Eurofighter Typhoon vs Dassault Rafale - Which would win?
Рет қаралды 1,361,394
3 жыл бұрынEurofighter Typhoon vs Dassault Rafale - Which would win?
► Subscribe to Grid 88: goo.gl/UYzU9H
Eurofighter Typhoon vs Dassault Rafale - Which would win?
Eurofighter Typhoon and Dassault Rafale are two of world’s most advanced fighter jets. Both aircraft are nearly identical in size, power and performance. That brings us to the question: How do these two fighter jets measure up against each other? Let’s find out in this video.
1. Specifications
Eurofighter typhoon was first introduced in 2003. Around 570 Eurofighter typhoons have been built so far with per unit cost of $117M. The aircraft comes with single-seat and two-seat variants. The fighter jet’s empty weight is 24,251lb and it can take-off with maximum weight of 51,809lb. The aircraft is powered by two Eurojet afterburning turbofan engines, which produce around 40,000 pounds of thrust combined. With the help of these engines the aircraft can gain top speed of 1,550mph. With ferry range of 2,350mi this aircraft can combat within the radius of 863mi. Eurofighter typhoon can climb at the rate of 1,043 ft/sec and can reach at maximum altitude of 65,000 feet. The fighter jet comes with 13 Hardpoints in addition to a 27mm revolver cannon.
On the other hand, Rafale was first rolled out in 2001. Around 175 Rafales are operated by French Air Force and various nations across the globe. At present per unit cost of the latest variant is around $83M. Operated by a crew of 1 or 2, the aircraft comes in at weight of 23,369lb and the jet can take-off with maximum weight of 54,013lb. Rafale is powered by 2 turbofan engines producing 34,000 pounds of thrust combined. With the help of these engines the aircraft can fly at top speed of 1,381mph. With ferry range of 2,300mi, the aircraft conduct combat operations within the radius of 1,151mi. The Rafale can climb at the rate of 1,000 ft/sec and can reach at maximum altitude of 50,000ft. The fighter jet is outfitted with 14 hardpoints in addition to a 30mm autocannon.
2. Maneuverability
The Typhoon has 30 degrees instantaneous turn rate and sustained turn rate of 23 degrees. In contrast Rafale has instantaneous turn rate of 30 degrees and sustained turn rate of 24 degrees...
However, Rafale has better supersonic maneuverability in comparison to Typhoon. In terms of post stall maneuverability, Rafale can achieve 100 to 110 degrees angle of attack, while Typhoon is limited to 70 degrees…
3. Radar & Avionics
The Typhoon is equipped with latest avionics, radar and sensor fusion technology. The latest variant of Typhoon is outfitted with Captor-E active electronically scanned array radar. The radar has a full suite of Air-to-Air and Air-to-Surface modes...
On the other hand, Rafale is equipped with Thales electronically scanned array radar with multi-mode operations. The radar projects real time 3D maps for terrain following and high-resolution ground maps for navigation and targeting...
4. Firepower
The Typhoon has the capacity to carry 9 tons of payload on its 13 weapon stations. An armament control system manages weapons selection, firing and monitors weapon status...
On the other hand, Rafale can carry payloads of more than 9.5 tons on its 14 hard points. The range of weapons includes air to air, air to ground, air to sea, guided and unguided bombs. For a strategic mission the jet can deliver Storm Shadow …
5. Conclusion
Pls watch video till end for detailed conclusion w.r.t. Performance, Air to Ground, Electronic Warfare, Payload, Deep Strike, Close Air Support, BVR and Dogfight.
So, what do you think that which fighter jet is better? Eurofighter Typhoon or Dassault Rafale? Let us know in the comments section. Also be sure to check out our other military videos. Thanks for watching and don’t forget to like, share and subscribe.
FOLLOW us on Social Media:
► Facebook: thegrid88
► Twitter: grid_88
► Become a Patreon
/ grid88
Playlists
► Military, Army, Navy & Air force
• Military
►US Army
• Playlist
► SUBSCRIBE so you never miss another video: goo.gl/UYzU9H
Credits
1) Armée de l'air
2) Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
3) “Crossing the chasm" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
The appearance of Armée de l'air and Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH visual information does not imply or constitute their respective endorsements. All footages and images are owned by their respective owners.
#Eurofighter #Typhoon #Rafale
@simplyevan9135 Жыл бұрын
Im not British, not am I French. But I'd be lying to myself if I didn't say Im absolutely fascinated by the Rafale. The French built, on their own, something that required 4 countries to build. They also found a way to reduce its production cost. That's just impressive.
@Grid88 Жыл бұрын
It's a fact.
@weirdbritishperson9542 10 ай бұрын
Well I mean they did like rob half the design from the typhoon when they worked on it
@steevoy9966 10 ай бұрын
Weird... ur comment show ur ignorance so u better not share it to the world
@foxy4851inactive 9 ай бұрын
@@weirdbritishperson9542 The design comes from the super mirage 4000 which was a prototype made before the mirage 2000 and before the typhoon was even made on paper
@ogamiitto8627 6 ай бұрын
@@weirdbritishperson9542Check your facts, mate !
@peterfeltham5612 3 жыл бұрын
I have to admire the french,they build most of their hardware themselves,from submarine launched missiles to fighter jets to exocet's etc,etc. God knows where they get the money but they manage to do it themselves,using french technology.A proud nation of very clever people.
@Hugo-um8nh 3 жыл бұрын
imagine what we would do with an actual defence budget
@syfury3403 3 жыл бұрын
That for old combat systems, for now, France Bégin to work with other country, like for SCAF and MGCS the country can't finance moderne armement alone
@adriansams6066 3 жыл бұрын
Regarding "God knows where they get the money from" simple answer is they have borrowed it and in January 2020 ,before the virus hit the French debt to GDP was over 100%. It's now around 125% which is not sustainable. Sadly the French Public will not accept cuts to their Pensions,Benefits etc so expect to see the shit flying sooner rather than later in France...
@oo00oo9 3 жыл бұрын
@@syfury3403 France can finance their armament industry. If it wasn't for France cutting it's military budget from nearly 6% of GDP in 1960 to less than 2% in 2019. It's voluntarily that France successive governments lowered it's military spending in favor of mostly welfare spending. Russia is financing their armament industry with comparable GDP to France. Only they give more money to their military expenditures. It's a choice.
@oo00oo9 3 жыл бұрын
@@adriansams6066 what your saying is mostly untrue. The military spending has been in steady decline for the last 70 years.it's less than half the US budget in term of percentage of GDP. Most of the debt comes from the welfare state. France has some mind boggling welfare spending. With 56% of GDP going into public expenditures only 1.8% goes to the military. Compared to the 8.4% of Saudi Arabia or 5.6% of Israel or the 4% for the US.
@Neds_Severed_Head Жыл бұрын
2 really good jets. I'm a Brit, so I'm backing the Typhoon, but the Rafale is awesome and I'm glad it's on our side!
@eddiee1159 Жыл бұрын
Technically ur side !
@Shcvault Жыл бұрын
@@eddiee1159 no, it is. France is a group that’s part of NATO, same as the UK. So In fact, it is on our side, and the Typhoon is on there’s.
@ImWithTeamTrinity Жыл бұрын
You guys should of just built it yourselves, if one nation handled most of the work there wouldnt be so many screw ups. In fact, the reason the Rafale turned out so well, was just that.
@eddiee1159 Жыл бұрын
@@Shcvault uk had the longest fight in the history with france ! Mayle allies but never liked eachother my opinion
@justmrcrow 11 ай бұрын
@@eddiee1159That happened hundred of years ago, Jesus. You need to "grow up".
@peterbrown6382 2 жыл бұрын
I’m British so I will always be in the Typhoons camp, but seriously hats off to the French for being self reliant and virtually creating the same fighter alone. Also the Rafale is spectacular at airshows too.
@black_eagle_7559 Жыл бұрын
it's not the same fighter, Rafale is way better.
@BedtimeStoriesChannel Жыл бұрын
@@black_eagle_7559 No it isn't. Look at the Red Flag reports. Typhoons carry a 4:1 kill ratio over the Rafale's 1:1 against equivalent Russian jets. That's because the Typhoon was specifically designed for air superiority in an interceptor role, whilst the Rafale is omnirole. They're both awesome aircraft and in some areas, the Rafale is better, but in others the Typhoon eats it alive.
@black_eagle_7559 Жыл бұрын
@@BedtimeStoriesChannel proof ? Because when you look at all the evaluation where the Rafale and the Typhoon was, Rafale always gets the best note Oh and i will not mention the ATLC where even the F22 get humiliated by the rafale, 6-1 for rafale against typhoon, 4 draw and 1 win for the rafale against f22, how is supposed to be wayyyyyyyyyyyy better So no, the Typhoon isn't even close to be at the same level than the rafale. Always because of the French Bashing and the fact that we are big dicks when it comes to do some propaganda, you believe that F35 (such a big shit btw), F22, Typhoons are better, but, no, F22 can be handled, typhoons gets rekt, and F35... 1000 billions of dollars for a malfunctionning aircraft, that's sad Anyway look at ATLC, there is even footage on ytb where the Rafale is in the 6 of the F22, look at the evaluation of India, Swiss, Netherlands, South Korea, Singapore, brasil...
@Papepatine Жыл бұрын
@@BedtimeStoriesChannel The typhoon always lost against the Rafale
@010Astroboy Жыл бұрын
The Rafale was copied. Typhoon was the result.
@craigkdillon 3 жыл бұрын
You can buy 4 Rafales instead of 3 Typhoons. Being so close in capability -- getting 4 planes instead of 3 planes is a huge difference
@eyeofthetiger6002 3 жыл бұрын
There's no way the Rafale is cheaper in reality than the Typhoon since the development costs of the Typhoon are borne by 4 countries instead of just 1 and there are significantly more Typhoons being made than Rafales, so the corresponding unit cost per Typhoon will also be lower.
@EvolutionMachinetoMan 3 жыл бұрын
@@eyeofthetiger6002 get ur facts right
@smparreira 3 жыл бұрын
@RogerPierre ... a Typhoon costs more than a F-22 😲
@GruduAlmighty 3 жыл бұрын
@@eyeofthetiger6002 nop, it's wrong, we have same problème with A400M share = price up hard, dont speak when you just think and you have not see.
