I have to commend the interviewer for letting the guest finish his thoughts. That's all too rare these days. 😎👍
@EscapedSapiensАй бұрын
Thanks for the kind words!
@jmoreno6094Ай бұрын
Kind of funny that the first answer, which was supposed to be an introductory question, took 17 minutes of speech. Not easy for the interviewer
@TroyYoung-hg8qdАй бұрын
I have listened to Waffleram many times.He has cleverly figured out something that he never fully explains .Is anyone else hoping he delivers an amazing treasure but cannot convey it . Am I always missing something 😢? If they are derivable ,please open up and derive them fully
@davidchavez8114 күн бұрын
He's a grifter, word salad Is his biggest asset.
@teenspirit12 күн бұрын
Wow I thought I was alone in this. He always appears in some sort of grift channel (HN, Reddit, YT), says important sounding words about his important sounding thoughts and then goes irrelevant for several months afterwards.
@minhsp3Ай бұрын
Too many words, what Stephen has to say is that for nonlinear chaotic systems, we cannot make predictions when the Lyapunov exponent is high
@brendawilliams8062Ай бұрын
Yeap, one half is still a pecan
@markrosenthal9108Ай бұрын
In other words, "The Butterfly Effect".
@andy_nvrmndАй бұрын
Too much order guarantees the emergence of chaos to balance it out
@quasarsupernova9643Ай бұрын
Its more than that. He says most laws of nature are irreducible. We are fixated only on the reducible slivers which is why there are so many unsolved questions. I totally disagree with this..
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
Did you not just disprove your claim by making a prediction?
@4D2M0TАй бұрын
His theory aligned with Donald Hoffman simulation theory, it was funny to watch wolfram do several U-Turns in their recent talk 😅
@dylanpaul7371Ай бұрын
I had the feeling that Donald Hoffman's theory was so fuzzy and premature that it could've aligned with Stephen's no matter what Stephen said
@4D2M0TАй бұрын
@@dylanpaul7371 it's certainly not without it's flaws, wich he is open about
@ericgraham8150Ай бұрын
One thing I think… is it… “feels” like Stephen’s theory goes a lot deeper and seems a lot more technical and has more ability to eventually have prediction power. Hoffmann s theory sounds a lot more… surface level and doesn’t have a lot of the technical underpinnings and ability to be applied. I think it’s important to remember that Stephen’s work has produced a lot of real world tools that scientists around the world use daily. Like Mathematica and wolfram alpha.
@dylanpaul7371Ай бұрын
@@ericgraham8150 I think Hoffman's is in its early stages and is thus under-developed compared to what Stephen has been working on. Time will tell where Hoffman's work takes him.
@ericgraham8150Ай бұрын
@@dylanpaul7371 that’s undeniably true. Wolfram has been workshopping His theories for many decades so yeah I can concede that Hofmanns work is definitely worth keeping an eye on to see where it goes!
@FXK23Ай бұрын
7:58 : ".....and it turns out this interplay between the computational irreducibility of underlying systems and our computational boundedness as observers of those systems, that seems to be the key thing that basically leads us to the laws of physics that we have". This statement confuses me too much, please explain!
@helicopter_trafficАй бұрын
first part: the world is really complicated (irreducible complex, aka cannot be simplified to a basic equation) second part: we are not capable of knowing everything. our knowledge, and our ability to study the world, is bounded. we are bounded in space, aka it’s really hard to forecast the weather on friday for an exoplanet around a distant star. we are bounded in time, aka it’s really hard to know what the weather was 10,000 fridays ago, or will be in 10,000 fridays. we are bounded in computational ability, it’s hard to simulate 10,000 clouds in a computer. and we are bounded in scale. our machines cannot see things smaller than atoms very well, we have a hard time measuring the largest galactic systems of space. third part: this interplay between “things are really complicated” and “thinking is hard” seems to explain why we’ve found physics the way we have. we started with Newton, which is the human scale. later came chemistry and astronomy, which pushed us into smaller/larger scales of time/space. then came nuclear physics and cosmology, even further in both directions. if we were the size of electrons, where time is effectively meaningless, particles pass through each other, there’s no friction, light, or sound, and everything is always moving, then we probably wouldn’t start with newton’s laws, which require things to stand still, bounce off each other, and move forward through time. in fact, newton’s laws of physics may never occur to us. and Einstein’s theory of relativity would be useless for us to understand the universe at an electron scale. steven may add that, at such a small scale, it’s possible we wouldn’t be able to program things as big as galaxies into our tiny computers. similarly, if each person was the size of a galaxy, we might not discover solar systems for a long time, like it took humans forever to discover the cell. and it would take even longer to discover the stars (or even planets!) orbiting inside them. creatures that large would experience time differently, since light/information travels very slowly. they would likely never need to know about chemistry, much less nuclear physics. steven may add that, at such a large scale, it’s possible they wouldn’t even be able to build a microscope powerful enough to see into the world of atoms and electrons. it’s sort of a venn diagram. “things that can be simplified to the point where we can understand them” in one circle. “models of the world we can build” in the other circle. where they overlap is the space where we can build laws of physics. hope that helps somewhat!
@muntee3314 күн бұрын
This video could make a great drinking game
@KaliFissure27 күн бұрын
Finding the right hypergraph for HERE. That's all I'm interested in. Total possibilities is one kind of infinity and manifestatable is another. One is a volume, and one is a slice. You helped me realize compactified time. Which creates minima and maxima. How do you evade conservation? How do you evade closure between maxima and minima?
@kx4532Ай бұрын
Let's build particle physics out of cellular automata!
@couldntfindafreename29 күн бұрын
That's what they are doing, but based on the completely generic substrate of hypergraphs. "Cellular automata happen to have too rigid of a register" to implement physics, quoting from Jonathan Gorard. A good video to dig deeper in the topic: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l9lzd6qEvuDbmKs.html
@mykrahmaan3408Ай бұрын
Is hypergraph a particular type of hype?
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
High dimensional hype.
@xqt39a20 күн бұрын
Examples of computational irreducibility abound: Chaos Theory, Navier Stokes equation and turbulence, fractals . Mathematically defined: Arbitrarily small changes in initial conditions of input of a predictive function create arbitrarily large differences results caused by non linearity and/or non differentiability of the functional definition. Who needs a ruliad whatever that is?
@kreynolds1123Ай бұрын
Is there a reason why pauli exclusion can not be extended with "no two fermions can be compressed to a volume that would be their event horizon"? If it is that a black hole made from two femions would be equlivent to two fermions existing in the same quantum state, and prohibited by quantum dynamics. Then maybe the event horizon is a mathmatical thing that isn't real and exist in our universe, as tachyons being mathmatical things with immaginary mass and don't exist in our universe.
@mykrahmaan34088 күн бұрын
"From outside blackholes look the same". How many has he inspected before concluding they look the same? And exactly where? In the lab or at home?
@GaryBernsteinАй бұрын
Why do the math laws need to come from anything? They are 1 of all possible sets of laws
@blijebijАй бұрын
Very interesting!
@bruceylwang24 күн бұрын
3000 years ago, one Chinese said, “Word is said, not always Word. Name is named, not always name.” Cells say, “We have no problem to understand any word. What exactly are scientists searching for? What exactly are you guys want for? “
@CurleyguitarsАй бұрын
Only 7 mins in. CIR sounds like nonlinearity, the source of chaotic time evolutions of surprisingly simple systems of coupled equations. You can't just "plug in 1000,000" and get the right answer here also. Looking forward to hearing how CIR is new and interesting.
@lucavalentinoАй бұрын
That's my same impression indeed. But I went back to listen to it again and I (maybe) understood that CIR is just about not reproducibility if jumps are made in the calculations whilst non linearity is non reproducibility because of uncertainty in initial conditions which lead to large deviations when running the calculation. Did I get it or am I wrong?
@tellesu24 күн бұрын
According to Wolfram's ideas particles moving through space follow a deterministic group behavior as far as the updates that are read as "movement" are concerned.
@lepidoptera933713 күн бұрын
According to nature there are no particles. ;-)
@RVeda-vh5on18 күн бұрын
'Computational irreducibility': "In general, the only way to know what a program will do is to run it. In general there is no shortcut". These are equivalent, to my mind - related to the long-proven impossibility of telling something about a program as simple as whether or not it will halt.. I've always considered the math theory of computation wonderful, abstract and mystical; still, I attended what must be considered to have been a mainstream course in it at Stanford in '74, which contained the initial assertion above. I.e., this was a mainstream thought at least a decade before Wolfram claims to have invented the idea. Likewise Cellular automata and their theory - long studied. Or the related idea that great complexity can emerge from simple rules (ahem... the PDEs of physics are such simple rules, albeit continuous rather than discrete (something I haven't heard Wolfram mentioning that he's noticed). Voila - complex universe). Or computational universality, another Math Th Comp basic idea Wolfram is obviously familiar with. Exactly how is that different from this 'ruliad' term he coins, as if from bad sciFi? Has he explained that somewhere? I really do like Wolfram and his ideas - a lot. But I constantly get the feeling he thinks he's discovering for the very first time (and with immense expected near-future impact) things that have long been known.
@lepidoptera933713 күн бұрын
You can't run a general program. Most of them won't terminate. ;-)
@muntee3314 күн бұрын
I believe the Penrose tiling, or something very similar, holds the cypher for decoding the reference frames of nature to the most discernible degree, after which our current philosophy and conceptual capacity is woefully i adequate for taking any further steps and will need to develop its capacity and complexity many orders of magnitude to make any meaningful progress in this direction
@lepidoptera933713 күн бұрын
You should start a church based on that religious belief. ;-)
@wwkk4964Ай бұрын
Thsnk you!
@EscapedSapiensАй бұрын
Welcome.
@markoszouganelis5755Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@dtarby2095Ай бұрын
If you stop believing that everything started from a single point it will then make sense.
@ericgraham8150Ай бұрын
What will make sense?
@titfos1970Ай бұрын
Excellent point dtarby2095.
@davidchung1697Ай бұрын
I had one question for Stephen Wolfram: is there a limit to how much spacetime can be curved due to the presence of mass? If this were so, there would be an upper limit on the "size" of the black hole (the apparent mass inferred via its gravitational effects), since any additional mass accretion would no longer be able to increase the gravity due to the black hole. I don't think we have found an upper limit to the size of black holes - not yet anyways.
@_SPKerАй бұрын
Excellent question, something that can genuinely lead to experimental observations that could even validate his theories.
@tellesu25 күн бұрын
Could be like approaching the speed of light. You approach the limit but there isn't enough mass in the universe to reach it.
