Entangled Minds and Beyond - Dean Radin, Ph.D.

No video

Entangled Minds and Beyond - Dean Radin, Ph.D.

Рет қаралды 32,986

Күн бұрын

Anecdotal reports of “experiential entanglements” - spontaneous mind-to-mind and mind-to-matter interactions - can be found throughout history, in all cultures, and at all educational levels. For over a century, such experiences have stimulated controlled scientific experiments to explore whether the anecdotes were best explainable as coincidence, confabulation, or genuine anomalies. Based on analysis of thousands of experiments published in peer-reviewed journals, the cumulative evidence is now clear: mind-to-mind and some forms of mind-matter interactions have been demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt.
For the most part, this evidence is ignored or denied within the academic mainstream, probably because it implies that certain long-held assumptions about the nature of brain, mind and matter - assumptions that are inculcated in universities and repeated as fact in textbooks - are in some cases wrong and in others in need of radical revision. I will review the evidence for these entanglements, the resistance to the evidence, and the implications for a more mature science of the future
Dean Radin, PhD (Psychology, University of Illinois), has been
Senior Scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences since 2001. He
previously held appointments at Princeton University, University of
Edinburgh, Bell Labs, and SRI International. Author and co-author of over 200 technical and popular articles, he has also written several books including the bestselling The Conscious Universe (HarperOne, 1997), Entangled Minds (Simon & Schuster, 2006), and Supernormal (Random House, 2013).

Пікірлер: 67

@dbkurz415 9 жыл бұрын

Radin's findings are absolutely astounding, from both statistical and historical perspectives. The very idea that mind is interacting with matter and in fact manipulating it over a distance to some extent hints at a much deeper rabbit hole. Frankly, if the math was not so absolutely solid I cannot see how any 'reasonable' person could believe this. But the math is solid. The studies are solid. And repeatable. While people are free to draw wherever conclusions they want from the findings, frankly, I think that if the conscious or unconscious group or individual mind can manipulate matter over a distance then life after death is certainly in the cards.

@yvesnyfelerph.d.8297 4 жыл бұрын

To me he is like Sheldrake on steroids...

@888thisthat 3 жыл бұрын

It's not solid. I looked at the freely available data and the non-humans have more of an effect on fringes than humans do...its just different fringes and different time lags.

@kierkegaardi 2 жыл бұрын

@@888thisthat Show us

@mr.alldaaay2791 2 жыл бұрын

Yes , Show and Prove. Evidence por favor, 😆 as if you could, than u would. Have.

@toomanydonuts Жыл бұрын

I think it's funny hilarious that those two scientists set out to disprove Dean Radin and then when the results supported Dean they blamed the research.

@waterholdsasignal 2 жыл бұрын

Dr. Rabin, it's not just the mental affect. The mystery of the observer suggest a riddle. When observed, a particle takes form. When not observe, a wave takes form. Q: Why? A: Define the mystery in an observer's focus intent. 1. The visible shape or configuration of something. 2. A particular way in which things exists or appears; a manifestation. 3. The verb, bring together parts or combine to create (something). It means that when an observer exercise focus intent, the nature of being is not created automatically from a large database. It's only created when the observer becomes one with the database. The riddle of the observer is a requirement. The mystery, then, is a requiring: the observer must choose, a voluntary, free-will offering.

@crypticnomad 5 жыл бұрын

In my head I see a structure of reality where awareness is fundamental. Awareness, in my view, has 3 dimensions from which 3 dimensions of space and time are mirrored.

@QED_ 8 жыл бұрын

The more that I research this in conventional physics circles . . . the more struck I am by how much physicists admit to not understanding what is going on with quantum mechanics. QM is 100 years old now and the best that physicists have been able to do in that time is to definitively confirm by rigorous experimentation (Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser and etc) . . . that they don't understand what is going on. In fact, it seems that for maybe the first time in the history of physics . . . the amount of new stuff they don't know (dark energy, dark matter, etc) is increasing faster than the new stuff that they do. Sheeesh . . .

@batmandeltaforce 8 жыл бұрын

Dark energy and dark matter are easily explained by Infinite Wave Theory. It's the same as the light wave particle duality.

@alexandrumoise1511 8 жыл бұрын

That is because physicists have entered realms of knowledge that our minds were not made to understand. Human minds have a very good grasp on things that are medium sized: animals, cars, hands and feet, insects, water, fleas, trees and mountains even, but they are very bad at grasping things that are extremely small or extremely large. For example its very hard for people to picture the size of the earth, even when given the numbers, and it's impossible for them to picture the size of the sun, or the distances between planets in our solar system. It's the same idea with sub-microscopic things, but it gets to a whole new level when you talk subatomic. That's when things start making no sense and everything is counter-intuitive. No human mind can actually understand quantum phenomena. (we're not as smart as we think we are)

@toomanydonuts Жыл бұрын

The disagreement is between the materialists and the realists versus the people like Bohr and Schrodinger who believed that conscious participation was primary. Nobel physics 2022 has been awarded for showing there are no hidden variables. Three physicists spent almost 60 years refining the Copenhagen experiments to show spooky action at a distance is infallibly repeatable and real.

@Rado-kk9is 6 ай бұрын

Well, they seem to do a very good job at milking the petrol cow by selling weapons that fund misery and darkness around!

@Rado-kk9is 6 ай бұрын

Well, they seem to do a very good job at milking the petrol cow by selling weapons that fund misery and darkness around!

@batmandeltaforce 6 жыл бұрын

When you consider the Butterfly Effect, it is easy to see that your mindset can save your life or lose it, happy or sad, every duality known to man. We are what we want to be:)

@toomanydonuts Жыл бұрын

Changing your outlook and direction is a mental strength only some people have. Physically handicapped people sometimes work hard and do well in life because they have mental strength yet there will always be able bodies who would not be able to survive because they lack the mental skills to hold a job.

@keithtaylor4795 7 жыл бұрын

At Berkeley they took a sea worm and sensed its neurons firing with entangled particles. When that is entangled with the D-wave computer and a human brain is substituted for the sea worm. The 2 parts crystal 1 part conductor of nano size with entangled particles in the the Chrystal allowing the sound of the enviroment of the brain to map out unique brain patterns . The Mind is read from any where, perfectly. nanobugged the book to live.

@natashapope3785 5 жыл бұрын

No doubt. Check out quantum mechanics, The Julia Set.etc...and so much more. Very exciting stuff.

@_HenS_ 9 жыл бұрын

It would have been nice if there had been videos of the interference patterns actually changing during the meditation, rather than only relying on graphs.

@rickdeckard1075 4 жыл бұрын

@@mandarkumthekar8565 it would have the effect of a second observer, interfering with the experiment

@matthiasbuehlmann3388 3 жыл бұрын

Rick Deckard no - creating a graph using a sensor is an observation just as much as taking a video of it. Even if there was no sensor at all the interaction with the backplate would be an 'observation' in quantum mechanical terms. I do not believe these experimental results are correct and recreatable.

@GrayderFox 8 жыл бұрын

Oh, wow. There was a change with people, but...not the Linux box? That's...really interesting. I'll just be over here wondering how particles can differentiate between those things while quietly wondering when the world stopped making sense.

@oliverford5367 6 жыл бұрын

Consciousness must be fundamental to reality in some way.

@888thisthat 3 жыл бұрын

Nah. There was a change with the non-humans, too, but with different fringes and time lags. Radin, being the charlatan nitwit he is, only reported the fringe/lag which gave the most significant result. www.quora.com/What-do-physicists-think-of-Dean-Radins-double-slit-experiment-demonstrating-how-consciousness-collapses-the-wave-function/answer/Clayton-Otey

@GrayderFox 3 жыл бұрын

@@888thisthat So, I watched this video five years ago and haven't thought about it since, but I will say to the uninitiated that link isn't great proof. I get the general idea but it just kind of becomes a wall of text. Also claiming the guy is a crank isn't a great argument. Just makes it seem like you want him to be wrong. But I get that you're invested enough to comment in the first place.

@richardflynn2554 9 жыл бұрын

Wouldn't meditation render all this moot or reinventing the.........? or will this advance meditation?

@phanesrekk8845 3 жыл бұрын

4:54 those percentages dont add up.. just sayin

@ShannonLooper 9 жыл бұрын

Now I want to see macro level results. :)

@Paddyllfixit 9 жыл бұрын

Although Dean's first two works, *The Conscious Universe* and *Entangled Minds* are interesting and important, I think you may find what you're looking for in his excellent latest, *Supernormal*

@Paddyllfixit 9 жыл бұрын

.......and he puts them up at the end. :-)

@TheHarmonicaMusician 9 жыл бұрын

I wish I can observe psychokinesis at the macro scale too, but unfortunately under the scientific standpoint there is no conclusive evidence for it. The best evidence we have for psychokinesis is at the microscopic scale such as influencing random outcomes. Although the mind is capable of affecting matter such as the roll of dice, it is important to keep in mind that it isn't practically significant and may do little to nothing in hurting casinos. Still, I find it fascinating how the mind can affect matter.

@Paddyllfixit 9 жыл бұрын

***** .......Nina Kulagina

@LaughingStock71 9 жыл бұрын

Shannon Looper Be careful what you wish for, it might come true! :)

@dennisdahl3 3 жыл бұрын

Is this experiment still available online to try?

@threehorsesxxx5759 3 жыл бұрын

If a robot can be conscious then it can perform esp also . Turns out

@oliverford5367 6 жыл бұрын

If consciousness is required, how did conscious beings like us evolve? If there was always a God-like consciousness observing everything, why are there quantum effects?

@Xirrious Жыл бұрын

Consciousness didn't evolve into existence, it is the fundamental fabric of existence. It is what the universe is made of. Humans are just the form it evolved into on earth. There is no god like Consciousness observing everything, we are the god like Consciousness ourselves observing things. We create this universe through our mind and perceptions of it. Without our consciousness, there is no universe to observe.

@WootMapler 5 жыл бұрын

You can use this to communicate with extraterrestrials and vice-versa

@thebestusername5852 3 жыл бұрын

His humor is so dry, and I love it 😂

@tinman0Z 9 жыл бұрын

I seem to be picking up on this

@njmikec 9 жыл бұрын

huh I thought there was no 'they'.

@alexandrumoise1511 8 жыл бұрын

man, people do love mumbo jumbo

@32bikkeltje 9 жыл бұрын

The funny thing is that despite all the blabla nobody knows what quantum mechanics actualy means....

@888thisthat 3 жыл бұрын

Except of course, for physicists who, you know, actually created, use, study and understand it. Somehow, all most ppl hear about QM is from charlatans like Radin, though.

@alexandrumoise1511 8 жыл бұрын

in the double slit, photons always behave like a wave. Even single photons interfere with themselves. This guy doesn't have his facts straight.

@toddaway 8 жыл бұрын

Single photons do not interfere with themselves when the slit they traveled through is known. That's the whole mystery.

@alexandrumoise1511 8 жыл бұрын

toddaway photons do, electrons don't well , actually, I think that it's photons up to a certain wavelength, as they do become increasingly wavelike as wavelength decreases

@herosmantle 7 жыл бұрын

The effect is not specific to photons. It even works with bucky balls!

@v.r.kildaire4063 7 жыл бұрын

but there proving it to be true

@alexandrumoise1511 7 жыл бұрын

I got it, every particle interferes with itself as long as it isn't being measured i.e. interaction with another quantum system