you are right Kevin lol go for mirrorless so we can enjoy buying good lenses for our DSLR camera

*Laughs in canon L lens

Thank goodness, ahh could never afford those ridiculous $1000 lens the costs barrier to the hobby

@@UsapangDiskarteOnline hahah that's what i thought, I'm going to mirrorles yo enjoy DSLR wtf!

Same idea, now I can buy pro cameras at a cheaper price,,,, hahaha

same

I just finished watching this and it's 3am lol

To be honest, cellphone cameras are much more difficult to operate.

Also I can’t even afford the camera

@@gamechannel1271 This is what I'm hoping as a videographer/photographer wannabe

Me too!

😂😂, World going update, and u backdated!!

I love the sound of the Mamiya RB-67 vintage film camera (Big mirror)

yomero0666 check the pentax 67

You do still get that sound with Mirrorless as the sensor gets covered just before exposing for the photo!

I have the Canon m200

I'm about to purchase another cannon is been a while for... I'm considering a 90D and a EOS R.... as a hybrid camera...which would you recommend and have you used the new R lens or using an adapter....for dslr lens

@jlang1959 HI, I own both the 90D and the R7. The R7 is the better camera. I did buy it with the 18-150mm RF kit lens. But I also bought the adapter to use all my older EF lenses as well. But I find myself rarely using and other lens than the kit lens. I mostly do some general photography and shoot video of special events at my church. I usually throw my 90D on the tripod using the 18-135mm lens for filming. Then I use my lighter to hold R7 to take stills and also zoom in for some closeups to film. I also us a Rodes microphone on the 90D to capture sound.

@SchardtCinematic I appreciate the response... but question was about the EOS R and 90D... I can't really validate paying for an R5, R6 or R7 for my use, the question I guess is should I just be going mirroless at the point? The 90D and EOS R are at simular price points and like the middle of the field

@jlang1959 Mirrorless is definitely the way to go. What is your price range? I'm on B&H website now. I figured the EOS R was discontinued by now. But I guess not. So that's good. It lists for $1,104.95 currently brand new. What kind of photography are you into?

😂

LOL, this is so me

lol

Most mirrorless cameras don't have the top deck LCD screen, that most DSLRs have on top. That thing is so badly needed. With that small LCD, the rear one can be completly closed, all settings are on the top one.

That also means getting lenses for each!

LOL

@Raphael Cabrera >>> It will not be so much of a _pain in the neck_ anymore...😊

U could before, it was just more of a guess and check process 😜 or eyeball and shoot from the hip

dslr has live view too ,, where the mirror isnt used so you can see vampires :P

@@TheKlingis but not focuse as fast.. Idk they blur the accent already

underrated comment, lol

@@thomasfeldman3613 iinterchangeable

llens

Pervs rule the world rn

OMG.

If people just stop buying these things, the price would easity drop to 2-3k or even less.

Most mirrorless cameras don't have the top deck LCD screen, that most DSLRs have on top. That thing is so badly needed. With that small LCD, the rear one can be completly closed, all settings are on the top one.

Until you test it

2 years later are you still using DSLR? Curious

Keep in mind you are getting lens cropping with DSLRs, something both film and mirrorless cameras do not face. With mirrorless 50mm is 50mm, same as film.

Exactly this!

No one has ever proven that a god exists....

@@iwaswithyourmom9410 and I am Santa Claus

@@HS-fk6hb and I am Satan

@@iwaswithyourmom9410 there r billions way to prove that god exist.. but the catch is u will need high iq

oh dear god. DSLR's have interchangeable lenses. Mirrorless is just a choice of a moving shutter or one that tries to be invisible...

@hanselxy So that the picture you see doesn't change between pressing the shutter and actually taking a picture.

Good content...but totally biased for Sony / Canon possibly. Olympus mastered mirrorless, and IBIS 5 first...but you didn't say anything about them...again you brought other brands them.

Santa PM i mean, people mostly buy canon and nikon so

Lol

If you're looking for a camera for commercial use I'd suggest one of the Sony mirrorless cameras, but they're not cheap and neither are the lenses. So if you don't plan on using the camera a lot, I'd stick with a DSLR. If you want to learn more about mirrorless, search Jason Lanier on youtube, he has great reviews on all the sony mirrorless cameras.

If you want the best existing camera at the moment, then buy the Nikon d850.

