Is this a horrible idea? Possibly... Are we gonna try it out..for sure SUBSCRIBE Discord Link: / discord Link to the original Reddit post: / yppfliwlac
Пікірлер: 293
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
Happy Thanksgiving Guys! 🦃 Something I forgot to mention is that the chart I’m going off isn’t perfect. There are a few mistakes but overall it’s pretty good
@thatsclassified17 ай бұрын
Great video my guy needed this while waiting for food
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
@@thatsclassified1 Thank you so much that was the plan 😂 But seriously thank you that means a lot
@nakkipate19537 ай бұрын
@@trainingdays can you give us the link for the original post?
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
@@nakkipate1953 oh sh*t my bad totally meant to do that: www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/s/M4zD7xoS9M
@radiomanreal7 ай бұрын
Me 264 or B29?
@mexfu51427 ай бұрын
I know this is unbalaced and unfun but I think this would be great for an alternate gamemode where you have everything unlocked just to try out
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
Pe 8 at 2.0 😂 This is a must
@spe-notapopularytbersus12377 ай бұрын
maybe like a trial game mode where you have 10 battles to test any vehicle in the game
@phenix41957 ай бұрын
Yeah it would gona calm down peopole that are complaining because War Thunder is not Historicaly realistics.
@ussindianapolis4877 ай бұрын
@@trainingdaysAvia S.199 at 7.7. it is useless at 3.3 lmao. i wonder how Sweden, Japan and Israel players would gring their trees.
@jasotpatakasu86737 ай бұрын
Id play it, for better AND worse, absolutely i would have more fun playing 109 vs russia early-war at historical disadvantage than, ionno, whatever. From both sides of the coin Id get more kick out of it. Maybe some april fool Day...
@soha_an7 ай бұрын
taking "realistic" battles to a whole new level with this one
@domanickmartin48307 ай бұрын
"Historic Battles"
@user-qw6es4ly3g7 ай бұрын
@@domanickmartin4830 in order for it to be historical, it should take into consideration how common the vehicle was at the time, not the first day of production. Although it would just erase a lot of vehicles like the comet from existence
@baronmunro14947 ай бұрын
It'd be awesome.
@czerwony14207 ай бұрын
i hope they make one for ground too, would be hilarious to look at how utterly SCREWED all of Sweden's up gunned 1930s tanks would be on 50s-70s battlefield
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
😂😂
@Badger_3257 ай бұрын
Me in my M60A2: "why is there a cardboard box with a 20mm?"
@revan227 ай бұрын
Also remove all prototypes to see just how bad their tech tree actually is.
@sigstenbockgard80807 ай бұрын
@@revan22what? there's 2 prototypes in the entire tech tree
@td23asus7 ай бұрын
Lets not even talk about Italian ground. The Fiat 3000 (modernised and improved Renault FT17) was in service until 1945
@toastymctoastface75327 ай бұрын
I read this post, and it was actually pretty good. for the ww2 section, it does have a few major problems you have to consider 1. For a lot of US and UK aircraft, they are straight up running on the wrong engine settings. Perfect examples of this are the Griffon Spitfires, which should all be running 22 inches of manifold pressure instead of 18, giving them the same engine performance as the current Mk 24, which should be running 25. Same goes for the Bearcat and Tigercat, which are currently running 100/130 octane fuel rather then the 115/145 they ran exclusively. Another good example are the P-51D-5/20, which should be running the engine settings of the D-10, rather then the settings they used to cross the Atlantic. Another example is the P-38L, which is currently 100/130 fuel rather then the 150 it ran exclusively historically. 2. For a lot of German aircraft, their BR is determined by the actual production aircraft while their performance is determined by prototypes. Perfect example Being the K-4, which has engine settings in game based off of a prototype flown in march 1945 using C-3 fuel. 3. For a lot of US aircraft, they are for some reason minor production changes rather then the major blocks. Good examples are the P-47D-22-RE, which has a different water injection button on the throttle and a hydraulic rather then electric propeller hub. The last major razorback upgrade was the P-47D-5, which came off the production line in September 1942.
@Caktusdud.7 ай бұрын
I think another thing to add is the fact that. At least for America a lot of their ww2 aircraft are quite large and heavy. That's because they had more stuff in them. Mainly in durability and survivability. Admittedly I'm more familiar with their naval aircraft. They had things like stronger construction, beefier self sealing fuel tanks, floatation devices, radios, life rafts, armour plates and god knows what else. Yes I know a lot of what I said there are things other nations have as well. Like armour plates, radios and self sealing fuel tanks. However many of the aircraft (fighters really) were quite lightweight and manoeuvrable. The yaks, 109s and zero's for example are lightweight fighters. What this means is that the American aircraft were more or less tougher to take down. Although gaijin designs its damage models around premiums and the game will somehow make a wooden aircraft survive 1000 50caliber rounds for some reason.
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing, a lot of this I didn’t know about
@stink13827 ай бұрын
I didn't know that, ty.
@jurgenh.79807 ай бұрын
Tbh. Its a nice list but the lack of any sources makes this quite a bit useless. How often did specific planes used certain fuels? Was a higher manifold pressure standard across all Squadrons? Where there exceptions? I am not writing this to disprove or whatever. Its just that its always easy to say "yeah this was like that and that happened like this". On well known topics this might be ok. But on lesser known facts some sources certainly help.
@toastymctoastface75327 ай бұрын
@@jurgenh.7980 Source for the griffon claim: Aircraft magazine, September 1945 Source for the bearcat/tigercat claim: AEL-999 Combat Power Endurance Test of Pratt & Whitney Model R-2800-34W Engine. Sources for the P-38 claims: 150 octane fuel initial testing and recommendations & P-38L pilot's manual Source for the P-51D claims: P-51D-20 pilots manual Edit: Source for the sea fury: Sea fury's pilot's notes
@HarryVoyager7 ай бұрын
The 1938 Spitfire is going to be running on low octane gas, so it's going to have a good bit less horsepower than the Battle of Britain bird. And until around 1940 it was using a two blade fixed pitch propeller. So the Spitfire Mk Ia in 1938 is a very far cry from the same plane in 1940. That was one of the things about the engine wars: the gas improvements meant that you could effectively upgrade planes in place, just by retuning the engines and using new fuels.
@Macius1926 ай бұрын
meanwhile Me 163 doing absolute massacre of everything it meets in the air xD
@HarryVoyager6 ай бұрын
@@Macius192 Until the fuel runs out or the pilot melts, whichever comes first...
@kerbol37577 ай бұрын
As a france loser myself I appreciate you for not throwing us under the bus more than once
@vincem94687 ай бұрын
I hope they bring back the realistic line up events. Like the Pearl Harbor event which has f4fs vs a6ms. It was tough for us but I enjoyed it regardless. It also insecticides people to get planes from other tech trees.
@skyscall7 ай бұрын
The worst uptiered plane would probably be the Q-5L, which is a ground attack platform from *2002* which in-game fights 1950s jets. To be fair though, the Q-5 in War Thunder is missing a _significant_ amount of it's armament, including _all_ of it's missile and countermeasure options in real life. It'd fit a lot more against modern planes if it actually had it's modern year 2000 equipment.
@foczastafomka55027 ай бұрын
aw yeah baby boutta be ballin with the 11.3 mig 19
@KekusMagnus7 ай бұрын
It's not a fighter so it doesn't matter
@brentonherbert77757 ай бұрын
Because the Q5 suffers sooooo much in its current setting even as is? Ground attackers being the best fighters is an annoying trend in this game.
@---capybara---7 ай бұрын
@@brentonherbert7775the q5-l is the worst attacker in its rank IMO, speaking as someone who actually grinded the tree, it has NO A2A missiles, NO flares, and is on a dated airframe. It is TERRIBLE.
@skyscall7 ай бұрын
@@brentonherbert7775 I'd much rather prefer a historically-accurate Q-5L with missiles and flares at 10.7 than what it is now at 9.7.
@tenpotkan70517 ай бұрын
Not only should the BR be based on production year, or more speciffically on the year the airplanes were introduced, but the uptier limit for each aircraft should be set depending on the year it was retired.
@BrockvsTV7 ай бұрын
I know it’s breaks a lot of things but I do love some of the br decompression in some areas. I kind of wish it went by decades. 1930’s, 1940’s, 1950’s, 1960’s, 1970’s, 1980’s to modern. Still has plenty of problems and doesn’t work for naval but atleast decades instead of years gives more wiggle room. I just want more split between technology so that certain tiers have more flavor again or just time before their counters. Would give heavy tanks, early Jets, and late props some better chances
@user-fe7bo5mm1o7 ай бұрын
this would be bad for minor nations, but i do agree
@BrockvsTV7 ай бұрын
@@user-fe7bo5mm1o agreed. Specific years would be bad I I’d hope decade would give enough wiggle room. 40’s are not the best fir France but the 60’s are good. Italy and Japan are pretty sparse though. But maybe 10 year spread would barely be enjoy
@jordithefox27867 ай бұрын
Maybe instead of it being a static 10 year limit all around, the higher the rank the greater the year limit gap. For example (just throwing random baseless numbers for now) ranks 1-3 couldn't face anything outside of their decade but rank 4-5 get a 15 year limit, 6-7 gets 20/30 ish. Still probably has plenty issues I'm sure
@BrockvsTV7 ай бұрын
@@jordithefox2786 that might work. Right now anything after 5.0 kind of needs decompression so bigger gaps starting at like 4.0 currently would help
@artruisjoew54737 ай бұрын
Lol 60s and 70s sun be such a hilarious club fest for the US. 60s: F4J (with AIM7Es) vs early fishbeds, or the 4C fighting first production mig21s and MiG 19s, lmao. 70s: tomcat and eagles dunking on everything.
@Elitex627 ай бұрын
I agree with America's placement at A-tier for WW2, but for different reasons. I think you're sleeping on WW2 American aircraft. Sure, the image makes them SEEM like they're fucked over, but Gaijin decides BR by player stats and the only thing worse than a German Main is an America Main.
@samm17_7 ай бұрын
surprising amount of production quality for 400 views, good video my man
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
I appreciate that so much, thank you!
@PTK8187 ай бұрын
30k babay!!
@humanperson90497 ай бұрын
Been waiting for something like this for a while, great video and would be awesome if you or someone made this but for ground vehicles.
@DDayJayke7 ай бұрын
A Pe-8 at 2.0 should be evidence enough. Imagine just starting the game, and your team is wiped out cause a Pe-8 is flying around uncontested the entire match.
@fordunfocus7 ай бұрын
Didn't expect such a well made video, for real. Great video!
@jackgamer63077 ай бұрын
It's a shame that mechanics like "random transmission explosion", "fuel shortage", and "pilot liquification" aren't modelled in game. Their absence gives germany an ahistoric edge
@Oookkaa7 ай бұрын
A-10 to 12.0 sounds balanced to me. Fuck the no skill 4x aim9L free kill launcher.
@marcusborderlands61777 ай бұрын
I feel like the hunters are criminally underrated. Literslly my favorite jets to fly in the game.
@Leefjuice40057 ай бұрын
I believe British trees are just challenging making them a perfect nation to play if u wanna be competitive and sweaty player (and improves yo skill with trial and error)
@hedgeearthridge68077 ай бұрын
Oh totally, using non-APHE rounds seriously teaches you to aim for components and learn the enemy tanks. Starting off with Swedish APDS, American 37mm, and British 2pdr and 6pdr really made me improve at the game
@stalker52997 ай бұрын
the only complaint i have really, is the pain that was caused when you got to postwar france and showed a RAF Hunter
@appa6097 ай бұрын
This should be a game mode
@RedVRCC7 ай бұрын
I've hosted custom battles with my discord server that use historically accurate time frames. It's fairly unbalanced but I also simulate logistics on each side as well so inferior Soviet and American equipment is more numerous. I also did a cold war scenario which ended up being quite unbalanced as well. Fulda gap soviet rush with BMP-1s and T-64/72s against leopard and M60 defenders.
