This music seems so off. Distracting

Well you said it right there at 4:40 that the church was at an all-time high right before Vatican 2 and then it completely fell off the charts right after. I understand that correlation does not prove causation however it's a pretty strong correlation.

Bring back the Latin Mass please, this video made me want to cry, God deserves so much more from His Children.

I would be really scared to changed any thing that was put there by God.

Thank you for this series. I was received into full communion with the Church six years ago and this was a helpful overview to situate the historical and theological context for understanding and receiving the Second Vatican Council. The historical footage is priceless.

The music is SO annoying!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"The calling of the Second Vatican Council was the worst mistake in history." ----Cardinal Guiseppe Siri

Hermeneutic of reform? That sounds like something Martin Luther would say.

The background music is lovely, but far too busy, especially when the experts are talking. Turn down the music and have a style that is less busy and more soothing.

it's always beautiful to hear about the history of the Catholic Church the that Jesus Christ established. not by men.

Ok, now this… this is epic. Thank you Cthaegon for showing this to me 🌝

Whilst at seminary, I studied Lumen gentium under a Dominican nun who had worked as a Canon Lawyer with John XXIII and Paul VI. Once you got a couple of shots of brandy into her she told some very interesting stories, especially about Paul VI.

At first we embraced it because we were immersed in believing our church would only embark on what would be GOOD and PROPER for the CHURCH.

I’m so excited to read the comments! All Catholics, it’s up to the laity to hold the episcopate to its true faith and calling! God bless us, all!

Nice documentation

The priest at the beginning is talking about addressing communism and yet the council never did address communism

"Genius" LOL There's barely anything left after this debacle.

Maybe Pope Pius 12th Was going to call the bishops in order to Consecrate Russia to The Immaculate Heart. Certainly not the Decimation of the Church

Watching this on my way to Traditional Latin Mass

Notice how the video also mentioned that the night the council begun there was a full moon! I mention this because in some circles a full moon is seen as bad things about to happen!

This question regarding an appreciation of the video clip should be raised after the viewer is done, viewing, and not before.

Great Vid

Maybe those who are positive on the “ethos” of the church must become verbal sponsors with influence, investigate “THE APPARITION & MESSAGE OF THE LADY OF LA SALETTE.” All wiseman through the ages agree there must be a purpose for our being..( or nothing matters )

A great blood red moon, well if that isn't an ominous sign of the things that were to come, and there came the Abomination of Desolation, but of course they thought all this change was such a good thing, and God did say, they would call evil good and good evil, these are the destroyers. Oh and no mention of the Protestants participating in the council, just that there were mainly apart from Cardinals and Bishops, Theologians present who worked mainly in the Vatican, in Rome, and from the Roman Curia, but no mention of these others. I wonder why, because they were Protestants perhaps, who were largely responsible for the creation of the new mass, and they were given pretty much free rein over it. If people bother to do the research all the evidence to support this can be found, it's not that hard to find out what really went on that is suppressed, to what they want us to believe. They were hell bent on not just changing the church but completely destroying it from within. They wanted to remove from it all that was distinctly Catholic, and now it is a shell of what it was in it's former glory. It's now nearly all gone, and it's Pope Francis who is to finish the job they had started and then there will be nothing left.

I showed this video to my students because I couldn't find a better one, but I am motivated to keep trying. I appreciate the effort, but the documentary was annoying because the background music which was distracting, and the theologians just having an esoteric theological chat at the end was simply boring, unless you are a total theology nerd. I would say at the least that this video is not for general Catholic public consumption. It started well with the details of the atmosphere that led to the Council, but then it fizzled.

“The rite of the [new] Mass is a bastard rite, the sacraments are bastard sacraments - we no longer know if they are sacraments which give grace or do not give grace… The priests coming out of the seminaries are bastard priests.” - Archbishop Lefebvre, Sermon, Lille (France), 29 August 1976. In M. Davies, Apologia pro Marcel Lefebvre (Dickinson TX: Angelus Press 1979) 1:262-3.

The background music in this is almost driving me mad, and I have to watch this... why do people assume that adding more is always adding more? Someone fix this...

Programme is almost completely ruined by the unnecessary and intrusive background music.

The music sounds like I’m on hold for a health insurance company

Any council after v2 ?

Prayerfully the Church will return to the advances in ministry awarded by the efforts of Vatican II...

“You shall know them by their fruits” (Mat 7:16)... Please show me ONE single positive result of this debacle of a “Council.”

Background music is sooooooo annoying

wonder how the frat boys are feeling now! falling down one brick at a time,, and very quickly i might add.

background music doesn't seem at all suited to the theme and is distracting.

My mother always took me to church every Sunday we more people to go to church and pray 🙏 for then but I need to pray 🙏 for are son that does drugs he needs God 🙏 in life please pray 🙏 for him Justin Alexander from Kathy Alexander victor Alexander Nicole Alexander and Marie Melissa Alexander

The intentions of the second Vatican Council were good and important, however some aspects were faulty and misinterpretations of text just cause a lot of problems for the local churches, from both the priests and the laity

I converted 7 years ago from protestant where I searched but found zip. Now I can see what our faith used to be and hang on to sacrements and thank God for a traditional priest. Communists and gays and masons have almost destroyed it. The Vat II began in the 1930's when Stalin planned it.

This background music drives me nuts

If John XXIII goal was to bring Unity amongst all the Christian churches then he failed miserably and utterly. We have more Splinter groups today than ever before and even within the church. So all it seemed to do was to fracture the church.

On the external with the atmosphere of initiation to change, it always causes anxiety, and as such the Vatican II in its beginnings was ridden on by the on going social trends that while THE INTENT TO UNIVERSALIZE THE CATHOLIC MASS TO EVERY OUTSKIRT COMMUNITY SAID IN OWN VERNACULAR OR SPEECH, it had also caused misunderstanding to mean even modernization of, first, the garb in nunnery. -- PRAYERS THAT ALL OF THE CONFUSION BE STRAIGHTENED OUT TO THE DELIGHT OF THE HUMAN AND SOCIAL SPIRIT THAT THE ESSENCE OF PREACHING AND SPREADING THE GOSPEL IN ALL CORNERS OF THE WORLD IN ONE'S COMMUNITY'S LANGUAGE WILL STAY FOREVER. FROM SUCH CLARIFICATION, MAY THE WHOLE WORLD CELEBRATE ITS AWAKENED SPIRIT THAT VATICAN II IS WELL EXPRESSED ITS TRUTH BY GROWING EVANGELISTS AROUND THE WORLD. PRAYERS ….GOD BLESS.

Bring back the pre-1955 Holy Week! That was the beginning of the end of the liturgy.

Does any single faithful Catholic believe that V2 was anything but straight out of the pits of hell.

The music is so aggravating. I can't hear hardly a word those men are saying. Talking heads.

The beginning of the heresy. "Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of Antichrist." Our Lady of La Salette.

Watching this a lifetime after VII, the happy music, the optimism and self congratulation is horrific when you consider the results. Where can you go if you want to be Catholic? In the fourth largest city in the US there are are only two churches that offer Latin Mass. Crossing the city to reach either is like going to another state. Pope John XXIII ripped the church apart and Pope Francis iis dancing in the debris.

I know it brought some needed Reforms in the church but it is unforgivable that this is when the Old latin Mass was done away with!!! I Have herd it said it is almost impossible to convince a priest nowadays to say a latin mass even 1-2 days a week ! Shamfull. We Need the renstatment of the Old Mass.

after vatican II, THE CATHOLIC CHUCH WEAKENED AND DWINDELED ....

Traditional or Modern

Very interesting, I didn't know that John XXXIII was such a wonderful person!

It really should have called Vatican II Electric boogaloo.

Note the masonic handshake at 16:57.

alas, since 1970 it has became a childish assembly with very ordinary music

Vatican II - A normal council? Hermeneutic of continuity or hermeneutic of inversion? The mind of the early Church was specific although her formulated doctrine was less specific. For that reason the formulated doctrine needed to be constantly specified to better articulate WHAT WAS ALREADY BELIEVED. Whereas the post-conciliar trend is to modify the mind of the Church to conform to a more generically formulated doctrine. Did Vatican II leave out or ignore some essential Catholic Doctrine? A consideration of Vatican II using the concepts of genus and species. Without getting into the historical background, inner workings and doctrinal details of the Vatican II documents and rather relying on what most Catholics know about it, the following analogy I think is most revealing: Aristotle says that the natural way of learning and coming to know things is from the generic to the more specific. Just as when we see something moving in the distance we first identify it as a body and then as it moves closer an animal and even closer a man and finally as this particular person; Socrates. Now it needs to be understood that there is a difference between our knowledge of a thing and the thing itself. Furthermore if someone were to give the definition of the species of a thing instead of giving the definition of the genus of that thing one would give a more precise and fuller account of the thing. In other words, the more specific our knowledge becomes of something the closer our knowledge resembles the thing, the truer our knowledge is. (Truer, in the sense of having more truth. Adeguatio res et intellectus) This is the natural way man comes to know. To try to move in the opposite direction is unnatural and against human nature. To try to forget what one already KNOWS about something in order to know it more generically is an act of violence against oneself. It would entail force that goes against one's own nature. Using an analogy this would be like a seasoned cavalier who has known horses his whole life attempting to not consider a horse anymore as a horse but rather as an unspecified animal. Now what is more generic and less specific is more universal. Whereas as what is more specific is more exclusive, in the sense that an essential difference is added to the genus in order to define the species. This sets it apart from other species. In the same way when one says the word animal it can apply to many things. Whereas, when one says man it excludes many things and applies to just one type of animal. Now, things that exist in reality ARE NOT generic they are specific. The Church founded by Our Lord is a real existing reality. It is something specific with its own essential elements and properties. A specific account of the Church includes more essential elements than a generic one. The Councils, pronouncements and doctrines throughout the ages became more and more specific. The Church's awareness of itself approached more and more the reality of its own being. It is impossible to move in the other direction. In other words it is impossible to move from a specific knowledge to a more general confused knowledge. A generic knowledge of anything is always more confused than a specific one, just as knowing something only in so far as it is an animal is more confused than knowing it specifically. Instead, our knowledge specifies as we gain acquaintance and experience of a thing. One may object that the Apostles or early Christians had a very clear and specific knowledge of the Church. This is true. However the Church's formulated doctrine was not as specific. Throughout the centuries this doctrine became better formulated and more specific. This was necessary especially to rule out heresy and error. A more generic knowledge on the other hand leaves out essential elements since it can never define as well and as close to reality as a specific account can. Take for instance the treasure of Dogmas the Church has and considering for instance the doctrine of Transubstantiation or the Immaculate Conception. These are very well defined truths of our faith. To try and forget about them and return to a more generic explanation would, at this point in time, leave out essential elements. One may ask, why say "at this point in time" would entail leaving out essential elements? Its necessary to say "at this point in time" since one could object and say that the early Church's catechising was not as formulated as it was post Council of Trent, yet we cannot say that the Church left out essential elements in its teaching at that time. This is true and that is the point. When heresies attacked the faith of the Church, as what happened with Luther's idea of the Real Presence during mass, the older formulation of what happens during the consecration was no longer specific enough. Therefore the Church better and more specifically defined this miracle using the concept of transubstantiation. Any teaching now on the Real Presence which left out the concept of transubstantiation would at this point in time leave out what has become essential elements. Unless we would pretend that the threat of heretical interpretations no longer persists and a generic account would immediately render a correct understanding. However we know this is not the case. Now, in order for Vatican II to be less divisive, open to non Catholics and ALSO IN ORDER FOR THERE TO BE CONSENSUS AMONGST THE COUNCIL FATHERS, THE COUNCIL HAD TO REVERSE THE NATURAL PROCEDURE AND PROCLAIM SOMETHING MORE GENERIC THAN PREVIOUS COUNCILS. Now, one could argue that the council taught no error. Entering into this debate is not easy and not for the most of us. However knowing that the council purposefully decided to be less specific and more generic is known by all of us. Can we say that a generic knowledge of a thing is deficient compared to a fuller specific knowledge of a thing? Trying to go against oneself and forget what one once knew or defined creates the impression that one must have been wrong once upon a time. Because why else would one try to forget or forget to mention what one once knew or defined? How many people do we know who have used Vatican II to look back and interpret older Councils? Anything more specific than the Council is frowned upon as superfluous and outdated. But does truth age? Never the less can we blame them for acquiring this habit when this is a natural consequence of artificially regressing and not progressing in knowledge? Of trying to be less specific and more generic? Furthermore, there is a prevalent assumption amongst "post conciliar" Catholics that Vatican II attempted to strip Catholicism of whatever is non essential. But, this leads to a contradiction since to hold this view would be to believe that a specific account is less essential than a generic account. This is the same as saying that the definition of man as rational animal is less essential than defining him as an animal. I would therefore like to ask: Why do we think Vatican II is supposed to be a type of update of Catholicism or a type of refocusing of the Church on what is really essential? Did the Council Fathers intentionally want to be less specific for the sake of truth or was this a consequence of trying to find consensus both internally and with the outside world? Was the Church's self awareness and identity diminished on account of this? Following the proverb Lex orandi lex credendi and its just as true corollary lex credendi lex orandi is it fair to say that an analogy can be drawn: as the new council (specific to generic) compares to the organic evolution of doctrine (generic to specific) so does the new mass compare to the organic evolution of the ancient mass? This leads to the next question: in trying to reverse the natural progression from generic to specific and trying to return to the more generic with the excuse of returning to the mode of expression of the early Church does the real danger exists of actually becoming more generic than the early Church itself? There is an essential difference here: the mind of the early Church was very specific although her formulated doctrine was less specific. For that reason the formulated doctrine needed to be constantly specified to better articulate WHAT WAS ALREADY BELIEVED. Whereas the post-conciliar trend is to modify the mind of the Church to conform to a more generically formulated doctrine.

search; the gnosis of karol wojtyla.

Because of thee John XXIII and your evil intended council souls were lost! Therefore be damned forever! You will not see ever the light, in hell you shall remain eternally.

Great doc, I can't wait to watch the second part. There is only a thing that bothered me, why is the music on the background so loud?! It makes difficult to understand what they are saying sometimes. Except that, is a very informative documentary.

wow theres so many catholics. I thought I was special.

As Judas betrayed Christ so did this council betray His Church.

We need a new pope please

💖

I have a miraculous metal from my grandmothers’ visit to Rome, Italy. It was blessed by Pope John 23rd. I’ve always worn it, after my grandmother passed.

The devils took covert control of affairs to deztroy everything from inside out

I'm still waiting for all the good fruits from Vatican 2

That's right everyone should start going to church every day then on Sunday to please 🙏 for are son Justin Alexander because he drugs he needs lots of help please pray 🙏 for him he is 31 please help him from Kathy Alexander victor Alexander Nicole Alexander and Marie Melissa Alexander wants him to get help because he started alot of problem with us we don't need that my husband Victor Alexander is 68 I am 64 I am his wife please and thank you very much amen

The Soul of the Christianity was destroyed by this aposthatic Council.

Very good and informative - Thank you for this

I’m here for re homework and ready to kms

And upon this rock, I will build my Church. The gates of hell will not prevail against it. The Devil and the Freemasons can try as much as they want, but it will all fail. The Catholic Church will always prevail as it is the Body of Christ. Whichever part of the Church does not produce good fruit, the Lord will prune it and produce the good fruit.