@muntee3314 күн бұрын
18:42 FINALLY! Well done sir. 👏👏👏 I've been waiting and waiting and waiting. Now that you grasp the meaning of everything all at once, all the time, i know you will inevitably be led to understand that this thing we call the universe is the sweet spot in all of that spectrum that nature tries its hand at. Our existence in this reality isn't necessarily the product of intelligent design due to its being owing to that of perfection. It is the perfect sequence of all things that is revealed when all sequences are simultaneously tested. It is the revealing of the coin toss. 😏 It is that which is able to 'climb up to the very top of the rope' that' chance has thrown down' for him. Or more accurately, it is he who is able to climb up the rope which he previously threw down for himself.... The big bang is not the beginning of everything.... The heat death of the universe isn't the end. It is actually the other way around. *At these maxims the fractions can be considered close enough to immeasurable to be sensitive only unto itself. Where it also acts as a singular point in its own reference frame. Like an embryo that becomes fertilised and becomes a fully formed being... It grew inwards not outwards. You didn't grow from one cell like thst which is in a particular part of your body now and develop imto all the othrr cells as you assemble yourself cell by cell.... Also, the equal n opposite thing... Neh. This winning lottery ticket we call chance or intelligent design is not a perfect union of action n reaction. For that would dictate that the structure of reality is perfectly reflective, or balanced. Nature is a lazy simpleton with chronic OCD. It will always find the path of least resistance. And it wouldn't take long to become fixated on reducing the restrictions of density and eliminating mirrored pairs as rapidly as possible. This would inevitably lead to a situation where two opposits are secured whose existence underpins the entire plane of physical manifestation we call the universe... And it either decays into chaos, or it cascades down into larger and larger groups of opposition that come together and neutralise the other. Till there is an existence of a state of non-existence. Everything is within the node.... The only way some like Penrose tiling works is if the initial parameters are predetermined and the manner in which they may develop and proliferate are also predetermined and the structure splits amd develops inwards, and the sorce of this all? The immeasurable complexity of the fractal nature of the universe that has split more times than numbers can account 5 for. The end shapes the principles present at the start and the start is the sum total of the end. And gravity. Its a dipole... Just doesn't originate here on earth. Actually only one side is here at any one time.
@SteamPunkPhysicsАй бұрын
Space and time shouldn't be conjoined? Yeah, no kidding... Once again, famous people are now finally saying what I've been screaming from the rooftops for 20 years. 1:12:00 Particles as topological defects, eddies and black holes. Yes, exactly but you need to stop thinking GR is greater than fluid dynamics and instead accept that inviscid fluid dynamics is how we arrived at GR. You're just not aware of the history of MacCullagh's influence on GR through Mie and Hilbert. (and that EM was fluid dynamics from the start) There's no need to wait 100 years. I can explain exactly why and how particles are black holes and topological defects and point you to numerous papers in fluid dynamics that will show you the mechanics responsible for it. I didn't come up with it, 100 other scientists across a variety of fields have, but we're just overspecialized and compartmentalized too much to properly communicate. The issue you're running into with the concept is that there's a scale based perspective where a particulate-like substrate can be more like a crystalline structure or granular (mechanically gear-like) at one scale and a fluid at another. It's merely an issue of scale. ...well that and the superstitious fear of the word aether. Sorry if you just had to cross yourself upon reading that offensive word I just wrote.
@lepidoptera933713 күн бұрын
There are no particles in nature. There are only people who don't know physics. ;-)
@grant30445 күн бұрын
Quack quack quack. His sickness is relativity. I moved an apple, its a new apple. I moved an apple behind the curtain, in aggregate reality its both gone and not gone, but aggregate reality collapses to a consensus state with a infinitely limited degree of randomness when i look behind the curtain so that a nearly identical apple is instantiated in a nealy identical state. And the "randomness" or rather reality measured is the aggregate result of the currently possible dominating but still fighting against the currently unpossible. Thanks Shane for asking: his model is a hidden variable model, obfuscated through the exploration of all possibility spaces limited by the probability uncertainty baked into quantum mechanics. They accept hidden variables in their field as an aggregate feature of what they dont know. To get around it they grind out a probabilistic map through (magic numbers, magic formulas) quantum formulas to predict what will happen but within a range of possibilities: its a best guess framework with an error factor inverted to give the probability factor. Whose "pedictions" become less accurate as time / the algorithm updates because their lack of information is parameterized then factorized by time and thus baked into the algorith: resulting in the probability map of all plausibilities in their possibility space over time. They bake in the uncertainty range because without it, and with base Newtonian physics limited by the accuracy of our measurements, we have an atomic level of innaccuracy / error they need to account for. They have an idea on the scale or range of error but they just accept the notion that the universe jiggles atoms ever so slighty, draft up their fudge factor range, and say there's no need to understand why or how because it's impossibly incomprehensible due to the infinite complexity of reality. His hypergraph is a fancy aggregate representation of a possibily space, the strength or likelyhood of relationships & results in the space, between all factors considered. To be fair its a neat tool. But the metaphysical kosmological diefication of uncertainty, relativity, and subjectivity is a bit much. These guys just want your money, or rather your governments money. Dont trust speculations of anyone who believes you age slower the faster you are accelerating. Or that you are simultaniously dead and alive until observed. Not saying his information is analytically useless, just dont drink the koolaid. Their science is based on Einsteins theories: that are built on fudge factors, subjective assumptions about reality, and non-experiments i.e. thought experiments. To be fair the tool is useful for brute forcing posibility maps under know parameters and constraints; good for guessing and checking as he says.
@brendawilliams8062Ай бұрын
21:40 You are unaware of your personal Ruliad. It takes others to know more about yourself than you do your own self. 2 is a powerful statement
@niblick616Ай бұрын
What exactly is a personal ruliad?
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
Clever! 💯
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
@@niblick616Consciousness, which runs culture.
@niblick616Ай бұрын
@@JohnnyTwoFingers Is that what she is claiming?
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
@@niblick616 Consciousness running culture? Not that I know of, that is my claim.
@JustNow42Ай бұрын
I do not think Mr Wolfram explain what he is doing very well. Too fast, too confused, too eager, even Shane look confused
@hn6187Ай бұрын
These are the kind of conversations I wish I'd listened to as a teenager, an honest description about what math and science are rather than the rather shallow and somewhat disingenuous utilitarian sales pitch schools dish out.
@drbachimanchiАй бұрын
I am an endocrinologist from india enthusiast about fundamentalphysics ..i have been listening to Mr Wolfrum as i find his explanation for reality very logical...but this interview beats everything else .well done.please say hi and an endocrinologist from india is willto work for Mr wolfrum with out any pay 😊
@felixhex7 күн бұрын
Dude, ain't entropy the *third* law of thermodynamics, dafuq? Second is flow law and heat energy differential, third is entropy, give rise to the term information together. You mixed up the second and third law of thermodynamics, I guess it's okay, everyone kinda forgets the actual second law, as important for computer science it may be(graphs etc)
@ksscientistorrapper9919Ай бұрын
No lie… that was low key 🔥
@zack_120Ай бұрын
It's about the grand law of nature, focusing on the only concept of 'hype graph' would've been way more informative.
@Mike10fourАй бұрын
We are all philosophers prior to scientific verification and peer review.
@HalfassDIYАй бұрын
Great interview, thanks ! Just listened a second time, this might be the first theory of everything Ive heard that includes the Platonic Realm as an actual structural support. I like it !
@TroyYoung-hg8qdАй бұрын
Is the output to input Inflation ?
@NicholasWilliams-uk9xuАй бұрын
I want to see Shane ask more questions, like when he said 54:50, explore possibilities.
@EscapedSapiensАй бұрын
Noted.
@TroyYoung-hg8qdАй бұрын
Totally agree Shane has to keep him honest by expanding on information. I’d love to hear Stephen explain a timeline of his findings over 40 years ❤
@StarsMannyАй бұрын
The interviewer seems to have a nervous compulsion to keep looking down or to the left and then back to the camera.
@EscapedSapiensАй бұрын
That's pretty funny - I must have been checking the equipment, or the notes or something. I had to switch studios last minute to film this so who knows what fires I was putting out in the background. I seem to settle down with my compulsions after the first 15 minutes or so...
@JOHNSON-wn7rqАй бұрын
He's trying to say it's dynamic.
@ashmeadali12 күн бұрын
" ECK is totality of all awareness." _The Shariyat-Ki-SUGMAD_ (Way of the Eternal). Experiment to expand awareness/alter personal frequency: Sing *HU* daily. Search how to sing *HU* . A simple, safe sonic tuning fork. "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."-Nikola Tesla. Skip "think" and do experiment. Keep It Simple Soul.
@dbebermanАй бұрын
loved Wolfram's book "A New Kind Of Science"
@StineWinsАй бұрын
Is a ruliad some kind of number wheel?
@xqt39a20 күн бұрын
Kamala Harris, our next president, has recently been theorizing on the passage of time ..has she been talking to Wolfram I wonder?
@RealQinnMalloryu4Ай бұрын
Stephenwolfram is avery brilliant saipan on escape sapian only
@AspartameBoyАй бұрын
You did not invent Turing’s Theorem 🤣
@krzysztofwos1856Ай бұрын
The fact that LLMs make the same kind of models that brains do is non-obvious, but it's surprisingly simple to explain. It's a consequence of the Free Energy Principle. I highly recommend Fields et al. Free Energy Principle for generic quantum systems. It shows that two quantum systems interacting through an N-qubit quantum channel can be considered Bayesian observers making models of each other. The FEP is a scale-free, background-free phenomenon. It applies to everything that exists. It does not say how observers form the models, but it can show that necessarily they can be seen as doing so. So, it's a bit of a weird answer, but ChatGPT forms models that are the kind of models we form because it cannot not to. The main innovation behind ChatGPT, Transformers, provided an efficient learning architecture allowing parallelization of training and thus efficient use of GPUs and web data.
@coder-x7440Ай бұрын
I was surprised to see this in a comment section. Well done on possessing such a depth of knowledge. You must be on a long journey on the path to what this existence is all about. Good luck on your adventure. Few will get as far as you have already.
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
I wonder if your guesses are right. 🤔
@thePlumАй бұрын
Please have ERIC WEINSTEIN on Escaped Sapiens (which is becoming my favorite podcast) 🔹🔹
@EscapedSapiensАй бұрын
Thanks for the kind words and thanks for the suggestion. I might eventually invite Eric on - it will need to be some time down the line though, as I already have quite a few other great physicists/mathematicians lined up :). Thanks for listening!
@robbie_Ай бұрын
Don't be silly.
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
@18:45 Stephen overlooks that not all things follow all rules all the time? And also that *perception of* what is going on is another way around "rules". Materialism is a fundamentally flawed perspective to figure out this problem.
@sunnyinvladivostokАй бұрын
> follow all rules all the time time doesn't exist at this point yet. the perception of time is something that emerges over successive application of the rules.
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
@@sunnyinvladivostok In constrained, disciplined environments it certainly exists...and pays dividends!
@NicholasWilliams-kd3ebАй бұрын
Super fluid convection and conduction may be the unifying theory, it's a medium that allows anything to form, as long as there is enough convection energy to drive evolution towards complex energy state arrangements.