@vishnus.p.4007 3 жыл бұрын
@@eyeofthetiger6002 How dude?. When it comes to a buyer nation. Rafale is a better deal economically. Keeping aside the parent nations of these fighter jets. You are saying about total numbers in production and that's same right if eurofighters are more in number that's because it's shared by 4 nations & it's buyers. But Rafale alone is produced only for France &it's buyers. There should be some logic in what you are saying right ??? And the maintenance and operation cost is lesser for Rafale.
@nipunkothare 3 жыл бұрын
Rest of EU: bro lets make the next-gen fighter France: I'm good, thanks.
@jujubismuth334 3 жыл бұрын
They all want multirole figthers today :😂😅😓
@etiennerbx5982 3 жыл бұрын
Ye we don't want to find a cup of the hided in our fighters
@manisekhar 3 жыл бұрын
True, 💯💯
@ThePoshPrince 3 жыл бұрын
France wanted to go european at first
@terryforsdyke306 3 жыл бұрын
If I remember correctly (and I was preteen at the time so I may not) most of the nations in the Eurofighter program including the UK, Italy and West Germany wanted a single role air superiority fighter, France wanted a multi role fighter, French left the project to make their multi role fighter, then the Berlin Wall came down and suddenly a superiority fighter was less important so the remaining Eurofighter partners decided to convert Eurofighter to multi role, and Germany slashed their orders because they could no longer afford their full original order now that the affluent West Germany had to support the less affluent East Germany which the USSR had just handed back, which delayed the projects and drove up costs while Germany delayed finalising the design and starting production on the Eurofighter ironically in the name of reducing costs.
@maxschnell2080 3 жыл бұрын
Europe : we’re gonna make the best plane ever together France: hold my baguette
@Fabio-om4kb 3 жыл бұрын
Humour anglish bloqué sur un detail pendant 2 siècles
@amesbancal 3 жыл бұрын
You should renew a little bit your humour
@jerseyforhawks 3 жыл бұрын
Bon.
@mathias_764 3 жыл бұрын
@@amesbancal its a lame joke chill mate
@amesbancal 3 жыл бұрын
@@mathias_764 OK
@dimitrisnomikos8215 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale the best welcome in Greece.. Adore France 🇫🇷
@vincentminier2146 3 жыл бұрын
we love Greece too !
@shashwatgargagrawal7204 3 жыл бұрын
Greece our Friend Love from India 🇮🇳❤️🇮🇳
@BALA-jw7nd 3 жыл бұрын
The actual War starts right in the Comment section..
@Fox-One1937 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah Perfect place to throw grenades :))
@Assassunn 3 жыл бұрын
no war, everybody agree the Rafale is an overall better fighter jet for this period
@julienr8114 3 жыл бұрын
the right place to avoid dead peoples
@imradioactive0309 3 жыл бұрын
@@Assassunn american jets are the best :P
@imradioactive0309 3 жыл бұрын
@Yomangamer agree.
@Grady1ification 3 жыл бұрын
I would choose the Dassault Rafale.
@nezthug2411 3 жыл бұрын
Merci !
@sagardang9585 3 жыл бұрын
That what india did
@arjunpancholy2921 3 жыл бұрын
Tell me your Birthday. I'll send you one.
@discobriscoe5880 3 жыл бұрын
Would you ? Good to know. If you ever become secretary of defence then be sure to let someone who gives a fuck know
@arjunpancholy2921 3 жыл бұрын
@@discobriscoe5880 i just became secretary of Defence.
@walrustrent2001 2 жыл бұрын
There have been approx. half a dozen evaluations of these two (and others) by several countries in open contests (S.Korea, Brazil, Greece, Switzerland, Poland, Holland ...) In every single one the Rafale topped the competition.
@PrefoX 2 жыл бұрын
give us a link then. I saw the opposit.
@010Astroboy 2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely true. The rafale in real combat situations is superior to all comparable aircraft.
@ultron2-465 3 жыл бұрын
Soon the Rafale flies over Croatian air space within the Croatian Air Force 🇭🇷
@bastadimasta 2 жыл бұрын
Buy F-16 instead.
@mikespike11 2 жыл бұрын
@@bastadimasta f35 :)))
@Frosty-vb3vk Жыл бұрын
🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵🥰
@ajinkyalad 3 жыл бұрын
Don't want to talk about performance. But Rafale is beautiful 😍 The french really throw beauty in all their products💯
@SM-nm1oc 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah including racism.
@SM-nm1oc 3 жыл бұрын
Have you noticed the beautiful boxes they used to keep the human sculls of their victims. ! Very cute and elegant
@Submariner92 3 жыл бұрын
@@SM-nm1oc ???
@miked2543 3 жыл бұрын
I agree, the Rafale is slightly more beautiful. I love the air intakes and the curvature around them....still not quite as beautiful as an F-16 falcon though..
@willplanes6441 3 жыл бұрын
@@SM-nm1oc stfu
@nithyaanandha8266 3 жыл бұрын
But most dangerous is PERSON behind the cockpit.
@leschroder7773 3 жыл бұрын
@Charlie K then the ground is an avengers level THREAT
@ujjwalrajput3398 3 жыл бұрын
Behind the cockpit sits radar
@Anythingfunwith_Amber 3 жыл бұрын
I think radar sit in front , fuel and engines sit behind the cockpit or a stowaway can be somehow hiding behind the cockpit.
@akshaypradeep5079 3 жыл бұрын
Engines are the most dangerous??
@SardonianSmile 3 жыл бұрын
@Charlie K or a greek one
@nochatter7134 3 жыл бұрын
Wow France 🇫🇷. Much love from Canada
@roninnovastar1321 3 жыл бұрын
That rafale is just beautiful, supercool looking design !!!
@davidtuer5825 2 жыл бұрын
Lovely colour too don't you think?
@Lowlander-ci7is 2 жыл бұрын
Agreed, I'm British but prefer the look of the Rafale...
@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын
The Rafale is the prettiest of EF and Gripen, probably all jets really. But this isn't a beauty contest, so looks are way down on the list.
@roninnovastar1321 2 жыл бұрын
@@NATObait Of course there are plenty of other planes more capable, just admire the design of the Rafale..
@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын
@@roninnovastar1321 I agree with you Rafale is a beauty !
@bineeshmanoharan7350 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale the real french beauty . Thank u France from india
@A2XETA 3 жыл бұрын
De rien
@ommsterlitz1805 3 жыл бұрын
Typhoon lost all it's dual against the Rafale it's clear that it's not only the pilot fault and Rafale is way better
@A2XETA 3 жыл бұрын
@Druhin Ghosh lol
@elenak5232 3 жыл бұрын
@@ommsterlitz1805 Manoeuvres better! By far!
@Marsang6978 3 жыл бұрын
Thank's ! Merci !
@trexostrexantiros742 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale for Greece and our top gun pilots. Thank you France. We are looking forward to see them in Greece in the summer of 2021. Game Changer!!!
@leroiarouf1142 3 жыл бұрын
@@nekhlioudovbolkonsky2901 ptdrrr
@leroiarouf1142 3 жыл бұрын
@@nekhlioudovbolkonsky2901 je passe en revue notre aviation très cher sujet
@trexostrexantiros742 3 жыл бұрын
@Akula Squadron If Turkey was your neighbor country, you will also wanted Rafale. Our priority (and everyone's priority) is our Nation. Economy follows.
@blackwhite3786 3 жыл бұрын
@Akula Squadron i think you must worry more fore your reading sources and less about my country
@stavrosstamelos6890 3 жыл бұрын
@@nekhlioudovbolkonsky2901 deal
@elberethvarda3611 2 жыл бұрын
The video is great and unbiased. Thank you. Anyhow, we'll mostly never see a Rafale attacking a Typhoon, or else things would get a lot shitty between allies. Both machines were designed for a purpose. Do not forget both countries, France and Britain, were working on the same project. But at a time, Britain's objective differed from France's. An interceptor vs. a multipurpose. We can be proud that Europe's defenses are secure with such machines...
@olivierpuyou3621 2 жыл бұрын
You are right. The main thing is that they are on the same side, the rest is just trivia.
@hayabusa6076 2 жыл бұрын
Hes not only britain
@adventwolfbane Жыл бұрын
Pretty sure they have each been sold to rival nations so there is a chance they could fight.
@badapple2221 Жыл бұрын
just take that in perpective: The UK, Italy, Germany and was it Spain ? all together working on the same project and France all alone managed to make an aircraft as powerfull... Thats absolutely crazy. Just imagine what would France make with as much money as the US
@richardhoyau936 5 ай бұрын
@@badapple2221pas sur . parce que le génie français réside en grande partie grâce au fait que nous avons pas beaucoup de ressources mais nous avons de grands cerveaux
@Nick.Jord. 3 жыл бұрын
Love from GREECE, FRANCE !
@kaykay5628 3 жыл бұрын
Pauvre grecque 👎
@Ad___Astra 3 жыл бұрын
@@kaykay5628 toujours mieux que d etre un paria turk..
@byfaezegev7575 2 жыл бұрын
Vive la Grèce
@d_klem_4730 2 жыл бұрын
🇫🇷❤️🇬🇷
@nlas6136 3 жыл бұрын
Want an omnirole fighter? Get the Rafale.
@Mayank-mf7xr 3 жыл бұрын
deepstrike, dogfight, decoy, scout rafale got everything covered. but still. if i was to sign a purchase, i would request a head to head
@vikrantkothavale8291 3 жыл бұрын
The true multirole is rafale
@carwyngriffiths 3 жыл бұрын
Nah mate, the Typhoon with all its upgrade packages is the best omnirole aircraft in the world.
@capitaineggr9162 3 жыл бұрын
Eurofighter typhoon is **multirole**. It means that it can do anything, as soon as you load it with the desired payload. But in flight, it executes a sole mission, whereas Rafale is an **omnirole** fighter, so it can execute any mission in the air.
@didierlemoine6771 3 жыл бұрын
@@carwyngriffiths no Typhoon is multirole, Omnirole means sea land air carrier and nuclear :)at the same time
@piwi2005 3 жыл бұрын
The planes don't do the same job. Eurofighter is mostly an interceptor. It climbs faster, it goes faster and shot the attacking enemy plane. The Rafale is a better attack platform. It lifts off from an aircraft carrier, goes deeper, engage enemy defenses an strike.
