Derp just realized I forgot to include the Danes/Norwegians in this globe. Obviously I want to see some viking action in my AOE4 as well. They're the civ I'd predict to be the most likely new addition in the next expansion. I even made a full high effort ass video on them too - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nL2capx3zsm1Yps.html
@fernyrespi81097 ай бұрын
Can you think of a good idea for the philippines?
@tendaii957 ай бұрын
They should Call it the Skandinaviens .A Alliance between danes/norway/sweden. Civ based on Aggression/Trade/Raid. Castle Age should be a Splitt. Just like the Mecenary House from the Byz. WEST NORTH EAST. West is for France Normandy ..north for England and east for Russ/varangian .. cuz norway and danes focus more on France and England while Sweden Establish the Kiev Russ and in fact are even the Varangain Guard from the Byz.
@royasturias17847 ай бұрын
@@fernyrespi8109The Philippines before Imperial Spanish intervention had been composed of a bunch of loose kingdoms, chiefdoms, sultanates and other isolated nations with one Chinese trading town.
@fernyrespi81097 ай бұрын
@@royasturias1784 well i think we could brew some sort of system using the barangay as basis, tbh i just wanted to makr them into sea faring people that their known to be.
@lucarioAK7 ай бұрын
I hope the aoe 4 devs are watching this
@Darth03087 ай бұрын
I would have been better for them to add civs instead of better alternates to current ones, washing out the older ones. I hope they don't keep doing that.
@vkkoorchester6667 ай бұрын
wow. you are always making the very content in regard to AOEIV that I would like to see. If your conjectures / hopes / projections would come true it would be just amazing. Also your civ-concepts are so cool.
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
Thanks man :)
@AaronOmar-co8bn6 ай бұрын
@@ChillyEmpire You saying that Byzantines "identified themselves to be more Greek" is misleading. They considered their empire Greek and Roman, unable to remove their Roman identity despite adopting Greek language and culture {this was due the roman pride and significance of roman achievements etc.}. Historical consensus and solid evidence confirm that Byzantines saw themselves as the last Romans, directly continuing the Roman Empire until its final remnants.
@artamir66057 ай бұрын
The next update either needs to be panamerican civs or maybe a theme of civs like aztecs and spanish. The spanish, the norse and something like the magyars, bulgars, poles are sorely missing from europe's roster. Venice could also have very interesting mechanics. But we can't have an all europe update, because other regions of the world are still very underrepresented.
@snowi95857 ай бұрын
I think they should focus on one region at a time. Have europe have an update, then middle east/north africa, then central/south/eastern asia, then maybe the americas, and just keep cycling between then
@benjaminlafo1237 ай бұрын
Just wanna say, one of your videos got me into AOE4 and I've been loving it! Keep it up Chilly!
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
Ayy that's awesome :D
@kaiwalker74507 ай бұрын
I’m new to age of empires, but I found your account and I love how you incorporate an actual passion for history into your videos about the game. Great videos man, keep it up
@Xheasor7 ай бұрын
Thank you! I was so looking for something like this. Tried to search reddits for what civs could be added to AoEIV, since I myself don't really know which empires were there at that timeframe. But I love thinking and speculating about it. Love ur civ design videos aswell. Hope to see more of them soon, watched them all already! I really do hope the devs watch ur vids aswell and bring all the civs u made a design video for already. Loved the Khmer, Vikings and the koreans so far! So thanks! You're the only one doing this. Keep it coming! :)
@Arcodus7 ай бұрын
This was a great watch. I would love to play as Aztecs and Lionheart. And it was very interesting to hear about the Mississipians!
@mrclbntn7 ай бұрын
Good Video, a civ Concept for every faction should be enough content for this year. For your info, Bohemia was a kingdom, for its own and is now present in aoe2 with war wagons and hufnica.
@69columbus7 ай бұрын
Nice vid. Great proposed factions let's hope the devs include them in the future.
