From Newton and Maxwell to General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Dark Matter, and Dark Energy. The nature of fundamental physical laws. My Patreon account is at / eugenek
Пікірлер: 987
@EugeneKhutoryansky5 жыл бұрын
To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available). --To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable. --To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video. --If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.
@juano30003 жыл бұрын
I developed a hypothesis for a Mechanical Overview of Quantum Physics. I would like to send it to you, for review.
@SerVahnt3 жыл бұрын
Time doesn’t even exist nor has it ever existed. Just because we are born into a realm that appears to be decaying and corrupted. Our bodies/temples/avatars are withering away because of sin. Sin will always lead towards rot and filth. Just because the luminaries are in fixed position above in our sky/firmament doesn’t mean time is passing. LoL. Fear is what is destroying our fellow man, lack of proper knowledge and genuine wisdom is what many are lacking today.
@jeminkukadiya56362 жыл бұрын
I love philosophy!
@spiritualconnection3602 жыл бұрын
Hi I have some questions can you respond
@airplayrule2 жыл бұрын
In case youtube deletes my comment before you see it, here it is; 19:18 "Only in the 20th century General relativity and quantum mechanics were discovered" WHAT?? Do I have to give you the Sanskrit word for atoms? or specific time dilation for specific bodies like the polestar in the Vedas? Or are you goona use the word "discover" in a way that your claim here is unfalsifiable, like you did before? Speaking of which: At 12:09 "...to predict the existence of a planet before it had been observed..." But when I said the Vedas mentioned planets, GALAXIES, etc. you said that doesn't count as pre-dating your claims of who the first observer of galaxies were, because those weren't actual observations. So how come here, predicting something without direct observation, somehow counts, and is praiseworthy? Also, our ancient ancestors were MORE advanced in ways WE could only dream of. they had civilizations around for BILLIONS of years, not thousands. and yes, there's evidence for this...assuming you think absence of evidence should be taken as evidence of an absence And isn't it ironic that you accept relativity, yet, act like the Heliocentric model is not equally valid as the Geocentric model??
@wiliextreme8 жыл бұрын
Your videos are awesome, there are not a lot of other yt channels where spending 20minutes is not a waste of time.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+wiliextreme, thanks for the compliment about my videos.
@_Sophisticated7 жыл бұрын
Ha
@frankdimeglio82162 жыл бұрын
@@EugeneKhutoryansky THE THEORETICAL, TOP DOWN, CLEAR, AND UNIVERSAL BALANCING OF E=MC2 AS F=MA: Ultimately and truly, time is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, time DILATION proves that E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. GREAT !!! INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) I have mathematically unified and BALANCED physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 is necessarily AND CLEARLY F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. INDEED, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of the Moon MATCHES it's revolution. Great. It is CLEARLY AND FULLY proven in what is a BALANCED fashion. E=mc2 IS F=ma. In fact, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEARLY proven. It is a very great truth in physics that the ability of thought to DESCRIBE OR reconfigure sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) INDEED, E=mc2 IS DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma; AS time dilation proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, ultimately and truly, time is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. In fact, INSTANTANEITY is FUNDAMENTAL to the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. THE stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. Consider the man who is standing on what is the Earth/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND describes what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. SO, the mathematical unification of Einstein's equations AND Maxwell's equations (given the addition of A FOURTH SPATIAL DIMENSION) proves that E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Look UP at what is the BLUE SKY. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Therefore, the PLANETS (including what is THE MOON) are understood to move away very, very, very, very slightly. Stellar clustering proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Indeed, HALF of the galaxies are "dead" or inert; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AND BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand !!!! Great !!!! By Frank DiMeglio
@fuckthishandlesystem2 жыл бұрын
Remember that it's only a relative 20 minutes and you might be able to pass them more quickly if you move faster or further away from the centre of gravity
@connemignonne8 жыл бұрын
The analogy with Mercury and Uranus was a very useful device. Love your work.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I am glad you liked the analogy and that you like my videos.
@yavuzbahadrtaktak80205 жыл бұрын
There was a Jupiter issue either. Which caused to speed of light calculations.
@airplayrule2 жыл бұрын
@@EugeneKhutoryansky 19:18 "Only in the 20th century General relativity and quantum mechanics were discovered" WHAT?? Do I have to give you the Sanskrit word for atoms? or specific time dilation for specific bodies like the polestar in the Vedas? Or are you goona use the word "discover" in a way that your claim here is unfalsifiable, like you did before? Speaking of which: At 12:09 "...to predict the existence of a planet before it had been observed..." But when I said the Vedas mentioned planets, GALAXIES, etc. you said that doesn't count as pre-dating your claims of who the first observer of galaxies were, because those weren't actual observations. So how come here, predicting something without direct observation, somehow counts, and is praiseworthy? Also, our ancient ancestors were MORE advanced in ways WE could only dream of. they had civilizations around for BILLIONS of years, not thousands. and yes, there's evidence for this (not that absence of evidence should be taken as evidence of an absence). And isn't it ironic that you accept relativity, yet, act like the Heliocentric model is not equally valid as the Geocentric model?
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
@@airplayrule The geocentric model is a valid point of view to describe the kinematics of the solar system, but it would be agony to use it to explain why the motion is what it is. You end up with epicycles upon epicycles, and ultimately end up having to appeal to the heliocentric model anyway to explain the causes of these exotic paths of motion. The heliocentric model is a lot more useful of a reference frame to describe the motion of the solar system, because the sun is a lot closer to being in an inertial reference frame than the Earth, in ways that matter at this scale.
@bhanupratapsinghrajawat5233 Жыл бұрын
@@EugeneKhutoryansky zhfsidixu
@henrywang69318 жыл бұрын
BEST. PHYSICS. CHANNEL. EVER.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Henry Wang, thanks for that really great compliment.
@kartikkaranth26837 жыл бұрын
Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky why don't you collobrate with kuerzgesat both of u are best in science videos
@henrywang69317 жыл бұрын
Kartik Karanth They have different target audience, Eugene physics is more aimed at physics students, and Kuerzgesat is aimed at the general public. Altho it would be interesting if they collaborated.
@commiesbegone25805 жыл бұрын
Phisics are still mostly irrelevant
@erincemrecelikten91255 жыл бұрын
@@kartikkaranth2683 +3Blue1Brown :)
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
If you like this video, you can help more people find it in their KZfaq search engine by clicking the like button, and writing a comment. Thanks.
@Kavetrol8 жыл бұрын
What do you mean by 'it's only approximation' ? There are only approximations in physics. Also, why would you say that Newtonian gravity is incorrect? If you apply Occam's Razor it's more correct than GR for most practical applications.
@Kavetrol8 жыл бұрын
What do you mean by 'it's only approximation' ? There are only approximations in physics. Also, why would you say that Newtonian gravity is incorrect? If you apply Occam's Razor it's more correct than GR for most practical applications.
@Kavetrol8 жыл бұрын
What do you mean by 'it's only approximation' ? There are only approximations in physics. Also, why would you say that Newtonian gravity is incorrect? If you apply Occam's Razor it's more correct than GR for most practical applications.
@Luisitococinero7 жыл бұрын
I'll answer your three questions three times: Newtonian gravity is not correct on its concept. But that doesn't mean it's not useful. Newtonian gravity is not correct on its concept. But that doesn't mean it's not useful. Newtonian gravity is not correct on its concept. But that doesn't mean it's not useful. PS: I'm a computer.
@kikithatsit25327 жыл бұрын
Really i Think the Human can code you.Awesome answers!!
@EugeneKhutoryansky5 жыл бұрын
You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link: kzfaq.info_video?v=DACcyBN5Jng&ref=share You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately. Details about adding translations is available at support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en Thanks.
@sandeepoli75055 жыл бұрын
Nepali
@johnrubensaragi41255 жыл бұрын
Done.
@arisan88114 жыл бұрын
い
@dannieluckeyiii46004 жыл бұрын
In
@mohit47154 жыл бұрын
5:27 Schrodinger's cat taking revenge 😊
@timmy181354 жыл бұрын
And kills kenny
@IsaacGreear4 жыл бұрын
This information is a true gift to those who wonder. Thank you.
@ZalexMusic8 жыл бұрын
the pace of this video is excellent!! really love the work you've done, eugene. you've always had quality content, but i'm very happy to see your production improving as well :)
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Alex Ruimy, thanks for the compliment. I deliberately kept the pace of my other videos slow because people who do not have a strong background in science or mathematics needed time to think about each point before moving on to the next one. I increased the pace of this video because this video didn't have things like complicated geometric models that people would need time to think about.
@fhjfhdgh8 жыл бұрын
thanks alot for this! i almost never have to pause or rewind parts of your videos, it really goes to show how good you are at the combination of visual and auditory teaching! i really appreciate all the work that goes into these animations, they are always so on point with visualizung what is being explained
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+niv skillsurf, thanks for the compliment, and I am glad to hear that you like my animations.
@takkiejakkie54588 жыл бұрын
The existence of this channel honestly gives me reason to look forward to a new year. So much to learn.
@escapethecircle73706 жыл бұрын
These videos are amazing. I hope everyone involved in the production of then is very proud!
@VlanimationTales2 жыл бұрын
I don't know why, but watching this video and listening to your thorough explanation makes me feel satisfied. It's amazing how far we have come and how far we have yet to go! Keep up the brilliant work. 😊
@EugeneKhutoryansky2 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@VlanimationTales2 жыл бұрын
@@EugeneKhutoryansky You're welcome anytime! :)
@shreytripathi56838 жыл бұрын
truly awesome videos by this channel. seen all the videos and liked all of them thumbs up!
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+shrey tripathi, thanks for the compliment. I am glad that you have liked all my videos, and thanks for clicking the like button on all of them.
@mahendransockalingam88196 жыл бұрын
It is an amazing channel.All the theory explained in simple manner and it is very easy to understand.Thanks a lot for Eugene.
@JohnSmith-he5xg6 жыл бұрын
Great analogy about the possible ramifications of Dark Matter and Energy vs the orbits of Mars and Uranus.