@lordtemplar9274 3 жыл бұрын
@Gb1 lol typhoon is years behind in technology to Rafale and Gripen. Typhoon has a PESA radar and no EW capability. Rafale has had an AESA for nearly a decade and it has Spectra an EW suite that makes it very hard for enmey radars to detect and engage. Rafale proved this vs S200 in Lybia and could fly in first no problem. Typhoon could not enter airspace until Rafale and US Tomahawks cleared the AA defense. Rafale was aslo tested in Slovakia at MACE exercises in 2013 and 2018 vs S300 which could not shoot down Rafale. Lastly Rafale and Typhoon confronted each other 18 times in exercises at Solanzara and ATLC 2009, Rafale won 16 over Typhoon. Militaries also rate Rafale better than Typhoon. In every bid where there was Typhoon and Rafale. Rafale won. The Swiss technical test evaluations were leaked in 2011 and Rafale beat Typhoon in every scenario AA, A2G, Reco etc... Furthermore Rafale beat Typhoon in evaluations for India and Singapore bid. In fact so far Typhoon has never beaten Rafale in any evaluation to date. The only Typhoons that were sold to foreign countries was in direct govt contracts without competition (Austria, Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi) Keep drinking the kool aid. Everyone in the know which is the superior aircraft
@iappreciatethat7184 3 жыл бұрын
@Gb1 Bouhahahahahahahahahaha !
@alejandrolabricot375 3 жыл бұрын
@Gb1 lol , bro we are giving you facts and you are acting like a blind man , the Rafale is better than the typhoon , just accept that , in every combats whiches includes rafales and thyphoons , the typhoons lose in EVERY combats . You're only a frustrated rosebeef , that is seeing that his airforce and roayle navy are doing shit comparing to France.
@mathieu722 3 жыл бұрын
@Gb1 "we won the most wars in 100 years war" Yes, you win most wars in this 100y war. But France win the most important wars, and are the final winner of the 100 years war. So... :) France saved UK ass in Dunkerque. Without France, no "The miracle of Dunkerque" Stay hidden on your island.
@hugoquelquechosecommeca3560 3 жыл бұрын
@Gb1 xD you fight with retreat at the start ? xD we covered you and a lot of french die for you dumbass !
@Alex_K7777 2 жыл бұрын
French beauty in Greek skies. 🇬🇷🇫🇷
@pritishmane 3 жыл бұрын
RAFALE... India's frontline multi-role fighter jet👌 Thanks France for such a wonderful war machine🙏
@pkmkb24-7 3 жыл бұрын
Indeed rafale is our frontline but still Su 30 MkI is spine of our airforce.. Dude we have 260 su30s ... Thats why we proudly say thay we touch the sky wiyh glory
@anshumanpanda1227 2 жыл бұрын
@@pkmkb24-7 Actually, the correct translation is Glory that touched the sky. Though even the IAF uses the other phrase.
@shantanushukla4636 2 жыл бұрын
@FUCK SHIT no sir..india su30 mki havenot that much prob . Bcz our own company manage every thing from engine to wing.but yes sometime part is a headache.we buy Rafale bcz it is state of the art technology like 5th generation..bcz we have enemy like china which operates j20 j31.+ We are upgrading sukhoi to super Sukhoi..fitting new ev suit ,new radar , new weapons.
@udaykamal4621 Жыл бұрын
su 30 mki will be back bone for india until amca is inducted.😇
@samuelammar6932 Ай бұрын
❤🇨🇵🇮🇳
@user-cu1lf4hs6y 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale for Greece and our brave pilots. Thank you France.
@leodehurlevent9139 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks! French people 🇫🇷 love the Greeks 🇬🇷!
@rutube007 3 жыл бұрын
India supports France and Greece. Godspeed.
@dominiquecharriere1285 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale + 1 exocet to get rid off that annoying Turkish boat.
@dominiquecharriere1285 3 жыл бұрын
@frAMKfurt says a Turkish immigrant in Germany... Why didn't you stay in Turkey and help to develop the country?
@megasayajinsongoku99 3 жыл бұрын
@frAMKfurt Greece is top exporter in marble , aluminium , cement ,refined oil, pharmaceuticals etc The greek merchant navy is the largest in the world and a global player . After the economical crisis , Greece had and has an economic growth and important reforms are made. The greek economy is much more healthy and stable than the turkish economy. Don't speak about other economies if your turkish economy is collapsing day by day. As EU members , Greece is part of the second largest economy at the world.
@jinkxer1 3 жыл бұрын
In other words, France abandoned the rest of them and made a better plane, quicker, and for cheaper. Bruh why are you arguing over this, its like 1 1/2 years old at this point.
@Gw0wvl 3 жыл бұрын
The Slower Rafale.
@andrewfield8562 3 жыл бұрын
Typhoon is quicker
@weirdbritishperson9542 3 жыл бұрын
Jinkxer from an intercepter stand point, the typhoon is better, which is what the British needed it for anyway
@antonikubiak5798 3 жыл бұрын
@@weirdbritishperson9542 that’s the point. We should Look at all the war machines from a certain perspective. What really matters is not all in the raw numbers, but we should look at the purpose of the machine. What was it built for? What role was it supposed to fill? What secondary capabilities was it supposed to have? What was it’s place in the general doctrine? Under what circumstances was it built? That’s why some things are just incomparable
@picklewiickle.1583 3 жыл бұрын
yeah sure.. honestly nothing made in france is any good.
@nicolaspeigne1429 3 жыл бұрын
Typhoon was designed as a air superiority fighter, while Rafale is an omnirole aircraft.
@Ad___Astra 3 жыл бұрын
lol, sur le papier le Rafale reste meilleurs même en supériorité aérienne ..
@nicolaspeigne1429 3 жыл бұрын
@@Ad___Astra l'un n'empêche pas l'autre ;)
@NATObait 3 жыл бұрын
@@nicolaspeigne1429 F15 was designed as an Air Superiority Fighter, but Israel showed the world it was capable of so much more. Eurofighter was designed to be an Air Superiority Fighter but it to was capable of being adaptable and can carry almost as much ordance as Rafale.
@daniellippmann7973 2 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile is Typhoon with 3th upgrade also an omnirole aircraft. Was also designed as omnirole. Just 1st and 2nd version where not so far......
@rhysfirth3506 2 жыл бұрын
The Typhoon suffered Mission creep and got larger and more capable, while the Rafale HAD to be small enough to be carrier capable on the French naval carrier. Same with the UK-Fr frigate project that ended up splitting into the French small frigate and British large frigate...
@pkmkb24-7 3 жыл бұрын
France is the best ally ever.. Proud to be its customer .. Best bird ever
@simongardiner6603 2 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@twowheelstouring482 Жыл бұрын
Said no one ever
@lecapitaine390 3 жыл бұрын
France vs others ... * France : Let me do Rafale all alone. The others : shit, they did it.
@VanGoreYT 3 жыл бұрын
Yep and that's the problem. Did French engineers every design something that work? I mean...who prefers setting in a TGV over a Shinkansen? Who prefers a Citroen over a Mercedes? Ok, the Shinkansen is an unfair example, because not only is it a better train, but the Japaners railway personal is actually working and not just striking 180 days a year.
@lecapitaine390 3 жыл бұрын
@@VanGoreYT You are tallking about engineers or about strikes ? Strike ? Ok, you are right. Engeneers ? We can all alone one of best air fighters, TGV we did it alone, atom electricity, bidges, Ariane (with Europe, too expensive for us) atomic submarine... i was meaning we don't need germans ou UK to build new jet airfighter. We can do it, but don't have enough money. Some decisions are political, strategic...germans and UK works for USA. USA want to keep his leadership. example : USA don't want germany to use Russian gaz "northstream" so they are keeping pressure on germans. Then Germans keeps on argueing with French about future airfighter.
@math3148 3 жыл бұрын
@@VanGoreYT Here is the very very frustrated guy. Don't you know that a lot of component implemented in german cars are done by french firms such as Valeo, Faurecia, Plastic Omnium and many other? Don't you know when you seat down in Airbus plane, everything is built up in Toulouse ? I have many many other example. Keep your mouth closed if you are ignorant, you make yourself more ridiculous
@georise922 3 жыл бұрын
@@VanGoreYT Let me gess France probably did something really bad against you... Just the Mercedes case, a big part of Mercedes are powered by French engine... Your comment are just a shitload of hate against France.
@yann.thiele8336 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale is Not all alone As they said in the Video France was in the EF-2000 Project but about when the aerodynamics and Shape of the Typhoon were set they pulled put of the project Without the EF-2000 the Rafale wouldn't be as it is right now
@Speedbird61 3 жыл бұрын
... Both are twin engine. One of the reasons why the French Army didn’t like the Typhoon concept is that its 2 reactor’s inlets were basically together and not well separated as the Rafale concept. If objects were statistically to get into an inlet, the Typhoon would lose both engines because of its front location, while the Rafale would lose only one engine because of its side positions. Also, the French Navy needed to replace the different types of fighter planes it had. So, the Rafale needed to be also an aircraft carrier capable aircraft, which the Typhoon was/is not. Both aircrafts have basically the same flight range (negligible number difference), but the Rafale has a higher combat range than the Typhoon (by NOT a negligible number). The Rafale can carry more armement and a heavier weight of weapons or accessories than the Typhoon. Beside its high altitude capabilities (made for Air “superiority”, which doesn’t make sense nowadays since missiles can do this job) and its speeds, the Typhoon is inferior to the Rafale in most other aspects and missions (due to the omnirole concept of the Rafale, which most common people confuse with multirole concept which is not the same as omnirole). When it comes to price and maintenance costs, the Rafale wins again. The Typhoon is not even comparable to the fast availability (time for inspection) and modularity (change of weapons armement) of the Rafale between missions. When it’s time to change an engine quickly, the Rafale beat the Typhoon and most other comparable modern aircrafts easily. In the real world during conflicts, beside pilots capabilities, the Rafale is a much more capable aircraft than the Typhoon. These differences have been proven in real world operations (conflicts). When a country cannot afford financially to have many different type of aircrafts (like the US) to be able to carry different type of missions, the Rafale should be a no-brainer when it’s time to modernize its fleet, beside politics. The rest is about the pilot’s skill and the supportive crew’s abilities in conflicts.