All the Vatican 2 catholics say it's too confusing, I don't understand it's confusing ! Or the mass is enough, no, it's not enough. You must have the true Catholic faith. There is nothing confusing about it !!! Pope Gregory the 16th 1831 let nothing of the truths that have been defined, it be lessened, nothing altered nothing added, but let them be preserved intact in the word and then meaning. Vatican Council of 1870 session 3 chapter 4 part 13 and 14 EX cathedra -- for the doctrine of the faith which God has revealed is put forward not as some philosophical Discovery capable of being perfected by human intelligence but as a Divine deposit committed to the spouse of Christ to be Faithfully protected and infallibly promulgated hence to that meaning of the sacred dogmas is ever to be maintained which has once been declared by holy mother church and there must never be any abandonment of this sense under the pretext or in the name of a more profound understanding. Pope Pius the 10th syllabus condemning the errors of the modernists 1907 article 62 : the proposition the chief articles of the Apostles Creed did not have the same sense for the Christians of the first stages as they have for the Christians of our time is hereby condemned as erroneous. St John of the Cross 1591 wherefore if there be revealed to us anything new or different we must in no way give consent to it not even though it were spoken by an Angel. St. Thomas Aquinas doctor of the church 1274 all those who deny one Article of Faith regardless of their reason are by that very fact excommunicated. Pope Eugene the fourth Council of Florence Session 8 1439 ex cathedra whoever Wills to be saved before all things it is necessary that he holds the Catholic faith unless a person keeps this Faith whole and undefiled without doubt He Shall Perish eternally. Popplio 13th 1896 the practice of the church has always been the same as is shown by the unanimous teaching of the fathers who were want to hold as outside Catholic communion and alien to the church whoever would recede in the least degree from any point of Doctrine proposed by her authoritative magisterium. Council Florence session 11 February 4th 1442 ex cathedra the Holy Roman Church condemns reproves anathematize has and declares to be outside the body of church which is the Catholic Church whoever holds opposing or contrary views. Popplio the 10th 5th lateran Council session 8th 1513 EX cathedra and since truth cannot conjure the truth we Define that every statement contrary to the enlightened truth of the faith is totally false and we strictly forbid teaching otherwise to be permitted we decree that all those who cling to erroneous statements of this time this sewing heresies which are wholly condemned should be avoided in every way and punished as detestable and odious Heretics and infidels who are undermining the Catholic faith. Saint Athanasius God's word is one and the same in the doors forever unchanged always the same Pope Pius the 9th, qui Pluribus I'm faith and religion November 9th 1846 paragraph 20 never cease to instruct all men in it never tolerating and letting pass anyting which could in the slightest degree defiled the purity of this faith. What the same great strength of Mind Foster and all men their Unity with the Catholic church outside of which there is no salvation Pope Saints sixtus 3 nothing new is to be allowed for nothing can be added to the old look for the faith of the elders and do not let our faith be disturbed by a mixture of new doctrines St Vincent of Lerins 445, all novelty in faith is ashore Mark of heresy Saint Paul Cried Out aloud again and again to all men to all times and to all places that if anyone announces a new doctrine let him be anathematized. If there is a change YOU ARE NOT TO SUPPORT IT OR embrace it IN ANY WAY !!! There is no confusion unless you're a heretic and belong to the vatican 2 fake church, there is no confusion for true Catholics, I'll say that again there is no confusion for the true Catholics the teachings of the church are simple and clear. Nothing is to be changed !!!!! Nothing !! If you disagree with this your excommunicated from the church you no longer are Catholic you no longer have a father in Heaven !!!

Thousands of bishops and theologians were wrong, but thank God that we on the internet know the truth better than them -_-

Hi! sa mga taga Carmel na andito to answer the hard questions given by our teacher.

The constant music is distracting.

search the gnosis of karol wojtyla

LOL !!! Refer to some experts like Dr Scott Hahn, a contemporary theologian and biblical scholar, former Presbyterian pastor but now a Catholic apologetics since 1986 He compares Vatican 1 from Vatican II

Prayer for the Restoration of the Roman Mass O Lord Jesus Christ, Eternal High Priest and Immaculate Lamb of God, slain for us and for many on the altar of Calvary, and continually offered to Thy Heavenly Father in the clean oblation of Thy Eucharistic Sacrifice: Grant, we beseech Thee, through the merits and prayers of Thy saints Gregory the Great, Thomas Aquinas and Pius the V, that the Holy Roman and Apostolic Mass, ratified, expounded and perpetuated by them respectively, may be rightly restored to the altars of Thy Church throughout the world; that once again this most awesome, majestic and perennial rite may offer infinite worship and homage to the Most Blessed Trinity; the fullest fruits and consolation and spiritual nourishment to the faithful; an impregnable defence and counterbalance against the rising tide of evil; and a sure termination of the anguish, fear, doubts, and profanations occasioned by its unsanctioned abandonment and replacement. O Holy Saints of the centuries, who sanctified and nourished your souls with the perennial Roman Mass, and Holy Martyrs who shed your blood for it, grant, we pray in desperation, that we will no longer be bereft of it, and that we will, as you, commit ourselves to the Mass at all costs and to the last breath of our lives. O Holy Virgin Mary, Mother of the Immaculate Eucharistic Victim, pray for us that we may bravely, prudently, diligently, and with sound doctrine and means pursue the rectification of the present encroachment on the Eucharist Sacrifice, and secure with thy powerful maternal aid the restoration of our Roman Catholic Mass and the Reign and Order of the Kingship of Jesus Christ thy son. Amen.

Who caused to fight and bifurcate as Jews and Christian?

16:49 cardinal TAGLE of Philippines the future pope if there is a chance

Akin to the Titanic hitting the iceberg.

(4:37) Is she okay?

All the destruction after this Council? You are blind leading more blind people

We must be stay in faith whom Jesus Christ established 2000 years ago please don't be rebellious stay stay in faith

So...it was a Cold War thing? Go America!

I thought the comments would be way worse and kinda rude

Please take out music!

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) - More than 1,000 children - and possible many more - were molested by hundreds of Roman Catholic priests in six Pennsylvania dioceses, while senior church officials took steps to cover it up, according to a landmark grand jury report released Tuesday. The grand jury said it believes the "real number" of abused children might be "in the thousands" since some records were lost and victims were afraid to come forward. The report said more than 300 clergy committed the abuse over a period of decades. Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro said the two-year probe found a systematic cover-up by senior church officials in Pennsylvania and at the Vatican. "The cover-up was sophisticated. And all the while, shockingly, church leadership kept records of the abuse and the cover-up. These documents, from the dioceses' own 'Secret Archives,' formed the backbone of this investigation," he said at a news conference in Harrisburg. Significantly, the report faulted Cardinal Donald Wuerl, the former longtime bishop of Pittsburgh who now leads the Washington archdiocese, for what it said was his part in the concealment of clergy sexual abuse. Wuerl defended himself, releasing a statement Tuesday that said he had "acted with diligence, with concern for the victims and to prevent future acts of abuse." The grand jury scrutinized abuse allegations in dioceses that minister to more than half the state's 3.2 million Catholics. Its report echoed the findings of many earlier church investigations around the country in its description of widespread sexual abuse by clergy and church officials' concealment of it. The panel concluded that a succession of Catholic bishops and other diocesan leaders tried to shield the church from bad publicity and financial liability by covering up abuse, failing to report accused clergy to police and discouraging victims from going to law enforcement. Yet the grand jury's work might not result in justice for Catholics who say they were molested as children. While the probe yielded charges against two clergymen - including a priest who has since pleaded guilty, and another who allegedly forced his accuser to say confession after each sex assault - the vast majority of priests already identified as perpetrators are either dead or are likely to avoid arrest because their alleged crimes are too old to prosecute under state law. The document comes at a time of renewed scrutiny and fresh scandal at the highest levels of the U.S. Catholic Church. Pope Francis stripped 88-year-old Cardinal Theodore McCarrick of his title and ordered him to a lifetime of prayer and penance amid allegations that McCarrick had for years sexually abused boys and had sexual misconduct with adult seminarians. Wuerl has come under harsh criticism over his response to the McCarrick scandal, with some commentators questioning his claims of surprise and ignorance over allegations that McCarrick molested and harassed young seminarians. Wuerl replaced McCarrick as Washington's archbishop after McCarrick retired in 2006. The Pennsylvania grand jury, convened by the state attorney general's office in 2016, heard from dozens of witnesses and reviewed more than a half-million pages of internal documents from the Allentown, Erie, Greensburg, Harrisburg, Pittsburgh and Scranton dioceses. Some current and former clergy named in the report went to court to prevent its release, arguing it violated their constitutional rights to reputation and due process of law. The state Supreme Court said the public had a right to see it, but ruled the names of priests and others who objected to the findings would be blacked out pending a September hearing on their claims. The identities of those clergy members remain under court seal. A couple of dioceses decided to strip the accused of their anonymity ahead of the report and released the names of clergy members who were accused of sexual misconduct. On Friday, the bishop of Pittsburgh's diocese said a few priests named in the report are still in ministry because the diocese determined allegations against them were unsubstantiated.

...is that all ..??

Who are those "Christians" outside of the Catholic Church of Christ? Who was Luther? How did Luther's "Reformation" come about? A German Doctor of theology explains the whole "miracle" of the Luther Revolution: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hseGmdx6y8-Xf2g.html

A prime example of the blind leading the gullible.

Someone really needs to remove the back music. Completely distracting and unnecessary much like Vatican 2🙄

There is no 'Protestant Church'. There is a Protestant Heresy that protests against the one Church - the Church founded by Jesus Christ - the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. There is ONE Church (Catholic). Everything else is Schism (Orthodox) and Heresy (Protestants).

Vatican 11 destroyed the Roman Catholic Church Tridentine 500 tradition when I was only a 13 year old alter boy but wise enough to see the damage happening around me!

The most significant religious event in the 20th century was the outpouring of the Holy Ghost on Azusa St in downtown Los Angeles. That was way more significant than this synod of the catholic cult.

V2 Modernists: united in disobedience to the deposit of faith of 2k years and who say that Jesus is no longer necessary for salvation. A.) Jorge Bergoglio and numerous bishops have shown they are not the kind, caring Vatican 2 they made themselves out to be but are collegial towards Germans who disobey the deposit of faith, Bergoglio smiles while bishops ignore church teaching on homosexuality, abortion, adultery, etc, while Bergoglio divides the church with his schismatic Pachamama idol blessings. B.) This is a false spirituality, one in which Bergoglio is on a quest to be rigid against rigidity, is collegial with James Martin types and when giving awards to pro-aborts, and towards Germans who disobey the deposit of faith. C.) All the while everyone else gets the Synodal Way while Bergoglio is hypocritically dictatorial with Traditionalists in that he said the bishops are to ensure that groups already celebrating the TLM "do not deny the validity and the legitimacy of the liturgical reform *dictated* by Vatican Council II and the Magisterium of the supreme pontiffs" while every conceivable Novus Ordo mass under the sun is allowed, with crazy antics such as hip hop music and worse during masses taking place. D.) The signatories to Vatican II refused to take an oath against modernism, but now demand allegiance to modernism (we can see its fruit above) - or else! Renewal allegiances at each mass? This isn't conversion through free will but through coercion. And Bergoglio does the finger wag now after allowing or being party to schism himself by bowing before and blessing the naked Pachamama idol when it was brought onto Sacred ground by schismatic idol worshippers. But no doubt schismatic, modernist heretics will continue to be hateful and uncollegial.

ok

VATICAN 2=COUNCIL OF APOSTACY!

❤

Very nice intro. The ideological comments from so many critiquing Vatican II suggests how far they are removed from the hearts and minds of the average lay person..and really how a-historical they are.

The background music is extremely irritating. I don't think I'll watch part two. This is my second time trying, tho. yup, still aggravating.

I got a sense of superiority- not in a good way - from the contributors- interesting nonetheless