@EugeneKhutoryansky6 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@chronitized8 жыл бұрын
you sir have cured my porn addiction through my love for all things engineer! Thank you so much *tear* seriously though these are the best representations of classical fundamental phenomena that I have ever experienced. Extremely well made and the quality is astounding. You are an artist and I know you do not know me but, you have done an insanely grand deed for me and I commend you, please dont stop what you are doing! Thanks for this!
@doggo2065 жыл бұрын
chronitized miss*
@delphini80555 жыл бұрын
I’m just getting cured of my addiction of meat beating.
@lix884400005 жыл бұрын
I'm not cured
@markovichglass5 жыл бұрын
@@lix88440000 When you realize, that the actions to you reactions is so predictable that you then get bored with self 'catering', and move on to learning and help figure out what dark matter is. By watching porn, are you the multiuniverse adding more entropy to the whole system, load after load.
@lix884400005 жыл бұрын
@@markovichglass that's how you deal with jokes, huh? And doesn't matter what you do in life, you're increasing entropy.
@ravindrasahu87384 жыл бұрын
Magnificent work Dr.Eugene! One day I and my friend were talking the same that Biology and chemistry are actually physics. We are a great fan of your Work. We are so glad of your Existence in this Universe. How could I forget Kira Vincent?? I am very thankful to you Kira as well.
@jamesedward93063 жыл бұрын
Absolutely outstanding channel. You are my go to channel. Whenever I'm having trouble with a math/science concept I'm always checking to see if Eugene has tackled it in a video that might shed some light for me. I also wander in from time to time to see if you have decided to address something I wasn't even thinking about, for entertainment. I am never disappointed. This channel is in the distinct minority of channels that keep youtube a valuable web page.
@EugeneKhutoryansky3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the really great compliments.
@Kabitu18 жыл бұрын
Spectacular as always. Keep it up, you're giving us all something new to think about every time.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Kabitu1, thanks for the compliment. Lots more videos are on their way.
@mander401017 жыл бұрын
I am a visual learner, so these videos are very helpful in helping me understand the subject matter. Thank you!
@Mark-Wilson3 жыл бұрын
atoms don't look like that tho tis just for understanding they have orbitals not orbits
@divinemother51385 жыл бұрын
God bless you Eugene, a million times. Such excellent videos makes physics so easy to understand which was never before. Watching all your videos and have started loving physics, the credit entirely goes to you. Thanks a ton.
@EugeneKhutoryansky5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliment.
@yiankes238 жыл бұрын
Great Video, look forward to upcoming videos from this channel. Great content, and amazingly animated.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+alex yiankes, thanks fot the compliment about my video and my animations. Lots more videos are on their way.
@sudheshnapolaggari24987 жыл бұрын
I enjoy them every moment they are very informative and support me in making better decisions..thank you eugene
@klaik308 жыл бұрын
Ive always thought about this :) Nice to see a video of it to get the thoughts going, great vid.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+klaik30, thanks for the compliment. I am glad you liked my video.
@TheChrasse8 жыл бұрын
wonderful video, Eugene! two of my favorite subjects, philosophy and physics, in the same video.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+TheChrasse, thanks. It can be argued that all physics is philosophy.
@TheChrasse8 жыл бұрын
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky That's right!
@carlolisil73453 жыл бұрын
One of the best physics channels on youtube! The visuals and narration are so comprehensible. Keep it up!!!
@EugeneKhutoryansky3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliment.
@rotflmaopmpqxyz8 жыл бұрын
Wow. Definitely the most thought-provoking video yet, thank you so much for creating this video along with all of your others. I am very happy to be subscribed to this channel (:
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+rotflmaopmpqxyz, thanks. I am glad you liked my video, and I am glad to have you as a subscriber.
@waterbottle66442 жыл бұрын
This should be required viewing for anyone studying in physics. I'm in my fourth year of my physics undergrad, and this has Legitimately done such an incredible job at putting into perspective what I've learnt so far, it's helped remind me of why I wanted to get into physics in the first place. Absolutely beautiful work!
@EugeneKhutoryansky2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliments. I am glad you liked my video.
@stellar86896 жыл бұрын
After a few months in my life where I experienced LSD and studied a lot of mathematics in my own time, mostly geometrical proofs, I saw this view of physics clearly. It also enhanced my overall understanding and passion for physics, so my grades in my undergrad increased significantly
@dramese8 жыл бұрын
You put so much effort on this.. And it really paid off, the animation makes much more easier to understand difficult concepts that will no otherwise be fully understand without a lengthy time and energy. I can't believe I can actually have an access to such treasure with no cost. I wish others like me know about this channel. Thank you 👌🏿❤️❤️❤️❤️
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliment, and I am glad you like my videos.
@jlunde358 жыл бұрын
This is the best video yet out of the many fantastic videos you have made. Thank you and I wish you continued success in the New Year.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Jim Lunde, thanks for the compliment about my video, and I hope that you also have a happy and successful New Year.
@Fesenfull8 жыл бұрын
This channel is the best tool for buliding a relational understanding( as opposed to a instrumental one) of physics I've come across. You don't have to answer this, obviously, but have you ever done a interview or something similar(video?), to 'reveal' how you've reached this level/type of understanding? Keep it up!