If you're looking for your first camera, I'd go with an affordable mirrorless. Affordable because you'll want to upgrade in no time if you like photography, and quit if you don't. Mirrorless because that's the future. And I'm saying that as an owner of two Nikon DSLRs and nine lenses for that system. I love my gear and it gets the job done, but I feel like for a beginner in 2019, there's no reason to get used to DSLRs in a time when every company is going mirrorless. If I were you, I'd look at the Fuji X-T3, Sony a6400 or Sony a7 III, depending on budget and personal preference. Not specs, not reviews - picking them up and seeing which feels best.

@@youknowwho9247 I am afraid that a high quality affordable mirrorless does not exist as their price tag is equal to top range DSLRs. DSLRs come in much larger variety of prices.

@@paulbreedveld4921 If you're just starting photography, then getting any top end gear is a waste of money. You don't know what preferences you'll develop. I'd recommend buying a used, affordable kit and playing with that for a while. When you've developed a shooting style and discovered your likes and dislikes, then upgrade to something top notch. The number one thing you see with photography beginners is buying expensive gear that doesn't suit their needs or gathers dust on a shelf. If I were you, I'd get myself a used X-T3/X-T30 or a used a6400 after testing them in the shop and see what happens. You can always re-sell them after a few months and get that juicy full frame when you actually know what you want and need from a camera.

@Sandy Lee Well... I have the best cameras, better than DSLR or mirror-less. *My* *Eyes* *!*

@Sandy Lee do you have some brain damage?

No mention of the viewfinder though.

Without strong biases? Completely ignores non-135-format mirrorless...

@Sandy Lee I'm 53, non-snowflake, non NPC, non everything you just hurled and my astro-photos are the absolute best on my Canon DSLR's. Nothing else even comes close.... except my dedicated astro cameras. Way more technical than most even comprehend. Ease up on connecting snowflakes with DSLR's because the opposite is true. The anti-capitalist camera purchaser supports capitalism by purchasing Sony mirrorless. Kind of a known thing these days. That is after they Sell (once again, supports capitalism) their non-RAW Nikons. Good day.

Narrator: "They did not _have that edge_ in 2021, much less in 2023, the D850 came out in 2017, it's over, I'm sorry"

Very unsure about this ‘edge’ that you’re talking about. I haven’t seen a DSLR in person used professionally in two years now.

@@TheMrprosyndicateI use them professionally all the time. Mirrorless cameras are an overhyped marketing programme designed to make you spend your hard earned money on something tha is not effectively better, no cheaper, not effectively faster, no more comfortable and uses a digital view finder. A mirror is an accurate reflection of what you see, a digital viewfinder is a pixelated interpretation of what you see. It simply can’t be better than actual light. I hope Nikon and Canon keep making DSLR’s

It could have been said in less than 5 but Sony needed a lot of attention.

@@frutt5k It can be done shorter than that. Its electronics and all electronics get smaller.

16* Seconds

This video made me confused lol

HAHAHAHAH THIS IS ME NOW LOL

me too

We can cheap in😂😂😂😂😹😹😂😂

bro same lmaoo

View with no money spend can make me relieve.

This video is literally made for people who don’t own a camera

Only just noticed that. 😅

Jennifer Maple cry about it you nerd

That’s the kind of speed I want!

"Im....Fast AF.....boiiii"

So you would rather watch TV than experience life directly?

@@douggoodhill then why are you watching a screen right now? or even taking pictures, look at stuff with your eyes! who needs a camera XD that it is a tool not like you still have eyes, right?

@@douggoodhill if you experience life through a optical viewfinder i think thats more your problem

​@@douggoodhill There's a difference. An optical viewfinder can't show you much information when you look through it, since it's mostly fixed and just shows you the real word. With an EVF, you can add whatever you want; Zebras, Histograms, Focus peaking, battery indicators, settings indicators, balance level and so much more! Furthermore, you can avoid getting blinded by the sun when you aim your camera upwards, and when you adjust exposure settings you can actually see what it's going to look like before you take your shot.

Most mirrorless cameras don't have the top deck LCD screen, that most DSLRs have on top. That thing is so badly needed. With that small LCD, the rear one can be completly closed, all settings are on the top one.

@Strawberry Kiys it might seem so, but he still defined the terms quite well, he deserves some credit for that. Canon's dual pixel Auto Focus system tracks subjects by detecting light and colour. It applies the rules of composition quite well and it does so by tracking subjects in the depth of field given by the lenses, but the Phase Detect system by sony is somewhat different as the sensors intelligently tracks faces when the subject is placed at a distance and eyes when the subject is much closer. I'm a canon shooter, I use the canon 6dii 80d, 800d and the 750d and I'm quite conversant with the dual pixel autofocus system as it's made my work easier, though I havent used sony cameras so much, I know phase detect is much better with subject tracking after using the sony a7r ii once side by side with the canon 6dii.

Doesn't really matter. When you just need a car to drive around town, you don't need to know all of the inner technical details of the latest Tesla.

@@touristguy87 so making informed purchasing decisions when spending thousands of dollars is a bad idea?

@@Kelson01 ...so making informed decisions is a bad idea? it's so funny when people think they are smart when they are actually being quite stupid. You want a camera to take pictures with. You probably already own a camera, if you own a cellphone. It costs you nothing. To buy anything else to take pictures with will cost you money. So why would you buy another camera when you already have one? How much information do you need to know to make a good decision in this situation?

Most mirrorless cameras don't have the top deck LCD screen, that most DSLRs have on top. That thing is so badly needed. With that small LCD, the rear one can be completly closed, all settings are on the top one.

@@touristguy87 You must be a total gas at parties, what with your superiorist, dismissive attitude. Tell us more about what a genius you are and what a bunch of bumpkins we are.

Mirrorless also have real, mechanical shutters. It just doesn't have a mirror. Silent shooting (electronic shutter) is an option on both DSLR and mirrorless. So not sure what your point even is here.

@@AQHackAQ i didn't have enough information on mirrorless mechanics 😂

point is, its easy to adapt more lenses without worrying about hitting the mirror

I love the clunk of dslr cameras but all I have is mirrorless. Maybe I can go full dslr crazy and get a Pentax or something wacky in the future. But for now mirrorless gets the job done.

@@13_cmi all the artist's choice. DSLRs have a better shutter sound. I got BMP6k Pro but lack of shutter sound depresses me, like in some situations, it's a blessing for silence and in others, it feels lonely 😂😂😂😂 But, the solution is, to have a mirrorless, dslr and... drumroll... slr, for that saxy shutter sound and all the mechanics. So, it's just a choice and based on what your project demands. Enjoy all. Paint on canvas, glass, photoshop, vr, hologram or let AI do it. 🤘🏽

Yeah, most channels simply assume you know this information already.

It's funny, though I had a film SLR back as a teen, I really got into photography right when the first mirrorless cameras came out ... in 2009! I was going to buy a DSLR, but after seeing the Panasonic Lumix GF1, I decided that I had to have it. Been using mirrorless ever since. So, for me, it hasn't "come out of nowhere" at all, but rather has been a long, slow road to the cameras that we have now. There were always advantages to mirrorless systems, but they were outweighed by the early technological deficiencies (e.g., really bad low-res, laggy EVFs.) In 10 years, though deficiencies have all by gone away, while the advantages have strengthened. With a few niche exceptions (e.g., top-end sports), they are at least a viable alternative, if not a clearly better choice.

I think they blew up so much because companies like Sony and Fuji shattered the market with those all of a sudden. They were just as good as the pro DSLR with a few drawbacks which are easy compromisable. They offered new technologies and advantages. They also offered the promise of being lighter and less noticable. Technically the first ever phone with a camera was a mirrorless camera - but as said, most companies didn't want to adopt those for interchangeable lens systems. Look at Canon and Nikon who went along when Sony released their Sony Alpha 7RIII (generally speaking, their Alpha 7 (R/S) III line) and they have many of the drawbacks the first Sonys had (if I remember this correctly and got told so correctly by reviews). It's awesome to see them on the rise and I wish that companies will focus more on them while not letting down DSLR. And it is also very complicated being all the time on top of the technical side of photography, even I as a "gear-addict" (I love to see new gear and see reviews and read all the things about them and stuff ... The only way I can live it out since I got no money) have problems keeping up with all the news. Surely, I didn't learn anything new about mirrorless cameras from this video but I'll recommend it to all the people who wanna know and wanna know especially the differences of those. This video is pure gold! :D Have a nice evening/day/morning, whenever you might read this! :D

less moving parts = camera will no doubt live longer too.

