reason they don't hold to that view is that experiments have shown or strongly suggest otherwise. Much would be gained if a scientist were to apply himself to prove Einstein wrong, notoriety if nothing else. Scientists could score a lot of points that way. For every rebellious Galileo there are countless others who simply offer untenable theories. Maybe the experiments haven't been rigorous enough. It's far more likely that one is wrong. In science there are no authorities, and if some theories are not taken seriously, it's probably because they're either bullshit or there's little or not enough support for them. If you introduce a new theory which largely contradicts Einstein's, you need to put in a lot of work to SHOW where he's wrong. Engaging in elaborate metaphysics, or using metaphysical jargon, isn't going to cut it. When it comes to the universe and the countless theories about it, the old analogy of an elephant in a dark room may be useful. One person feels the tail, another the trunk, and so forth. The trouble arises when the person, feeling the tail, says: "Now I've got it, now I understand." In other words, the trouble arises if the person, feeling the tail, claims that the one feeling the trunk has got it wrong. They have different perspectives - and our perspectives, in large part, have something to do with how the human body, or particular human bodies, brains, nervous systems, and so forth, are made. Something is to be said of different language games and perceptual systems, even temperament, as well. Just when you think: "This is the way the universe is or works", 100/200 years later some human being claims that the past fellow got it wrong. What we can say is that some perspectives/theories logically work better than others. At least for a time, they seem that way. But I can't be sure that in some other world in a different galaxy there are no intelligent beings with a form of mathematics which we would find utterly illogical. They may also think the concept of "aether" is nonsense. Who knows.

Yay! Ken chat! Just clicked on the tubes

An alternate way to say a ground is to a say a capacitor. A capacitor is a ground is a sink and upon being discharged to can be considered a source (charging a capacitor / charging a sink). Amperes seek the path of least volts is electrical grounding in summary of introduction (electrical theory and practice). None of that overrides what is in the above video or attached PDF (DEFINED: ENERGY, EMISSION, MEDIUM, GROUND, & PARTICLES) rather if energy cannot be created or destroyed then it can be recycled. A hydroelectric dam does that on a very regular basis (does not burn fuel and generates power). Amperes are dielectric as are coulombs and volts are not heat either. If the lightbulb does not get hot then its not Thomas Edison. A small hint for recycling energy.

Exceptional simplification Ken. Your focus is to the nth degree my friend. Like you have mentioned "The truth will out" Thank you xxx

Thank you, Ken.

Reading the universal one really helped to understand

Much appreciated clarification. ..

Melt my brain, Ken. ❤️

Good morning Mr Wheeler. Always a pleasure. Wolverines!!

Well ken 99% of the population will be told all they will ever know. 🤷 Ive always respected the being admitting they do not understand. They lean on truth not whats popular.

Thank you beautifuly explained I’m enlightened finally put it all together in my mind

First time viewer, and although I most definitely didn’t understand all your points I did catch some, really interesting.

Yhank you for this podcast of knowledge and Wisdom

Thank you Ken 🙏🏻 ❤️‍🔥 🖖🏻!

Thanks - I love your homework

Btw please do go down the rabbit hole of simplicity is divinity! I would not be borred at all as innately i know this in a deep way but have a harder time defining in words like if i wanted to explain it... your the best!

We had the most beautiful southern lights here in South Africa from the solar flare-up. sure you can look up some pics...

i have got no idea what youre talking about... But I LOVE IT!!!

Two high school girls from New Orleans on 60min tv show proved Pythagoras therom in trigonometry i hope tgey are correct please check them out ken they seem so innocent and they themselves don't seem to understand what or how they solved it but thru a simple method they saw i hope they are right heartwarming interview of them

Great talk as usual!🙌☀️👍

The center must hold. Thank you for the superavaible correct definition of Energy.

Let's take the wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics as an example and explore how we could formalize it using logic, math, and physics within the monadological framework. First, let's define our basic entities and relations: - Let M be the set of all monads (fundamental psychophysical entities). - Let Ω be the set of all possible observational contexts or perspectives. - Let R be a relation on M × Ω, where (m, ω) ∈ R means monad m manifests observable properties in context ω. Now, let's formalize the wave-particle duality: - Let W be the set of wave-like properties (e.g., interference, diffraction). - Let P be the set of particle-like properties (e.g., localization, quantization). - For any monad m ∈ M and context ω ∈ Ω, we have: - (m, ω) ∈ R ⟹ (∃w ∈ W: m manifests w in ω) ∨ (∃p ∈ P: m manifests p in ω) - (∃w ∈ W, p ∈ P: m manifests both w and p in ω) ⟹ (w and p are complementary in ω) In other words, for any given monad and observational context, the monad will manifest either wave-like or particle-like properties, and if it manifests both, these properties will be complementary (i.e., not simultaneously measurable with arbitrary precision). We can formalize this further using quantum logic and the mathematical framework of Hilbert spaces: - Let H be a Hilbert space representing the state space of a quantum system. - Let |ψ⟩ ∈ H be a state vector representing the state of a quantum monad. - Let W and P be projection operators on H representing wave-like and particle-like observables, respectively. - The complementarity of wave-like and particle-like properties can be expressed as: - WP|ψ⟩ ≠ PW|ψ⟩ (non-commutativity of observables) - ΔW⋅ΔP ≥ ℏ/2 (Heisenberg uncertainty principle) Here, the non-commutativity of the wave and particle operators and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle formalize the idea that wave-like and particle-like properties are complementary and cannot be simultaneously measured with arbitrary precision. Finally, we can connect this to the physical world by noting that this formalism accurately predicts the results of experiments like the double-slit experiment, where quantum entities exhibit both wave-like interference patterns and particle-like localization depending on the experimental setup. In summary, by using tools from logic, math (Hilbert spaces and projection operators), and physics (quantum mechanics and the uncertainty principle), we can formalize the wave-particle duality within the monadological framework as: - Quantum monads manifest either wave-like or particle-like properties depending on the observational context. - When a monad manifests both wave-like and particle-like properties, these properties are complementary and cannot be simultaneously measured with arbitrary precision. - This formalism accurately predicts the results of real-world quantum experiments. This demonstrates how the monadological framework can provide a coherent and mathematically rigorous foundation for understanding and formalizing the both/and nature of quantum reality. Similar approaches could be used to formalize other both/and examples using the appropriate logical, mathematical, and physical tools.

The Grand Center! I knew it! Although I believed we were circling a black hole. Thank u!!

I like this video. This subject is very interesting and I think it is taking me many videos to absorb Slowly . I'm starting to understand.

Thank you! 💜

Thanks brother Ken . Grabity, mass and density relative to the medium ❤ Love and Light to all ❤🤙🏽

GREAT SHOW KEN

You explain things very well. We've literally been lied to about every single thing in this realm.

I'm into Walter Russell's Secrets of Light, profound is an understatement . Thanks man .

Very interesting, thank you.

Love this channel

Excellent video, thank you, Uncle Kenny. I look forward to reading the PDF. If people could just understand that all things are dielectric fields, which are a torsion on the Aether. Contemplate the inverse of space, and watch any and all of Uncle Kenny's videos on magnetism, it truly is the path toward the Absolute and understanding. I have used retroduction logic to understand the voice and singing on a totally different level. What you are actually doing to the source of the sound is disturbing the air between the true folds, in turn this disturbs the Aether, therefore the dissipation of disturbed Aether is the voice. You are not actually trying to "push" sound out of you, you are just trying to disturb the air at your true folds. Think of the true folds as the centre of torus, i.e. the inverse of space, the field induces out through the mouth. Basically, a quasi point source, one that can be improved. If you understand what I have said and practice singing, if you apply it you will see vast improvement. #theaether #theall #theone

Ken: even as college graduate with a STEM degree very few are interested in your lectures on physics. There may be a great market for that on a different format.

Hi, Ken. Great work, as always. What are your thoughts about Copper (pyramids, coils, et.c.) for healing/repairing the body.

Thank you for explaing some of the thoughts I have had for years. I now can look at the world(s) in a different ("light") now. Dipoles and dilectric is the reality of the universe. No you were not dry ,one could say moist. Ha Ha Ha -keep up the good work.

Thanks!

My apologise for that, and thank you again for your knowledge and wisdom and always telling truth

Thank you.

Can u demonstrate this somehow in an observable and repeatable way?❤ also shade of moonlight is warmer than the actual moonlight! Its called density/ bouyancy things fall or rise relative to being more or less dense than their surrounding medium no gravity required! Keep up thinking outside the box brilliant!

Great video!

I really want to understand this. Wish you cud explain this in a way us visual learners can understand. Thanks!! Oh u ate providing the article. That will help. .

Tack!

could you speak of the vajra, or perhaps some of malcolm bendalls work, possably the thunderstorm generator, at least you could tease, if you merit, or not.... i always enjoy your content, always a breath of fresh, loved those little duckies dude!!

Thank you! 💜 Do you archive your livestreams somewhere?

Ken been watching you a long time. Back when I first started in digital photography. Have you ever checked out Vibes of Cosmos? I’d like to hear your input on his/her channel. I personally think it’s great.

Simply the Best. Lol. I totally have enjoyed this session. When can we meet again? Hahaha.

I very much admire your undying passion for the color blue. Thanks for sharing your knowledge and passion, Ken!

Tell us more about copper and how really free electricity is and how confused we all are, so much so that we don’t question being charged $$$ to have it. Thank you. 🎶🎯💥🌸 🐝kind. peace+&-

Thx Ken!

Regards, thank you DEAR 🤗🌻

The way I understand "gravity" is that it is an agreed upon average of downward acceleration. Wouldn't it be better served by just calling it that? Or just "average downward bias?" I think the "flerf" issue with calling it "gravity" is that most ppl think it is a force that is constantly pulling things to the Earth, yet we can manipulate the gravitas of an object by altering it's electrostatic charge. So, isn't mainstream science labeling the "effect" gravity, thereby making it seem like the causal factor?

Hi Ken can you do a video on Malcom Bendalls plasmoid unification model and the Malcom Bendall engine its supposed use plasmoid technology to break down carbon atoms

Wet as a whistle ' not dry at all sir.

Hey Ken whats going on. It was Green here on Friday! Is laser hair removal safe?

here's and odd one to look at. when negative was rge power side in cars. they did not rust like they do now. hum!

Have you looked into The Martin Fleishmann Memorial Project yet? Bob Greenyer seems to have figured this out fairly well... They're getting repeatable results that look more promising than anything I've ever seen. And that includes the Safire Project.

I simply love you. From Chitral KP.

I feel like I'm back in school, thinking 'huh'

Yeah, well something has to be said for the magnetic force on the back of everybody’s head and pretty much anything else that’s growing as well out of the soil

Very Good talk.

Hi Ken. What do you say to the statement that a radio active element is not itself radioactive, rather the element is a receiver, geometrically designed to attract radio activity from the aether compounding it's effect. If you take that element and send it down a hole in the ground, at a certain depth it looses it's radioactiveness.

🔑🙏

Serious question. What is your take on the Kaluza-Klein theory?

Ken have you seen the Terrence Howard episode of the Joe Rogan experience? He speaks of many of your ideas. I think you would find his ideas fascinating and in confluence with your own ideas.

Heya Ken, love your work, could you or anyone please clarify what you mean by "Light is not a wave"? Since it is a propagating disturbance (hysteresis) of the ether, is that not definitionally a wave? Tesla said light is sound waves of the ether too.... Many thanks and much love :D

Hello Mr Ken 😊😊

Since C is the limit which the medium can move against itself, does this mean a transverse dielectric field perturbation would also be limited to C, and a longitudinal magnetic field perturbation would exceed C?

What is the rate of induction for light in space?

Also can u explain - under your theory which from my limited understanding, seems correct - how the solar storms affect our magnetic field.

Thanks 🫡

i still think lights rate of induction is limited by the magnetic field and not the capacitance of the dielectric field. If it was the capacitance light would self destruct as the capacitance gets so high it blast a hole to return back to the aether. Magnetic hysteresis still applies to light? if so this take time. ill look at the original 20 maxwell equations

What is your definition of a force. I consider it to be anything that causes a change in position or pressure. Gravity is a force by that definition. Gravity is a force but, force doesn't have to be Gravity.

What is Diamagnetism? (Ok...we have four "things"... Magnetism and dielectricity... Electricity and gravity/mass... Force and motion, inertia and acceleration.) But what is Diamagnetism? What's diamagnetic?

Is Sun the shower head and black hole the drain?

Some Illustrations would be useful, nonetheless great content, as every time.

What's going on with the 0ne multipled by one should equal 2. If there is a 1 then u take another 1 and X them how can the answer be 1. Where does the other 1 go. Trence Howard. I think he is on u tube. Sorry but it sort of makes sense

They aren't big words, but this information is very condensed. For example, Capacitance is the ability of a material or device to store electric charge. Is the definition on Google. Which is from people that don't know what electricity is. And I would bet that your definition is very different. This video is the opposite of one of your simpler, standing in a pond making waves, videos! We have to study the definitions. Good one though. Isn't that the plan ? Teach people the basics, and later, put it all together.

What do you think a "black hole" should be called? I prefer light well.

Are consciousness and the soul the same thing and are they fundimentally made of ether? I find your work best accounts for the anomalies that mainstream science ignores. Thanks ken

How about doing a video on the matter to energy warp drive , it very interesting. Free energy ? it claims. its on the Alchemical Science page