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Snorre Grimstad, thanks for the compliment. I reached this type of understanding simply because every time I learned a new concept in physics or mathematics, I always tried to visualize it in my head without any equations. These animations are the way I had always visualized these concepts.
@John77Doe8 жыл бұрын
Bravo, very well done. You had Dark Matter, and lots of other cutting edge stuff. You are addressing a very ambitious topic of Unified Field Theory head on. Einstein was just trying to unify Maxwell's Equations for Electromagnetic Fields with his General Relativity Equations. In his lifetime, the strong and weak forces were discovered. So the last 20 years of his life would not have succeeded in producing a complete Unified Field Theory.
@douggwyn96568 жыл бұрын
Actually Einstein had hoped to do more than just unify electromagnetism and gravitation, but those two phenomena were foremost. His general methods are currently used in quantum field theories, including string theory, although they also adopt other principles that Einstein would not have accepted.
@muntee335 жыл бұрын
Doug Gwyn Thats because AB was championed in order to advance a vested interest. Even Field Theory and Electrodynamics is confined to the limitations and requirements for the manner of which, time, motion, gravity, force dominance, fundamentals of matter etc etc. imagine being on the forefront of Field Theory and understanding the reason and dynamics of the approximation given to matter and that approximation is the concept of the particle. But still being absolutely limited to including aspects of this concept into your research and progress while still being stuck with ‘electron particle’ and ‘velocity of a photon’ F’ing useless. Imagine what time dialation and gravity (higs boson ‘particle’ does to the resonant and harmonic properties of a field.... Or trying to research and experiment with field dynamics and not being able to even consider the universe as an open system.... and rubbish like string theory, m theory has to be artificially crammed into rubbish like quantum vacuum and dark energy.
@JimmyFigueroa5 жыл бұрын
Honestly I love the animation and music tones and voice. Very informative.
@MrNaufan2 жыл бұрын
Nice explanations. What a great piece of work. This is the most fascinating video I've ever seen.
@EugeneKhutoryansky2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliments. I am glad you liked my explanations.
@silvianitti44264 жыл бұрын
Field of Application of theories - Great work, always! A little suggestion. As it was already said I would not use the word “incorrect” for Newton's Theory of Gravity and Maxwells Laws of Electromagnetism. I would add an explanation on how each Physics theory is linked to a specific field (or area) of application. So it is not a matter of being correct or incorrect , but it's a matter of how wide is the field of application of the law. The application fields of Einstein gravitational theory includes the application fields of Newton's laws. The first field mentioned is bigger and includes the second one. So Einstein gravitational Theory is more “general”, not “correct” in an absolute terms and neither “more accurate” since the law can’t be separate by its own field of application. More over since Newton's law application field is contained in Einstein-gravitational-theory application field , than Newton's laws are not disprove but are “generalized” by Einstein. As Carl popper wrote “Science is not a system of assertions that are certain or established once and for all, nor is it a system that constantly advances towards a definitive state. Our science is not knowledge (episteme): it can never claim to have reached the truth, nor a substitute for truth like probability... “ To Popper it’s idealistic to look for absolutely-certain and demonstrable knowledge . Thank you for your work
@rh001YT8 жыл бұрын
HI! I think it was a bit misleading to say that Newtons and Maxwells Laws were inaccurate as it would be better to say they were incomplete or maybe say they were superficial, they didn't probe deeply enough. But their "Laws" were very important for research into what if anything lay at a deeper level. But it is probably true or safe to say that scientific explanations have become more accurate. However not enough emphasis was given to the difficulties still at the heart of quantum physics such that it might not be that yet more fundamental laws will be discovered but that there may be walls beyond which we can't penetrate. The part about not being able to comprehend other life forms suggested a wall, so I acknowledge that. However equal treatment should have been given to a supposition that there is no life outside of Earth, or if there is it will be comprehensible.
@ricklujan86705 жыл бұрын
rh001YT ... I actually followed what you wrote and I have to thank you !! ... I was amazed by the beautiful bridge of consciousness and the beautiful juxtaposition of this perhaps
@davidadegboye7735 жыл бұрын
16:26...
@davidadegboye7735 жыл бұрын
Watch the whole video before you comment
@npip995 жыл бұрын
@@ricklujan8670 But, you can't argue that classical theories are correct. They're close, but if the answer is 1.9 and you tell me 2, it's still not correct.
@ishworshrestha35594 жыл бұрын
Ok
@lukasaudir87 жыл бұрын
these videos are amazing, it conveys a peace felling and easy understanding of the universe... thanks for making it!!
@EugeneKhutoryansky7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliment about my videos.
@bhagyesh278 жыл бұрын
All your videos are the only reason i am able to understand the physics and its laws very much. Thanks a lot for such great videos, eagerly waiting for more.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Bhagyesh Purohit, thanks. I am glad to hear that my videos are useful. Many more videos are on their way.
@mayankify6 жыл бұрын
Perception of senses are limited. One can say that there can be something more to perceive which our senses can't perceive.
@theophilus7496 жыл бұрын
The pre-Newtonian mediaevals come in for a lot of stick from those who are unaware of the relevant history. Here is a quote from Jean Buridan, a 14th century French priest, taken from his _Questions on Aristotle's Metaphysics XII.9._ "...after leaving the arm of the thrower, the projectile would be moved by an impetus given to it by the thrower and would continue to be moved as long as the impetus remained stronger than the resistance, and would be of infinite duration were it not diminished and corrupted by a contrary force resisting it or by something inclining it to a contrary motion." This sounds like Newton and the concept of inertia. In truth, figures like Copernicus, Galileo and Newton did not live in an historical vacuum. They had the knowledge they had at least partly from their forbears.
@AlchemistOfNirnroot5 жыл бұрын
Wiki?
@william410175 жыл бұрын
Newton is often quoted saying "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants."
@shreddedreams5 жыл бұрын
exactly .
@paulpalmer60028 жыл бұрын
Love your vids bro, keep them coming! Thank u for making them
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Paul Palmer, I am glad that you like my videos. Many more are on their way.
@student697412 жыл бұрын
I just love these videos. They are very much informative. Thanks a lot for bringing them to us. 🙏
@EugeneKhutoryansky2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliment about my videos.
@pierrelacombe47576 жыл бұрын
Special congratulations to Kira Vincent. Wonderfull clarity of voice permits to me to understand the majority of the explanations, despite the fact that I'm French, and I speak English with difficulties (and with dictionnary) I beg your pardon for mispelling and syntax errors !
@raykent32115 жыл бұрын
Je suis anglais et je peux dire que ce que vous avez écrit là est presque parfait, avec un choix de mots au dessus du niveau ordinaire. Félicitations! Mais le mot "wonderful" s'écrit avec une seule "l" à la fin..... et peut être "with difficulty" (singulier) est un peu préférable dans ce contexte. Voilà, pas grande chose, et je viens de faire plus d'erreurs ici, sans doute!
@HallowedAura06 жыл бұрын
You just got me an A* in physics thanks 😊
@EugeneKhutoryansky6 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that.
@ooraculo2233 жыл бұрын
This was one of the bests KZfaq videos i had see in my life. KZfaq shold give you a award. Your work is incredible.👏👏👏
@EugeneKhutoryansky3 жыл бұрын
I am glad you liked my video. Thanks for the compliment.
@aBrightDarknessHD3 жыл бұрын
I get to watch stuff like this while revising for my Signals and Communications exam. Greatest physics channel ever.
@EugeneKhutoryansky3 жыл бұрын
Thank for the compliment.
@smustavee7 жыл бұрын
I am gradually falling in love with this channel. How can I contact with you guys? I am hypnotized when I watch your videos. Oh! you beauty storytellers of physics.
@PDHo-hl3ld5 жыл бұрын
This channel is super underrated
@srijitapaul50804 жыл бұрын
No.
@saeadabdoli3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your brilliant ideas with folk. I can't find suitable words to describe your works and efforts. I only can say You are awesome.
@EugeneKhutoryansky3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliments.
@kjpmi8 жыл бұрын
I really like your videos. I understand the fundamentals just fine but there's something great about having these videos to refresh your knowledge.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+kjpmi, I am glad that you like my videos. Thanks.
@mucho56568 жыл бұрын
This is amazing. I love the example of learning long addition instead of memorizing every sum combination. I would like to point out that as we discover further and deeper into universe, the more we discover about the history of the universe, BUT not the present. Since the speed of light limits us from looking into others' present. Such as when we look at the sun. We are seeing how it was... 8 minutes ago. Good luck on the future of your channel!
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Mucho, thanks for the compliment, and I am glad that you liked that example. And yes, you are of course correct that we are always only looking into the past.
@TheDcfan018 жыл бұрын
+Mucho Also, keep in mind that there is no such thing as a universal present moment..
@Mak-Monir6 жыл бұрын
What's the name of background music you've used at initial phase during the video?
@EugeneKhutoryansky6 жыл бұрын
All the music in this video is from the free KZfaq audio library, and the names of the songs are the following. Renaissance_Castle Stale Mate Waltz_of_the_Flowers_by_Tchaikovsky
@billmaghan4 жыл бұрын
Best lecture I've seen all week. And so nicely narrated!
@EugeneKhutoryansky4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliment.
@ElieElKhoury198 жыл бұрын
WOW. I found this channel and the content is amazing! Thank you very much the videos are extremely useful!
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+ElieElKhoury19, thanks. I am glad that you like my channel, and my videos.
@JohnVKaravitis7 жыл бұрын
2:30 Here's your "one set of laws" that explains everything: "Shit happens."
@addul19968 жыл бұрын
You're the best :)
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Amer Amodi, thanks. :)
@kenczepelka97945 жыл бұрын
This is seriously one of the very best channels on youtube. Don't ever stop making videos!
@EugeneKhutoryansky5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliment. More videos are on their way.
@divyaarora1584 жыл бұрын
Another amazing video, just loved it! Thanks again for this one
@EugeneKhutoryansky4 жыл бұрын
Glad you like my videos. Thanks.