@xaquko9718 3 жыл бұрын
Also, unlike the Thyphoon, the Raphale can carry nuclear weapons (which is why Germany will be forced to buy the F-35), and its a better bomber and strike aircraft (which is why Spain won't replace its F-18s with the Thyphoon) Greetings from Spain.
@nimaakhtarkhavari8766 3 жыл бұрын
@@xaquko9718 And which plane is Spain getting then?
@17irod 3 жыл бұрын
But can it go boom?
@srpskabalI 3 жыл бұрын
The USA 🇺🇸 has the largest defense budget, and the largest Air Force and the U.S. Navy has the 2nd largest Air Force. I always thought the yanks could afford whatever, given their ginormous defense budget. I wish the yanks would put their F-22’s back into production and sell them to the UK 🇬🇧. The F-22 is by far better then the Rubbish they are selling us right now ( F-35). The F-35 isn’t bad, but it’s more of a ground attack Aircraft in my opinion.
@srpskabalI 3 жыл бұрын
It truly does depend on the pilots skill. A Pakistani F-16 beat some RAF Typhoons a few years back in war games.
@mathiask.5474 3 жыл бұрын
As a Swiss who speak french, a RAFALE is my choice.
@tiber64 3 жыл бұрын
Oui je pense que c’est le choix le plus cohérent aux vus des besoins de la suisse en matière de défense aérienne
@francoism2232 2 жыл бұрын
@@tiber64 Votre gouvernement a trahi, comme le nôtre (belge), en choisissant le F35 américain que leur propre armée critique durement.
@maverickp.s.thundergod.9168 3 жыл бұрын
rafale is state of art. is art also with greek pilots thank you france. for 18 rafale.
@harghartiranga2606 3 жыл бұрын
india have 23 rafeal and 13 is still in order
@dkh8703 3 жыл бұрын
@@harghartiranga2606 Even a tiny Qatar has 36 in order...what you wanna say?
@nafisfuadayon6832 2 жыл бұрын
@@harghartiranga2606 You need 5th generation fighter not Rafale.
@aeroftw5347 2 жыл бұрын
@@nafisfuadayon6832 rafale is 4.5 gen. and we still working on 6th gen
@nafisfuadayon6832 2 жыл бұрын
@@aeroftw5347 You mentioned which country ? Tempest, FCAS or NGAD? I am pretty sure you are not talking about India.
@theodorosmoscharis1468 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale love from 🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷
@52dannyg 3 жыл бұрын
As long as both planes has a comfortable seat I like them both
@nomadUCL 3 жыл бұрын
Plus good AC with a Bose sound system..
@reinaizumi4264 3 жыл бұрын
& bunch o snacks ofc... Lol
@sigma_frenchie4075 3 жыл бұрын
if it doesn't have a cup holder i'm not buying it.
@mmaea Жыл бұрын
and apple plane play
@elendil755 3 жыл бұрын
You forgot: the Rafale can be operated by the Navy from a carrier. Typhoon, no.
@Sedna063 3 жыл бұрын
And for most air forces this is entirely irrelevant.
@elendil755 3 жыл бұрын
@@Sedna063 Yes I admit, I don't give a f*ck about the Zimbabwean Air Force. You should focus on videos about bows and arrows.
@Sedna063 3 жыл бұрын
@@elendil755 Oof, someone being annoyed how unimportant his point is? Most export customers of Rafale don’t have carriers either
@flamma9034 3 жыл бұрын
@@hermes6910 évidemment, le M est le rafale marine xD
@Ad___Astra 3 жыл бұрын
@@Sedna063 so go look on specialized revues, a lot of countries like india are building some aircraft carriers..
@vicemaric9064 3 жыл бұрын
The new croatian jetfighter Raffale💪🇭🇷
@vicemaric9064 3 жыл бұрын
@Twój Ojciec •69 years ago are u dumb or just playing dumb 🤔🙄🤫
@meilanodiris498 2 жыл бұрын
The new indonesian jetfighter Raffale 🙏🇮🇩
@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын
The 'Used' French aircraft for Croatia.
@vicemaric9064 2 жыл бұрын
@PRO GAMER 🕴️ oo u see me🤔 thats another class of dumbness right there my friend
@vicemaric9064 2 жыл бұрын
@@NATObait they are used but still a good choice than overpriced american f16 or underpowered swedish gripen
@alexxela9461 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale all the way. Real omnirole aircraft.
@forzaisspeed 3 жыл бұрын
The Eurofighter is the world's most advanced Muilt-Roll fighter Swing-Roll Fighter. Plus Better Specs and Performance, and can do things that the Rafale can't do.
@sagardyenchilwar8762 3 жыл бұрын
@@forzaisspeedlike?.
@forzaisspeed 3 жыл бұрын
@FUCK SHIT The German Eurofighter is one thing if you look at the RAF Eurofighter's the most advanced version with full upgrades more then the German Italian or Spanish versions the RAF Eurofighter's is the better option.
@forzaisspeed 3 жыл бұрын
@FUCK SHIT 1st The Eurofighter vs Rafale was in 09 it was a T1 Eurofighter, plus that was the only time the Rafale had that amount of wins. 2nd The Eurofighter before and After 09 won most of the games against the Rafale, plus the Eurofighter is the only jet to have won more against all other jets Eurofighter against Rafale vs F-22 Eurofighter won more same with vs SU-27 Eurofighter won more and with SU-30 F-15 F-16 the Eurofighter has won more games against more jet's then the Rafale has. 3rd The Rafale is shit against the Eurofighter again the Eurofighter has won more over the years before and After 09 and better specs / Performance / Air to Air / and Air to Ground capabilities, Rafale fanboy's only have 09 to run to. 4th If not for the Meteor the Rafale wouldn't be as popular the Rafale is a cheap Eurofighter that just can use the same Missile.
@forzaisspeed 3 жыл бұрын
@FUCK SHIT 1st Eurofighter vs Rafale over the years the Eurofighter has won more. 2nd Rafale and Eurofighter vs F-22, the Eurofighter has won more. 3rd Eurofighter and Rafale vs SU-27, the Eurofighter won more. Same with F-15 F-16 F/A-18 SU-30 and so on, plus the RB2 Radar is less powerful then the Captor M in the Eurofighter, the Rafale is a smaller jet but has a bigger RCS at 1m2 vs the Eurofighter's 0.5m2, Faster higher Ceiling Better Turn Rate and can run air to air and air to ground at the same time the Rafale can't.
@thamizhmarai6986 3 жыл бұрын
I would choose Rafale. Consistent specification, design, and implementation.
@raashidmohammed801 3 жыл бұрын
As if we can buy it in market for money
@international_fraud 3 жыл бұрын
@@raashidmohammed801 he said it in a manner of competition
@raashidmohammed801 3 жыл бұрын
Akshay a yeah i know i was joking 🙃
@raashidmohammed801 3 жыл бұрын
Akshay a 🤣😂😄😄
@martialg9425 3 жыл бұрын
@Gb1 aouch sorry mate it was "mirage" with exocet your timeline is off by 20 years ; again sorry
@paulrob86 3 жыл бұрын
You can give anyone a pencil but not everyone can draw. The difference between these two killing machines is the skill of the pilot.
@11Survivor 2 жыл бұрын
Shame that they botched the engine placement on the Typhoon then.
@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын
@@11Survivor you are probably refering to the intakes as the engines are the same as most twin engine jets. The only difference between Rafale intakes and EF is that Rafale has 'fixed' and EF are 'variable' . Of course that means wide open EF can climb higher 65000ft v 50000ft or low level close it and reduce RCS. The intakes let EF pull 9g at Mach 1.2 constantly. The downside is that a hit on the intake is more likely to cause failure to both engines. And it doesn't look as pretty.
@simongardiner6603 2 жыл бұрын
The the Typhoons flown by the RAF will outperform anyone 👍🏻🇬🇧
@jalfrezimonster 2 жыл бұрын
Which is the RAF
@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын
Their are old pilots and bold pilots, but their are no old bold pilots......
@tolispaoki295 3 жыл бұрын
Greek pilots with Rafale .......Game over for all enemies. 💪
@deathtocommies4797 2 жыл бұрын
@H I T L E R f16s are outdated
@siddharthsharma8755 3 жыл бұрын
4 nations combined to build the typhoon while France "hold my Rafale"
@gringologie9302 3 жыл бұрын
Exactly. In case of war, for new planes or pieces you only have to deal with france. With typhoon you have to deal with many countries
@siddharthsharma8755 3 жыл бұрын
@@gringologie9302 exactly
@Ujjawal_YouTube 3 жыл бұрын
USA and its weapon manufacturing companies 'Lockheed Martin' spend alot of money in spreading false information, scam in Rafale deal was part of that propaganda against India so that India comes under pressure and cancel Rafale fighter plane deal and buy American fighter planes, shameful thing was some political party was part of this propaganda to get political benefits... Pathetic
@ranua9327 3 жыл бұрын
@@Ujjawal_KZfaq India is interested in Russian fighters, not american.
@ranua9327 3 жыл бұрын
@@gringologie9302 Well, India has seen the time schedule from Rafale deliveries too long...
@jetaddicted 3 жыл бұрын
The rest of Europe: « We will join forces to design the best jet » France: « Hold my Chablis »
@manisekhar 3 жыл бұрын
@@damnthiccassboye7138 R u kidding?, Don't use that word on a jet who was a game changer in Syria and many recent wars
@simedu444 3 жыл бұрын
France was present at the start of the project but decided to leave because it did not have the same objectives as the other countries, France wanted a multi role which would allow it to have a force of projection on all the combat theaters of the planet and the rest of the European countries wanted a purely defensive air superiority hunter
@simedu444 3 жыл бұрын
@@damnthiccassboye7138 euro fighter have delta wing too... And France participated to the euro fighter project PS We might be silent when we have no knowledge of aeronautics just like you
@simedu444 3 жыл бұрын
@@damnthiccassboye7138 Je te critiques sur tes connaissances en aéronautique et toi tu me renvoies a wikipédia...C du troll j'espère 🤣
@didierlemoine6771 3 жыл бұрын
Typhoon is Airbus military airspace and Rafale is Dassault electronic both r europeans and fit well together for EU defense :)
@rouththami5663 Жыл бұрын
Both are superb fighters, however from the customer's point of view Rafael would be much better bet as it is produced by a single country and not by different countries to avoid many complications connected with it.
@smithsanity2727 2 жыл бұрын
Love the way the Rafale looks but both keys are impressive. Props from America to our NATO partners for making such advanced aircraft.
@redbull5721 3 жыл бұрын
France was ok for the Eurofighter project... Until they saw these awful air intakes...
@zepedrofd 3 жыл бұрын
That statement could be true (just kidding), Dassault used to say: if it looks good, it has to fly good...
@iappreciatethat7184 3 жыл бұрын
@Thijs1888 It's far more convenient this way. If it block during a war, the plane is stuck and has to go back to the base to refuel and repair.
@terrywainman6050 3 жыл бұрын
The rafale air intakes are as ugle as the people that made them. The latest news last week that no one wants to buy the rafale except India, because its to slow, climb rate rubbish ser ceiling rubbish, the jet who gets the highest the quickest shoots first. The rafale is a good fighter for what it was built for air to ground Not air superiority, nobody does dog fighting nowadays the typhoon would have blown it out of the shy before the rafale was aware it was being attacked. The video doesn't go into details of the electronics the typhoons radar is 25% bigger than the rafale, the typhoon as best irst pirate system in the world you cannot hide from typhoon it will detect you and kill you. The upgrades that typhoon as had over tha last few year make it a lethal killing machine not just for the Rafael but any jet fighters.
@randomconnard8338 3 жыл бұрын
@@terrywainman6050 the version bought by india is equiped with 90kn thrust engine ( with AB) the version in this video is with 75kn thrust engine with AB so now it is not too slow.
@grill38 3 жыл бұрын
@@terrywainman6050 stfu lmao
@markocetina2175 3 жыл бұрын
Dassault Rafale for Croatian Air Force ❤
@georgen7467 3 жыл бұрын
Really?
@piter6076 3 жыл бұрын
Ok
@antoniotopcic 3 жыл бұрын
@@georgen7467 yes, Croatia select's Rafale for next fighter jet.
@georgen7467 3 жыл бұрын
@@antoniotopcic well thats a step up
@TheLazarussLedd 3 жыл бұрын
S cime ces platit sa svojim supkom?
@vMaxHeadroom 2 жыл бұрын
This is pretty much the same aircraft as France was initially involved in the Eurofighter programme but they bailed as they wanted a bit more control and a slightly different set of requirements with more ground and support functionality as for the UK it was more of a first line interceptor which could fly fast and high to intercept Russian aircraft. Ultimately both have changed and evolved and are now tremendous aircraft and at the end of the day, it would just come down to who has the better pilot! Good thing we are all on the same side...
@jacktom5476 2 жыл бұрын
it's not the same aircraft at all
@ognjenkuzeljevic1989 2 жыл бұрын
Actually, fights between rafale and typhoon might happen if serbia buys 12 mew typhoons they wanted, and croatia has 12 used rafales soo...
@jacktom5476 2 жыл бұрын
@@ognjenkuzeljevic1989 not an issue, the typhoon doesn't stand a chance against the rafale (yes they fought multiple times in combat training and the typhoon lost both against the rafale and against the US's jets)
@ognjenkuzeljevic1989 2 жыл бұрын
@@jacktom5476 Actually, serbia bought 12 new rafales, so that scenario would be again, impossible.
@jacktom5476 2 жыл бұрын
@@ognjenkuzeljevic1989 this is wrong, Serbia WANTS to buy but nothing is signed or sold.
@TheKeithvidz 3 жыл бұрын
awesome matchup - wasn't expecting the Dassault to come ahead in my preferred battle - dogfighting. I'd pilot Rafale.
@fr4nky4fingers 2 жыл бұрын
Air battles in the 21st century wont have lots of dogfighting though. Hence F35 and ultra long range air to air missiles.
@TheKeithvidz 2 жыл бұрын
@@fr4nky4fingers you have a fundamental misunderstanding Vietnam style.
@fr4nky4fingers 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheKeithvidz enlighten me.
@TheKeithvidz 2 жыл бұрын
@@fr4nky4fingers US commanders thought DF was obsolete and didn't equip Phantom jets with a canon nor train for the close in combat DF requires. Missiles missed.
@valac7820 2 жыл бұрын
@@fr4nky4fingers the famous not finished f35, uncapable plane that can not even defend it self..
@lingesh2773 3 жыл бұрын
l'amour de l'Inde.. Love from India..
@oskar1633 3 жыл бұрын
Love from France 🙏🏼
@Philzemoxe 3 жыл бұрын
Love from France
@etienneetienne8309 3 жыл бұрын
France❤India
@leroiarouf1142 3 жыл бұрын
@@etienneetienne8309 🇫🇷🤝🇮🇳
@crocblancyt2233 3 жыл бұрын
Merci Thank you Gracias x)
@lals8438 3 жыл бұрын
Dassault Rafale🏁
@julien9470 3 жыл бұрын
@Gb1 lol Falklands were 35 years ago. Rafale was'nt even a plan... In the Falklands, Argentina used Super Etendard, most of time just at the limit of their range. They have been able to hit an english vessel with the french Exocet missile... Don't talk of things you don't know...
@Martin-jc8kk 3 жыл бұрын
@Gb1 They didn't shoot down any of the super étendard if I remember correctly. But you're actually saying you're better because you've beaten an army using prop fighters and Skyhawks without spares 30years ago when they've sunk one of your battleship, a ship transporting Harriers, Chinooks... and they've hit your fucking carrier without you knowing until the last moment? Cm'on your facts are just bad.
@malikasad6359 3 жыл бұрын
Rafael is Scrape...
@sigma_frenchie4075 3 жыл бұрын
@@malikasad6359 first, it's *Rafale*, and secondly, no
@tuk4498 3 жыл бұрын
@@Martin-jc8kk regarde des dogfight y a eu un coucous rafale 1 er
@G-2Ub 6 ай бұрын
For now, the Rafale won every single competition against the Typhoon, so the Rafale no hesitation !
@metalikmike1 4 ай бұрын
When the two aircraft were pitted against each other for India, the Eurofighter won every single round of the competition, the reason India went for the Rafale was because it is carrier capable and the Eurofighter is not.
@NickWard-bz4jo 4 ай бұрын
Wrong 😂
@kracao 4 ай бұрын
and you woke up !@@metalikmike1
@kremkrem1511 3 жыл бұрын
I think the Rafale and the F 35 are the two most powerful aircraft in the world after the American Raptor Egypt used the Rafale to bomb a Turkish base equipped with a modern Hawk air system 5 months ago and to date, the Turks do not know who bombed them, how and from where it came ... The most important thing that distinguishes the Rafale is its modern radar and electronic system, and therefore Egypt has ordered 30 more aircraft from France. Egypt was the first country in the world to buy this plane, and then India .... Much love to France from Egypt 🖤🖤🔥
@macakucizmama831 2 жыл бұрын
They are not lol but ok ;) Plus you can not compare 4,5 genetation aurcaft(with 5th) F35, F22 or SU57, even Chinese ones
@SM-nm1oc 2 жыл бұрын
You are a joke..so is the Egyptian airforce...
@europeanzorro4330 2 жыл бұрын
I think that the Rafale is superior to the F-35 too.
@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын
Don't know why Egypt and Turkey would be in conflict so can't believe it is true. F22 and F35 are both more advanced than all 4th + gen aircraft. But SU 57 is not in mass production and lacks true stealth. Chinese have adapted and changed their aircraft so we have yet to be sure of a definitive version though they are building at a constant rate. FCAS and Tempest might go into production or merge with eachother or new partners but 6th generation aircraft are in testing now ( USA ) and the B21 will be more advanced than 5th gen of today.
@muzafferkara8947 2 жыл бұрын
Egypt or Greece is no match for Turkey. The S-400 will shot them all from the sky. And the drone fleet of turkey is the next level in modern war. You see the results in Ukraine Russia war also. 🇹🇷👍🏻
@johnparker4538 3 жыл бұрын
From an air interceptor standpoint, which is most important for UK, the typhoon is noticeably better. As an all round package there is little to choose. Personally I do admire the french for going their own way and supporting their industrial defence base so strongly.
@baptbert043 3 жыл бұрын
Yes for interception the eurofighter typhoon is better because it is faster but the Rafale also has many advantages and is better in bombardment (which is perfectly suited to current missions) and in air combat! Besides, the majority of the exercises opposing these two planes were won by the Rafale! In short, these are two really good planes that have different pros and cons and I wouldn't say one is actually better than the other!
@terrywainman6050 3 жыл бұрын
The rafale is good for what it was built for that's air to ground not air superiority, at bvr the typhoon would anialate the rafale because its to slow its climb rate is poor and its service ceiling is rubbish, as a air superiority fighter you need speed height to get the advantage and the rafale doesn't have that.
@baptbert043 3 жыл бұрын
@@terrywainman6050 Even if the Rafale didn't have this he often won and never lost against a Eurofighter Typhoon in Dogfigth! So even for air superiority the Rafale can compete with the Eurofighter Typhoon because it is more maneuverable even if it is slower.
@terrywainman6050 3 жыл бұрын
@@baptbert043 when the rafale beat the typhoon it was about 8 years ago! The typhoon has had many upgrades since then putting it well in front of the rafale, it cannot bet the typhoon at bvr because the rafale is not a air superiority fighter like the typhoon, the rafale is to slow and can only go to 50 or 55,000 ft which is no good the typhoon can go beyond 65,000ft and climb to that height in 60 seconds. As I've said before nobody wants to buy the rafale except India because of those reasons. Look at all the video's on KZfaq the rafale is always near the back of the list out of top ten fighters. The typhoon now is a omi role fighter its as good as the rafale at air to ground attack and can get to the target faster. Don't be fooled read the proper facts not living in the past saying oh the rafale beat the typhoons! Yes they did but that was eight years ago it wouldn't stand a chance against the typhoon now.
