Hey all! Yes, I am alive, and yes, I still love tanks! This is a video I've been working on for WAY too long, but I'm super proud of the results, and I hope you all enjoy watching it as much as I did making it. The next few uploads on this channel will come quickly I promise, but definitely stick around for the "2023 Year In Review" live stream I'll be doing on THIS channel around the turn of the new year. More info on that in the coming weeks. Subscribe and join the discord to stay up to date on all that stuff! Join my discord: discord.gg/n9bMyt4uKM I Live Stream: kzfaq.info/love/B1iMnyrIYMz9Ft06pWOQVA I have a podcast: kzfaq.info/love/sYlkjyhtSHXuEsyZRExPpQ

As a quibble, "panzer" literally translates to "armor" in German, and their tanks are called "panzerkampfwagen," which means "armored fighting vehicle." Nobody wants to say all that, so panzer is the slang term for tanks. In essence you were correct

Sandbags weren't really there to stop tank shells... It was useful against infantry-carried AT weapons (for example: magnetic mines don't work on sandbags, and something like the panzerfaust would most likely lose most of it's penetrating power against sandbags)

They probably realized it was faster to modify the panzer 4 model then make a panzer 3 model for the stüg

As per usual, the stug 4 being an absolute historical abomination in game is down to large companies keeping their teams apart like the plague. You have the art and design team who do insane amounts of research on all their vehicles and decide on using some more under-represented vehicles of the war, most likely designing them with full intention of them going into the game as a standard form. Then the dev team comes over and says “hey we’re actually putting a tech tree system into the game for the vehicles so players have something to work towards while playing”. This of course makes the art team throw an absolute hissy fit and now they have to shoe horn some cursed designs into their beautiful historically accurate tank for the sake of gameplay

You mention the Japanese air force at 25:04, Japan actually didn't have an air force in the interwar/ww2 period. Air power was split between the army and the navy with the allocation of aviation resources and responsibilities being one of the many things the army and navy liked to squabble over.

Boy, when I seen the Stug. "Holly Jesus, WHAT IS THAT WHAT THE HECK IS THAT!"

You forgot that there's actually a Churchill crocodile in game and the Sturmtiger (as well as some gun carrier vehicles)

I'm guessing, the reason why they added the Stug IV is because they wanted to add the Stug III and maybe didn't have the time due to a schedule or budget to make a whole new Model for it. Also no Panzer 38t no sdkfz 234?

i think that foxhole is the closest game to actually give you the sensation that you are in a war, more specifically that you are in some conflict of the inter wars/ww2 despite being a fictional setting. yea the grafics are not the best but the feeling of you being this small cog in the larger machine that is unmatched

Ima be honest on the Sherman sprocket From my great-grandfather... The people fixing the tank did NOT give an absolute shit where the sprocket came from. Just if it fit. He swapped a .30 cal coax with a .50 once, because they figured out a mounting system. The issue was more the ammo handling. They also mounted an MG42 in the hull, through some careful welding and cutting. The one thing he was most proud of doing, was in one tank, they put in a lot of shooting ports to take M3 grease guns. So imagine a Sherman... but any angle you attack it from, you get fucking shot at from an SMG out the ass end of the turret, or the side of it.

The Armory doesn’t actually show them but each faction actually has their own specific “super tank” that can be summoned with squad points. Germany gets the Sturmtiger, UK gets the Churchill Croc, USA gets the Calliope Sherman, and Japan gets a HaChi. (Also if you can I’d like to see you review the anime Girls Und Panzer)

Back in Battlefield 2142 I remember vehicles having limited ammo, it's interesting to see it come back.

I assume they used the StuG 4 because they already had a P IV chassis so it was cheaper to reuse that than create a P III chassis.

For Germany you forgot about the Panzer 38t and the Puma, overall as a battlefield V player and avid tank fan I actually really enjoyed this! It’s very well done, you know way more than I ever could lol, Hope good things come for you! This channel has a very cool concept I’m sure people will like!