@yuiopfgaming7 ай бұрын
Good vid bro hope you get those 20k
@chloesilverwolf7397 ай бұрын
It pains me how horribly underserved a lot of the British aircraft are in terms of how they perform in game compared to their irl counterparts
@joekrafft71257 ай бұрын
i would argue that with those 20mm i16s that they “exist” strictly because they had 1 or 2 in russia. the i16 that did see combat extensively was the 2 machine gun varient. the 4 or the 20mm variants were mostly experimental and didn’t truly see combat
@RedHeavy-7 ай бұрын
This video gonna blow up calling it rn.
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
🤞🏼
@PTK8187 ай бұрын
Called it indeed!
@cynthiahatterene67397 ай бұрын
Very interesting video idea and fun and entertaining to watch as well. Even tho I don't play the air modes and don't particularly care for planes. Would love to see a video like this for the ground portion as well as that's what I primarily play
@dvdexe697 ай бұрын
we NEED a tank version.
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
DESPERATELY
@Sansarii_Minecraft7 ай бұрын
another s-tier ww2 Germany I'd think
@therealgaben55277 ай бұрын
@@Sansarii_Minecraftreal. But when you remove the effects of reliability, crew experience, cost, *infantry existing*, Mud existing, and logistics, it definitely favors the Germans(just saying this for the wheraboos out there).
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
Idk why I laughed so hard at “infantry existing” 😂😂 thanks for that
@tovarisch81807 ай бұрын
,,We need historical battle ratings'' wehraboos when they have to face a KV-1 at 1.7-2.3 in their Panzer III: 💀
@neromastic45127 ай бұрын
Well that's a phenomenal Video and the Person who made that List Hope to see them add more when more vehicles come to the game. And eventually maybe see the Tanks get such Historical accurate Tree as well in the future.
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@Westwoodshadowgaming7 ай бұрын
Reading the comments has torn up my mental health too. Gl homie. Great video! TBH this mae me kinda want historic battles now. Getting to see the planes use the tactics they were made for sounds awesome!
@lenny_13697 ай бұрын
this is pretty interesting, can you do one for tanks?
@nakkipate19537 ай бұрын
This would be so fun as some event
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
Now I need a dedicated video testing this out in game 😂
@dupond9487 ай бұрын
it would be interesting to be able to play like that but as a separate progression from the normal game
@alb7917 ай бұрын
Pe-8 in 2.0 feels like the "Nuclear bomb vs coughing baby" meme
@conradyates73407 ай бұрын
Not the B-29s actually being able to get to the bases to bomb them.
@margay347 ай бұрын
Meteor is so good though I love my f8 constantly get 2-4 kills a game… unless it’s an up tier then it gets stomped
@perfectpotato_eu41296 ай бұрын
That would be quite an interesting tree for a Co-op-PvE Enduring Confrontation/Conflicts of the World mode with weekly rotation. But we all know we won't ever get this. PvE is Gaijin's kryptonite.
@therollerlollerman7 ай бұрын
The famous Top Gun program was created solely over F-4s getting clapped by MiGs, consistently.
@marcushalberstam53277 ай бұрын
The Wyvern probably goes up from 4.3 to like, what, 5.7, 6.0? Since its a turboprop
@T1A44377 ай бұрын
Loved this vid! ❤
@69Television7 ай бұрын
This channel is incredibly underrated man
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
Thank you man! This is very appreciated
@manouverr7 ай бұрын
This list would be so good.. I wonder what the ground one would look like
@Vacxt7 ай бұрын
This should definitely be a alternate game mode.
@masterclips76577 ай бұрын
What I really want to do is do this myself sit down get into and fill out a proper way to set battle ratings to planes tanks ships and helicopters everything so we can finally agree on what the change needs to be.
@Ajdarling1327 ай бұрын
seems like a good idea for a stand alone game
@bananaborn47857 ай бұрын
murica do be playing into that late game
@Jason-jb1vs7 ай бұрын
Imaging playing tiger 1 in 1943! Oh wait, isn't that just 5.3 where it stayed for a long time
@r.ndomperson7 ай бұрын
i mean it is 5.7 now, not too much worse
@antonizajac39077 ай бұрын
It's funny because you can see the before and after of the influx of Paperclip Germans on the Aviation industry reflected in this
@gamedudepc7 ай бұрын
a production year br like simulator battles would be fun for people wanting more realism without going straight into simulator
@your_avg_us_main7 ай бұрын
someone get this man the mic he deserves RIGHT NOW
@Stardust_the_F-104C7 ай бұрын
Have you done tanks as well? If not bloody do it
@coucoul387 ай бұрын
We need historical events like that, even with the community 😂
@PTK8187 ай бұрын
Great Video!
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
Thank you mr ptk8604
@hudsongray50917 ай бұрын
Should be a 4th game mode where this applies
@samunagy2217 ай бұрын
5:37 "Japan [...] lets the US catch up Midway through [...]" lol
@ZackSavage13 күн бұрын
P-39 salvages the early wwii american tech tree for me.
@35SF7 ай бұрын
German Mains: iF wAr ThUnDeR wAs ReAlIsTiC tIgEr'S wOuLd AcTuAlLy Be EfFeCtIvE!!!! 4.0 Tiger Soviet Mains: Kv-1 BR 0.3 Hey baby girl 😘
@jobmolenaar3817 ай бұрын
Now I have good view of everything Thank you
@yuanfurbax7 ай бұрын
Germany post war should be higher considering having the MiG-29G which has probably the best IR missiles ingame rn
@ianslaby57037 ай бұрын
re 2005 is the best prop aircraft in the game based purely on how much fun it is.
@judebender76667 ай бұрын
Not a historian but so no criticism :) love the video would love to have it be longer.
@danutmh7 ай бұрын
Even if the i16's and chaikas get 20mm's , they will face other biplanes so it's not that big of a deal
@ajesbayes90577 ай бұрын
Would love to see the same chart but with tanks
@MrSquigglies7 ай бұрын
This would make a fantastic April fool's event
@CEO-of-sleeping7 ай бұрын
Me and my meteor rip people to shreds. Its a great plane with insane turnrate for 7.3
@sesameoil00097 ай бұрын
great video NGL
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
Thank you man! This really means a lot. I appreciate comments like this so much cause videos don’t always do super well on views, and it can feel kinda crappy, but it’s really nice to know people enjoy it. Happy Thanksgiving!
@sesameoil00097 ай бұрын
@@trainingdays Happy Thanksgiving!
@stansearcheslife63637 ай бұрын
Do this with tanks and you should have added a cold war and modern day period aswell
@Feuriger_Kriegsheld7 ай бұрын
Do for the ground forces! Chances are he won’t read this 😂
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
But I did 👀
@Neutral_man7 ай бұрын
please try to find one also about tanks
@lolze9526087 ай бұрын
can we get a tank version of this if it exists?
@jacobv65057 ай бұрын
maybe im just a bad pilot, because i die to the meteor A LOT, i cannot stress how many times i die to that thing it kicks my teeth in lol
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
To be fair I mostly fly Sim and mostly see it in slightly up tiered matches, so not the fairest of fights
@VonMed7 ай бұрын
Well,they decided the unequally add aircrAft,we barely in gen 4 and we are getting modern tanks
@Enegene_History7 ай бұрын
I'd really love this version of the game.
@endybear37507 ай бұрын
do tanks. also love the vid.
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
Thank you very much!
@noahsawesomevids4227 ай бұрын
What if by what the fight and when they fought more historical
@notafrog20407 ай бұрын
this is hilarious. Shows how German mains asking for this really only do it because of the nation they play
@jaiell20497 ай бұрын
No Hurricane for pre war Britain?
@greeny24787 ай бұрын
Bro did not just slander the meteor
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
🚛🗑
@lector-dogmatixsicarii15377 ай бұрын
Sea Jesus is coming, look busy.
@user-vs4hl1jj8f7 ай бұрын
if you ever do this again include the vietnam war and the korien war and i think ther are a couple of of others that may be good to ad as they wre imes of tchnological advancent
@johnroscoe24067 ай бұрын
Ah I see we're just going to use COMCHINA flag for everything, even ROC. Very good citizen Mao approves.
@deliriousgaming94327 ай бұрын
I really wish they switched their BR to era based, it would be so much better, but I don't know any of the downsides that might come with that lol
@lector-dogmatixsicarii15377 ай бұрын
>Be sweaty Jarrod >Play I-Sherman with AMX-30 gun >Get extremely enraged you can no longer face lol WW2 heavies >Bot spam and gaslight the community over this >Gaijin sees whale status >Game goes back to being even more shit so you can enjoy vagisil
@juliancastro12977 ай бұрын
Could you expand the A tier?
@appa6097 ай бұрын
The tierlist would have been a lot better if you went by more uniform date ranges rather than lumping "postwar".
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
I was thinking heavily about that before the video. It’s just a lot to cover all around and I didn’t want to make it super complicated cause it’s all for fun. If I do a tank one in the future I’ll definitely be thinking about that tho!
@therealgaben55277 ай бұрын
@@trainingdaysplease make more than 3 ranges. Really you should have early, mid, and late ww2 just since tanks changed so heavily in such a short amount of time
@Macius1926 ай бұрын
*noone talking about me 163 ABSOLUTE dominance in every game*
@Losowy7 ай бұрын
Why is pre war italy so low? Their CR. 32 are really good
@aziqasri54357 ай бұрын
"Let's the US catch Midway through ",tell me is that intended?
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
😉
@BlueProductions127 ай бұрын
Can you do this but in ground too?
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
Coming soon to theaters 🍿
@MR_Q__7 ай бұрын
got to have a Events do you want this
@prvt.harumi68217 ай бұрын
pretty cool
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@cheesedood53137 ай бұрын
hmmm i think the soviets fare quiete well as the mig 21 was facing the phantom jets wich dominated the americans hard. yes the top tier stuff is a little outdated but planes like the mig 29 and yak 141, has 0 problem fighting the f16 and f14.
@VonMed7 ай бұрын
I mean it would make it historically accurate,if they removed all of the bias Russian and Chinese paper vehicles
@monostripezebras7 ай бұрын
Gotta love grind thunder history: "Israel was pretty low in WW2" lol..
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
😂
@Nicer_Ricer_JDM7 ай бұрын
I’m surprised you gave France post war A tier because people sleep on their missiles so hard 💯
@MrEsphoenix7 ай бұрын
I like how for WW2 pretty much all the A and S tier nations were countered by Britain, yet Britain only gets B tier.
@Macius1926 ай бұрын
tell me how they counter me 163
@KekusMagnus7 ай бұрын
Those can balanced in asymetrical matchups, which would be fun. Unfortunately, gaijin is lazy and wants everyone to play team deathmatch all the time
@johnnnyluk7 ай бұрын
Imagine being named after a crime thriller film directed by Antoine Fuqua that was released in 2001. The movie follows LAPD narcotics officer Jake Hoyt, played by Ethan Hawke, as he undergoes a day of training with veteran detective Alonzo Harris, played by Denzel Washington. Throughout the day, Hoyt becomes increasingly uncomfortable with Alonzo's unorthodox and morally questionable methods. As the training progresses, it becomes clear that Alonzo is involved in corrupt activities, including drug dealing and extortion. The film explores themes of police corruption, morality, and the challenges faced by those who try to maintain their integrity within a corrupt system. The story takes several twists and turns, leading to a tense and dramatic climax. Denzel Washington's performance as the charismatic yet morally ambiguous Alonzo earned him widespread acclaim, including an Academy Award for Best Actor. "Training Day" is known for its gritty portrayal of the LAPD and its exploration of the thin line between right and wrong in the pursuit of justice. Try and make some original content instead of a shitty tier list video about a chart that you didn't make!
@trainingdays7 ай бұрын
The fact that this is made with AI is soooo ironic