Hello you savages. Watch the full episode with Eric here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/psWjqqWQsLmceKs.html! Get a Free Sample Pack of all LMNT Flavours with your first box at www.drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom

Eric has such a brilliant way of taking complex ideas and making them exponentially more confusing and vague

"An idiot admires complexity, a genius admires simplicity" Terry Davis

Eric is the only person who will talk so much and actually mean virtually nothing

The amount of effort this guy puts into saying absolutely nothing of any consequence is really impressive....

I think most of us have been in a business meeting with an "Eric". He talks and talks, and agrees then disagrees, he thinks he's smarter than everyone else and has the snarky sarcasm to prove it, and then he talks some more about things that seem to be vaguely relevant but are actually not, then everyone walks out of the meeting with absolutely nothing accomplished.

When ego limits possibility nothing can be learned.

“Eric, shall I put your coffee on the table?” Eric: “Can you even describe the forces between the particles that constitute a table? Or coffee? You are not qualified to ask me this question”.

Sorry Eric - in January 1968 at approximately 6:00 p.m. I (a young police officer - off duty), along with my neighbour (a reporter for a large newspaper) witnessed for over 20 minutes a massive triangular craft (about the size of a football stadium) that glided almost silently over our residential homes situated on the outskirts of a large Canadian city. It was not an aircraft. It stopped for periods of time, made right angle turns, and had three lights (red, yellowish and green). It moved southward across a barren field and hovered over major hydro power lines. Then this craft was joined by five other smaller craft. A few seconds later they accelerated away and completely disappeared. I wrote an official police report when I returned to duty. My neighbour's employer (the large newspaper company) would not allow him to write about what he witnessed. You can't explain away what we saw. Was it an alien craft? Quite possibly. Could it have been a secret caft of US or Russian origin? Possibly, but highly unlikely.

"There are organisations that you cannot Google"....what a chilling statement

These guys are geniuses in their own minds.

Just submitted my FOIA requests for Romanian manifolds and determinant line bundles! Wish me luck! 😂

Eric has such an entertaining way of demonstrating his narcism and dunning Kruger bias. What a great Ego!

Glad to see Eric humble himself on this subject. It was frustrating watching him dismiss this back in 2021.

Admitting you don't know is part of the path to discovery of truth. Thanks Eric for not pretending to know.

The bigger question is if Eric's hair is a wig

Such is the delivery that once my computer actually froze, it took me a while to notice.

Eric is tired of Neil deGrasse Tyson being the King of BS. He wants a piece of that action.

In 1973, when I was a little girl, my family and I had a close encounter with a craft ... this happened just after dusk and this object first appeared as a light in the distance that looked like an airplane. It then began moving around in a way that our known aircraft do not... it began moving faster and the word I would use to describe the way it moved is "mercurial". At one point it moved swiftly across the sky and then slowed down, came to a stop, then took off in the opposite direction. I was in the car with my parents and little sister. My dad, who was driving, took notice and began following it ... rather quickly, we became closer to it as it became closer to us. My dad pulled the car off of the road to sit and watch ... next thing we knew it was hovering over the top of our car ... it was making no sound, blowing no wind. As I experienced this, I was not thinking "UFO" (again, this was 1973 and I was just a little girl)... I was just wondering what it was. There is a very strange feeling that that one gets when one encounters something so anomalous - that it does not exist in one's known world. My little girl mind was trying to put a label on it ... "Well, it is hanging in the air but it is not a helicopter... because they make a lot of noise and blow a lot of wind." It hovered for a few minutes, at tree-top level, then, according to my mother, it took off at a 45 degree angle. I did not see it take off because, by that point, I was terrified and hiding in the back seat. I was scared. I have no idea what it was. It did seem like it moved in such a way as to purposely attract our attention. It seemed like it knew when we had spotted it and, from there, it seemed that it anticipated our responses. But I have no idea what it was. I guess the Occam's Razor explanation might be that it was an experimental, high-tech drone (human technology) that was being used to perform psychological experiments on folks in the 1970s... to see how they would respond to seeing unexpected, unexplainable (and potentially, frightening) aerial craft ???? There are so many ways to look at this phenomenon ... we need to be both rational and open-minded. Lest we have a new religion form from all of this... and I would not be shocked to find that this might have been part of its purpose. But I do not know! It's a mystery to me.

Something I've just noticed about Chris' interviews is that he is comfortable with the silence. That's the mark of a skillful interviewer. It takes balls to sit with the space like that.

Basically 99.999999% of us have absolutely no idea whats going on and the phenomena of ETs is so unimaginably complex our tiny minds just cant comprehend it .

Chris: "Why?" Eric: "What do you mean?" Brilliant.

I love listening to Eric on this subject. Everyone else either talks about what they think they know or what they strongly believe. He is basically just like "This whole thing is weird. I have no idea what's happening. But it's intriguing and I want to know more". Which is basically where I am with it.

I read about this in a book by Nick Cook, "The Hunt for Zero Piont" (2001). He was an investigative reporter from England that followed the trail back from the top secret Aurora project, to the stealth technology, and the 70s deep "Black Project" research into antigravity based on Nazi experiments of the 1940s. He interviewed ex-NASA employees, members of the military, airforce, German and Russian scientists, etc. Fascinating stuff. It really leaves you with the thought of how far they might of progressed in the last 20+ years. 👍🏼

He waffles alot about nothing

I have analyzed what Eric said in this clip using the technique described in Isaac Asimov's Foundation Series. I succeeded in eliminating meaningless statements, vague gibberish, useless qualifications-in short all the goo and dribble-and found there was nothing left. Everything canceled out. In this clip, Eric didn't say one damned thing.

to me, a genius is someone who takes complex ideas and makes it simple. Eric is not half as smart as he thinks he is

Eric is is a powerful breath of air…..air being necessary to exist….keep breathing friend…..we need millions more of him…

Bro said he spoke to 4 million people 😂😂

"Extraterrestrial Scapegoat" would be an awesome prog. metalcore band name, lol.

Answers a question with a question followed by a long ass pause

Why did it all look like you two were not talking in the same conversation. Felt like a montage lol

Eric’s dramatic pauses make me want to tear my hair out lol

One of the strangest guys on the podcast circuit. Incapable of making a succinct coherent point - he tries to hard to impress upon the audience how smart he is and gets lost in his own word salad.

Imagine a trampoline stretched over a bumpy landscape. That bumpy landscape, in the world of math, is called a Riemann manifold. It's like a curvy sheet that can bend and twist in different ways. Now, imagine bouncing a small ball on this trampoline. As the ball rolls around, it feels different forces depending on the bumps and dips it encounters. That's kind of like a determinant line bundle. It helps us track how these forces change as the ball moves across the bumpy Riemann manifold. So, to put it simply: * Riemann manifold: A bumpy, curved mathematical landscape. * Determinant line bundle: A way to track how things change on that bumpy landscape.

I think Eric has a combination of arrogance + ignorance. Because of course there is proof. They have admitted that they have recovered craft.

I love being a functional scientist watching a mathematical theorist using terms that have no real relevance to the subject like determinant line bundle and reimannian manifold in a dismissal of arguments like theories on the existence of sentient non human beings when they're simply non Euclidean or non linear geometric devices (tools for mathematicians). He seems to embody the adage "if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" only with mathematics priciples. I feel we should chain mathematicians to a basement and feed them the calculations we need solved. Letting them theorize practical dynamics just allows them to convolute any subject, in a really pompous kind of way.

Nothing like an interview with someone who says he knows nothing. 🙄

The more I learn The less I know Socrates

Ive never been convinced EW's desire to hear himself talk doesnt far outweigh his desire to actually get at the truth of things.

Witnessing two flying saucers in 1965 at a young age, I had a very natural instinct that they're not human. What they could do and where they did it was totally off the charts from what humans do with flying crafts that are made. Humans don't do test flights in flying saucers over neighborhood roads and towns as test or practice. You're in for the shock of your life, no way they're human.

So it looks like "Riemannian manifold" and "Determinate Line Bundle" are Differential Geometry jibber jabber likely used in this context in regards to Space Time and the bending of it. For those who cared not to wiki his odd fucking pretext to his monologue.

I used to care a lot. Now idgaf. Because even if they’re not hostile, they’re at minimum annoying little aholes at this point.

This guy never been outside 😂 he's the type of guy that knows everything about rocks but never threw one😂

Eric Weinstein just comes across as so arrogant it clouds his message for me.

I’d love to see a conversation between Diana Pasulka and Eric. She’s been in contact with everyone from the Vatican to numerous high level people within NASA, the CIA, and other governmental programs from the US and other similar programs in other countries who have told her and shown her quite a few startling things. She’s also met and had numerous conversations with some of the most compelling and credible experiencers out there. She comes at the subject from a very different angle and it would just be interesting to see what could come of a conversation between them. Numerous people have explained that a big part of the issue surrounding disclosure is that not only is the topic heavily compartmentalized, the protocols that have built up around the entire thing in all the different departments makes it all but impossible for anyone to say anything definitive. It’s a knot that needs undoing for sure.

Wait until Eric finally sees one himself, it changes you

Id love to see a conversation between Eric and Travis Taylor.

Best Weinstein Quote, "either the universe is traversable or it isn't and if it is then they are here." Agreed!! I've been saying this for years.

I think it's so weird that people still don't believe this story.

A Riemannian manifold is a mathematical concept used primarily in the fields of geometry and physics. It's a type of manifold equipped with a smooth inner product on the tangent space at each point that varies smoothly from point to point. This inner product is known as a Riemannian metric. To break it down: Manifold: At its core, a manifold is a space that might be curved but locally resembles Euclidean space (the flat space of classical geometry). This means that around every point, there's a neighborhood that looks like a chunk of ordinary n-dimensional space. This allows for the generalization of concepts like curves, surfaces, and volumes. Tangent Space: At each point on a manifold, you can imagine a tangent space. This is a vector space that consists of all the possible directions in which one can tangentially pass through that point. It's like looking at the manifold through a zoomed-in lens, where it appears flat, and you can define vectors in this flat space. Riemannian Metric: This is a smoothly varying positive-definite inner product on the tangent spaces. It allows for the measurement of lengths of curves, angles between vectors, and areas (or volumes) on the manifold. Essentially, it provides a way to do calculus on the manifold, enabling one to discuss concepts like distance, volume, curvature, and geometry in a generalized, curved space. Curvature: One of the most crucial aspects of Riemannian manifolds is their curvature, which can be understood through the Riemannian metric. The curvature is a measure of how much the manifold bends or deviates from being flat. It is a key concept in understanding the manifold's geometric properties and has profound implications in physics, particularly in the general theory of relativity, where the curvature of spacetime affects the motion of objects. In summary, a Riemannian manifold generalizes curved surfaces to higher dimensions and provides a framework for exploring the geometry and topology of these spaces. It's a foundational concept in modern geometry and theoretical physics, particularly in the study of gravitational fields, where spacetime is modeled as a Riemannian manifold.

I always get distracted with the thought of wanting to pop off his Lego hair and try other styles.

Dazzling themselves with their own brilliance

Anyone: Morning Eric!.... Eric: Say More!?

Why are the UFOs blurry. ALL THE TIME.

Talk about a master of "Pause for effect".

Love that ending! Pretty much the most profound statement ever made, and then BAM, you slap us with an ad...🤣

Pauses so long I keep thinking my phone is about to ring lol .. great convo tho 🙂

Get Bob Lazar to tell Mr. KNOW IT ALL a thing or 2!! LOL

Whats 1970s Document called he mentioned 6-8 min mark?

Here here. This NEEDS to be more talked about, and Chris needs more people on actually discussing it the whole episode

The only thing I am sure of is that the devil is in the details.

This guy reminds me of that Monty Python (Matching tie and handkerchief) sketch where at the end of the interview the interviewer says; Interviewer: “Sir Edwin, get stuffed”. Sir Edwin: “I’ve enjoyed it”.

A person that thinks they’re always the smartest person in the room is often wrong.

For the first 1/2 of the vid, I thought they were saying “David Koresh”

The answer you are looking for is that, there are MANY explanations for what we are seeing in regards to UFOs.

"If you dont know what a hoogblahboo is or a mongasgataaa. Then there's no way you can ask intelligent questions about alien visitation." Couldnt agree more.

What a long winded way to say, “Damn, they must be using different physics”

The lighting of this video is superb. Shout out to whoever filmed this.

Eric finally gets serious in the interview at minute 9. He was being very evasive before this.

best camera used on any podcast!!!!!!!

I don't think the guys operating those crafts care much about PhDs...😅

I used to read science fiction novels because I thought this world was so prosaic and boring, but now I just wake up every day and I’m in the strangest story of all time.

Eric - great to see your updated take. 👍

Gotta go get one of those placed drinks !

At the current and dire times, the gov acknowledging anything like this, is most certainly a distraction. It wouldn't matter if true or false, the crimes they have and are committing must be far more severe than what was previously known, for such a grand distraction.

Awesome Thanks for the podcasts.

Actually, it is interdimensional beings.

I met two aliens in 1984, a female on July 20, three months after a blond male who floated forward instead of walking like we do. Me, a friend and my 2 children were with me too. The Aliens from out there, would never harm us. They see us as family.❣Greetings from sweden

'A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma' comes to mind when I hear this guy.

If the time machine is ever invented its already here because it's a time machine

Unlike Eric, I have literally been with 500ft of a massive craft when it "popped" in. It didn't fly in. There was a extremely quick and big atmospheric event, and the craft literally popped out of it and flew away to the south. This was sub 500ft! Over a residential area on a cold crystal clean night. Craft had no lights, no sound, no air displacement etc. It was shaped like a manta ray and was at least 250ft tip to tip. Now what I think about the dimensional aspect. To many people think they "live" or are coming from another dimension. I don't think it's that. I think they have figured out how to isolate dimensions. We are bound to 3+1. Well if we where to figure how to remove one of more dimensions during travel, things get fast very quick. If you remove length, time doesn't matter. If you remove time, lentgh, width, depth, none of that matters, thing become instantaneous. How do we measure power? Time over distance. How do we speed that up? Add power! Somone or something has figured out how to get around what we know. And it may be a system that doesn't require much power to actually travel on. The craft I saw was insane in size, yet looked completely weightless. It didn't look high energy. It looked effortless.

My question: Do they start up when it's cold out?

There are elements in the periodic table we have yet to discover that will be able to do incredible things with space travel i bet

"physics is science fiction" i like the vibe round here

Would’ve liked to know what Eric thought of the Tic Tak and Australian School incident…

Look up 1986 Ufo case over Alaska. Japanese airliner 1628 seen by entire crew and followed on multiple ground radar. FAA supervisor John Callahan. Pilot made a drawing where 10 of his 747s could fit on the giant walnut shaped UFO that escorted 747 for at least 45 minutes.

Always extraordinarily interesting, truly interesting, whenever Professor Weinstein examines an issue.

You gotta respect a man that admits he can be wrong and is willing to venture a guess.

80 seconds before I said: "What the fuck kind of jargon is that"... a new record for watching Eric

I think we can agree EW says batshit crazy stuff, to the extent it even makes sense. Sometimes I wonder if this guy can even add numbers correctly.

Why is the video not on apple of spotify?

Lackatski said they breached the hull of nhi craft. I get what Eric is saying but he's making conjectures without all the necessary facts.

Say interdimentional space beings one more time 😂🤣😂🤙

*Protons do not collide. Neutrons collide 😊

Very well put. Thank you.

I am a knower, not a believer, of this strange topic. I can't tell you the name of what I experienced or where it came from, only that it is. I experienced it along with witnesses. It was amazing and it killed off that quick to scoff part of my ego. In an instant it made all the people who smirk at this subject (including myself) look really dumb, closed minded, and arrogant. Science can tell me I didn't experience this and it doesn't matter anymore because I saw and I know.

ET scapegoats. Good work, Chris. Girard would be so proud.👏😁

Some will never believe even if it lands on their lap!

I guess it goes back to the ancient people that could calculate eclipse’s could bamboozle the populace.