@alkrimiy7 ай бұрын
Alexander Nevsky famously fought with Teutons and Swedes, but didn't fight with Mongols. Instead he had recognized himself as the vassal of Khan and paid him a tribute. Actually in Russian historiography he considered sometimes as a symbol of the Eurasian and anti-Western path. Personally I would prefer Southern Rus variant (focused on Ukrainian land), may be something like Kingdom of Galicia-Volhynia (Kingdom of Ruthenia). Starting from the 13-th century its warfare was kind a mix between Old Rus, European knightly and Nomadic step traditions. Although it's very interconnected with Poland and Lithuania as well.
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
Oof did I mess that up. My bad. I didn't know he was seen as the anti-western path that's really interesting!
@alkrimiy7 ай бұрын
@@ChillyEmpire he is quite controversial figure in the Russian history. Obviously he was always venerated as an ancestor of Russian ruling house and for his military victories. He considered to be a 'saint' in the Russian Orthodox church. The Golden legend of the Old Rus. According to other view he was a 'traitor', who refused an alliance with the Pope and European kings against the Mongols, and bowed the knee to the khan. And the danger of the Teutons and Swedes, as well as the scale of the battles with them, are exaggerated.
@CloudCuckooCountry7 ай бұрын
Listened to this whole video in the background and it was really interesting so thanks! My money's on Spanish as one of the next civs added, cos I've seen it requested a lot in the broad AoE community (AoE2 players as well) and the devs saw a lot of success adding two highly requested fan favourite civs in the last expansion. For the second civ, I'm not sure what the devs would choose, but there are a lot of great options. I'd absolutely love to see an AoE4 take on the Aztec military. Your civ concept for the Vietnamese made me really interested in them. Adding a second African civ or a Hindu civ would be incredibly cool. I also have a friend who really really wants to see either the Scots or the Irish (would they be called "the Gaels" in this game?). We're spoiled for choice! It's a shame we only get two of these a year!
@ThomasSilva19977 ай бұрын
I feel there is a distinct lack of central asian civilizations here. The steppes were incredibly important, and there is extensive history between many states of many different steppe cultures that allows the Mongol invasions to happen. The spread of religions like Buddhism, Islam, Tengrism, Christianity and Manichaeism, and the flow of knowledge, trade and technology between these steppes civilizations is big part of the Mongol's advantage in their conquests. I could see these in the game; the Kara-Khanid Khanate, Kyrgyz Khaganate, Qocho Kingdom and the Kipchak Confederations with either the Cumans or the Kimeks. Check them out, I feel you'd find them interesting.
@samuilpetkov4977 ай бұрын
@ChillyEmpire I hope you check out the history of Bulgaria!
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
I forgot to mention the Danes in this video but I'm almost certain a Viking style faction will be next on the roster for most requested fan-favorite civs. Aztecs/Spanish probably are after them. Spanish and Portuguese civs seem to have great appeal with the Latin American audience is my guess.
@Diahborne7 ай бұрын
Love this video! Also do you have any plans to do variant civs for China, Vietnam, Korea, or Japan?
@alkrimiy7 ай бұрын
Delhi Sultanate as an Indian Empire is not even closely so controversial as Rus equal to Moscow principality
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
haha interesting...
@АнтонГородецкийНочнойДозор7 ай бұрын
Ukrainians, as usual, come with their alternative history. You are fantasy lovers. In the game Russian tsarstvo = Rus the full historical title of the tsar of Russia (The Grand Duke of Moscow) sounds like this: "Great sovereign, by the grace of God, tsar and Grand Duke of all Rus, Vladimir, Moscow, Novgorod, Pskov, Ryazan, Tver, Yugorsky, Perm, Vyatka, Bulgarian, Tsar of Kazan, Tsar of Astrakhan, Tsar of Siberia and all the northern country lord" All this is united Rus- the game developers absolutely reliably named the faction
@alkrimiy7 ай бұрын
@@АнтонГородецкийНочнойДозор thank you for the rapid confirmation of my commentary above
@AaronOmar-co8bn6 ай бұрын
Moscow principality come from the Kievan Rus originally, so what's the big deal?
@alkrimiy6 ай бұрын
@@AaronOmar-co8bn the deal is who is the real successor of the Kievan Rus. In my personal understanding Kievan Rus was similar to HRE in Western Europe. The cradle of few different policies and nations. But you might find a load of different opinions on that matter.