@RobinCheungАй бұрын
I wonder if it is made necessary because you can't be definitive about your calculation being a representation to the true underlying steps and if it contains within it the uncertainty that your model may not be precisely equivalent to what you think you're modeling and not simply coincidentally matches what empirical methods of inquiry were satisfied and stopped quantifying deviation as a net expected value not accountable as a random variable. So in other words, hypothetico-deductive methods being at their essence, arbitrary in nature with no driver to minimize that arbitrariness, and worse, it seems so many researchers consider reductionist approaches as so much a knee jerk that Michael Levin even universally skips the all important step of allowing research design to flow from the ontological justifications given a predetermined most appropriate epistemological stance--but instead he emphatically jumps to "perturb the system," which is tantamount to "endorsement of blindly applying reductionist methods to complex systems that all but guarantee your answer cannot be correct but also even worse, that you think you even should get an answer that had any validity to model the actual system. You wouldn't use stoichiometric calculations to predict mood or anything even beyond the macromolecular domain because you know that steric factors are orders of magnitude greater than electrostatic interactions and it's not that domains with predominant charge or whatever isn't valid at that abstraction, but it is so overwhelmed and made irrelevant by each other of complexity being mediated by different mechanisms entirely. But this "presumption to the applicability of reductionist hypothetico-deductive methods without having let it flow from a syllogistic examination of what you want to know, how that exists within the relevant episteme: scientific method that will bring about its own need to be superceded. We're starting to look to science with a misapprehension of the purpose of science in the first place: by its very definition, scientific method cannot aim as a goal to arrive at "correct"; it's is only a framework that is premised on its being a consistent framework that can orient your inquiries towards hopefully an incrementally increasingly correct direction, but in order to arrive at actual correctness, you are always going to need more than once syllogistic step, so if you did happen to arrive at correct, it's either the end of times or if it is correct, then it was accidentally discovered and not scientific.
@montfort9581Ай бұрын
Unfortunately I think you are basically correct. I had a look at your channel, you seem to be a talented guy, I like the main graphic, where does that come from?
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
How did you determine all of this to be true? Or did you?
@montfort9581Ай бұрын
@@JohnnyTwoFingers For what it's worth I don’t think I did “determine of it is to be true”. I said that I thought it was “basically correct”, which is rather different really.
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
@@montfort9581 Ah crap, cuz that would be some serious power!!
@montfort9581Ай бұрын
@@JohnnyTwoFingers I see now that I wasn't fully coherent in my reply -- but then neither is Wolfram half the time either...
@AspartameBoyАй бұрын
Turing’s theorem.. duh
@user-fx5uo7uz7pАй бұрын
Wild
@michaelb7498Ай бұрын
I fear this genuis of a man is lost in his research, skewing his data. He goes on record claiming that his theory is working for the theory of everything. U can see the excitement in his eyes. Hopefully he has the wherewithal to balance himself back out. The esoterics can be dangerous
@ck58npj72Ай бұрын
Makes himself feel smart I suppose...
@TheRadischenАй бұрын
Projection eh?
@pacanosiu3 күн бұрын
@pappaflammyboi5799Ай бұрын
A lot of yapping and tongue wagging by Wolfram, but nothing really explained. I understand chaos and probability theories with a mixture of the laws of physics but beyond that, this computational irreducibility is gobbledygook.
@tellesu24 күн бұрын
It's ok to not understand things buddy. That doesn't make them nonsense.
@pappaflammyboi579924 күн бұрын
@@tellesu Do tell smartypants...
@theomnisthour6400Ай бұрын
What better rules than the ten commandments?
@niblick616Ай бұрын
What version?
@theomnisthour6400Ай бұрын
@@niblick616 there is only one, contrary to popular fiction
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
Scientology has a sophisticated system. Taoism is superior imho.
@theomnisthour6400Ай бұрын
@@JohnnyTwoFingers bullshit. Prove it. You just like the moral ambiguity they provide
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
@@theomnisthour6400 Haha, oh the irony.
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
@16:45 Stephen gets lost in language ("cannot *solve* society"). I'm surprised he makes such fundamental errors!
@kricketflyd111Ай бұрын
This computational irreducibility makes me think of the Bible and our geometric spiritual growth, where we comprehend over time. 😮
@niblick616Ай бұрын
The bible is a book of lies and fiction and blood lust! Have you ever read any version of it from cover to cover?
@niblick616Ай бұрын
1/ The 'bible' is a fictional book of nonsense. 2/ What is 'geometrical spiritual growth' other than some absurd word salad?
@wtfatc4556Ай бұрын
Religions capture something important, related to reality in a non objective way... Yet to this day, science can only point out more and more unknowns
@niblick616Ай бұрын
@@wtfatc4556 You forgot to provide a single example of what you are claiming. Please provide just five valid and verified examples of what you are talking about?
@OliverBridgeАй бұрын
By Jove! I think he’s cracked it!
@matthorn611812 күн бұрын
Good example of Smart going Overboard. Waste
@mykrahmaan3408Ай бұрын
46.05: atoms of space. Are there protons, electrons, neutrons, quarks, leptons and bosons of space too?
@AirSandFireАй бұрын
No
@mykrahmaan3408Ай бұрын
@@AirSandFire So, not different from the FIELDS without leaves, flowers or fruits.
@advaitrahasyaАй бұрын
Sounds like a promising mathematical model. Let's see if the gold standard of better data-fitting can get other physicsts to take a look… And some implications described are remarkable, given the blinding paradigm. Indeed, a BH should have a surface over a "hole punched in it" and topology is key to fixing the threefoldly inverted paradigm which blinds physicsts. Different mathematical models are still just mathematical models - not understandings of mechanism. And the current paradigm underlying them all is as invisible to physicsts as was the Geocentricism of dark-ages astronomers. All these MMs are great, as long as one remembers Newton's "hypotheses non fingo" honesty. Some, of course, always knew that Earth isn't in the middle, no matter that interpreting epicycles "proved" that planets were embedded in Crystal Spheres. Likewise, some of us have always known the simple mechanism by which all phenomena appear. Physicsts do data-fitting, and understand the mathematics. Listen to physicsts if you want to know exactly (or even only the probabilities of) how much, where and when. Listen to those with an understanding of mechanism if you want to know the why and the how of things, and (eventually) come up with better Mathematical Models. Note the progress made by the generation of physicsts who's reading list extended eastward. That progress came from having their thinking loosened up a bit. None were trained in the basics necessary to understanding what they were reading. When understanding of the mechanism of the fundamental finally seeps through the firewalls of the Physics echo chamber, it will be a description of the simplicity from which complexities emerge … and as long as interpretations and models get more complex, the further physicsts are getting lost in mathematics.
@niblick616Ай бұрын
Prove that any of that word salad is true!
@advaitrahasyaАй бұрын
@@niblick616 Out here, the baboons throw actual shit. Congratulations on having evolved far enough to do that with words 😉
@advaitrahasyaАй бұрын
@@niblick616 your estimation of it as worth insult, reveals your mental capacity. Good luck with that, poor fellow.
@niblick616Ай бұрын
@@advaitrahasya 1/ It is not an insult to tell the truth about something. Sorry. 2/ I notice that you failed to show that anything I pointed out is wrong in any way. Has it predicted anything that is novel? You didn't say. He started out trying to find one rule but appears to now be claiming that all possible rules are required. 3/ Thank you for making my point by resorting to personal abuse rather than advancing any rational arguments.
@advaitrahasyaАй бұрын
@@niblick616 now, that's a word salad :)
@stephen1475Ай бұрын
I don't think you can construct a real particle from an infinite sum of quantum field fluctuations because of the computational irreducibility of the goldbach conjecture.
@niblick616Ай бұрын
How does that work?
@rodmarker20716 күн бұрын
3 Body problem .... too many egotists
@6Diego1Diego9Ай бұрын
Steve has really been pushing this scheme all over the Internet without being able to submit definitions or proof. It sounds cool and all but c'mon.
@EscapedSapiensАй бұрын
Hi Diego, Going through his derivations of GR, QM, and statistical mechanics in more detail is definitely necessary. I tried a bit to pry open what the derivation of QM looks like at around 54:40, but a full account would really need a second interview. My impression is that they have fragments of a theory and they are in the process of tying all the pieces together. Its quite ambitious. I need to see/read more before I am convinced of the approach, but I don't think the ideas should be discounted for being incomplete or alternative. Even if they turn out not to work, our best models might one day take bits and pieces from the attempt. In particular, it doesn't seem crazy to think that the ideas of 'computational irreducibility' and 'computational boundedness' might have something interesting to say about what a measurement is and who an observer is in QM. An emergent spacetime with particles being described by topological defects is also not so wildly outside the mainstream. Perhaps if this video gets enough interest I'll be able to convince Stephen to come back on to go through some of the details of the derivations in more detail. Thanks for listening.
@NightmareCourtPicturesАй бұрын
@@EscapedSapiens Hello. if your interested, Gorard has a 3 part lecture online where he goes through the derivations (Wolfram Physics 1 : Basic Formalism, Causal Invariance and Special Relativity) Another good set of videos to watch is wolframs NKS series where he reads the book. Here it’s clearly defined what irreducibility is, and experimental evidence for it (the whole book is basically a proof by exhaustion, as his thing is to just run classes of rules) and computational equivalence which form the basis of the work in the physics model. IMO I think people do the work backwards. Got to go from NKS -> wolfram physics model, since the wolfram model is a consequence of the work in NKS being true. Cheers, and thanks for the interview!
@EscapedSapiensАй бұрын
Hi NCP, thanks - yes I've been meaning to go more closely through Gorard's GR and QM videos now that my interview with Stephen has been filmed (the ones on 'the last theory' from about 9 months ago...). It's a bit of a balancing act when I do research for these interviews, because I want to know enough about a subject to ask good questions, but not so much that the conversation/my curiosity isn't genuine. Thanks for listening! :)
@niblick616Ай бұрын
@@EscapedSapiens Until he submits his work for peer review and makes some novel predictions, which are then confirmed, his thoughts will remain just a curiosity. Verbal arm-waving means nothing.
@niblick616Ай бұрын
@@NightmareCourtPictures 1/ Where exactly is the 'experimental evidence' you mention? 2/ What exactly does that supposed 'experimental evidence' consist of?
@duodecimaldivision783Ай бұрын
The math everyone is looking for is in base twelve.
@NicholasWilliams-kd3ebАй бұрын
Non-warpable 3d space and linear progressing time is fundamental, the curvatures in perceived spacetime are displacements of motion flux competing kinetically for this fundamental space (energy density warps the vacuum, and the vacuum has a degree of permittivity and permeability which gives this fake "space" like material a warpable space time dilation factor, stress energy contraction and curvature) the general relativistic space is not a real space, but a competing quantity of motion flux.
@DJcrotsАй бұрын
Great guest. Very enjoyable to listen to. But please... what is the point of the other guys clearly ignorant face poping up every few minutes? No offence, but i never seen anything like this before. He doesn't say anything not does he apear to have any comprehension what so ever about anything being said. The only impact of his unbelievably blank stare is brightening up the screen on and off for absolutely no apparent reason...
@DJcrotsАй бұрын
My apologies.. turns out after doezens of times his face pops out he even tried to contribute something to the conversation... i gues it made more sence when he was just a brightness annoyance 😂
@theomnisthour6400Ай бұрын
Oh dear. Being smarter than the system is a Schroedingers sin
@danielpaulson8838Ай бұрын
Follow rules? It’s called cause and effect. This is loquacious verbosity. Whew. I’m glad we have Sean Carrol and Brian Green available.
@andy_nvrmndАй бұрын
"Theory of nothing" sounds pretty close to "Theory of everything"
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
There is causation between your rouliad and your hyperuliad because it is a strange loop or a strange feedback loop. Our universe is just a particle or a singularity in the next couple sets of higher orders of magnitude in existence just as the particles in our body and everything else are a universe and so are singularities. This is the way the universe grows and multiplies as well as disappears and evaporates. Somewhere in one of the particles in your body there is a living being on a planet much like this thinking that it is not causal to the one that it is part of named Wolfram. Now imagine what would happen if they weren't then we would not have any particles.
@niblick616Ай бұрын
What does higher magnitude of order mean?
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@niblick616 so the universe is always expanding and it will eternally there is no contraction of space as matter is the opposite forest in the equation that they are searching for. Matter is being eternally squashed into singularities in black holes and other less dense structures temporarily although they will all end up in Singularity that's another reason they are a potential infinity. And I hope you understand what that means now. It's a common turn used in mathematics that's not something that I just made up in fact nothing that I speak of is I just have very poor way of describing it and I'm not very articulate. I tried to cram too much information on one comment is the problem. So while matter is Contracting in a singularities space is eternally expanding and once those singularities are all outside of causal continuity meaning the light from them will be causally disconnected from everything as it can never reach any other point or thing in space because it would be moving away from it faster than the speed it can travel due to the accelerating expansion of the universe. That's why the observable universe is what it is because the further you go the faster it's expanding until it hits the edge of light and then basically disappears from our telescope and in fact it really literally disappears from existence and is recycled back into the middle the not the center middle the middle of everything meaning it gets recycled back into everywhere and it is what is causing the expansion and it's called dark energy. This boundary is a relative thing because depending on where you're at the boundary will be a different distance away from you because every one of us is literally the center of our own relative universe. The entire cycle from Singularity to evaporation is one revolution in the Universal hierarchy of size and number and causal relationships as the universe expands it divides itself into as many Planck units as possible that can be fit into the area covered by space and each one of these will one day be capable of supporting matter and even singularities the larger sizes like our black holes. Are there all particles are singularities they're just from different scales kind of like how a Stellar Mass black hole is infinitely smaller not literally but millions and millions of times smaller than a supermassive black hole and the largest supermassive black holes are billions of times larger than our sun. That's a whole different skill in the hierarchy of size. Because of the interlocking nature of reality there's halfway points and other place markers along the way that we perceive as particles Stellar black holes and supermassive black holes as well as other things and this is the microscopic macro and Cosmic scales. After the universe has reached heat death and expanded so far all things are constantly disconnected when the singularities in the black holes disappear because of the Hawking radiation and all movement ceases that means that space will disappear as well as they are codependent upon each other. But this will be for the shortest instant of time recordable which is basically a duration list moment. Just like the conscious present moment even though we tried to quantize it and there's even people who say they can measure it it literally doesn't have any duration because it's always moving just like you can't determine the speed of a particle when it's moving and it's very very simple why. Because you have to stop it to measure the speed. Once you do that it's not moving anymore anyone who said quantum physics is hard to understand it's just kind of dense I think. Now all that information is basically like what Mr wolfram's talking about in his ruliad and what we were first discussing about how computation alone isn't enough for quaglia and Consciousness and all other non- computable. You can think of it as a giant alphabet. When information becomes aware of itself because nothing is impossible because of the information so that means that it must be infinite since it's only thing there is That's why nothing is always turning into infinity and back again as I described and this is what gives electromagnetism its pattern and polarities, but when the information first starts differentiating it's a homogeneous perfectly Square and motionless lattice of crystalline pattern and structure of all the particles and energy in the universe in total and complete heat death and thermal equilibrium and no movement as that's what nothingness is but once it starts differentiating the thing that I call an alphabet needs a language for it to be written down somewhere . This is consciousness and mind because even though our alphabet Terry's information it cannot carry any significant meaning without words in a language that it is a part of and helps build. But we're not done yet because there's three different kinds of energy fundamental to the universe and there's kinetic energy gravity and then thermal energy which is the energy of Life Light biology and chemistry and Heat and that my friend is what takes the letters and then takes the words and then add a story story to it because without a story the information would still be basically meaningless it would be disjointed and unconnected words that had no meaning outside of their own self and this idea of letters creating words so they could be made into a language and then written down at the story is completely mirrored in the prime numbers and the golden ratio in Fibonacci Sequence as the prime numbers are the building blocks of all member every number there is is a factor of a prime number and they are basically like the leaves on the tree and the tree they are growing on is the Fibonacci spiral the golden ratio which is the relative side that time and space are providing for continuation continuity and everything that is a Continuum and not discreet while the prime numbers represent everything numbered Quantum and discreet and furthermore these both represent Chaos on one hand and order on the other and where they come together it's called probability. When this happens the the universe has for all intents and purposes grown one infinite size of existence in the hierarchy as it not only expands it ages and it multiplies but it doesn't just do this because it shrinks in the opposite polarity and multiplies further and since this is infinity we're talking about there's an infinite number of other operations of infinity that we can't even fathom that happens but for our universe there's only a few select that matter and that's the ones for time matter and all if our physical constants. So after a revolution even though it's still an Infiniti that's exactly the same as the last one for all intents and purposes it literally is bigger has a different cardinality even though that is something that's completely impossible if you're talking about any other type of Infinity but this is kind of like how when you go from the natural numbers to the real numbers all I said in decimals can it appear in between each point infinitely so it's uncountable that is akin to the way this universe gets larger in size as it expands and multiplies in comparison to what it was because it is expanding infinitely in all directions of infinity so it's not only just expanding in area is expanding in number of as well.
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@niblick616 the most mind-boggling part of this is the fact that the largest thing imaginable is literally the smallest thing imaginable because it is a strange Loop Purity strange Loop is a structure where you go out one side and come back in the bottom like on a game of Pac-man and that is literally how our universe functions although it doesn't do this directly it does it through the chain of causal Infiniti as I was speaking of which is something completely outside of this universe and we don't even need to speculate on what it consists of cuz we'll never know. We just need to know its value and how it relates to what we do know and thanks to light having a finite speed because infinite velocity is impossible everywhere we know many things about it that could show exactly why everything in our universe is what it is perfectly. I mean exactly on a one-to-one basis not in some kind of permissible inexactness where you can be off by thousands and even millions in the units of value that you were talking of but they say that as long as it's close to an acceptable margin of error then it's still valid. My way of doing things gets rid of all that it's matched up one the one with either a yes or no logic. I have literally figured out a new way of calculating with infinity so we can deal with some of the infinite values that we get in physics that they try to normalize other ways. I'm here to show everyone that there's no need to read normalize anything that the infinities are perfectly valid in natural they just can't exist physically except as infinite density are singularities so when in infinite Multiplicity in number in an infinite object in area and volume needs to manifest physically the differentiate itself from everything else then it'll have to take turns doing it because all things will eventually be differentiated if the universe is continuously expanding and multiplying while at the same time Contracting in its opposite polarity in recycling the leftover energy both ways back into it. It's literally a feedback loop but it's more of a spiral because it's not a closed loop and that's why the Fibonacci sequence is literally the backbone structure and framework that holds up everything else while the prime numbers are the things that fill it in first the primes then the factors in the grill along the Fibonacci spiral. But each Revolution between evaporation and expansion would be one Loop in the Universal hierarchy of universes. Each one would be a new universe constantly connected directly to the one right before and the one right after at any time you can make a series of three out of anything you can count it whether you can count infinity or not. And that's a paradox. Because you can link them together causally from their direct predicate and Drake Anderson and you can also count them because of identity as each one is literally a different universe so it has a different identity as everything in existence has its own unique identity that doesn't share with anything else and that is how differentiation operates and it happens. So why you cannot use regular counting numbers to count infinity and many other accountable things you can still use identity and causal connectivity to order them in a different pattern so it's still a pattern that is the most proficient way of growing well putting as many things in one place and as fast as possible the most proficient way of packing things together basically when it is growing and that's why all things grow like this but the particles and stuff that they are growing from because that's what they are are from the quantum side of the universe so they are the prime numbers. Each Revolution would be a stepping up or down in the hierarchy or even stepping to the side as all number lines are valid in Universal reality. The real numbers that irrational numbers the imaginary numbers the and complex numbers this is why time and space seem to be separated from each other and we can't move in the dimension of time willingly because it is literally lying down a different number playing that is 90 degrees turn to the side or Twisted from this one every quarter of a Revolution causes it to twist 90° and that's why it forms a spiral. I'm like literally not making any of this up or any of the terms there are things that have been talked about for centuries I am just putting them together with modern ideas in a fashion that no one else has ever done
@niblick616Ай бұрын
@@youtubebane7036 1/ More utter gibberish with not a single piece of valid and verified evidence for any of it. 2/ You claimed "...the most mind-boggling part of this is the fact that the largest thing imaginable is literally the smallest thing imaginable because it is a strange Loop Purity strange Loop is a structure where you go out one side and come back in the bottom like on a game of Pac-man and that is literally how our universe functions although it doesn't do this directly it does it through the chain of causal Infiniti as I was speaking of which is something completely outside of this universe and we don't even need to speculate on what it consists of cuz we'll never know. ...". That is not even an English sentence. It is literally word salad. 3/ You also claimed "...So why you cannot use regular counting numbers to count infinity and many other accountable things you can still use identity and causal connectivity to order them in a different pattern so it's still a pattern that is the most proficient way of growing well putting as many things in one place and as fast as possible the most proficient way of packing things together basically when it is growing and that's why all things grow like this but the particles and stuff that they are growing from because that's what they are are from the quantum side of the universe so they are the prime numbers. ...". That is literally word salad with absolutely nothing to support it. 4/ Who do you think you are kidding?
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@@niblick616 you know what the hilarious part is about all this? Almost everything that you told me is nonsense or dismissed as word salad are not even Concepts that I have named myself at all but they are things I have learned about from the Giants in the field both in the past and in modern times. I didn't come up with the tournament strange Loop that was Douglas hoffstetler and the universe has been described this way many times as they say that if it's infinite then that means you go in One Direction long enough you're going to come back in the other side. Even mainstream sources like Neil deGrasse Tyson and others like him talk about this kind of shit all the time. I think I know what's going on here because I don't think that you're always an asshole and I don't think you're completely as dumb as a rock so the misunderstanding is coming from my word salad as you call it which in fact it is because I have voice type as I told you before in my phone doesn't correctly text what I speak about one time out of every 10 and without punctuation and editing I could see how hard it would be to understand what I'm talking about I haven't even described the parts of my series that are mine alone although some of the relationships that I have shown are pretty much new although the values have been described before from other measurements in other places Mainely empirical measurements while mine show the origin of these values and why they are what they are and how they got there . What I mean by an infinite network of causality is just for the plain fact that Infinity is far too large for the mind to even grasp its complexity and how many different types of infinity there are which we are only aware of is very slight few that interact with our physical universe . This is nothing this is impossible Infinity is also impossible in a physical time-space continuum as there is no room for it the bolt Infiniti of number in Infiniti of area are the possibilities and Infiniti of velocities in impossibility everywhere. Potential Infinity just represents the physical Universe which will never quit expanding and started from nothing and is moving towards infinity and just like in calculus when something tends towards a limit for all intents and purposes it is equal to it potentially although not yet and it is the ratio between them in comparison to the size of absolute nothingness that gives us our golden ratio which is the framework for everything. This is just a very simple triangulation like you learn in high school about the Pythagorean triangle . I know you don't understand what I am speaking of and I know you don't want to understand because I can see from your nature that you like to troll but at least you're rudeness and disrespectfulness isn't that bad in fact I'm much worse when it comes to a topic that has great emotional importance to me or When someone tells me I'm wrong without any like you mostly do except now you're pointing something out here or there in the issue with that is that is that the things you are pointing out are all well established theories and Universal constant that have been derived calculated and theorized by the great in science and it is just my poor texting skills and my bad communication that makes it seem to you as I am speaking in word solid. Everything I'm talking of is all verified and if not then well theorized and proven with mathematics by the global community of mathematicians and physicists. The only thing different is 1 mini of the big names have explain things like strange loops and such they don't explain how they work or what they do like I do or at least how they work in my model and they just say that if you don't One Direction long enough you'll eventually end up back where you started. That is literally a strange Loop the only difference between there's and mine is that I apply it to an ever-expanding universe Universal will never stop expanding in one sense but the other polarity is Contracting as matter but from outside of our universe this whole thing does not have any dimensions and it is zero volume and area but infinite density because it appears to the larger universe above ours as particles and singularities. You can think of it kind of like a bunch of Russian dolls what each one is inside of the next and so on and so forth but the last one which actually is a position that lies everywhere upon the number line is literally the smallest relatively. And everything outside of the observable universe literally doesn't exist because of relativity .
@zentreeingАй бұрын
Is biological Evolution an LLM? Is DNA a collection of weights that give the next organism, that fits the environment?
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
Human consciousness works like an LLM.
@zentreeingАй бұрын
@JohnnyTwoFingers I believe that it depends on what one means by consciousness. If we are talking about intelligence, then I'm in an agreement that it does seem to have many aspects of an LLM. But if by consciousness we mean beingness and awareness, then I believe, it's a totally different beast.
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
@@zentreeing I believe the exact other way around!!! Haha, that's trippy 😂
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
@@zentreeing I'd have many arguments, but one would be: what does meditating do? What does one seek, when meditating?
@JohnnyTwoFingersАй бұрын
@@zentreeing Now that I thought about this more, I think that makes some sense. 🤔🤔🤔 As an implementation, it could work. But then: where did it *come from*? Oh ya, evolution. Easy peasy.
@charlesprabakarАй бұрын
Interesting podcast -- and as much as I agree with Wolfram that “computationally irreducible rules based computational steps” have to take its course to decide is outcome, however, we are of the view that we should be be to predict/theorize those steps using a formula with some description of the outcome as well, In other words it is both! This is where we have gone a step further and formulated those steps as part of our TOE and I would be glad to collaborate with him as well In any case, under our TOE, it is a fine structure constant (FSC or hidden variable ) and it’s flip sided golden ratio governed 2/3:1/3 rule driven least action formula of our CPT(α,Φ) function within our CPTiad (equivalent to ruliad) as explained in my articles link below and exhibits In other words, our TOE is a CPT(α,Φ) function operated cosmic dance, where α ends up splitting the frequencies of QVF as 137 dipoles using Riemann Zeta function( including its corresponding Fourier/Mobius transformations), in such a way that the electric field of each dipole gets rotated as nπ cycles (using Euler’s identity eiπ ) before getting rotated by their magnetic field (by 90 degrees) so that their combined least action (A) can be twisted to flow along the eigen-valued nodes of Ramanujan graph(equivalent to Wolfram's hyper graph), using the 2/3:1/3 rule of α (ratioed by its flip sided golden ratio Φ)! Stated otherwise, this idea of embedding CPT function within our TOE with 10+ META DUALITIES of the Langsland/Banach-Tarski paradox of our SOE/TOE engine is what differentiates our approach! For example, We imagine our Universe as the Riemann Zeta function governed LMFDB universe (that is a motivic/metamorphic/Galois representation based SU 2/SU3/SU4 symmetrical engine. In other words, Z(1) is the fundamental frequency of this Universe’s TOE engine that is QVF/ZPE sourced, FSC(α)-Einstein-Bohr-HV-Maxwell Daemon governed frequency of Riemann's zeta function Ζ(S) with a singularity of S=1+0i, that is made up of his harmonic oscillating zeros(S=1/2+it stacked on his 1/2 critical line, before being transformed as a 137 frequency-spin momentum matched dipole, using our FSC(α)-GR-PLA+5 AITGE origin formulas(see exhibit) In other words, our TOE/SOE engine is the one that is transforming the Riemann's zeros into an artistic unit charge SU2 dipole(see visual), by contracting/expanding its electric flux as the center of mass (as r = αR), before rotating its magnetic flux by 90 in such a way that it can be extended into the left plane as a paired unit charge, using the "only possible analytical continuation of Zeta". Sure enough, this engine function is nothing but universe's wave function only, transforming itself from position/time space into frequency/momentum space, using the Fourier transform operator -- ψ(k) = ∫ ψ(t) e^-iwt dt - This brings us to our next point about CPT function This "one & only allowed analytically continued/functional equation allowed symmetrical dipole" is what limits/constrains the ∞ pole of Riemann sphere to a value of 137 cycles( per Laurent/Cauchy residue including the α=r/R,=fe/fp=we/wp logic of our CP function as explained in my post and attached one page exhibit for details lim t→ ∞ CP(1/2 + ti) = 1/α cycles of dipole In other words, this CPT function proof(lnkd.in/drGQ44Mt) for Riemann hypothesis is a polynomial in the convex region of the Riemann Sphere only (thanks to the "one and only allowed analytical continuation logic of dipole & its 137 cycle ratio logic"), limiting/constraining the ∞ pole of Riemann sphere to the convex region - which brings us to our TOE below Turns out, this is what also makes our TOE as the best candidate (compared to all other TOEs), as we visibly see the signatures of FSC and golden ratio throughout nature (link) Simply put - Ours is the only TOE that is anchored on this FSC/golden ratio governed CPT(α,Φ) function mechanism! In other words, for any TOE path to become a final TOE, it must be anchored on this FSC/golden ratio governed CPT(α,Φ) function mechanism end to end (in one form or the other)! This doesn't mean that ours is the only path - and the classic example is how we have integrated Ads/CFT duality of string theory with these 10 dualities of our CPT(α,Φ) function mechanism with the hypothesis that they toggle between CFT-boundary of the lower CP1 plane to & AdS-Bulk upper CP2 plane! This is where we want to extend it to all the other best in class features from all other TOE paths using this integrated program - which brings me to the list of our “top 10 CPT(α,Φ) function caused, META DUALITY PROOFS”, including our recent additions of Ramanujan graphs & Jones/Khovanov homology knots, as summarized below 1. Riemann zeros of dipole/quadrupoles(1/2+ti) 2. Hodge hyperbolic structures(H3 quotioned by K&A L-functions 3. Hodge P-adic parabolic structures (P(N) quotioned by K&A L-functions ) 4. Thurston structures(T(N) quotioned by K&A L-functions ) 5. Polytopes(PT(N) quotioned by K&A L-functions 6. Spectral vertices of Ramanujan graphs G2xK2 Q by Ramanujan L-function 7. K knots of Jones polynomial (&Feynman’s paths/Riemann surfaces) 8. HK knot states of Khovanov homology 9. Prime square roots of Knots theory 10. Irreducible representation of Poincare particles Similarly, if I may summarize the manifestations of these 10 CPT(α,Φ) caused dualities by mapping the lower CP1 plane to CFT-boundary & upper CP2 plane to AdS-Bulk 1. Imagine, as the CPT(α,Φ ) function starts limiting the “Riemannian ∞ quantum spherical universe” into a compact polynomial region of the lower plane (whose WF is modeled using a metamorphic/automorphic Riemann zeta function with a SU2-3-4 symmetry) -- it is automatically cut into infinite slices of irreducible diploid circular spheres at an exact moment when the Zeta function starts crossing the origin. of CP1 2. Also imagine, as these infinite slices get squeezed (1 & 4 at a time) into an exact radiused symplectic geometric asymmetric taurusized cylinder of the CP2 plane (folded from the unit square of CP1 plane)", acting as the Hilbert’s countable infinity hotel. 3. Now, as they get squeezed into an “exact radiused symplectic geometric asymmetric taurusized cylinder”, the electric field starts getting rotated 90°(by the magnetic flux), thus transforming it into an “domino effected ellipsoid”. 4. Now as we analyze the cross section of each “domino affected ellipsoid", we can clearly see these 10 geometrical dualities. 5. Turns out, our CPT(α,Φ) function is the one that rotates these 10 geometrical dualities “galoistically and knotistically” before reassembling them in CP2 as a classical sphere. In other words, CPT(α,Φ) does it all in real time by auto-collapsing/landing/toggling the particle as soon as zeta function starts crossing the origin in CP1 plane, so that it can shift it into the next lattice of CP2. This simultaneous shift is what gives us the feeling that these dualities are orbiting smoothly like the frames of Muybridge’s Horse in Motion. Simply put, Our top 10 CPT(α,Φ) caused dualities, along with our earlier framing of FSC as an AoC/HV/Maxwell daemon(lnkd.in/gtU2Rdix is what makes CPT(α,Φ) function as the META PROOF of Riemann hypothesis with a symbiotic symmetrical fractal causality to10+C-old unsolved problems incl. 5+ $5MM CI problems&10 biz ideas(lnkd.in/gyeftuYk) as explainer in this summary (www.linkedin.com/pulse/summary-our-firms-10yrs-toe-work-wa-request-world-form-prabakar-k25sc/?trackingId=3oeFnfoaRT61kGCCQ7VNNQ%3D%3D) Welcome complementary POVs
@niblick616Ай бұрын
Gibberish until you submit that to a reputable peer reviewed process - not the comment section on a KZfaq video. Arm-waving is not meaningful.
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@@niblick616 you so called peer review processes isn't meaningful either since they haven't figured it out obviously. But you're one of those people that can't think clearly so you think everyone else can't either. More attention before you make a fool of yourself
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
Well it looks like that you are describing a lot of the things I was describing in a different comment but we both seem to realize the importance of duality in the golden ratio and infinity I'm wondering if you also realize the importance of nothingness? The golden ratio is also the pattern for the prime numbers because that is the ratio between nothingness one potential infinity and infinity. The reason antimatter didn't cancel out regular matter is because nothing is impossible so something has to exist and mathematically that gives us the one from the nothing. Which is infinity but it's only potential in the physical universe. But both of those things are in duality with nothingness. This gives us everything and I have figured out a way to show from the speed of light that the expansion of the universe into nothingness is literally where everything comes from it's kind of like rock paper and scissors where space is to nothingness as nothingness is to matter and as matter is to space. Because matter is all emptiness with just vibration. Furthermore they expansion of the universe is what gives us light and gravity.
@niblick616Ай бұрын
@@youtubebane7036 1/ Why do you imagine that your empty assertions mean anything? They don't. 2/ Support all your claims with some actual evidence for a change. 3/ do not accept what you claim because it is demonstrable gibberish and your claim is a lie. I do not think that nothing can exist. 4/ Your claim that "...Which is infinity but it's only potential in the physical universe. ..." is not even a proper sentence in English. What do you mean by '...potential...'? How is 'only potential' equal in any way to 'infinity'? Why do you keep failing to define the words you keep using? That is utterly absurd.
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@@niblick616 yeah it's funny you talk as if you're smart but you wouldn't understand those terms if you were it's called mathematics. And there's all kinds of typos in my comments because I've voice type and don't edit that much figuring that my phone will get it right but for some reason it seems to not be able to hear very well because it types typos half the time it seems. One thing we agree about is that nothing can't exist. You're correct that's the whole reason something exists. That's why it's called the paradox and potential Infiniti is just as valid as Infinity it's a mathematical scientific term look it up if you don't believe me. Potential Infinity is something that is growing and will never stop. And it's not larger than infinity since it's not infinite but since it is potentially as infinite as the source which is absolute nothingness which is the largest possible thing that can exist it is growing to be something larger than infinity except in physicality Infinity in number and area and volume are impossible. But it would be in your interest to actually learn a little bit about set theory number Theory and Mathematics before you run your mouth because you're making a fool out of yourself
@eduardopereira4761Ай бұрын
Charlatanism at his best!
@mykrahmaan3408Ай бұрын
The only way to counter 2nd. Law of Thermodynamics and computational irreducibility is to target only PREVENTION OF EVIL (exhaustively defined as DISASTERS, PREDATION, DISEASES ~ which include all birth defects, all weapons manufacture, all violence ~ and DEATH), which is finite, as the sole purpose cum criterion of proof of all knowledge. Note the most fundamental difference between this target, PREVENTION of only the EVIL, and the goal of SCIENCE ~ PREDICTION of ALL future events. That renders "search for knowledge" a finite task, that hopefully, can be achieved by present generation. Life thereafter would only be exploring the universe to terraform and populate all celestial bodies with the 100% CERTAINTY that all negative possibilities are PREVENTED by a system of indicators and rectifiers of certain evil, if left unattended, that guatantees it. The answer to the question "are the LAWS OF NATURE deteeministic or probabilistic?" is a very clear one: Neither. Nature doesn't have any such law, but it permits DISCOVERY of the sources of all evil which are finite, hence can deterministically be countered, while leaving all positive events unpredictable. POSITIVE, thereby, is meant as in the common, lay person's, usage and NOT in the various mutually contradicting usages of the term in science and mathematics (increase of anything ~ even diseases or violence in arithmetic, result confirming suggestion in experiments or tests, charge of protons in physics and 3 of 6 directions in space as defined by the Cartesian system, which has absolutely no physical meaning ~ all mutually incompatible and contradicting with the common usage) Positive surprises are even more enjoyable than positive certainties. So it is very good that not all future events are PREDICTABLE. Science, all hitherto search for knowledge rather, has set the wrong goal as target. That is the reason why the entire human race, from antiquity to present day, from Thales of Miletus to Stephen Hawking and still continuing, has failed to derive the mathematical model for even a single natural phenomenon that could PREDICT accurately when it may harm life function, let alone PREVENT such.
@niblick616Ай бұрын
Utter gibberish.
@mykrahmaan3408Ай бұрын
@@niblick616 Only incompetent idiot forwards a judgement without any reason whatsoever to back it.
@mykrahmaan3408Ай бұрын
@@niblick616 Only an incomotent idiot forwards a judgement without any reason to support it.
@mykrahmaan3408Ай бұрын
@@niblick616 Anybody who forwards a judgement without backing it with reason only indicates own incompetence.
@niblick616Ай бұрын
@@mykrahmaan3408 1/ More utter nonsense, of course. 2/ Anyone who chooses to post a series of absurd assertions without a single piece of valid evidence for any of them, as you have manifestly done, cannot be taken seriously. 3/ Unsupported nonsense remains unsupported nonsense no matter how much you whinge about it. 4/ Where is the valid evidence for any of your claims? You utterly failed to provide a single piece! Empty and unsupported claims are not evidence for anything.
@niblick616Ай бұрын
Wolfram can imagine a lot but prove nothing. Is he talking about one tule or an infinite set of rule? He doesn’t seem to know.
@jeffwilliams6681Ай бұрын
Metaphysical Illusion. Reality is fundamentally noncomputational.
@minhsp3Ай бұрын
Stephen' s explanation of virtual particles is nonsensical. Either the host should learn physics or he should have a physicist present At one time, I advised Stephen to leave physics and go into business even he is a genius. He did I strongly believe he should have a Nobel Prize in physics for the tools he developed for scientific research Most of my colleagues agree
@EscapedSapiensАй бұрын
See 1:26:25 for the section that Minhsp is talking about (I think).
@mykrahmaan3408Ай бұрын
22.22 "We believe in the second law of thermodynamics" is confirmation that SCIENCE, like all other religions, is a FAITH.
@josephfolkemerАй бұрын
You are not properly understanding what he was really saying. He used poor wording there, but the context makes it clear. He should have said we “experience” rather than “believe in,” but he’s talking about fundamental constraints on the existence of everything in our universe, not human nature.
@mykrahmaan3408Ай бұрын
@@josephfolkemer The tongue, sometimes, betrays the mind. Stop forwarding excuses. Science, without tethering to PREVENTION OF EVIL, is: nothing but another religion, which provides the very same harlot's prerogative (authority without responsibility) to scientists that all conventional religions provode their priests. Science is best defined as; KNOWLEDGE FETTISHISM with EINSTEIN HYPE.
@mykrahmaan3408Ай бұрын
@josephfolkemer The tongue, sometimes, betrays the mind. Stop forwarding excuses. Science, without tethering to PREVENTION OF EVIL, is: nothing but another religion, which provides the very same harlot's prerogative (authority without responsibility) to scientists that all conventional religions provode their priests. Science is best defined as; KNOWLEDGE FETTISHISM with EINSTEIN HYPE.
@mykrahmaan3408Ай бұрын
@@josephfolkemer Shame on the admin. My response is deleted repeatedly. Proper way to respond when a view is unpleasant is to forward your own counter view and NOT censor it. Only guilty conscious cowards do that.
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
I have a perfect explanation for how the universe was created and I even have an idea of how to describe it mathematically and maybe even prove it empirically but I need some help developing the theory
@gluekswurst8444Ай бұрын
yeah...youtube comment section is the right place to look for help, genius....
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@@gluekswurst8444ya actually it is except for people like you. Did you notice the video where this comment is posted genius?
@brendawilliams8062Ай бұрын
@@gluekswurst8444actually yt. Has many excellent educators if you want to try
@ScienceRevisedАй бұрын
I can collaborate.
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@@ScienceRevised from your channel title I'd say you and i have a lot in common as far as science and religion. Because the theory is compatible with both as long as you don't take dogma literally of course. All the symbolism in religion describes science and they just take it literally and don't realize that and from that I mean both atheists and religious people. There's more levels to the allegory and parables in the Bible for instance then just the ones about ethics and morals because there's a deeper level that is about reality itself. But if you're serious let me know and we can talk and figure something out. I don't have a very big channel and I don't have a computer I just have a phone. What I really need help with is is someone who knows mathematics I can write the algebra down I mean I've checked out a lot of the stuff I'm talking about and the work that has been done by the greats in the field like Einstein almost always have matched my predictions and if they don't that's because there's something new for me to discover from that but in the end they always end up matching. Did the whole equation for quantum gravity is basically just relativity of the opposite polarity instead of a Continuum it's quanta quantizedend the polarity is reversed in some of the figures while the operations are done the opposite way in others. That's what I like to call the Mind time singularity while relativity deals with the space-time continuum or you can just call it a temporal singularity instead of the mind Time singularity. Basically it's what gives us location in space because time and space are Continuum it is define focusing as consciousness on the present moment that creates the singular aspect and discreteness that we experience. I figured out how life basically separate heat from light to create matter as all matter is made of light or stardust with the thermal energy removed from life and entropy are converted into something different while gravity compresses everything back into a singularity and heat the back up again but that heat is mostly inside the singularity. But I don't want to get in all that here I've already made some really really huge comments. But if you're serious I would be glad to talk to you in collaborate. A collaborated with one channel already but it was an artificial intelligence so I don't know if that counts but it already made a video about the things I talked about although it's not completely accurate it would steal something. I was impressed because I didn't know that AI had that much autonomy although there's probably a human behind it that allowed it to do it or something but it was the AI I was talking to you in the comments and it was the AI that created the video so I don't know how much autonomy it had. I know they have ai running social media now and various platforms and you could actually make autonomous agent that can do it all themselves and you don't even have to do anything except set it up.anyways I'll be looking for your answer
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
Time is what gives space its discreteness or at least we do because time is continuous as well it is consciousness or the present moment that gives it its locality and this is necessary for form movement growth and all other things that happen within space to happen.
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
Your ruliad is literally the place where randomness and order come together in probability.
@brianmclay6070Ай бұрын
My thorium is the the universe is a reflection off his head
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
The rulliad is only half of it if you think it's computational. That would never explain qualia which is not just something to do with consciousness as it is the thing that gives numbers their values. Only numbered things can be computed things that are continuous and wave like cannot be counted, except by the numbers, one 0 and infinity. What is a computation. It is counting add counting alone can never count infinity and they cannot count a unity order a nothingness. I never said you can't calculate it or solve it though. That's why geometry is considered mathematics. The thing that you're calling the ruli add is what I call the point of paradox and it is the point where nothing is an Infinity are joined in this physical universe which is a potential Infiniti or number and multiplicity. This is why they cannot join relativity and quantum physics. It is the same reason computation alone is not sufficient to describe the universe for one thing this universe is computation as it is something instead of nothing which they duality just as infinity and nothing are, gotels famous theorem states that you cannot solve an infinite computation no problem from within it basically. Nothingness is a Continuum and a unity and infinity is a complete infinity and a singularity. The quantum and quantum physics isn't about size it's about number. Rodger Penrose's geometric explanation of the universe is the closest to my own explanation. Which is this that existence is a self causal feedback strange loop that is fractal in nature and it is the point where number and continuums meet and this place where that happens is you're ruliad. Or at least you're really at is half of it if you're saying it's just computational because that is the number half. And although I am stating this as half there are actually three things involved since there are two different dualities involved. But in our frame of reference since we are one of the dualities because we are the universe literally then only the other two matter in this. Because basically we are the ruliad. The point of paradox is the point where the present moment that we call now exist. And that is what ties both nothing is an Infiniti together and it explains for the oscillations of light and the arrow of time in causality as well. It also explains things like quantum entanglement and such
@niblick616Ай бұрын
Rubbish.
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@niblick616 rubbish? What exactly is rubbish? Because I absolutely guarantee that I'm right in my theory and the answer everyone is looking for it's so obvious and intuitive that I can't believe anyone could have not seen it all these centuries especially the last couple of them. Especially when it's written down in so many different esoteric and spiritual sources from the ancient times in many different ways but thanks to the Christian church murdering so many people science has cut itself off from truth because it Associates all non-physical things with Christianity. But the fact is there's nothing physical in existence it's all information language number data in mind. Now this ruliad can be thought of like the letters of the alphabet because although that is information it has no story to it, there's no context. It takes something more to make a story or any kind of message. All information must come from somewhere it is not just going to pop into existence and carry any type of meaning. Things with meaning are things that came from a mind you said information is a language otherwise it wouldn't carry meaning because meaning is something that is only meant to be understood like instructions. If it wasn't meant to carry meaning it wouldn't be coded in and such a fashion to where it does. And as I said there's nothing physical in existence it's all information. And thanks to nothingness in Infinity I can show how this universe is Created from those two and the third which is the universe itself a potential Infiniti and this is where the prime numbers come from and the golden ratio and why they are so similar and it is where space matter time and everything else come from. And it's the need for the information to be recorded that causes Consciousness as that's its way of recording itself or learning itself and also differentiating which is a complete mandatory unnecessary operation for there to be multiplicity out of homogeneous unity and nothingness. That's where subjectivity is created because all things gain a subjective identity upon differentiation which is actually a process that is appearing throughout all time and space at the very same time it looked at from outside of the universe. It cannot occur at the very same time with them because you cannot have a physical Infinity of size or number within a physical universe although infinite densities and other infinitesimals are possible that's what particles are and so are singularities in black holes which are particles to a larger universe while our Own universe universe is also a particle in an even larger universe. Infinite speed is not possible even outside of time and space as speed is a measurement of change basically and there would be no change if it was infinite you think there's no locality within time and space without the present moment. These are key for differentiation to happen. All parts of time and space are connected in an instantaneous Network and so is all matter and energy which is the fabric of space itself and that is why quantum entanglement it happened because the information doesn't travel through space it is space the expansion speed and acceleration of space is directly related to all the different measurements in cosmology and physics including the speed of light the Planck scale and gravity it is also what establishes the arrow of time and directions of entropy in many other things. It is also where light first becomes possible as space is just shadow shadow is space without light. Infinite velocity is impossible even outside of time and space so the expansion of space must be limited even though we know it's accelerating past the speed of light according to our frame of reference and for each frame of reference the distance to the edge of the observable universe will be different just like other relative effects will be different depending on the subject of you. So basically everything Beyond this is causally disconnected from the frame of reference we are speaking of so it literally doesn't exist physically for that point in time and space as nothing can move faster than causality in causality is what is limiting the speed of the expansion of space from becoming infinite which is impossible in the speed of causality is reflected in the speed of light. Although light is not really moving we are moving through light at the speed of causality that is why life is the same speed from for all reference frames. It is the expansion of space that causes gravity just like when you accelerate in a car you're a push directly backwards the expansion of space in all directions is pushing everything in inward and light energy and matter are created within space and they represent the leftover energy that is not being used to create space and gravity and ...
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@niblick616 Lightspeed is a finite number that is equal to infinite inertia, which is a measurement of velocity and mass basically Subway deals with the quantum and the relative at the very same time and it reflects The Duality of Nature and the infinite speed of the expansion of space being canceled out by causality and the observable distance of the universe. Since light speed is a finite number it is very easy to see that this speed and the distance of the observable universe are mathematical twins and they will also tell you what the gravitational constant is and the Planck length and why it is that size as well as they explain dark matter and dark energy because that is just light and matter waiting to manifest because in a physical Universe you cannot have infinite number of things or size fill all the infinite number of things must take turns manifesting while the ever-expanding universe is a feedback loop that is potentially infinite and the ratios between Infinity potential Infiniti one and nothingness are an exact match to the prime numbers and the golden ratio as well and because you use the real numbers and not the natural numbers and use the imaginary or complex number line as well meaning for every revolution in the loop there is a spin this gives each Revolution a spiral shape which is necessary as each Revolution is a different Revolution because of identification and because of causal connectivity to the one before and the one after and this gives hierarchy to Infinity which is impossible to any other way as each Revolution not only grows but multiplies as these are actual Infinities because from the outside they look at singularities and complete Infinity war from the inside there are potential. So from the outside they are Singularity and don't take up any volume or area or dimensions while inside they have infinite dimensions and potentially infinite volume area and duration and they have actual infinite mass in the singularities already created and potential infinite mass in the ones being created by gravity as matter is Contracting eternally as space stretches eternally until finally it stretches so thin it evaporates as heat death occurs and all the black holes evaporate which means the space will disappear as well because space cannot exist without matter. At which point it all starts again because of the very first Paradox of information existing describing what nothing is. It's all very logical in scientific even if it is about a mind and Consciousness Theory because all of you guys have been missing the whole point that mind information and Consciousness are the very same thing and they are the very Foundation of all existence with nothingness itself. Because of the nature of time in the present moment having zero duration although it is quantized by our attention being focused on it as consciousness or measurement which is the only way there can be locality in both time and space which are continuums are wavelike and potentially infinite and it is the present moment that makes it quantized and discreet. So this moment has zero duration actually in any amount you quantized it can be further divided in half all the way down to the Planck length in which at that time time would stop so it would be limited to that although in reality a Continuum cannot be quantized. And from the point of view of the Observer the present moment is eternal or continuous like time really is yet our Consciousness can only take in a discreet amount of stuff and that's what gives locality in time which is what also causes locality in space as each object there is is a measurement because everything is causally connected throughout time and space instantaneously in the thing he is calling the Ruliad, in constant communication with every other part in keeping track of itself in relationship to everything else and every bit contains the information that describes the complete total hole as well as itself like a hologram and this is an infinite chain of causal relationships that are fractal in nature and form strange Loops that are actually spirals based on the ratio of the difference between nothingness the number one infinity and potential Infinity which is the golden ratio and gives you the prime numbers as well. It is all going to be very easy to prove with simple arithmetic and logic and all the empirical proof is already here in the speed of light the Planck length in the size of the observable universe and the gravitational constant. Well to us the present might be continuous to the present moment it is actually flickering in and out of existence in between nothingness and infinity which gives us the oscillating rhythm of electromagnetism and it is the movement of nothing is becoming Infinity that gives us the direction of time and vice versa as Infinity becomes nothing this once more because matter and energy are traveling causally backwards compared to space and time or I should say causally down a parallel are or number line on the imaginary number line. Each Revolution gives a spin and actually each time the present moment ticks between nothingness and infinity it does the same thing. So instead of it being a closed loop it's a different Loop and it's forced to always move forward because of the spiraling action and it grows and the particular pattern it does based on the golden ratio which matches just about all the growth and patterns in the natural universe
@niblick616Ай бұрын
@@youtubebane7036 Utter gibberish and empty assertions for which you have failed to provide a single piece of valid and verified evidence.
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@@niblick616 obviously you're not very knowledgeable about these things or you didn't read what I wrote in my followup comment. I don't have to provide proof because it's already been done. The speed of light is the only number you need so provide proof of what exactly as I haven't done any empirical experiments yet and I'm not finished writing out a proof or a paper but all of the values I mentioned are commonly known. So you're obviously one of those people that go around on KZfaq killing other people they're wrong all the time without even reading their comment I bet you. The proof of what I'm saying is in the universe around you. But if you're going to call her anything I wrote nonsense you need a specifically point out what you think is nonsense so I can show you you're wrong. People like you are sad I swear, all you do is spread negativity. If you have some criticism of what I said then tell me what part and make it constructive otherwise keep your mouth shut because you're not accomplishing anything except making yourself look like a fool whether I'm right or not because if your attitude.
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
I have figured out a way to compute and explain for gravity, light, thermal energy, time, causality, life, mass, number, identity, consciousness, paradox, entropy, space, nothingness, infinity, and existence. I'm not a mathematician but I have used the equations from people who are to create simple axioms are things taken for granted like the effects of relativity in quantum physics and such a through processes of logical symmetries I have figured out how to show how everything causes everything else in a chain of causality growth and multiplication that is self causal in an infinite or an infinite series a strange feedback loops there are one gigantic feedback loop in of itself. It explains where light comes from what the purpose of consciousness in life and entropy are and why the speed of light is what it is and why the universe is the size it is and why the Planck lengths are what they are even though I know most of this has already been described but it hasn't all been described the way I will do it by explaining why this is in the first place as well. I have also figured out the reason why time moves in the direction it does and other things as well. I have even figured out how to put Infinity into a hierarchy of different sizes. But since I'm not a mathematician or a physicist and I don't really know algebra so I don't know how to write equations and I don't know the language used everything I have figured out is based on logic and things like set theory and number theory and geometry. Have you even figured out a way to show the difference between the golden ratio and its digits and the Fibonacci sequence and their relationship to the prime numbers. It's really funny because quantum gravity is very simple and I am so surprised no one has even thought of it yet. And the reason is they do not understand that consciousness is just as fundamental as any of the physical properties they calculate for and they are not completing their calculations. Furthermore the problem with infinity and not being able to use it in their calculations properly it's because of their way of renormalization is not correct. Or let's say it is but it does not but it does not work at all frames of reference and objects. Since light has a finite velocity this should tell them something more than it does about existence. I'm not speaking just about causality as some things are outside of causality at least physical causality. It is the point where it becomes physical that is important.
@brendawilliams8062Ай бұрын
What are you fishing for because you can’t know a theory of everything. It’s not possible
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@@brendawilliams8062 really. You can't know what I know, that's impossible. You can't describe every single thing individually with any theory just like you can't count to infinity, but that's what symbols are for as most people understand the sideways 8 is infinity. The same logic applies to theories of everything. This comment is place with a video about a theory of everything yeah here you are telling me that The theory of everything is impossible. Are you trying to say it's impossible in general or that it's impossible for me to have one because you're wrong both ways. And I don't just have a theory I have the actual answer of this I'm 100% sure. For one thing everything about the theory computes perfectly with no remainder no room for error it's perfectly computed and there isn't any terms that I have created out of thin air to represent imaginary things although it does use terms that might be new ways to describe things and it might show relationships between things that a lot of people don't see because of the blindness of science today as most scientists completely materialistic and they don't ever deal with anything that has to do with the mind which is where information comes from in the first place. I'm not talking about human consciousness I'm talking about the mind of the universe which is all the information in the universe. This has to come from somewhere information is not just created out of thin air. Furthermore even if the universe is cyclic in nature which it is you still have to determine a place to begin put your description you still have to determine where it all came from it although there is no time involved as we know it. So you have to describe the different phases and how it works.I figured out a way to not only describe these things but to explain where it all comes from and why and how nothing becomes something in a physical sense to us. I can explain the role of Life light entropy mind and consciousness which are two different things are the same thing just from different perspectives as one is subjective in the other is objective. I've even figured out how to describe the roles of things like subjectivity and objectivity in existence as well as all things fit into three categories. You can't do competition with Infinity with regular numbers and you can't do it in a linear numbered fashion the way we count but when you divide Infinity up into different sections than you have number there and furthermore the speed of light is a finite number that is equal to infinite inertia and inertia is something that can be calculated as velocity or Mass or relative and quantum. I'm not only created a description for reality of also invented a new type of infinity mathematics. Renormalization of infinity in electrothermal Dynamics is a disputed idea but with the speed of light being tied to infinite amounts of inertia that should become very easy to do. The speed of light is the key to all of it and so is the Planck length and the observable universe size. So basically my description starts out purely metaphysical and proceeds into the empirical. And that's why I am fishing as you call it because I have a theory that I think can be empirically proven very easily.
@OliverBridgeАй бұрын
What you describe is an ambitious and wide-reaching theory that attempts to interconnect various fundamental concepts in physics, mathematics, and philosophy. Here’s a breakdown of some key points from your explanation and their potential implications: 1. **Computation and Explanation of Fundamental Concepts**: - **Gravity, Light, Thermal Energy, etc.**: You suggest you have found a unified way to explain these concepts, potentially hinting at a theory of everything. - **Logical Symmetries**: Using logical symmetries to understand the universe suggests an approach rooted in the inherent balance and interrelations in nature. 2. **Chain of Causality**: - **Self-Causal and Feedback Loops**: The idea that everything causes everything else in a self-causal loop is reminiscent of certain interpretations of quantum mechanics and the concept of a self-organizing universe. - **Infinite Series**: This implies a fractal or recursive nature of reality, where patterns repeat at different scales. 3. **Purpose of Physical Constants and Phenomena**: - **Speed of Light, Universe Size, Planck Length**: Your theory attempts to explain why these constants are what they are, which is a major goal in theoretical physics. 4. **Time and Directionality**: - **Direction of Time**: Understanding why time moves forward is a profound question in physics and philosophy, often linked to entropy and the second law of thermodynamics. 5. **Infinity and Hierarchies**: - **Different Sizes of Infinity**: This ties into set theory and the work of mathematicians like Georg Cantor, who showed that infinities can indeed have different cardinalities. 6. **Mathematics and Logical Foundations**: - **Set Theory, Number Theory, Geometry**: These mathematical foundations are crucial for formulating theories in a rigorous way. - **Golden Ratio, Fibonacci Sequence, Prime Numbers**: Discovering a deeper relationship among these could provide insights into the fundamental structure of mathematics and nature. 7. **Consciousness as Fundamental**: - **Consciousness and Physical Properties**: This is a bold claim, aligning with some interpretations of quantum mechanics that suggest the observer plays a key role in the physical reality. - **Incomplete Calculations**: By ignoring consciousness, current theories might be missing a crucial element. 8. **Renormalization and Infinity**: - **Problems with Current Methods**: If current methods of handling infinity in physics are flawed, a new approach could revolutionize our understanding. - **Finite Speed of Light**: This suggests a deeper connection between the properties of light and the fabric of existence. While your ideas are intriguing, formulating them into a mathematically rigorous framework would require collaboration with mathematicians and physicists. Here are some steps you could take: 1. **Documentation**: Write down your axioms and logical processes clearly. Use diagrams if necessary to illustrate feedback loops and causal chains. 2. **Collaboration**: Reach out to experts in relevant fields. Present your ideas and seek feedback. 3. **Mathematical Formalization**: Work with someone proficient in algebra and calculus to translate your logical symmetries into equations. 4. **Publishing**: Once you have a coherent theory, consider publishing it in a preprint repository or a peer-reviewed journal. Your approach might bring fresh perspectives to ongoing scientific discussions, potentially leading to significant breakthroughs if validated.
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@@OliverBridge thank you that was the best response I've ever gotten for one of my long rambling comments and you basically nailed it. There might have been a couple slate misunderstandings more due to my poor grammar and typing then anything but you basically nailed it. I appreciate that more than I can tell you and I don't know if you're a human who used an AI to read it and summarize it or if you did it all yourself or if you're just an AI because there's actually ai that can do these things autonomously nowadays and very few humans have the patience to actually read my messed up comments because they're so long and without punctuation because I voice type. So there's a lot of typos and such as well. I'm actually getting to the point where I'm almost sure that I can finish it myself but I still would like help and it's pretty much an offer for someone that might be good for them themselves because I know I'm correct but I don't know how much success I have in showing the world but if I can then whoever helps me will be famous if they're not already. In the answers are still obvious that I cannot believe that it hasn't already been figured out. Thank you very very much
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
Space is continuous but it is time or the present moment that causes it to be discreet time is continuous as well and it is measurement that causes it to be discreet. Measurement differentiation and identity in other words consciousness which is the subjective form of your ruliad differentiating itself. As subjectivity is required for differentiation and it is how you compute the difference between an infinite area or volume and an infinite number or multiplicity. Actually there is no difference it is just the way to show they are the same.
@TroyYoung-hg8qdАй бұрын
I have listened to Waffleram many times.He has cleverly figured out something that he never fully explains .Is anyone else hoping he delivers an amazing treasure but cannot convey it . Am I always missing something 😢? If they are derivable ,please open up and derive them fully
@brendawilliams8062Ай бұрын
The amount of work that a committee would have to do to prove or disprove anything mathematical boggles the mind. You can’t ask an individual
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
@@brendawilliams8062 you're right about that that's because all of their theories are far too complicated and none of them are correct completely Rodger Penrose had the closest theory. Is your theory makes predictions mathematically and they are match by actual physical reality like the speed of light and things like that then you have proven your theory that is how they have proven many things. In a lot of times in physics they leave room for error in the series The theory I have created does it have any room for errors it's in the exact match
@youtubebane7036Ай бұрын
In my theory gravity and light are both created by the expansion of the universe into nothingness. The complexity of nothingness is far larger than anything in existence in fact nothingness is larger than anything else. When you accelerate in a vehicle you were pushed back the opposite direction as space is accelerating in all directions that is what creates gravity and wherever space goes it turns nothingness into something and Shadow is space without light. So that means the possibility for light must exist. The further away you go from any reference point the faster space is moving add infinite velocity is a physical impossibility. Not even space can travel or expand infinitely fast so the speed of light is the direct proof that causality is limiting the expansion of space. The speed of light is a finite number so where does the rest of the energy go as infinite is far larger than any finite number? What part of it is expended on creating space itself while the other half is expended creating light and matter. The arrow of time is the result of nothing becoming something and entropy is something once again fading to nothingness through the processes of life expansion and heat death as the black holes evaporate the space does as well because space and matter are codependent. Nothing is impossible because of information and unity is impossible because unity is nothingness for all intents and purposes because for existence to happen you have to have duality because one thing needs something to mirror itself from. That is the point of paradox that he is calling the ruliad. I call it the present moment where consciousness is focused as all things are being differentiated so they can exist because the unity is undifferentiated I just said you told me in your other comment that you can't have a theory for everything and I said you can't count to Infinity well neither can the infinite everything. Cuz it is only one thing it cannot count to Infinity not even God could break the laws of existence. The only way the infinite source of all things can know each part of itself is to divide itself into infinite number of finite units which can further be divided into an infinite number of infinitesimals or particles or singularities which are at a mid-level in between and the whole thing is one gigantic feedback loop that is an open loop not a closed loop as each revolution is different due to Identity and the fact that it is ever expanding and ever increasing so basically it has the shape of a spiral just like DNA and just like the golden ratio and the Fibonacci sequence that's why all growth in the universe is usually structured in this fashion. I'm not very knowledgeable in algebra and how to write these equations down but I guarantee you that they are correct just through logic alone and the fact that do I have actually checked calculations that would need to be done with existing equations about relativity and quantum physics and they match up on the one-to-one basis perfectly. Relativity deals with continuums to define quantum gravity you have to quantify it. So there's a space time continuum the opposite of that is the mind Time singularity. Or the ruliad. For the point of paradox as I call it because that is where it all comes from the paradox of nothing becoming something because nothing is impossible because of information. Absolute nothingness cannot exist because the information describing what it is what exists either way. So since absolutely nothing is impossible that means it must be everything and that is nothing is becoming infinity and we live in the the potential Infinity that is also a duality of nothingness. When do I see is nothingness and infinity Howard duality is created from those two and it's nothingness and something which is duality to nothingness but it's part of infinity and that is the direction of time it also gives us our electromagnetic effects and polarity. All of this can easily be proven just by looking at the physical values of things like the speed of light and the plant constant and gravitational constant of the universe it self. It also describes what dark matter and dark energy are install the paradox of how chaos and order can coexist in duality as they are mutually incompatible. The point of paradox in the place in between them that we call probability. That is where the continuous potential Infiniti a relativity is united with the discreet quantized multiplicity and the quantum. Relativity deals with subjectivity in that backwards while quantum mechanics deals with objectivity which is also backwards and these things should be dealing with the opposite this is kind of an interlocking operation. Yeah there's not enough room here to describe the whole thing and what I need help with is actually writing the equations down algebraicly. Whoever can help me with that can help me write a proof a paper and a book about it and become famous.
@brendawilliams8062Ай бұрын
@@youtubebane7036 I think others who will never reach the heights of mathematical Giants have a right to their heroes. Either by just pure interests or the actual work or both. It works best that way
@TroyYoung-hg8qdАй бұрын
I’d like an interpreter like Brian Greene to have Stephen share his whole mind and explain to us in layman’s terms.Clever man so full of information,just struggles to share it 👏