A quick note about the UK line: The Valentine is a Mk.3 unless you use a 6Pdr on it, as the Mk.3 had a redesigned turret to fit a loader so the commander can focus. The Archer, as you said, is quite literally backwards. It was used mainly as artillery and not as a tank hunter, which might be why BFV adapts it to drive as the game intends it to be used. The Churchill 3-inch Gun Carrier was never deployed, and it sucked so badly they'd rather stuff a 76mm gun on the sherman and cromwell variants than use that. The Cromwell is missing for some reason, perhaps because it would be too mobile, and able to hunt tanks and infantry with ease due to being able to access extra armor, and switch between the 6Pdr and the 75mm QF for taking down defenses and infantry. The damn thing's only flaw was not being on the early landings due to its low fording capabilities, and lost equipment at Dunkirk causing a major hiccup on the UK's logistics.

Ah yes. The tank version of Brandon Herrera.

I find it kinda funny that you didn't react at all to the "Valentine AA Mk I" considering IT WAS LITERALLY FICTIONAL. Yes it was a turret from the Crusader AA slapped on the Valentine hull.

Regarding the limited ammo capacity in Battlefield games, most recent games until BFV were remembered for having a sort of infinite, cooldown-based ammo system like BF3/BF4, but we can recall that the older games like BF1942, BF Vietnam and even BF2 actually had limited ammo for all its combat vehicles and specifically required their crews to return to base/checkpoints to designated resupply/repair points. Pilots in particular had to learn how to land their damn planes safely in order to refit and rearm; at least heli pilots only needed to hover as close to the ground to do the same, but you might as well land and rest your mouse-hand for a bit.

You should have seen the LVT in game, it can have a M24 Chaffee turret on it, a AA turret, and the only as far as I know real turret variant, a Howitzer turret from a M8 Scott

i think the reason they chose the StuG 4 is the "getting in the tank" animation is him opening a hatch to the driver's seat, which the StuG 3 didn't have (at least as visually prominent)

Those videos are still so, so interesting, I love them. Really fun and informative work, keep it up man !

The reason they used the Stug IV is most likely to reuse the Pz IV model. Same with Valintine and Chrurchill. As for why the short 75 gun, gameplay, so everything had these upgrades.

When BFV released the StuG I was so so excited. I then cried when it was a StuG4. The Jagdpanzer 38 machinegun turret was nice tho, and my buddies always made sure to crew it while I drove. Either way, was my favorite AFV to use, and it’s extremely good if upgraded properly

Britain had actually 4 tank roles, infantry, cruiser, light and assault, the tortoise, a33 excelsior and t14 being the most notable assault tanks

I found this video randomly and my goodness this has been quite the watch! Absolutely love your enthusiasm!!! BFV has been one of my few favorite games as well as tanks in general! You've notched a lot in detail and I also learned a lot too!

i expected this video to have like 50k views and i see its only 600. great video, hope you gain popularity more :D subscribed

The Stug 4 was added later in the life cycle of the game, when the Panzer 4 already existed. That way they managed to reuse assets instead of having to remodel the entire vehicle ground up

Hello Eita320, this is the first video I've ever watched from you, courtesy of KZfaq recommending it to me. You mention that the Japanese naming scheme is confusing, hopefully this will get your foot into the door for how their naming system works. The Japanese had long & short designation for each vehicle type, the long names would be for example Type 97 Medium Tank, while the short name would be Chi-Ha. Now a days people will just refer to the tank as "Type 97 Chi-Ha" as seen here in Battlefield V. The "Type" in the name is about equivalent to "Model" for US naming comparisons, and is always accompanied by two numbers; these two numbers are the two last digits in the year of acceptance into service. The Japanese at the time used the Japanese Imperial Calendar, and has the starting year on the founding of Japan in 660 BC. The Gregorian calendar year for 1937 would be the Japanese Imperial year 2597, which is where the Type 97 Chi-Ha gets the "97" from in its name. This system is still used to this day by the JGSDF, however the numbers are now based around the Gregorian calendar, so a Type 90 Main Battle Tank is named on the acceptance into service year, 1990. The second portion is the names such a Ha-Go, or Chi-Ha etc. So there are two name systems the Imperial Japanese used; originally you had vehicles like the I-Go, Ro-Go, and Ha-Go. This system is basically denoting that these are the First, Second, and Third vehicles by using the Iroha musical notes. With "I" being the first thing pronounced in the Iroha poem, followed by "Ro", and then "Ha". These directly translated would be A, B, and C. "Go" on the other hand doesn't translate as nicely directly, and would be "Issue" if translated from 号. This would mean that Ha-Go is A-Issue/First Issue, Ro-Go is B-Issue/Second Issue.... This system was quickly scrapped for splitting each short name into vehicle types; Ke denotes light, Chi is medium, and Ho is Gun tank for example. The Iroha naming system was kept, so whenever you see Type 97 Chi-Ha, what it literally means is that the vehicle is the C/Third Medium and its from 2597 (1937). It should be noted that the dash is important, since there are vehicles that use roman numerals such as the Ho-Ni I, II, and III (Gun Tank - D/Fourth (One, Two , Three). This distinction must be made as vehicles like the Ho-I, the "I" isn't denoting that its the first iteration of the "Ho" as its own vehicle, but in fact the first Gun Tank program (If you can understand what I'm saying). It should also be noted that the year given to a vehicle and the vehicle short designations may not line up, as the Type 2 Ho-I, and the Type 1 Ho-Ni seem to contradict one another, however short names are given upon the start of a program, where as the numbers are usually given on acceptance into service. The Ho-I program for example started prior to the Ho-Ni, but the Ho-Ni was adopted at an earlier service year than the Ho-I. Finally, if you ever see "Kai" attached on to a name, like the Type 97 Chi-Ha Kai, it simply means "Improved". Hopefully that is a helpful, if wordy crash course into Japanese tank designation convention. I enjoyed the video by the way, look forward to more.

I have never really been that interested tanks, but I am really enjoying your longer videos, so keep up the good work, you deserve all the attention this vid is getting!

Man i am so glad i found this channel. Despite your subscriber count you still make some of the best tank content on youtube.

Make a pt2 with the “light vehicles” of the game ie Staghound, 38(t), Greyhound. Also include the exclusive faction tanks you can earn throughout the match.

Due to the fact that both of us enjoy tanks, I shall be subscribing to this channel

Recently found this channel, and I absolutely LOVE your content. Glad to see a fellow enthusiast, not to mention the ATF Winter Combat Jacket. Also anothe gripe with the Sherman's Direct Vision ports. HOW COME ITS ONLY ON THE ASSISTANT DRIVER'S SIDE. Happy New Year to you!

Your excitement for the Sherman shows a true tank enthusiast.

31:32 The British tested the solution with magazines, but after the tests it turned out that the soldier reloaded only slightly faster, but he paid with mobility and the number of ammunition, as a 10-round magazine weighed more than two cartridges with 5 bullets in each. This meant that the soldier had less ammunition, moved slower and carried more weight. To sum up, it was better to use 5-round cartridges than to replace the entire magazines

We need more of this I just found this channel today and I am amazed at the effort he puts into these videos

When I played this game I was actually surprised just how many japanes tanks are represented in this game

This is the first video I've seen by this guy and I think he's pretty dang cool already!

I really liked this video with all the information you shared people learn even more than a traditional history lesson about WW2. I hope you will do a Battlefield 1 tank reaction in the future!

This is a really good analysis, great video dude!

Quality content. Definitely deserve a ton more subscribers. Keep it up, b

The Badger quote after the USA part was hilarious.

When it comes to the sand bags, i have always heard the same from the elders, the shell goes right through, but the sand bags we’re just to stop any ricocheting machine gun rounds or fragmentation into the troops on, to the side, back or front of the tank.

the weird tan for the tiger can be seen in the tank museum on a early semi-prototype tiger 2 used for testing, alongside the fact that it has no markings and is as you said an early model we can assume that it is a pre production test variant

Bf5 was supposed to have the Soviets front but EA ended that for 2042 they also ended battlefront 2 for it.

this is the first vid i've seen of you, but i'm so jealous of your lee enfield and your panzerfaust. imma give a sub !

Dude, I just found your channel, watched a couple of videos, already subscribed! I got a feeling, I'm one of the first fans of a huge KZfaqr, right before he blew up. I'm not jokin', got the same feeling when I started following jshlatt's channel, he had 800 subs at the time I believe.

36:00 as a WoT player, I have to wonder if you’ve played WoT. Modules exist in WoT almost the same as how I understand them in BFV (I haven’t played the game so idk for sure) where your tank has HP but getting hit in a certain spot can cause damage to modules and crew. In WoT, for the modules, you have tracks, engine, viewports, gun, turret ring, ammo rack, and fuel tanks.

So the reason for all the re-used hulls and chassis' was cause DICE just wanted to save money on making lots of unique vehicle models, so they basically recycled as many as they could. This is why we have so many variants of the same chassis or tank hull in game. This is why they chose the StuG-IV cause it has the same chassis as the Panzer IV, and thus saved them money (i mean if you're gonna use a Panzer IV hull, use the Jagdpanzer IV if anything!). And even created some non-realistic hybrids like the Valentine AA (which is literally a Crusader AA Turret on top of a valentine hull).

great video , and i love the bonple poster on the wall behind you

Well I just found u and now u are the first person this year I’ve sub to 😂

I dont understand how you only have 3k subs. Watched the video and subbed, really enjoy your content so far.

Genuinely surprised you don't have more subs, these videos are great!

first time i see this vide, you just pop out on recommended, and i have just fallen in love

Great to see this video! Just popped up in my recommended, and saw the intro and was immediately interested! Can’t wait for you to get around to foxhole’s vehicles! And as someone who stuck through battlefield V during its lifetime, really sad to see that it didn’t get all the content that was planned for it, they cut it short due to lack of revenue. Even sadder that building & the movement didn’t make it in to 2042, would’ve really improved the gameplay there. And if I could add a single game that you might be interested in, it’d be Armoured Commander 2.

Kinda refreshing hearing someone talk positively about Battlefield V, it's FAR from perfect. But it's still a fun game, and retains that cinematic battlefield energy in it somewhere despite all its flaws.

I get the feeling you and Johnathan Ferguson will get on very well xD

Otto Carius talks about the early Tiger models in his book "Tigers in the mud". He talks about how the early Tigers commanders cupola had a hatch that flipped up instead of rotating out. He talked about the disadvantages of that hatch and how it made their profile/silhouette even taller and made for a pretty easy target to take out vehicle commanders. Pretty interesting book if you're into tanks and ww2 history.

Dude your into is so slick, I know I talk about it all the time but… I just can’t help myself. Also you started with the British first so you get my thumbs up! ;)

very cool video, and pretty interesting to listen to; enjoy the sub. i have a single gripe that i wanted to comment on: you mentioned that the german and american armies frowned upon shoving random stuff on the tank, but that's kind of semi-untrue from what I know both the germans and americans independently conducted studies on what happened when you strapped things like logs, sandbags and tracks to your tanks for 'additional protection', and it was found that they didn't do anything at all, and sometimes even made the problem worse (in the case of tracks), as you said. however, in the case of americans (idk about the germans, but i assume it'd be the same), they didn't really tell the crews that, and allowed them to put things like logs, sandbags and tracks on their tanks like that because it gave the crews peace of mind. they didn't tell them that it was useless, but it made the crews feel better about being in those tanks, so they allowed them to have it just so they'd perform better. i believe the british /did/ frown upon it though. so, it wasn't exactly frowned upon for the sole reason that it helped the crews mentally with how they felt about being in that tank. of course, they didn't tell the tank crews it wasn't helpful, and the average infantryman on either side wouldn't have known either, so when they see this tank covered in sandbags, they're probably going to shit themselves a little bit more - tank enthusiasts weren't really a thing back then, so noone knew this stuff. it's pretty interesting to delve into nicher topics like this in regards of tanks in my opinion, which is why i know this. might be inaccurate here and there, in which case, someone correct me please

Thank you KZfaq for recommending me yet another random video that made me quite like, bit saddening to not see any talk of the others like the Wirbelwind, LVT, etc. Hopeful for a part 2.

you earned a sub, this is very bingable content and exactly up my alley

Great Video! As a virgin tank enthusiast, I'm really glad to have stumbled upon this video. I think you missed a couple tanks though... Subbed 👍

New subscriber and really enjoyed the video on this game 👏 going to watch the mention videos

As the only fan of the Churchill gun carrier in existence, I must admit to nobody in particular that I was very excited to see it in a mainstream game spotlight.

Hi I might be late to comment but I just wanted to say I just found your channel and I am loving the content! keep it up!

Sand bags should work against HEAT grenades, like from the Bazooka or Panzerfaust. The Germans put the side skirts onto some of their tanks primarily to protect the weak sides against anti tank rifles, but again, they also work against HEAT.

"Snake launcher?" My disappointment that they were rocket tubes and didn't launch snakes at the enemy

Sandbags were used to counter HEAT ammunition used by handheld launchers like the PanzerFaust, PanzerSchreck and the Bazooka.

Is it that Bonple High School logo in the back. I'm glad someone also recognize that poland school theme

The algorithm blessed me with a masterpiece, can't believe i didn't find out about your channel earlier

What an incredibly edited and put together video

underrated man right here, just liked and subbed on god

Great video i didn't know Sherman has so much different versions , next video i see yours about the Sherman

The imagery of someone reloading a gun and as they pull a new magazine out, insert it, and chamber a new round, all the cartridges (or casings, in this case) are just flying out is hilarious.

This guy got a Panzerfaust in the background. Don’t break into his house unless you wanna be turned into red mist

simply amazing

fun fact the type-59 Ha-Go had a doorbell on the back disguised as a bolt

I really love your chanel, im from Brazil and I don't ever meet someone here that also likes tanks like me... some friends says that I have "tank fetish" because in every game that have a tank... this will be the first thing that I'm gonna rush to have/buy/steal...

15:42 As cool as it would be to think that they did their research for a largely unknown model of the StuG, I have to say that I think it was an attempt at streamlining production of the model for the game based on how the British tanks are just Valentine and Churchill variants.(Except for the Staghound of course)

There was a variant of the Soviet T-26 that had the 45mm canon replaced with a flamethrower.

Just discovered this channel, looks like you have some great content going, I hope you'll grow more subs in the future mate !

Just found your YT Channel and as a fellow Tank Lover I already love your content

10:50 I just wanted to note that I believe alot of tankers did it as a counter to infantry-manned weapons, such as the british PIAT or the japanese "mine-on-a-stick" as they used high-explosive warheads which could be countered by layered armor

i love the idea of jonathan ferguson type videos but focused on tanks

As someone who greatly enjoyed BFV from beta, launch, all the way until they stopped support for it (at peak hype, mind you) it brings me great joy to hear of someone finding love for the game, even after a bad first impression.

I had so much fun playing BFV with some of my friends. The amount of time I've spent on Iwo Jima is ridiculous. Also, I like how some of the maps that was originally Britain v Germany were swapped to US v Germany when the US was added. (I am still mad that we never got an M1/M1A1 Thompson... they are my favorites)

WOWEE! !

Bro got the 303. Rifle in the back bluds about to go toe to toe with tea against those jolly good jerries in the trench across the way

What- Eta, you're a legend, the Night Court theme?! LEGENDARY.

bro is making me want to play BFV again, and this time try to do some tanking. always stuck to medic, which felt really fun to use and support because ammo is always needed. Never managed to figure out the whole tank thing.

my personal take on the anachronisms of that sherman, field repair with parts of whatever other shermans happened to be around.

you've earned yourself sub my guy! happy new year!

A point about flamethrowers on the Sherman: The variant with the turret mounted flamethrower was incredibly rare and saw (as far as I know) only limited service in the pacific theatre of WW2 but mainly later in the Korean war, yet somehow it made its way into mainstream WW2 games, maybe thanks to Company of Heroes (and because it looks cool). The other variant where the flamethrower replaced the hull machinegun carried the flame fuel internally. The variant with the fuel trailer had an externally mounted hull flamethrower - this conversion was done by the British for the Americans, the trailer was the same as used with the Churchill Crocodile.

The sandbags that were added onto tanks actually helped more with artillery shrapnel, shaped charges and mine blast protection (Some crews put sandbags on the hull floor). And the sandbags were quite effective against the 14.5x114mm anti-tank rifles the Soviets were quite fond of, since the hull sides were vulnerable to them in an ambush. Pretty much the same effect as the Schutzen plates on the sides.

@10:25 Im not sure if Germans really put extra armour to protect from tank shells, think they knew that it wouldn't help against large calibre tank shells. They were more interested in stopping the Russian Anti-tank rifles, namely PTRS-41. Almost all German tanks were vulnerable from the sides by this thing, that's why they came up with the schurzen (side skirts in hull/turret) and fitted almost all of their medium tanks with it, PZ IV's and Panthers mainly. Funny, most people have this misconception that the skirts were developed to stop HEAT type of shells which is wrong. Their only function was to give just enough protection to stop the AT rifle bullets. The small skirt was enough to absorb energy off the bullet and make it "tumble" so it wouldn't pen the main armour.

the fact a Sherman with the stubby 75 can damage the Tiger 1 in the game, it makes my skin crawl and my mind race as it is incredibly aggrevating, as it was just not possible.

another reason why threaded barrels work better for hesh (i found out from another video) is that because of the spin, the explosive paste gets spread out more

churchill 7 with square hatch, that's just as bad as the stuff with the sherman