@@niclikescakes nope. That's not a given. Just because a DSLR has more mechanical parts to potentially fail does not mean that they're short-lived or have a shorter lifetime than mirrorless. Food for thought: all the technical parts which weren't a thing in DSLR can break/fail, too. It's all about using it correctly. My EOS 600D/Rebel T3i has not once let me down (except, I didn't reload the batteries... Which is... Stupid, to be honest). It's still doing it's job after almost six years. So, the thing is, we also have to assume how long cameras are being used by people. Camera bodys get changed more frequently than lenses... So, we should have to asked the average lifetime of a camera for one person (so, how long does one use it) vs the expected lifetime of a camera (how long is it useable after assembling it). I assume most DSLRs are built with at least 5-10 years of functionality. Next question needs to be: How expensive is it to replace the different parts that fail...

@@playeronthebeat I agree with you to an extent, but all mechanical systems have a potentially shorter lifespan, I'm not saying Dslrs aren't durable, but normal wear shock and other factors could have a bigger impact on the lifespan. phones are made like sandwiches because they have to withstand abuse, there are little to no moving parts, I don't see why a mirrorless camera wouldn't potentially be more durable/last longer thinking under this same idea.

If you still have lenses for it why not go for a real professional F-1?

Most mirrorless cameras don't have the top deck LCD screen, that most DSLRs have on top. That thing is so badly needed. With that small LCD, the rear one can be completly closed, all settings are on the top one.

And I thought I was the only guy that heard meerless rather than mirr-or-less

Proof that it's not always the "latest" and "trendiest" cameras that make the difference. There's also something called "knowledge" of optics, timings, light and reflection which play a major role in taking great pictures.

is it that hard to keep spare batteries charged or have the ability to charge batteries while driving? Your argument could be used by people who shoot using film and manual cameras: why buy a camera that require batteries?

@@EdwinChenLoo Life sometimes gives you lemons. I have 2 batteries, and 1 just died... firmware death (cause that's a thing lol). I'm not an actively working photog and most of my photography is my own personal stuff. If I'm going to a paid gig, OK, bring the kitchen cabinet while you're at it. But my point is that my D7200 isn't tied to a bag of batteries or a wall outlet just to whip out and go taking pictures. I've shot all day at an air show, on high speed continuous, and filled my 64GB cards on a single battery. I can literally just grab my camera with a versatile lens and run around shooting all day worry free with no bag. A film camera can't go bagless all day long on 36 shot rolls. My DSLR requires no bags of film or batteries. It just waits for me to press the button and does it's job with capacity for 1500-2000 shots.

@@EdwinChenLoo Batteries do suck though and the less the better

Let's not forget that even manual film cameras have required batteries for a very long time. I mean, they were tiny watch cell type batteries, but even the Pentax ME Super that was my first "real" camera required a battery (or several when I attached the auto-winder)

Yeah for real, my DSLR can hold a charge for like 1 week straight on vacation its awesome. I always take a spare battery but rarely change it. I have a nikon d5500. With 35mm f1.8 nikkor and a 11-16 wide angle f2.8. I'm planning on getting a full frame soon.

used no less XD

😅😅😅

You can definitely find good deals I got my camera with a carrying case, extra battery and extra lens for 500

@@lordtickledck7012 Damn nice

Tzar Nicholas II of Russia i got a nikon d5300, 3 lens (ones $2700 when it came out), 2 high quality tripods, a lume cube, and a $100 camera bag (and other accessories) all for $600. a steal i say

How is it?? I'm about to go a6400 to a7r3

Mirrorless is probably much better for making movies. Some mirrored DSLR's make movies, but to do so locks up the mirror at which point it is effectively mirrorless.

If you watched this video, you now know more than the entire staff at Best Buy.

How different is it compared to my D90 ? 🤭

@@elvisspada 90D is totally different from D90 and that's just obvious

Anshul Saini Are you sure? Maybe they just switched D and 90 in the model name!

@@elvisspada believe me, I'm pretty sure 😄

K

I still don't get it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@@kelajuan_ It works using a black box filled with FM...

Why even beginning with FILM?! Must be super expensive to develop etc, no editing possible at all except the traditional, "complex" methods... i began more serious photography in about 2009 as the EOS 400D was released, with a digital camera i have at least "free" film and shootout doesnt matter, only restricted by the memory card size which was even in the early DSLR days A LOT BIGGER than any stills film camera. Even from a creative standpoint i see an EVF a lot better than an OVF... focus peaking for manual focus, too awesome and needed! exposure simulation... what you see is what the the image will look like pretty much! On OVF/DSLR you have to trust the internal exposure simulation and check images. customizable screen/infos like buffer bar for bursts etc. no blackout while shooting low light... you just see modern mirrorless cameras outperform also the average DSLR in autofocus performance. I could use my EOS RP with a 1.4 lens as a "light amplifier" especially on the OLED EVF, not so much on the horrendous backlight bleeding LCD. On a OVF you see NOTHING.

