No video

Every Animal In Your DNA

  Рет қаралды 190,861

Domain of Science

Domain of Science

Күн бұрын

You are the living ancestor of an unbroken chain of lives stretching from you, through your mother and your grandmother all the way back through the complete history of life on planet Earth to the very first life forms that appeared around four billion years ago.
#naturalhistory #DomainOfScience
You can buy this poster here: www.redbubble....
Get all my other posters here: www.redbubble....
And free downloadable versions of this and the other posters here. If you want to print them out for educational purposes please do! www.flickr.com...
More info and links:
Times humans nearly became extinct
io9.gizmodo.co...
Bottlenecks of human population
academic.oup.c...
Animal Ancestors illustration
ntamura.devian...
Timeline of the evolutionary history of life on Earthh
en.wikipedia.o...
Early sponge
www.sciencemag....
List of phylogeny of human ancestors
biology.stacke...
Acorn worm genes shared with humans
www.scienceworl...
Thanks so much to my supporters on Patreon. If you enjoy my videos and would like to help me make more this is the best way and I appreciate it very much. / domainofscience
The Great Courses Plus is currently available to watch through a web browser to almost anyone in the world and optimized for the US market. The Great Courses Plus is currently working to both optimize the product globally and accept credit card payments globally.
I also write a series of children’s science books call Professor Astro Cat, these links are to the publisher, but they are available in all good bookshops around the world in 18 languages and counting:
Frontiers of Space (age 7+): nobrow.net/shop...
Atomic Adventure (age 7+): nobrow.net/shop...
Intergalactic Activity Book (age 7+): nobrow.net/shop...
Solar System Book (age 3+, available in UK now, and rest of world in spring 2018): nobrow.net/shop...
Solar System App:
And the new Professor Astro Cat App: itunes.apple.c...
Find me on twitter, Instagram, and my website:
dominicwalliman...
/ dominicwalliman
/ dominicwalliman
/ dominicwalliman

Пікірлер: 993
@coolfer2
@coolfer2 3 жыл бұрын
"You are connected to eons and eons of creatures all fighting for survival and WINNING." Great motivational quote there.
@karmasutra4774
@karmasutra4774 2 жыл бұрын
That was pretty intense to visualize lol
@bororobo3805
@bororobo3805 Жыл бұрын
I mean, the millions of sperm your father deposited in your mother fought to get to the egg, in the end the one that got in turned out to be you. Life is a competition
@theriveroffaith852
@theriveroffaith852 20 күн бұрын
Winning when everyone else lost... isn't really a win.
@matthewtheobald1231
@matthewtheobald1231 6 жыл бұрын
So basically if I never have kids, I'll be the first failure of my entire ancestral lineage spanning back nearly 4 billion years....No pressure xD
@sawamichelle
@sawamichelle 4 жыл бұрын
I'm one of the the enders!
@Funnysterste
@Funnysterste 4 жыл бұрын
Evolution has no goal. Therefore there is no failure.
@jackxiao9702
@jackxiao9702 4 жыл бұрын
And if you don't have a child of your gender, you will be the first one to break the gender chain.
@delongtsway953
@delongtsway953 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah kinda.
@ivanvukasovic1371
@ivanvukasovic1371 4 жыл бұрын
@@Funnysterste Shouldn't we let each other to decide if evolution, or life in general has a goal, instead of simply proclaiming the goallessness as if it were some kind of a hard science? Now I get it that in the case of not producing offspring, it is way easier to cope with it by simply saying "oh it never really meant anything so dw", but that doesn't make it correct.
@dariusduesentrieb
@dariusduesentrieb 6 жыл бұрын
so spongebob was the great-great-...-great-great-great-...-great-great-grandfather of us all?!
@Horny_Fruit_Flies
@Horny_Fruit_Flies 5 жыл бұрын
No. How can Spongebob be our ancestor if he was born in the XX century?
@cvit47
@cvit47 5 жыл бұрын
No, we share a common ancestor.
@danielcowan87
@danielcowan87 4 жыл бұрын
@@Horny_Fruit_Flies you are so incredibly fun. In fact you have the whole squad laughing. Congratulations
@ASLUHLUHCE
@ASLUHLUHCE 4 жыл бұрын
More like billionth-cousins
@farenhite4329
@farenhite4329 4 жыл бұрын
No because they are a dish sponge. They are literally litter.
@warren286
@warren286 5 жыл бұрын
The real crazy part is that life somehow formed from inert elements basically because carbon acts like glue.
@adrianbiber5340
@adrianbiber5340 4 жыл бұрын
We are made of star-stuff.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
It never on it's own accord. Germ theory showed spontaneous life does not happen. Discovery of DNA showed there is no naturalistic origin of life. Life is based solely on an immaterial concept. Information. Logic dictates rationality does not come from irrationality. The burden of proof is on those who say it does. Information requires at it's origin a mind. The origin of life world conference with the best scientists in the world in their fields that gather for this topic have basically wholly ruled out every theory there is right now for a naturalistic origin of life. The last one to go was panspermia.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
@@Poliostasis Of course they are, logical assumptions from using a logical mind. You ca never get code out of purely statistical process. A random number generator can never produce information. This are logical assumptions. Assumptions are something we have to do in life. There is no absolute proof of anything outside of math.
@TricksterAndAwesome
@TricksterAndAwesome 2 жыл бұрын
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep you believe in god? Burden of proofs on you
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
@@TricksterAndAwesome nope burden of proof is on the one exerting cause and effect dont magically apply in the one instance of the implication for the first cause. burden of proof is on the one claiming naturalism can magically produce rationality from irrationality across the cosmos including the basis of life. by the observation of the observable universe God is the default position to assume from. the problem is on the flip side you have no other naturalistic explanations to either refute or give side by side. it's been game over for naturalism for awhile now. science is clearly on the side of intelligent design spanning all the major issues.
@garrethbayethe2149
@garrethbayethe2149 6 жыл бұрын
mistake at 0:07 ; should be "You are the living Descendant" not "Living Ancestor"!
@leteveryoneknow
@leteveryoneknow 6 жыл бұрын
Well someone is paying attention in the class
@mrjonathanvella
@mrjonathanvella 4 жыл бұрын
I hear and read this mistake a lot for some reason
@hereb4theend
@hereb4theend 3 жыл бұрын
Nah fam it's true. All animals are genetically engineered from human DNA. The education system got it backwards.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
It's literally functionally impossible for you or I to be the descendant of other life as portrayed. There isn't even enough time for evolution to take place and give all the species that have ever existed up to humans assuming it is even a functional theory.
@michaelanderson7715
@michaelanderson7715 2 жыл бұрын
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep "It's literally functionally impossible for you or I to be the descendant of other life as portrayed. There isn't even enough time for evolution to take place and give all the species that have ever existed up to humans assuming it is even a functional theory." - PhD zoologist here; I'd love to see your thoughts transferred into peer-reviewed, accepted science. The idea of evolution being ditched as a theory is intriguing...GET ON IT!
@domainofscience
@domainofscience 6 жыл бұрын
A counter thought to this video is the Anthropic Principle, where the only reason you can appreciate that you are the end of a chain of life is because you are one of the alive ones. All the creatures that don't exist cannot contemplate their non-existence. I like the Anthropic Principle but thought that it might undermine the 'mind blowing' part of this video but I don't think it does because even though it is true, it is not scientifically useful. Because we know a lot about our evolutionary history we can look at it and see all of the places where the path to humanity was nearly wiped out, or where seemingly improbable events happened like the formation of the first complex cells or evolving multicellularity. So I think our evolutionary journey is still incredible despite it having to exist for me to appreciate it.
@florenciaferlido6538
@florenciaferlido6538 6 жыл бұрын
Domain of Science hey! I love your videos so much. I was wondering what are your thoughts on veganism? I watched this video and it made me think about it and whether or not you are vegan. Cheers
@Evan-rl1rn
@Evan-rl1rn 6 жыл бұрын
Domain of Science So does this mean that me and the bacteria on computer screen could be distant cousins 😂
@jy1733
@jy1733 6 жыл бұрын
Too bad that the Tree of Life (/ Common Descent) doctrine is a fiction according to Richard Dawkins and Craig Venter. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hJ9oZ7ZqvJ26lH0.html
@redwanmohammed5029
@redwanmohammed5029 6 жыл бұрын
We love your work so much
@MrPurplePotatoes
@MrPurplePotatoes 6 жыл бұрын
why does it matter that is has to exist for you to appreciate it? I don't get why that would take away from the mind blowing part
@TheHalawaniTube
@TheHalawaniTube 6 жыл бұрын
So.. one of my ancestors was a sponge...
@domainofscience
@domainofscience 6 жыл бұрын
Yes! :D I nearly called this video "Your grandmother was a sponge." But thought it might be too weird.
@pointlessgimmickyusername9196
@pointlessgimmickyusername9196 6 жыл бұрын
No, many of them were. Also worms.
@Godofreduardo
@Godofreduardo 6 жыл бұрын
YOU HAVE SPONGEBOB AS A ANCESTOR
@eboysix
@eboysix 6 жыл бұрын
I'm glad you didn't call it that. It sounds a bit clickbaity and would've attracted complainers or trolls
@gbeziuk
@gbeziuk 6 жыл бұрын
And one of my cousins is a banana. Actually, not too distant one, I guess. Not as distant as AIDS virus, for sure.
@noxabellus
@noxabellus 6 жыл бұрын
Old ladies: The pinnacle of evolution
@falkonerr
@falkonerr 6 жыл бұрын
Let's see, we don't know with certainty: - when and where the first cell formed (whether on Earth or elsewhere in the universe, and then got here by panspermia) - if single-cell organisms are present only on Earth or the whole solar system or the whole galaxy or the whole universe, and if they have all the same single origin. - the exact path leading from organic molecules to the first cell. - if bacteria and archaea were the only two kinds of prokaryotes, or if there were many others and then disappeared. - if eukaryotes evolved later than prokaryotes, or at the same time and then they engulfed prokaryotes later. - if multicellularity and sexual reproduction evolved at the same time as eukaryotes or later. - to what extent lateral genetic transfer contributed to evolution among single-cell organisms and viruses. - if viruses evolved before or after the first cells. - if pre-Cambrian life forms evolved at a different evolutionary rate than post-Cambrian life forms. - if the Gaia hypothesis is right or wrong. - how the gradualist and the saltationist views of evolution can be reconciled. - how to cope with criticism to genetic determinism. - the place of teleology in evolutionary theory. ... and I'm sure I'm forgetting many other insignificant details... (Yes, you're right, we know nothing for certain, except that we are just a huge family...)
@NickRoman
@NickRoman 6 жыл бұрын
Or maybe we represent a decline in survivability. Old ladies: the current state of evolution. Not necessarily the most successful form.
@exnomer5002
@exnomer5002 3 жыл бұрын
Hah. CookieClicker Reference. Nice. *_ALL HAIL THE COSMIC GRANDMA_*
@evanzhao2865
@evanzhao2865 4 жыл бұрын
I was expecting at least a few millions of views. This channel is just too great of an opportunity to be missed by anyone.
@eryntodd
@eryntodd 2 жыл бұрын
Wanted to watch this video for educational purposes… but this honestly made me feel so much more grateful for my life and to stop taking all the other lucky humans I meet/live here for granted.. as we are all very lucky to be alive.
@ScienceClic
@ScienceClic 6 жыл бұрын
Great video ! I can only imagine the amount of work put in to draw all the animals, impressive ! It may have been interesting to stretch the picture to scale, maybe for a future video ?
@domainofscience
@domainofscience 6 жыл бұрын
Yeah I was thinking about how I would do it to scale but couldn't come up with an elegant way of doing it. Perhaps on a log scale because I fell like that is how our brains imagine time.
@falkonerr
@falkonerr 6 жыл бұрын
Let's see, we don't know with certainty: - when and where the first cell formed (whether on Earth or elsewhere in the universe, and then got here by panspermia) - if single-cell organisms are present only on Earth or the whole solar system or the whole galaxy or the whole universe, and if they have all the same single origin. - the exact path leading from organic molecules to the first cell. - if bacteria and archaea were the only two kinds of prokaryotes, or if there were many others and then disappeared. - if eukaryotes evolved later than prokaryotes, or at the same time and then they engulfed prokaryotes later. - if multicellularity and sexual reproduction evolved at the same time as eukaryotes or later. - to what extent lateral genetic transfer contributed to evolution among single-cell organisms and viruses. - if viruses evolved before or after the first cells. - if pre-Cambrian life forms evolved at a different evolutionary rate than post-Cambrian life forms. - if the Gaia hypothesis is right or wrong. - how the gradualist and the saltationist views of evolution can be reconciled. - how to cope with criticism to genetic determinism. - the place of teleology in evolutionary theory. ... and I'm sure I'm forgetting many other insignificant details... (Yes, you're right, we know nothing for certain, except that we are just a huge family...)
@thebirdmen7698
@thebirdmen7698 5 жыл бұрын
If you take an intro to geology class the first thing they tell you is to imagine earth's timescale as a calendar year, with all of human history occuring less than two minutes before midnight.
@ryankirby5295
@ryankirby5295 6 жыл бұрын
Just want to say that I watched a Ted talk you did awhile back and you mentioned you made KZfaq videos so I looked you up and I have watched so many of these. They are absolutely fantastic. I love the animations and the way you neatly explain topics that are fundamental to science. I am an astrophysics major in college and often find myself wondering about recent discoveries (like the gravitational waves) and I find you explain these things in such an immaculate way. So thank you.
@desiderata8811
@desiderata8811 4 жыл бұрын
What a great explanation. I’ve been reading about this subject for many years, and this vid summarizes it in a few minutes. Of course, it’s incomplete and simple. But how can one ask more in such a short time. Subscribed.
@Sultan-gf3sz
@Sultan-gf3sz 2 жыл бұрын
هل هذي حقيقة ام خرافة ؟
@israhassan8123
@israhassan8123 5 жыл бұрын
Wow, this channel is so informative and answers plenty of my complex questions. Great work!
@ScopeofScience
@ScopeofScience 6 жыл бұрын
Loved this! Pretty amazing to think that we are just links in an unbroken living chain that stretches back billions of years.
@jy1733
@jy1733 6 жыл бұрын
Too bad that the Tree of Life (/ Common Descent) doctrine is a fiction according to Richard Dawkins and Craig Venter. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hJ9oZ7ZqvJ26lH0.html
@s.unosson
@s.unosson 2 ай бұрын
This video presents a dogma, not evidence.
@Pfhorrest
@Pfhorrest 6 жыл бұрын
I am the ANCESTOR of a chain of life including all of that stuff? You mean descendant?
@Pfhorrest
@Pfhorrest 6 жыл бұрын
Also: "The Fact You Exist" is missing a "that".
@eboysix
@eboysix 6 жыл бұрын
I think 'that' is superfluous
@PaginasLetea
@PaginasLetea 6 жыл бұрын
You're the ancestor of life forms that will come millions of years from now
@falkonerr
@falkonerr 6 жыл бұрын
Let's see, we don't know with certainty: - when and where the first cell formed (whether on Earth or elsewhere in the universe, and then got here by panspermia) - if single-cell organisms are present only on Earth or the whole solar system or the whole galaxy or the whole universe, and if they have all the same single origin. - the exact path leading from organic molecules to the first cell. - if bacteria and archaea were the only two kinds of prokaryotes, or if there were many others and then disappeared. - if eukaryotes evolved later than prokaryotes, or at the same time and then they engulfed prokaryotes later. - if multicellularity and sexual reproduction evolved at the same time as eukaryotes or later. - to what extent lateral genetic transfer contributed to evolution among single-cell organisms and viruses. - if viruses evolved before or after the first cells. - if pre-Cambrian life forms evolved at a different evolutionary rate than post-Cambrian life forms. - if the Gaia hypothesis is right or wrong. - how the gradualist and the saltationist views of evolution can be reconciled. - how to cope with criticism to genetic determinism. - the place of teleology in evolutionary theory. ... and I'm sure I'm forgetting many other insignificant details... (Yes, you're right, we know nothing for certain, except that we are just a huge family...)
@NickRoman
@NickRoman 6 жыл бұрын
WasteLand , no, that's probably not true. That's the whole point here. For each of us, our line is likely to die out a few generations from now. For example, I will never have any children; so, I will be noone's ancestor. If your great grandchildren never have any children, then your line will die out 3 generations after you. It's just that _someone_ (or some organism on Earth right now) will be the ancestor of some organisms a million years from now. As great as humans might seem, it could be that no human alive right now will be anyone's ancestor a million years from now, but a flea will. Likely some bacterium will have descendants that last at least until millions of years from now.
@tuckerricklefs4830
@tuckerricklefs4830 3 жыл бұрын
Here's a nice way to some it up: "Life on Earth is one big extended family" -My biology textbook
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
Yet conveniently excludes the fact there is zero speciation in the fossil record. Basically saying just believe everything I say and don't question the validity of the science.
@andersonmyguy5054
@andersonmyguy5054 6 жыл бұрын
Please make more Map videos! They are just amazing, one of the most interesting educational videos i have seen in a while.
@MrFossil367ab45gfyth
@MrFossil367ab45gfyth 2 жыл бұрын
Basically, all life from the tiniest microbes to the biggest whales to the tallest trees are related. All life on Earth has the 4-base pairs in their DNA, linking all life to one common ancestor that existed in the Earth's early oceans. So basically, we're all one big happy family if you think about it! *MIND BLOWN*
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
It's not functional worked out theory. It has a multitude of issues. It's more science fiction than science honestly. Despite the ubiquitous mention of evolutionary theory. People act like it was established 100 years ago lol. The gaps have only greatly increased with the advancement of science they haven't closed with the model.
@SweatierAcorn
@SweatierAcorn 2 жыл бұрын
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep to fill every gap, you'd need to find every generation that has lived for millions of years, and that's just for a single species.
@michaelanderson7715
@michaelanderson7715 2 жыл бұрын
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep "It's not functional worked out theory. It has a multitude of issues. It's more science fiction than science honestly. Despite the ubiquitous mention of evolutionary theory. People act like it was established 100 years ago lol. The gaps have only greatly increased with the advancement of science they haven't closed with the model." - PhD zoologist here; I'd love to see your thoughts transferred into peer-reviewed, accepted science. The idea of evolution being ditched as a theory is intriguing...GET ON IT!
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
That is quite the assertion given speciation is wholly absent from the fossil record. The logical conclusion is all life as we see is based on an immaterial concept, information. That information requires a mind. There is no naturalistic process or phenomenon that can produce it. As we see common information shared across life that leads us to believe it has a common intelligent creator. That is a far more logical and straight forward assumption.
@s.unosson
@s.unosson 2 ай бұрын
What about the same designer theory?
@dcterr1
@dcterr1 3 жыл бұрын
Once again, great video and poster! I ordered 9 posters this morning, but I think I need to get this one as well!
@justusmoore4188
@justusmoore4188 6 жыл бұрын
0:37 wrong, the theory of evolution states that all life originated from a single common ancestor, not that life gets more complex as more life forms emerge.1:05 I wouldn’t call it a chain by any means at all, A chain would be a cycle happening over and over. Evolution doesn’t work that way, it’s more like multiple lines splitting off from one central line, this central line would be the common ancestor between all the other lines. P.S. these lines all grouped up with the central line is called a Clade.1:31 10,000 years ago?! Which group of modern Homo Sapiens are you talking about? The Homo genus can date our African common ancestry back to around 2 million years ago with one of the first being Homo Habilis or “Handy Man”.1:55 Homo Habilis wasn’t an ancestor, he was a relative who speciated from the common ancestor shared with Homo Erectus. However, Erectus was a common ancestor shared between us Neanderthalensis and Heidelbergensis (who in turn was the common ancestor between us and Neanderthalensis). Also, it’s MYA(Millions of years ago), not MA but i’m sure someone pointed that out already. 2:13 Thank you for saying “most of the dinosaurs” people seem to forget or just not know that Birds are the only living lineage of the Dinosaurs that didn’t get killed in the K-Pg mass extinction :)3:11 it’s been hypothesized that our Universal Common Ancestor wasn’t the FIRST lifeform on Earth and could have been the first organism that actually managed to survive in the chaotic landscape of Earth Billions of years of ago. There could have been hundreds or even thousands of organisms that came before our UCA! Just FYI.3:51 This is more of a personal opinion, but I see no point in preserving species that we have no beneficial or mutualistic relationship with. All life forms go extinct eventually, including us. Overall your video wasn’t completely inaccurate but did have quite a few errors in it. I hope you didn’t take this as an attack or anything, (and if i missed anything someone let me know) it’s just that I study Evolutionary Biology and I want to make sure that the public is correctly educated on this subject, this outdated and inaccurate “chain of life” concept is just one of the many inaccuracies that hope to see extinguished or minimized from human societies. The phylogenetic Tree of Life model is always being updated and is much more scientifically accurate and I think many folks would find it more fascinating, less anthropocentric, and very cool :) Also, for anyone interested learning in. Evolutionary Biology or any kind of Biology I would recommend the “understanding evolution “ series from the University of Berkeley or the Encyclopedia of life project!
@LEVIATHANDAVID
@LEVIATHANDAVID 2 жыл бұрын
Hi. I want to ask you something? Why some christians and others religions refuse and other attack the argument of evolution? and what's is your argument to speech about evolution? regards.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
@@LEVIATHANDAVID Probably because it's scientifically nonsense. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does. There is no naturalistic source for information, the basis of all life. Information is a immaterial concept that requires a mind. Also the bible claims a mind, God created life right? Bible is also the only source that got the start of the universe correct with the big bang theory, nothing else came close.
@DylanBegazo
@DylanBegazo 4 жыл бұрын
Your video is why I love nature and animals. Because everything alive around me are fellow survivors aka winners who are here. We made it. We are making it. This is why I care about the environment my fellow winners inhabit (including winners of our own species aka people who are alive rn obviously). This video is the logical rational reason why I am an environmentalist. Sure I’m also an athlete and a cook and a son etc but I will always also be an environmentalist. We must preserve as much biodiversity as possible. Even within Christianity for example, our first God given job was to name animals and tend to the garden and maintain the peace within the garden. NEVER to reduce the diversity in the garden not to harm it. Yet humanity is constantly reducing biodiversity to this very day with its harmful practices. We are constantly harming our big round vast planetary garden. We are pretty sucky gardeners. So I agree with you. We aught to preserve biodiversity. Help our fellow winners out not get rid of them. We need nations to be more Green minded Nations. Gotta protect the environment. It’s not working though. Governments don’t care. So the only way to make them care is to infiltrate them so environmentalists can have a say again. We need green Senators. Green congressmen. Green everybody. Heck why not even a Green prime minister. Or a green president too.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
There is no naturalistic process or phenomenon that can create information the basis of all life. Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does. This is why Darwinian evolution is nonsensical along with the rest of naturalism. It is predicated on a mechanism that does not exist. It is the year 2022 and naturalism nor evolutionary theory is still not worked out or more importantly functional. Even what should be evolutions greatest and most widespread evidence, speciation in the fossil record is wholly absent. Remember complexity is code, information. Code doesn't magically write itself, nor can natural selection do such a thing it can only influence how genes express themselves. 99% of all species that have existed are extinct. Food for thought.
@slothinessless
@slothinessless 5 жыл бұрын
ancient Cyanobacteria are definitely NOT our ancestors. they are on a separate photosynthetic strand of prokaryotes. neither are ancient Cnidarians. regarding ancient sponges we don't know yet
@soufian2733
@soufian2733 6 жыл бұрын
But WHY did "a mix of chemicals" start replicating ?
@domainofscience
@domainofscience 6 жыл бұрын
It's a mystery that people are trying to crack. One hypothesis is inorganic dividing droplets were the start: www.quantamagazine.org/dividing-droplets-could-explain-origin-of-life-20170119/
@Pfhorrest
@Pfhorrest 6 жыл бұрын
Some chemicals catalyze other chemical reactions. These are like tiny simple machines that make other chemicals, that are in turn other tiny machines that make other chemicals that are other tiny machines and so on. If you happen to end up with a loop of catalyzing reactions, some chemicals that tend to build other chemicals that tend to build themselves and so on in a loop, you have indirect replication going on, and those chemicals will tend to fill the sea with themselves. Random variations in the process that are more efficient than others will, by virtue of that fact, end up more prevalent, and that's the beginning of evolution: random variations of self-replicating processes that are better at replicating will tend to become more common. The rest is evolutionary history.
@lukaszmanczak9951
@lukaszmanczak9951 6 жыл бұрын
The most rational explanation is just...GOD's spark, everytning needs to have a cause. Have you heard about fine tunning universe theory: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h5maqcmnzdWXc3k.html
@Kronimiciad
@Kronimiciad 6 жыл бұрын
Invoking god is the *least* rational explanation. We have never observed any sort of non-deterministic natural event, like what would happen if a god intervened in the universe. We cannot, therefore, use it as an explanation for a scientific question whenever we don't know the answer.
@RyanGenX2
@RyanGenX2 6 жыл бұрын
@Lukasz Manczak If you stand at a spot where the a lightning strike hits, was the lightning strike designed to hit you? or was it pure chance that you happened to be at the exact same spot? You cannot use a result to argue why something happened.
@rockskate15
@rockskate15 6 жыл бұрын
You deserve waaaay more views! Great video! Keep it up!
@sanjeevkatariya4173
@sanjeevkatariya4173 Жыл бұрын
Would love if your posters were also available as apparel - would wear this in a heartbeat!
@raesiford6316
@raesiford6316 4 жыл бұрын
Learning about evolution gives me the feeling that I’m learning about my family history 🤘🏻 makes me feel happy 😆
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
Evolution is absent from the fossil record, is that what you are saying about your family history...?
@s.unosson
@s.unosson 2 ай бұрын
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep The evolution theory is the only branch of science that does not like the word "intelligent" and even less "design".
@Larr.y
@Larr.y 7 ай бұрын
er, there seems to be an error at the very start, one that doesn't inspire confidence in the narrator's qualifications ... surely "You are the living ancestor" should be "You are the living descendent" ...?
@polarisgemini52
@polarisgemini52 6 жыл бұрын
I am no expert and I appreciate what you tried to explain through this video but if there's anything I have learnt from creationists, it's that creationists are unable to distinguish between a linear ancestor and a common ancestor. Creationists unironically think that we came from a linear chain of older animals which is preposterous. You did point out about common ancestry here but if creationists were watching this, they would believe even more firmly that evolution is a straight chain and not a web. I wish people who made videos on evolution discussed common ancestry in more detail for I believe knowledge on it remains most misunderstood among public.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
That is the least of the issues to represent the model. The lack of links or speciation being wholly absent in the fossil record is a big issue to presenting such a model. Far less the rest of the fossil record information. Such as the Cambrian explosion showing a multitude of biological structures showing up in a geological instant. Or the logistics required alone of the evolutionary model and rectifying all life today and the 99% of other species have existed coming from that. Even the most basic factor time can't be rectified. Or the fact evolutionary theory is asserting with no evidence rationality can come from irrationality in information gain in DNA.
@michaelanderson7715
@michaelanderson7715 2 жыл бұрын
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep - PhD zoologist here; I'd love to see your thoughts transferred into peer-reviewed, accepted science. The idea of evolution being ditched as a theory is intriguing...GET ON IT!
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
@@michaelanderson7715 It already has been stop being lazy and look. Where do you think my arguments came from? They certainly weren't pulled out of thin air nor opinions with no factual basis. Any of those missing links found in the fossil record in the last 5 months? Or speciation still wholly absent. Food for thought.
@michaelanderson7715
@michaelanderson7715 Жыл бұрын
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep "It already has been stop being lazy and look." - this is your claim, restating it isn't substantiation "Where do you think my arguments came from? They certainly weren't pulled out of thin air nor opinions with no factual basis." - that's how they appear; the point already made is for you to substantiate them! "Any of those missing links found in the fossil record in the last 5 months?" - I don't keep abreast of that, but you need to first establish what is missing "Or speciation still wholly absent. Food for thought." - if you could provide substantiation of 'evolution being ditched as a theory', _that_ would be food for thought -------- So far all you have is ignorant drivel.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
​@@michaelanderson7715 Ignorance would be staying wholly ignorant of the conversation while being spoon fed substantiated arguments of it's issues over 9 months. Then having the audacity to respond asking for it to be spoon fed further, and even more incredulous stating the other party is ignorant while presenting zero objections, far less substantiated ones. That is what is called shameless.
@joannekelleher1859
@joannekelleher1859 4 жыл бұрын
This is beautifully presented but contains at least one major error. Cyanobacteria are not part of the origin of animals leading to vertebrates. This was pointed out below by Amir Rubinstein and perhaps others. I just saw this video and encourage you to fix this error. Professor K
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
It doesn't matter it's all nonsense. There are no links anywhere. Speciation is wholly absent from the fossil record.
@cameronadams4366
@cameronadams4366 6 жыл бұрын
I feel so connected to the universe after this 😌🙏 thank you and God bless you 😉
@FALprofessional
@FALprofessional 6 жыл бұрын
Quite oxymoronic.
@cameronadams4366
@cameronadams4366 6 жыл бұрын
FALprofessional I was being sarcastic, hence the wink
@FALprofessional
@FALprofessional 6 жыл бұрын
True enough. ;-)
@Zorbatron
@Zorbatron 4 жыл бұрын
Your videos and posters are phenomenal. Bravo!
@siaw0000
@siaw0000 6 жыл бұрын
It seems absolutely absurd to me that there are people nowadays who still deny evolution. It is the most rational explanation that biological evidence points to. And for all those people using the "it's a THEORY argument", could you first look up what a theory in science is please.
@jy1733
@jy1733 6 жыл бұрын
Too bad that the Tree of Life (/ Common Descent) doctrine is a fiction according to Richard Dawkins and Craig Venter. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hJ9oZ7ZqvJ26lH0.html
@falkonerr
@falkonerr 6 жыл бұрын
“The Overriding Supremacy of the Myth” In recent years some scientists have raised serious doubts about the viability of the theory of evolution as expressed by Charles Darwin. This is especially true of molecular biologists. In his book Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Michael Denton, a researcher in biology, wrote: “The raising of the status of Darwinian theory to a self-evident axiom has had the consequence that the very real problems and objections with which Darwin so painfully laboured in the Origin have become entirely invisible. Crucial problems such as the absence of connecting links or the difficulty of envisaging intermediate forms are virtually never discussed and the creation of even the most complex of adaptations is put down to natural selection without a ripple of doubt.” He continues: “The overriding supremacy of the myth has created a widespread illusion that the theory of evolution was all but proved one hundred years ago . . . Nothing could be further from the truth.”-Page 77. “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.”-Origin of Species, Charles Darwin, page 154. “As the number of unexplained, irreducibly complex biological systems increases, our confidence that Darwin’s criterion of failure has been met skyrockets toward the maximum that science allows.” (Darwin’s Black Box-The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, Michael J. Behe, pages 39-40) In other words, recent findings in the field of molecular biology raise serious doubts about Darwin’s theory. “The result of [the] cumulative efforts to investigate the cell-to investigate life at the molecular level-is a loud, clear, piercing cry of ‘design!’ The result is so unambiguous and so significant that it must be ranked as one of the greatest achievements in the history of science. The discovery rivals those of Newton and Einstein, Lavoisier and Schrödinger, Pasteur, and Darwin. The observation of the intelligent design of life is as momentous as the observation that the earth goes around the sun.”-Darwin’s Black Box, pages 232-3.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
Follow the evidence. Evidence shows there is no possible naturalistic origin of life. Life is based on an immaterial concept with no naturalistic origin. Universe has no naturalistic origin and exhibits extraordinary fine tuning and the logically impossible explanation of evolution is not a functional nor worked out theory even remotely. Logically evolutions strongest and most wide spread evidence that we should find if true is speciation in the fossil record. We do not. Three major blows to evolution, no spontaneous naturalistic oriigin of life(germ theory), immaterial origin of life(information/DNA), fossil record does not support the theory(no speciation, many biological structures appear in a geological instant like in the Cambrian explosion).
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
@@jy1733 Might want to watch Dawkins debate John Lennox at Oxford.
@lowkeynz
@lowkeynz 6 жыл бұрын
As someone with no kids the unbroken chain of life is a deeply depressing thought
@Breadcrochets
@Breadcrochets 4 жыл бұрын
The giant sloth and “gorilla horse” images are misleading because they aren’t our direct ancestors like everything else in the graphic. Also shouldn’t the very end of the line be RNA, or even branched out to represent the combination of different organisms into what became cellular life, eg mitochondria. Love your maps and unique art style, keep up the great work!
@dhue7463
@dhue7463 2 жыл бұрын
Precisely what I was thinking, the gorilla horse and the giant sloth confused me for a second.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
There aren't any ancestors in the first place. Speciation is wholly absent from the fossil record. Evolutionary theory isn't even functional. Information doesn't magically write itself. Naturalism cannot produce such a thing. The whole concept was always a non-starter from a purely logical perspective.
@chrisrus1965
@chrisrus1965 6 ай бұрын
I was surprised to learn how old our unbroken chain is. It's not much younger than it possibly could be, a large chunk of time not all that much younger than the universe itself.
@misbpdclddugjy9041
@misbpdclddugjy9041 Жыл бұрын
Your approach to deal with most complicated subjects is praiseworthy, I wish ur videos should be included in academics round the world.....I got fundamentals of medicine, engineering, maths ...through your videos only ....great work ..GBU..
@earthlingi72
@earthlingi72 4 ай бұрын
Great Sketch ! whats even more amazing is that in the Womb before birth, you go THROUGH some of those earlier life forms shapes and forms before finally reaching to be a human baby. Yes, you grow a tail, loose it, grow hair like a wild animal and loose it etc. etc. blows my mind
@HamzahHusain_the_sexy_beast
@HamzahHusain_the_sexy_beast 6 жыл бұрын
Aye love this channel
@falkonerr
@falkonerr 6 жыл бұрын
“The Overriding Supremacy of the Myth” In recent years some scientists have raised serious doubts about the viability of the theory of evolution as expressed by Charles Darwin. This is especially true of molecular biologists. In his book Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Michael Denton, a researcher in biology, wrote: “The raising of the status of Darwinian theory to a self-evident axiom has had the consequence that the very real problems and objections with which Darwin so painfully laboured in the Origin have become entirely invisible. Crucial problems such as the absence of connecting links or the difficulty of envisaging intermediate forms are virtually never discussed and the creation of even the most complex of adaptations is put down to natural selection without a ripple of doubt.” He continues: “The overriding supremacy of the myth has created a widespread illusion that the theory of evolution was all but proved one hundred years ago . . . Nothing could be further from the truth.”-Page 77. “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.”-Origin of Species, Charles Darwin, page 154. “As the number of unexplained, irreducibly complex biological systems increases, our confidence that Darwin’s criterion of failure has been met skyrockets toward the maximum that science allows.” (Darwin’s Black Box-The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, Michael J. Behe, pages 39-40) In other words, recent findings in the field of molecular biology raise serious doubts about Darwin’s theory. “The result of [the] cumulative efforts to investigate the cell-to investigate life at the molecular level-is a loud, clear, piercing cry of ‘design!’ The result is so unambiguous and so significant that it must be ranked as one of the greatest achievements in the history of science. The discovery rivals those of Newton and Einstein, Lavoisier and Schrödinger, Pasteur, and Darwin. The observation of the intelligent design of life is as momentous as the observation that the earth goes around the sun.”-Darwin’s Black Box, pages 232-3.
@tibodeclercq2131
@tibodeclercq2131 3 ай бұрын
I think it's great how we acquired the scientific knowledge to reconstruct how our evolutionary chain might have looked like! Amazing! A few days ago our cat brought a mouse in our house and I took a few seconds to realize this is how we somewhat looked like 80-90M years ago.
@s.unosson
@s.unosson 2 ай бұрын
It is not scientific knowledge to "know" how something MIGHT have happened. It is a theory.
@tibodeclercq2131
@tibodeclercq2131 2 ай бұрын
@@s.unosson do you even know what a scientific theory is? In every speech people use that word way differently and you might confuse the 2.
@s.unosson
@s.unosson 2 ай бұрын
@@tibodeclercq2131 I know that a scientific theory is still a theory.
@s.unosson
@s.unosson Ай бұрын
@@tibodeclercq2131 Quite simply, when something is described as "could", "might", "it is supposed" etc., it is a theory, that it is called scientific, does not change it.
@Rice_enjoyer999
@Rice_enjoyer999 10 күн бұрын
@@s.unosson so you don't know then
@michaelanderson4849
@michaelanderson4849 4 жыл бұрын
Somewhere there is a very triggered creationist.
@R0NYFL0NY
@R0NYFL0NY 3 жыл бұрын
Somewhere? Check the comment section lol.
@daddust
@daddust 3 жыл бұрын
No. I just can’t get by the fact that there is a giant horse on this timeline. We don’t have them in our chain.
@Volodimar
@Volodimar 3 жыл бұрын
Neither cyanobacteria, nor chnidaria.
@msteresa653
@msteresa653 3 жыл бұрын
I love the preservation of biodiversity as the takeaway!! And you could extend the increasing complexity and diversity of life back even further, to the seemingly inevitable increasing complexity and diversity of rocks, minerals, elements, and all other abiotic components of existence. I don't think it's a stretch to say that biodiversity is the very point of existence, and yet the lives we lead every day in industrial civilization brutalize that legacy and strip away the Earth's ability to sustain complex biomes. Let's turn that around shall we?
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
There is no naturalistic process or phenomenon that can create information the basis of all life). Rationality does not come from irrationality, the burden of proof is on those who say it does. This is why Darwinian evolution is nonsensical along with the rest of naturalism. It is predicated on a mechanism that does not exist. It is the year 2022 and naturalism nor evolutionary theory is still not worked out or more importantly functional. Even what should be evolutions greatest and most widespread evidence, speciation in the fossil record is wholly absent. Remember complexity is code, information. Code doesn't magically write itself, nor can natural selection do such a thing it can only influence how genes express themselves. 99% of all species that have existed are extinct. Food for thought.
@shadhinov
@shadhinov 9 ай бұрын
"3.7 billion years of evolution has failed you" sounds like a great insult
@USBEN.
@USBEN. 6 жыл бұрын
I like to think that other creatures apart from us are in the earlier stages of their evolution and they too will evolve as an intelligent species one day . Well who knows , it makes me excited to think like that .
@ThePianofreaky
@ThePianofreaky 6 жыл бұрын
Evolution doesn't have a plan. It only makes creatures that don't reproduce disappear over time. (Which is kind of a tautology: Those who are good at ensuring their own existence continue to exist.)
@juanantoniovaldirimendez7819
@juanantoniovaldirimendez7819 6 жыл бұрын
That´s not the point of evolution. The force that drives evolution is natural selection and therefore one may say that bacteria are better prepared for the planet destruction, as you know they are resistant to radioactivity, temperatures above 158°F so in away they are better prepared for the race of evolution, one could say that we are the most complex phorm of life which is true for our genetix complexity, but to proove you how we weak we are we couldn´t survive without bacterias but they could easilly do so not all of them of course but without bacteria there wouldn´t be all of the complexes animal and plant phorms. But if you are thiking it in a romantical way then do so, but that´s not a scientifical fact.
@Wingedmagician
@Wingedmagician 6 жыл бұрын
What's almost as terrifying as us becoming extinct is us evolving into unconscious beings in the distant future.
@falkonerr
@falkonerr 6 жыл бұрын
Let's see, we don't know with certainty: - when and where the first cell formed (whether on Earth or elsewhere in the universe, and then got here by panspermia) - if single-cell organisms are present only on Earth or the whole solar system or the whole galaxy or the whole universe, and if they have all the same single origin. - the exact path leading from organic molecules to the first cell. - if bacteria and archaea were the only two kinds of prokaryotes, or if there were many others and then disappeared. - if eukaryotes evolved later than prokaryotes, or at the same time and then they engulfed prokaryotes later. - if multicellularity and sexual reproduction evolved at the same time as eukaryotes or later. - to what extent lateral genetic transfer contributed to evolution among single-cell organisms and viruses. - if viruses evolved before or after the first cells. - if pre-Cambrian life forms evolved at a different evolutionary rate than post-Cambrian life forms. - if the Gaia hypothesis is right or wrong. - how the gradualist and the saltationist views of evolution can be reconciled. - how to cope with criticism to genetic determinism. - the place of teleology in evolutionary theory. ... and I'm sure I'm forgetting many other insignificant details... (Yes, you're right, we know nothing for certain, except that we are just a huge family...)
@NickRoman
@NickRoman 6 жыл бұрын
Sure. Why not? Intelligence might not be that valuable to continued existence though. Life existed for billions of years without it. It hardly exists even among humans now. How many dunderheads are denying that any of this is true without even understanding it?
@DownhillAllTheWay
@DownhillAllTheWay Күн бұрын
I'm a bit unclear about how life got started. I understand that animal life evolved initially in the sea - perhaps around the thermal vents - but where did plants fit on that time line? Were there already plants on the land before the first animals crawled out of the sea? If so, did they evolve from underwater plants? I came across this channel while searching for the transition from plants to animals, to see how that happened. How about fungi - where to they fit on the time line?
@steff780
@steff780 6 жыл бұрын
He didn’t explain where it all started?
@eboysix
@eboysix 6 жыл бұрын
That's because we don't know.
@FALprofessional
@FALprofessional 6 жыл бұрын
Answer: hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, and 9.81 m/s.
@DJ-ov2it
@DJ-ov2it 6 жыл бұрын
That topic is one of its own. Abiogenesis. If you want to know how it all started, study biology and join the biologists to find out. You cant get every answer to every question in the universe handed to you. Humanity is still searching for the answer via science.
@steff780
@steff780 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for all the answers! I just find it hard to believe that our universe came from nothing.
@DJ-ov2it
@DJ-ov2it 6 жыл бұрын
That is another topic of its own. Physical cosmology deals with that, the prevailing theory being the Big Bang Theory. So in conclusion, evolution has nothing to do with the origin of the universe...
@redpower6956
@redpower6956 4 жыл бұрын
Very informative, your videos are amazing! Thank you so much for these quality videos.
@Masoudy91
@Masoudy91 4 жыл бұрын
Nice to see our ancestors who have not evolved yet. Like the fish, mice, monkeys and SpongeBob. Also, evidently, the ones who can not use iPhones these days :P
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
Nothing evolved, speciation is wholly absent from the fossil record...
@tomsPrivateVids
@tomsPrivateVids 7 ай бұрын
Very pleasant journey back through time. Slightly confusing though to have megatherium and hlaliosthere drawn seemingly as part of the chain.
@RafidW9
@RafidW9 6 жыл бұрын
in before all the creationists infest the comments section.
@LPVince94
@LPVince94 6 жыл бұрын
Alex Libman Dude they are 40% of the American population. The education problem is real. Don't deny it.
@mnamejacob9878
@mnamejacob9878 5 жыл бұрын
stonks
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
@@LPVince94 You say that while being wholly ignorant evolutionary theory is far from a functional worked out theory. In fact it's akin to pseudo science like the flat earth theory. Education truly is a problem as you mentioned ironically.
@dana-ce1vb
@dana-ce1vb Жыл бұрын
Does it mean that the whole living organisms including plants, animal world and human origin from that ONE ancient replicator cell? Thus does it mean that all living creatures are related to each other?
@pixelpulse883
@pixelpulse883 10 ай бұрын
yes and yes
@commenter4368
@commenter4368 3 күн бұрын
Yeah
@RimaNari
@RimaNari 6 жыл бұрын
Real enlightenment is not only when you accept scientific truths, but when you also accept scientific truths that are conflict with your world view.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
Evolutionary theory is far from a functional worked out theory just as a reminder.
@byomakeshmaharana8201
@byomakeshmaharana8201 6 жыл бұрын
Hey! Love your work! Can you also do the "Map of Philosophy"?
@mrtoodamngoodtoyou
@mrtoodamngoodtoyou 6 жыл бұрын
So far, 54 comments in, the best one is the dude rambling about aliens and the bible and some alien god thingy. Anybody want to try to top that?
@falkonerr
@falkonerr 6 жыл бұрын
Let's see, we don't know with certainty: - when and where the first cell formed (whether on Earth or elsewhere in the universe, and then got here by panspermia) - if single-cell organisms are present only on Earth or the whole solar system or the whole galaxy or the whole universe, and if they have all the same single origin. - the exact path leading from organic molecules to the first cell. - if bacteria and archaea were the only two kinds of prokaryotes, or if there were many others and then disappeared. - if eukaryotes evolved later than prokaryotes, or at the same time and then they engulfed prokaryotes later. - if multicellularity and sexual reproduction evolved at the same time as eukaryotes or later. - to what extent lateral genetic transfer contributed to evolution among single-cell organisms and viruses. - if viruses evolved before or after the first cells. - if pre-Cambrian life forms evolved at a different evolutionary rate than post-Cambrian life forms. - if the Gaia hypothesis is right or wrong. - how the gradualist and the saltationist views of evolution can be reconciled. - how to cope with criticism to genetic determinism. - the place of teleology in evolutionary theory. ... and I'm sure I'm forgetting many other insignificant details... (Yes, you're right, we know nothing for certain, except that we are just a huge family...)
@josemariaruiz1879
@josemariaruiz1879 9 ай бұрын
Fun fact: the first life organism ever was LUCA, or Last Universal Common Ancestor. Like if you already knew.
@Dr.Ian-Plect
@Dr.Ian-Plect 4 ай бұрын
"Fun fact: the first life organism ever was LUCA, or Last Universal Common Ancestor. Like if you already knew." - it isn't
@josemariaruiz1879
@josemariaruiz1879 Ай бұрын
@@Dr.Ian-Plect Then what is it
@Dr.Ian-Plect
@Dr.Ian-Plect Ай бұрын
@@josemariaruiz1879 "Last Universal Common Ancestor" - this is not the first common ancestor of all life, just the most recent common ancestor of all life - what you defined was UCA
@adityakarn4361
@adityakarn4361 6 жыл бұрын
Amazing Video! Keep it up. ;)
@Christ-or-Chaos
@Christ-or-Chaos 5 жыл бұрын
What blows my mind is that people can believe that a 3 billion character self-replicating code like DNA can form from natural processes.
@robertoandreamadonna6025
@robertoandreamadonna6025 5 жыл бұрын
who created god?
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
@@robertoandreamadonna6025 There is no need. God exists independent of our universe thus already exists in more than one dimension of time. If time has a length and a width God is uncreated. Who created your creator, the universe? Big bang tells us the universe had a finite start. There is no cyclical/eternal universe to get out of this. The multiverse theory is also bound to this fact.
@HersheyandStuff
@HersheyandStuff 6 жыл бұрын
Just recently discovered your channel and I love it! This video was great and I can't wait to see more!
@yashashwisidharth1088
@yashashwisidharth1088 6 жыл бұрын
49 dislikes are from creationists
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
And literate scientists.
@philosopherhobbs
@philosopherhobbs 6 жыл бұрын
Existing complex forms aren't due to competition and environmental pressure. New forms only arise due to mutation. Competition and environmental pressure just kill all the other things off. It's not like some environmental feature magically makes an animal change in a certain way. Mutation introduces the change, which just happens to sometimes make an organism more fit in the environment it happens to be in.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
The change from mutation is degradation of genetics not added code. It does not lead to evolution but extinction. Naturalistic process cannot produce information. The lack of speciation in the fossil record says it all.
@GetDookied
@GetDookied 6 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: The Christian pope believes in evolutions so you guys have no excuse for your ignorance ( I’m sure you will find a way tho )
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
That means nothing when it contradicts fundamental scriptural doctrine lol. The Pope has zero authority to counter that.
@daddust
@daddust 3 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure I don’t have giant horse in my DNA.
@Albalam
@Albalam 6 жыл бұрын
It's funny because it's not true at all.. you're just talking about the Darwin theory, it is just a theory.. man Go look to the scientists who criticize the Darwin theory of evolution, in fact there are many scientists disagreed with this theory
@aristerosgiatros8742
@aristerosgiatros8742 6 жыл бұрын
Theory in science is an observed hypothesis, something proven. And this about the scientists who don't agree on evolution is your assumption, every scientist has come to the concensus that evolution is a fact.
@je740
@je740 5 жыл бұрын
AZIZ for a scientist to disagree with evolution they have to make a scientific discovery that disagrees with evolution. If someone doesnt believe in evolution just due to their opinions then they are not working in the capacity of a "scientist"
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
@@aristerosgiatros8742 Evolutionary theory is far from a functional worked out theory. No many scientists see the inherent issues with evolutionary theory and have not accepted it. It is basically akin to pseudo science.
@sammonroe3985
@sammonroe3985 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for making this. Crazy to be here, alive.
@MarkFilipAnthony
@MarkFilipAnthony 6 жыл бұрын
Here's another misconception busted: We are STILL evolving guys!! We are not "the end" of the chain of evolution. Humans, or what we define as human today is still changeing and adapting over time, evolving to something new depending on our environment, as long as life exsist on earth evolution Never ends
@Sonnentau1
@Sonnentau1 6 жыл бұрын
Yes you are "the end" if you fail to reproduce...
@MarkFilipAnthony
@MarkFilipAnthony 6 жыл бұрын
Sonnentau1 nono, ure only "the end" if ure the last species on earth that is a live and u fail to reproduce, and that's ONLY if u assume that life as we know it doesn't exsists or stop exsisting in other parts of the universe, Also all plants, bacteria fugus are part of evolution
@key0512
@key0512 6 жыл бұрын
In case of humans natural selection doesn't take place anymore, therefore no natural way to evolve. Animals still evolve though, as long as we don't wipe them out.
@eboysix
@eboysix 6 жыл бұрын
Yep they just take a different branch
@ujjvalkulkarni1833
@ujjvalkulkarni1833 6 жыл бұрын
Ariana There are four other ways to evolve besides natural selection. They don't provide adaptations tho.
@paulakoehler959
@paulakoehler959 6 жыл бұрын
Great material so wonderfully displayed!
@Faustobellissimo
@Faustobellissimo 6 жыл бұрын
Except, everything that happened to life in pre-Cambrian periods is highly speculative and controversial.
@gbeziuk
@gbeziuk 6 жыл бұрын
Speculative? Sure. Controversial? Not so much. Maybe in relatively insignificant details, not in the primary perspective of all the biosphere being just a huge family.
@Faustobellissimo
@Faustobellissimo 6 жыл бұрын
Insignificant details??? Let's see, we don't know with certainty: - when and where the first cell formed (whether on Earth or elsewhere in the universe, and then got here by panspermia) - if single-cell organisms are present only on Earth or the whole solar system or the whole galaxy or the whole universe, and if they have all the same single origin. - the exact path leading from organic molecules to the first cell. - if bacteria and archaea were the only two kinds of prokaryotes, or if there were many others and then disappeared. - if eukaryotes evolved later than prokaryotes, or at the same time and then they engulfed prokaryotes later. - if multicellularity and sexual reproduction evolved at the same time as eukaryotes or later. - to what extent lateral genetic transfer contributed to evolution among single-cell organisms and viruses. - if viruses evolved before or after the first cells. - if pre-Cambrian life forms evolved at a different evolutionary rate than post-Cambrian life forms. - if the Gaia hypothesis is right or wrong. - how the gradualist and the saltationist views of evolution can be reconciled. - how to cope with criticism to genetic determinism. - the place of teleology in evolutionary theory. ... and I'm sure I'm forgetting many other insignificant details... (Yes, you're right, we know nothing for certain, except that we are just a huge family...)
@gbeziuk
@gbeziuk 6 жыл бұрын
I like your list of questions. Questions are good, and well-defined questions are perfect. They are bread, butter and the caviar of science. However, they are still relatively insignificant, just as I said, compared to the fact of evolution. Which is pretty much the only big idea this video aimed to display, I guess. Besides, some of your questions may be just questions of formulations, not of phenomenas.
@Faustobellissimo
@Faustobellissimo 6 жыл бұрын
I think you're underestimating the consequences of being unable to answer these questions. And the worst thing is that, at this rate, we will probaby never be able to answer these questions. But instead of panicking and trying to find a way out, popular science indulges in over-enthusiastic reviews of what has been blatantly obvious for 200 years: evolution from a single ancestor. Can science move beyond that and tackle the real issues?
@falkonerr
@falkonerr 6 жыл бұрын
Evolution is alie
@luiscremonini3635
@luiscremonini3635 3 жыл бұрын
Far far far from reality and complexity of natural evolution. But, even so, is a great step forward to start thinkink on this subject. Thanks for your wonderful job.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
It's so complex that to date it still appears statistically impossible and wholly absent from the fossil record! Evolutionary theory is like the flat earth theory of the 20th century.
@jaredr4125
@jaredr4125 6 жыл бұрын
Evolution - The newest religion So much faith is needed for this worldview
@IWantToStayAtYourHouse
@IWantToStayAtYourHouse 6 жыл бұрын
Its not a religion. its fact
@NickRoman
@NickRoman 6 жыл бұрын
jaredr4125 , You only say that because it is a current popular talking point of Christian apologists (or whatever you want to call that). It doesn't represent understanding of anything. It's what they constantly do: grasp at any quip that sounds pithy to prop up an ultimately irrational position. Learn.
@je740
@je740 5 жыл бұрын
jaredr4125 evolution is a theory formed by discoveries
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
@@IWantToStayAtYourHouse It's not fact. Evolutionary theory is far from even being a functional worked out theory!!!
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
@@NickRoman Science doesn't support evolutionary theories assertions either. The whole thing is pseudo science. It's scientifically absurd.
@DelSolGaming
@DelSolGaming 4 жыл бұрын
its very inspiring to see that my whole genetic makeup is made from WINNING, and more WINNING I will do
@preyped
@preyped 6 жыл бұрын
29 creationists don't like this video
@vivasreno
@vivasreno 6 жыл бұрын
Pablo Rey Pedrosa
@challeballe2511
@challeballe2511 3 ай бұрын
not even 10 seconds in and he busts out the "your mother"
@joemom2671
@joemom2671 6 жыл бұрын
ATHEIST PROPAGANDA! /s
@greenytaddict
@greenytaddict 6 жыл бұрын
This has nothing to do with atheism but nice try
@will14n5
@will14n5 6 жыл бұрын
Only if you think that the truth is in accord with atheism.
@achrafabid6682
@achrafabid6682 6 жыл бұрын
Beautiful video, can you make a video about human evolution 😁 plllz I don’t understand it very well 😁😁🙏🏻🙏🏻
@everythingeverything8627
@everythingeverything8627 Ай бұрын
This is great but I’m disappointed you added the chalicothere and megatherium. I thought this is meant to be the homo-sapiens phylogenetic branch? I was gonna put this poster on my wall 😭
@RukiAlvarez
@RukiAlvarez 4 жыл бұрын
Is more mind blowing when you realise most of the animals that ever existed are extinct
@RoboMWM
@RoboMWM 6 жыл бұрын
Key point is this video states "common ancestor," not that we necessarily directly descended from such. Either way, evolution of the material body is compatible with Christianity (at least for Catholics).
@jy1733
@jy1733 6 жыл бұрын
Too bad that the Tree of Life (/ Common Descent) doctrine is a fiction according to Richard Dawkins and Craig Venter. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hJ9oZ7ZqvJ26lH0.html
@RoboMWM
@RoboMWM 6 жыл бұрын
I guess you just read the word "Christianity" and immediately thought I was a creationist supporter or something... also, I'm sure just shouting out a scientist's name as implying something is proved to be false isn't sufficient but ayyy it's an easy thing to do I guess
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
Can't be. The text explicitly shows man is direct creation. There was a first man, and this is of great importance as the biological lineage is traced from Eve directly to Mary to fulfill the prophecy God gave to Satan after the fall of man that the seed of the woman would bruise his head.
@79s130
@79s130 8 ай бұрын
You, as a Human, Can be Classified as a Lobe-Finned Fish.
@kuteninja
@kuteninja 6 жыл бұрын
I still don't understand why most people are interested in preserving species, biodiversity and such. From my point of view, extinction is also an important part of evolution, even if it's forced by the human hand and machinery, it forces the rest of the species to either evolve and survive the "human uprising" or simply cease to exist eventually. Tell me what you think about this. For instance, if any particular specie is not viable for any given reason, let's say their horns are being harvested for money, then they will eventually evolve without that particular gene to stop producing tusks, or they will just disappear altogether, thus forcing the humans to "evolve" (very slightly) and find a new thing to harvest and exchange for money (pretty much what's going to happen with petroleum once it runs out, except that it comes from already dead and fossilized animals/plants, and not alive ones)
@ThatCrazyKid0007
@ThatCrazyKid0007 6 жыл бұрын
Emiliano Perez the problem is evolution is a very slow process, in your example humans will kill off an entire animal species for its goods long before evolution can take effect, and that is just the initial issue Biodiversity is important because ecosystems are very delicate systems. Killing off species can start a chain of events that can damange or destroy an entire ecosystem and all of its inhabitats with it (see coral reefs for example). If you aren't careful what you kill off, chances are it can lead to you getting killed off yourself down the line
@lameduck1690
@lameduck1690 6 жыл бұрын
We, as a species, determine how we preserve other species. This is a part of evolution; symbiosis.
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 2 жыл бұрын
@@ThatCrazyKid0007 It's so slow we don't see it happening today. And so fast we don't see the speciation in the fossil record!
@erinys2
@erinys2 Жыл бұрын
We dont preserve species for funzies we need them to exist for the eco system
@georgedanielsummersell8464
@georgedanielsummersell8464 Ай бұрын
You are the living ancestor of your children.
@RedShiftMusic
@RedShiftMusic 4 жыл бұрын
Do plants and animals have a common ancestor too if you go back far enough?
@domainofscience
@domainofscience 4 жыл бұрын
Yes they do as they contain similar kinds of cells with the DNA contained in a nucleus. Technically plants and animals are eukaryotes along with fungi and protozoa. So all these domains of life must have come from the same cell roughly 2 billion years ago.
@RedShiftMusic
@RedShiftMusic 4 жыл бұрын
@@domainofscience Wow. Simply astounding the many forms DNA can take. It's been on my mind a lot latley. Thank you for the great videos!
@falkonerr
@falkonerr 6 жыл бұрын
“The Overriding Supremacy of the Myth” In recent years some scientists have raised serious doubts about the viability of the theory of evolution as expressed by Charles Darwin. This is especially true of molecular biologists. In his book Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Michael Denton, a researcher in biology, wrote: “The raising of the status of Darwinian theory to a self-evident axiom has had the consequence that the very real problems and objections with which Darwin so painfully laboured in the Origin have become entirely invisible. Crucial problems such as the absence of connecting links or the difficulty of envisaging intermediate forms are virtually never discussed and the creation of even the most complex of adaptations is put down to natural selection without a ripple of doubt.” He continues: “The overriding supremacy of the myth has created a widespread illusion that the theory of evolution was all but proved one hundred years ago . . . Nothing could be further from the truth.”-Page 77. “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.”-Origin of Species, Charles Darwin, page 154. “As the number of unexplained, irreducibly complex biological systems increases, our confidence that Darwin’s criterion of failure has been met skyrockets toward the maximum that science allows.” (Darwin’s Black Box-The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, Michael J. Behe, pages 39-40) In other words, recent findings in the field of molecular biology raise serious doubts about Darwin’s theory. “The result of [the] cumulative efforts to investigate the cell-to investigate life at the molecular level-is a loud, clear, piercing cry of ‘design!’ The result is so unambiguous and so significant that it must be ranked as one of the greatest achievements in the history of science. The discovery rivals those of Newton and Einstein, Lavoisier and Schrödinger, Pasteur, and Darwin. The observation of the intelligent design of life is as momentous as the observation that the earth goes around the sun.”-Darwin’s Black Box, pages 232-3.
@michaelanderson7715
@michaelanderson7715 2 жыл бұрын
- PhD zoologist here; I'd love to see your thoughts transferred into peer-reviewed, accepted science. The idea of evolution being ditched as a theory is intriguing...GET ON IT!
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
@@michaelanderson7715 Marcel Cardillo et al., “Multiple Causes of High Extinction Risk in Large Mammal Species" Presents how the logistics alone are so absurd going over virtually ever mammal known it's impossible for evolution to produce any mammal over 3kg, roughly 7 pounds. This being quite conservative mind you. The whole concept of evolutionary theory is nonsensical from a logistics perspective.
@KidEatingClown
@KidEatingClown 6 жыл бұрын
Isn't the "gorilla horse" called a chalicothere, not a haliocthere? You're missing two letters.
@Tombalino
@Tombalino 6 жыл бұрын
i guess it does in fact make sense that 2:49 is the most recent common ancestor between humans and mr squarepants
@apaksoy
@apaksoy 6 жыл бұрын
Loved this video. Thx very much for doing it!
@sneha_gupta07s
@sneha_gupta07s 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot ,for such kind of information , please make detailed videos on DNA including all animals of Animal Kingdom
@jamesbarry1673
@jamesbarry1673 5 ай бұрын
Wonderful 👍 thanks for the information 😊
@hawaii-easterunion9221
@hawaii-easterunion9221 2 жыл бұрын
I edited this message, here's two things i learned from 10 months of my experience in life : 1. I shouldn't believe things too early 2. I shouldn't be too childish
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Жыл бұрын
lmao what? There isn't even any speciation in the fossil record... kinda early to assume humans evolved period when the theory isn't even functional.
@VashTheDamnFiend
@VashTheDamnFiend Жыл бұрын
And the fact you so readily believe this bs without question is mind blowing to me
@ijebusjebus
@ijebusjebus 6 жыл бұрын
such a gem of a channel!
@ArneJohanssonMpls
@ArneJohanssonMpls 6 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thanks for making it.
@frydenx
@frydenx Ай бұрын
thats fucking mind blowing fr
@DentfreeEurope
@DentfreeEurope Жыл бұрын
Every Animal In Your DNA Abusing, exploiting, using and consuming any other beings, is actually doing all that to our own ancestors. It's just plain ignorance if anyone does it, but if anyone realises this, and still does it, then there's absolutely something really deeply concerning about them.
@DentfreeEurope
@DentfreeEurope Жыл бұрын
We all need to post more often these confrontational posts and comments, it will help more people that are ready to receive them, to speed up a little more this extremely important realisation in them too, making them open up, and be more able to place themselves in others position, no matter their size, shape, color or species. 💚🌱 Although we human animals can never return to be as pure and as innocent as non human animals still are, because they are all still genuinely so pure and innocent as they've always been, we've lost that, when we've gained more self awareness, and started asking ourselves question about the entire existance, what is life, who made what, and who is who. For us human animals to regain that pureness and innocence we once had long ago, is impossible, because we're aware of it. But we have the advantage, (at least for those that realise this), we cannot live as we were doing before, in total blissfulness, as we did a long time ago, naturally, in purity and innocence, to be at one with nature, because we've reached an increasing advanced point in our evolution as a human species, we can't stay under natures laws, in innocence and purity forever, we have to take responsibility into our own hands, to carefully take what we need, to evolve the way we need to, but at the same time, we also have to learn to live alongside nature, be less arrogant, intrusive, invasive, pollutive and destructive. ⚡💫💚🌱
@commenter4368
@commenter4368 3 күн бұрын
@@DentfreeEuropeFinally, I found someone who shares the same views as me. I wholeheartedly agree with you.
@warren286
@warren286 5 жыл бұрын
Apparently the Greeks had it right. It seems the first lifeforms evolved out of clay.
@exxzxxe
@exxzxxe Жыл бұрын
A brilliant video- well done!
@kurt6497
@kurt6497 2 жыл бұрын
In the opening of the video and in the description you are confusing ancestor with descendant.
@alexisscarbrough4083
@alexisscarbrough4083 4 жыл бұрын
Beautiful to see how very special I really am. I'm a miracle.
@myasterr
@myasterr 4 күн бұрын
If tiktaalik was 375m years ago, there must have been youtoobik arnd 500m years ago ago
@angeloriggi6370
@angeloriggi6370 Жыл бұрын
I've put this 4 billion year old story into a minimal amount of words for my son's, took me hours + they lose interest in 4 minutes.. this guy,,,wrapped it up in 3:56 holy heck 🎉ty my friend
@Fastbusinessfunds
@Fastbusinessfunds 7 ай бұрын
How did I make it to this section of KZfaq
The Surprising Map of Plants
19:55
Domain of Science
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
managed to catch #tiktok
00:16
Анастасия Тарасова
Рет қаралды 48 МЛН
Before VS during the CONCERT 🔥 "Aliby" | Andra Gogan
00:13
Andra Gogan
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Prank vs Prank #shorts
00:28
Mr DegrEE
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
You Use Quantum Physics to Smell
9:24
Domain of Science
Рет қаралды 200 М.
The Two People We're All Related To
9:32
PBS Eons
Рет қаралды 4,2 МЛН
Every Thing in Space
13:01
Domain of Science
Рет қаралды 618 М.
Why Is There Only One Species of Human? - Robin May
59:22
Gresham College
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
Were We Wrong About The Last Common Ancestor?
14:12
Stefan Milo
Рет қаралды 742 М.
You've Been Lied To About Genetics
14:13
SubAnima
Рет қаралды 906 М.
Evo-Ed: History, Genetics, and Human Skin Color
8:13
Evo-Ed
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
4.5 Billion Years in 1 Hour
1:03:31
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
The Map of Doom | Apocalypses Ranked
21:32
Domain of Science
Рет қаралды 731 М.
managed to catch #tiktok
00:16
Анастасия Тарасова
Рет қаралды 48 МЛН