No video

Episode 94 - AKG C1000 Possibly the most hated microphone ever?

  Рет қаралды 2,562

Sound, Lights and Video

Sound, Lights and Video

Күн бұрын

The C1000, universally hated, but in reality a pretty nice microphone. In the 90s they became a sort of joke, yet people carried on buying them. They even had jokes doing the rounds - "What are C1000s best for? - banging in nails" was the one I remember. Maybe the shape, and the fact so many schools and colleges doing Music Technology, the new cool music subject, seemed to use them for everything generated the dislike - but reviditing them reveals they're perfectly decent mics. Odder was that they could be converted into hyper-cardioids with the little black piece of plastic in the box - that most people lost almost immediately!

Пікірлер: 21
@redcabinacoustic-official
@redcabinacoustic-official 11 ай бұрын
That is the Mark IV, FYI
@rickrockzyootoob
@rickrockzyootoob 11 ай бұрын
I never understood the malice for this mic. Mine came in a set with my C4000B. It's bailed me out a few times with surprising results. My Blue Spark stopped working while recording an acoustic guitar in stereo, so on a whim, I pulled out the C1000S and used it on the fretboard side, and it ended up sounding great! I also used it on a violin, the bottom of a snare and a backing vocal, all with very usable results. And for hi hat, I swapped in that hypercardiod cartridge, and it really cut back on the bleed. And even on YOU, Paul, it didn't sound much different from your SM7B, except it gave your voice a much more controlled low end. PS -- you're really rocking those salmon trousers!!! 😊
@pauljohnson4590
@pauljohnson4590 11 ай бұрын
I know! I just cannot understand my long term prejudice!
@mrrgstuff
@mrrgstuff 11 ай бұрын
Interesting video. I know very little about mics, but wanted to improve the sound on my KZfaq videos, and decided to buy an AKG P170 to use as an overhead mic (seemed like a reasonable price point to stsrt at). I was planning on moving it around my workshop as needed, but then found very cheaply a C1000s. There are apparently 4 versions of this, the middle 2 are silver and one has an LED indicator. Mine is the silver LED version and I am just as happy with the sound from it as the P170. The body is certainly an odd shape though. I really need to 3D a mount for it. Apparently you can 3D print the plastic insert, though my original one is still there. Thanks for posting 😀 👍
@Yoda8945
@Yoda8945 8 ай бұрын
The C1000 was a really decent mic that was really bright. At the time in mid 80's I preferred the Shure SM81, but the battery power of the AKG was an advantage.
@dannyharvey8470
@dannyharvey8470 8 ай бұрын
my wife sings and loves this mic, I can't prise it off her! I have the Hypercardiod widget fitted. I have another two that I used for drum overheads and they worked fine, but then got a couple of Beyer M160's which worked well with the snare and wasn't so bright on the cymbals - the M160s just sounded more classic rock and worked with less eq!
@sl3102
@sl3102 8 ай бұрын
I have a couple of them (Austria made - haven't tried the new China ones, but I don't think sound quality has improved) for drum overheads, mostly because they're dirt cheap, and they work pretty good for gritty rock drums. I've tried them on acoustic slide guitar as a stereo pair and they get the job done. Absolutely terrible for singing though. All the eq and de-esser in the world couldn't get rid of the sibilance. Wouldn't recommend it for guitar cabs either. Like any mic it has its uses - you just have to find them.
@ProAudioIQ
@ProAudioIQ 4 ай бұрын
So bizarre how different people can experience such different things in the same industry. I’ve been a sound engineer since 1994 and this is the first time I’ve actually ever heard of anything negative (reputation or performance) surrounding the C1000s. It has always just been a great studio and/or live workhorse mic. Almost like a condenser equivalent of the sm57. I’ve actually owned one since 2002. Zero complaints. I still use it when the right need comes along.
@pauljohnson4590
@pauljohnson4590 4 ай бұрын
Yes - I'm very guilty of underrating this mic. The explosion of music tech in schools and colleges in the late 90s meant they were buying gear very quickly, and the C1000 was the cheapest and common condenser at the time. It got used for so many things and some were rather unsuited to its design. Not the mics fault, but the users. Having to listen to hundreds of rotten recordings all with the common feature - the C1000 biased me - plus, the forums at the time used to tell C1000 jokes. Like - what is the difference between a C1000 and a hammer? The C1000 is better at driving in nails.
@ProAudioIQ
@ProAudioIQ 4 ай бұрын
Yeah, that’s crazy. My first experience was actually pretty fantastic. The mic was about 8 feet from the source on stage in a loud environment in a live performance scenario and there was no feedback. Sort of blew my mind and I had to figure out what mic it was. The mic won’t create world peace but it has just been a great performer on literally anything I’ve put it on. But I’ve aways been intentional with how I’ve placed it/used it. To me it’s like an SM57 with more polar pattern and frequency choice and faster transient response. And like you mentioned, they even share the same hammer comparison 😁
@kw9172
@kw9172 8 ай бұрын
Here in Austria, the C1000 has been everywhere, and still is. They´re all over the used market, too. They never were hated, they were marketed as what they were - budget, reliable condenser mics with practical features for the time (phantom power on your 4-track tape deck? dream on!) and people got that.
@pauljohnson4590
@pauljohnson4590 8 ай бұрын
Yes. It took me 20 years to realise they were actually nice mics. Here, they launched just before the huge explosion in music technology in schools and colleges so at the price sold into them in huge numbers and maybe that was the cause. A mic for beginners that often sounded horrible just because it was used poorly?
@ExpandingSound
@ExpandingSound 6 ай бұрын
I don’t hate the c1000 at all I like it
@Sentientfx1
@Sentientfx1 2 ай бұрын
I like 'em. They sound nice and airy but not thin like A C451.
@Squirberus
@Squirberus 4 ай бұрын
This is a useful comparison, i've been a bit sensitive because I've seen all the hate and haven't been thrilled with my VO sound using a c-1000s. But I don't see a huge difference with the sm7b(the 'standard' but I'd probably go for a re320 or mv7, the simpler/cheaper sm7b). Seems I don't need to replace it. I noticed you speak a lot further from the mic than I do but still get a really good sound. Think that helps with stuff like mouth sounds and plosives? You seem to also have a very quiet recording enviroment though. I am like, inches from it when record. Is this a bad thing?
@pauljohnson4590
@pauljohnson4590 4 ай бұрын
Possibly but a foam windshield works pretty well. My space is petty dead. My distance sounds horrible in live rooms. I just hate the things being huge in the videos! Give yours a go.
@Squirberus
@Squirberus 4 ай бұрын
@@pauljohnson4590 thanks for the answer!
@kellymichael9567
@kellymichael9567 3 ай бұрын
From what I know. I have two of them they can seem to be' fizzy 'over drum cymbals. I can get a very good guitar amp sound with one of these and a Ribbon mike. ( this can be processed mid/side with the cardioid c1000 as the mid and the figure of 8 ribbon mic polarity flipped out of phase. I have heard sound engineers say wanna fry some bacon? Use the c1000. It is a metaphor for a bright mic! The capsule is apparently a really good one and there is a couple of mods that you can do. It involves changing a tiny capacitor and even cutting into the body of the mic. I actually know backing vocals as a group of singers can be done with the akg. I have found it very sensitive to placement. Even use it off axis. People get impatient with this mic! But use your creativity and explore what it can do.
@gabsriel
@gabsriel 14 күн бұрын
I vastly prefer this AKG to the Shure for video podcast...I hate the warmth of thr SM7b
@ScottGrammer
@ScottGrammer 9 ай бұрын
We had a pair of C1000's in the studio in the early 90's. The studio owner bought them because they were AKG's, and they were relatively inexpensive. I didn't care for them. The felt, looked, and sounded cheap. I rarely used them.
@pauljohnson4590
@pauljohnson4590 9 ай бұрын
That’s how I felt then too but now I’m not certain
The AKG c1000s - 1986 to present (2023)
12:46
Red Cabin Acoustic
Рет қаралды 4,8 М.
Studio Microphones you DON’T NEED (and some you do)!
12:19
Creative Sauce
Рет қаралды 107 М.
Yum 😋 cotton candy 🍭
00:18
Nadir Show
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Prank vs Prank #shorts
00:28
Mr DegrEE
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Blue Food VS Red Food Emoji Mukbang
00:33
MOOMOO STUDIO [무무 스튜디오]
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
The Giant sleep in the town 👹🛏️🏡
00:24
Construction Site
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН
Audiophiles - You're wasting your money!
16:28
Audio Masterclass
Рет қаралды 947 М.
Episode 137 - A fake Shure GLXD4 'Digital' Wireless Mic system with TWO mics!
13:19
Episode 134 - Warning New fake/counterfeit Chinese Microphones - Beta 58
9:29
Sound, Lights and Video
Рет қаралды 1,3 М.
Audio Demo of Teyun Q-26 Audio Interface Using a Mobile Phone
7:11
"I'm Not Antisemitic” Roger Waters vs Piers Morgan On Israel-Palestine & More
1:10:36
Piers Morgan Uncensored
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
If You Can't Answer These 6 Questions You Don't Have A Story - Glenn Gers
14:57
Do I Really Need a Shockmount? by Sweetwater
2:33
Sweetwater
Рет қаралды 99 М.
AKG C1000S - Detailed Review and Microphone Comparisons
16:48
Shure SM57 - The Only Microphone You'll Ever Need...
16:40
AudioHaze
Рет қаралды 289 М.
Yum 😋 cotton candy 🍭
00:18
Nadir Show
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН