Wonder how many comments saying that line i can find here. Probably a lot, but anyways, tbh this video was pretty darn cool, dashcam or not

So it's not "photorealism" is it is "dashcam realism"

@@billyccall5774 photos/videos from dash _cameras_ aren't photo like? Anyway you're missing the point, If there were a different looking image set it were trained on, it'd look just like that set instead. Dash cam footage is largely available and very complete.

nice pfp

The problem is that it doesn't fit GTA 5s location or art style, I could've easily mistaken this for GTA 4, as that game is way more washed out and visually boring like the photorealism captured from Germany.

and oversaturated bikini girls for clickbait

too bad they didn't use realism examples of hoes

Its not a mod its a pre recorded video put in a image Enhancer network

In NVR you can set Less, Default, or More puddles. I think it’s the same with NVE. But all the “RTX Graphics in GTAV” video creators usually use the More Puddles option

Fr

If you put 4k texture on everything the game wouldn't be able to run at a high fps

@@jenkathefridge3933thats not the point.

@@TheBlueNeutron Then whats the point?

@@jenkathefridge3933 The point the Original Commentator made was that in Life not everything is crisp. Sometimes objects can lack details and such, but if you have 4k Textures the Details often still stay visible even from afar, which doesnt always happen in real Life.

@@anti1917 That is true

​@Cristiano dos Santos Gomes That's because it's probably ✨gReEn✨

Check out "Unrecord"

It's very possible to do this in real time. It's just that it's ugly as hell and most companies would rather make pretty visually appealing games than ugly realistic games.

​@@harrasikaCan't run on consoles yet so it ain't happening.

@@phelan8385 You don't need this specific image enhancement model to achieve these results. They had techniques in like 2015 that ran just fine and delivered an insanely realistic experience. As the person you replied to said, it won't happen because people will complain that it looks ugly. Life is ugly 99% of the time.

Its like it was recorded with a shitty camera lol

@@deus1784 No not at all the overall technology is amazing and putting this is strictly false, with a bit of tweaking the system can create sharpened high res image.

@@_vallee_5190 yeah but it still looks like it was recorded with a shitty camera

@@_vallee_5190 You misinterpreted that as a negative while Deus was in fact trying to use it as a positive, it truly looks like we're looking through a dashcam

Even the "vistas" version looks less realistic. Not 100% sure why and maybe it's just me, but it feels like because it has more color, the aliasing other artifacts art more noticeable and it doesn't look as real as the desaturated dashcam version.

that is exactly how it was made if i understand correctly. All of the reference shots were taken from a dashcam in that mercedes they show.

@@user-fc5ou7pn2k well more of a camera than a dash cam but yeah basically

Bruh look at 7:40

Which arguably makes it photorealistic, as to get these shots you yourself would be behind the windscreen, probably with a dashcam The funny part is, while driving in a straight line, my mind is totally convinced I'm watching a dashcam, but the second the car turns, the illusion is broken. I love video games :]

They used a model trained via photos taken from a dashcam with a windscreen obscuring it. If they used a different camera and took different reference photos (something that a videogame studio's art department could manage), it would produce results that look like whatever pictures they provided. I think the really interesting part here is that they don't necessarily need to use a "better" camera or "better photos"... An art department could make artistic decisions when producing a reference photo data set; color settings, camera quality, the textures and colors and surface qualities of the objects in photos, etc would influence the end result.

and everything being permanently wet.

That is not a hot take that is a fact.

The real hot take is that while it looks more realistic, it also looks uglier. Reality is ugly, I wanna look at the overly saturated base GTA 5 instead. lol

@@DemoniteBL Then your brain my friend is melted to the core of over saturation

Hot take: graphics don't matter one single bit IF the game isn't fun to begin with, no matter how good they are.

Underrated comment.

Lmfao

Thank you for this

For real all them mfs used was water

I remember seeing a mod showcase where the sun was as close as the moon.

pretty much lol

I like how the quality loss helps to achieve the effect this is not GTA V but a car's camera

deus ex also tried similar approach iirc

yeah, but ended up looking shitty with all those effects.

@@glowiever imagine this on deus ex

they have to do this trained on realistic dashcams (or just cameras in genera). But it CAN'T be phone cameras, it has to be cameras that capture color and light correct.

nah they just baiting for views all fake

@@row8261 that one guy who never gets the joke

@@quartermaster2809 and the one guy who deletes their comment after they realise they were wrong lol

@@rayanrashid7413 lmao

that one guy who can't relate to what these people are saying because context was removed

@@astral6749 haha

Lmfao 🤣

Same

Lol

Same

It actually looks much worse, but also more realistic. I never noticed how ugly real life was before.

Perhaps because it's supposed to look like dashcam footage

this lol, was expecting him to hit a pedestrian in the end there

maybe scenes violating traffic laws are not in their dataset so may create artifacts?

Yea by driving between cars and driving on the wrong side when he was behind that bus lmao

😂

Now that's RP *GOATED*

good point

‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭ ‭

Because it was filmed with a cheap dash cam?

watch until the end

@@lddroRre I feel you

Realism at it's core wouldn't be mimicking a dashcam view, but the eyes. But this new uprising of dashcam enhancements is promising.

@@howisotamatoneoinuse7964 I think that would be impossible with current hardware, whereas dash cam versions wouldn’t. I think that’s because the dynamic range of human vision is much larger that what a monitor can reproduce - I could be wrong on that. You do make a valuable distinction tho

Bet you were on your toes when the unrecord trailer dropped

also stopped by to mention the game "Unrecord", sounds right up your alley

@@howisotamatoneoinuse7964 If you watch a dashcam, or a phone camera or whatever digital video camera, you don't think it's unrealistic or CG. It doesn't have to be human perception levels of quality to look realistic, it just needs to look like the real world the way we are accustomed to seeing it.

Nah m8, crowbar fps go brrr

Yep. that's what i'm talking about 😂😂

Lets get ptsd

I don't feel guilty.

Wdym with "slightly *more* ", do you feel guilty for killing a npc or what? XD

this isn't a mod

@@bloomingteratoma Its a mod its called ai training

@@xthinkfast No, it's literally not a mod. You can't install this to your game. Mods are used to modify the game in real time, this doesn't do that. 10 seconds to their page would have told you this, but hey I guess it's easier to be stupid than to be right.

@@bloomingteratoma Hey look, I managed to find 1 guy with a brain in the comments. You are correct, this is not a mod.

@@godthegod4491 bro go outside why you care so much ??

The model is trained on dashcam video frames so it will look like a dashcam video. Could look much better if gopro footages were used which I am sure is not available on this scale.

But its german dashcam video

thats the actual definition of realism, whereas other variations of realism is actually just 4k

It does look photo real tho

I see you didn't actually watch the video.

Fr

.

100% agree

Also GTA V's vivid color pallette was likely an artistic choice in sense that Los Santos is supposed to be a kind of bling bling uplifted lifestyle

Came here to say this

And the moon isn’t right behind the clouds.

7:47

Not at All. There is SunShine All over the World. But Most American Cities it Always looked Gray for some Reason in Real.

As stated in the video, the first set was intended to imitate dashcams, washed-out colors included.

@@SamRichardson1990 weird because LA is very bright and sunny.

Lol

That might be more to do with the lack of actual interactivity in the methodology. Movement might be all it is capable of handling, hitting a sign or deforming a car is probably not possible without serious issues.

Yo lo hacía en gta vice city

Not if you're under 18 and don't drive!

@@josex6159 ?

The only way you could think their version looks more realistic is if you’re colorblind 💀

In few papers down the line, results will be more amazing.

7:47 bumps things up a notch

@@luckys541 wink wonk

@Slam Nuts On Table Ok nut slammer 😈

GAY RIGHTS 🏳️‍🌈

lmfao

ikr it looks worse

@@arekkusu0o it looks worse and similar to GTA4, because as they said, they used images from irl germany and they were washed out grey. If they had used images from California, it would be more colorful. And they did show a better colored version at the end of video around 7:00 I think.

Finally, someone that understands and can see the huge difference. Sarcasm of course in case you didn’t notice as you didn’t in the video.

Also have to remeber these aren't 4k cameras these are basic dashcams and photos from germany. Strap on 4k cams and go to LA and its a whole different story

"i like your words magic man"

Write that down, write that down...! It's all coming together now!

@@Mystixor Literally comics that make fun of daily life and somehow make it into something that's actually funny 😂😂😂

Swag jesus The Bromans are planning to capture you please hide

I understood that reference.

REALISTIC GTA V **NOT CLICKBAIT**

Maybe its because its made by intel...

@@strongstonks7699 This is the most impressive thing they’ve released in a while then!

Maybe bcs the amount of work under this is probably a thousand times greater than of any game mod ever developed lol

How to download?

but with better fps

@@Kayshots and played with a controller at least

@@SerpentSeven777 my thoughts exactly lmao

its better and cheaper to go to LA and drive around in a rented mercedes benz, than buying a PC than can run this photo tingamagic

@@tpenoel88 what if i want los santos?

Finally someone who gets it

Wet is best 💦👍

and also makes everything colorful like a cartoon show.

@@ogblue8159 What, your world doesn't look like a constant LSD trip?

@richardhalo yea thats not real but look at the trees its just like real life ,

what are you trying to tell? that Intel's is worse? because IV is 4, VI is 6

Intel knows nothing about graphics 😂

@JET0802 yeah is there no data set for fuckin LA? you'd think that'd be one of the first places that'd have that type of thing lmao

@@fl488 im just asking because people sometimes mix IV and VI

@JET0802 I didn't get them either. Los Angeles is sunny and colorful enough to really look like that. But they come um with a German grayish landscape. Wtf??

like in those earlt 90s rap music videos.

shhh, they've only just discovered sub HD

The filter is not bad but imagine playing GTA5 like this

Donate to me instead

I was thinking the same thing

There face wont change much it would look like u have just applied some filter.

There is a person walking right near the end of the video. Can’t really see the face though. I’d imagine the training dataset probably blurs out faces anyway?

@@mbcchoudhari885 I mean it's more than just a filter so if its taught well it could prob do it

@@blzrL hmn yeah maybe

bruh they do that to show the RTX effects bruh use some brain baka

@@ThirstyEdits there's no rtx in GTA v because the game cannot handle rtx bruh use some brain baka

@@ThirstyEdits maybe screen space reflections (SSR) but not rtx, they just make the game look like shit with all of that water and they don't show anything new

Some of them don't overdo it: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Y7liZ8qC09rHh5s.html

@@user-sw2jo5ir4z Yes I know, but a lot of them just make the road look like a mirror and that's annoying

It's one of the reasons why old valve games like half-life 2 could pass for a low quality image if you squint. They're great at making colors look realistic, even if the models and textures were low quality. Rockstar has also been getting better at this lately with RDR2.

This is what treyarch needs to learn about black ops. I see black ops and think everything looks too bright and oversaturated, and that degrades the graphics.

Ya, just because your game looks PRETTY doesn’t mean it looks REAL

@@theioncow18 just play cod4

or water

Was just going to post the Turbo Encabulator lol!!!!

Is this... the panametric fam ?

Bro, I just said the same thing in my head. lol

Rockstar Retro Encabulator

They forgot to mention the non-reciprocating dingle-arm

where can i download this mod ?

Everything looks better than E&E

@@albinjt1 its not a mod

Shame to rockstar

any gta 5 gameplay is better then e&e ver

I think the problem is with the method itself, maybe it can't handle 1080p+ images yet, or maybe it takes too much processing to do, as the game was running in 20fps.

I heard 4K is only just a trip outside away

Your rather look at sub 720P videos at a 1080P? ITll still look like shit

It's an early tech. I'm sure they will be able to render in 1080 and more in the near future. But to expect something that looks this good to not have limitations is crazy. There are always limits on tech until they are refined. We all just gotta calm down and be patient lol

That's the trick with just about every "photo-realistic" claim. Blurring everything. Your brain fills in the gaps to support the illusion and you can't point at anything in particular that doesn't look realistic because it's all blurry. And if you try to point this out, they have the copout excuse of "Oh, we said PHOTO realistic. As you can see, this is blurry just like a russian dashcam". Like, dude...

Imagine they travel in time toward future to film 8K dataset and they use it on Cyberpunk ahah

One can dream... Maybe in a decade who knows, but games are getting more and more ""ultrarealistic"" or cartoonish

Just wait for a ten years. We will see them all.

so basically gta v if rockstar wasn't lazy

Imagine if a video dedicated to showing graphics off wasn't uploaded at 720p in 2021. FFS ppl

i think we need to crash a bunch of cars into buildings to train the system :D

"oops that was a real video"

I wanna see a group of people get their shit rocked by a m134

search Beam NG Drive for realistic damage simulation

@@AnthonyVD1310 unrealistic graphics tho

2 fps.

I remember when Anti-Aliasing options first appeared as 2x, it could cut frame rate by 2. So in theory if we would accept 30 frames per-second again for a while, re-renderering a frame based on AI analysis might not be THAT mad of a technique.

i dont think there will be that much of a difference cause its rendering real time photos not a model so that will help but ofc 8gb of ram wouldnt be enough i guess 12 gb of ram should be good for it tho the game is highly doubted to run no more than 30 fps so yeah thats it if you ask me i guess the minimum requirement would be, 12gb ram GTX 1050ti tho its just an assumption

@@selamentor Yep. Plus while sandbox type game is really heavy on "continuity" comparison, imagine something slower, like adventure horror or even virtual found-footage game experience.

@@magnuskallas resident evil 8 has potential tho the orignal graphics are pretty much amazing but a photos realism will change everything

WOAH

I like how you think

If they make a simple enough software it can become a Instagram/tiktok trend lmao. Input your images and the engine will render them to look as if you were inside the game.

Or we could go outside and eat an apple

@@shem269 ehhh, kinda boring.

Literally when I saw it I thought “Looks like GTA IV with better graphics”

It’s because GTA IV was basically perfect

@@OFFtheCHIZANE Only the actual main game tho. Ballad of gay tony and los mc sucked

@@swen6390 stfu theyre GREAT

@@swen6390 those where the best of dlcs for rockstar wtf is wrong with you

Exactly my thought 😂😂

"Produces less artifacts" is grammatically incorrect. Just because you are a ML researcher does not mean you know how to "write good".

French filmmakers have entered the chat

@@StereoTyp0 first how is that grammatically incorrect, just asking out of curiosity, since this is irrelevant to the point being made, because put "the end" is more a choice than anything else.

@@whyitmatters6906 "produces fewer artifacts", would be correct line. "Less" is used not supposed to be used with discrete nouns being counted. For example, if I said, "there were less people at the store", it grammatically implies that I'm referring to some measured amount, such as the mass of the people missing. It basically implies a strange observation such as, "there were 123.4 kgs less people at store". This reads as strange because it divides discrete units such as individual people. Conversely, using "fewer" with mass singular nouns is equally incorrect, e.g. "I used fewer salt to season the soup". Either way, this grammatical rule and the use of "the end" are both examples of a writing style that I would find unacceptable from a professional writer but be less offended to find in a presentation written by a professional engineer. Edit: accidentally a word.

@@lucasfoster8900 how? It looks so realistic.

Its not that good now.

Well this method is not even used by a game yet , it will take more like 20 years for this to be viable assuming computers will keep getting better.

I think games will keep their game in the cartoonish realm so people can't abuse the system. And get a ton media hate on how video games kill people lol. Pretty sure we will be living in a virtual world by 2040 :P.

@@joeroganpodfantasy42 definitely not 20 years lmao , technology grows exponentially not linearly

who are you

I'm no engineer but seeing how many processes are necessary in order to achieve the end result I think the computing power of consumer end PCs won't be able to give such an output for a little bit longer. It's doable on really beefy machines, but I doubt it's done in real time otherwise the framerate would be absolutely horrendous to look at for extended periods of time.

Whatsup asmongold

what is this "AI behaviour and intelligence" you speak of? games are as stupid as they were 20 years ago

Half Life bhopping in real life incoming!

Finally someone reasonable. So many people circlejerking about realism in the comments yet they don't realize that games looking like this have been possible for a long time, just most people actually wouldn't play a game this ugly.

No offence but your comment tells me you need to get out more. So many people these days, especially gamers live their lives vicariously through television, computer screens and dont realize the real world is actually much more colorful and sharper than anything we can experience through a screen. As for games, we still got a fair way to go before it can come close to replicating reality.

new gta 6 be like

@@furkanyldz8460 nah but the ps5 gta might

Moin Deniz 😂

Rockstar wouldn't implement this. Why? Because it would cost money to implement, and won't earn them any in return

nintendo hire this man!!!#!2!2!2!3?_?'

👏👏👏👏

Sometimes. Often. Pick one.

The joke @@osakanone

i think things would go a step further if the driver was using a controller, allowing for finer control of acceleration and turning

@@joshua7563 yeah but the problem with that is you can't do much else with a steering wheel once you hop out of the car

@@slin0053 Could have steering wheel and mouse/keyboard or controller both ready to go right next to it

@@Darkhunter218 how many people do you know have the inclination or space to set up a a steering wheel with/beside their mouse and keyboard though

@@slin0053 people who have a steering wheel

Los Angelos smells

Too bad it's impossible to get HD images of Los Angeles... /s

@@Anniemax1 ehhh not really

@@quangos9455 ehhh yes really

@@umamifan ehhh yes really

Exactly if you go back and even watch the gta 4 trailers the whole color system gave that game such an realistic feeling. I live in Germany and here in winter it very feels „grey“ and in summer „green“ just exactly like in this video. The matrix unreal engine demo felt also so realistic I think because of its „green“ colors

The colors in this video look extremely unnaturally green to me like they added a Matrix color filter on it. There is also too much greenery in general when LA does not have nearly that much vegetation that is so green. IMO although the original looks a lot more true to real life simply because it used LA for reference unlike the AI which only has data from Germany. To me the new images do not look realistic at all.

Go outside during spring or summer. Look at some grass and flowers. You might start to realize that the real world can actually be beautiful, and that “gray and gritty” doesn’t equal “realism”.

@@stijn3085 And that the place where GTA IV is set isn't colorful and pretty at all. You buffoon.

@@stijn3085 all of you are expertly wrong. The closest source to life like realism is Kodachromes. It has the sun exposure, the dark mix of colors, and the correct saturation unlike modern cameras that lack both frequencies.

Yes and no. We already deal with a bunch of people who don't even know how to model anything bespoke, going into archviz because the stock models and rendering engines are cheap and good. The low bar of entry lowers the overall value of the work, as more people flood the market offering their services (though this is visually offset by the fact that stock models and rendering engines are so good now). I observed the same issue in the field of photography - cameras got cheaper, better, smaller + the internet started offering endless tutorials and free stock (unsplash, pexels, etc) = hard to find well-paying work for everyone, because Joe Schmo can show up at the door and do it for next-to-nothing + more and more agents shift to just doing it on their phone. A lot of stuff that used to be photographic jobs - moved to 3D, where it's easier and faster. A lot of 3D also moved overseas, where a guy from India can do 3-5 jobs for the price of 1 in the west. Etc etc etc. Basically what I'm saying is - it's your own demise. Fun at the start, "yay tech!" and all that, but ultimately you'll need to change professions to put bread on the table because at some point this tech will make it impossible to make money anymore. Short-term thinking vs long-term reality.

@@TheUltimateBlooper A low barrier to entry is great. If your work is reliant on there being a higher barrier of entry, then maybe your work is shit in the first place? After all you're basically admitting it's just a synthetic barrier that is helping you. We're going to end up making the art accessible by tons more people with much less work requires, and that's only a good thing.

@@TheUltimateBlooper this is ludicrous logic. By that logic, there should be zero professional photographers. Tutorials and demonstrations mean absolutely nothing if you are incapable of doing it as a client, It's the same reason why KZfaq has videos showing how designers make their products. Sure, someone could go out and buy all the materials and tooling needed and recreate it, but the artisan relies on the fact that people's time is more valuable than simply paying the right person for the job

@@TheUltimateBlooper a bit agree with you. Archviz videos used to be super expensive and now plummeted because Lumion. But, just like another job, we need to step up our efforts harder than ever using these new technology. And don't put all of your eggs in one archviz basket, you can do KZfaq, artistry, or whatever

I want to know how ps5 version will look

Oh you don’t want footage of LA... unless it’s from the air and at night or directly looking at the ocean.

@@CJAM03 Stfu… please just stfu

@@CJAM03 as a person thats lived in LA m whole life there is some places that look a bit run down or kinda of ghetto like grove street but with more apartments but it's mostly potholes in the streets and um... well potholes ^-^

@jpeg fern cool bro

@@JovanLemon almost as cool as you liking your own comment 😎

this summarise pretty much 70% of computer graphics papers these days lmao

The competitors aren't trash per se, they're just processing the images. These guys are pulling object data from the game engine to tune the process. I'd imagine a game dev could work an engine like this into their game. Heck, rather than use libraries of dashcam footage, Rockstar could literally pull some 4K or 8K camera footage from Los Angeles themselves. Also, imagine having an on-the-fly FaceApp-style filter applied to the characters to give them real face replacements.

@@GiuseppeGaetanoSabatelli it's awesome technology! As a proof of concept I think it has a heap of potential and I'm keen to see something like this implemented to games via GPU similar to DLSS and ray tracing. don't worry my comment on the competitors was purely satirical. I just think most of these companies need to be able to explain and demonstrate in layman's terms. It just overwhelms and alienates a solid portion of the audience.

@@GiuseppeGaetanoSabatelli Personally, I didn't interpreted the competitors as being "literally" more thrash. This video is simply a demo to support their research publication, and the goal for research publication is to convince that your proposed solution is novel and effectively solve complex and relevant problems compared to other methods that already exists. So of course you will try to demonstrate that you were able to improve from other previous related work. And I think what amused me the most from reading this comment is the fact that there is a dramatic increase in the amount of papers using Deep Learning instead of manually finding better algorithms to solve quite complex problems, and they can be more or less summarised like this: "We chose an architecture like this, found these hyperparams, and now we can basically do this thing 10x times faster and better than the algorithm you guys been working on for the past 5 years" which can be quite baffling. (I am not trying to say this is wrong though, there's a limit in what we can achieve with conventional programming and ML is there of that and it's there to stay) On a side note, I don't think we are nowhere near to be using this type of technology in games. When a paper claims the algorithms work at interactive rates (so not real-time rates), it means maybe 10fps minimum. In the conclusion of their paper, they mention that their system in its unoptimized forms takes half a second for rendering on a RTX 3090 GPU, which could be improved with appropriate use of G-Buffer. I also think most people mistakenly believe that this is some kind of company putting forward a "proof of concept" to be implemented in games. They are not, the three are all research scientists working for different firms (two of them are from Intelligent Systems at Intel)

It is like a 2000s series.

Add to that better physics engines, capacity for higher asset density, and more realistic AI. The physics engines in games still make everything feel too clunky or weightless, most open world games have large maps but are often mostly comprised of shell assets which are static and can't be explored or interacted with, and interactions with most NPCs still remain immersion breaking imo.

@@Sam-ui1ll i believe that's what cyberpunk was aiming for just missed entirely

I mean speak for yourself. In my experience, the real world is FILLED with color

It makes it more pleasing to look at. The real world itself is beautiful in its own right but more boring to look at than say an 8k rain enhancer script in gta 5

@@litmus7325 Yeah. They're basing their enhancement algorithm off of dashcam footage, which explains the washed out colors.

Well it is a photorealistic enhancement. By re-rendering each frame, it naturally loses some of the vibrant colors that were deliberately decided on when coloring the scenes of the game.

@@cane870 so would you prefer to watch movies without color grading ? plus you've completely missed my point. the discoloration doesn't come from a place of photorealism but from the limitations of dash cam grade footage. I'm saying that fixing it would make it look better, not more photorealistic.

I don't find it that impressive tbh. I think rockstar could make it look like that if they wanted if they tweaked the textures (the most obvious would be to make the road texture have less contrast), car reflections (they could use raytracing nowadays) and tinkered with the color grading. However, GTA was never aiming to be 100% photorealistic. While it's very detailed and quite realistic, it always had an art style. Also, remember it's a 2013 PS3/X360 game. Like, it's good but not THAT groundbreaking. If they used it on GTA3 level graphics and get these results that would be way more impressive. But it doesn't seem to add in much geometric detail apart from the vegetation.

+

well really it's not defeated, because gta v oem graphics look better, but that was the point the colors are more vibrant, and everything is meant to be ultra realistic when in reality, everything is a bit more depressing. This program did a great job at somehow making things look more like a HD police dash cam than graphics in a video game.

7:47

I disagree, gray is REALLY beautiful. It's one of the things I miss in my small city coming from e medium city.

@@TheEmolano no gray is sucks especially if it's a car color

GTA V is neither

@@Nothing-xw4tf It's okay. You'll understand the beauty of humble colors when you're older.

It's very straight-forward stuff. They tell computer "try creating random filters until it turns pic 1 into pic 2" and eventually it works. That's all neural nets are, essentially trial and error.

@@themodfather9382 lol its because they use so many big words and abbreviations. at some points I just found myself dozing off and hearing TV static 😂😂

@@ROADHouse702 kljklklj

@@themodfather9382 its not straight forward if more than 99% of the people in the world dont know this shit.

Same well i guess it time to get deep in this field in order to gain more knowledge and opportunities .