What happened to him?

@@Zdiot Life happens as is for everyone, but we will never see this kind of team fro Chelsea ever gain, the old Guard.

Not to mention Mikel who was one of the best players that year

@@513jonelmao he wasnt at all. The best players were Drogba, Lampard, Malouda, Cech, Terry, Cole, Anelka, Ivanovic, Balladk, Essien, Carvalho. If you gonna say mikel were one of the best then you can also just say Kalou was to.

@@hypello9534 Mikel was solid

Now can’t even score 3 haha

Literally the worst title winning Chelsea team....least points, most losses. Relied heavily on bad refereeing decisions. If the ref was fair they mostly struggled.

@@FootkerSnookball oh shut it muppet, Drogba scored 30goals got the golden boot, Lampard finished with 21goals most of a midfielder. Goals flew left right center. Yes, 2005 is the best chelsea title winning team ever. but 2010 wasnt lucky

@@kaypakaipa8559 lol now take out goals vs teams with numerical disadvantage, soft pens, offsides, fluke crosses, wrongly awarded freekicks, deliberate opposition backpasses on penultimate game etc...wasn't so impressive now was it. For all the goals Chelsea scored they still had to cheat home & away vs ManUtd to stand any chance of the title. Chelsea 1-0 ManUtd Nov2009 refereed unsurprisingly by Martin Atkinson denied AntonioValencia a stonewall pen at 0-0 when JT fouled him ref had great view, Rooney was also clean through ONside at 0-0 and flagged offside. Chelsea's late winner should've been disallowed for no fewer than 3 reasons. Shouldn't have been a freekick Cashley dived as per usual, Drogba shoved down WesBrown in the box WHILST standing in offside position effecting VanDerSar's view as freekick is swung all the way in, confusion with who got the final touch at the time, they gave goal to JT. ManUtd who on paper weren't even as good as they'd been for about 5 years and were still the best team judging by most records that season. You find me a season ManUtd have resorted to this to win any of their 13 PL's. For all the goals Chelsea scored they still had the same number of wins as ManUtd and interestingly the same number of wins by only a ONE goal margin as ManUtd (even with those ManUtd's wins by 1 goal were more comfortable than Chelsea's if you compare both). In fact going into the penultimate round ManUtd had more wins by 2 or more goals than Chelsea did and then Liverpool threw their last home game vs Chelsea because it was the first year ManUtd could overtake Liverpool on overall league title's hence Gerrard's backpass to Drogba at 0-0 before Chelsea had created anything. Pity Liverpool won at all costs when ManUtd came to Anfield that season (another controversial ManUtd defeat I might add, Carragher got away with 2 last man fouls etc...). Liverpool admit they didn't want anything from that Chelsea game and they didn't have anything to play for themselves by then finished 7th and trophyless so that was all they could do but Chelsea still bragged about that mediocre team gifting them a win and cheating home&away vs ManUtd so they could say they got 100% record vs the "Big4" Liverpool saw the Top4 ONCE from after XabiAlonso left them summer 2009 to 2016, once in 7 seasons (2013/14). Despite being cheated home&away vs Chelsea it was in fact ManUtd who did the best vs the top teams, finished top of the head-to-head table of the top6 teams (and even more clear of Chelsea in the Top5 table). Chelsea lost to Spurs and home&away to ManCity including 2-4 at Stamford bridge. ManUtd beat 3rd Arsenal, 4th Spurs & 5th ManCity all home&away. Also had a near perfect record vs the teams fighting for survival 14th to 20th, 13 wins out of 14 and the one game they didn't win was Burnley's first ever home game in PL which is unique circumstances carnival atmosphere and Burnley's goal was one you'd more expect from a top4 team which made it a struggle. Chelsea struggled home&away to Hull who got relegated although they took 4pts both from losing positions but the home win on the opening day was from a wrongly awarded freekick equaliser & fluke Cross winner in stoppage-time. Chelsea also lost away to Wigan whom ManUtd had beat 0-5 & 5-0 (both 11 vs 11, Chelsea thrashed Wigan at home but scored 7 vs 10 men) which despite Chelsea bragging about scoring so many they didn't have an aggregate scoreline as big as that vs anyone in PL. Their biggest aggregate margin was 8 goals vs Stoke and even that again like Wigan was during the final 3 games and people knew of Chelsea go on to win it's only going to be by 1 point AFTER cheating ManUtd home&away so they need FAKE emphatic goal difference to paper of the controversy. Even vs Stoke Kalou early on should've been red carded for 2 footed lunge on Stoke's GK who ended up getting injured so they needed to play inexperienced keeper instead and Kalou was rewarded because his goal still stood. Before the last 3 games the table was same points difference (1) but there was only 3GD in it (Meaning had ManUtd not been denied what they deservedvs Chelsea then ManUtd would already be champions with 3 games to spare AND better GD than Chelsea) then ManUtd won a further 3 games and increased their GD by another +7 but Chelsea still gained a further 10GD on ManUtd in the last 3 games?? Very fishy. ManUtd had best defence ManUtd had most away wins ManUtd had GD worthy of the title and it was REAL not Chelsea's fake GD to disguise them as worthy winners after the controvesial manner they squeezed ahead of ManUtd. ManUtd had more away wins by 2 or more goals than Chelsea Likewise by 3 or more Chelsea had only 1 more win by 4 or more than ManUtd but ManUtd had more away by 4 or more than Chelsea. Both Chelsea & ManUtd had only won away win by 5 or more (Both 0-5) ManUtd's against 16th, Chelsea's was against rock bottom Portsmouth. So further proof these extra goals thet brag about were just unimportant goals at home vs weaker teams increasing a margin vs numerical disadvantaged teams with everything on Chelsea's side. If Chelsea were so great they wouldn't have followed that season with 2 weak PL campaigns where they finished 6th in one and would've finished about there in 2010/11 as well if they again weren't bailed out by the refs, yes they shouldn't have even qualified for the first CL they won. They were outside top4 before another MartinAtkinson shitshow March 1st 2011 vs ManUtd yet again being given the same fixture he wrecked last time and outdid himself Chelsea went on a run to get them top4 and they also scored 3 illegal goals vs eventual 5th Spurs home&away from legitimate losing positions to get a draw & win which alone swung 9pts unfairly in their favour for a top4 place. ManUtd won a cup in 09/10 with a tough route including 3 teams who finished in the top6 and that doesn't include beating another solid PL team Wolves with 10 men. ManUtd were way better than Chelsea with 10 men and Chelsea should've found themselves in that situation a lot more than they did but whenever they did they always struggled. ManUtd beat Spurs in PL 1-3 with the 3rd scored with 10 vs Spurs's 11. Chelsea had easy FAcup route (like other years they won I.e 2012 etc...) and the 1 game hard team they faced in the semi's HowardWebb produced a MartinAtkinson style performance to get Chelsea over the line like Atkinson has done for them in countless big games he officiated for Chelsea which shouldn't have been allowed even if he was fair let alone corrupt it should've been shared out, but you name a big game they played from 2007 to 2019 in particular and he was refereeing it nearly every time including many cup latter stages 4 FAcup SF's and last game of PL season where they need to win to win the title and top2 head-to-heads and big4 or big6 head-to-heads where they need a result he always gave it to them and also FAcup QF replay, LeagueCup SF 2nd leg at Stamford bridge etc...he finally quits when Abramovic quits Chelsea 🤨 The ghost goal vs Spurs SF 2012 WTF???? He tried to also win Chelsea the FAcup in 2008 when he favoured Portsmouth against ManUtd at OldTrafford in QF so then Chelsea would be stong favourites it's just he didn't know Barnsley would later that day beat Chelsea so he inadvertently made Portsmouth huge favourites instead but the intent was obvious. Chelsea only did the best vs the mid-table teams with less to play for and as mentioned some even threw the matches. Chelsea only won in 2009/10 because the PL desperately didn't want the same champion for a 4th consecutive season it's branded the best most exciting & unpredictable league in the World, same champion every year doesn't promote that and hence why Chelsea were favoured all season not just with decision but also fixture scheduling, referee appointments for extra important games of theirs etc...and still should've lost it. Before VAR you could make the best team not win the title it happened against ManUtd also in 97/98 not as corruptly as Chelsea 09/10 though but ManCity might be allowed to get 4 in a row now with VAR because they only have to be the best now. Even that 09/10 ManUtd team who as previously mentioned was weaker on paper without Cristiano & Tevez they still would've won by a record points margin if they'd been given HALF the help Chelsea got. So like I said I say this was the worst title winning team Chelsea had because they clearly weren't even the best team that season, although they bought even the others they won I'd still say they were the best team in 2005 for example. Did I think they were really impressive even there no they never were really impressive like ManUtd & ManCity can be for example. They could only win convincingly points wise by loads of narrow wins small team tactics to get many 1-0's and when Chelsea di score loads they barely win the title 09/10. They couldn't have a season where they did both in the same season like ManUtd & ManCity have done. ManUtd were by far the best team in Britain for 5 straight seasons 2006/07 to 2010/11 winning 4 out of 5 but if they were allowed to win more than 3 in a row they would've won all 5 and judging on CL record in same period certainly in the top2 in Europe. THE best in the World 2008 and still hold the CL unbeaten run record to this day. Even the other 2 CL finals 08/09 & 10/11 unbeaten again until the final vs the greatest ever club team and also won both of those PL seasons at the same time as well.

@@FootkerSnookball Bro are you serious? You wrote 6paragraphs, this is ridiculous. Chelsea was the best team of that Year. Referees cheated everywhere, Man Utd cheated against Man City at Old Trafford 8added minutes from where? Refs used to be paid of all the time by United. Chelsea where the best and won. Not our fault others failed to capitalize

No vintage was when he could win things with clubs without a series of controversial & disgraceful decisions.

Even forgot Joe Cole!

As many different scorers as ManUtd 2012/13? Didn't think so.

It was an incredible finish

me to man

Man United was unstoppable, you won the league because we sold Tevez and Cristiano. Imagine what happened if we had just one the two I mentioned.

​@@endojack92falacy

@@emmanuelhenry219 I just said the truth dude.

@@endojack92 two players can't make a team,so that's never an excuse

@@endojack92 "man united was unstoppable, you stopped us because..." that doesn't work , now im not gonna deny you were out most formiddable opponent , but we were way better than you and any other team

You don't know what your talking about mate.

Best ever? They were a fluke cross not going in away from ManUtd winning 4 in a row....or they were a StevenGerrard not deciding to do a deliberate backpass to Drogba away from that....or if just 1 of the millions of decisions Chelsea got that season weren't given then Chelsea don't scrape the title by a pitiful margin.

So how come they didn't win the PL properly then? They won because the PL wanted a new champion as ManUtd were taking the piss out of everyone lol

Every offside position?

You're not a ManUtd fan nor a knowledgeable football fan.

Seems we are always lucky with free agents,Thaigo silva proves it

Don't even remind me 😥

Don't be fooled by the goal tally, Chelsea were given the 7-0 & 8-0 in the last 3 games to help disguise the controversy of the title win. It looks like it did work with a lot of fools on these comments pages but anyone who actually followed that season knows it was corrupt. With just 3 games to go there was only 1 point & 3GD separating Chelsea & ManUtd (AFTER Chelsea were given 2 wins vs ManUtd that with VAR would've been 2 easy wins for ManUtd so ManUtd would've already been champions again with weeks to spare but the PL didn't want same champion 4 times in a row despite ManUtd being clearly the best team 5 years in a row 2006/07 to 2010/11) ManUtd then WON their final 3 games & added a further 7GD to their tally. If anything they should've gained on Chelsea but as the league knew if Chelsea win it would only be by 1 point due to controversially climbing above ManUtd they instead gave them loads of goals so they strangley gained 10GD on ManUtd in those final 3 games vs Stoke, Liverpool & Wigan where Chelsea added +17GD to their tally which is very unlike Chelsea in any other season to be anywhere near half that tally and the 2 surrounding seasoms for example Chelsea only narrowly beat Wigan & Stoke at home they were teams that ManUtd would win comfortablly against but it was "real" scorelines like 4-0 etc...The match inbetween the 7-0 & 8-0 where Chelsea were given millions of decisions (Kalou 2 footed injured Stoke GK but his goal in that incident still stood, soft pens, other fouls in build-up to goals vs Wigan etc...etc...) the Anfield fixture inbetween those 2, bare in mind another factor that particular season was that it was the first year ManUtd could go above Liverpool on overall title's so even the fixture scheduling favoured Chelsea that year Liverpool had nothing to play for by then and didn't want to be overtaken by ManUtd hence Gerrard's deliberate backpass to Drogba at 0-0. Liverpool won at all costs when ManUtd played that fixture (incidentally another game that ManUtd still would've won with VAR but Liverpool still tried & won at all costs and tried hard at OldTrafford as well took the lead where as they literally threw their home game vs Chelsea) so they match fixed and it was a fake title win. Think about it, ManUtd had a better away record vs Chelsea that season (unsurprisingly because you don't get favoured anywhere near as much away) and up until that fake 0-2 win for Chelsea at Anfield on penultimate game, Chelsea had fewer wins by 2 or more goals than ManUtd did but because of that fix Chelsea finished on same number of wins by 2 or more as ManUtd (but ManUtd still had more wins by 2 or more away than Chelsea did). If ManUtd got half the help Chelsea got that season they break a points margin record. ManUtd were the best team as I said in Britain 2006/07 to 2010/11, they were also Top2 in the World same time period judging on ChampionsLeague record (still hold CL unbeaten game record to this day) undoubtedly THE best in the world in 2008.

Not as many different scorers as ManUtd 2012/13. 1of many records ManUtd hold.

Why did it get the lowest points tally out of all Chelsea PL title's then?? Not to mention they didn't even manage a draw in any CL knockout game that season.

@@FootkerSnookball it’s just my opinion scored the most goals of any of our title winning teams and we were knocked out by the winners of the CL that year

Man Utd goal was handball too

​@@abdifitaaxyare8569What a poor comeback lol "We got a million decisions, but you had 1 decision which should've been handball so it's even" 🤔 Did you allow Barca 2008/09 the excuse that it wasn't fixed because Barca got a red card? I bet you didn't. Well imagine how ManUtd feel then because BOTH head-to-heads were fixed fot Chelsea to win in 2009/10 and ManUtd would've won both even if they did have 10 men as long as all the penalty & offside howlers weren't made but Chelsea had all those decisions and ManUtd didn't even get a Chelsea player sent off either unlike Chelsea vs Barca with Barca's red. ManUtd were by far the best team for 5 straight seasons 2006/07 to 2010/11 but they felt they had to give Chelsea the one to deny the 4 in a row as the PL is branded best most unpredictable league in the world and the same winner 4 seasons in a row looks boring instead. Even StevenGerrard had to match fix the penultimate game though, like that help with decisions Chelsea had all year wasn't even enough for Chelsea to do the rest of the job themselves. So the fixture scheduling also played a big part not just decisions as Liverpool had nothing to play for by that Chelsea game apart from stopping ManUtd going above Liverpool on overall title's (it was the first year that was possible, hence Gerrard's deliberate backpass to Drogba at 0-0 when Chelsea had created nothing themselves).

Your very last comment is correct. Therefore it's surprising you'd say that but still think this is Chelsea's best team? They got a million decisions on their side and yet they were only 1 bad decision not given for them away from not winning the title.

Yeah the VAR system knew your tactics and prevented such controversy but it wasn't the following season that came into play. Chelsea would be allowed to cheat their way to several more trophies even after 2009/10 which was bad enough.

Apart from StevenGerrard's deliberate one to Drogba on the penultimate game.

Chelsea had like 2 shots in total away to Barca 2008/09 and I think less shots overall even in the Stamford bridge game but a couple more on target vs 10 men wow lol