@AlienPerspective7 ай бұрын
I paused before the New Civilizations Section. I did some research and here's my list. Let's see how close we are. Within each region, I ranked them based on how deserving I think the civilization is of being represented, based off of population, longevity, cultural scope, and sphere of influence. Asia --Tamils - the most deserving of all listed; greatest population after Song China in year 1,000; massive cultural development; huge scope of influence; long lasting --Bengalis (Pala Empire, Bengal Sultanate) --Khmer - very interesting design on your channel --Goryeo/Joseon --Vietnamese - most exciting design in any of your videos; love the teleporting hideout network --Majapahit Europe --Spanish --Danes - probably not enough population or longevity; but that Saga system design was cool Africa --Amazigh --Ethiopians --Beninese --Kingdom of Matupa Americas --Maya --Mississippians - the faction I'm rooting for the most getting into the game --Andeans - Wari and Tiwanaku Empires early, Inca Empire late --Toltec - probably not long lasting enough; problems would occur with balancing them and retaining some accuracy --Puebloans - probably not a great enough population, but they're on the bubble and deserve consideration --Aztecs - definitely didn't last long enough to deserve a spot; but wow the design on your website is the most exciting one Variants --Timurid Empire (Mongols) --Liao or Jin Dynasty (China) - during the AoE4 timeline, China had 20-25% of the world's population; they deserve a lot of representation --Ghana or Songhai Empire (Mali) --Solomonic Dynasty or Sultanate of Mogadishu (Ethiopia) --Some sort of reference to the Crusades
@AlienPerspective7 ай бұрын
Watched the full video. I knew you had a lot of good picks from your website. I think you nailed it.
@ETheeb7 ай бұрын
This look very very pleasing
@Gteesma2 ай бұрын
Came here for AoE4 talk, stayed for History Lesson
@twinsen194910 күн бұрын
Honestly! So much history and geography thanks to videogame talk. If nothing else, the Devs should add some of these civilisations for the sheer potential to learn of worldwide cultures!
@agf05_zbn067 ай бұрын
Yeah Majapahit, bhayangkara with gun lance and djong war ship that have some immune from cannon fire.
@squidberry35337 ай бұрын
Enjoyed the video. Imo devs should definitely add Ethiopia, Korea and at least one southeast asian empire before wrapping up aoe4.
@Markov0927 ай бұрын
About Novgorod. My concept in nutshell to make it more distinctive: - Trading - market buffs; - Administration - unique non-military unit called Posadnik, that buffs villagers and traders similarily to HRE prelates or Byzantine cisterns; - Defense - can build stone walls and towers without need of Spasskaya landmark, unique military unit called Tysiatskii, that can build better defenses and buff built ones. Unlike regular Rus, Novgorod doesn't have warrior monks and has less religion buffs. By the way, Golden Horde also was more Turkic faction. They were Kipachak Cuman, Tatar, Ubzek Turkic speaking empire. that became own thing from Mongols.
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
Ho...nice concept. And I didn't know that about the Golden Horde! Makes a lot of sense though.
@AaronOmar-co8bn6 ай бұрын
Markov, why are you making claims that are not even true? the golden horde was not completely Mongolian I would agree, but they still had a big Mongol presence alongside Kipchak Turkic's, as well as other Turkic's who had served the Mongol empire previously before the conquest of Europe and other parts of the world. the Mongols were not the only people who filled the manpower to cause their mass conquest. so, while the Mongols were not the only big significant ethnic group which ruled the golden horde, they were still big enough to be recognized as a division of the Mongol empire, since there were still Mongols serving the golden horde and just like other Mongol divisions. The Turks in World History" by Carter Vaughn Findley "Empire of the Mongols" by Michael Prawdin The Mongol Empire: A Historical Encyclopedia" by Timothy May
@Vocu7 ай бұрын
Any OG Asherons Call players here when he mentioned Katars ;)
@qwerty2229997 ай бұрын
I would like to contest you on the usefulness of Mangudai. They are a hell to deal with in 3v3 and 4v4 team games, as a single Mongol player can devastate your trade, with the only counter pretty much being walls. It is a very effective surprise attack that will both cripple the enemy economy as well as steal the attention of all 4 enemy players. Granted it is a niche use, Mangudair are not to be underestimated. They just don't fill every combat scenario, which is fine.
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
They're not terrible in large teams. They're pretty troll in 1v1s.
@wcko876 ай бұрын
Some notes on what you said on AoE2: The Bohemians in AoE2 have the hussite war wagon (high hp gunpowder "tank" unit) and the houfnice (stronger bombard) as their unique units The Poles and Lithuanians have winged hussars as regional units, and the Magyars have the magyar huszar as its unique unit Khmer architecture is colorful and shiny in AoE2, not overgrown
@twinsen194910 күн бұрын
With the introduction of variant civs, I'm imagining that they could introduce two civs being "variants of each other". I'm not savvy enough with history, but what I can come off with would be something like: instead of making a "Celt civilization", they could introduce both the Irish and the Scots. They're "variant civs" of each other, effectively introducing two new civs for the price of making one.
@adrienleroy19147 ай бұрын
Great choice ! Would love to see some venitian concept as well in the game regarding their place in the middle age
@Kameeho7 ай бұрын
Man, that was a lot of video, sadly, I can only rate it half as good as your othern videos, because i felt that half my heritage got forgotten. (The Vikings). kek. Jokes a side. Great idea with the whole google map thingy! Really puts into perspective how vast the world is and fun to see where all civilizations are located at. And brings a small tear to eye seeing that some of my flags getting put into good use :> About the Hungarian black armor: Yes they were indeed black, or very dark blue, was due the result of the Acid-bath the steel armor was given add more corrosive resistance to the steel parts. The process is called Blueing. There was different kind of acids, but the one that made them black, or a dark shade of blue was the cheapest one, and the "shiny" acid bath that made the shiny grey steel armor we mostly accosiate armor with. Actually the Cheapest armor, ironically consider the OTD, was the black one used by the Hungarians. And a reasoning for this is that they were often under a tight budget, they were afterall more Mercentile army, that was being personally invested by a Lord or a King's own pocket. Also love the fact that every nation Flags are filled with symbols and simple colors lines. Meanwhile Benin: ""You know what would be a great idea to discourage foreign invasions? Lets make a flag about chopping peoples head off! LOL"
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
Wait...did I forget to mention the Danes/Vikings? Whoops...well...you already know I want the civ added. Oh yeah, thanks for making flags yo. You and Seicing and the rest of the forum community. I'll give a shoutout in the description. I didn't know that about the black army! Thanks for the interesting tidbit :)
@epsilonator7 ай бұрын
In addition to the Tamils, I'd also like to see Rajputs or Odias (the Eastern Ganga Empire and the Gajapati empires) as Indian factions. Rajputs are great for a campaign against the Delhi Sultanate, and would probably be a primarily cavalry civ, with a unique cavalry improvement (fake elephant trunks) to gain bonuses against elephants. The Odias on the eastern coast of India also have a rich history and they were one of the only Indian empires untouched by the Delhi Sultanate. It would be an elephant civ with worker (villager) elephants that don't require dropsites.
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
I always read them as Orissa! I didn't know they had a "d" in their name. Yeah they'd be super cool as well. I love how distinct the architecture is from that region.
@epsilonator7 ай бұрын
@@ChillyEmpire Yeah the place name is Orissa (a state of India) and the residents are called Oriyas or Odias, whatever you want to call them.
@passavonsungsorn2897 ай бұрын
I would like to see the Venetian Republic civ because this civ had wars with Byzantine and Ottoman.
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
Venice could be cool...but what units would they have?
@twinsen194910 күн бұрын
God please I hope they are watching this.
@abrahamlincoln46917 ай бұрын
Inca need food and farm buffs and need to be an integral part to that civ. The Incans really emphasized food and food storage, with massive storages of food that would last years. There a reason why Peru has some of the best food in the world. There was basically no starvation. They also didn't use a writing system exactly but the Quipu, where they would record EVERYTHING. All sorts of records, and admirative work was done via that.
@MrGatonegroishАй бұрын
I like these ideas, but having Scotland/Ireland as a VARIANT of England would be a gauntlet-dressed slap to the face
@AetherXIV7 ай бұрын
bro knows his history! respect
@MG_Hans7 ай бұрын
High quality content from Chilly again !!