@baptbert043 3 жыл бұрын
@@terrywainman6050 Except you forget that the Rafale has also been upgraded and has a ceiling which is about 1000 meters lower than the Typhoon which is not much! He has a better climb rate and can carry more weapons! And maybe the Dogfigth was a long time ago, but when Switzerland rated the Rafale and Eurofighter in 2019: The rafale got a score of 39-33 for the Typhoon. The rafale is often behind but only one place in the rankings on youtube but because it only takes into account air combat capabilities but the Rafale is more complete and better than the Typhoon in multirole! And in any case level quality / price ratio the rafale is ahead because it still costs less than a Eurofighter while being just as strong.
@jacobsparry8525 3 жыл бұрын
Both Rafale and Typhoons are wicked cool looking air crafts!
@Ginkoman2 2 жыл бұрын
These 2 Aircraft dont even have the same role. The Eurofighter is a Intercepter used mainly as a defender air superiority fighter. The Eurofighter is designed to opperate at very high altitudes (over 30000 feet) at very high speeds and to be highly manouverable in trans and super sonic speeds and mostly fight BVR. The Rafale is an Aircraft carrier based attack fighter. Designed to opperate under 20000 feet and the be highly manouverable at very low speeds. The Main mission here is to be a weapon delivery platform. Carrying nuclear weapons was one of the prime objectives. Its just really stupid to compare these 2
@webcrow2023 2 жыл бұрын
The most important thing to remember is that the Rafale is the only omnirole aircraft in the world and not "multirole". It was designed from the beginning to do it all. In one flight, it can complete several missions when multirole planes must return to their base to receive specific armament at each change of mission. There it is, the Genius of Dassault! As Napoleon said: "Impossible is not French". Cocorico 🐓👌
@alanandconnielast 2 жыл бұрын
Napoleon lost twice and so did the French. The F35 all the way.
@felixlafleurie7856 2 жыл бұрын
@@alanandconnielast Brexit mean Brexit... Well your UK F35... Was an issue last week... Keep yourself to your ego... You are not English.... You are Farage Goons
@foodog3026 2 жыл бұрын
It is an exceptional aircraft...only one or two fighters are better...maybe...
@davidlefranc6240 2 жыл бұрын
@@alanandconnielast f35 is a failure
@alanandconnielast 2 жыл бұрын
@@davidlefranc6240 Hardly...
@Alexander29854 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale for Greece the perfect companion for our Mirage 2000-5
@teslafan9875 3 жыл бұрын
Greeks are famous for their economic deals...but surely it can be a good deterrent against Turkey and its little dictator...
@mustigermandream2475 3 жыл бұрын
@@teslafan9875 turkey needs one week to take Athen :) their 22 mirages will not help them hahaha
@NickAlpha_ 3 жыл бұрын
@@mustigermandream2475 Greece is threatened by a dictator from a country named after thanksgiving bird with pacman for flag...it would be comical if it wasnt real...
@teslafan9875 3 жыл бұрын
@@mustigermandream2475 42 Mirage 2000 more 153 F16 more Rafales...mmmm your statement seeems to be a little optimistic.
@mustigermandream2475 3 жыл бұрын
@@teslafan9875 turkey wouldn't just sit there and look happy if they buy 156 more Raffaels. Turkey would buy an alternative to their other jets Otherwise Greece is not able to refuel their mirages or f-16s They are economical damaged from Europe
@alexandrospanagiotou6251 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale, is one of the best modern fighters, especially for dogfight. Thanks France!
@royalhuseynov5393 2 жыл бұрын
You from Greece?
@zob69420 2 жыл бұрын
Avec plaisir
@ibs8650 2 жыл бұрын
Hey Malaka, Rafale is not 4 dog fight! U don't even know what u bought!!!😂
@dimosthenischouliaras1452 Жыл бұрын
@@ibs8650 hey , mogol of course we know better than you what we bought. Alwatiya brings a bell to you ......
@mrslowne6103 Жыл бұрын
@@ibs8650 False, totaly false, rafale is omnirole fighter and he is the best dogfight fighter.
@kuronyra1709 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale easy. He can climb almost as good as the Typhoon. Can ACTUALLY detect it faster. Is a straight up better dogfighters for Close Combat. He can use more payloads and that is pretty damn important in a combat situation.
@soup5625 2 жыл бұрын
theyre both good jets but they eurofighter does a different job, its an interceptor while the rafale can engage enemies better
@miyahtallulah 2 жыл бұрын
But can't go beyond 50,000 feet. BIG disadvantage. Hugely vulnerable against planes that can.
@soup5625 2 жыл бұрын
@@miyahtallulah someone gets it 🙌
@hasibulhasanhasib1186 2 жыл бұрын
Are you mad!!? The price of two planes is also indicating what's the differences between them!🙂
@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын
@@hasibulhasanhasib1186 Greece paying $250 million for each new jet . India paying $260 m per Rafale .... cheap ?
@Riteshghosh1987 2 жыл бұрын
Both are magnificent high-quality 4th gen fighter jets. Depending on their needs, any country can choose between an interceptor or a multi-role fighter jet.
@clockworkolive8533 2 жыл бұрын
The last version of the typhoon is more a 4,5 gen fighter, Rafalle is a beauty, but i honestly typhoon is superior in almost every way, Rafalle has better price/quality ratio thou
@sosobel5843 2 жыл бұрын
@@clockworkolive8533 nope lol
@sosobel5843 2 жыл бұрын
Rafale is Omnirole so it can do EVERYTHING WITH ONE TAKE OFF and it's normaly a 5th fighter ! But Merican love french bashing and says " nonononon it can't eat that good night it's now 4++ gen fighter !" Bruh... Typhoon is right but Rafale showed that it's stronger so...
@Assassunn 2 жыл бұрын
Rafale is more of a fifth gen jet, especially thanks to SPECTRA.
@PrefoX 2 жыл бұрын
@@sosobel5843 Rafale is 4.0 gen, not even close to 5.0 don't talk bs
@dominationsrebellion6433 3 жыл бұрын
Both fighters looks strong but I d choose Typhoon for loops in the sky and Rafale for wars
@darty58 3 жыл бұрын
I'd choose Rafale for both, it's a wonderful plane, agile like a bird, strong like a nuke bomb.
@jonathansimmons5353 3 жыл бұрын
rafale for pirouettes, and twirling... eurofighter for delivering to the target
@bitterlemon13 3 жыл бұрын
@@jonathansimmons5353 except it couldn't do so in Libya...try again.
@jonathansimmons5353 3 жыл бұрын
@@bitterlemon13 proof not heresay.. you got anything? 3.....2......1........ waiting...
@ZEtruckipu 3 жыл бұрын
Actually, the rafale is a better delivery platform for air to ground mission, and it's electronic warfare capabilities are even better than the typhoon's that was designed as an air superiority platform, giving the rafale an upper hand on air to air engagement. Sorry to say so, but the rafale is better. There is no need wondering why the typhoon is performing so badly on the export market
@hindustanmerijaan1930 3 жыл бұрын
I think Rafale is balanced dominating fighter jet.. kinda a power package.
@jazzmandan50 Жыл бұрын
these two planes are very evenly matched, and i am very glad that they are on our side. great video. thanks.
@sseltrek1a2b 2 жыл бұрын
love these comparison videos...learn so much about these planes...
@sammomin8115 3 жыл бұрын
The only way to know who is better is a paintball fight, so no one gets hurt.
@mnivert5404 3 жыл бұрын
In nato exercice canon dogfight rafale win on the score of 4 0 and 4 1 against typhoon...
@lancelotgohel8460 3 жыл бұрын
Proceeds to make 30mm paintball cannon rounds and paintball Mica missiles *this is where the fun begins *
@sammomin8115 3 жыл бұрын
@@lancelotgohel8460 Great idea! Go for it :)
@bluecaptainIT 3 жыл бұрын
@@mnivert5404 source?
@bunty5520 3 жыл бұрын
INDIA 🇮🇳 WELCOME RAFALE 🙏💝
@seanavp 2 жыл бұрын
*I absolutely LOVE seeing this kind of thing from our friends and allies!* *Some beautiful kits right there!*
@Joker-yw9hl 3 жыл бұрын
Both planes are incredible. For the UK, the Eurofighter is perfect as an interceptor and a very capable plane. But the Rafale is perfect for France, especially considering it can be used on the Charles De Gaulle aircraft carrier. There's no denying that in terms of value, the rafale is definitely the best. But like I said, for the UK inparticular the Typhoon is the better option. Typhoons + F35 Lightening II is a pretty sexy combo
@max.power89 2 жыл бұрын
The same combo like Germany now 💪😉
@NATObait Жыл бұрын
Britain uses EF and F35 Italy uses EF and. F35 Germany is using EF and is buying F35 Those countries know the ability of them both. France is sticking to Rafale and hopes to keep Germany and Spain as partners in FCAS while only wanting 1. Full design Authority. 2. French designed engines. 3. Overall control of the project. 4. A Navalized version. Funny how things repeat. That was the exact reason why it had to go alone with Rafale.
@didierjacob250 Жыл бұрын
bonjour de france. rafale : un seul avion aul lieu de 4 ou 5 un seul moteur, une formation plus facile stocks plus faciles, modularités sur le terrain plus rapide plus facile enteretien sur le temps MOINS CHER pour des resultats equivalents ou supérieurs sur l euro fighter!!!
@simedu444 3 жыл бұрын
Just for information France participated in the development of the euro fighter but left the current project because of its different objectives, France wanted a multi-role aircraft allowing it to have a projection force in all theaters of conflict world and other European countries prefer an air superiority fighter just to defend themself
@arno222444 2 жыл бұрын
And the eurofighter is…..a little bit ugly…..
@davepeesthepool 2 жыл бұрын
@@arno222444 Eye of the beholder I guess... I think its more angular design and leaner profile makes it look graceful.
@DrWhom 2 жыл бұрын
Correct. If all else fails, the French wish to be always be able to deliver a nuclear weapon by jet fighter, come hell or high water... pretty much a kamikaze mission, but _in extremis_ this means that you can never nuke France without at least risking obliteration of your capital city or major HQ.
@colingoichot4245 2 жыл бұрын
@@DrWhom with the submarine fleet icbm capable of France, n country is beyond our reach and nobody can obliterate our whole arsenal before a responsive strike hits which is the whole of nuclear dissuasion
@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын
@@DrWhom F35 is designed for delivery of a tactical nuclear weapon. It will take on that capability in due course. That means all NATO countries deploying it are potentially capable.. UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, Italy, Poland & Germany? , and thanks to Mr. Putin perhaps Finland. UK can deliver nuclear weapons in other ways too Remember using the bomb is not a good idea just a deterrent when all else fails. If Ukraine had kept control of its nuclear weapons then perhaps the war would not have started.