@@harrison00xXx it was a school photography course with full access to a darkroom. It was a great way to learn a new method of making art, and not being narrow minded. As someone who works in an office, it feels like I live my life staring into a computer screen. You can stick yet another screen an inch from your eyeball, but I’ll pass.

@@harrison00xXx Film might be the best way to learn photography. It forces you to stop and think about your shot. You need to learn how to know what it's going to look like before you take the photo. It makes you work harder to avoid wasting film, and it prevents you from just taking a thousand shots until you get a good one by happenstance. If you roll your own, you can get some decent film (kentmere) for $4/roll, and chemicals are cheap. It's easy to rapid fire shoot digital and get good shots while learning nothing. As for viewfinders, they're both cool, but EVFs are a pain when you're shooting with a flash because its black at those settings. There's probably a way to get around this, but I prefer it when the viewfinder just works and the back display shows all the electronic stuff.

@@derp195 The obvious counterpoint to that is, if it takes a thousand shorts to find _that_ good photo, you are a heck of a lot more likely to get it with digital. Being conservative with the shots because of the cost, time and effort also means you're more likely to miss that shot. I agree, you'll value a photo taken with a film camera more, because of that long process, but I am not sure it makes you better in any way. The best athletes in the world don't limit their training as much as possible to become better. They grind and grind until it's all second nature. The electronic viewfinder gives you the view of what your camera sees, while a mirror view finder only shows you what your eyes can see. SLR and DSLR are cool in their way, but they are falling short on all points with cameras using the same lens and sensor makes.

@@duckofdeath3266 That's why I shoot digital when I'm doing a job, but I still think film is better to *learn*. If you shoot digital, you can take as many photos as you want. That means you aren't thinking about what you need to do to get a good photo as much as you are rapid fire shooting because you know you'll get some stuff you can work with. To be a good photographer, you can't rely on getting lucky, you need to know exactly how to get the shot when it presents itself. You need to know how the photo will turn out before you press the shutter, and that doesn't come from taking as many photos as possible, it comes from being forced to think about each shot. I don't think the sports analogy is very appropriate. Maybe something more like shooting a target with a bolt action rifle vs machine gun. They both end up hitting the target, but the person who learned with the rifle will be more accurate, because they were forced to be.

That's the greatest advantage for me as well. I have a Sony RX100 for 2 years now and I highly recommend it for trips. It has great image quality and it's really portable.

They often do have a technological advanatge too, with the latest and greatest features.

@Emily Bishop That's not all there is to it.

I said that about my D810, then I shot in my studio with an A7r111 and sold my Nikon gear and went full Sony. Now I really have no complaints :P

I still use a D50. Still works great for me!

Same here, have smaller cameras and the batteries just do not last, no good for any kind of remote location. D750 has been my favourite for a couple years now.

Wierckx apparently you have no clue what you’re talking about. The battery issue was solved in Sony cameras with the latest range and they outlast dslr batteries with ease. You’re just using the typical “I’m afraid of change so I’ll make up some reason not to” argument. You’re obviously talking from an ignorant standpoint and have never used something like and a7111 or a9, because if you had used one you’d know that they far out perform a d750. Nothing in the Nikon line up can compete with the a9 for auto focus, not even a d5. Maybe stop listening to fuckwits like the angry photographer and actually use the camera yourself before drawing an uninformed conclusion?

Just a Globe lol I hear that. I've been looking at the camera as well. But I can't justify spending money on new gear when I simply don't have the need for it just yet

just craft fusion cells bro

@@jedediahoakwynn-dough5769 ain't no nuclear powered camera

Jared Santiago haha. what age do you guys live in? the 21st century? hahaha.

@@jedediahoakwynn-dough5769 Sorry for not annexing canada

Use film then. Film cameras tend to be more rugged too. Good for shooting in the wild.

When I see inside a Mirrorles is like watching someones brain!!! The mirror protects the sensor of a DSLR

If I'm correct he didn't use any of the camera body examples to actually shoot, so maybe he doesn't even use them anymore and that's why he is so comfortable showing us how they work.

@@emilianoarenas7577 yup, that's what I thought. Or they are on their way to refurbishment anyway.