@Otgoo11047 ай бұрын
Timurids empire is turkco mongol empire timur himself was turkified mongol (barlas mongol), if dzungar khagante become mongols new variant it will be amazing
@diegoancheitaflores40567 ай бұрын
The Aztecs historically use cavalry in their war to Spain, because they stole a lot of horses. and there is the possibility that, as well as using those horses stolen from Spain, then they could use stolen cannons. Idk, great video btw:)
@fernis87987 ай бұрын
Never heard of aztecs fighting on stolen horses, could you share a source? Also Spain never declared the war to the Aztecs, it was more about fighting tribes.
@diegoancheitaflores40567 ай бұрын
@@fernis8798 my source is age of empires 2 haha, just kidding, i investigated and I was wrong, those who rode horses were the Mapuches against the Spanish, you can search about Lautaro, but specifically the Aztecs did have horses that were given by the spanish as a exchange for gold (or that were left after the flight in the sad night), but never they could use them. ps: in age of empires 2, the aztecs in their campaign did use horses, and in games they can use them after converting stables with the monks lol
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
Aztecs with horses just look funky to me. The way they look in AOE2 is...weird...
@raynightshade83176 ай бұрын
You sure your not thinking of the Inca
@АнтонГородецкийНочнойДозор7 ай бұрын
Novgorod Republic is very different from the rest of Russia, Novgorod is the largest, most influential and richest city in Rus (It was the varangians who came from Novgorod for Byzantium), Rus began from Novgorod, not from Kiev, democracy ruled in it, decisions were made by the people on the square, and the republic itself lived off trade. A great option for Rus, where there will be no hunting, but there will be trade - Novgorod is a member of the Hanseatic League, traded throughout northern Europe to England and Germany
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
Hanseatic League with trade as a Novgorod mechanic sounds amazing!
@alexs84047 ай бұрын
Great compilation! Although it’s nice to dream, I think to bring it a little bit back to reality, I don’t see Koreans, Portuguese, Benin, Hungarians, or Amazigh having any chance of making it in. All of them are either overshadowed by other civs in the time period or don’t have enough to distinguish themselves from current civs already in the game, unless they rework current variants into new civs entirely. I also can see New World civs being completely left out because as we saw with AoE3DE, “proper representation” is so much thornier with Native American civs that devs might just want to avoid that headache entirely lest people try to cancel them for giving those civs Bombards (they were even throwing a fit in the comments to your Reddit posts for not coming up with a completely new siege system)
@kronos42927 ай бұрын
I definitely think a Kingdom of Jerusalem civilization would be perfect for aoe4. While theres some overlap of course they definitely developed their own culture and tied in with the Crusader ideals I think they could really make them stand out.
@jotahbarreira7 ай бұрын
Maybe the Bohemian Kingdom could be a future HRE variant civ
@twinsen194910 күн бұрын
For American civs you could skip trebuchets and mangonels (we could find a way to replace those), and straight up give them some gunpowder in imperial, as there are accounts of natives stealing from the conquistadors. Similar with cavalry, give them a single, semmi-heavy multi-purpose sofa-style horse in imperial. In Argentina (and I believe in USA too), natives are closely associated with horse-riding. Here in fact horse rider natives were known to be bola-throwers while on horseback in fact
@twinsen194910 күн бұрын
You could do slingers as a makeshift mangonel, where they couldn't inaccurate but with high damage so a group might be used as an improvised mangonel. You could also implement the atlatl as a better javaline thrower to function in some way, and... That's more or less all I can think of for now
@hussainali86266 ай бұрын
Timurids can be their own civilization, begins as timurids and ends with Khanate of Bukhara maybe, Persians can get their civilization by resembling the Safavids mostly, and Fatimids could be a cool addition as well
@chickovik7 ай бұрын
very good Video, you should work as an devoloper of age of Empires. So many good Ideas.
@4les7 ай бұрын
I think that's saturation, I'm more on the side of things were "less is more" videogame desing. Currently some civs are quite outdated and boring (HRE, English) so I would rather have even less civs than now if that would mean a more dense and unique civ rooster.
@zackrodriguez66532 ай бұрын
Hell yeah, brother.
@raynightshade83176 ай бұрын
Portuguese Fetorias are pretty much fortified trading posts
@Ahmadabdal_7 ай бұрын
admiral Yi Sun Shin being one of the most underappreciated naval commander in history will be something i'll never get over
Hope for Poles. Winged hussars we know should appear in the imperial age. In the 1410 Poles beat Teutons
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
When were Winged Hussars first used? I wonder if they fall too far out of the time period
@michal47367 ай бұрын
@@ChillyEmpire The year 1500 is considered to be the beginning of the hussars in Poland and for the next 200 years Winged Hussars were active. So it is probably late Imperial Age in the AoE4
@michal47367 ай бұрын
@@ChillyEmpire and in AOE2, hussars were present but very generally and as light cavalry, while Polish hussars were ultimately super heavy cavalry armed with a lance, saber, rapier, and 2 pistols
@joew96907 ай бұрын
I hope they add next expansion and Poland and our Winged Hussars ;) Good sintesis of factions. Salahudin was Kurdish descent. We have plenty Horse formations - Dragons , Panzers, Lisovians and Winged Hussars we were mainly cavalry civ - we have very rich history - we stand against HRE few times under Conrad II in Budziszyn and under Glogów with German Henry the V Salisian (Germans hang children and women from near vilages around siege towers Polish defenders were force to shoot to their relatives but they stop and defet HRE invasion ) and Kevian Rus our King Boleslav the Brave rise against Kievian Rus and conquer Kiev city and defeat Kievian Vojewod /Kniaź (Prince) Jaroslav the Wise - and took his sister who offended him by mocking him describe him as savage boar and refuse his marriage proposal. We beat Teutonic Order in 1410 - Our Vasals Pomeranians suported by Polish king Boleslav Wrymouth lunch greatest invasion to Scandinavia and defeat Vikings burning Upsala and Konungehela in 1135 end nordic regin on Seas. We faced III Mongols invasions under Legnica we lost our king Henry II the Religious and he lost his head. At II invasion they pour into undefended lands sack burn rape and pilage half a country galop under the Cracow but stop at very gates at III invasion , prince Leszek the black drive them back with Hungarian king Bella from our lands. From 1500 start our Golden age we beat Crimean Tatars ...Sweds , Russians and Cosacks and also Turks (via Sige of Vienna 1683 or Battle at Parkany wehere Hussars uterly crush Turks) we launch contra attack on Swedo Russian Coaltion and defet dem at Kłuszyn and Smoleńsk and we take Moscow in 1612 for 2 years ! Russians must gather 27 000 of people and 15.000 mercanerys from west to stop our millitary support banish our defenders traped in Moscow. in 1600 to 1611 broke The Polish Swedish war called Deluge ..we almost lost but under Lightmountain monastyr we turn the tide and push back Sweds and cut almost they all forces. There is plenty battles acros the period for Polish camp. Take care Chilly .
@ParulMalik777 ай бұрын
maratha civs for forts ,gurilla warfare,plunder
@vitorguimaraes54907 ай бұрын
You forgot about the danes/vikings
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
Derp. They're such an obvious shoe-in it completely slipped my mind!
@artamir66057 ай бұрын
My wishes for the next years (i hope they can move to two updates a year eventually): [Variants in braces] Europe: Norse [Danes] Spanish [Aragon] Magyars Bulgars (great for Byz. campaign) Poles Venice/Genoa/Papal state Portuguese Georgians/Armenians America: Aztecs Inkas Mayans Pueblo Asia: Koreans [Golden Horde or Timurids for Mongols] [Seljuks for Ottomans] Khwarezmians Khmer Vietnamese Tamil? Tatars? I sadly don't know enough about african history to predict their civs. There are a few must-haves, without the game wouldn't feel complete. I'm excited to see what the future holds, but Relic kinda needs to speed up a bit.
@luismedina-yo2yv6 ай бұрын
id love to see the spanish and the aztecs added :)
@snowi95857 ай бұрын
Hungary's something I'd really like to see.
@kingpietro127912 күн бұрын
you forgot one big civilization the VIKINGS. thats a civ i miss
@raynightshade83176 ай бұрын
Inca could access Cav with an Imp Landmark
@fireleaks43420 күн бұрын
romanians have great history too but sadly they were 3 principalities divided as 3 separate nations and i think they couldnt fit them into just a single civ bu it would be so cool
@fireleaks43420 күн бұрын
at least u could revolt into them in aoe 3 :)))))))))
@mahotion14255 ай бұрын
Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth would be nice
@18MrChencho7 ай бұрын
Spanish Almogavars
@HandyMan1257 ай бұрын
i wanna see some siberian tribes and the dutch
@gehtdichnixan24997 ай бұрын
Great Video. I am missing a viking faction that turned into sweden. Cause the vikings kicked English asses a Lot of Times and sweden was a big enemy of the hre in the 30 years war. They would have so much Potential für unique units especially ships
@miketastic976 ай бұрын
Kingdom of Cicilia or Armenia would be really cool.
@dootie36982 ай бұрын
I want to see a southamerica civ before anything else we got so much on the easrtern half of the world we need something from the west side. Aztecs with a human sacrifice landmark where either you kidnap other people villagers or use yours to get buffs or special units
@brandon86677 ай бұрын
Theyre starting to think the Incans did have a writing system with something called a syllab Quipu. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a5yJdM2rl7rcn3U.htmlsi=k-nmnO40sS2A3F64 The first part and last part of the documentary discusses it.
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
To my knowledge the Quipu is not a full on writing system so much as a cataloguing system but I'll check out the video thanks for the link!
@brandon86677 ай бұрын
@ChillyEmpire it's more of a recent hypothesis. There is a Spanish account of some Quipus representing syllables instead of numbers. In that documentary i linked, they sorta go over an odd Incan quipu with the main thought is that it's writing and it's one of the syllable quipus
@VII_Spiritual7 ай бұрын
🔥
@AetherXIV7 ай бұрын
I just want the Danes/Vikings :)
@18MrChencho7 ай бұрын
the new world can have the same siege as the spanish.
@kirohaas31937 ай бұрын
A little surprised you didn't include a Scandinavian civ to be added. Not that I mind, they're so overdone.
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
I derped. LOL. Of course I want a norse-style faction. One of my highest effort videos covers how I'd design the danes. I'm just dum
@Paradox-the-real-oneАй бұрын
Nothing from Italy?
@artoriuscasca4247 ай бұрын
I would really like to see either Denmark or just the "Danes" as a civ
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
I derped and forgot to include them in my list here. I 100% want to see a "viking" style civ added as well!
@neiljohnparin44747 ай бұрын
You forgot the danes/norsemen/vikings
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
derp I cant believe I forgot them
@neiljohnparin44747 ай бұрын
@@ChillyEmpire yeah! I saw your video. Great concept man.
@Andreskiller-in2fh7 ай бұрын
Is stupid to have precolombian civs as they were at the stone age until spain arrive, how could they stand against any other civ without giving them unhistorical staff just because they want to be inclusive? in aoe3 they did the same and they are some of the divs less used by players Also there werent big precolombian empires as the HRE, France, China or others in the rest of the world, as for example aztecs werent an empire but a big tribe that had under his foot the other tribes, always without ruling them, thats why when spain arrived they got the support of almost every other tribe to conquer the aztecs in the USA also werent nothing similar to empires, they werent even like the aztecs. Indian tribes were really small and even if devs add them they would be like mongols but worse
@nestorfernandez83897 ай бұрын
Facts
@ChillyEmpire7 ай бұрын
1. I’m generally not a fan of how AOE3 handled the native empires. 2. You literally described an empire. Most other empires had similar issues - one central “tribe” that dominated the ones around them. 3. Read up on the Mississippian civilization. It’s not this “small” forest dwelling concept that American media would have you believe. Regardless, there’s so much interesting flavor here to explore. AOE4 already takes plenty of historical liberties.
@grechka61965 ай бұрын
In game rus is one big historical mistake...
@sforzz7 ай бұрын
DEVS PLZ
@sebastyanpapp6 ай бұрын
Interesting vid man; original idea u got here 😎 Microsoft should see this vid and take some notes 🗒