@geeteshkumar566 3 жыл бұрын
You have to deal with 4 countries in buying typhoon or you can deal with France.
@forzaisspeed 3 жыл бұрын
But it's the French you have to deal with.
@suyashmishra552 3 жыл бұрын
@@forzaisspeed We call it france . what tha point 😉
@alexmobil7463 3 жыл бұрын
@@forzaisspeed lol!
@didierlemoine6771 3 жыл бұрын
@@forzaisspeed deal with Germany with restrictif export policy :)
@tonivazquez1081 3 жыл бұрын
Ehhh no. You have to deal with the company those countrys formed. U may have heard of the civilian parts? Airbus? Eurocopter?
@tonyah.960 2 жыл бұрын
Two great jet in the video. I love your KZfaq show. Keep up the very good work friend.!!!.
@didierlemoine6771 3 жыл бұрын
Typhoon interceptor for defence, Rafale omnirole for attack, both very good for EU and overseas territory protection !
@vodkaboy Жыл бұрын
importance is to buy European yes, but buying a plane that you can also use in case of actual warfare and not just flex on diplomats is also important.
@TheSpeep 3 жыл бұрын
Seeing as I'm not a fighter pilot, the performance of either doesn't really affect me much, I just think the Rafale looks better.
@ikramsheraz5538 3 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@jeppeniller1106 3 жыл бұрын
The fafale honestly looks like a facelifted eurofighter imo
@TheSpeep 3 жыл бұрын
@@jeppeniller1106 Pretty much, they do look alike in a lot of ways, but the Rafales sleek curves just look so much nicer in my opinion, its rly just a very nice looking plane altogether.
@dimwitsixtytwelve 3 жыл бұрын
@@TheSpeep when I saw the pilot walking around the rafale it made me think the jet seems much smaller than typhoon. I think both are great looking aircraft however!
@F15ElectricEagle 3 жыл бұрын
Nope. The thing that kills the Rafale looks is the fixed-position refueling prob.
@nolanolivier6791 3 жыл бұрын
Qatar purchased the Typhoon, the Rafale and the F15. One can only imagine their logistical requirements with dread..
@samarkand1585 3 жыл бұрын
They buy their planes with business relations in mind, not war
@lordtemplar9274 3 жыл бұрын
Yes complete logistical nightmare and i doubt theyr are very well trained or intend to use the. They bought them for political goodwill ;)
@georgejackson2488 3 жыл бұрын
For the record the reasons why Qatar purchased three different Multi-Role Fighter aircraft designs from three different nations no less is because of their decision to openly support the Iranian President. Qatar suffered a severe political backlash from USA, and much of Europe over that accouncement. They decide to Diversify to the Maximum by purchasing the F-15E Strike Eagle, the Rafale and the Typhoon so in wartime or any crisis they would be covered. Ultimately of these three nations only France has the track record of providing Excellent Weapons and Spares Support to their foreign nations operating Fighter Jets. Compared to numerous times throughout history of USA and Britain halting arms, delaying shipments, etc. The French are far more realiable any day that the anyone except for Russian hardware support.
@mariamartins367 3 жыл бұрын
@Angsuman Chakraborty yes, the more money you have the less creative you become. I think the French and the Indians share that, we call it « system D », we like to find creative solutions with little at hand, no fuss, no glitz, just improvising , being creative , takingntheninitiative and going for what works for everyone.
@bibinthomas5282 3 жыл бұрын
@@samarkand1585 nah.. its just the oil money,thats the way how rich arabs flex their wealth 😂😂😂
@felipeochoa8260 2 жыл бұрын
At the end, everything is in the hand of the best skilled pilot.
@Dante-cq2zo 2 жыл бұрын
Don't forget the reliability and the maintenance costs topics that are in favor of the Rafale... Also I found pretty bold to say that EF2000 is comparable to the Rafale when it comes to Air to Ground combat. To sum it up, just take a look at how hard it was for UK to bring their EF2000 to combat zone and how poorly effincient they were in Lybia.
@jacktom5476 2 жыл бұрын
everything is in favor of the rafale
@NATObait Жыл бұрын
RAF Tornado was at that time the ground attack option with Typhoon also used and very effective with Brimstone. Gripens also participated in recon missions and also had no trouble with being targeted thanks to its EW capabilities. In fact when the runway was blocked Gripen flights continued from the taxiway. It was a bit of a stretch to claim Rafale was dominant compared to other nations.
@Jay-O_Carlow 9 ай бұрын
LOL so many things are wrong with your statement , Too many to name. I'm not from France nor the U.K But to say That it is bad at ATG is fucking nonsense , The weapons are state of the art and are in the Top 3 of the whole world Any fast jet pilot will tell you that And at Red Flag , Every year it smokes everything bar the F-22 even Fat Amy has a hard time with the Typhoon , It is said to be the Best 4.5Gen fighter its not called the Flanker killer for no reason I love the Rafale but in a BVR fight with 2 pilots of the same skill the EF smokes it every time and that's on Public record , Go to red flag and see for your self but in a Dogfight its down to the Pilots because they are both built as fighters first , Not to carry out CAS Or PS but they made the weapons fit the jet for that job in Iraq well Before Libya. I have no idea where you got your info but its Wrong!
@nisiotisparis2583 3 жыл бұрын
Raffale no doubt, battle proven, maximum maneuverability, hard to detect
@Sedna063 3 жыл бұрын
Likewise Eurofighter.
@johndoe-cd9vt 3 жыл бұрын
@@Sedna063 Nope, the Eurofighter loses everything against the rafale AND the F22
@Sedna063 3 жыл бұрын
@@johndoe-cd9vt False again
@johndoe-cd9vt 3 жыл бұрын
@@Sedna063 the info is everywhere since more than 5 years...
@Sedna063 3 жыл бұрын
@@johndoe-cd9vt Doesn’t make your statement more correct though
@atharvashende964 3 жыл бұрын
I would choose Rafale as both are almost equal in terms of capabilies and Rafale is significantly cheaper.
@vercingetorix1058 2 жыл бұрын
Thyphon ans rafale is very not ah the same cababilities, Thyphon is out of the competition 😂
@paurodriguezriera7979 2 жыл бұрын
Finally a decent argument
@slr150 2 жыл бұрын
Typhoon has higher thrust to weight ratio and higher service ceiling. All things being equal higher ground is an advantage
@paurodriguezriera7979 2 жыл бұрын
@@slr150 Yes, people commenting in this video doesn't realise that. I've even seen comments saying that going high and fast is not important anymore when it's the primary advantage in BVR fights
@Tapo3x 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale intake ❤️ It just looks s*xier❤️❤️
@menadionnassertamtama379 2 жыл бұрын
French initially joined the Typhoon development. They left the project because they knew exactly that they could make better one. Hence Rafale was born. 🇫🇷💪
@FullThrottleRacing535 2 жыл бұрын
They left because they wanted a naval capable fighter
@daniilpostica5967 Жыл бұрын
@@FullThrottleRacing535and also because they wanted an omnirole aircraft, while the typhoon was initially designed to be an air superiority aricraft
@MrAllan9 3 жыл бұрын
Two super fighters, but I would side with the Rafael, the French are clever at building sneaky fighter planes.
@ac4633 3 жыл бұрын
Yeahhh.... in the same quality like they do in car production! Peugeot, Renault vs Mercedes and Volkswagen! How can you expect that their Jets are produced in a much better quality?
@declissonolivier9376 3 жыл бұрын
@@ac4633 I don't know wheer you come from... I hope not from UK. Because car industry for middle class people has desapeared... Not in our country... And Even Morris is now BMW, and so, on... Thank you Margaret!!! And don't tallk to me about VW... Tricking about environment regulations.. Buy a Triumph motorbike...
@ChachouLP 3 жыл бұрын
@@ac4633 no link between cars and planes ;)
@vlepiez 3 жыл бұрын
@@ac4633 And Germans produce top quality fighter jets ?... It's just an ignorant comment.
@debdutnandi2694 2 жыл бұрын
@@ac4633 German cars has horrible reliability compared to Japanese or korean cars.
@SuperStalin1 3 жыл бұрын
Rafael is a combination of beauty and power at a reasonable cost... India choose Rafael and the dragons felt the difference...
@arnaudpayet6173 3 жыл бұрын
Rafale*
@pierreparis6914 3 жыл бұрын
Le Typhoon on dirait la version russe du Rafale. Le Rafale à des formes magnifiques je trouve
@Frenchtoastdesign 3 жыл бұрын
Le parallèle du Typhoon avec une version russe du Rafale et très vrais !
@Fabio-om4kb 3 жыл бұрын
Surtout si c'est pour intercepter des avions Russes lol
@philipsutcliffe6014 2 жыл бұрын
A good video with a commentary that is still clearly audible and understandable above the background noise and music, a quality that is lacking in far too many military themed presentations. Comparing the aircraft is difficult because what is most important is how well they carry out the roles they were designed and adopted for by their ultimate users. I would give my vote the Rafale as I think long term it will be the most adaptable to changes in requirements, and having only one master will make the necessary adaptations sooner.
@rthelionheart 3 жыл бұрын
The Gripen E and the Dassault Rafale are my two top choices!
@streetrider2487 2 жыл бұрын
I show you: F16 w F15EX [ fully loaded ] as back up to your Gripen and Rafale..... hahaha
@sosobel5843 2 жыл бұрын
@@streetrider2487 I show you the Marcel Dassault's Rafale au standard F4 with Meteor missiles
@streetrider2487 2 жыл бұрын
@@sosobel5843 I show you F35 in Beast mode and F22 raptor stealth mode ! :)
@vodkaboy Жыл бұрын
@@streetrider2487 American arm industry reached peak credibility when selling F35 to damn Switzerland. the more I think/read, the more I understand why you guys are so secret regarding the F22 ;)
@onclecryptlord 3 жыл бұрын
UK SPAIN GERMANY ITALY : we will create the best plane FRANCE : hold my baguette
@reidanz989 3 жыл бұрын
Pas compris si c'était une façon de te montrer sarcastique ou méprisant ou de faire le malin c'est franchement bidon Le rafale est le meilleur choix fait en 1986 de produire leur propre projet aéronautique militaire et de lâcher les autres pays sur ce projet. Quand on voit le résultat aucun regrets....Ce n'est que le début des fessées que le rafale met et mettra aux autres avions et en l'occurence à ce fer à repasser qu'est le typhoon ! Allez bisous 😙 😉🇫🇷 💪✌️
@cracnain 3 жыл бұрын
Combat prooven ?