@GottfriedLeibnizYT8 жыл бұрын
gotta love physics !
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Gottfried Leibniz, everyone should love physics.
@alexandrugheorghe56108 жыл бұрын
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky funny thing is that you can't ignore it. The most outstanding example I could give someone was the following: everytime you go to toilet to sh*t, no matter who you are and on what planet, you are only able to do that because of gravity (curvature in space time of the planet on which surface you are standing on), otherwise your bowels wouldn't work correctly this is the example I give to most people because it strikes them so much that everytime they go to restroom they would think of gravity that they are able to do "rest themselves" cheers Eugene! to a better new year :-) thank you for everything!
@MeteCanKarahasan4 жыл бұрын
This is wrong. You can excrete upside down in australia, or side ways in asia. The gravitic pull does not tell the rectum to work, it is no plant root.
@chiphill48564 жыл бұрын
To say at 2:39 that "we now know that Newton's Theory of Gravity and Maxwells Laws of Electromagnetism are actually incorrect." is misleading at best. It is more accurate to say that these laws have been found to be "incomplete". Indeed, Newton's and Maxwells Laws are used everyday in successful engineering and physics work. These Laws have been refined to more accurate, but they are not incorrect.
@v3le4 жыл бұрын
Newton Laws of are totally icorrect. They only gives an good approximation. Good approximation, easy to apply, conceptually intuitive etc. does not mean it's correct. This is not how the universe works (in terms of springs and cannon balls).
@chiphill48564 жыл бұрын
So, you are saying that Force does not equal Mass times Acceleration? Mathematical proof, please!
@v3le4 жыл бұрын
@@chiphill4856 more precisely F = m(dv/dt) + v(dm/dt)
@megugu21554 жыл бұрын
@@v3le not hating you or anything but do you know any websites where they explain this? i need stuff to learn about.
@megugu21554 жыл бұрын
@@aduantas dug deeper into calculus and yeah F=ma is wrong... if the mass isn't constant. and yes thank you for that reco i might look into it later.
@jordanthijssen77214 жыл бұрын
This is like an advert for physics. A really good one.
@kwgm85782 жыл бұрын
I enjoy the videos. They provide a unique perspective on topics in both classic and modern physics that students will appreciate. My experience as a STEM teacher taught me that students have preferred ways of learning, and my effectiveness depended on my ability to explain course topics in multiple ways. These animated videos can help students challenged with traditional learning tools, like the text book, and the 45 minute lecture. I wish I had these available when I taught, and as a student.
@EugeneKhutoryansky2 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@WiseGuy5088 жыл бұрын
The singular of "phenomena" is "phenomenon".
@b43xoit6 жыл бұрын
Yes and "number of numbers" should replace "amount of numbers".
@fnalfnal92645 жыл бұрын
Wise Guy so what
@fmissark8 жыл бұрын
I miss the little puppy
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Franklin Missark, you can still see him on my Facebook and Patreon pages.
@yashin20688 жыл бұрын
This video was absolutely informative and gave me missed parts of the knowledge. I watched this video in couple of hours, because I thought about the material. Since my teenage time, I have thought about these matters, and I would love I watched this video and your other products 10 or 20 years ago... I am someone who have never accepted or been convinced about whatever I was taught. I was thinking and am thinking something similar to these theories and speculations, but at the same time really different. Personally speaking, the truth of everything will be covered forever, but God one day may make us understood about the all or at least about these matters... I can be wrong or right, who knows. At this point, I am perfectly sure, there are something that we even don't know about their questions, forget about the answers! Thank you
@baskarans25095 жыл бұрын
Your videos are worth watching! They explain the core concept of Physics. Thankyou very much! I am extremely Extremely grateful to you.
@EugeneKhutoryansky5 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.
@Dilophi5 жыл бұрын
Hello @@EugeneKhutoryansky, can you help me with this question? Simultaneously depends of, in which frame of reference you are. And the same goes with lengths. There is no universal Timespace But when we assume, that this universe is simulated, does this mean, there is an universal Timespace. If we stop the simulation or shut it down, then everything in the simulation must be going to halt simultaneously. If we are outside of the Simulation, we could scan the Brains of the people inside the halted silulation and see what they are seeing. One train passenger could see 2 events simultaneously, while a person outside the train sees it non simultaneously. But what is true in the halted simulation? The Train will also appear short from the outside observer and has normal length from the inside observer(passenger). What length does the Administrator of the simulation measure? The Philosophy always search for one absolute truth. But Einstein allows 2 truths. Can be Einstein wrong in a context of a more absolute reality(the world outside the simulation)?
@SciAm148 жыл бұрын
How do you make the animations and using which program
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+SciAm14, I make the 3D animations with the program "Poser."
@SciAm148 жыл бұрын
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky Do you have anyone help you?
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+SciAm14, I make all the animations on my own. The narration is done by a friend of mine, Kira Vincent, who is a professional voice actor.
@SciAm148 жыл бұрын
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky Ok,thank you for your time answering! Appreciated.
@somlata2956 жыл бұрын
It must be hard to make a professional video on your own. I am just speechless about your work, Eugene And the narrating is also amazing👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍🆒🆒
@universe12e6 жыл бұрын
Human atoms and molecules including DNA do follow laws of physics.DNA decides the physical appearance of the creature his expected future if he/she/it live in the same manner that his parents lived once.But if the offspring chose something different then the outcome may be difficult.Example,it is most likely that an offspring of parent having diabeties may likely ot get diabeties but his/her action could defy his/her fate by being more active ,by changing his/her life style.So there is a free will to change his/her fate.This is what we call Fate. and by meditation practice you could apply right knowledge,right actions which helps to change the Fate.So As in ancient Indian texts says that everything's fate is decided but at the same time it is also said that there is free will.One can change his/her/it's fate by right knoweldge,right actions.
@wandrespupilo80466 ай бұрын
I'm so happy this channel is finally getting the attention it deserves, this is the best physics content in yt.
@EugeneKhutoryansky6 ай бұрын
Thanks.
@TehFingergunz8 жыл бұрын
Another great video, Eugene. Keep being awesome!
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+TehFingergunz, glad you liked my video. Thanks.
@CasualSandre8 жыл бұрын
I have a bit of a problem with the saying that "when we study physics we also study the basics of chemistry and biology..." I''m not a biologist so I'm not going to touch on that topic, but as a chemistry student I have to point out that *many* physical phenomenon are actually explained by chemical theory of bonds. For example, the photoelectric effect is a physical phenomenon and can be entirely calculated with a physical mathematical model. But in order to understand why electrons can even be "knocked" and flow so "freely" to begin with, you have to understand the underlying cause of the nature of the metallic bond. Of course at the *most* basic level of the universe such as when you come to the level of quarks you can get away with just pure physics to understand the universe (although even at that level you almost start to enter pure mathematics). My point is that even phenomenon that are entirely physical such as passing electricity through a metallic rod, or stretching a rubber band and releasing it, are only possible due to the laws of chemistry and how matter structures itself. Also, I know it's a technicality but an important one, chemistry is among other things the study of electrons and their innate behavior, and are *elemental particles*, and as such chemistry is just as "basic" as physics. So generally speaking it's a bit misleading to say that by studying physics you also understand the basics of the other sciences. In order to understand the universe you need to understand how all sciences conjoin and give us the full picture.
@andreadedomenico14798 жыл бұрын
Hi, I'm Italian, in our Chemistry books (university books) the first part talks about quantum mechanic, because indeed, phisycs is the base of chemistry and biology :)
@CasualSandre8 жыл бұрын
+Andrea De Domenico Quantum mechanics is merely the name of a mathematical model used by both physicists and chemists. See quantum chemistry: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chemistry
@andreadedomenico14798 жыл бұрын
+The Sandre Guy thanks :) seems like chemistry and phisycs are the same thing, in this case
@CasualSandre8 жыл бұрын
Andrea De Domenico They are interconnected. One can't have 90% of the physical phenomena we know without chemical bonds, and in turn they can't exist without some fundamental physical laws.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+The Sandre Guy, the theory of how atoms bind to each other to form chemicals is a part of quantum theory. Therefore, I think this disagreement is simply a matter of semantics, as what you are referring to as chemistry, I would also refer to as physics.
@HussainAbdi_8 жыл бұрын
Wow. I think this is the first KZfaq video that I have ever liked. Not because I don't like other videos, but because this is the only one that I am proud to like (if that makes sense?). It is really an amazing video and I am looking forward to exploring your channel. Thank you.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+TechnoGeekHA, thanks. I am glad that my video is the first one that you are proud to like, and I hope you also enjoy all my other videos. Thanks.
@digitaltheory45348 жыл бұрын
Your animations crack me up AND help me understand physics. Not many things have that ability! Thank you!
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Josh E. You are welcome, and thanks.
@theuniverse50968 жыл бұрын
This is the ONLY channel on KZfaq which has videos, with the best animation, best content,best explanation and super super super easy to understand. Thanks a lot! I really appreciate it.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+mehvish mujawar, thanks for that really great compliment. I am glad to hear that you feel that way about my explanations and my animations.
@theuniverse50968 жыл бұрын
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky +Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky I must say to you, that all of your videos make everything pretty easy to understand,and rather easy to grasp and remember. I had a few advance papers to write and I had almost given up understanding a few concepts, but watching your videos have made it so very easy. And believe it or not, I even tend to watch your videos for fun (my family thinks I'm crazy doing math and physics for fun!) Hats off to you. I hope you keep making videos. And I shall try to support you the best I can! I hope you make more of videos with slightly mysterious physics topics as their mechanism is harder to grasp. But truly Sir/Madam, your videos are THE BEST!!!😊
@renatofernandes10867 жыл бұрын
Thanks for creating this beautiful video, made my day better.
@EugeneKhutoryansky7 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked my video.
@imyujun4 жыл бұрын
Superb video. Had to watch multiple times and other videos that are somewhat supplement.
@EugeneKhutoryansky4 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Glad you liked my video.
@imyujun4 жыл бұрын
@@EugeneKhutoryansky I love your videos and youtube-liked them to support you.
@cenkersengoz14988 жыл бұрын
If youtube ever gets caught on fire, your channel should be the first to save :) Wonderful content as usual, bringing some nice philosophical insight to the matter. Thank you very much.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+Cenker Şengöz, thanks for the compliment.
@evrardmusic2 жыл бұрын
The visuals of these videos makes the observations surreal.
@wagfinpis2 жыл бұрын
exquisite composition! I am just amazed by this god-send of a channels productions every time! people have a sense of their connections and relation to the multiverse through the experience of their consiousness. we once looked beyond the mundane and prosaic and to the sky and projected the limits of our observational powers of reason, and again in the age of "M" theory we are able to project the reasoning of our experiences of consiousness beyond the Newtonian and deterministic into the orders of the multiverse. I truly love it.
@EugeneKhutoryansky2 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@wagfinpis2 жыл бұрын
@@EugeneKhutoryansky it is very honorable how you represent such a distillation of the minds and work of so many greats and unheard of. universities do not teach students to have visions when emulating the work that Tesla produced. there is a very long and profound history of cultivated consiousness preceding significant developments in the sciences and mathematics. this video is much more tasteful than my more color full bias, that comes from my own experience.
@EugeneKhutoryansky2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliments.
@superjoker68 жыл бұрын
great work guys. keep it coming
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+stefanos kofiras, thanks. Lots more videos are on their way.
@Petrhrabal4 жыл бұрын
As always. Extremly interesting, revealing and creepy as hell :D Good job!
@EugeneKhutoryansky4 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it.
@electronicsinstructor42677 жыл бұрын
Your excellent videos are a great resource for teachers ! Thank You.
@EugeneKhutoryansky7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliment about my videos.
@muneebtarae8982 жыл бұрын
Best physics channel by a clossol margin The way everything is presented just bring another level feeling of physics That was not practiced ever before!
@EugeneKhutoryansky2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliment.
@blake3019878 жыл бұрын
Great Video Eugene. Thanks for making it.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+blake301987, Thanks. Glad you liked it.
@shubhamsingh74058 жыл бұрын
Brilliant! One of my favorite videos.
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+shubham singh, thanks. Glad you liked it.
@TheRomichou8 жыл бұрын
This Channel deserves so much more subscribers! it should be used in schools. we would get tones of new Einstiens, or Hawkings willing to study physics
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+TheRomichou, thanks. Perhaps one day I will have a lot more subscribers than I do right now.
@philosophyphilosophy9034 жыл бұрын
Ma'am I love your videos genuinely.
@MrBazioto4 жыл бұрын
AMAZING VIDEOS... CONGRATULATIONS - YOU DO AN EXCELLENT JOB.
@EugeneKhutoryansky4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the compliment.
@infomage5 жыл бұрын
I loved the video as if it were named "Summary of the history of physics." I think of "philosophy of physics" as being about formalizing (or not) the scientific method and connecting it to epistemology. For example, is there an algorithm or equation that would tell us where there are gaps in our knowledge? Or is there a process that could automatically go from data to a theory? How does math connect to reality? Etc. I think these are active debates, a conclusive answer to which would seriously enhance our understanding of physics. I would love to see your video on those subjects. Thanks for the videos! They are the clearest explanations I've ever found!
@Pollymichaelis7 жыл бұрын
instant subscribe. keep up the good work!
@expressingmyself6846 жыл бұрын
Thank you thank you thank you
@anonymous26094 жыл бұрын
Magnificento! Many Thanks! Please keep rollin!
@EugeneKhutoryansky4 жыл бұрын
Thanks. More videos are on their way.
@peterneilson54345 жыл бұрын
Exelent no silly back ground music and strange noises and explained properly, I enjoyed that .
@programmatore978 жыл бұрын
excellent explanation!! thank you so much for these videos!
@EugeneKhutoryansky8 жыл бұрын
+programmatore97, thanks. I am glad you liked it.
@Guttwistah3 жыл бұрын
Im in love with your videos!
@EugeneKhutoryansky3 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I am glad to hear that.
@PunishedFelix6 жыл бұрын
For those who are wondering why consciousness might not be explainable by physics - think of a computer; a computer can have data represented in its RAM by physical means. But does that mean the objects in memory are actually physical as well, or are they "representative"? Sure, you can destroy the possibility of those objects being represented if you alter the RAM card physically or damage it, but this only means that the RAM can or cannot support the representation of the object itself. That representation could technically be anything, and thus not necessarily constrained to physics beyond what the RAM itself has the potential to represent. Furthermore, our experience with consciousness precedes our experience with the universe. This might mean that consciousness is a means to interact with the universe, but it could also quite profoundly mean that the universe itself is a consequence of consciousness. I should stress that this doesn't change the physics that we observe and is merely a philosophical talking point, but it does show the problems with trying to explain what consciousness actually is in of itself. Great video as always by the way; I just thought I'd explain a little bit since some people have trouble with these strange questions :)
@noob948845 жыл бұрын
er, 'consciousness' is a product of the mind... It is produced by years of experience, from birth .. Animals were not believed to be 'conscious' until very recently... :)