@angelus77300 3 жыл бұрын
@@revolutionariesoffreedom onclecryptlord is right, english german spanish and italian plane
@CaptainDangeax 3 жыл бұрын
@@revolutionariesoffreedom Actually Eurofighter comes out of Messerschmitt studies. 16 frames design were tested. One was choosen to be the best interceptor and enventually became the Eurofighter. This design didn't fit French needs because of too heavy, too big for carrier, and too lame at ground attack. So Dassault came with another design first introduced with demonstrator Mirage 4000, a twin engine Mirage 2000 with canards (thanks to IAF who fitted canards on the old Mirage 3). Get your history right before praising declining UK
@daverutherford6401 4 ай бұрын
Thing is you eat a baguette ;)
@alyours2889 2 жыл бұрын
Love the Rafale...but 15k ceiling differential seems enormous...especially in a dog fight situation... "It's over Anakin...I've got the high ground!" says the Typhoon!
@sonikUk 2 жыл бұрын
RAFALE is multirole , Typhoon is fighter jet
@vodkaboy Жыл бұрын
now I picture Austrian air force gloriously taking down a bunch of Rafale in close range dogfight and it's very funne. no radar ? no bvr ? still no catobar ?
@dglebov 2 жыл бұрын
Rsfale is a better plane.
@trevorsutherland5263 3 жыл бұрын
Even. The pilot would make most of the difference....
@resonance8966 3 жыл бұрын
no eurofighter typhoon is like 3 times better it is even better than F-35
@deepayanduttagupta7842 3 жыл бұрын
@@resonance8966 Before the Typhoon detects the Rafale, The Rafale would already have launched a couple of meteor missiles to end the game. Higher service ceiling does not matter much in BVR combats. Rafale, Typhoon, SAAB Gripen are not used in dog fights.
@deepayanduttagupta7842 3 жыл бұрын
@JUST VIEW IT. If radius determines everything, then why did the old mig21 and mig29 have a kill rate of 9:1 against the USAF in 2004 airforce drill that too against F15C? You can read the article or google it out. The USAF representative mentioned - "IAF is the most lethal force we have ever faced"
@deepayanduttagupta7842 3 жыл бұрын
@JUST VIEW IT. If you are educated enough F16 has many versions. F16 V is phenomenal. Rafale is much better compared to Su30 MKI. You need better education. You don't compare fighters with only degrees.
@goodday381 3 жыл бұрын
Pet are you mad
@rongoodman8874 3 жыл бұрын
Major omission in the video is that the Rafale is qualified for aircraft carrier deployment on French and American carriers. Case closed, it's the Rafale and the design is sexier hands down.
@pierreaugereau9845 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this interesting video. To me, Rafale is better because it is more versatile meanwhile being able to match a F22 during a dogfight. In addition, there is a navy version. This plane is combat proven. I would also say it is cheaper and more reliable and sustainable than the typhoon.
@brimstonebrimstone8617 2 жыл бұрын
Match the F-22 in a dogfight? Are you crazy! Nothing can match the F-22.
@randardoin1161 2 жыл бұрын
I think the "dogfight" with the F-22 would be over several hundred miles before the Rafale pilot even knew they were in a fight.
@DrWhom 2 жыл бұрын
@@brimstonebrimstone8617 much as I like the F-22, its combat record is not great.
@brimstonebrimstone8617 2 жыл бұрын
@@DrWhom any aircraft that goes up against it will lose.
@williamjordan5554 Жыл бұрын
In one exercise, the F-22 downed 6 Rafales, lost once and had 5 draws (ties).
@princevegeta9980 3 жыл бұрын
India :We want 36 Rafale's France: Here you go. India :No we want 114 more Rafale's France :Bruh are you planning to attack the entire planet?
@kaustavkundu6426 3 жыл бұрын
114 were not ordered.
@pkmkb24-7 3 жыл бұрын
@@kaustavkundu6426 just wait until chinese virus susides.. MMRCA 2.0 is done already..
@gr8agrawalankit 3 жыл бұрын
We want more planes to fullfill our squadron offcourse we want good weapon package to defend ourselves.
@kaustavkundu6426 3 жыл бұрын
@@pkmkb24-7 hope so my friend, Stay safe. Jai Hind.
@kiefferfx18 3 жыл бұрын
Only Dassault Rafale is combat proven. Eurofighter Typhoon were only bomb carrier durinig Lybian war. Dassault Rafale"s SPECTRA integrated electronic warfare suite shows for 9 years in combat operation it is a marvelous self-protection system, when the Luftwaffe revealed on 2018 that only 39 of its 128 Eurofighters were operational in 2017 mainly because of the DASS self-protection system which has many malfunctions "
@Sedna063 3 жыл бұрын
Typhoon has been used quite extensively now.... The problems for the Typhoons had to do with a leakage in the cooling circuit and not generally anything with capability.
@kiefferfx18 3 жыл бұрын
@YerffoeG DranoeLRafale is combat proven since 2006, Typhoons has droped most of laser-guided bombs in conjunction with third-party designators like Tornado. Typhoon has no AESA radar in 2020 and is totally overcome by Rafale in air-to-air with RBE2-AESA that allow to launch METEOR at a long range (150 km). Typhoon uses the same hardpoint for Storm shadow/SCALP cruise missile, so when it carries 2 Storm shadow/SCALP it carry no tank when Rafale can carry 2 + 2 tank
@kiefferfx18 3 жыл бұрын
@YerffoeG DranoeL Russian aircraft are scrambled several OTAN countries by norwegian F18, then UK Typhoons, then French Rafale / Mirage 2000-5, then spanish F18 ! And none of them has never an air to air combat with Russian fighters !
@nathanboyea9964 3 жыл бұрын
Speaking of combat proven; Fun fact the F-15 has a combat record of 104 kills and 0 loses.
@kiefferfx18 3 жыл бұрын
@@nathanboyea9964 Rafale vs Typhoon ! Not Rafale vs F-15 !
@donaldjack2530 3 жыл бұрын
By summarising all aspects Rafale is slightly better than Typhoon for a well trained pilot in a real strategic & tactical combat even from an U S aircraft carrier.
@V0YAG3R 3 жыл бұрын
donald jack no
@iappreciatethat7184 3 жыл бұрын
Slightly ?... way better* more like.
@WildMorgan 3 жыл бұрын
I doubt your credentials. If you had anything to do with aviation, you'd know that below 10,000 feet and at lower speeds, the Rafale is more capable. At greater speeds and above 10,000 feet, the Typhoon eats the Rafale alive.
@lam2083 3 жыл бұрын
The Typhoon has better specs and would be so much prepared for air superiority than Rafale, it's well known. I understand that there's many fanatics of Rafale because France sell them to almost every third country military power
@Ad___Astra 3 жыл бұрын
@@WildMorgan speed is useless when u're beated by fox 3 missiles... even if u're turn radius is less efficient.. The times when u can loose a missile with climbing is over bruh, actually more u're cllimbing, more u're detected and it's gonna be difficult to loose a fox 3 if u're to hight cause there is less air at high altitudes so ur typhoon is limited in engine power and not the missile wich is powered by sollid fuel and can reach mach 5-6 ... Soooooo altidude = not a good argument exept if u want to do a survey or travel far without consuming a lot of fuel.
@ahahmarmelade2050 3 жыл бұрын
What they won't tell you, of course, is that Britain, Germany and Spain have already been working on a replacement for the Eurofighter for about 4 years
@DrWhom 2 жыл бұрын
not news, not a secret. development time lines are now so long they are staggered
@FrenchViking466 3 ай бұрын
Lol, you think France stopped developing?
@petergrant2093 Ай бұрын
Um not Germany, Japan
@jorgdahn3736 2 жыл бұрын
We are probably going to need both, in great numbers.
@northindian344 3 жыл бұрын
Good choice Made by Indian's Congratulations France 😇🤠
@lingesh2773 3 жыл бұрын
@Madhujya Burhagohain why do I smell smoke in this comment section?
@tonka7784 2 жыл бұрын
Indian and french allies that sounds powerful 💩😂😂😂
@apamauboikot 3 жыл бұрын
I love Rafale jet fighter....🇲🇾🇲🇾
@shantanushukla4636 2 жыл бұрын
Well when india purchase jets it's the best .and India purchased 36 Rafale ( with indian upgrade like su30mki ) and know on the line of ordering 36 more. Making it second largest fleet of Rafale. Rafale have no match when it comes to multirole fighter. Eurofighter is also a great fighter
@camara1418 3 жыл бұрын
a Rafale can finish its bombing mission and start its air interdiction mission in the same flight, then after 2 or 3 in-flight refueling land on a US aircraft carrier, and its 2 engines can be removed and reassembled in less than 2 hours by a very small team of mechanics. what do you say about
@NATObait 3 жыл бұрын
I think the F35B or C can do that and be stealthier and cheaper to buy.
@goatruthless616 2 жыл бұрын
@@NATObait 😂😂😂😂😂
@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын
@@goatruthless616 Of course you are talking about the 42 Rafale M series, that are carrier capable, built at eye watering cost as opposed to the normal run of the mill. Super Hornet is Omniroll and cheaper . Omnirole isn't completely true as it can do SEAD Missions with Growler that Rafale can't but it doesn't land on water like a Catalina flying boat .... but then Rafale can't either. As for changing missions mid flight Gripen can do that also. So , in conclusion it's called Swing Wing.
@NATObait 2 жыл бұрын
The Gripen can land on a road and be rearmed and refueled by one skilled technician and 6 recruits in 10 minutes. It can change configuration in flight also. What do you think about that CAMARA ??
Growling Sidewinder
Рет қаралды 309 М.
Weapon Detective
Рет қаралды 388 М.
US Defense News
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Weapons of The World
Рет қаралды 63 М.
i_roblox_queen
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН